teacher evaluation institute july 23, 2013
DESCRIPTION
Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure . Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013. Critiquing High School Goals. Afternoon Agenda. Critiquing goals using the SMART criteria Creating goals using the SMART criteria. Teacher Q. Grade 10: English - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Teacher Evaluation InstituteJuly 23, 2013
Virginia Department of EducationDivision of Teacher Education and Licensure
![Page 2: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Critiquing High School Goals
![Page 3: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Afternoon Agenda
• Critiquing goals using the SMART criteria
• Creating goals using the SMART criteria
![Page 4: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Teacher Q• Grade 10: English
• Division-developed pre-assessment used
• 50 questions (two points per question)
• Scored on a scale of 0-100 percent; score of 70 percent considered proficient
![Page 5: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Teacher Q: Student English Baseline DataStudent Baseline Score
Student 1 20%Student 2 22%Student 3 26%Student 4 26%Student 5 30%Student 6 30%Student 7 34%Student 8 40%Student 9 42%Student 10 44%Student 11 50%Student 12 50%Student 13 50%Student 14 52%Student 15 54%Student 16 54%Student 17 54%Student 18 60%Student 19 62%Student 20 62%
![Page 6: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Student Baseline English Data: Tiers
0-26% 30-44% 50-62%0
2
4
6
8
10
12
4
6
10
![Page 7: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Teacher QEvaluate: Is this goal SMART?
Goal Statement:
From September 2012, to May 2013, 100 percent of students will make measurable progress in English 10 as measured by the division-developed assessment. All students will improve their baseline score by 30 percentage points.
A good Goal statement is one that is…
• Specific• Measurable• Appropriate• Realistic, but Rigorous• Time-bound
![Page 8: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
How would you improve this goal?
Goal Statement:
From September 2012, to May 2013, 100 percent of students will make measurable progress in English 10 as measured by the division-developed assessment. All students will improve their baseline score by 30 percentage points.
![Page 9: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Improved Goal: One Suggestion
Goal Statement:
From September 2012, to May 2013, 100 percent of students will make measurable progress in English 10 as measured by the division-developed assessment. • Students scoring 20-26 percent on the pre-assessment will
improve their scores by 44 percentage points on the post-assessment.
• Students scoring 30-44 percent on the pre-assessment will improve their scores by 40 percentage points on the post-assessment.
• Students scoring 50-62 percent on the pre-assessment will improve their scores by 34 points on the post-assessment.
![Page 10: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Goals for Students with Disabilities
![Page 11: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Teacher Q and Teacher R of Special Education: Student Baseline Data
Student Baseline ScoreStudent 1 20%Student 2 22%Student 3 26%Student 4 26%Student 5 30%Student 6 30%Student 7 34%Student 8 40%Student 9 42%Student 10 44%Student 11 50%Student 12 50%Student 13 50%Student 14 52%Student 15 54%Student 16 54%Student 17 54%Student 18 60%Student 19 62%Student 20 62%
Students Identified with Disabilities
Teachers Q and R teach using a collaborative model to deliver English instruction.
![Page 12: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Goal Setting Considerations for Students with Disabilities
• Does the student’s disability affect the student’s ability to reach the goal?
• What has been the academic history of the student up to this point?
• What types of instructional interventions have been provided to the student in the past?
![Page 13: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Student 5
Grade Baseline Score End-of-Year Score7 22% 50%8 22% 47%9 28% 52%10 30%
Receives services for English (writing and reading) and speech
Academic History: Reading
Discussion Questions:• Based on this data, is the improved goal written
by Teacher Q appropriate for this student?• What other factors should be considered in
determining an acceptable goal?
![Page 14: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Student 6
Grade Baseline Score End-of-Year Score7 24% 68%8 18% 60%9 28% 48%10 30%
Receives services for English (writing and reading) and mathematics
Academic History: Reading
Discussion Questions:• Based on this data, is the improved goal written
by Teacher Q appropriate for this student?• What other factors should be considered in
determining an acceptable goal?
![Page 15: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Student 7
Grade Baseline Score End-of-Year Score7 30% 76%8 36% 84%9 22% 52%10 34%
Receives services for mathematics
Academic History: Reading
Discussion Questions:• Based on this data, is the improved goal written
by Teacher Q appropriate for this student?• What other factors should be considered in
determining an acceptable goal?
![Page 16: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Art II Teacher S• Art II: Intermediate• Division-developed visual arts knowledge
assessment Visual Communication and Production (10
questions; 7 answered correctly is considered proficient)
Cultural Content and Art History (10 questions; 7 answered correctly is considered proficient)
Judgment and Criticism (10 questions; 7 answered correctly is considered proficient)
Aesthetics (10 questions; 7 answered correctly is considered proficient)
![Page 17: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Teacher S: Student Baseline Data
Visual Communication and Production
Cultural Context and Art History Judgment and Criticism Aesthetics TOTAL
10 possible
7 = Proficient10 possible
7 = Proficient10 possible
7 = Proficient10 possible
7 = Proficient40 possible
28 = ProficientStudent 1 0 0 0 0 0Student 2 0 0 1 0 1Student 3 1 0 0 1 2Student 4 0 1 1 0 2Student 5 1 1 1 0 3Student 6 1 1 2 0 4Student 7 0 1 2 1 4Student 8 1 2 1 0 4Student 9 2 0 1 1 4Student 10 1 0 2 1 4Student 11 1 2 0 1 4Student 12 1 2 0 1 4Student 13 2 0 1 2 5Student 14 2 1 2 0 5Student 15 3 2 0 1 6Student 16 3 1 0 2 6Student 17 2 1 2 1 6Student 18 3 2 1 0 6Student 19 2 2 2 1 7Student 20 2 2 2 4 10Student 21 3 2 1 5 11Student 22 5 6 7 6 24Student 23 8 8 9 7 32AVERAGE 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.5 6.7
![Page 18: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Teacher S Goal Critique: Is this goal SMART?
Goal Statement:
From September 2012, to June 2013, 70 percent of Art II students will score “Proficient” or higher on the division-developed Art II knowledge assessment.
A good Goal statement is one that is…
• Specific• Measurable• Appropriate• Realistic, but Rigorous• Time-bound
![Page 19: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
How would you improve this goal?
Goal Statement:
During the course of the instructional period, 70 percent of Art II students will score “Proficient” or higher on the division-developed Art II knowledge assessment.
![Page 20: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Improved Goal: One SuggestionGoal Statement:
From September 2012, to June 2013, students will make measurable progress in Art II as measured by the division-developed Art II assessment.• Students scoring 0-11 points will improve their scores by 30
points.• Students scoring 12-24 points will improve their scores by 15
points.• Students scoring above 25 points will improve or maintain
their scores by 15 points on the Art II division-developed visual arts assessment.
![Page 21: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Creating Goals
![Page 22: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Goal Writing Practice• Work with your table.
• Choose a content area appropriate for your level.
• Choose four areas that can be assessed in that content area.
• Review the baseline data.
• Write a SMART goal on chart paper.
![Page 23: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Fill-in-Your-Content-Area FILL IN CATEGORY FILL IN CATEGORY FILL IN CATEGORY FILL IN CATEGORY TOTAL 10 possible 10 possible 10 possible 10 possible 40 possible
Student 1 0 1 0 1 2Student 2 2 0 2 1 5Student 3 1 2 3 1 7Student 4 1 1 4 4 10Student 5 3 4 2 2 11Student 6 1 2 4 5 12Student 7 0 4 3 6 13Student 8 3 2 4 5 14Student 9 3 5 3 4 15Student 10 2 2 6 6 16Student 11 3 2 5 6 16Student 12 2 1 6 8 17Student 13 4 3 4 7 18Student 14 1 1 9 8 19Student 15 2 2 8 9 21Student 16 5 6 7 5 23Student 17 8 7 5 4 24Student 18 4 7 5 8 24Student 19 4 5 6 9 24Student 20 7 5 7 6 25Student 21 7 9 10 9 35Student 22 8 9 8 10 35Student 23 9 10 10 10 39AVERAGE 3.5 3.9 5.3 5.8 18.5
![Page 24: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Directions• Trade goals with the other table to which you are
assigned.
• Evaluate the goal for the SMART criteria.
• Provide feedback.
• When it’s time to trade back goals, send one person back with the other table’s goal to explain the feedback.
• Afterward, rewrite your goal based on the comments.
![Page 25: Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568162af550346895dd3333f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Final Thoughts• 3 important things to keep in
mind when setting goals
• 2 things that worked well in this training
• 1 question you still have