target vs intensity: understanding the new acc/aha lipid guidelines pamela l. stamm, pharmd, cde,...
TRANSCRIPT
TARGET VS INTENSITY:UNDERSTANDING THE NEW ACC/AHA LIPID GUIDELINES
Pamela L. Stamm, PharmD, CDE, BCPS, BCACP
Associate Professor, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy
October 26, 2014
DISCLOSURES
I have NOTHING to disclose
Where do you provide care?
Community / specialty pharmacy
Long term care pharmacy
Hospital
Academia
I am retired!!!!!!!
D
B
A
C
E
Who performs?
Lipid screenings
Lifestyle counseling / programs
Adjusts in medications
Monitoring / Lab ordering
B
A
C
D
Objectives
• Compare and contrast the 2013 ACC / AHA Guidelines for the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to previous guidelines
• Compare and contrast the new Pooled Estimates Cardiovascular Risk Calculator to other risk calculators
• Initiate, reassess, and monitor LDL lowering therapy in adults and elderly patients
• Communicate the updated ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines to patients and prescribers
Previous Guideline Approach
• LDL targets based on estimated absolute risk• Treat to Target Approach• Lower [LDL] is better
3 Main Publications
http://my.americanheart.org/professional/ScienceNews/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-for-Prevention_UCM_457211_Article.jsp
Lifestyle Guideline
s
Blood Cholester
ol
Risk Assessme
nt
Lifestyle Guidelines
• Applies to adults < 80 yoa
• Most trials reviewed• Included patients with CVD risk factors• Excluded trials with significant weight loss• Excluded people on antihypertensive and lipid lowering therapies
2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Circulation. 2013 doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1.
Lifestyle Guidelines
Addressed 3 key questions:
1. What is the impact of physical activity on BP and lipids?
2. What is the impact of dietary patterns / micronutrient composition on CVD risk factors?
3. What is the impact of sodium and potassium on CVD risk factors and outcomes?
Circulation. 2013 doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1.
Which Diet?
Mediterranean Diet
South Beach DietZone Diet
Adkins Diet
Step 1 and 2 Diets
Isocaloric Diets
Portfolio Diet
Meal Replacement Diets
Opitmal Macronutrient Intake Strategies Diet
Advice on Dietary Patterns
Take Home Points on Diet
• It’s the overall pattern that matters most• Reduce calories from saturated fat
• Aim for 5-6 % of calories of saturated fat • Lowers LDL ~ 11%
• Reduce calories from trans fat• Reduce sodium by 1,000 mg per day • It is unclear if reducing dietary cholesterol reduces LDL-C
Circulation. 2013 doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1.
How Much Exercise & What Kind?
• 120-160 min of moderate-intensity / wk, or
• 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity a week ,
or • equivalent combination of the above
• Aerobic activity • Last at least 10 minutes• Spread throughout the week
3 Main Publications
http://my.americanheart.org/professional/ScienceNews/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-for-Prevention_UCM_457211_Article.jsp
Lifestyle Guideline
s
Risk Assessme
ntBlood
Cholesterol
ATP• Emphasis: LDL reduction /
goals
• Comprehensive approach to care
• Primarily expert opinion
• Stressed CHD prevention
ACC/AHA 2013
• Emphasis: fixed dose statin
• Limited to 4 specific questions
• Limited expert opinion
• Stresses ASCVD prevention
Emphasis on Statin Therapy and
Key Findings from RCTs and Meta-analyses
Definitions
Primary Prevention: • No previous ASCVD event • Includes those with subclinical
atherosclerosis
Secondary Prevention: • Previous ASCVD
Definitions
Clinical ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease• CHD (coronary heart disease)• Stroke• PAD (peripheral artery disease)
Hard ASCVD• Nonfatal MI• Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Death• Stroke (Fatal or nonfatal)
0.4 0.8 1.2
Nonfatal MICHD deathAny major coronary event CABGPTCAUnspecifiedAny coronary revascularisationIschaemic strokeHaemorrhagic strokeUnknown strokeAny strokeAny major vascular event
0.74 (0.69 - 0.78)0.80 (0.73 - 0.86)0.76 (0.73 - 0.79)0.76 (0.69 - 0.83)0.78 (0.69 - 0.89)0.76 (0.70 - 0.83)0.76 (0.73 - 0.80)0.80 (0.73 - 0.88)1.10 (0.86 - 1.42)0.88 (0.76 - 1.02)0.85 (0.80 - 0.90)
0.79 (0.77 - 0.81)
Reduction in risk is proportional for each 39mg/dL decrease in LDL-C
Lancet 2010; 376: 1670–81
20
Relative risk (CI) per39mg/dL LDL-C
reduction
Statin better Control better99% or 95% CI
Reduction in MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS is proportional for each 39 mg/dL decrease in LDL-C Lancet 2010; 376: 1670–81
0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
Relative risk (CI) per39 mg/dL LDL-C decr.
Statin/more betterControl/less better
More vs. less intense statin
A to Z PROVE-IT
TNT IDEAL SEARCH
257 (7.2)406 (11.3)
889 (4.0)938 (5.2)
1347 (3.6)
282 (8.1)458 (13.1)
1164 (5.4)1106 (6.3)1406 (3.8)
Total 3837 (4.5) 4416 (5.3) 0.72 (0.66 - 0.78)
No. of events (% pa)
Statin/moreControl/less
99% or 95% CI
0.75 1.25Statin better Control better
Reduction in MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS is proportional per 39mg/dL LDL-C reduction, by baseline LDL-C Lancet 2010; 376: 1670–81
< 78
> 78, < 97.5
> 97.5, < 117
> 117, < 136.5
> 136.5
0.87 (0.60 - 1.28)
0.77 (0.62 - 0.97)
0.76 (0.67 - 0.86)
0.77 (0.71 - 0.84)
0.80 (0.77 - 0.84)
Baseline LDL (mg/dL) in Statin vs control
Relative risk (CI) permmol/L LDL-C reduction
Old Basic Approach
Assess hard CHD Risk
Select Statin
Titrate Statin to LDL Goal
Assess hard ASCVD Risk
Select Moderate / High Intensity Statin
Confirm LDL Response
New Basic Approach
Recognizing need for Medications
Four defined “Statin Benefit Groups”
1. Persons with clinical ASCVD
2. Baseline LDL-C > 190mg/dL
3. Persons with DM & LDL-C 70-189mg/dL
4. 10 year hard ASCVD risk > 7.5%
Diabetes (40-75
yrs)
Clinical ASCVD
LDL-C > 190
mg/dL
Estimate ASCVD Risk
< 75 yrs
High Intensity
< 75 yrs
Risk > 7.5%Risk < 7.5 % or > 75 yrs
ModerateIntensity
> 75 yrs
> 75 yrs
Age > 21 years
Estimate ASCVD Risk40-79 years
5 - 7.5%Moderate
Intensity Statin or consider
other risk factors
> 7.5%Moderate or
High Intensity Statin
When Risk is Uncertain (<7.5%)
Measure Supports Initiating Therapy
Family history of premature CHD
Male <55 yoa
Female <65 yoa*
hs-CRP > 2.0 mg/L
CAC score > 300 Agatston units or >/=75 percentile for age, sex, and ethnicityⱡ
ABI <0.9
*1st degree relative; ⱡ see http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org/CACReference.aspx for additional information,
Defining Statin IntensityHigh-Intensity
(mg)Moderate-Intensity
(mg)Low-Intensity
(mg)↓ LDL–C about
≥50%↓ LDL–C about
30% to <50%↓ LDL–C
< 30%
Atorva (40†)–80 Rosuva 20 (40)
Atorva 10 (20) Rosuva (5) 10 Simva 20–40‡Prava 40 (80) Lova 40 Fluva XL 80 Fluva 40 bidPitava 2–4
Simva 10Prava 10–20Lova 20Fluva 20–40Pitava 1
True -or- False?
If a patient with ASCVD experiences a >50% decrease in LDL-C on
treatment with a Moderate Intensity Statin, the dose does NOT need to be increased to that of a High Intensity
Statin.False
A 65 yo patient calls to refill his Simvastatin 80mg. He has a
history of ASCVD. What do you do?
Refill it, it is a high intensity statin
Refill it if he has been on it > 12
months
Reduce dose to 40mg/day for
safety
Change it to 80mg of Atorvastatin
D
B
A
C
Paired Exercise:
Educate Provider on this Intervention
Recommend switching simvastatin 80mg to high
intensity statin
When is A Moderate Intensity Preferred for
Safety?
• Multiple comorbidities (renal / hepatic dysfunction)• Unexplained ALT > 3 ULN• Previous statin intolerance• Drug interactions• Age > 75 yrs• Asian ancestry (rosuvastatin)• H/o hemorrhagic stroke
Special Populations
• Those under 40 yrs
• Elderly (75 yrs or older)
• HF
• Hemodialysis
• Diabetes with HF or Hemodialysis
So what about LDL and NonHDL Targets?
• “No recommendation for or against”
• For those who want an objective target – look at LDL response
• Moderate intensity ↓ 30-50%• High intensity ↓ 30-50%• But it is not a substitute for intensity!!!
• Other guidelines still contain goals (ADA, AACE, IAS, NLA)
So when should we combine therapy?
• When Triglycerides > 500mg/dL
• Inadequate LDL response for• ASCVD < 75 yrs• Baseline LDL > 190 mg/dL• DM, 40-75 yrs
JD has ASCVD risk > 7.5%. He takes niacin SA 2g daily, rosuvastatin 40mg, &
fenofibrate 160mg. His LDL 54, TG 96.
Does he meet criteria for combination therapy?
JD has ASCVD risk > 7.5%. He takes niacin SA 2g daily, rosuvastatin 40mg, &
fenofibrate 160mg. His LDL 54, TG 96 What changes do you make?
Stop the niacin
Stop the niacin and the fenofibrate
Reduce rosuvastatin to 10mg/day
Change to pravastatin for safety
Nothing
D
B
A
C
E
The Lancet 2011; 377:2181-2192 (DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60739-3)
SHARP Trial
TK has statin intolerance. ASCVD risk > 7.5%. Her baseline LDL 130, TG 150, HDL
35. What do you start?
Cholestyramine or other BAS
Niacin
Ezetimibe
Gemfibrozil
Fenofibrate
D
B
A
C
E
Evidence summary p 134-135 Full
Report on Blood
Cholesterol
Safety Monitoring
Baseline• ALT • CK (only if at perceived risk of adverse muscle
events)
Follow-up• ALT if symptoms suggest hepatotoxicity• CK with muscle weakness, pain, cramping, stiffness,
generalized fatigue
Efficacy Monitoring
• Lipids 4-6 weeks after initiation and dose change to assess LDL-C response
• 6-12 months thereafter
• More frequently if needed for adherence
Points to Note
• No recommendation FOR or AGAINST specific LDL or NonHDL targets
• Decrease dose if intolerance occurs - even low intensity statins reduce ASCVD events
• May decrease dose if LDL-C < 40mg/dL on 2 occasions
• Insufficient evidence to treat baseline LDL-c < 70 mg/dL
3 Main Publications
http://my.americanheart.org/professional/ScienceNews/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-for-Prevention_UCM_457211_Article.jsp
Lifestyle Guideline
s
Blood Cholester
ol
Risk Assessme
nt
Why not Framingham or other existing tools?
• Historically dated populations
• Limited ethnic diversity
• Narrowly defined endpoints, lacked stroke
• Endpoints influenced by cohort providers (elective procedures)
• Endpoints with poor diagnostic reliability (HF & angina)
Pooled Risk Calculator
• Developed from 5 major cohorts• Validated on 2 external cohorts
• Designed for primary prevention patients NOT on drug therapy
• Provides 2 different risk assessments• 10 year risk of hard ASCVD• Lifetime risk for someone age 50 yrs
Pooled Risk Calculator
• Downloadable excel spreadsheet: my.americanheart.org/cvriskcalculator
• Online calculator: see above
• ASCVD Estimator App (Android & iPhone)
Who qualifies for risk assessment
• C or AA (possibly others)
• Males and Females
• Aged 40-79
• No known ASCVD
• NOT on lipid altering therapy
For which of the following patients can ASCVD risk be performed?
35 yo C Male
55 yo M with diabetes
65 yo Asian female
78 yo CM with h/o strokeD
B
A
C
Independent Risk Factors
Framingham OmnibusAge √ √
Tobacco Use √ √
Diabetes √
HTN treatment
√ √
TC √ √
HDL √ √
SBP √ √
Other potential Risk Factors
• Those that did not have sufficient evidence to support use at this time
• CKD• Albuminuria• Cardiorespiratory fitness• ApoB
• Those to NOT use• CIMT
Explain to a given patient their ASCVD Risk
• 55 yr old Non-Hispanic Caucasian Female• Denies tobacco and DM• Diagnosed with HTN
• 154/92 on Lisinopril 40mg daily• TC 240, LDL 170, HDL 60
1. Determine her ASCVD risk?2. Explain her risk to her (neighbor)?
For every 100 persons like you, 4 – 5 will experience a NF MI, Heart related death, or stroke.
95-96 will not.
True -or- False?
I can estimate someone’s longer term risk by multiplying the 10
year risk by X.False
Lifetime Risk Calculator
• Estimate for a person 50 yoa
• Not a continuous function
• Fit into 1 of 5 risk categories for gender
Lloyd-Jones et al. Circulation 2006;113(6)791-8.
Cumulative incidence of CVD adjusted for the competing risk of death for men & women according
to aggregate risk factor burden at 50 yrs.
Lloyd-Jones D et al. Circulation 2006;113:791-798 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notable patterns for risk > 7.5%
Age ofNon Smoker
Age of Smoker
AA Male 66 53
C Male 63 57
AA Female 70 63
C Female 71 66
Controversies / Myths
“New risk assessment tool overestimates risk”
“More people will take statins!”
78 yo M requests a refill of atorvastatin 80mg daily.
PMH: h/o CVA, HTN, and OACurrent Meds: Atorvastatin, ASA, Lisinopril,
Acetaminophen
Denies any symptoms of muscle pain, weakness, cramping
78 yo M requests a refill of atorvastatin 80mg daily.
Refill it
Suggest he stop therapy
Reduce dose to 40mg/day
Reduce dose to 20mg/dayD
B
A
C
Summary
• New guidelines are designed to • Better identify those needing treatment• Simplify treatment options• Minimize Clinical Inertia
• Many questions remain unanswered• They conflict with other recent guidelines