“tea time!”: family rituals and their links to family functioning and youth wellbeing in new...
TRANSCRIPT
“Tea time!”: Family rituals and their links to family functioning
and youth wellbeing in New Zealand
Carla Crespo, Jan Pryor and Paul Jose
Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families
SASP-Wellington 2008
Family rituals: “windows” to the family
- Rituals tell researcher what families “do”
- Powerful organizer of behaviour within the family
- Interaction between individual and family - level factors
-Family rituals are associated with positive outcomes for young people such as stronger adolescent identity, and less alcohol consumption for adolescents in at-risk households; they have also been negatively linked with mental health problems.
Family rituals: Do they matter for young people?
What would you change in your family? “I would change the way we eat. We pretty much eat junk food every night…”
Boy (15 years old, Focus group)
Current study
Examined the links between family’s investment in rituals and:a) Family perceptions (young people and parents’/caregivers’ reports)b) Young people’s outcomes such as bullying behaviour and externalization as a coping strategy (young people’s reports)
Measures
-Family Ritual Questionnaire (Fiese and Kline, 1993)
-Family Cohesion (Adapted from FACES II, Olson, Portner & Bell, 1992)
-Family Monitoring and Supervision; Family Conflict (Adapted from Family Climate Inventory, Kurdek, Fine & Sinclair, 1995)
-Family Identity (Generated for the study)
Measures
-Work-life balance
(One item generated for the study)
-Coping strategy: Externalization(Adapted from Jose, D’Anna, Cafasso et al.)
-Bullying in and outside school (One item each measuring the frequency of bullying in the past month)
Dinner time“Think about a typical dinner in your
family”
For our familyreally true sort of true
A B
Some families regularly eat dinner together
For our family really true sort
of true
C D
Other families rarely eat dinner together.
BUT
Annual Celebrations“Think of celebrations that your family has every
year. Some examples would be birthdays, Christmas and anniversaries.”
For our familyreally true sort of true
A B
For some families , celebrations are important and special
For our family really true sort
of true
C D
For some families, celebrations aren’t
particularly important orspecial
BUT
Sample
930 Young People
Gender 50.9% Male 48.5% Female
Age Mean: 12.91 SD= 1.73
930 Parents/Caregivers
Relation to the child 84.3% Mothers 10.9% Fathers 4.8% Other
Families 64.5% Intact 17.9% Lone parent 9.6% Step families 2.9% Extended
Hypotheses
Stronger families’ investment in rituals will be linked to more positive perceptions of family by both young people and parents’ caregivers, namely:
higher levels of:Family CohesionFamily Monitoring and SupervisionFamily Identity
lower levels ofFamily conflict
and a more positive perception of Family work-life balance
Hypotheses
Stronger families’ investment in rituals will be associated with young people’s outcomes, namely:
lower levels of Bullying and Externalization
Correlations
Family rituals and other family dimensions
* p< .05 ----- Parents/caregivers** p <. 01 ----- Young people
Family Cohesio
n
Family Identity
Family Monitorin
g and supervisi
on
FamilyConflict
Work/life balance
FamilyRituals (Parents/caregiver
s’ reports)
.35**
.19**
.23**
.08*
.32**
.23 **
-.18**
-.14**
.19**
Correlations
Family rituals and young people’s outcomes
* p< .05** p <. 01 ----- Young people
Young people’s outcomes
Bullying(school)
Bullying outside school
Externalization
FamilyRituals (Parents/
Caregivers’ reports)
-.13 ** -.08 * -.12**
Cohesion
Monitoring/ Supervision
Identity
Conflict
Model fitChi-square: 1.52; p= .22; CFI= .99; RMSEA= .015
Work/life balance
Family Rituals
.28*
.14*
-.09*
.07*
SEM model predicting Family Rituals
Regression analyses: Predicting Bullying in school
Family rituals
Family Cohesion
Age
Gender
Bullying
(School)
-.10**-.16**.08*
.15**
* p < .05 ----- Parents/caregivers** p < . 01 ----- Young people
Regression analyses: Predicting Bullying outside school
Family rituals
Family Cohesion
Age
Gender
Bullying
(Outside School)
-.08*
-.03
-.02
.11**
* p< .05 ----- Parents/caregivers** p <. 01 ----- Young people
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
low med high
Family rituals
Bul
lyin
g ou
tsid
e sc
hool
Gender Boys Girls
Gender as a moderator in the link between Family rituals and Bullying outside school
Regression analyses: Predicting Externalization
Family rituals
Family Cohesion
Age
Gender
Externalization
-.08*
-.20**
-.02
-.05
* p < .05 ----- Parents/caregivers** p < . 01 ----- Young people
Discussion
- Stronger families’ investment in rituals is linked to more positive family perceptions reported by both parents/caregivers and young people
-Stronger families’ investment in rituals is negatively linked to young people’s bullying behaviour and externalization
Conclusions
The study of family rituals vs the study of more classic family dimensions
Family rituals: Relevant for young people’s regulation of interpersonal behaviour?
The assessment issue: The importance of young people’s independent perceptions of family rituals