target & capture for prismkirkmcd/mumu/... · koji yoshimura on behalf of prism target group...
TRANSCRIPT
Target & Capture for PRISM
Koji YoshimuraOn behalf of PRISM Target Group
Institute of Particle and Nuclear ScienceHigh Energy Accelerator Research Organization
(KEK)
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
ContentsTargetry for PRISMSolenoid captureConducting TargetSummary
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
What’s PRISM
PRISM( Phase Rotation Intense SlowMuon source)
A dedicated secondary muon beam channel with high intensity(1011~1012µ/s)and
narrow energy spread(a few%) for stopped muon experiments
PROTON BEAM DUMP
CAPTURE
SOLENOID
PRODUCTION TARGET
PRIMARY PROTON
MATCHING
SECTION SOLENOID
FFAG RING
RF CAVITY
5 M
INJECTION SYSTEM
EJECTION SYSTEM
Pion Capture
FFAGPhaseRotator
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Requirements of Targetry for PRISM
Pion Momentum~100 MeV/cbackwards capture scheme available!
EmittanceAs low as FFAG acceptance
horizontal 10000π, vertical 3000π
MethodSolenoid CaptureConducting Target
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Simulation Study of Solenoid CaptureSimulation code
MARS, GEANT312 T field -> 3T
47MeV/c ~ 85 MeV/cBackward2000 π ~ 3000 π vertical acceptance
proton
~10 cm
B(high) typ. : 16T
B(low) typ. : 4T
field matching region
B
target(tungsten : 2~3 Interaction Length)
~0.1 radian
Shielding Material
Shielding Material
B
R > R B /Blow lowhigh high
22
proton
12 T
3 T
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Simulation ResultsTarget material
W is better than C
B fieldDetermined by Capture fieldYield∝Bfield
Target radiusThin target is better
DATA Summmary
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 246
Target Length
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
02 04 06 0
diameter of Warm bore
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
05 10 15 20
B fiel d
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
024 6
Target Radius
C
W
C
W
B Field Radius(cm)
Length Bore (φ)
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
SC Solenoid in High Rad. EnvThick radiation shield is necessary
~500 WRadiation shield of 25 cm in thickness is needed
Large bore for absorberHigh stored energyExpensive magnet
To optimize designWe totally rely on simulation.Simulation code should be experimentally evaluated!
AbsorberSC Coil
Thickness of Absorber
25 cm, 500W
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Direct Measurement of Radiation heat by Beam
Prototype magnet of 10.9 TeslaHybrid coil (NbTi, Nb3Sn, HiTc)Indirect cooling with GM cryocooler10.9 T in 6 cm warm bore
Beam test with Coil-MockupDirect measurement of heat load by radiationStudy behavior of magnet under heating conditionKEK 12 GeV proton
1011 protons/sCryo-calorimeter
Prototype magnet
Temperature rise by radiation heat
Beam test at KEK Nov, 2002
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Comparison
2 Ton~20 TonCoil mass
~3 M$~17 M$Cost (Estimate)*
~16 MJ~190 MJStored energy
NibTiNb3Sn/NbTiS/C
~1.6~1.6Coil length
0.551.1Coil OR
0.450.65Coil IR
0.40.55Cryost. IR
0.100.05Useful aperture R
6 T12 TB
*PDG: COST(in M$)=0.523[E/1 MJ)]0.662
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
REALISM
Baseline optionB=6TIR=450 cm, L=160 cmGraphite Target L=2λ=80 cmShield thickness 25cm
Still Necessary for R&DCooling ~500 WQuench protectionRadiation safetyThin Graphite target
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Further R&D Planof PRISM Solenoid option
R&D Coil will be constructed this yearHalf or Quarter sizeHeating using AC LOSSOr Special heaterCooling Method ~500W
Pool boilingThermo siphon (Using convection)
Proto-type of graphite targetJHF neutrino group (Hayato, Oyabu et.al)Water cooled graphite (40 kW heat)Thinner Target?
Engineering Design -> Future Upgade
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Conducting TargetConfine pions inside the target with troidal field
B. Autin, @Nufact01Advantage over Solenoid
Low emittance beamLinear transport element
No SC solenoid channelCheaper!
Cooling condition better?
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Comparison of target material
Mercury is good candidateMinimum PowerEasy to coolingHigher pion yield
Technical IssuesHow to cut off electrical circuit?Stress due to pinch effect Container
ShockwaveCavitationThicker wall can be used!
No reabsorptionWindow
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Setup for current test
1st phase1000 A DC100 J
2nd phase250 KA 2.5ms Pulse (K2K horn PS)15 KW
3rd phase1 MW?Beam test?
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Mercury Test LoopMercury 18 litter ~ 250 kgStudy mercury flow
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Summary
Solenoidal CaptureStandard schemeBeam test was successfully performed using the mockupDesign parameters will be considered.Realistic R&D Model coil
Conducting TargetmeritsR&D Work has just started!
Proof of principleFeasibility test of High current liquid target
NuFACT’03June 7th, 2003, Columbia University
Basic Priciple
B ∝ r(Inside the target)
ProtonAcceptance