teacher incentive allotment(tia)
TRANSCRIPT
Teacher Incentive
Allotment(TIA)
The Teacher Incentive Allotment (TIA) was created by the Texas Legislature as part ofHouse
Bill 3 to provide a realistic pathway for top teachers to earn six-figure salaries and to help
attract and retain highly effective teachers at traditionally hard-to-staffschools.
HB 3 established three levels of designations, recognized, exemplary and master. Teachers can earn
designations in two ways. (1) The first is by obtaining a national board certification which may qualify a teacher
for a recognized designation. (2) The second is through an school system’s approved local designation system.
Approved designation systems may designate teachers as recognized, exemplary and master. These
designations are valid for five years.
$3-$9K$6-
$18K
$12-$32K
For a teacher to earn a designation or generate allotment funding they need to be employed as a
teacher and have an active standard or lifetime Texas Teacher certification. (NOTE:
Noncertified teachers are ineligible.)
Teacher DesignationsDistricts have the option to locally develop or identify a system for designating high-
performing teachers as Recognized, Exemplary, or Master. Districts that employ teachers
with designations can receive up to $32,000 per year in TIA funding per designated teacher.
Designations are added to a teacher’s SBEC certificate and are valid for five years. If a
teacher moves to a new district, the allotment funding follows the teacher to the new district
regardless of whether the new district has an approved designation system in place.
Teachers with National Board Certification may be eligible to earn an automatic Recognized
designation regardless of whether the district in which the teacher works is participating in
TIA.
National Board CertificationNational Board Certification is a voluntary advanced professional certification for PreK-12
educators that identifies teaching expertise through a performance-based, peer-reviewed
assessment. Teachers are certified based on standards set by the National Board for
Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). More than 125,000 teachers across all 50states
have achieved National Board Certification.
The certification process is designed to collect standards-based evidence of accomplished
practice, and on average takes 1-3 years to complete. To become a Board-certified teacher,
eligible candidates must demonstrate advanced knowledge, skills, and practice in their
individual certificate area by completing four components: three portfolio entries and a
computer-based assessment. The content knowledge component is a computer-based
assessment taken at a testing center; the other three are portfolio-based and are submitted
through an electronic portfolio system.
National Board Certification Reimbursement
• The Teacher Incentive Allotment will reimburse districts up to $1,900 for initial certification, up to $1,250 for renewal,
and up to $495 for MOC. Fees paid toward certification and renewal are eligible if the certification or renewal was
achieved following the passage of House Bill 3 in summer2019.
• The initial cost for each of the four components is $475, with the total cost for the initial attempt of all four components
being $1,900. Retake attempts require an additional fee. For each assessment cycle a teacher plans to take
components, a $75 nonrefundable and nontransferable registration fee is required and must be paid before
purchasing a component.
• For teachers who were certified in 2017 or later, National Board Certification is active for a period of five years. Prior
to 2017, certification lasted up to 10 years. Current National Board Certified Teachers (NBCTs) nearing their
certification expiration date can renew their certification for a period of 10 years. The fee for renewal is $1,250.
However, starting in 2021, the National Board will no longer extend certificates through the current 10-year renewal
process. Instead, it will extend certification through its Maintenance of Certification (MOC) process. Successfully
meeting MOC requirements will extend an NBCT’s certificate by five years from their current certificate’s expiration
date. The MOC will cost $495 plus a $75 registration fee.
National Board Certified Teachers in Texas
622 active NBCTs
183 candidates
327 designated in 2019-2020, $1.2 million
250 estimated new designations in 2020-2021
20+ districts offer additional stipends toNBCTs
Interested Candidates: National Board Certification may take anywhere from one to five years. Annual
registration windows run from April through February. Following completion of the four components, scores
are released in December of each year. Annual registration fee: $75 Individual component fees (4):$475
each Renewal Fee: $1250 Maintenance of Certification (MOC): $495+ $75 registration fee
Allotment funding is based on the designation level, socio-economic level of students and
rural or non rural status of the campus. Lancaster ISD not considered to be rural.
Campus number Campus name District name Region Recognized Allotment Exemplary Allotment Master Allotment
057913001 LANCASTER H S LANCASTER ISD 10 5641 11281 20802
057913041 LANCASTER MIDDLE LANCASTER ISD 10 5992 11983 21972
057913042G W CARVER 6TH GRADE
STEM LEARNING CENTERLANCASTER ISD 10 6021 12042 22071
057913101 PLEASANT RUN EL LANCASTER ISD 10 6510 13020 23700
057913102 HOUSTON EL LANCASTER ISD 10 5438 10876 20126
057913103 WEST MAIN EL LANCASTER ISD 10 5937 11875 21791
057913106ROSA PARKS/MILLBROOK
ELLANCASTER ISD 10 4964 9927 18545
057913107 ROLLING HILLS EL LANCASTER ISD 10 6541 13082 23803
057913109 BELT LINE EL LANCASTER ISD 10 6149 12298 22497
TIA Designation Allotments for
Lancaster ISD (can change each year)
Lancaster ISD TIA Committee
The Lancaster ISD TIA Committee consists of teachers from every campus, principals, and
central office staff. The committee has met throughout the months of February and March to
determine the designation criteria.
Principals have presented an overview of the TIA to their staff and will also present the final
designation criteria once finalized.
Communication has been sent out district-wide to inform teachers about the TIA process
and more information about the Lancaster ISD TIA Committee can be found on our website.
If the TIA Application is approved, then the TIA Designation Criteria will be submitted for
Board Approval as part of our compensation plan for the 2021-2022 School Year. Data will
be captured during the 2021-2022 School Year and teachers would receive pay during
September of 2023.
TEJ'ilsDistrict Designation System ComponentsTexas Educatfon A9ant'1
·n..:.--Teacher
Observation
Student
Performance
Optional:
Additional
Factors
• Observation based on T-TESS or lo cally-developed rubric
• Distri ct application must show evidence of validity & reliabilit y
• Student performance measures determined by distr ict
• Distri ct application must show evidence of validity & reliabilit y
• District s may consider addit ional factors in making designat ions
(e.g., mentoringother teachers, student surveys, etc.).
Teacher Observation Designation CriteriaThe following shows the minimum average scores across T-TESS domains 2 and 3 to achieve each level of designation
(Recognized, Exemplary, and Master). The minimum average scores were derived from an analysis of T-TESS observations
from across the state with scores on a 1 to 5 scale.
T-TESS Dimensions – 1: Planning, 2: Instruction, 3: Learning Environment, 4: Professional Practices and Responsibilities
NIET TAP Dimensions – 1:Instruction, 2: Environment, 3: Planning, 4: Responsibilities
NOTE: Traditionally, 50% of LISD teachers had a 3.5 or higher SKR score.
Lancaster will use the AVERAGE score and not the SKR score, because the SKR can only round up to half point
increments.
LISD/State-wide Teacher Observation Minimum Average Rating State Percentile LISD
Recognized 3.7 (74% of
possible points)
At least 3 (proficient on all
dimensions)
67th percentile 3.5 average
score required
Exemplary 3.9 (78% of
possible points)
At least 3 (proficient on all
dimensions)
80th percentile 3.5 average
score required
Master 4.5 (90% of
possible points)
At least 3 (proficient on all
dimensions)
95th percentile 3.5 average
score required
Student Growth Criteria• Student growth for self contained teachers will be
based on reading scores only. Student growth using
the NWEA MAP Assessment will be used to determine
growth for K-8 Math, Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra
II. No other subject/grades will be eligible for math.
• District application must show evidence of validity
and reliability.
• The Circle Assessment will be used to determine
growth for PK teachers.
• The MAPS test will only be used for K-12 Reading
and K-8 Math, Geometry, Algebra I, and Algebra II.
• The district plans to phase in all teachers over thenext
2 years by either purchasing additional assessments
with MAPs (science) and using SLOs or portfolios for
other non tested areas.
NOTE: Teachers must have at least 60% for
student growth to even be considered
eligible or qualify for the TIA. The numbers
above reflect the standards for the various
designations. However, a teacher may get
the minimum qualifier and have an average
score that meets the final designation
formula criteria.
LISD Criteria
Other Criteria- Responsibilities Rubric
NOTE: You must have at least at 3.5 in this area order to qualify or be eligible for a designation.
District Responsibilities
Rubric
Recognized 3.7
Exemplary 3.9
Master 4.5
Recognized:
3.7 ? ??
5 20
Teacher Observation
Recognizedcutpoint based onperformance standards =
Highest possiblepoints based onperformancestandards
Percentage ofcomponent thatdistrict is using for teacher observation14.8
70 ? ??
100 70
Student GrowthRecognizedcutpoint based onperformance standards
Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent thatdistrict is using for student growth
49
14.8 + 49 + 7.4 =71.2
Recognized Designation Score
Observatio
n Weight
Growth
Measure
Weight
Responsibilities
Weight
20% 70% 10%
Recognizedcutpoint basedonperformance standards =
Responsibilities Rubric
3.7 ? ??
5 10Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Recognized cutpoint based onperformance standards =
Percentage ofcomponent thatdistrict is using for teacher observation
7.4
Exemplary:
3.9 ? ??
5 20
Teacher Observation
Recognized cutpoint based onperformance
standards =
Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent that districtis using for teacher observation15.6
=75 ? ??
Student GrowthRecognized cutpoint based onperformancestandards
Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent thatdistrict is using for student growth
52.5
15.6 + 52.5 + 7.8 =75.9
Exemplary Designation Score
Observatio
n Weight
Growth
Measure
Weight
Responsibilities
Weight
20% 70% 10%
Recognizedcutpoint based onperformance standards
100 70
Responsibilities Rubric
=3.9 ? ??
105
Recognized cutpoint based onperformancestandards
Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent that districtis using for teacher observation7.8
Master:
4.5 ? ??
5 20
Teacher Observation
Recognized cutpoint based onperformance standards =Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent thatdistrict is using for teacher observation18
80 ? ??
100 70
Student GrowthRecognized cutpoint based onperformancestandards
Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent thatdistrict is using forstudent growth
56
18 + 56 + 9 = 83
Master Designation Score
Observation
Weight
Growth Measure
Weight
Responsibilities
Weight
20% 70% 10%
Recognizedcutpoint based onperformance standards =
Responsibilities Rubric
4.5 ? ??=
5 10Highest possiblepoints based onperformance standards
Recognizedcutpoint basedonperformance standards
Percentage ofcomponent that districtis using for teacher observation9
Final Designation Criteria:
Designation Total Points Combined
Recognized 71.2
Exemplary 75.9
Master 83
Allotment Spending:90% Teacher Compensation (Designated Teachers)
10% District Administrative Fees
Teacher TAP AVG Score ResponsibilitiesPercent of students that met
or exceeded growthDesignation
A (4.0)/5 = 16/20 (3.8)/5 =7.6/10 (65%)/100 = 45.5/70 16 + 7.6 + 45.5= 69.1
No Designation
B (3.8)/5 = 15.2/20 (3.8)/5 = 7.6/10 (75%)/100 = 52.5/70 14 + 7 + 52.5 = 75.3
Recognized
C (3.9)/5 = 15.6/20 (3.5)/5 = 7/10 (80%)/100 = 56/70 15.6 + 7 + 56= 78.6
Exemplary
D (4.3)/5 = 17.2/20 (4.0)/5 = 8/10 (83%)/100 = 58.1/70 17.2 + 8 + 58.1 = 83.3
Master
Determining
DesignationsSample Data Set
Designation Level Points Needed
Recognized 71.2
Exemplary 75.9
Master 83
TEA8
Possible Sequence for District ApprovalsTexas Education Agancy
i--1 2 3
5
, :14
Dist r ict
designates
teachers.Dist r icts
submit
applications
Dist ri ct s
receive st at e
fun ding to be
used primarily
for teac her
pay
Dist ri ct s
identifyhighly-
effect ive
teach ers using
st atewide
st an da rds &
submit
eviden ce of
effectiveness
St ate places
desi gnat ions
on t eacher
cert ificat es
TEA & Texas
Tech
Universi t y
review
applicat ions
and evidence
and approve
dist r ict
designa tion
systems