task force membership and charge climate of innovation
TRANSCRIPT
Task Force Membership and Charge Climate of Innovation: Overview and Context The Superior Innovation Initiative Pursuing Partnerships◦ Outreach and Alternative Delivery◦ Admissions◦ Other collaborative opportunities
Open-space Activity
Charge: To develop a process with clear outcomes to engage the faculty and instructional academic staff in strategies to innovate and streamline the curriculum in academic programs and general education.
Goal: To create and implement a process that reduces the academic affairs structural deficit, thereby better aligning our curriculum to meet our budget, as well as identify ways to attract new populations of students.
BrentNotbohm
Karen Heikel
Rick Moran
MariaCuzzo
Faith Hensrud
NickSloboda
MonicaRoth Day
JaysonIwen
Budget Challenges: A perfect storm◦ Reduction in state funding, declining enrollments and
tuition freeze Our Solution◦ Task force created out of discussions between
administration and governance◦ Address the structural deficit of unfunded adjuncts and
overload ◦ Enrollment growth is the key to fiscal stability
From Program Prioritization to Streamlining to Innovation
Research process Innovation: State and National Context Our approach to innovation◦ Understanding regional needs◦ Recognize our unique strengths◦ Bottom-up approach
Cultivate a culture of innovation◦ Risk tolerance◦ Cross-pollination◦ Time
Purpose: ◦ To encourage innovations (big and small) that will allow
us to increase student enrollment (recruitment and retention) and enhance revenue for the institution.
Goals: 1. Increase student enrollment by 400 students in Fall 2018; 2. Increase non-tuition revenue; 3. Cultivate a climate of innovation.
Resources: $200,000 (UW System innovation funding)
Enrollment Based Initiatives: (priority is given to these proposals)◦ Focused on increasing enrollment through recruitment
or retention. ◦ Examples:
Diversifying Revenue Sources (Non-enrollment based initiatives):◦ Focused on increasing non-tuition revenue streams. ◦ Examples:
Must recruit 40 to 100 new students over two years Can receive start-up funding up to $50,000 Revenue Generation:◦ 100 students generate approximately $700,000 in tuition revenue.
Academic programs must be approved and available for student enrollment by Fall 2016 or Spring 2017.*
Examples:
Projects must recruit or retain 5 to 20+ students each year
Can receive start-up funding between $5,000 and $10,000 May be implemented as soon as Spring 2016 Funding preference will be given to projects with earlier
implementation dates Examples:
Non-enrollment based initiatives that create revenue streams
Can propose Big “I” or Small “i” projects Examples:◦ Licensing intellectual property◦ Renting out portions of campus◦ Summer camps◦ Consulting team◦ STEM summer program◦ Grants and gifts◦ Others?
Do you have an initiative that is already in progress? Do you have a new idea that may not require funding? If it impacts enrollment or revenue, we want to hear
about it Capture all ideas to meet our goal of 400 students Use the application form to describe your initiative
(leave budget section blank) Document and recognize innovative work that may
inspire other creative endeavors
Sustainability: This is one time funding. ◦ The expectation is that the initiative would bring in the revenue
to be sustained over time
Examples: hiring of consultants, travel or S&E to research best practices, course reassign time, overload or stipend, marketing, student workers, new equipment, supplies, etc.
Exclusions: Funding may not be used for permanent positions or any recurring expenses
Priority for funding will be given to programs attract or retain students that can be implemented by Fall 2016 or Spring 2017
Market Research:◦ Must identify market research in your proposal◦ UW Superior Administration will cover all expenses
needed to conduct market research for all funded proposals
Encourage innovations of all size and type
September 15: Selection Committee announced October 1: All proposals are due – use application form
October 15: Top proposals selected for the Big Pitch(a public presentation of the proposal – more details to come)
First or Second week in November-TBD: Big Pitch presentations (open to campus)
November 25: Committee recommendations to Chancellor
December 8: Chancellor announces decisions; Work begins on funded proposals
Complete the application form by October 1st◦ Pages 4-6 of handout
Superior Innovation Selection Committee: Provost, at-large Faculty member, Instructional Academic Staff member, University Staff member, and representatives from Faculty Senate, Enrollment Management, and Campus Life.
Committee will review all submissions based on the criteria in the handout◦ Select proposal to advance to the Big Pitch◦ Make recommendations to the Chancellor
Outreach and Alternative Delivery Admissions Pursuing Partnerships with other units
Alternative Delivery = How a course is delivered◦ Face to face◦ Hybrid - part online part face to face – many scheduling
options can involve evenings and weekends◦ Interactive TV (dial in from one or multiple sites)◦ Manipulate the length (8 week online courses attractive
to adult learners)◦ Weekend courses◦ Evening courses◦ Cohort models (lock step or open entry)◦ Satellite classrooms
Other ways to grant credit◦ Prior learning assessment◦ Increase in number of transfer credits accepted ◦ Certificate programs (“parts” of degrees or totally new
options”) Strategic use of summer – consider WHAT vs. WHO
Know your population – most are UWS jrs and srs Offer courses in bottleneck areas (during academic year) Stagger offerings to avoid overlap Increase online offerings Avoid (time) gaps between spring and summer
Increase Outreach and Campus Visibility◦ Satellite/cohort offerings at employer’s site◦ Campus/Community partnerships◦ Attach a credit option for conference participation and
assignment completion (via Instructor of Record)◦ Creation of a Center for Community Engaged
Learning
The reality of a modern student, their stories◦ Nationally, over 50% change majors◦ Instantaneous response expectation◦ 5-8 college applications are the norm◦ Multiple “SOAR” registrations are becoming common◦ AP, CLEP, PSEO, YO classes are the norm
What can we do to accommodate these new expectations and create a better experience for our prospective students?
Understand the expectations of the student
Admissions Previews and SOAR events◦ Academic and Student Service participation
Guest speaking at local middle schools, high schools, and Community Colleges◦ I have several opportunities available this fall
Admissions Staff Meetings, open invitation
Retention and Recruitment have a stronger correlation than you may think◦ 2012 Cohort Example◦ Our most influential recruiters are our students◦ If retention stays the same, we have a monumental
recruitment task to meet +400 goal◦ The evidence is in the data
We must never “stop” recruiting, especially with so much competition in our backyard
Examples: Research centers and institutes Campus Life/Residence Life Continuing Education High Impact Practices Advancement: funding Athletics Office of International Programs Others?
What is open space? What are the principles? What is our outline of design? (Handout)
If anything were possible, what innovative topics would you consider to:◦ Attract new students?◦ Retain students ?◦ Develop new revenue sources?
New beginning and start of the conversation Looking at follow-up opportunities for dialogue Applications are due on October 1st Big Pitch Open Session – early November Change our Story and imagine the future of our
institution Think, strategize and submit your ideas by Oct. 1