tatiane gorski - characterization of different front cravls used in triathletes
DESCRIPTION
science+triathlon, Magglingen, 2013TRANSCRIPT
14.02.2013
1
Characterization of Different Front Characterization of Different Front Crawl Variations Used by Crawl Variations Used by Crawl Variations Used by Crawl Variations Used by
Triathletes Triathletes
Tatiane GorskiTatiane Gorski11, Pedro Figueiredo, Pedro Figueiredo22
1: Competence 1: Competence CenterCenter for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases Zurich for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases Zurich 1: Competence 1: Competence CenterCenter for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases, Zurich, for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases, Zurich, Switzerland; 2: Higher Education Institute of Maia (ISMAI), Maia, Portugal.Switzerland; 2: Higher Education Institute of Maia (ISMAI), Maia, Portugal.
TriathlonIntroduction
Cumulative effects of 3 disciplines and interference(Peeling & Landers, 2009)
Effect of cycling on running (Distribution of) Intensity(Suriano et al., 2007; Bonacci et al., 2011; Etxebarria et al., 2013)
Cadence(Bernard et al 2003; Vercruyssen et al 2005)(Bernard et al., 2003; Vercruyssen et al., 2005)
Nutritional strategies(McGawley, Shannon & Betts, 2012)
Cycle frame ergonomics(Garside & Doran, 2000; Silder, Gleason & Thelen, 2011; Bisi et al., 2012)
Drafting(Vercruyssen et al., 2002)
14.02.2013
2
Swimming in TriathlonIntroduction
Low correlation swimming time x total time(Dengel et al., 1989)
Swimming intensity cycling performance(Peeling, Bishop & Landers, 2005)
Swimming position final position (bestathletes faster at early stages)athletes faster at early stages)
Inferior swimming performance effortduring cyclingrunning performance
(Vleck, Bürgi & Bentley, 2006)
Swimming in TriathlonIntroduction
Different technical abilities, wetsuit, drafting,specific strategy and preparation for theswimming‐cycling transition (Bentley et al., 2002;Millet & Vleck, 2010)
14.02.2013
3
Swimming in TriathlonIntroduction
Delextrat et al., 2003
Pelling & Landers, 2007
Different technical abilities, wetsuit, drafting,specific strategy and preparation for theswimming‐cycling transition (Bentley et al., 2002;Millet & Vleck, 2010)
Swimming in TriathlonIntroduction
Aim: comparing biomechanical and coordinative parameters of different front‐crawl variations
used in triathlon races.
Different technical abilities, wetsuit, drafting,specific strategy and preparation for theswimming‐cycling transition (Bentley et al., 2002;Millet & Vleck, 2010)
14.02.2013
4
Participants / ProtocolMethods
8 male triathletes (19.8 ± 1.9 years, 65.8 ± 4.3 kg, 1.78 ± 0.03 m)
6 x 25‐m maximal tests (pause = 5 min)
In apnea (CR)
Breathing to the right side (CR_R)
Breathing to the left side (CR_L)
With the head out of the water (HO)
HO breathing to the right side (HO_R)
HO breathing to the left side (HO_L)
Data collectionMethods
Two cameras (frontal/lateral, under the water)
Digitization of 18 anatomical landmarks
2D reconstruction
Mass center Index ofMass centervelocity (v)
Strokelength (SL)
Strokefrequency(S
F)
Index ofcoordination
(IdC)
14.02.2013
5
Index of Coordination (Chollet et al., 2000)Methods
Upper‐limbs coordination
Time between propulsive and non‐propulsive phases
Entry and catch
Pull
Push
Under the water
Recovery
IdC = time lag between propulsion of the two arms
% of total stroke cycle
Out of the water
0: opposition
<0: “catch‐up”
>0: superposition
VideosMethods
14.02.2013
6
StatisticsMethods
Repeated‐measures ANOVA
Bonferroni post‐hoc
P<0.05
Stata (10.1)Stata ( 0. )
Characterization of front‐crawl variations
Results
CR CR_R CR_L HO HO_R HO_L
V (m*s‐1) 1.60± 0.10
1.57 ± 0.12
1.56± 0.12
1.48 ± 0.12ab
1.48 ±0.13a
1.53± 0.16
SL (m) 2.14± 0.13
2.11 ± 0.08
2.23± 0.14
1.69 ± 0.08a,b,c
2.19± 0.21d
2.25 ± 0.08bd
SF (Hz) 0.76± 0.08
0.76 ± 0.08
0.70 ± 0.07
0.87 ± 0.08abc
0.69 ± 0.06a,b,d
0.68± 0.7a,b,d
IdC (%) ‐10.2 ± 3.6
‐10.8±3.6
‐13.3±3.5
‐10.6±6.7
‐11.0±5.5
‐13.9±1.9
a,b,c,d Significantly different from CR, CR_R, CR_L, and POLO, respectively (p<0.05).
14.02.2013
7
Head under vs. out of waterDiscussion
Differences in v, SL and SF = water polo players(Zamparo & Falco, 2010)
In HO:SLSF
~ water polo players (Zamparo & Falco, 2010; de Jesus et al., 2012)
Not sufficient to reach CR v.
Breathing patternsDiscussion
Head under the water: no differences
Specific training
Open water swimming: breathing frequently
Head out of the water: differences!Head out of the water: differences!
Head rotation
14.02.2013
8
Index of CoordinationDiscussion
> swimmers (Alberty et al., 2005)/ < water polo players (de Jesus et al., 2012)
No differences between technical variations
≠ Swimmers (Seifert et al., 2008)
Specialization + training specificity Specialization + training specificity
Longer distances
Swimmers:IdC over 200 m (Alberty et al., 2005)
Triathletes: Effect of velocity (Millet et al., 2002; Chollet et al., 2003)
Conclusion
Differences in biomechanical, but not incoordinative parameters
HO:SF compensatingSL
Breathing patterns affecting HOBreathing patterns affecting HOswimming, but not front‐crawl
14.02.2013
9
Practical Application
Training all technical variations used duringcompetition
“Swimming technique should be the groundworkin the multi‐year planning AND should bef d i h i i i ”focussed on in each training session” (Olbrecht, 2011)
Technical improvementperformance
Thank you!