targeted vlf wave-injection experiments mark gołkowski muri review stanford university february 18,...

16
Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

Post on 20-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments

Mark Gołkowski

MURI Review

Stanford University

February 18, 2009

Page 2: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

2

Russian Alpha Transmitters

3.6 second pattern (six 0.6s segments) 400ms pulses, 200ms off between pulses Three sites alternate among 3 frequencies

14.88 kHz

11.91 kHz12.65 kHz

L=2.61 L=1.97L=1.78

Resonant Energies: ~50-500 keV

Page 3: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

3

Adelaide, Australia

~500 kW ? Navigation transmitter in Komsomolsk na Amur in Russian far east (400 msec pulses) at L = 1.97

Conjugate point in southern Australia

Stanford University receiver since January 2007

Explore and quantify wave-growth

KangaroosStanford Scientists

Stanford ScientistsKangaroos

Page 4: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

4

Historical Background

Triggered emissions have been observed from other mid-latitude transmitters: NAA (L=2) 14.5 kHz, 200 msec pulses

Whistler-mode Komsomolsk Alpha pulses have been studied by Tanaka et al. 1987 in the context of whistler propagation characteristics

Page 5: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

5

Example 1-Hop

2

2

1A

Becc

Page 6: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

6

Temporal (non-linear) Growth

Page 7: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

7

Example Growth

~7-8 dB total

~70-80 dB/sec

Page 8: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

8

Example Growth

Page 9: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

9

Example Detection

Page 10: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

10

10-Day Statistics (1-10 April)

Count of 1-hop observations in synoptic (1min/5min) recordings

10 days during and after a geomagnetic disturbance

1-Hop observations show qualitative relationship to geomagnetic activity

Need more data to quantify relationship

Page 11: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

11

Diurnal patterns

Day DayNight Day DayNight

Page 12: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

12

Average Daily Variations

Sunrise

Sunset

Tanaka et al. 1987 Stanford 2008

Diurnal variation shows maxima after sunset and sunrise

Tanaka et al. 1987: diurnal variation is same for whistlers and is a propagation effect (duct formation, coupling in/out of duct)

Page 13: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

13

DEMETER Observations (1)

NovosibirskKomsomolskKrasnodar

DEMETER

2-Hop Echoes

2-Hop echoes with triggered emissions excited by Novosibirsk transmitter observed on DEMETER

Transmitter: L=2.61

Echoes observed from L=1.77 (start of burst mode) to L=1.64

Max Amplitudes: ~1 V/m

2-Hop Propagation Time: ~1.25 seconds

Page 14: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

14

DEMETER Observations (2)

DEMETER

Triggered emissions observed in conjugate region of Krasnodar Transmitter

Noticeable Doppler shift

Observation: L=2.3,

Transmitter (Krasnodar): L=1.78

Page 15: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

15

Propagation Modes

Emissions ducted end to end can be observed on the ground ‘Hybrid’ Mode [Bell et al., JGR, 1983]: ducted waves observed after

exiting duct and reflecting from ionosphere Triggered emissions from non-ducted waves? Use ray tracing and observed Doppler shift to determine trajectories

Page 16: Targeted VLF Wave-injection Experiments Mark Gołkowski MURI Review Stanford University February 18, 2009

16

Summary

1-Hop echoes regularly observed on the ground from Komsomolsk Alpha transmitter

Triggering of off-frequency emmisions not observed yet on the ground

DEMETER observes triggered emissions (off-frequency components) near all 3 Alpha transmitters

Future Work: Determine propagation paths for satellite observations, quantify conditions for wave growth using both ground and satellite observations