tarvitseeko lean tietomallinnusta vai tietomallinnus lean...

72
Tarvitseeko Lean tietomallinnusta vai tietomallinnus Lean’ia? Arto Kiviniemi Professor of Digital Architectural Design University of Liverpool Email: [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Tarvitseeko Lean tietomallinnusta vai tietomallinnus Lean’ia?

Arto Kiviniemi Professor of Digital Architectural DesignUniversity of LiverpoolEmail: [email protected]

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Finnish connection between Lean and BIM research

Prof Lauri Koskela – University of Huddersfield Prof Arto Kiviniemi – University of Liverpool

Colleagues at:

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

1996 – 2004:No clear connection

between Lean and BIM research areas

University of Salford, School of Built

Environment 2010 – 2013:Lean needs good

information management and BIM needs new

processes.

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

The basic problems of the construction industry?

Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018

Current construction industry has well known gaps and limitations that impact investments in research and innovation

1Levitt R. and Plambeck E. (2010). Identtifying and mitigating structural barriers to diffusion of energy-saving technologies in the building industry.http://web.stanford.edu/group/peec/cgi-bin/docs/buildings/research/Identifying%20and%20Mitigating%20Structural%20Barriers.pdf2Macomber, J. (2003). Follow the money: What really drives technology innovation in construction. Proceedings of the ASCE Construction Research Congress, Denver, CO.

1Vertical Fragmentation- Division by timing of involvement

1Horizontal Fragmentation- Divisions by Disciplines / Trades

1Broken Agency- Companies who incur risks differ

from those who receive benefits

1Culture of Competitive Bidding- Companies with innovative solutions

may not be the “lowest bidder”

2ROI for Contractors is high hurdle for Investments- Revenue and cost of work

are major drivers- Investment must impact

one or both- Benefit must accrue to

the contractor for it to be worthwhile

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Mainstream economic doctrine…

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Mainstream economics does not accept that any waste occurs!• The mainstream economic doctrine includes the assumption of

optimal productive efficiency of firms. For example, in his book on construction economics, Myers (2004) says:• “In any free market economy businesses will never waste inputs. A business

will not use 10 units of capital, 10 units of labour, and 10 units of land when it could produce the same amount of output with only 8 units of capital, 7 units of labour, and 9 units of land.”

Myers, D. (2004). Construction economics: A new approach. Spon Press, London

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

• Management and organization science was seen as falling into social sciences – production was positioned as a mere application area for management.

• Three root stems: organizational behaviour, economics, quantitative methods

• Research had to result in empirical generalizations about behaviour.

• Research was to be done by scientists external to the phenomena studied.

Koskela, L. (2017). Why is management research irrelevant?. Construction management and economics, 35(1-2), 4-23.

The 1959 books by Gordon & Howell and Pierson

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Powerful assumption: decomposed sub-processes are mutually independent! Thus, the whole production effort can be integrated in an additive manner: by minimizing the costs of each department, function, section, and work station, the total costs will be minimized.

Decomposition in management theories

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Elimination of waste” versus “optimal allocation” of “scarce resources”

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Waste in production vs. optimum production

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Switch in theory of production through leanEarlier• Transformation model of

production

Lean• Flow model of production

• Focus on waste

• Time, variability as drivers

• Value generation model of production

• Transformation model of production

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Two views on processesMechanistic• “…business processes can be

broken down into a hierarchy of smaller processes which share the same characteristics”

Armistead & Rowland: Managing Business Processes, 1996

Organic• “Every activity, every job is part

of the process. A flow diagram of any process will divide the work into stages. The stages as a whole form the process. The stages are not individual entities…”

Deming: Out of the crisis, 1982

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

What is lean? What is not lean?Mainstream thinking on management and engineering

• The central and noble task of managers and engineers is to find the best possible (optimal) plan or design

• It is the duty of others to realize the plan or design

• Leads to the need for organisational control

Lean thinking

• Besides enabling the finding of the best possible plan or design, managers and engineers should focus on reducing the gap between the intended/ideal and the achieved (this gap equals waste)

• There will always be waste (unnecessary use of resources)

• Leads to the need for learning and improvement

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Consequential switches: collaborationEarlier• Not especially emphasized, as

division of work and the waterfall process assumed to suffice

• Throwing outputs over the wall to the next designer/expert

Lean• Emphasis to create the

conditions for collaboration:• Common ground

• Standardized routines

• Boundary objects

• Sharing gains and pains

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Consequential switches: communicationEarlier• Written and oral communication

Lean• Visual communication (visual

management)• Cognitively, more efficient as using

“System 1”

• Cognitively, less prone to errors as using “System 1”

• Provides common ground

For system 1 (Unconscious Reasoning), see Dual process theory in Wikipedia

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Consequential switches: management Earlier• Command and control

• Centralised planning

• Execution based on push by the plan

• Control to detect deviations and to return back to the plan

Lean• Participatory planning

• Pull based execution

• Learning from deviations

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Structuralframe

Envelope

HVAC, electricity,

automation

Inner works Avoidablecosts,waste

Unavoidablecosts

Traditional view Lean view

What causes costs in a construction project?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Our tendency to prefer buying a solution

rather than changing our behaviour…

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

“Buying BIM software is like buying a membership in a fitness club.Having the card in your pocket does not make you fit,

it only gives you possibility to start exercising!”

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

If you want results from BIM, you must change your behaviour…

This stupid device does not burn fat!

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Lean Construction

Building Information Modeling

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

An

nu

al n

um

ber

of

arti

cles

Year

Lean Construction, BIMGoogle Scholar article count

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Where to start?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Tools or processes are not the goal – define what you want to achieve…

Penn State Project BIM Execution Planning Guide• http://bim.psu.edu/Project/resources/contactinfo.aspx

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

One size does not fit all…

Don’t copy, think what are your goals?

Collaborative design and engineering with IFC in the Netherlands – Leon van Berlo 08 April 2015

“A CENTRAL DATA STORE CAN STIMULATE WRONG BEHAVIOUR”

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Collaborate, really collaborate! (Sutter Health’s IPD Slogan)

Image: DPR Construction

Collaborative design and engineering with IFC in the Netherlands – Leon van Berlo 08 April 2015

EVERYONE BRINGS THEIR CRAFTSMANSHIP AND EXPERTISE

TO ACTUALLY COLLABORATE

Collaborative design and engineering with IFC in the Netherlands – Leon van Berlo 08 April 2015

THE REAL QUESTIONS ARE:- WHAT DO I NEED TO DO MY JOB?

- WHAT DO OTHERS NEED FROM ME TO DO THEIRS?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

BIM and communication?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Why do (or did) we need drawings?• In paper-based environment drawings were the best way to communicate the building

design – we cannot write buildings.

• However, technical drawings are very high level abstraction of our 3D world and not easy to read for non-professionals – and even for professionals it is not easy to build a complex 3D space by reading drawings.

?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Problem: large number of often incoherent documents, different views and different abilities to understand

?

??

??

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Use of 3D enables better communication and shared understanding

Image courtesy Granlund

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Separation of content and representation

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

In traditional documents content and representation cannot beseparated

If you need a new representation,you must make a new document

Difficult (if not impossible)to keep information coherent!

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

In BIM the content is in a database andrepresentation is just a view to the data

Source: Graphisoft ArchiCAD

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Interactions between Lean and BIM?

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

The interactions between Lean and BIM

Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B. and Owen, R.L., (2010)The Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in Construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136 No. 9 pp. 968-980

2 + 2 > 4 ?

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Adopting BIM and Lean in the Construction Industry

▪ Pioneering construction companies find that when adopting BIM and Lean Construction in tandem, two plus two makes more than four.

▪ There are synergies between the use of BIM technology and the application of Lean Construction techniques that result in efficiencies that might not have been achieved when adopting either one or the other independently.

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Lean Principles

BIM Functionality

Red

uce

Var

iab

ility

Red

uce

cyc

le t

imes

Red

uce

bat

ch s

izes

Incr

ease

fle

xib

ility

Sele

ct a

n a

pp

rop

riat

e p

rod

uct

ion

co

ntr

ol

app

roac

h

Stan

dar

diz

e

Co

nti

nu

ou

s im

pro

vem

en

t

Use

vis

ual

m

anag

eme

nt

Des

ign

th

e p

rod

uct

ion

sy

stem

fo

r fl

ow

an

d

valu

e

Co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

req

uir

eme

nts

cap

ture

Focu

s o

n c

on

cep

t se

lect

ion

Ensu

re r

equ

irem

en

ts

flo

wd

ow

n

Ver

ify

and

val

idat

e

Go

an

d s

ee f

or

you

rsel

f

Dec

ide

by

con

sen

sus

con

sid

er a

ll o

pti

on

s

Cu

ltiv

ate

an e

xten

ded

n

etw

ork

of

par

tner

s

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X

Visualization of form 1 1,2 3 4 11 5 6 4

Rapid generation and evaluation of multiple design alternatives

2 1 22 7 7 8

3 9 9 22 51 1 16 5

4 10 12 8 16 5

5 1,2 1 12 1 1 1 5

Maintenance of information and design model integrity

6 11 11 11

7 12 12 22 12

Automated generation of drawings and documents

8 11 22 (52) 53 54 54

Collaboration in design and construction

9 23 36 36

10 2,13 24 33 43 46 49

Rapid generation and evaluation of multiple construction plan alternatives

11 14 25 (29) 31 (41) 44

12 15 25 (29) 37 (41) 44 47

13 2 40 25 (29) 17 40 40 40 44 47 49

Online/electronic object-based communication

14 29 26 30 30 34 34 (42) 47 48

15 18 26 30 30 34 38 38 34 (42) 45 49

16 19 27 32

17 20 28 35 (42) 50

18 21 30 30 34 39 (42) 47 48

Lean - BIM Interaction Matrix

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Lean Principles

BIM Functionality

Reduce Variability

AGet quality right the first time

reduce product variabilityB

Collaboration in design and construction

9

10Multiuser viewing of merged or separate

multidisciplinemodels

2,13Clash checking

Collaborative multi-disciplinary review

2. Building modeling imposes a rigor on designers in that flaws or incompletely detailed parts are easily observed or caught in clash checking or other automated checking. This improves design quality, preventing designers from “making do” Koskela 2004a and reducing rework in the field as a result of incomplete design.Dehlin and Olofsson 2008; Eastman et al. 2008, p. 422

13. Multidisciplinary review of design and of fabrication detailing, including clash checking, enables early identification of design issues.Eastman et al. 2008, p. 362; Khanzode et al. 2008

Lean - BIM Interaction Matrix - example

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Conclusions

Lean and BIM both change the way we think about

construction:

- As a production process with flow;

- As a production process with virtual prototyping;

- As an information intensive production process, with

two types of information: product and process

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Should we model the product and the process?

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and FutureSlide from the presentation of Martin Fischer (CIFE, Stanford University) in Stockholm Open BIM Conference, 26th March 2012

http://www.openbim.se/documents/openbim/konferens_26_mars_2012/Presentationer/120326_Martin_Fischer_presentation.pdf

Example of extremely accurate site modelling – DPR Construction, Inc.

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and FutureSlide from the presentation of Martin Fischer (CIFE, Stanford University) in Stockholm Open BIM Conference, 26th March 2012

http://www.openbim.se/documents/openbim/konferens_26_mars_2012/Presentationer/120326_Martin_Fischer_presentation.pdf

Example of extremely accurate site modelling – DPR Construction, Inc.

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Do we have environment enabling collaboration?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

The question

is NOT about

technology!

Image by Gulnaz AksenovaSisyphus by Mongoose Studio

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

How do the clients procure services;

select and incentivise the team?

Is the selected team capable to do

what the client wants it to do?

Usually there are no incentives for

collaboration, so companies try to

minimise their workload and risks.

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Late involvement lack of knowledge in early stages

Tendency to “minimise” costs by hiring the team members and contractors as late as

possible and based on the lowest bid.

Significant waste and increased costs in the construction phase because crucial parts of the necessary knowledge were missing in

the decision making in early stages!

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018 Courtesy Gulnaz Aksenova, PhD student, University of Liverpool

Ivan Krylov: Swan, Pike and Crayfish (1814)

This situation affects willingness to

collaborate; how can we align the goals?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Need for new contractual models, e.g. IPD or alliance models

Source: HansonBridgett: The IPD Framework

Multiparty contract

Polyparty contract

“Sharing the painand the gain”

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

If you want the winning team, do you select the cheapest players?If you want a winning team, do you select the cheapest playersor do you select players with the right skills for every position?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Where are we now?

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Cost and schedule overruns are the norm in the construction sector• “Large projects across asset classes typically take 20 percent longer to finish than

scheduled and are up to 80 percent over budget.”• Due to the lack of digitization, information sharing is delayed and may not be universal.• Owners and contractors therefore often work from different versions of reality.• The use of paper makes it difficult to capture and analyze data; that matters because in procurement and

contracting, historical performance analytics can lead to better outcomes and risk management.• Mismanaged paper trails also routinely spur disagreements between owners and contractors on such

matters as construction progress, change orders, and claims management.• Finally, paper trails simply take more time.

Sources: McKinsey & Company “Imaginingconstruction’s digital future”, June 2016

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-futureand http://blog.honestbuildings.com/mckinsey-finds-staggering-increase-in-construction-cost-overruns

Courtesy Professor Jennifer Whyte, Imperial College London, 2018

Can we manage and understand complex product systems?

Photo credit: Micagoto, Flickr

The Berlin Brandenburg Airport’s feasibility and preplanning phase took about 15 years. Construction started in 2006, and the airport was expected to take five years to be built. The target opening date was Oct. 30, 2011. Today, over six years later, the airport has yet to open. The latest estimate of project costs is €7.9 billion, almost 50 percent above the approved budget of €5.4 billion!

Courtesy Professor Jennifer Whyte, Imperial College London, 2018

Can we manage and understand complex product systems?

Photo credit: Micagoto, Flickr

The Berlin Brandenburg Airport project encountered significant quality issues, which is surprising in a country so focused on excellence and high-quality standards. Reports indicate that 66,500 defects were found, 34,000 are described as “significant” and 5,845 as “critical.” Critical defects included a non-functional fire protection, an alarm system that was not built in accordance with appropriate building codes, wrongly placed smoke extractors, conducts without isolation, and walls built to the wrong fire rating.

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Is the situation improving?

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Newest editions (2017) of textbooks on economics in a university library

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Do textbooks on economics treat lean topics?

Waste Lean Toyota

Mankiw No No No

McEachern No No Yes*

Parkin No No No

Are key concepts in the glossary or index?

* In connection to a discussion on changing market shares of different car manufacturers

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Core of current economics

• Economics is the study of how people and society choose to employ scarce resources that could have alternative uses in order to produce various commodities and to distribute them for consumption, now or in the future, among various persons and groups in society. (Samuelson)

• But• Does not explain the formation of waste or value

• Considers productivity (implicitly) as a phenomenon

• Hostile to the concept of waste

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Williamson: Champion of waste in economics, at least kind of

• “Bureaucracy and waste are irrelevant if firms can be assumed continuously to be operating on production functions and maximizing profits. Alas, that is an egregious oversimplification.”

• “Although the need to get priorities straight is unarguably important, first-order economizing – effective adaptation and the elimination of waste – has been neglected.”

• Williamson is right up to this point; resources are scarce because we are wasting them, thus the priority should be in elimination of waste, before optimal allocation

• However, next he commits a mistake; he looks only at waste occurring in transactions (hence transaction cost economics) and fails to see waste in production

Source: Williamson: Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization, 1991

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

Newest editions (2016 -2017) of textbooks on organisational behaviour in a university library

10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future

How do textbooks on organizational behaviour treat lean topics?• Buchanan & Huczynski: Discussed in several instances, positive

examples but also sweeping unjustified negative statements and shallow/erroneous understanding

• Knights & Willmott: Discussed in several instances, even with some enthusiasm, but shows shallow understanding

• Martin & Fellenz: Briefly mentions lean in a few sentences (nothing related to lean in the index)

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

However, the research publications of

Lean and BIM are increasing…

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Developing TheoryGoogle Scholar search for “Lean Construction” and “BIM”

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

An

nu

al n

um

be

r o

f ar

ticl

es

Year

Lean and BIM

Building Information Modeling

Lean Construction

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

KanBIMAim:

To propose, define, develop and test a BIM-enabled system to support production planning and day to day production control on construction sites.

Kanban(pull flow control in lean production management)

+

BIM(Building Information Modeling)

=

KanBIM

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Lean Production Planning

© 2018 Rafael Sacks

Typical results

Net value-earned without KanBIM

Net value-earned with KanBIM

Gross production without KanBIM

Gross production with KanBIM

Actual Time (minutes)

School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018

Some positive results of collaboration and team work

from real projects too…

Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018

IPD is suggested as a mechanism for addressing industry challenges

Three underlying changes:

1. Multi-party agreement that defines relational interactions of the signatories, in pursuit of shared goals, and in use of collaborative governance.

2. Early involvement of all parties by engaging the designers, contractors, specialty trades, and vendors early in the design process when their influence has the greatest impact.

3. Shared Risk and Reward aligning their successes and the project success so that the team and the project succeed, or fail, together.

Kent, D. C., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). Understanding construction

industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery.

ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8),

815-825.

Core teamTier 1: Incentivized

subcontracts

Tier 2: Traditional

subcontracts

Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018

Impact of Delivery Strategy

204 projects-------------------Public127(62%)

Private 77(38%)-------------------Completed 2008 - 2013

Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018

Improving our projects and their outcomes requires ways to improve project teams’ ability to deliver results:

Innovation in IPDIntegrated Delivery (Procurement)

If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself.

– Henry Ford