tarvitseeko lean tietomallinnusta vai tietomallinnus lean...
TRANSCRIPT
Tarvitseeko Lean tietomallinnusta vai tietomallinnus Lean’ia?
Arto Kiviniemi Professor of Digital Architectural DesignUniversity of LiverpoolEmail: [email protected]
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Finnish connection between Lean and BIM research
Prof Lauri Koskela – University of Huddersfield Prof Arto Kiviniemi – University of Liverpool
Colleagues at:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
1996 – 2004:No clear connection
between Lean and BIM research areas
University of Salford, School of Built
Environment 2010 – 2013:Lean needs good
information management and BIM needs new
processes.
Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018
Current construction industry has well known gaps and limitations that impact investments in research and innovation
1Levitt R. and Plambeck E. (2010). Identtifying and mitigating structural barriers to diffusion of energy-saving technologies in the building industry.http://web.stanford.edu/group/peec/cgi-bin/docs/buildings/research/Identifying%20and%20Mitigating%20Structural%20Barriers.pdf2Macomber, J. (2003). Follow the money: What really drives technology innovation in construction. Proceedings of the ASCE Construction Research Congress, Denver, CO.
1Vertical Fragmentation- Division by timing of involvement
1Horizontal Fragmentation- Divisions by Disciplines / Trades
1Broken Agency- Companies who incur risks differ
from those who receive benefits
1Culture of Competitive Bidding- Companies with innovative solutions
may not be the “lowest bidder”
2ROI for Contractors is high hurdle for Investments- Revenue and cost of work
are major drivers- Investment must impact
one or both- Benefit must accrue to
the contractor for it to be worthwhile
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Mainstream economics does not accept that any waste occurs!• The mainstream economic doctrine includes the assumption of
optimal productive efficiency of firms. For example, in his book on construction economics, Myers (2004) says:• “In any free market economy businesses will never waste inputs. A business
will not use 10 units of capital, 10 units of labour, and 10 units of land when it could produce the same amount of output with only 8 units of capital, 7 units of labour, and 9 units of land.”
Myers, D. (2004). Construction economics: A new approach. Spon Press, London
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
• Management and organization science was seen as falling into social sciences – production was positioned as a mere application area for management.
• Three root stems: organizational behaviour, economics, quantitative methods
• Research had to result in empirical generalizations about behaviour.
• Research was to be done by scientists external to the phenomena studied.
Koskela, L. (2017). Why is management research irrelevant?. Construction management and economics, 35(1-2), 4-23.
The 1959 books by Gordon & Howell and Pierson
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Powerful assumption: decomposed sub-processes are mutually independent! Thus, the whole production effort can be integrated in an additive manner: by minimizing the costs of each department, function, section, and work station, the total costs will be minimized.
Decomposition in management theories
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Elimination of waste” versus “optimal allocation” of “scarce resources”
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Waste in production vs. optimum production
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Switch in theory of production through leanEarlier• Transformation model of
production
Lean• Flow model of production
• Focus on waste
• Time, variability as drivers
• Value generation model of production
• Transformation model of production
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Two views on processesMechanistic• “…business processes can be
broken down into a hierarchy of smaller processes which share the same characteristics”
Armistead & Rowland: Managing Business Processes, 1996
Organic• “Every activity, every job is part
of the process. A flow diagram of any process will divide the work into stages. The stages as a whole form the process. The stages are not individual entities…”
Deming: Out of the crisis, 1982
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
What is lean? What is not lean?Mainstream thinking on management and engineering
• The central and noble task of managers and engineers is to find the best possible (optimal) plan or design
• It is the duty of others to realize the plan or design
• Leads to the need for organisational control
Lean thinking
• Besides enabling the finding of the best possible plan or design, managers and engineers should focus on reducing the gap between the intended/ideal and the achieved (this gap equals waste)
• There will always be waste (unnecessary use of resources)
• Leads to the need for learning and improvement
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Consequential switches: collaborationEarlier• Not especially emphasized, as
division of work and the waterfall process assumed to suffice
• Throwing outputs over the wall to the next designer/expert
Lean• Emphasis to create the
conditions for collaboration:• Common ground
• Standardized routines
• Boundary objects
• Sharing gains and pains
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Consequential switches: communicationEarlier• Written and oral communication
Lean• Visual communication (visual
management)• Cognitively, more efficient as using
“System 1”
• Cognitively, less prone to errors as using “System 1”
• Provides common ground
For system 1 (Unconscious Reasoning), see Dual process theory in Wikipedia
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Consequential switches: management Earlier• Command and control
• Centralised planning
• Execution based on push by the plan
• Control to detect deviations and to return back to the plan
Lean• Participatory planning
• Pull based execution
• Learning from deviations
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Structuralframe
Envelope
HVAC, electricity,
automation
Inner works Avoidablecosts,waste
Unavoidablecosts
Traditional view Lean view
What causes costs in a construction project?
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Our tendency to prefer buying a solution
rather than changing our behaviour…
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
“Buying BIM software is like buying a membership in a fitness club.Having the card in your pocket does not make you fit,
it only gives you possibility to start exercising!”
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
If you want results from BIM, you must change your behaviour…
This stupid device does not burn fat!
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Lean Construction
Building Information Modeling
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
An
nu
al n
um
ber
of
arti
cles
Year
Lean Construction, BIMGoogle Scholar article count
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Tools or processes are not the goal – define what you want to achieve…
Penn State Project BIM Execution Planning Guide• http://bim.psu.edu/Project/resources/contactinfo.aspx
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
One size does not fit all…
Don’t copy, think what are your goals?
Collaborative design and engineering with IFC in the Netherlands – Leon van Berlo 08 April 2015
“A CENTRAL DATA STORE CAN STIMULATE WRONG BEHAVIOUR”
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Collaborate, really collaborate! (Sutter Health’s IPD Slogan)
Image: DPR Construction
Collaborative design and engineering with IFC in the Netherlands – Leon van Berlo 08 April 2015
EVERYONE BRINGS THEIR CRAFTSMANSHIP AND EXPERTISE
TO ACTUALLY COLLABORATE
Collaborative design and engineering with IFC in the Netherlands – Leon van Berlo 08 April 2015
THE REAL QUESTIONS ARE:- WHAT DO I NEED TO DO MY JOB?
- WHAT DO OTHERS NEED FROM ME TO DO THEIRS?
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Why do (or did) we need drawings?• In paper-based environment drawings were the best way to communicate the building
design – we cannot write buildings.
• However, technical drawings are very high level abstraction of our 3D world and not easy to read for non-professionals – and even for professionals it is not easy to build a complex 3D space by reading drawings.
?
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Problem: large number of often incoherent documents, different views and different abilities to understand
?
??
??
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Use of 3D enables better communication and shared understanding
Image courtesy Granlund
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
In traditional documents content and representation cannot beseparated
If you need a new representation,you must make a new document
Difficult (if not impossible)to keep information coherent!
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
In BIM the content is in a database andrepresentation is just a view to the data
Source: Graphisoft ArchiCAD
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
The interactions between Lean and BIM
Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B. and Owen, R.L., (2010)The Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in Construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136 No. 9 pp. 968-980
2 + 2 > 4 ?
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Adopting BIM and Lean in the Construction Industry
▪ Pioneering construction companies find that when adopting BIM and Lean Construction in tandem, two plus two makes more than four.
▪ There are synergies between the use of BIM technology and the application of Lean Construction techniques that result in efficiencies that might not have been achieved when adopting either one or the other independently.
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Lean Principles
BIM Functionality
Red
uce
Var
iab
ility
Red
uce
cyc
le t
imes
Red
uce
bat
ch s
izes
Incr
ease
fle
xib
ility
Sele
ct a
n a
pp
rop
riat
e p
rod
uct
ion
co
ntr
ol
app
roac
h
Stan
dar
diz
e
Co
nti
nu
ou
s im
pro
vem
en
t
Use
vis
ual
m
anag
eme
nt
Des
ign
th
e p
rod
uct
ion
sy
stem
fo
r fl
ow
an
d
valu
e
Co
mp
reh
ensi
ve
req
uir
eme
nts
cap
ture
Focu
s o
n c
on
cep
t se
lect
ion
Ensu
re r
equ
irem
en
ts
flo
wd
ow
n
Ver
ify
and
val
idat
e
Go
an
d s
ee f
or
you
rsel
f
Dec
ide
by
con
sen
sus
con
sid
er a
ll o
pti
on
s
Cu
ltiv
ate
an e
xten
ded
n
etw
ork
of
par
tner
s
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X
Visualization of form 1 1,2 3 4 11 5 6 4
Rapid generation and evaluation of multiple design alternatives
2 1 22 7 7 8
3 9 9 22 51 1 16 5
4 10 12 8 16 5
5 1,2 1 12 1 1 1 5
Maintenance of information and design model integrity
6 11 11 11
7 12 12 22 12
Automated generation of drawings and documents
8 11 22 (52) 53 54 54
Collaboration in design and construction
9 23 36 36
10 2,13 24 33 43 46 49
Rapid generation and evaluation of multiple construction plan alternatives
11 14 25 (29) 31 (41) 44
12 15 25 (29) 37 (41) 44 47
13 2 40 25 (29) 17 40 40 40 44 47 49
Online/electronic object-based communication
14 29 26 30 30 34 34 (42) 47 48
15 18 26 30 30 34 38 38 34 (42) 45 49
16 19 27 32
17 20 28 35 (42) 50
18 21 30 30 34 39 (42) 47 48
Lean - BIM Interaction Matrix
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Lean Principles
BIM Functionality
Reduce Variability
AGet quality right the first time
reduce product variabilityB
Collaboration in design and construction
9
10Multiuser viewing of merged or separate
multidisciplinemodels
2,13Clash checking
Collaborative multi-disciplinary review
2. Building modeling imposes a rigor on designers in that flaws or incompletely detailed parts are easily observed or caught in clash checking or other automated checking. This improves design quality, preventing designers from “making do” Koskela 2004a and reducing rework in the field as a result of incomplete design.Dehlin and Olofsson 2008; Eastman et al. 2008, p. 422
13. Multidisciplinary review of design and of fabrication detailing, including clash checking, enables early identification of design issues.Eastman et al. 2008, p. 362; Khanzode et al. 2008
Lean - BIM Interaction Matrix - example
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Conclusions
Lean and BIM both change the way we think about
construction:
- As a production process with flow;
- As a production process with virtual prototyping;
- As an information intensive production process, with
two types of information: product and process
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and FutureSlide from the presentation of Martin Fischer (CIFE, Stanford University) in Stockholm Open BIM Conference, 26th March 2012
http://www.openbim.se/documents/openbim/konferens_26_mars_2012/Presentationer/120326_Martin_Fischer_presentation.pdf
Example of extremely accurate site modelling – DPR Construction, Inc.
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and FutureSlide from the presentation of Martin Fischer (CIFE, Stanford University) in Stockholm Open BIM Conference, 26th March 2012
http://www.openbim.se/documents/openbim/konferens_26_mars_2012/Presentationer/120326_Martin_Fischer_presentation.pdf
Example of extremely accurate site modelling – DPR Construction, Inc.
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
The question
is NOT about
technology!
Image by Gulnaz AksenovaSisyphus by Mongoose Studio
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
How do the clients procure services;
select and incentivise the team?
Is the selected team capable to do
what the client wants it to do?
Usually there are no incentives for
collaboration, so companies try to
minimise their workload and risks.
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Late involvement lack of knowledge in early stages
Tendency to “minimise” costs by hiring the team members and contractors as late as
possible and based on the lowest bid.
Significant waste and increased costs in the construction phase because crucial parts of the necessary knowledge were missing in
the decision making in early stages!
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018 Courtesy Gulnaz Aksenova, PhD student, University of Liverpool
Ivan Krylov: Swan, Pike and Crayfish (1814)
This situation affects willingness to
collaborate; how can we align the goals?
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Need for new contractual models, e.g. IPD or alliance models
Source: HansonBridgett: The IPD Framework
Multiparty contract
Polyparty contract
“Sharing the painand the gain”
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
If you want the winning team, do you select the cheapest players?If you want a winning team, do you select the cheapest playersor do you select players with the right skills for every position?
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Cost and schedule overruns are the norm in the construction sector• “Large projects across asset classes typically take 20 percent longer to finish than
scheduled and are up to 80 percent over budget.”• Due to the lack of digitization, information sharing is delayed and may not be universal.• Owners and contractors therefore often work from different versions of reality.• The use of paper makes it difficult to capture and analyze data; that matters because in procurement and
contracting, historical performance analytics can lead to better outcomes and risk management.• Mismanaged paper trails also routinely spur disagreements between owners and contractors on such
matters as construction progress, change orders, and claims management.• Finally, paper trails simply take more time.
Sources: McKinsey & Company “Imaginingconstruction’s digital future”, June 2016
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-futureand http://blog.honestbuildings.com/mckinsey-finds-staggering-increase-in-construction-cost-overruns
Courtesy Professor Jennifer Whyte, Imperial College London, 2018
Can we manage and understand complex product systems?
Photo credit: Micagoto, Flickr
The Berlin Brandenburg Airport’s feasibility and preplanning phase took about 15 years. Construction started in 2006, and the airport was expected to take five years to be built. The target opening date was Oct. 30, 2011. Today, over six years later, the airport has yet to open. The latest estimate of project costs is €7.9 billion, almost 50 percent above the approved budget of €5.4 billion!
Courtesy Professor Jennifer Whyte, Imperial College London, 2018
Can we manage and understand complex product systems?
Photo credit: Micagoto, Flickr
The Berlin Brandenburg Airport project encountered significant quality issues, which is surprising in a country so focused on excellence and high-quality standards. Reports indicate that 66,500 defects were found, 34,000 are described as “significant” and 5,845 as “critical.” Critical defects included a non-functional fire protection, an alarm system that was not built in accordance with appropriate building codes, wrongly placed smoke extractors, conducts without isolation, and walls built to the wrong fire rating.
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Newest editions (2017) of textbooks on economics in a university library
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Do textbooks on economics treat lean topics?
Waste Lean Toyota
Mankiw No No No
McEachern No No Yes*
Parkin No No No
Are key concepts in the glossary or index?
* In connection to a discussion on changing market shares of different car manufacturers
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Core of current economics
• Economics is the study of how people and society choose to employ scarce resources that could have alternative uses in order to produce various commodities and to distribute them for consumption, now or in the future, among various persons and groups in society. (Samuelson)
• But• Does not explain the formation of waste or value
• Considers productivity (implicitly) as a phenomenon
• Hostile to the concept of waste
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Williamson: Champion of waste in economics, at least kind of
• “Bureaucracy and waste are irrelevant if firms can be assumed continuously to be operating on production functions and maximizing profits. Alas, that is an egregious oversimplification.”
• “Although the need to get priorities straight is unarguably important, first-order economizing – effective adaptation and the elimination of waste – has been neglected.”
• Williamson is right up to this point; resources are scarce because we are wasting them, thus the priority should be in elimination of waste, before optimal allocation
• However, next he commits a mistake; he looks only at waste occurring in transactions (hence transaction cost economics) and fails to see waste in production
Source: Williamson: Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization, 1991
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
Newest editions (2016 -2017) of textbooks on organisational behaviour in a university library
10/01/2018 Prof Lauri Koskela, University of Huddersfield: Lean Construction Theory: Past, Present and Future
How do textbooks on organizational behaviour treat lean topics?• Buchanan & Huczynski: Discussed in several instances, positive
examples but also sweeping unjustified negative statements and shallow/erroneous understanding
• Knights & Willmott: Discussed in several instances, even with some enthusiasm, but shows shallow understanding
• Martin & Fellenz: Briefly mentions lean in a few sentences (nothing related to lean in the index)
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
However, the research publications of
Lean and BIM are increasing…
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Developing TheoryGoogle Scholar search for “Lean Construction” and “BIM”
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
An
nu
al n
um
be
r o
f ar
ticl
es
Year
Lean and BIM
Building Information Modeling
Lean Construction
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
KanBIMAim:
To propose, define, develop and test a BIM-enabled system to support production planning and day to day production control on construction sites.
Kanban(pull flow control in lean production management)
+
BIM(Building Information Modeling)
=
KanBIM
© 2018 Rafael Sacks
Typical results
Net value-earned without KanBIM
Net value-earned with KanBIM
Gross production without KanBIM
Gross production with KanBIM
Actual Time (minutes)
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2018
Some positive results of collaboration and team work
from real projects too…
Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018
IPD is suggested as a mechanism for addressing industry challenges
Three underlying changes:
1. Multi-party agreement that defines relational interactions of the signatories, in pursuit of shared goals, and in use of collaborative governance.
2. Early involvement of all parties by engaging the designers, contractors, specialty trades, and vendors early in the design process when their influence has the greatest impact.
3. Shared Risk and Reward aligning their successes and the project success so that the team and the project succeed, or fail, together.
Kent, D. C., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). Understanding construction
industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery.
ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8),
815-825.
Core teamTier 1: Incentivized
subcontracts
Tier 2: Traditional
subcontracts
Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018
Impact of Delivery Strategy
204 projects-------------------Public127(62%)
Private 77(38%)-------------------Completed 2008 - 2013
Courtesy Prof Robert M. Leicht, Penn State University, 2018
Improving our projects and their outcomes requires ways to improve project teams’ ability to deliver results:
Innovation in IPDIntegrated Delivery (Procurement)
If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself.
– Henry Ford