teacher appendices · “tell me how you came up with this great idea.” ∗ smile! don’t let...

SECONDARY SCIENCE &

ENGINEERING FAIR

TEACHER APPENDICES

Science & Engineering Fair Preparation for Judging Site Fairs

Using the Rubric The rubrics are divided into major criteria. For each criterion, there are usually 2 to 5 “critical attributes”. For example:

CRITERION CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES Visual Quality of Display

1) appealing and neat 2) readable at appx. 2 feet 3) organized and clear 4) understandable visuals/models 5) few language/spelling errors

Each attribute is defined for the three levels of proficiency 1 (Partially Proficient) ≡ major, “show stopper” flaw or omission in one or more

of the critical attributes Rubric wording is “ … or … or … is missing …”

3 (Proficient) ≡ minor flaw or omission in one or more of the critical attributes Rubric wording is “ … and … and … are good.”

5 (Advanced Proficient) ≡ no flaws in the critical attributes which are thoroughly completed with excellence and creativity Rubric wording is “ … and … and … are excellent.”

When judging projects, assign only scores of 1, 3, or 5. Resist the temptation to give “4” or “3.5”. After judging each criterion, make sure to double the points for the indicated (x2) criteria. Add the points. The total will be between 10 and 50. All judges scores for the students will be averaged. In the event of a tie, all of the judges involved will decide the winner by discussion and vote.

Interviewing Students Some Things to Look for When Interviewing Students:

1) connection of the project to the student’s experiences and/or interests 2) that the project was a genuine learning opportunity for the student 3) how the research helped to form the hypothesis 4) how well the student connects their data to their conclusions

Some Things to Do to Help Students Do Their Best: ∗ Get at eye level to the student. (Chairs should be available.) ∗ Shake hands (and introduce yourself if they don’t know you well). ∗ Give a quick compliment to help break the ice. “Oh, what a great board!” ∗ Nervous students may try to start reading their project board. To prevent this, start with something like,

“Tell me how you came up with this great idea.” ∗ SMILE! Don’t let your nervousness stop you from smiling. Relaxed students will do a better job of

expressing their passion, interest, and understanding. Logistical Arrangements

0 Each teacher needs to list their projects by Name, Title, Grade Level (or Course), and Rubric Type. 0 With this information, your coordinator will be able to make sure each student receives the proper rubrics. 0 At the school site fair, make sure each project has a copy of the appropriate rubric and several appropriate scoring

sheets.

Problem (Double Points) (x2)

Preliminary Research Hypothesis

(Double Points) (x2) Procedure & Materials Results

(Double Points) (x2) Conclusions

Visual Quality of Display

for

School Science & Engineering Fair Judge’s Score/Comment Sheet

for


Name: Grade: Name: Grade:

Title: 6th – 8th Grade CCaarreeeerr SShhaaddooww Circle the appropriate score and copy the points on the right.

Title: 6th – 8th Grade CCaarreeeerr SShhaaddooww Circle the appropriate score and copy the points on the right.

Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:

Judged by: Judged by: NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.

NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4).

Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.

Partially Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient POINTS

Letter to Mentor 1 3 5 Research (x2) 2 6 10 Log (x2) 2 6 10 Interview (x2) 2 6 10 Reflection 1 3 5 Photo Journal 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display /

Scrapbook 1 3 5


Letter to Mentor 1 3 5 Research (x2) 2 6 10 Log (x2) 2 6 10 Interview (x2) 2 6 10 Reflection 1 3 5 Photo Journal 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display /

Scrapbook 1 3 5




Title: 6th – 8th Grade Experimental Project

Circle the appropriate score and copy the points on the right.


Circle the appropriate score and copy the points on the right. Partially

Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient POINTS

Partially Proficient Proficient

Advanced Proficient POINTS

Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:


NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.

Problem (x2) 2 6 10 Preliminary Research 1 3 5 Hypothesis (x2) 2 6 10 Procedure & Materials 1 3 5 Results (x2) 2 6 10 Conclusions 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5


for

for

for

School Science& Engineering Fair Judge’s Score/Comment Sheet

for



Title: 6th – 8th Grade Invention Circle the appropriate score and copy the points on the right.


Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:




Problem (x2) 2 6 10 Research 1 3 5 Possible Solutions 1 3 5 How Solution Works 1 3 5 Evaluation Chart 1 3 5 Obstacles 1 3 5 Revised Solutions 1 3 5 Science Concepts 1 3 5 Display Presentation 1 3 5



for


for



Title: 6th – 8th Grade Rube Goldberg Device


Title: 6th – 8th Grade Rube Goldberg Device


Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:




Task 1 3 5 Research 1 3 5 Preliminary Design 2 6 10 Obstacles (x2) 1 3 5 Final Design with Key (x2) 2 6 10 Reflection 1 3 5 Device Operation (x2) 2 6 10


Task 1 3 5 Research 1 3 5 Preliminary Design 2 6 10 Obstacles (x2) 1 3 5 Final Design with Key (x2) 2 6 10 Reflection 1 3 5 Device Operation (x2) 2 6 10

for


for



Title: 7th Grade Scientific Survey Projects


Title: 7th Grade Scientific Survey Projects


Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:




Problem (x2) 2 6 10 Preliminary Research 1 3 5 Hypothesis 1 3 5 Procedure (x2) 2 6 10 Results (x2) 2 6 10 Conclusions 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5


Problem (x2) 2 6 10 Preliminary Research 1 3 5 Hypothesis 1 3 5 Procedure (x2) 2 6 10 Results (x2) 2 6 10 Conclusions 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

School Science Fair Judge’s Score/Comment Sheet


for Teacher: Teacher:

for Name: Period:



Name: Period:



Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:







for


for





Score: / 50

Comments:

Score: / 50

Comments:


NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.





School Science Fair

Judge’s Score/Comment Sheet

for Name: Grade: Title: 5th-8th Grade Reverse Engineering



Purpose 1 3 5 Product Research 1 3 5 Device Details 1 3 5 Part/Subassembly Description 2 6 10 Materials and Connections 1 3 5 Professionals in Design 2 6 10 Reflection & Principals 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

Score: ____ / 50Comments: Judged by: NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.


for Name: Grade: Title: 5th-8th Grade Reverse Engineering



Purpose 1 3 5 Product Research 1 3 5 Device Details 1 3 5 Part/Subassembly Description 2 6 10 Materials and Connections 1 3 5 Professionals in Design 2 6 10 Reflection & Principals 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

Score: ____ / 50Comments: Judged by: NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.


for Name: Grade: Title: 6th-8th Grade Enviromental Innovation



Problem (x2) 1 3 5 Preliminary Research 2 6 10 Innovative Idea 2 6 10 Action Plan with Timeline 2 6 10 Cost/Benefit Anaysis 1 3 5 Reflection 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

Score: ____ / 50

Comments: Judged by: NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.


for Name: Grade: Title: 6th-8th Grade Environmental Innovation



Problem (x2) 1 3 5 Preliminary Research 2 6 10 Innovative Idea 2 6 10 Action Plan with Timeline 2 6 10 Cost/Benefit Anaysis 1 3 5 Reflection 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

Score: ____ / 50

Comments: Judged by: NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4).

Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report detaildetails, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.


for Name: Period:

Title: 9th – 12th Grade Environmental Innovation



Environmental Problem 1 3 5 Preliminary Research 2 6 10 Innovative Idea 2 6 10 Action Plan with timeline 2 6 10 Cost/Benefit Analysis 1 3 5 Reflection 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

Score: ____ / 50



for Name: Period:

Title: 9th – 12th Grade Environmental Innovation



Environmental Problem 1 3 5 Preliminary Research 2 6 10 Innovative Idea 2 6 10 Action Plan with timeline 2 6 10 Cost/Benefit Analysis 1 3 5 Reflection 1 3 5 Visual Quality of Display 1 3 5

Score: ____ / 50


Teacher: Teacher:

Science Fair RUBRICS GUIDE

Grade

TYPES OF PROJECTS ALLOWABLE FOR GRADE LEVELS

Collection

Experiment

Environmental Innovation

Research

Invention Reverse

Engineering

Career Shadow

Rube Goldberg Device

Scientific Survey

K Yes Yes Yes Yes

1st Yes Yes Yes Yes

2nd Yes Yes Yes

3rd Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

4th Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

5th Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

6th Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

7th Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

8th Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

9th Yes Yes Yes Yes

10th Yes Yes Yes Yes



Updated October 2017

Science Fair CCaarreeeerr SShhaaddooww (6th - 8th Grade)

Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 11

Proficient 33

Advanced Proficient 55

Letter to Mentor

Introduction letter thanks the mentor for allowing student to shadow them, but does not provide details about relevant skills or interest that the student brings to the shadow. Or, provides little or no information about the purpose of the shadow.

Introduction letter thanks the mentor and introduces the student to mentor mentioning some relevant skills or interests that the student brings to the shadow. Provides some information about the purpose of the shadow.

Introduction letter thanks the mentor and introduces the student to mentor clearly explaining relevant skills and interests that the student brings to the shadow. Provides a clear presentation of the purpose of the shadow.

Research (double points) xx22

Cites only one or two sources of information about the occupation observed, or uses only one type of information resource. Makes little or no connection to the reason for selecting the planned shadow.

Cites three or more sources of information about the occupation observed, using at least two types of information resources. Makes a general connection to the reason for selecting the planned shadow in the student’s own words.

Cites four or more sources of information about the occupation observed, using at least three types of information resources. Makes clear and well-elaborated connections to the reason for selecting the planned shadow in the student’s own words.

Log (double points) xx22

Notes from the job shadow are incomplete or lack detail, or do not reflect completion of the required eight hours or lack mentor’s signature to validate the hours.

Notes chronicling each hour of the job shadow provide adequate detail to describe the experience. The log records eight to ten hours of shadowing, verified by the mentor’s signature.

Detailed notes chronicling each hour of the job shadow give details that clearly describe the experience. The log records more than ten hours of shadowing, verified by the mentor’s signature.

Interview (double points) xx22

Student transcribes responses to questions, or records only a few responses. Or, there are less than three student-developed questions. Or, the summary of responses fails to give a clear picture of the occupation and the mentor’s experience in it.

Student summarizes responses to several questions, including at least three student- developed questions, that give a general picture of the occupation and the mentor’s experience in it.

Student summarizes responses to at least 10 questions, four of which are student- developed, to give a clear picture of many aspects of the occupation and the mentor’s experience in it.

Reflection Reflection on the experience merely retells events of the job shadow and makes vague or no reference to the student’s life.

Reflection on the experience relates the shadow in a general way to the student’s own life.

Reflection on the experience relates the shadow and the mentor’s occupation to the student’s temperament, talents, and future aspirations.

Photo Journal Few photos record parts of the job shadow. Several photos of the job shadow, including

one of the mentor with the student, reflect significant aspects of the experience.

Thorough photographic record of the job shadow, including one of the mentor with the student, provides an organized visual overview of the experience.

Visual Quality of Scrapbook / Display Board

Various parts of the assignment are collected into a scrapbook or onto a display board, but little organization or effort to convey a complete story of job shadow experience is evident.

All parts of the assignment are assembled into a scrapbook or onto a display board showing some organization to convey the job shadow experience.

All parts of the assignment are neatly organized into a scrapbook or onto a display board that creatively draws the reader into the student’s job shadow experience.

(Projects will receive between 10 and 50 points when all rubric criteria have been addressed.)

Scie

nce

Fair

CC aarr ee

ee rr SS hh

aa ddoo ww

(6

th –

8th G

rade

) Ju

dge’

s Sc

ore

Shee

t for

Sc

hool

Site

Sci

ence

Fai

rs

Letter to Mentor

Research (double points) x2

Log (double points) x2

Interview (double points) x2

Reflection

Photo Journal

Visual Quality of Scrapbook / Displayboard

Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

St

uden

t(s):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:

NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written evidence of drafts, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.

Suggested Questions for CCaarreeeerr SShhaaddooww IInntteerrvviieeww:

1. How long have you been doing this job?

2. What originally attracted you to this job?

3. What type(s) of schooling or other training did you have to do to be qualified for this job?

4. How do you stay on top of the most current research in this job?

5. Are there particular skills that are needed or come in handy in this occupation?

6. What do you find to be the most rewarding part of this job?

7. In this occupation, what types of situations or circumstances create stress?

8. What types of things have come as a surprise to you in this job?

9. How do subjects taught in middle and high school prepare me for a future in this field?

10. Is the way you practice this profession the only way this job is done? What other ways can it be done? What are the benefits of each?

11. What are the controversial issues involved in this profession? What are the different sides of each issue?

Science Fair ExperimentalProjects (6th – 8th Grade) Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 1

Proficient 3


Problem

(Double Points) (x2)

States the problem as a question that is vague, or as a statement, or addresses an issue to which the student already knows the answer. Shows limited or no connection to a valid scientific or mathematical concept.

States problem as a question, and represents a genuine learning opportunity for the student. Generally addresses a valid scientific or mathematical concept.

States problem as a question, provides evidence that it comes from the student’s personal interests or experiences, and represents a genuine learning opportunity for the student. Specifically addresses a valid scientific or mathematical concept, or has a beneficial application to some aspect of society.

Preliminary Research

Uses limited sources from only one type of information resource (e.g., text, encyclopedia, businesses, magazines, catalogs, internet, or interviews), or uses some resources that are not reputable sources. Fails to connect the research to the problem, or material is copied rather than written in the student’s own words.

Uses three or more reputable sources, cited correctly. Cites more than one type of information resource. Makes a general connection between the research and the problem in the student’s own words.

Uses five or more reputable sources, cited correctly. Cites at least four types of information resources. Makes a clear connection between each source and the problem in the student’s own words.

Hypothesis

(Double Points) (x2) Hypothesis is either not testable or does not connect to the stated problem, or shows no connection to the preliminary research.

Hypothesis is complete (in one sentence), testable, addresses the stated problem, and shows some connection to the preliminary research.

Hypothesis is complete (in one sentence), testable, and clearly addresses the stated problem. Shows a direct connection to their preliminary research.

Procedure & Materials

Experiment is not relevant to the hypothesis or is only performed once. The procedures outlined are seriously incomplete or not sequential, or materials list is missing or incomplete.

Experiment is adequate to test the hypothesis, but may leave some unanswered questions. Performs experiment one or more times. Procedures are outlined in a step-by-step fashion, but there may be 1 or 2 gaps that require explanation. Major materials are listed.

Experiment is a well-constructed test of the hypothesis and is performed several times. Procedures are outlined in a step-by-step fashion that could be followed by anyone without additional explanations. All relevant materials are listed.

Results


Does not summarize data clearly. The relationship between the variables is unclear or not discussed. Makes no predictions about what might happen if part of the experiment were changed to better test the hypothesis or answer a further question.

Summarizes the data in a way that clearly describes what was discovered using graphs or charts. Mentions at least one relationship between the variables and gives some analysis of trends/patterns. May attempt predictions about what might happen to the results if part of the experiment were changed to better test the hypothesis or answer a further question.

Summarizes the data in a way that clearly describes what was discovered using graphs or charts. Discusses relationships between the variables and thoroughly analyzes trends/patterns. Makes well-reasoned predictions about what might happen if part of the experiment were changed to better test the hypothesis or answer a further question.

Conclusions Conclusion does not answer the problem, or does not refer back to the hypothesis, or contradicts the evidence collected.

Conclusion addresses the problem, states if the hypothesis was supported or rejected, and gives some explanation why.

Conclusion completely answers all aspects of the problem, states if the hypothesis was supported or rejected, and clearly cites evidence to explain why.


Project has limited eye appeal or is not easily readable at approximately two feet distance. The project has limited organization, or contains confusing visuals, or contains major language or spelling errors.

Project is appealing and readable at approximately 2 feet distance. It is organized and clear, uses understandable visuals and/or models, and contains few language and spelling errors.

Project is appealing and neat, and is readable at approximately 2 feet distance. It is well organized and clear, makes striking use of inventive or amusing visuals and/or models, and uses language and spelling flawlessly.


Scie

nce

Fair

Exper

imenta

l Proj

ects

(6th

– 8th

Gra

de)

Judg

e’s

Scor

e Sh

eet f

or

Scho

ol S

ite S

cien

ce F

airs

Problem



Hypothesis



Results


Conclusions


Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:


Science Fair Inventions: Engineering Innovations (6th-8th Grade) Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 1

Proficient 3



Addresses a practical need to which there is already a common solution, or addresses an issue of little practical value.

Addresses a somewhat practical need some people have, which may have an expensive or uncommon solution.

Creatively addresses a practical need some people have, which may have an expensive or uncommon solution.

Research

Cites one or no information resource (e.g., text, encyclopedia, businesses, magazines, catalogs, internet, or interviews). Fails to mention a known similar idea in common use, or material is copied rather than written in the student’s own words.

Cites few information resources. Mentions known similar ideas with some elaboration. Makes a general connection to a similar idea in the student’s own words.

Cites at least four types of resources Makes a clear and well-elaborated connection with a known similar idea in the student’s own words.

Possible Solutions

Proposes three or fewer solutions, some of which may be fanciful. Solution description is limited.

Proposes at least three practical solutions with limited description.

Proposes three or more practical solutions. One or more are very creative. Provides sufficient description for reader to understand.

How Invention Works

Provides few details, leaving the reader unclear about how the invention works.

Provides adequate details, giving the reader a general understanding of how the invention works.

Explains the invention, addressing all details, giving the reader a clear understanding of how the invention works.

Chart for Evaluating Invention

Student-developed criteria may be generic and do not apply specifically to the problem. Or, criteria may not be student-developed.

Criteria are student-developed. Some criteria apply to how the invention addresses the problem.

Criteria are student-developed specifically for the project and apply directly to how the invention addresses the problem.

Obstacles

Fails to analyze obstacles related to the practical design and function of the invention (i.e., may list obstacles that refer only to shopping for materials or cosmetic issues).

Provides adequate analysis of the obstacles related to the practical design and function of the invention (i.e., may discuss durability, strength, ease of use, cost/benefit for potential customers, etc.).

Demonstrates in-depth analysis of the obstacles related to the practical design and function of the invention.

Revised Solutions

Revised solutions do not address the obstacles mentioned, or are not practical.

Revised solutions practically address the obstacles mentioned.

Revised solutions practically address the obstacles mentioned and consider durability or other future issues.

Science Concepts

Provides limited or no explanation of science concepts. Explanation may not apply to the project.

Provides an adequate explanation of at least one science concept, which has some application to the project.

Provides in-depth explanation of at least one science concept directly applying to the project.

Display Presentation





Scie

nce

Fair

Inve

ntio

ns

(6th

– 8th

Gra

de)

Judg

e’s

Scor

e Sh

eet f

or

Scho

ol S

ite S

cien

ce F

airs


Research

Possible Solutions

How Solution Works

Evaluation Chart

Obstacles

Revised Solutions

Science Concepts


Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:


Science Fair Rube Goldberg Device (6th - 8th Grade)

Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 1

Proficient 3


Task The device performs a simple task that has no practical value.

The device performs a simple task some people would find practical.

The device performs a task that is moderately complicated, or that many people would find practical.

Research

Cites two or fewer sources of information about energy, or uses the wrong format, or uses only one type of information resource. Makes little or no connection to the actual energy transformations of the device.

Cites three or more sources of information about energy in the correct format, using at least two types of information resources. Makes a general connection to the types of energy transformations of the device in the student’s own words.

Cites four or more sources of information about energy, in the correct format, using at least three types of information resources. Makes clear and well-elaborated connections to each energy transformations of the device in the student’s own words.

Preliminary Design

Diagram and notes show limited progress toward making a working device, or have fewer than eight energy transfers, or use only two or three types of energy.

Diagram and notes show a proposed device with at least eight energy transfers using four types of energy.

Diagram and notes show a proposed device with at least ten energy transfers using five or more types of energy.

Obstacles (double points) x2

Fails to analyze obstacles related to the practical design, construction, and stable function of the invention (i.e., may list obstacles that refer only to shopping for materials or cosmetic issues).

Provides adequate analysis of the obstacles related to the practical design, construction, and stable function of the device.

Demonstrates in-depth analysis of the obstacles related to the practical design, construction, and stable function of the device.

Final Design with Key (double points)

x2 Drawing is not rendered in ink, or is unclear or incomplete in showing the operating pieces and structural supports. Or, the labels and explanations for the energy transfers are significantly flawed.

Drawing is made in ink. It reasonably represents the operating pieces and the necessary structural supports. Energy transfers are labeled and explained with minor omissions or mistakes.

Drawing is made in ink. It clearly shows each operating piece and the necessary structural supports. All energy transfers are well labeled and explained.

Reflection Student fails to describe both challenges and rewards of the project, or omits or makes unclear applications to personal strengths and possible career goals.

Student describes some challenges and rewards of the project, making applications to personal strengths and possible career goals.

Student clearly describes challenges and rewards of the project, making numerous applications to personal strengths and possible career goals.

Device Operation (double points)

x2 Live device (or video recording) does not demonstrate complete operation without a break and without assistance after starting the device. Student narrates, from start to finish, the transfers of energy from object to object, but has significant omissions or inaccuracies.

Live device (or video recording) shows complete operation without a break and without assistance after starting the device. Student narrates, from start to finish, the transfers of energy from object to object with minor omissions or inaccuracies.

Live device (or video recording) proves complete and reproducible operation without a break and without assistance after starting the device. Student narrates, from start to finish, the transfers of energy from object to object without omissions or inaccuracies.


Scie

nce

Fair

Rube

Gol

dber

g De

vice

(6

th –

8th G

rade

) Ju

dge’

s Sc

ore

Shee

t for

Sc

hool

Site

Sci

ence

Fai

rs

Task

Research

Preliminary Design

Obstacles (double points) x2

Final Design (with key) x2 (double points)

Reflection

Device Operation x2 (double points)

Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

St

uden

t(s):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:

NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written evidence of drafts, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.

Energy Forms to Use in Rube Goldberg Device Projects:

Potential Energy (Stored) Forms D Gravitational ...... in height D Chemical ............ in the bonds of fuels/foods D Elastic................. in stretched or compressed objects D Electrostatic........ in charged objects D Magnetic ............ in magnetized objects D Nuclear............... in the nucleus of atoms

Active Energy Forms

D Mechanical (Kinetic) ...... moving objects D Electrical ......................... moving charges D Thermal ........................... moving atoms/molecules D Electromagnetic .............. moving photons

Science Fair Scientific Survey Projects (7th Grade) Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 1

Proficient 3


Problem


States the problem as a question that is vague, or as a statement, or addresses an issue to which the student already knows the answer. Shows limited or no connection to a valid scientific or mathematical concept




Uses limited sources from only one type of information resource (e.g., text, encyclopedia, businesses, magazines, catalogs, internet, or interviews), or uses some resources that are not reputable sources. Fails to mention what is already known about the problem, or material is copied rather than written in the student’s own words.


Uses five or more reputable sources, cited correctly. Student cites at least four types of sources. Makes a clear connection between each source and the problem in their own words.

Hypothesis Hypothesis is either not testable or does not connect to the stated problem, or shows no connection to the research.

Hypothesis is complete (in one sentence), testable, addresses the stated problem, and shows some connection to the research.

Hypothesis is complete (in one sentence) and is testable, and clearly addresses the stated problem. Student clearly shows a direct connection to their research.

Procedure


Survey questions are not relevant to the hypothesis, or ambiguous, or are biased (leading) questions. Or, the survey only samples a small number of people and makes no attempt to randomize the respondents. There is no intention to determine anything beyond the direct answers to the questions.

Survey questions are relevant to the hypothesis and unbiased. The procedure shows efforts to sample the largest number of people possible and seeks to randomize the respondents. There is no intention to determine anything beyond the direct answers to the questions.

Survey questions are relevant to the hypothesis and unbiased. The student clearly surveys the largest number of people possible and seeks to randomize the respondents. The survey is designed to determine something more than just answers to the individual questions.

Results


Fails to clearly summarize data from the survey or is displays it in only one way. Or, relationships, trends, and patterns are either not related to the problem or not evident at all. Does not make note of flaws or unexpected results, and does not make predictions about what might happen if part of the survey or the conditions of the survey were changed.

Summarizes data from the survey and visually displays it using at least two types of graphs and charts. Highlights trends or patterns relevant to the problem. May note flaws or unexpected results, but does not make reasonable predictions about what might happen if part of the survey or the conditions of the survey were changed.

Summarizes data from the survey and visually displays it using at least two well-chosen types of graphs and charts. Highlights trends or patterns relevant to the problem. Notes flaws or unexpected results (if any) and makes reasonable predictions about what might happen if part of the survey or the conditions of the survey were changed.


Conclusion answers the problem and states if the hypothesis was supported or rejected.

Conclusion completely answers all aspects of the problem. It also states if the hypothesis was supported or rejected, and explains why.






Scie

nce

Fair

Scie

ntifi

c Sur

vey

Proj

ects

(7th

Gra

de)

Judg

e’s

Scor

e Sh

eet f

or

Scho

ol S

ite S

cien

ce F

airs

Problem



Hypothesis

Procedure


Results


Conclusions


Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:

NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient, 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient, 25-39 pts = Proficient, 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient. Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, display guidelines, model quality, etc.

Science Fair Engineering Projects (9th-12th Grade) Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 1

Proficient 3



Addresses a practical need to which there is already a common solution, or addresses an issue of little practical value.

Addresses a somewhat practical need some people have, which may have an expensive or uncommon solution.

Creatively addresses a practical need some people have, which may have an expensive or uncommon solution.

Research

Cites one or no information resource (e.g., text, encyclopedia, businesses, magazines, catalogs, internet, or interviews). Fails to mention a known similar idea in common use, or material is copied rather than written in the student’s own words.

Cites few information resources. Mentions known similar ideas with some elaboration. Makes a general connection to a similar idea in the student’s own words.

Cites at least four types of resources Makes a clear and well-elaborated connection with a known similar idea in the student’s own words.

Possible Solutions

Proposes three or fewer solutions, some of which may be fanciful. Solution description is limited.

Proposes at least three practical solutions with limited description.

Proposes three or more practical solutions. One or more are very creative. Provides sufficient description for reader to understand.

How Invention Works

Provides few details, leaving the reader unclear about how the invention works.

Provides adequate details, giving the reader a general understanding of how the invention works.

Explains the invention, addressing all details, giving the reader a clear understanding of how the invention works.

Chart for Evaluating Invention

Student-developed criteria may be generic and do not apply specifically to the problem. Or, criteria may not be student-developed.

Criteria are student-developed. Some criteria apply to how the invention addresses the problem.

Criteria are student-developed specifically for the project and apply directly to how the invention addresses the problem.

Obstacles

Fails to analyze obstacles related to the practical design and function of the invention (i.e., may list obstacles that refer only to shopping for materials or cosmetic issues).

Provides adequate analysis of the obstacles related to the practical design and function of the invention (i.e., may discuss durability, strength, ease of use, cost/benefit for potential customers, etc.).

Demonstrates in-depth analysis of the obstacles related to the practical design and function of the invention.

Revised Solutions

Revised solutions do not address the obstacles mentioned, or are not practical.

Revised solutions practically address the obstacles mentioned.

Revised solutions practically address the obstacles mentioned and consider durability or other future issues.

Science Concepts

Provides limited or no explanation of science concepts. Explanation may not apply to the project.

Provides an adequate explanation of at least one science concept, which has some application to the project.

Provides in-depth explanation of at least one science concept directly applying to the project.






Scie

nce

Fair

Engi

neer

ing

Proj

ects

(9

th –

12th

Gra

de)

Judg

e’s

Scor

e Sh

eet f

or

Scho

ol S

ite S

cien

ce F

airs


Research

Possible Solutions

How Solution Works

Evaluation Chart

Obstacles

Revised Solutions

Science Concepts


Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:


Science Fair Experimental Projects (9th – 12th Grade) Rubric for School Site Science Fair

Attempted 1

Proficient 3


Problem


States the problem as a question that is vague, or as a statement, or addresses an issue to which the student already knows the answer. Shows limited or no connection to a valid scientific or mathematical concept.




Uses limited sources from only one type of information resource (e.g., text, encyclopedia, businesses, magazines, catalogs, internet, or interviews), or uses some resources that are not reputable sources. Fails to connect the research to the problem, or material is copied rather than written in the student’s own words.


Uses five or more reputable sources, cited correctly. Cites at least four types of information resources. Makes a clear connection between each source and the problem in the student’s own words.

Hypothesis

(Double Points) (x2) Hypothesis is either not testable or does not connect to the stated problem, or shows no connection to the preliminary research.

Hypothesis is complete (in one sentence), testable, addresses the stated problem, and shows some connection to the preliminary research.

Hypothesis is complete (in one sentence), testable, and clearly addresses the stated problem. Shows a direct connection to their preliminary research.


Experiment is not relevant to the hypothesis or is only performed once. The procedures outlined are seriously incomplete or not sequential, or materials list is missing or incomplete.

Experiment is adequate to test the hypothesis, but may leave some unanswered questions. Performs experiment one or more times. Procedures are outlined in a step-by-step fashion, but there may be 1 or 2 gaps that require explanation. Major materials are listed.

Experiment is a well-constructed test of the hypothesis and is performed several times. Procedures are outlined in a step-by-step fashion that could be followed by anyone without additional explanations. All relevant materials are listed.

Results


Does not summarize data clearly. The relationship between the variables is unclear or not discussed. Makes no predictions about what might happen if part of the experiment were changed to better test the hypothesis or answer a further question.

Summarizes the data in a way that clearly describes what was discovered using graphs or charts. Mentions at least one relationship between the variables and gives some analysis of trends/patterns. May attempt predictions about what might happen to the results if part of the experiment were changed to better test the hypothesis or answer a further question.

Summarizes the data in a way that clearly describes what was discovered using graphs or charts. Discusses relationships between the variables and thoroughly analyzes trends/patterns. Makes well-reasoned predictions about what might happen if part of the experiment were changed to better test the hypothesis or answer a further question.


Conclusion addresses the problem, states if the hypothesis was supported or rejected, and gives some explanation why.

Conclusion completely answers all aspects of the problem, states if the hypothesis was supported or rejected, and clearly cites evidence to explain why.






Problem



Hypothesis



Results


Conclusions


Total Score

Perio

d:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Stud

ent(s

):

Proj

ect:

Teac

her:

Science & Engineering Fair Environmental Innovation (6th-12th ) Rubric for School Site Fair

Attempted 1 point

Proficient 3 points

Advanced Proficient 5 points

Environmental Problem

States the environmental problem as a question that is vague, or as a statement, or addresses an issue to which the student already knows the answer. Shows limited or no connection to societal benefit.

States environmental issue or problem as a question, which represents a genuine learning opportunity for the student. Generally addresses benefit to some aspect of society.

States the environmental issue or problem as a question, provides evidence that it comes from the student’s personal interests or experiences and represents a genuine learning opportunity for the student. The project has a specific beneficial application to some aspect of society.



Cites fewer than three sources. Or, the description of the research is incomplete, or has little connection to their identified problem, or is not written in the student’s own words. Or, fails to mention other attempts to address this problem.

Cites three or more sources from one or more types of resources (e.g., text, encyclopedia, businesses, magazines, catalogs, internet, or interviews). The student generally connects the research to their identified problem in their own words. Mentions some other solutions attempted by others.

Uses five or more reputable sources, cited correctly. Cites at least four types of information resources. Compares their idea to existing methodologies and solutions attempted.

Innovative Idea


Attempts to explain the innovative idea. Visuals and notes may be incomplete or fail to show a new or original approach. It may be unclear how the idea could possibly minimize impact or counter the threat of the environmental problem.

Explains the innovative idea. Visuals and notes show that the idea attempts to solve the problem with a new or original approach. The student mentions a possible way their idea might minimize impact or counter the threat of the environmental problem.

Clearly explains the innovative idea in detail. Visuals and notes show that the idea attempts to solve the problem with a new or original approach. The student identifies specific ways their idea will minimize impact or counter the threat of the environmental problem.

Action Plan with Timeline


Timeline of the action plan may be incomplete or neglects to reference supports for success, such as resources, materials, people, etc. Action step labels or explanations are vague or missing.

Timeline shows the order of the action plan and refers to supports for success, such as resources, materials, people, etc. All action steps are labeled and explained.

Timeline clearly shows each step of the action plan and thoroughly addresses necessary supports for success such as resources, materials, partnerships, etc. All action steps are labeled and explained.

Cost/Benefit Analysis

Student provides little description of difficulties in making their innovation practical, efficient, or sustainable. Or, fails to mention realistic ways that people needed to carry out the action plan would be impacted.

Student describes difficulties they can see in making their innovation practical, efficient, or sustainable. Mentions some ways that people needed to carry out the action plan would be impacted.

Student thoroughly analyzes the monetary and nonmonetary costs/benefits and impacted parties associated with the implementation of the action plan.

Reflection

Student is unclear about challenges and rewards of the project. Or, makes vague applications to personal strengths or neglects possible use of the idea in other settings. Or, neglects or argues with little evidence about why the problem should be addressed.

Student lists challenges and rewards of the project, making applications to personal strengths and possible use of the idea in other settings. Uses some evidence to explain why the problem should be addressed.

Student clearly describes challenges and rewards of the project, making numerous applications to personal strengths and possible use of the idea in other settings. Takes a clear stand that argues for the practicality of the innovation based on their analysis evidence.






Environmental Problem



Innovative Idea


Action Plan with Timeline


Cost/Benefit Analysis

Reflection


Total Score

Envir

onme

ntal I

nnov

ation

(6

th –

8th

Gra

de)

Judg

e’s

Scor

e Sh

eet f

or

Scho

ol S

ite F

airs Pe

riod:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Stu

dent

(s):

Pro

ject

:

Teac

her:

NOTES TO TEACHER: For grading purposes, 5-10 pts = Not Proficient (1), 11-24 pts = Partially Proficient (2), 25-39 pts = Proficient (3), 40-50 pts = Advanced Proficient (4). Complete grading should also include other details not included here as Judging Criteria: for instance, written report details, completion of deadline tasks, dispmodel quality, etc.

Reverse Engineering (5th-8th Grade) Rubric for School Site Fair

Attempted

1 Proficient

3 Advanced Proficient

5 Purpose & Acknowledgements

Is unclear about their purpose for reverse engineering this device. Acknowledgements do not address the relevant skills of those who helped.

Describes the general purpose for reverse engineering this device. Acknowledges and thanks people that contributed to understanding the device and addresses some relevant skills and interests of each contributor.

Provides a clear presentation of the student’s purpose for reverse engineering this device. Acknowledges and thanks each person that contributed to understanding the device and clearly explains relevant skills and interests of each contributor.

Product Research

Presents findings from fewer than three sources or cites sources that may not be reliable. Or, provides little information about the origin and development of the device over time.

Presents findings from three or more reputable sources and provides some information about the origin and development of the device over time.

Presents detailed findings from four or more reputable sources and clearly explains the origin and development of the device over time.

Device Details Identifying information about the device may be incomplete, or description of the basic operation and purpose of the device is vague or incomplete.

Provides identifying information about the device and describes the basic operation and purpose of the device.

Provides thorough identifying information about the device. Clearly describes the operation and purpose of the device, including all multiple functions.

Part / Subassembly Description & Explanation (Double Points) (x2)

Labels and details are too limited to give the reader an understanding of each part of the device. Explains of the function or operation of a few parts or neglects to mention how they relate to the device as a whole. Does not consider what would happen if certain parts were altered or missing or explanation is not clear.

Provides labels and enough details to give the reader an adequate understanding of each part of the device. Explains of the function or operation of most parts and how they relate to the device as a whole. Considers what would happen if certain parts were altered or missing.

Provides all labels and details needed to give the reader a clear understanding of each part of the device. Gives a clear explanation of the function or operation of each part and how it relates to the device as a whole. Carefully considers what would happen if each part was altered or missing.

Materials and Connections

Recorded observations describing the types of materials are used in each part are incomplete or unclear. Attempts to explain how each part fits into the device, but labeled diagrams/photographs and explanations are unclear about how each part is connected to the device. Or, neglects to explain why certain materials were used in each part.

Writes observations describing the types of materials are used in each part. Briefly explains how each part fits into the device. Provides labeled diagrams/photographs and adequate explanations to demonstrate how each part is connected to the device. Explains why certain materials were used in each part.

Writes clear, scientific observations describing what types of materials are used in each part. Demonstrates in-depth analysis of how each part fits into the device. Provides clearly labeled diagrams/photographs and precise explanations demonstrating how each part is connected to the device. Explains why certain materials were used in each part.

Professionals Involved in Design & Manufacture (Double Points) (x2)

Identifies some professions, but the connection to the design and manufacture the device is unclear.

Identifies some professions required to design and manufacture the device. Explains some specific ways that people (such as chemical engineers, mechanical engineers, artists, electrical engineers, software engineers, bioengineers, etc.) have contributed to the device.

Identifies the various professions required to design and manufacture the device. Explains several specific ways that people (such as chemical engineers, mechanical engineers, artists, electrical engineers, software engineers, bioengineers, etc.) have contributed to the device.

Reflection & Principles

Explanation of new things learned about the device through the reverse engineering process is vague or missing. Connections of the device design to scientific and engineering principles are unclear or missing.

Explains new things learned about the device through the reverse engineering process. Makes general connections of the device design to one or few scientific and engineering principles.

Explains new things learned about the device through the reverse engineering process. Connects the device design to various and specific scientific and engineering principles.





Projects will receive between 10 and 50 points when all rubric criteria have been addressed. Class grade should also include how well timelines were met and elements of the written report not found on the display board:

Title Page, Acknowledgements, Table of Contents, and Sources/Bibliography

Reverse Engineering (5th-8th Grade) Targets for an Excellent Project

Advanced Proficient

5 “TRANSLATED”

Purpose & Acknowledgements

Provides a clear presentation of the student’s purpose for reverse engineering this device. Acknowledges and thanks each person that contributed to understanding the device and clearly explains relevant skills and interests of each contributor.

Explain why you are interested in how this device works. Give reasons for why you asked certain people to help you.

Product Research

Presents detailed findings from four or more reputable sources and clearly explains the origin and development of the device over time.

Research thoroughly how this device was invented and how it has developed. Connect this to your purpose.

Device Details Provides thorough identifying information about the device. Clearly describes the operation and purpose of the device, including all multiple functions.

Describe the device and all the ways it works. Part / Subassembly Description & Explanation (Double Points) (x2)

Provides all labels and details needed to give the reader a clear understanding of each part of the device. Gives a clear explanation of the function or operation of each part and how it relates to the device as a whole. Carefully considers what would happen if each part was altered or missing.

Organize and label all parts of your device for display. Explain each part's name/description. Describe how each part works or is used in the device.

Materials and Connections

Writes clear, scientific observations describing what types of materials are used in each part. Demonstrates in-depth analysis of how each part fits into the device. Provides clearly labeled diagrams/photographs and precise explanations demonstrating how each part is connected to the device. Explains why certain materials were used in each part.

Observe what each part is made of and explain why the material makes sense. Describe how each part is attached to the device. Use pictures, diagrams, and words to make it really clear.

Professionals Involved in Design & Manufacture


Identifies the various professions required to design and manufacture the device. Explains several specific ways that people (such as chemical engineers, mechanical engineers, artists, electrical engineers, software engineers, bioengineers, etc.) have contributed to the device.

Identify the various engineers, scientists, and artists needed to design and produce the device. Explain why each one was needed.

Reflection & Principles

Explains new things learned about the device through the reverse engineering process. Connects the device design to various and specific scientific and engineering principles.

Explain new learning. Point out science and engineering concepts the design takes advantage of.



Make your project fun to look at with pictures and colors. Use large, clear lettering. Check grammar and spelling.

SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR

SCIENCE TOPICS FOR GRADES 6-12

Try to choose a science project that lines up with a science topic covered during your current school year. Or, you might choose to do a science project from next year’s topics. Use the list of topics below to help you think of project ideas if you are not sure how to start.

Earth Sciences Life Sciences Physical Sciences

6th • Earth’s Layers • Plate Tectonics • Mountain Building • Earthquakes, Faults, and Epicenters • California Geology • Mechanical & Chemical Weathering • Minerals • Rock Cycle (Igneous, Metamorphic, and Se • Sun’s Effect on Weather • Convections • Solar Energy • Atmospheric Conditions • Natural Resources • Stratigraphy: Fossil Locations Rock • Geologic Timeline of Earth’s History • Formation of Fossils • Methods of Dating Earth’s History

• Food Chains / Food Webs • Ecosystems • Human Impacts on Ecosystems

• Density (Qualitative) • Energy • Temperature vs. Heat • Heat Transfer

7th • Cell Similarities & Differentiation • Function of Cell Structures • Energy at the Cellular Level • Photosynthesis / Respiration • Mitosis • Genetics • DNA – RNA – Protein • Sexual / Asexual Reproduction • Meiosis • DNA, Genes, & Alleles • Dominant & Recessive Traits • Theory of Evolution • Natural Selection • Body Systems • Taxonomic Keys • Kingdoms & Major Phyla

8th • Galaxies and Stars • Life Cycles of Stars (Nebular Theory,

Novas, etc.) • Distances in Astronomy • Light Sources and Reflectors in the

Universe • Cosmology (Universe Origin) • Solar System

• Simple Machines and the Human Body • Blood Pressure and Heart Valves • Organic Chem. / Biochem.

• Observing and Defining Motion • Forces and their Effects • Gravity’s Larges Scale Effects • Basic Atomic Theory • Metals, Non-metals, Inert Gases • Electrons beyond the Bohr Model • Ions and Isotopes • Physical & Chemical Properties • Element vs. Compound Properties • Chemical Bonding • Atoms and Ions Forming Solids • Chemical Equations & Conservation of

Matter • Exothermic vs. Endothermic • Acids, Bases, and pH • Density & Buoyancy • Sound and Light Energy

9th through

12th

• Earth’s Place in the Universe • Dynamic Earth Processes • Energy in the Earth System • Biogeochemical Cycles • Structure and Composition of the

Atmosphere • California Geology

• Cell Biology • Genetics • Ecology • Evolution • Physiology

• Motion and Forces • Conservation of Energy • Heat and Thermodynamics • Waves • Electromagnetic and Magnetic

Phenomena • Atomic and Molecular Structure • Chemical Bonds • Gases • Acids and Bases • Chemical Thermodynamics • Organic and Biochemistry

SCIENCE FAIR

MATERIALS SOURCES

Alin Party Company 4139 Woodruff Ave., Lakewood (562) 420-2489

CM School Supplies 5440 E. Del Amo, Long Beach (562) 429-2425

Home Depot 2450 Cherry Ave., Signal Hill (562) 595-9200 751 Spring St., Signal Hill (562) 426-4667 5000 Hardwick St., Lakewood (562) 529-3500 www.homedepot.com

Lowe’s 7300 E. Carson St., Long Beach (562) 421-9996 2840 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach (562) 496-8120 www.lowes.com

Lyon’s Art Supply 420 E. 4th Street Long Beach, CA (562) 435-5383

Michael’s Crafts 4000 Hardwick St., Lakewood (562) 633-1913 7320 Carson St., Long Beach (562) 377-0669

Office Depot 2301 E. Willow, Signal Hill (562) 427-6333

Radio Shack For a location near you, call (800) 843-7422

Staples 3515 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach (562) 427-6477 4600 Pacific Coast Highway, LB (562) 597-1922 7400 E. Carson St., Long Beach (562) 377-0403 www.staples.com 1-800-378-3-2753

http://www.homedepot.com/

http://www.lowes.com/

http://www.staples.com/

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

If your project deals with aeronautics, then an airport would be a good place to locate information. Airports often employ meteorologists who may help you with a project dealing with weather

Many hospitals have an education department that you can contact. They also have libraries with up-to- date information. Perhaps your family physician or dentist can give you some assistance.

Often veterinarians are willing to help students with science projects. If you need an appointment, call about a week in advance.

Major industries have specialists that may be willing to help. Locate them with your telephone book or magazine advertisements. When writing to corporations, include “Public Relations Department,” in the address on the envelope and in the letter.

Plant specialists can be found at local botanical gardens and nurseries. Sometimes they will donate materials if you explain your project to them.

Naturalists work at nature centers. They will be able to give you information if your project involves natural environments and ecosystems.

Local college and university libraries offer you a wider selection of references than your local library. Scientists on the faculty may help you and even allow you to use their laboratory facilities.

The Yellow Pages of your telephone book, especially a commercial telephone directory, will give you names, addresses, and general product information. When calling anyone, remember to be polite. Give your name and tell exactly why you are calling.

Look in your telephone book for government agencies. Agencies are listed under Federal, State, and Municipal categories. The California Department of Fish and Game in Long Beach is a good source.

The L.A. and San Diego zoos, Sea World, the Cabrillo Marine Aquarium in San Pedro, and the Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific have education departments that are often willing to help. They may be able to arrange a meeting for you with an animal keeper or zoologist.

Send a letter to the address below indicating what topic area you are interested in and they will send you a catalog of available books and pamphlets.

U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents Washington, D.C. 20402

GPO

Zoos and Aquariums Government Agencies

Telephone Books Colleges and Universities

Nature Centers, Parks, and Marine Reserves Botanical Gardens and Commercial Nurseries

Industries Animal Hospitals and Wildlife Rescue Centers

Hospitals and Medical and Dental Offices Airports

INTERNET REFERENCES Internet use and web sites:

• You may get ideas and material from the internet. • You are not allowed to copy a science project from the internet. You must

modify it to contain both a control and a variable • Parents must oversee the web sites that their child visits; many have pop-

ups and links that are not for elementary school age students. • Using information from the web is just like a book, word for word is

plagiarism and you need to include it in your bibliography. • To use copyright protected pictures and text from a web site; you must get permission from the

author. This usually takes a long time. • Include a print out of permission (email is OK) in the bibliography. • Refer to the Web Site list in this handout.

WARNING!

• Anyone can create a Web site; this does not mean its information is correct! • Make sure the web site is run by a large, recognized group such as a college or organization. • DOT “org” or “edu” are generally trustworthy for accuracy of content.

Web site samples that can be used for research:

Description URL Internet Public Library http://www.ipl.org

Within the library, Kid friendly http://www.ipl.org/div/kidspace/projectguide/

National Oceanic & Atmosphere Administration http://www.noaa.gov/

Weather and ocean related phenomena http://www.education.noaa.gov/

US Government web site for kids http://www.kids.gov/

US Geological Survey (USGS) http://www.usgs.gov/

Earthquake section of USGS http://earthquake.usgs.gov/4kids/

Geology section of USGS http://geology.usgs.gov/index.shtml

Fish and Wildlife (Department of the Interior) http://www.fws.gov/

Discovery Channel Science Fair http://school.discovery.com/sciencefaircentral/

Jet Propulsion Laboratory http://jpl.nasa.gov/kids/

How Stuff Works http://www.howstuffworks.com

Science page of How Stuff Works http://www.science.howstuffworks.com

http://www.ipl.org/

http://www.ipl.org/div/kidspace/projectguide/

http://www.noaa.gov/

http://www.education.noaa.gov/

http://www.kids.gov/

http://www.usgs.gov/

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/4kids/

http://geology.usgs.gov/index.shtml

http://www.fws.gov/

http://school.discovery.com/sciencefaircentral/

http://jpl.nasa.gov/kids/

http://www.howstuffworks.com/

http://www.science.howstuffworks.com/

LIBRARY REFERENCES 150 PSYCHOLOGY & SOCIAL SCIENCES

510 MATHEMATICS

Number System Arithmetic Geometry

520 ASTRONOMY

Universe Solar System Moon Planets Meteors Black Hole Comets Sun Constellations Telescope Map Making

530 PHYSICS

Mechanics Matter Gravity Simple Machines Energy and Force Solar Coal Gas Nuclear Sound Light Optics Color Prisms Heat Electricity Magnetism Atomic Energy and Force

540 CHEMISTRY AND ALLIED SCIENCE

Crystallography Mineralogy

550 SCIENCES OF EARTH AND OTHER WORLDS Geology (Earth Science) Structure of the Earth Volcanoes Geysers Floods (Erosions) Caves Earthquakes Oceanography Meteorology Climatology and Weather Economic Geology Metals and Iron Water Gems

560 PALEONTOLOGY (Prehistoric Life)

Fossils Dinosaurs Prehistoric Caves Cave Men Cave Art

570 LIFE SCIENCES

Human Races Anthropology Primitive Societies Physical Anthropology Primitive Man Heredity Prehistoric Man Biology Evolution Microbes (Viruses) Microscopes

580 BOTANY

Propagation Seeds, Flowers, Bulbs Types of Plants Wild Flowers Trees Vegetables Vines