tasini letter to wright

Upload: edward-isaac-dovere

Post on 30-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Tasini Letter to Wright

    1/2

    February 8, 2010

    Keith Wright

    Chair

    New York County Democratic Committee461 Park Avenue South

    New York, New York 10016

    Dear Keith:

    I am writing to inform you that I am weighing whether to attend the executive committee

    meeting of the County Committee scheduled for February 11th 2010. While I would verymuch like to explain to the county leaders the agenda and vision of my campaign, I

    believe that the process you are engaging in is a mockery of democracy. I am asking that

    you postpone any endorsement vote for the U.S. Senate seat until a later dateafter atransparent and honest process takes place.

    Recently, at your invitation, my opponent, the appointed senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, wasgiven a forum at the executive committee meeting to discuss her agenda with county

    leaders. As you know, I requested a similar forum, in the interest of open and fair debate.

    Instead, last week, I was informed that the Executive Committee had scheduled an

    endorsement vote on the race, with each candidateincluding candidates who have not

    even declared their intention to actually run in the racebeing given FIVE minutes to

    speak and answer questions, according to an email from one of your aides.

    Over the past few days, I have had a number of conversations with Democratic district

    leaders, as well as other leaders, including party state committee members. They weresurprised to hear about the proposal for the consideration of the endorsement in the

    Senate race; some did not even know such a vote had been schedule. The majority of the

    people I spoke to were, in fact, dismayed, that such a vote was being held so early in theprocess.

  • 8/14/2019 Tasini Letter to Wright

    2/2

    It is clear that the February 11th vote is being held for one purpose only: to

    undemocratically ram through an endorsement for my opponent. Ironically, however,

    your very attempt to strengthen my opponentwho has never come before the voters ofManhattan in any electionwith an endorsement shows her weakness and the lack of

    commitment our party has to serious debate.

    Our country is in a serious economic crisisyet there is not a serious debate underway in

    the country, in my opinion, about how to address that crisis. United States Senators have

    an important role in addressing the crisiswe have the greatest divide in our nationbetween rich and poor in 100 years, one in five Americans does not have decent paying

    work, one in four children are on food stamps, and millions of people working for the

    minimum wage fall below the poverty line.

    You apparently value the position of U.S. Senator so highly that you are allocating five

    minutes for each candidate to explain his or her vision and agenda. Five minutes.

    Furthermore, you have refused to supply our campaign with full contact information,

    making a fair exchange of ideas impossible.

    And, sadly, you are acting with a tone deafness to what the voters are saying. People arefed up with the dysfunction of the political system. They are fed up with both political

    parties and a sense that political leaders act only in their own self-interest and in the

    interest of preserving political machines. The process you are proposing for consideration

    of the U.S. Senate seat endorsement only reinforces that sentimentand I will make thatclear to the voters and the press.

    In asking that the vote be postponed, I would propose a different process. Each declaredlegitimate candidate in this race should be invitedif they have not already had a chance

    to do soto present their case before the Executive Committee in the same fashion that

    was extended to Kirsten Gillibrand. After such a series of presentations, at a later date, adebate should be heldopen to the public, all county committee members and the media

    between the declared candidates; the debate should be moderated by independent

    questioners. After that debate, at a future date, an endorsement vote should be held.

    Let me conclude with this observation. In our different capacities, we have both worked

    on the effort to pass a Domestic Workers Bill of Rightswhich is urgently needed. I

    know that you have put great effort into pushing the bill, which, ultimately, is aboutjustice and democracy. Because of that commitment to domestic workers, I thought your

    recent ascension to the role of county leader would herald a different chapter in party

    politics and a departure from the past. I hope you will prove that that is true.

    Sincerely,

    Jonathan Tasini

    Cc: Country leaders, Media representatives