tbpoc march 26, 2018 supplemental packet · xchris traina presented highlights of the estimated...
TRANSCRIPT
TBPOCMarch 26, 2018
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
ITEM 3
Consent Calendar
TBPOC January 23, 2018 Meeting Minutes
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
TBPOC REGULAR MEETING MINUTES3:30 PM, January 23, 2018
Bridge Yard Building 210 Burma Road, Oakland, CA 94607
1 of 5
TBPOC_012318MtgMin-final-rev1.docx
Attendees: TBPOC Members: Malcolm Dougherty (Chair), Steve Heminger, Susan Bransen PMT Members: Dan McElhinney, Andrew Fremier, Stephen Maller
Participants: Chris Traina, Stefan Galvez, Blake Sanborn, Brian Maroney, Patrick Treacy, Peter Lee, Clive Endress, Sara Kuehl, Larry Goldzband, Robert Doyle, and Karen Wang
Convened: 3:33 pm
Items Action 1. Roll Call
All TBPOC members were present. NA
2. Chair’s Report The Chair reported on the successful completions of the various projects: 504/288 spans completed demolition in May 2017, SAS T1 anchor rod grout replacement work completed in June 2017, YBITS2 Contract completed on 11/29/17, Marine Foundations Removal Contract Piers 4 through 19 completed on 12/22/17. The Chair thanked the entire Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program project team including Caltrans staff, expert consultants, resource agencies, project partners and stakeholders, MTC staff, CTC staff, and the PMT members for their successful group teamwork in all of these completion milestones in 2017. The Chair reported that per the TBPOC’s request, a letter was provided by FHWA Division Administrator Vincent Mammano outlining that FHWA participated in meeting discussions, observed field testing, and has fully reviewed the SFOBB project team’s procedures and findings documentation. FHWA officials are confident the bridge tower will function as designed.
No action.
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
(Continued)
2 of 5
TBPOC_012318MtgMin-final-rev1.docx
Items Action 3. Consent Calendar -
a) TBPOC December 12, 2017 Meeting Minutes The TBPOC approved the Consent Calendar. Motion by: Steve Heminger Second by: Susan Bransen Votes (3-0): Yes- Steve Heminger, Susan Bransen, Malcolm Dougherty; No-0
4. Marine Foundation Pier Retention (Piers E2, E19-23) – Environmental Enhancement Public Access Facilities instead of Pier Demolition
Dan McElhinney presented a brief introduction of the project team and the outline of the presentation. Blake Sanborn, project landscape architect, made a presentation on the preferred pier retention options for the YBI and Oakland shorelines. Presentation also included a recap of past TBPOC decisions on pier retention, list of stakeholders, overview of Bay trail and Water Trail, typical Bay Area local waterfront amenities, precedent pier life examples, overview of YBI shoreline site, proposed Pier E2 option, overview of Oakland shoreline site and features, Gateway Park, existing conditions, evaluated options, preferred option, site access, scale comparison, design proposal, programming opportunities, views of San Francisco Bay. The preferred option had the following benefits: maximized over-water experience, preferred by EBRPD for greatest programming opportunity, integration to Gateway Park vision, and best public asset to East Bay Community. The following project partners presented their comments in support of the proposed project such as Clive Endress (Architectural Coordinator of the New East Span), Sara Kuehl (Landscape Architect of Gateway Park), Larry Goldzband (Executive Director of BCDC), Robert Doyle (General Manager of EBRPD).Stefan Galvez presented an update on the progress and schedule of the environmental resource agency permit update. He noted that the Army Corp of Engineers is in support of public access for the retention of Piers E21 and E22, however, they would require that Piers E19 and E20 removed. Therefore, the project team is recommending the 600’ span for public access (and remove Piers E19 and 20).
The TBPOC approved Option 1 (Build public access on YBI to Pier E2 and on Oakland shoreline 600 feet long and 25 feet wide to Pier E21/23; Demo 2 Piers E19, 20), as the preferred alternative and authorized the staff to proceed and negotiate with the CMGC contractor a capital contract for a not to exceed amount of $52 million. Motion by: Steve Heminger Second by: Malcolm Dougherty Votes (2-1): Yes- Steve Heminger, Malcolm Dougherty; No-Susan Bransen
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
(Continued)
3 of 5
TBPOC_012318MtgMin-final-rev1.docx
Items Action Brian Maroney presented an overview of the project team’s recommended option design, schedule and costs. Chris Traina presented highlights of the estimated costs (capital outlay, capital outlay support and risk range). Steve Heminger pointed out potential available CO funding (savings of more than $19M) in the program (carried in the risk forecast): Richmond-San Rafael deck joint repair, Vincent Thomas funding shortfall, West Approach land sales. Steve and Malcolm agreed that they need to resolve these disputed costs. Susan Bransen expressed concern that the projected program budget deficit would become even greater if the pier retention option is approved versus imploding these foundations. “…what I heard today is just a lot of truly wonderful reasons to leave these foundations and build these piers out. But what I didn’t hear was anyone from Oakland/San Francisco Bay Area to talk about contributing to the overrun that would be created as a result of a decision that we might make to move forward on this proposal today. And for that reason, I am concerned there’s a request to go $19M over the amount budgeted and we would stay within our budget if we implode the foundations and so the question that I have for you is - has anyone approached you (project team) to contribute to the $19M overrun?” Brian Maroney responded, “no”. Susan Bransen added, “so that’s a concern because we have a responsibility to live within our means. We have a budget that is already projected to go over and we have a long list of risks.… I see that it is our charge to remove these foundations and do whatever we can to stay within budget and what I see as a Caltrans team and a PMT team that’s worked really hard to do that and you’ve done an excellent job on implosions and so it’s discouraging to be faced with this situation where we could do something really good for this generation and future generations but we do not have the means to move forward on this.” Steve Heminger commented that if “we” chose to do no public access then we would be missing a tremendous opportunity at YBI that
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
(Continued)
4 of 5
TBPOC_012318MtgMin-final-rev1.docx
Items Action would actually save money versus removing Pier E2. We value public access at the island then we ought to value it over at the Oakland shoreline. Steve Heminger moved to approve staff’s recommendation of the preferred alternative and authorize staff to negotiate a capital contract for a not to exceed amount of $52 million. Malcolm Dougherty seconded the motion. He echoed Steve’s sentiments on the value of public access. Susan Bransen commented that she would love to vote for this. “However, it is important that we adhere to the budget and we don’t make decisions that increase our deficit and for that reason, I am going to vote no on this.”
5. Public Comment / Other Business Robert Doyle of EBRPD commented that this (public access facility) will be such an attraction that will be able to raise public and private money to build out next to this. “I think this is a wise investment that I assure you that we will do everything we can to get from this investment. Thank you.”
6. Adjournment / Next Meeting The next meeting of the TBPOC will be held on February 13, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Bay Area Metro 375 Beale Street, San Francisco, CA
1st Floor, Board Room Adjourned: 5:13 pm
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
(Continued)
5 of 5
TBPOC_012318MtgMin-final-rev1.docx
TBPOC REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 3:30pm, January 23, 2017
APPROVED BY:
_________________________________________ ______________ MALCOLM DOUGHERTY, TBPOC Chair DateDirector, California Department of Transportation
_________________________________________ ______________ SUSAN BRANSEN DateExecutive Director, California Transportation Commission
_________________________________________ ______________ STEVE HEMINGER, Date Executive Director, Bay Area Toll Authority
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
ITEM 4
Marine Foundation Pier Retention (Piers E2, E19 23)Environmental Enhancement Public Access Facilities
Instead of Pier Demolition
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
1TB
PO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 S
uppl
emen
tal P
acke
t
1
TBP
OC
Out
com
e 1/
23/1
8:
The
TBP
OC
app
rove
d by
a v
ote
of 2
-1 (2
vot
es y
es, 1
no)
staf
f’s re
com
men
datio
n of
the
pref
erre
d al
tern
ativ
e* a
nd
auth
oriz
ed s
taff
to p
roce
ed w
ith th
e pr
ojec
t and
to n
egot
iate
aca
pita
l con
tract
for a
not
to e
xcee
d am
ount
of $
52 m
illion
with
the
CM
GC
cont
ract
or.
*Pre
ferr
ed a
ltern
ativ
e: B
uild
pub
lic a
cces
s fa
cilit
ies
on Y
BI
(Pie
r E2)
and
the
Oak
land
sho
relin
e (P
iers
E21
-23;
600
feet
long
and
25
feet
wid
e) a
nd d
emol
ish
the
two
rem
aini
ng p
iers
E19
and
E20
.TB
PO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 S
uppl
emen
tal P
acke
t
Wor
k Lo
catio
n
2TB
PO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 S
uppl
emen
tal P
acke
t
Pier
sE1
9–
E23
Wor
k Lo
catio
n
3TB
PO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 S
uppl
emen
tal P
acke
t
Rem
ove
Pier
s E1
9 &
E20
by
Hig
hly
Con
trol
led
Impl
osio
n
4TB
PO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 S
uppl
emen
tal P
acke
t
Sche
dule
5
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N F
OR
TB
POC
A
PPR
OVA
L
6
In fo
llow
up
to th
e Ja
nuar
y 23
, 201
8 TB
PO
C a
ppro
val o
f
pier
rete
ntio
n sc
ope
and
TBP
OC
dire
ctio
n to
pro
ceed
,
nego
tiate
and
pre
pare
a c
onst
ruct
ion
cont
ract
to b
uild
out
a pu
blic
acc
ess
obse
rvat
ion
stru
ctur
es a
t Pie
r E2,
rem
ove
exis
ting
Pie
rs E
19 a
nd E
20, a
nd b
uild
out
a p
ublic
acc
ess
obse
rvat
ion
stru
ctur
e be
twee
n P
iers
E23
and
E21
, the
PM
T re
com
men
ds T
BP
OC
app
rova
l of t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
cont
ract
as
nego
tiate
d du
ring
Febr
uary
and
Mar
ch 2
018
CM
GC
cost
est
imat
ing
and
revi
ew m
eetin
gs.
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
TBPO
C R
eque
st
7
App
rova
l is
requ
este
d to
exe
cute
a c
ontra
ct fo
r $52
milli
on th
atha
s no
w b
een
nego
tiate
d w
ith th
e B
ay B
ridge
CM
GC
cont
ract
orK
M a
s pr
evio
usly
app
rove
d as
a n
ot to
exc
eed
budg
et a
mou
nt o
nJa
nuar
y 23
to c
ompl
ete:
1)R
emov
al o
f Pie
rs E
19 &
E20
by
the
dem
o pr
ojec
t’s h
ighl
yco
ntro
lled
impl
osio
n m
etho
d,2)
aspr
esen
ted
build
out
a p
ublic
acc
ess
faci
lity
from
the
YB
Ish
orel
ine
to P
ier E
2, a
nd3)
as p
rese
nted
bui
ld o
ut a
pub
lic a
cces
sfa
cilit
y fro
m th
eO
akla
nd s
hore
line
Pie
r E23
to P
ier E
21.
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
ITEM 5
Program Budget/Risks Management Update for FY 17 18(Capital Outlay/Capital Outlay Support/Risk
Management)
TBPOC March 26, 2018 Supplemental Packet
Item
5
Pro
gram
Bud
get/R
isks
Upd
ate
for F
Y 17
/18
(Cap
ital O
utla
y/ C
apita
l Out
lay
Sup
port/
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t)
1
Mar
ch26
, 201
8
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Four
Key
Dec
isio
ns S
aved
Thr
ee Y
ears
Of C
OS
Cos
ts
TBPO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 –
Item
5
•4
Key
Stra
tegi
c an
d In
nova
tive
Dec
isio
ns b
y th
e TB
PO
C h
ave
enab
led
the
Pro
ject
Te
am to
cut
at l
east
thre
e ye
ars
off O
ld B
ay B
ridge
Dem
oliti
on S
ched
ule:
1.20
14 A
ccel
erat
e S
teel
Tru
ss C
antil
ever
Dis
man
tling
(Bet
wee
n P
iers
E
2/E
3) b
y 1
year
.2.
2014
Allo
win
g C
altra
ns to
pur
sue
mar
ine
foun
datio
n de
mol
ition
by
impl
osio
n co
ntro
lled
char
ges
inst
ead
of la
rge
coffe
rdam
s.3.
2015
Pro
curin
g by
CM
GC
con
tract
has
sav
ed a
t lea
st 1
yea
r in
perm
ittin
g.4.
2017
obt
aini
ng p
erm
its to
allo
w m
ultip
le p
ier d
emo
even
ts, s
avin
g 1
year
an
d ov
er $
10M
.
•Th
ese
deci
sion
s ha
ve s
aved
over
$90
in c
onve
ntio
nal d
emol
ition
cos
ts, $
60 m
illio
n in
retir
ed c
apita
l ris
ks a
nd3
or m
ore
year
s of
add
ed ti
me/
supp
ort c
osts
.
2
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Brid
ge D
emo
CO
S &
CO
For
ecas
t Im
prov
emen
ts
TBPO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 –
Item
5
Dem
oliti
on C
OS
& C
O F
orec
asts
Sin
ce Q
3 20
16 (B
efor
e D
emo
Adv
ance
men
t) 3
Q3
2016
CO
S Fo
reca
stQ
420
17 C
OS
Fore
cast
Fore
cast
Red
uctio
ns50
4/28
8 C
OS
$20.
5M$1
0.6M
$9.9
M50
4/28
8 C
apita
l$9
7.4M
$81.
8M$1
5.6M
MF
E4 to
E18
CO
S$3
3.6M
$11.
8M$2
1.8M
MF
E4 to
E18
Cap
ital
$158
.9M
$111
.7M
$47.
2MTo
tal
$94.
5M
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
4
SFO
BB
Eas
t Spa
n Pr
ojec
tsFY
17/
18 C
OS
Stat
e St
aff a
nd A
&&
E C
ontr
acts
Bud
get A
ctio
n Pl
an (S
ep 2
017)
Bas
ed o
n 08
/29
TBPO
C A
lloca
tion
vs. B
udge
t Req
uest
Dec
isio
n
TBPO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 –
Item
5
Contracts
FY17/18
FTE
FY17/18
BudgetDlrs
Work
Description
Division
Contract
Vendor
Scopeof
Services
Task
Manager
FY17/18
BudgetDlrs
CONST
TBConst
D04
10.26
$2,515
04A4712
AECOM
Env
StefanG.
$1,800
TBConst
D59
4.41
$1,179
04A4969
BROWNANDCALD
WELL
Env
HardeepT.
$1,502
CONST
1.89
$386
04A3970
SFBayConser.&Dev.Comm
Env
StefanG.
$80
CONST
Total
16.6
$4,080
04A4312
WRECO
Env
HardeepT.
$0
TBDGN
TBDGN
2.67
$850
04A4506
WATERBOARD
Env
HardeepT.
$115
TOLL
BRDGNTotal
2.7
$850
04A4535
IBR
Env
StefanG.
$30
Dist4Support
DESIGN
0.40
$86
04.0135CM
Kiewit/M
ansonJV
Design
ChrisT.
$0
MGMT
3.19
$960
04A0148
PBAMERICASINC
Design
JohnU.
$400
ENV
3.55
$845
59A0040
TYLINM/N
JVDesign
HasanE.
$433
EXT_AFFAIRS
0.19
$36
METS
04A4542
ALTAVISTA
METS
KeithH.
$440
ROW
0.46
$110
GEO
04A4534
EMI
Geotech
Eng
SabaM.
$1,000
TRAFFIC
OPER
0.72
$210
CONST
04A4611
CH2M
HILL
Claims
DeannaV.
$200
MAINT
0.09
$19
MGMT
04A4265
CALTROPENG.Risk
RiskMgm
tPatrickT.
$90
ADMIN
0.03
$5
04A5045
HNTB
Mgm
tDanM.
$812
Dist4SupportTotal
8.6
$2,270
REGULARPROJECTSTotal
$6,902
ENGRSVCSSupport
ENGRSVCSDGN
0.79
$173
ENV
04A4712
AECOM
ENV
StefanG.
$20
ENGRSVCSMETS/GEO
1.05
$221
DESIGN
59A0040
TYLINM/N
JVDesign
HasanE.
$30
ENGRSVCSMGMT
0.17
$48
METS
04A4542
ALTAVISTA
METS
KeithH.
$50
ENGRSVCSOE
0.24
$59
RODS/GROUTREPAIR
Total
$100
ENGRSVCSSupportTotal
2.3
$501
CATHODIC
PROTECTION
DESIGN
59A0040
TYLINM/N
JVDesign
HasanE.
$550
REGULARPROJECTSTotal
30.1
$7,702
CATHODIC
PROTECTIONTotal
$550
CONST
TBConst
D04
0.62
$152
ENV
04A4712
AECOM
ENV
StefanG.
$250
TBConst
D59
0.90
$240
DESIGN
04.0135CM
Kiewit/M
ansonJV
Design
ChrisT.
$450
CONST
0.06
$12
PIERRETENTION(E2,E19to
E23)Total
$700
CONST
Total
1.6
$404
GrandTotal
$8,252
TBDGN
TBDGN
0.06
$20
TOLL
BRDGNTotal
0.1
$20
Dist4Support
MGMT
0.19
$58
ActionNotes(9/01/2017):
Dist4SupportTotal
0.2
$58
1.Finalizetask
orderswithA&Efirm
sto
deliver
therequired
scopeofservices
toachieve
needed
tasks
ENGRSVCSSupport
ENGRSVCSMETS/GEO
0.23
$48
withinbudget
foreach
contract.
ENGRSVCSSupportTotal
0.23
$48
2.Revisealltask
ordersto
bewithinthebudgetActionPlanofeachcontractandto
endonJune30,2018.
RODS/GROUTREPAIR
Total
2.06
$530
3.U
pdatedbudgetallocationshownbased
oninputfrom
task
managersandcontractmanagersSept2017.
TBDGN
TBDGN
0.50
$159
4.Expenditure
dataisavailablewithin34weeks
fortheexpenditure
month
withpendinginvoices
TBD.
TOLL
BRDGNTotal
0.5
$159
Dist4Support
MGMT
0.19
$56
TOLL
BRDGNTotal
0.2
$56
CATHODIC
PROTECTIONTotal
0.7
$216
TBDGN
TBDGN
0.79
$250
TOLL
BRDGNTotal
0.8
$250
Dist4Support
MGMT
0.17
$50
TOLL
BRDGNTotal
0.2
$50
PIERRETENTION(E2,E19to
E23)Total
1.0
$300
GrandTotal
33.8
$8,748
AdditionalNotes*:
1.A
ssumptionsinthisCOSBudgetActionPlanincludenocontingency
orrisk
reserveforscopeorschedulechangesat
thistime,asthese
changeswillonly
bepresentedas
separatefuture
budgetrequestsifunmitigatedrisks,scopeorschedulechangesoccur.
2.COSsavingswithincontractslistedabove
willbeshiftedto
othercontractswithinthesamelistifneeded.
3.A&EBudgetslistedwere
developedintask
orderdiscussionsto
balance
workload,expertise,andcosteffectivenesswithinbudgetsshown.
PIERRETENTION
(E2,E19to
E23)
PIERRETENTION
(E2,E19to
E23)
Table2
A&EContractsPlanDetail($
inthousands)
CATHODIC
PROTECTION
Table1
StateStaffPlanDetail($
inthousands)
RODS/GROUT
REPAIR
Division
REGULAR
PROJECTS
DESIGN
ENV
REGULARPROJECTS
RODS/GROUTREPAIR
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
5
TBPO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 –
Item
5SF
OB
B E
ast S
pan
Proj
ects
FY 1
7/18
CO
S St
ate
Staf
f and
A&
&E
Con
trac
tsB
udge
t Act
ion
Plan
(Mar
ch 2
018)
(With
Exp
endi
ture
dat
a th
ru F
eb 2
018)
Contracts
FY17/18
FTE
FY17/18
BudgetDlrs
ExpPY
thru
Feb
Exp
Dlrs
thru
Feb
Work
Description
Division
Contract
Ven
dor
Scopeof
Services
Task
Man
ager
FY17/18
BudgetDlrs
Estimated
Work
FY17/18
thru
Feb
CONST
TBConst
D04
10.26
$2,515
8.33
$1,840
04A4712
AEC
OM
Env
Stefan
G.
$1,800
$1,063
TBConst
D59
4.41
$1,179
2.67
$722
04A4969
BROWNANDCALD
WELL
Env
Hardeep
T.$1,502
$1,183
CONST
1.89
$386
1.43
$290
04A3970
SFBay
Conser.&
Dev.C
omm
Env
Stefan
G.
$80
$23
CONST
Total
16.6
$4,080
12.43
$2,853
04A4312
WREC
OEnv
Hardeep
T.$0
$0TB
DGN
TBDGN
2.67
$850
1.40
$434
04AA5133
WATERBOARD
Env
Hardeep
T.$115
$54
TOLL
BRDGNTo
tal
2.7
$850
1.40
$434
04A4535
IBR
Env
Stefan
G.
$30
$23
Dist4Support
DESIGN
0.40
$86
0.23
$41
04.0135C
MKiew
it/M
ansonJV
Design
ChrisT.
$0$0
MGMT
3.19
$960
1.57
$490
04A0148
PBAMER
ICASINC
Design
John
U.
$400
$378
ENV
3.55
$845
1.87
$472
59A0040
TYLINM/N
JVDesign
Hasan
E.$433
$0EXT_AFFAIRS
0.19
$36
0.45
$60
METS
04A4542
ALTAVISTA
METS
KeithH.
$1,235
$1,051
ROW
0.46
$110
0.32
$68
GEO
04A4534
EMI
Geo
tech
Eng
Saba
M.
$705
$603
TRAFFIC
OPER
0.72
$210
0.11
$29
CONST
04A4611
CH2M
HILL
Claims
DeannaV.
$200
$164
MAINT
0.09
$19
0.06
$8MGMT
04A4265
CALTROPEN
G.R
isk
RiskMgm
tPatrickT.
$90
$74
ADMIN
0.03
$50.02
$704A5045
HNTB
Mgm
tDan
M.
$812
$280
Dist4SupportTo
tal
8.6
$2,270
4.64
$1,176
Others
04A4952
ALTAVISTA
MatlsTesting
CatalinoN.
$25
ENGRSVCSSupport
ENGRSVCSDGN
0.79
$173
0.03
$5REG
ULARPR
OJECTS
Total
$7,402
$4,921
ENGRSVCSMETS/GEO
1.05
$221
0.50
$121
04A4712
AEC
OM
ENV
Stefan
G.
$20
$0EN
GRSVCSMGMT
0.17
$48
0.15
$56
04A4969
BROWNANDCALD
WELL
Env
Hardeep
T.$0
$0EN
GRSVCSOE
0.24
$59
0.00
$0DESIGN
59A0040
TYLINM/N
JVDesign
Hasan
E.$30
$7EN
GRSVCSPO
LICY
0.00
$0METS
04A4542
ALTAVISTA
METS
KeithH.
$50
$47
ENGRSVCSSupportTo
tal
2.3
$501
0.68
$182
RODS/GROUTREPAIR
Total
$100
$54
REG
ULARPR
OJECTS
Total
30.1
$7,702
19.15
$4,644
CATH
ODIC
PROTECTION
DESIGN
59A0040
TYLINM/N
JVDesign
Hasan
E.$550
$233
CONST
TBConst
D04
0.62
$152
0.35
$87
CATH
ODIC
PROTECTIONTo
tal
$550
$233
TBConst
D59
0.90
$240
0.85
$206
04A4712
AEC
OM
ENV
Stefan
G.
$818
$503
CONST
0.06
$12
0.04
$12
04A4969
BROWNANDCALD
WELL
Env
Hardeep
T.$270
$0CONST
Total
1.6
$404
1.25
$305
METS
04A4542
ALTAVISTA
METS
KeithH.
$400
$0TB
DGN
TBDGN
0.06
$20
GEO
04A4534
EMI
Geo
tech
Eng
Saba
M.
$123
$110
TOLL
BRDGNTo
tal
0.1
$20
0.00
$0DESIGN
04.0135C
MKiew
it/M
ansonJV
Design
ChrisT.
$455
$146
Dist4Support
MGMT
0.19
$58
0.19
$59
Others
$135
$0Dist4SupportTo
tal
0.2
$58
0.19
$59
PIER
RETEN
TION(E2,E19to
E23)To
tal
$2,200
$759
ENGRSVCSSupport
ENGRSVCSMETS/GEO
0.23
$48
0.14
$31
Grand
Total
$10,252
$5,966
ENGRSVCSSupportTo
tal
0.23
$48
0.14
$31
RODS/GROUTREPAIR
Total
2.06
$530
1.58
$396
CONST
TBCONST
D04
0.01
$2ActionNotes(12/21/2017):
CONST
Total
0.01
$21.Finalizetask
orderswithA&Efirmsto
deliver
therequiredscopeofservicesto
achieve
needed
tasks
TBDGN
TBDGN
0.50
$159
0.20
$57
withinbud
getforeach
contract.
TOLL
BRDGNTo
tal
0.5
$159
0.20
$57
2.Revisealltaskordersto
bewithinthebud
getActionPlan
ofeach
contractandto
endonJune30,2018.
Dist4Support
MGMT
0.19
$56
0.10
$29
3.U
pdatedbudgetallocationshownbased
oninputfrom
task
managersandcontractmanagersSept2017.
TOLL
BRDGNTo
tal
0.2
$56
0.10
$29
4.Expenditure
dataisavailablewithin34weeks
fortheexpenditure
month
withpendinginvoices
TBD
CATH
ODIC
PROTECTIONTo
tal
0.7
$216
0.31
$88
CONST
CONST
1.56
$400
0.14
$36
1.6
$400
0.14
$36
TBDGN
TBDGN
2.27
$581
1.09
$320
TOLL
BRDGNTo
tal
2.3
$581
1.09
$320
Dist4Support
MGMT/TR
AFFIC
1.76
$450
0.84
$211
Dist4Support
1.8
$450
0.84
$211
ENGRSVCSSupport
ENGRSVCSDGN/M
GMT
1.44
$369
0.88
$213
ENGRSVCSSupportTo
tal
1.4
$369
0.88
$213
PIER
RETEN
TION(E2,E19to
E23)To
tal
7.0
$1,800
2.94
$780
Grand
Total
39.9
$10,248
23.98
$5,908
AdditionalNotes*:
1.A
ssumptions
inthisCOSBudgetActionPlanincludenocontingency
orrisk
reserveforscopeorschedulechangesat
thistime,as
thesechangeswillonly
bepresentedas
separatefuture
budgetrequestsifunmitigated
risks,scopeorschedulechangesoccur.
2.COSsavings
withincontractslistedabove
willbeshiftedto
other
contractswithinthesamelistifneeded.
3.A&EBudgetslistedweredeveloped
intask
order
discussionsto
balance
workload,expertise,andcosteffectivenesswithinbudgetsshown.
Table2
A&ECo
ntractsPlanDetail($
inthousands)
Division
REG
ULAR
PROJECTS
REG
ULARPR
OJECTS
ENV
DESIGN
RODS/GROUTREPAIR
ENV
RODS/GROUT
REPAIR
PIER
RETEN
TION
(E2,E19to
E23)
ENV
CATH
ODIC
PROTECTION
PIER
RETEN
TION
(E2,E19to
E23)
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
6
TBPO
C M
arch
, 201
8 –
Item
5
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
7
TBPO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 –
Item
5
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
8
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Con
stru
ctio
n Su
ppor
tPr
ojec
t Sup
port
CO
For
ecas
t ($i
n m
illion
s)92
100
15C
apita
l ($
in m
illion
s)3.
57.
14.
58.
07.
88.
439
.731
8.5
351.
031
2.8
347.
246
4.2
539.
554
4.8
441.
352
2.1
253.
923
8.8
261.
597
.273
.612
9.7
0.0
60.0
120.
018
0.0
240.
030
0.0
360.
042
0.0
480.
054
0.0
600.
0C
apita
l ($
in m
illion
s)
CO
For
ecas
t ($i
n m
illion
s)
CO
S Fo
reca
st ($
in m
illion
s)$2
0.5
$14.
0$9
.8C
OS
($ in
milli
ons)
$5.1
$12.
1$2
1.2
$46.
3$3
9.5
$36.
1$2
9.9
$47.
7$6
9.8
$58.
0$6
3.8
$75.
8$1
09.3
$118
.1$1
19.5
$107
.6$1
01.7
$80.
6$8
2.4
$44.
1$2
4.4
$18.
0$0
.0
$20.
0
$40.
0
$60.
0
$80.
0
$100
.0
$120
.0
$140
.0
$160
.0
$180
.0
$200
.0C
OS
($ in
milli
ons)
CO
S Fo
reca
st ($
in m
illion
s)
Expe
nditu
re th
ru D
ec 2
017
CO
and
CO
S C
ash
Flow
for E
ast S
pan
Proj
ects
To
ll Br
idge
Sei
smic
Ret
rofit
Pro
gram
Proj
ect
East
Bay
Rep
lace
men
t 01
20F,
SAS
-Sup
erst
ruct
ure
3K11
0, A
ncho
r Rod
s G
rout
ing
0120
T, Y
BITS
2-C
ant.
dism
ant.
0135
2, S
uper
stru
ctur
e D
ism
.01
354,
Pie
r 3 R
emov
al D
emo.
0135
7, P
ier E
4-E1
8.01
358,
Pie
r E2,
E19
-E22
.C
ompl
eted
Pro
ject
s
1/186
/20
11/1
45/
21
CO
For
ecas
t ($i
n m
illion
s)92
100
15C
apita
l ($
in m
illion
s)3.
57.
14.
58.
07.
88.
439
.731
8.5
351.
031
2.8
347.
246
4.2
539.
554
4.8
441.
352
2.1
253.
923
8.8
261.
597
.273
.612
9.7
0.0
60.0
120.
018
0.0
240.
030
0.0
360.
042
0.0
480.
054
0.0
600.
0C
apita
l ($
in m
illion
s)
CO
For
ecas
t ($i
n m
illion
s)
CO
S Fo
reca
st ($
in m
illion
s)$2
0.5
$14.
0$9
.8C
OS
($ in
milli
ons)
$5.1
$12.
1$2
1.2
$46.
3$3
9.5
$36.
1$2
9.9
$47.
7$6
9.8
$58.
0$6
3.8
$75.
8$1
09.3
$118
.1$1
19.5
$107
.6$1
01.7
$80.
6$8
2.4
$44.
1$2
4.4
$18.
0$0
.0
$20.
0
$40.
0
$60.
0
$80.
0
$100
.0
$120
.0
$140
.0
$160
.0
$180
.0
$200
.0C
OS
($ in
milli
ons)
CO
S Fo
reca
st ($
in m
illion
s)
Dat
e: 0
2/01
/201
8
CAP
ITAL
Cur
rent
App
rove
d Bu
dget
: $5,
177.
7M
For
ecas
t at C
ompl
etio
n: $
5,17
5.1M
Exp
endi
ture
thru
Dec
201
7: $
5,02
9.5M
Not
es: 1
) CO
and
CO
S fo
reca
sts
are
base
d on
4th
QTR
201
7 Fi
nanc
ial a
nd R
isk
Man
agem
ent R
epor
ts.
2
) For
ecas
ts in
clud
e 4t
h Q
TR 2
017
risk
of $
17.8
M C
OS.
3
) CO
S fo
reca
sts
for f
utur
e ye
ars
is b
eing
eva
luat
ed to
redu
ce u
p to
25%
.
4) T
otal
For
ecas
t & E
xpen
ditu
re in
clud
es $
6.37
1M th
at T
BPO
C a
utho
rized
BAT
A to
spe
nd o
n th
e So
uthg
ate
Roa
d
5) 1
8/19
Fis
cal Y
ear E
xpen
ditu
res
assu
mes
SAS
arb
itrat
ion
gets
reso
lved
by
June
201
9.
SU
PPO
RT
Cur
rent
App
rove
d Bu
dget
: $1,
349.
4M
Fore
cast
at C
ompl
etio
n: $
1,36
7.2M
Expe
nditu
re th
ru D
ec 2
017:
$1,
331.
5M
TBPO
C M
arch
, 201
8 –
Item
5
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
TBPO
C M
arch
26,
201
8 –
Item
5
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
FY 1
7/18
CO
S B
udge
tR
ecom
men
datio
n B
ased
on
the
Bud
get C
hang
e Ta
ble
Pres
ente
d:
• Sta
ff re
com
men
ds a
ppro
val o
f the
Bud
get C
hang
e fo
r CO
as
pres
ente
d w
ith th
e ca
pita
l bud
get s
avin
gs (i
.e. $
62.1
4 m
illio
n) to
be
set a
side
for
Mar
ine
Foun
datio
n P
iers
E2,
E19
to E
23 E
nviro
nmen
tal E
nhan
cem
ent
Pub
lic A
cces
s Fa
cilit
ies
fund
ing,
suc
h th
at $
52 m
illio
n is
for t
he a
ppro
ved
cont
ract
allo
tmen
t and
the
rem
aind
er a
s pr
ojec
t cap
ital r
isk
only.
• Sta
ff re
com
men
ds a
ppro
val o
f the
Bud
get C
hang
e fo
r CO
S a
s pr
esen
ted
with
the
prog
ram
sav
ings
of $
3.02
milli
on C
OS
to b
e tra
nsfe
rred
to th
e S
FOB
B E
ast S
pan
CO
S B
udge
t.
• Sta
ff pr
ovid
esin
follo
w u
p to
the
Janu
ary
23 P
ier R
eten
tion
supp
lem
enta
l CO
S b
udge
t $9
milli
on p
endi
ng re
ques
t to
com
plet
e th
e pi
er re
tent
ion
wor
k by
ear
ly 2
019
-the
PM
T is
stil
l eva
luat
ing
the
over
all
good
17/
18 F
Y C
OS
bud
get s
avin
gs tr
end.
The
PM
T w
ill pr
ovid
e an
up
date
or a
redu
ced
requ
est f
or th
e pi
er re
tent
ion
com
plet
ion
CO
S
supp
lem
enta
l bud
get a
t the
May
201
8 TB
PO
C m
eetin
g fo
r thi
s FY
and
FY
18/
19 b
udge
t..
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
TBP
OC
Bri
efin
gR
isk
Man
agem
ent
Res
ults
Four
th Q
uart
er 2
017
TBP
OC
Mee
ting,
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Pre
sent
ed B
y P
atric
k Tr
eacy
, SFO
BB
Ris
k M
anag
er
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Toll
Pro
gram
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t
•Q
uart
erly
Rep
ortin
g Si
nce
Q1
2006
48th
Rep
ort t
o TB
PO
C o
n st
atus
of r
isks
in p
rogr
amS
ince
200
6 P
roje
ct T
eam
s ha
ve id
entif
ied
2,03
2 R
isks
in 2
3 P
roje
cts
•C
urre
ntly
Qua
ntify
ing
Ris
ks o
n 5
Proj
ects
and
the
Prog
ram
89 A
ctiv
e R
isks
Bei
ng Q
uant
ified
Eac
h Q
uarte
r53
Act
ive
Cap
ital O
utla
y R
isks
36 A
ctiv
e C
ost o
f Sup
port
(CO
S) R
isks
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Sum
mar
y of
Q4
2017
Cos
t Ri
sk R
esul
tsAd
equa
cy o
f Re
serv
es
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Sum
mar
y O
f Q4
Cha
nges
$47.
5 M
illio
n Im
prov
emen
t in
“Bot
tom
-line
” th
is Q
uart
er
•$3
1.9
mill
ion
decr
ease
to C
apita
l Out
lay
Fore
cast
in Q
4 20
17$3
1.2
mill
ion
redu
ctio
n on
Mar
ine
Foun
datio
ns fo
reca
st$2
.4 m
illio
n re
duct
ion
on Y
BIT
S #
2 fo
reca
st$2
.6 m
illio
n in
crea
se in
Pro
gram
-leve
l ris
ks
•$1
5.6
mill
ion
decr
ease
in C
apita
l Out
lay
Sup
port
Fore
cast
in Q
4 20
17$1
2.0
mill
ion
redu
ctio
n in
Mar
ine
Stru
ctur
e D
ism
antli
ng E
4-E
18 C
OS
risk
s
•$1
4.77
Mill
ion
Rem
aini
ng in
Pro
gram
Con
tinge
ncy
Q4
2017
$3.0
mill
ion
redu
ctio
n fo
r CO
S B
udge
t Inc
reas
e (T
BP
OC
Dec
12,
201
7) s
till p
endi
ng
•C
ost o
f Pie
r Ret
entio
n E
xcee
ding
Cos
t of P
ier D
emol
ition
not
in P
rogr
am F
orec
ast
Ext
ra C
ost o
f Pie
r E2,
E21
and
E22
rete
ntio
n no
t in
Pro
gram
For
ecas
t: W
ill in
crea
se Q
1 20
18
Fore
cast
by
appr
ox. $
16 m
illio
n.
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Q4
RM
C R
esul
ts
Q42017
Q32017
Change
%Ch
ange
MarineStructureDism
antling
E4E18
500,000
19,548,000
(19,048,000)
(97)
MarineStructureDism
antling
E1922
4,200,000
7,435,000
(3,235,000)
(44)
MarineStructureRe
tentionE2
5,998,000
14,871,000
(8,873,000)
(60)
SelfAn
chor
Suspen
sion
35,000,000
35,000,000
00
504'&288'Stee
lStructuresD
ismantling
220,000
233,000
(13,000)
(6)
YBI#2Po
stTraffic
Switch
233,000
2,618,000
(2,385,000)
(91)
TotalEastSpan
46,151,000
79,705,000
(33,554,000)
(42)
Program
levelrisks
(not
inacontract)
16,135,000
13,564,000
2,571,000
19TotalCapita
lOutlayRisk
62,286,000
93,269,000
(30,983,000)
(33)
COSRisks
20,000,000
35,600,000
(15,600,000)
(44)
TotalRisk
82,286,000
128,869,000
(46,583,000)
(36)
Draw
onProgramCo
ntingency
21,816,000
69,229,000
( 47,413,000)
(68)
ContractCo
ntingency
60,470,000
59,640,000
830,000
ProgramCo
ntingencyBalance
14,770,000
14,770,000
0TotalCon
tingency
75,240,000
74,410,000
830,000
50%Prob
ableRisk
Managem
entC
ost
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Q4
CO
S C
hang
es
Q42017
Q32017
Change
SAS
7.3
26.2
(18.9)
SASAn
chor
RodRe
grou
ting
(0.7)
0.0
(0.7)
YBID
etou
r0.0
0.0
0.0
YBITS#1
(1.2)
(1.2)
0.0
YBITS#2
(0.1)
(2.9)
2.8
OTD
#2(0.2)
(0.2)
0.0
OTD
Detour
(0.1)
(0.1)
0.0
Program
level
12.0
10.7
1.3
Can
tilev
er D
ism
antli
ng(0.04)
0.0
(0.04)
504/
288
Dis
man
tling
(0.4)
(7.3)
6.9
Mar
ine
Foun
datio
ns P
aren
t(31.7)
(31.7)
0.0
Mar
ine
Foun
datio
ns E
4-E
1811.8
23.8
(12.0)
Mar
ine
Foun
datio
ns E
2, E
19-E
2217.8
12.8
5.0
E-3
Dem
onst
ratio
n4.0
4.0
0.0
TotalEastSpan
18.5
34.1
(15.6)
WestA
pproach
0.0
0.0
0.0
Antio
ch
Dumbarton
1.5
1.5
0.0
TotalCOSRisk
20.0
35.6
(15.6)
Contract
50%Prob
ableCO
SDifferen
tial*($M)
* C
OS
Cos
t Diff
eren
tial i
s m
easu
red
from
the
curre
nt C
OS
Bud
get
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Dra
w T
rend
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Pro
gram
Bal
ance
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Rec
ent C
hang
es in
Dra
w T
rend
Dra
w T
rend
Impr
ovin
g Fo
r Las
t Eig
ht Q
uart
ers
•Fo
reca
st P
rogr
am C
ontin
genc
y de
ficit
at p
rogr
am c
ompl
etio
n de
crea
sed
by
$47.
5 m
illio
n th
is q
uarte
r to
$7.0
mill
ion
•Fo
reca
st d
efic
it ha
s de
crea
sed
by $
136.
2 m
illion
(95%
) fro
m p
eak
of $
143.
2 m
illio
n in
Q3
2015
Impr
ovem
ent A
ttrib
utab
le T
o M
inim
izin
g D
elay
s &
Adv
anci
ng W
ork
•E
3 C
ontra
ct: N
o D
elay
s To
Con
tract
•50
4’/2
88’ C
ontra
ct: C
CO
Del
ays
& W
eath
er D
ays
Miti
gate
d•
E4-
E18
Con
tract
: No
CC
O o
r Wea
ther
Del
ays
Tren
d W
ill C
hang
e in
Q1
2018
for P
ier R
eten
tion
•A
ll th
ings
bei
ng e
qual
, pro
ject
team
will
exp
ect P
rogr
am F
orec
ast C
ost t
o in
crea
se b
y $1
6 m
illio
n (in
clud
ing
risks
) as
a re
sult
of T
BP
OC
act
ion
on P
ier
Ret
entio
n.
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
50%
Pro
babl
e R
isk
vs. R
emai
ning
Con
tinge
ncy
50%Prob
able
Risk
($M)
Remaining
Contract
Contingency($M)
Draw
onProgram
Contingency($M)
OTD
1Westbou
nd2.47
(2.47)
Skyw
ay1.07
(1.07)
Stormwater
1.37
(1.37)
WestA
pproach
1.90
(1.90)
SouthSouthDe
tour
(0.05)
0.05
OTD
Detour
0.30
(0.30)
OTD
2Eastbo
und
1.37
(1.37)
SelfAn
chor
Suspension
35.00
32.90
2.10
SASTower
RodGrou
ting
3.12
(3.12)
E2/T1
(0.01)
0.01
YBI#1MainlineStructures
(0.11)
0.11
YBI#2Po
stTraffic
Switc
h0.23
1.06
(0.83)
Pier
E3De
mon
stratio
n0.66
(0.66)
504'&28
8'SteelStructuresDism
antling
0.22
21.90
(21.68
)MarineStructures
Dism
antling
E4E18
0.50
20.30
(19.80
)Du
mba
rton
1.73
(1.73)
Antio
ch0.01
(0.01)
Subm
arineCa
ble
(0.04)
0.04
Cantile
verD
isman
tling
Completed
Projects
35.95
89.95
(54.00
)YBI#3
0.00
Program
levelrisks
(not
inacontract)
16.14
16.14
COSRisks
20.00
20.00
Righto
fway
andMitigatio
n2.40
(2.40)
ProjectInd
irects
4.52
(4.52)
Miscella
neou
sCo
ntingencies
3.60
(3.60)
MarineStructures
E2Retention/Dism
antling
E19E22
10.20
(40.00
)50
.20
Ongoing
Projects
46.34
(29.48
)75
.82
Totals
82.29
60.47
21.82
14.77
ProgramCo
ntingencyBa
lance($M)
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Top
10 R
isks
Tota
l ran
ges
from
$10
-110
M
Optim
istic
Pessim
istic
Prob
able
SAS
1000
ProjectC
lose
Out
100%
065
,000
,000
35,000
,000
Program
87VincentTho
mas
Bridge
Fund
ingshortfa
ll10
0%8,10
0,00
08,10
0,00
08,10
0,00
0Program
70Residu
alworkon
EastSpan
that
iscurrently
not
45%
020
,000
,000
4,50
0,00
0Program
65Cleanu
p/c
lose
outo
fCorrido
ronYBI
95%
1,52
0,00
05,40
0,00
03,18
9,00
0Program
84Organ
isationa
lcha
nges
lead
toprogramdelays
45%
010
,000
,000
1,77
0,00
0Program
1000
Residu
alWorkon
Oakland
Side:O
akland
Mole&
100%
1,00
0,00
02,50
0,00
01,76
7,00
0Marine*
904
CapitalC
osto
fscheduledelays
intheCo
nstructi
100%
640,00
02,52
0,00
01,54
7,00
0Program
67Renewal
ofPier
7Agreem
enta
ndDe
mob
ilizatio
n50
%1,00
0,00
05,30
0,00
01,21
7,00
0Program
65.1
CloseOut
ofDT
SCSite11
onYBI
100%
210,00
01,86
0,00
01,03
7,00
0Program
56Future
CCOsforM
EPSystem
s10
0%0
2,00
0,00
01,00
0,00
0Total
59,127
,000
*MarineFoun
datio
nsE2
Retention
Top10
CapitalO
utlayRisks
Project
IDTitle
Prob
ability
Cost
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
“Cos
ts” c
arrie
d in
Ris
k Fo
reca
stD
ata
from
Q4
2018
Qua
rterly
Rep
ort:
Fore
cast
to C
ompl
etio
n:
$8,9
59.1
mill
ion
Cos
t To
Dat
e:$8
,733
.5 m
illio
nW
ork
Rem
aini
ng( i
nc. R
isk)
:$2
25.6
mill
ion
Tota
l Ris
ks$9
9.2
mill
ion
(44%
of W
ork
Rem
aini
ng)
Cos
ts c
arrie
d in
Ris
k Fo
reca
st*:$
53.2
mill
ion
Futu
re R
isk:
$46.
0 m
illio
n (2
0% o
f Wor
k R
emai
ning
)
*“C
osts
” car
ried
in R
isk
Fore
cast
:$1
6.9
mill
ion:
200
5 D
eck
Join
t Rep
air o
n R
ichm
ond/
San
Raf
ael B
r.$8
.1 m
illio
n: V
ince
nt T
hom
as fu
ndin
g sh
ortfa
ll (2
005
AB
144)
$35.
0 m
illion
: SA
S C
lose
Out
Cos
t$8
.0 m
illio
n: B
asel
ine
CO
S c
osts
thru
Pro
gram
Com
plet
ion
($14
.8) m
illio
n: W
est A
ppro
ach
Land
Sal
es ($
7.8
mill
ion
retu
rned
to B
ATA
)$5
3.2
mill
ion:
Tot
al C
osts
bei
ng c
arrie
d in
Ris
k Fo
reca
st
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
“Cos
ts” C
arrie
d as
Ris
ks
Item
Cos
t(m
illio
ns)
Stat
us
R/S
RB
r Dec
k Jo
int R
epai
r$1
6.9
If TB
PO
C/B
ATA
appr
oved
rele
asin
g av
aila
ble
R/S
R C
ontin
genc
y, P
rogr
am “B
otto
m li
ne”
wou
ld im
prov
e by
$16
.9 m
illio
n.Vi
ncen
t Tho
mas
Fun
ding
$8.1
If fu
ndin
g de
ficit
back
fille
d P
rogr
am “B
otto
m
line”
wou
ld im
prov
e by
$8.
1 m
illio
nS
AS
Clo
se O
ut C
ost
$35.
0S
ubje
ct to
tim
elin
e of
Arb
itrat
ion
proc
ess
Bas
elin
e C
OS
thru
C
ompl
etio
n$8
.0Fi
scal
Yr 1
8/19
to T
BP
OC
in Q
2 20
18
Wes
t App
roac
hLa
nd S
ales
$14.
8If
fund
s tra
nsfe
rred
to B
ATA
not b
roug
ht b
ack
into
Pro
gram
, Pro
gram
“Bot
tom
line
” wou
ld
dete
riora
te b
y $1
0 m
illio
n.
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Rem
aini
ng W
ork
($22
5.6M
) Bas
ed o
n Q
4 20
17 F
orec
ast
$63.
5 m
illion
: Pot
entia
l SA
S C
lose
Out
$50.
2 m
illio
n: E
2 R
eten
tion,
E19
to E
22 D
emol
ition
Cap
ital C
ost
$11.
2 m
illio
n Fi
nal P
aym
ent &
Clo
se O
ut in
Mar
ine
Dem
o E
4 to
E18
$5
.3 m
illio
n: F
inal
Pay
men
t & C
lose
Out
to Y
BIT
S2
$4.6
mill
ion:
Fin
al P
aym
ent &
Clo
se O
ut to
504
’/288
” Dem
oliti
on$8
.9 m
illio
n: R
ight
of W
ay &
Env
ironm
enta
l Miti
gatio
n$5
.1 m
illio
n: W
est A
ppro
ach
Util
ity R
eloc
atio
n (T
o be
Ret
ired
Q1
18)
$16.
9 m
illio
n: R
ichm
ond/
San
Raf
ael P
rogr
am R
isk
$8.1
mill
ion:
Vin
cent
Tho
mas
Pro
gram
Ris
k($
10.0
) mill
ion:
Wes
t App
roac
h P
rogr
am O
ppor
tuni
ty$9
.4 m
illio
n: Y
BI P
rogr
am R
isks
$8.6
mill
ion:
Oth
er P
rogr
am R
isks
$2.2
mill
ion:
Mis
cella
neou
s C
O (i
.e. Y
BIT
S1
Util
ity W
ork)
$3
5.4
mill
ion:
Eas
t Spa
n C
OS
$5.8
mill
ion:
BA
TA S
outh
Gat
e R
d C
OS
$0.3
mill
ion:
Pro
gram
CO
S
$225
.6 m
illio
n: T
otal
Rem
aini
ng W
ork
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Cha
lleng
es G
oing
For
war
d
•B
udge
t Adj
ustm
ents
Fro
m P
roje
ct/P
rogr
am C
ontin
genc
y:1.
At l
east
one
yea
r of C
OS
18/
19: a
ctio
n ne
eded
Q2
2018
•A
war
d M
arin
e Fo
unda
tion
Ret
entio
n/R
emov
al c
ontra
ct b
y A
pril
1,
2018
.•
Tim
ely
Pro
cure
men
t of P
erm
its fo
r Pie
r Ret
entio
n.•
Det
erm
ine
Pro
cure
men
t Pro
cess
(CC
O to
CM
GC
, Sep
arat
e C
ontra
ct C
MG
C o
r DB
B) f
or re
sidu
al it
ems
on Y
BI a
nd O
TD M
ole
•P
roje
ct c
lose
-out
–S
AS
Arb
itrat
ion
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Q1
2018
For
ecas
t Cha
nge
As
Res
ult o
f Pie
r Ret
entio
n
Cha
nge
To Q
1 20
18 F
orec
ast a
s re
sult
of T
BP
OC
App
rove
d P
ier R
eten
tion
Opt
ion:
Q1
2018
For
ecas
t ($8
4.2M
) -Q
4 20
17 F
orec
ast (
$68.
0M) =
$16
.2M
incr
ease
Dat
eSc
ope
CO
CO
SR
isk
(50%
)Fo
reca
st
Q4
2017
Qua
rterly
E2
Ret
entio
n &
E19
to E
22 D
emo
$40.
0M$1
3.4M
$14.
6M$6
8.0M
Jan
23th
201
8TB
PO
CE
2, E
19, E
20 R
eten
tion
&
E19
, E20
Dem
o$5
2.0M
$13.
0M$1
9.7M
$84.
7M
Mar
26t
h20
18TB
PO
CE
2, E
19, E
20 R
eten
tion
&E
19 &
E20
Dem
o$4
7.3M
$13.
0M$2
3.9M
$84.
2M
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
Que
stio
ns?
Proj
ect R
isk
Man
agem
ent
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket
TBP
OC
Mar
ch 2
6, 2
018
Sup
plem
enta
l Pac
ket