teaching evaluations of sudip gupta - kelley school of business · 2015. 9. 22. · semester:...
TRANSCRIPT
Teaching Evaluations of Sudip Gupta Course Name University Level Average
Rating Equity and Fixed Income Investments
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
Undergraduate 6.74/7
Intermediate Corporate Finance
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
Undergraduate 6.3/7
Foundations of Finance
Stern School of Business, New York University
Undergraduate and MBA
6.2/7
International Finance
RH Smith School of Business, University of Maryland
Undergraduate 4.47/5
Investments RH Smith School of Business, University of Maryland
Undergraduate 3.75/5
Advanced Portfolio Management
Indian School of Business MBA 5.5/7
Behavioral Finance
Indian School of Business MBA 5.1/7
Financial Econometrics
Indian School of Business Ph.D. 7/7
Graduate Econometrics I
University of Wisconsin Madison
Ph.D. 4.44/5
Graduate Econometrics II
University of Wisconsin Madison
Ph.D. 4.23/5
Microeconomics University of Wisconsin Madison
Undergraduate 3.93-‐4.1/5
1/28/15 1:03 PMSET
Page 1 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=11638&sem=FA14
Indiana UniversityKelley School of Business
Fall 2014Instructor Teaching Evaluation
forCourse: F420 Section: 11638 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Campus: Bloomington Number Enrolled: 41
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 1. The subject matter of the course has been mentally challenging. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 20 6.50 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0% 0.51
Item 2. The instructor was fair and impartial in dealing with students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 6 14 20 6.70 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 100.0% 0.47
Item 3. The instructor shows a genuine interest in his/her students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 5 14 20 6.65 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 100.0% 0.59
Item 4. The instructor made the subject matter more meaningful to me through the use ofexamples and applications.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 19 6.63 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 100.0% 0.50
Item 5. The instructor respected student questions and views about the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 6 13 19 6.68 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 100.0% 0.48
Item 6. The examination and assignment grades reflected my ability to apply what Ihad learned.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 3 6 10 19 6.37 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 31.6 52.6 100.0% 0.76
Item 7. I feel I learned a lot in this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 2 6 11 19 6.47 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 100.0% 0.70
Item 8. The instructor has been very helpful and concerned that the students understandthe subject matter of this course.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 6 13 19 6.68 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 100.0% 0.48
Item 9. The instructor was well prepared for class meetings. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 19 6.63 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 100.0% 0.50
1/28/15 1:03 PMSET
Page 2 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=11638&sem=FA14
Item 10. The examinations covered the important aspects of the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 19 6.63 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 100.0% 0.50
Semester: Fall 2014 Course: F420 Section: 11638 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 11. The instructor displayed an enthusiastic interest in the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 19 6.74 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 100.0% 0.45
Item 12. The instructor created an environment in which students felt comfortableasking questions and expressing their views.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 6 13 19 6.68 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 100.0% 0.48
Item 13. Explanations of the material in this course were clear and to the point. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 7 11 19 6.53 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 100.0% 0.61
Item 14. This course helped me gain useful knowledge and/or skills. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 5 13 19 6.63 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 26.3 68.4 100.0% 0.60
Item 15. My examination and assignment grades reflect how much I have learned. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 7 11 19 6.53 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 100.0% 0.61
Item 16. This course has stimulated me to learn more about the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 7 11 19 6.53 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 100.0% 0.61
Item 17. All things considered, I have benefited from having taken this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 5 13 19 6.63 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 26.3 68.4 100.0% 0.60
Item 18. Overall, I would rate this instructor as outstanding. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 19 6.74 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 100.0% 0.45
Item 18 Median: 7.00Item 19. This course has required more of my time and effort than most other courses
at the same level. Frequency 0 0 0 3 6 10 0 19 5.37 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 31.6 52.6 0.0 100.0% 0.76
Item 20. The average number of hours per week of work outside of the classroom requiredby this course was:
(0-2) (3-4) (5-6) (7-8) (9-10) (11-14) (More)
1/28/15 1:03 PMSET
Page 3 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=11638&sem=FA14
Frequency 5 6 3 3 1 1 0 19 2.58 Percent 26.3 31.6 15.8 15.8 5.3 5.3 0.0 100.0% 1.46
Reference Group Comparison Item 18 Dean's 8 (Items 4,7,9,11,12,13,17,18) Mean % of 7s (StrA) Mean St. Dev. MedianCourse: F420 Section: 11638 6.74 73.7 6.63 0.43 6.88BL-Undergraduate Electives 6.03 49.6 6.06 1.09 6.38
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 1 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=16667&sem=SP14
Indiana UniversityKelley School of Business
Spring 2014Instructor Teaching Evaluation
forCourse: F305 Section: 16667 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Campus: Bloomington Number Enrolled: 42
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 1. The subject matter of the course has been mentally challenging. Frequency 0 0 0 0 6 13 16 35 6.29 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.1 37.1 45.7 100.0% 0.75
Item 2. The instructor was fair and impartial in dealing with students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 2 17 16 35 6.40 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 48.6 45.7 100.0% 0.60
Item 3. The instructor shows a genuine interest in his/her students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 4 15 16 35 6.34 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 42.9 45.7 100.0% 0.68
Item 4. The instructor made the subject matter more meaningful to me through the use ofexamples and applications.
Frequency 0 0 0 2 2 18 13 35 6.20 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.7 51.4 37.1 100.0% 0.80
Item 5. The instructor respected student questions and views about the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 2 5 15 13 35 6.11 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 14.3 42.9 37.1 100.0% 0.87
Item 6. The examination and assignment grades reflected my ability to apply what Ihad learned.
Frequency 0 0 0 3 7 16 9 35 5.89 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 20.0 45.7 25.7 100.0% 0.90
Item 7. I feel I learned a lot in this course. Frequency 0 0 0 1 4 18 12 35 6.17 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 11.4 51.4 34.3 100.0% 0.75
Item 8. The instructor has been very helpful and concerned that the students understandthe subject matter of this course.
Frequency 0 0 1 0 7 13 14 35 6.11 Percent 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 20.0 37.1 40.0 100.0% 0.93
Item 9. The instructor was well prepared for class meetings. Frequency 0 0 0 1 1 14 19 35 6.46 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 40.0 54.3 100.0% 0.70
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 2 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=16667&sem=SP14
Item 10. The examinations covered the important aspects of the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 3 1 17 14 35 6.20 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 2.9 48.6 40.0 100.0% 0.87
Semester: Spring 2014 Course: F305 Section: 16667 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 11. The instructor displayed an enthusiastic interest in the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 3 15 17 35 6.40 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 42.9 48.6 100.0% 0.65
Item 12. The instructor created an environment in which students felt comfortableasking questions and expressing their views.
Frequency 0 1 0 0 4 15 15 35 6.20 Percent 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 11.4 42.9 42.9 100.0% 0.99
Item 13. Explanations of the material in this course were clear and to the point. Frequency 0 0 3 0 6 14 12 35 5.91 Percent 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 17.1 40.0 34.3 100.0% 1.15
Item 14. This course helped me gain useful knowledge and/or skills. Frequency 0 0 0 1 3 19 12 35 6.20 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 8.6 54.3 34.3 100.0% 0.72
Item 15. My examination and assignment grades reflect how much I have learned. Frequency 0 0 1 1 8 17 8 35 5.86 Percent 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 22.9 48.6 22.9 100.0% 0.91
Item 16. This course has stimulated me to learn more about the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 1 3 21 10 35 6.14 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 8.6 60.0 28.6 100.0% 0.69
Item 17. All things considered, I have benefited from having taken this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 5 18 12 35 6.20 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 51.4 34.3 100.0% 0.68
Item 18. Overall, I would rate this instructor as outstanding. Frequency 0 0 0 0 5 17 13 35 6.23 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 48.6 37.1 100.0% 0.69
Item 18 Median: 6.00Item 19. This course has required more of my time and effort than most other courses
at the same level. Frequency 0 0 0 4 11 16 4 35 5.57 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 31.4 45.7 11.4 100.0% 0.85
Item 20. The average number of hours per week of work outside of the classroom requiredby this course was:
(0-2) (3-4) (5-6) (7-8) (9-10) (11-14) (More)
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 3 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=16667&sem=SP14
Frequency 2 14 13 3 2 1 0 35 2.77 Percent 5.7 40.0 37.1 8.6 5.7 2.9 0.0 100.0% 1.09
Reference Group Comparison Item 18 Dean's 8 (Items 4,7,9,11,12,13,17,18) Mean % of 7s (StrA) Mean St. Dev. MedianCourse: F305 Section: 16667 6.23 37.1 6.22 0.60 6.13BL-Undergraduate Electives 6.11 51.5 6.15 1.01 6.38
6/2/14 2:23 PMSET
Page 1 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=22674&sem=SP14
Indiana UniversityKelley School of Business
Spring 2014Instructor Teaching Evaluation
forCourse: F305 Section: 22674 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Campus: Bloomington Number Enrolled: 40
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 1. The subject matter of the course has been mentally challenging. Frequency 0 0 0 0 2 8 14 24 6.50 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 100.0% 0.66
Item 2. The instructor was fair and impartial in dealing with students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 24 6.54 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 100.0% 0.51
Item 3. The instructor shows a genuine interest in his/her students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 24 6.54 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 100.0% 0.51
Item 4. The instructor made the subject matter more meaningful to me through the use ofexamples and applications.
Frequency 0 0 1 0 1 7 15 24 6.46 Percent 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 4.2 29.2 62.5 100.0% 0.93
Item 5. The instructor respected student questions and views about the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 10 14 24 6.58 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 100.0% 0.50
Item 6. The examination and assignment grades reflected my ability to apply what Ihad learned.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 2 9 13 24 6.46 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 37.5 54.2 100.0% 0.66
Item 7. I feel I learned a lot in this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 12 11 24 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 100.0% 0.58
Item 8. The instructor has been very helpful and concerned that the students understandthe subject matter of this course.
Frequency 0 0 1 0 0 10 13 24 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 41.7 54.2 100.0% 0.88
Item 9. The instructor was well prepared for class meetings. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 9 15 24 6.63 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 100.0% 0.49
6/2/14 2:23 PMSET
Page 2 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=22674&sem=SP14
Item 10. The examinations covered the important aspects of the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 9 14 24 6.54 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 100.0% 0.59
Semester: Spring 2014 Course: F305 Section: 22674 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 11. The instructor displayed an enthusiastic interest in the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 24 6.50 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0% 0.51
Item 12. The instructor created an environment in which students felt comfortableasking questions and expressing their views.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 9 13 23 6.52 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 100.0% 0.59
Item 13. Explanations of the material in this course were clear and to the point. Frequency 0 1 1 0 2 9 11 24 6.08 Percent 0.0 4.2 4.2 0.0 8.3 37.5 45.8 100.0% 1.28
Item 14. This course helped me gain useful knowledge and/or skills. Frequency 0 0 0 0 2 9 13 24 6.46 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 37.5 54.2 100.0% 0.66
Item 15. My examination and assignment grades reflect how much I have learned. Frequency 0 0 0 1 0 11 12 24 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 100.0% 0.72
Item 16. This course has stimulated me to learn more about the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 1 0 1 9 13 24 6.38 Percent 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 4.2 37.5 54.2 100.0% 0.92
Item 17. All things considered, I have benefited from having taken this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 2 10 12 24 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 100.0% 0.65
Item 18. Overall, I would rate this instructor as outstanding. Frequency 0 0 0 1 2 8 13 24 6.38 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 8.3 33.3 54.2 100.0% 0.82
Item 18 Median: 7.00Item 19. This course has required more of my time and effort than most other courses
at the same level. Frequency 0 0 0 3 3 10 6 22 5.86 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 13.6 45.5 27.3 100.0% 0.99
Item 20. The average number of hours per week of work outside of the classroom requiredby this course was:
(0-2) (3-4) (5-6) (7-8) (9-10) (11-14) (More)
6/2/14 2:23 PMSET
Page 3 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=22674&sem=SP14
Frequency 1 6 8 3 2 0 2 22 3.32 Percent 4.5 27.3 36.4 13.6 9.1 0.0 9.1 100.0% 1.55
Reference Group Comparison Item 18 Dean's 8 (Items 4,7,9,11,12,13,17,18) Mean % of 7s (StrA) Mean St. Dev. MedianCourse: F305 Section: 22674 6.38 54.2 6.40 0.61 6.50BL-Undergraduate Electives 6.11 51.5 6.15 1.01 6.38
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 1 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=23573&sem=SP14
Indiana UniversityKelley School of Business
Spring 2014Instructor Teaching Evaluation
forCourse: F305 Section: 23573 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Campus: Bloomington Number Enrolled: 39
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 1. The subject matter of the course has been mentally challenging. Frequency 0 0 0 1 0 9 7 17 6.29 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 52.9 41.2 100.0% 0.77
Item 2. The instructor was fair and impartial in dealing with students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 3 6 8 17 6.29 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 35.3 47.1 100.0% 0.77
Item 3. The instructor shows a genuine interest in his/her students. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 10 6 17 6.29 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 100.0% 0.59
Item 4. The instructor made the subject matter more meaningful to me through the use ofexamples and applications.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 10 6 17 6.29 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 100.0% 0.59
Item 5. The instructor respected student questions and views about the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 9 7 17 6.35 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 100.0% 0.61
Item 6. The examination and assignment grades reflected my ability to apply what Ihad learned.
Frequency 0 0 1 0 2 12 2 17 5.82 Percent 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 11.8 70.6 11.8 100.0% 0.88
Item 7. I feel I learned a lot in this course. Frequency 0 0 0 1 1 8 7 17 6.24 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.9 47.1 41.2 100.0% 0.83
Item 8. The instructor has been very helpful and concerned that the students understandthe subject matter of this course.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 9 7 17 6.35 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 100.0% 0.61
Item 9. The instructor was well prepared for class meetings. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 17 6.53 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 100.0% 0.51
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 2 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=23573&sem=SP14
Item 10. The examinations covered the important aspects of the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 1 2 11 3 17 5.94 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 11.8 64.7 17.6 100.0% 0.75
Semester: Spring 2014 Course: F305 Section: 23573 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 11. The instructor displayed an enthusiastic interest in the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 11 6 17 6.35 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 100.0% 0.49
Item 12. The instructor created an environment in which students felt comfortableasking questions and expressing their views.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 11 6 17 6.35 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 100.0% 0.49
Item 13. Explanations of the material in this course were clear and to the point. Frequency 0 0 0 0 5 8 4 17 5.94 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 47.1 23.5 100.0% 0.75
Item 14. This course helped me gain useful knowledge and/or skills. Frequency 0 0 0 1 0 10 6 17 6.24 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 100.0% 0.75
Item 15. My examination and assignment grades reflect how much I have learned. Frequency 0 0 1 0 2 12 2 17 5.82 Percent 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 11.8 70.6 11.8 100.0% 0.88
Item 16. This course has stimulated me to learn more about the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 17 6.18 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.5 35.3 41.2 100.0% 0.81
Item 17. All things considered, I have benefited from having taken this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 7 9 17 6.47 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 100.0% 0.62
Item 18. Overall, I would rate this instructor as outstanding. Frequency 0 0 0 0 3 7 7 17 6.24 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 41.2 41.2 100.0% 0.75
Item 18 Median: 6.00Item 19. This course has required more of my time and effort than most other courses
at the same level. Frequency 0 0 1 1 3 9 3 17 5.71 Percent 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.9 17.6 52.9 17.6 100.0% 1.05
Item 20. The average number of hours per week of work outside of the classroom requiredby this course was:
(0-2) (3-4) (5-6) (7-8) (9-10) (11-14) (More)
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 3 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=23573&sem=SP14
Frequency 1 5 7 1 3 0 0 17 3.00 Percent 5.9 29.4 41.2 5.9 17.6 0.0 0.0 100.0% 1.17
Reference Group Comparison Item 18 Dean's 8 (Items 4,7,9,11,12,13,17,18) Mean % of 7s (StrA) Mean St. Dev. MedianCourse: F305 Section: 23573 6.24 41.2 6.30 0.44 6.38BL-Undergraduate Electives 6.11 51.5 6.15 1.01 6.38
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 1 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=24026&sem=SP14
Indiana UniversityKelley School of Business
Spring 2014Instructor Teaching Evaluation
forCourse: F305 Section: 24026 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Campus: Bloomington Number Enrolled: 39
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 1. The subject matter of the course has been mentally challenging. Frequency 1 0 0 1 5 13 11 31 5.97 Percent 3.2 0.0 0.0 3.2 16.1 41.9 35.5 100.0% 1.22
Item 2. The instructor was fair and impartial in dealing with students. Frequency 0 0 1 0 1 17 12 31 6.26 Percent 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 3.2 54.8 38.7 100.0% 0.82
Item 3. The instructor shows a genuine interest in his/her students. Frequency 0 0 1 0 4 14 11 30 6.13 Percent 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 13.3 46.7 36.7 100.0% 0.90
Item 4. The instructor made the subject matter more meaningful to me through the use ofexamples and applications.
Frequency 0 1 1 0 3 12 14 31 6.13 Percent 0.0 3.2 3.2 0.0 9.7 38.7 45.2 100.0% 1.18
Item 5. The instructor respected student questions and views about the subject matter. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 18 13 31 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 100.0% 0.50
Item 6. The examination and assignment grades reflected my ability to apply what Ihad learned.
Frequency 1 1 0 1 4 15 9 31 5.81 Percent 3.2 3.2 0.0 3.2 12.9 48.4 29.0 100.0% 1.38
Item 7. I feel I learned a lot in this course. Frequency 0 2 0 1 1 15 12 31 6.03 Percent 0.0 6.5 0.0 3.2 3.2 48.4 38.7 100.0% 1.28
Item 8. The instructor has been very helpful and concerned that the students understandthe subject matter of this course.
Frequency 0 0 1 0 3 14 13 31 6.23 Percent 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 9.7 45.2 41.9 100.0% 0.88
Item 9. The instructor was well prepared for class meetings. Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 16 14 31 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 100.0% 0.56
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 2 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=24026&sem=SP14
Item 10. The examinations covered the important aspects of the subject matter. Frequency 0 1 0 0 3 16 11 31 6.13 Percent 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 9.7 51.6 35.5 100.0% 0.99
Semester: Spring 2014 Course: F305 Section: 24026 Instructor: Sudip Gupta
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly Course MeanDisagree Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Agree Agree Total St. Dev.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Item 11. The instructor displayed an enthusiastic interest in the subject matter of this course. Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 18 13 31 6.42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 100.0% 0.50
Item 12. The instructor created an environment in which students felt comfortableasking questions and expressing their views.
Frequency 0 0 0 0 1 17 13 31 6.39 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 100.0% 0.56
Item 13. Explanations of the material in this course were clear and to the point. Frequency 0 1 1 0 3 16 10 31 6.00 Percent 0.0 3.2 3.2 0.0 9.7 51.6 32.3 100.0% 1.13
Item 14. This course helped me gain useful knowledge and/or skills. Frequency 0 2 0 1 1 14 13 31 6.06 Percent 0.0 6.5 0.0 3.2 3.2 45.2 41.9 100.0% 1.29
Item 15. My examination and assignment grades reflect how much I have learned. Frequency 0 1 1 2 3 15 9 31 5.84 Percent 0.0 3.2 3.2 6.5 9.7 48.4 29.0 100.0% 1.21
Item 16. This course has stimulated me to learn more about the subject matter of this course. Frequency 2 0 0 1 1 15 12 31 5.97 Percent 6.5 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.2 48.4 38.7 100.0% 1.49
Item 17. All things considered, I have benefited from having taken this course. Frequency 0 2 0 1 1 15 12 31 6.03 Percent 0.0 6.5 0.0 3.2 3.2 48.4 38.7 100.0% 1.28
Item 18. Overall, I would rate this instructor as outstanding. Frequency 0 0 1 0 1 14 15 31 6.35 Percent 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 3.2 45.2 48.4 100.0% 0.84
Item 18 Median: 6.00Item 19. This course has required more of my time and effort than most other courses
at the same level. Frequency 0 0 2 3 6 16 2 29 5.45 Percent 0.0 0.0 6.9 10.3 20.7 55.2 6.9 100.0% 1.02
Item 20. The average number of hours per week of work outside of the classroom requiredby this course was:
(0-2) (3-4) (5-6) (7-8) (9-10) (11-14) (More)
6/2/14 2:24 PMSET
Page 3 of 3https://kelley.iu.edu/tsresearch/secure/SET_TES_Secure/SET_TES_results_print.cfm?section_no=24026&sem=SP14
Frequency 4 8 9 2 5 1 0 29 2.97 Percent 13.8 27.6 31.0 6.9 17.2 3.4 0.0 100.0% 1.40
Reference Group Comparison Item 18 Dean's 8 (Items 4,7,9,11,12,13,17,18) Mean % of 7s (StrA) Mean St. Dev. MedianCourse: F305 Section: 24026 6.35 48.4 6.22 0.80 6.25BL-Undergraduate Electives 6.11 51.5 6.15 1.01 6.38
sgupta logged in [ logout ]
Course Faculty Evaluations
HomeSubmit CFEsFAQs CFE Results View Comments
Back
View as Graph | View as Text
Course No: FINC-UB.0002.005
Course Title: FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCE
Semester: SPRING 2013
Instructor: GUPTA, SUDIP
Registered: 57
Responded: 32 / 30 ( trimmed )
Response Rate: 56.1
Expected Grade Percentages
A B C D F
71.9% 28.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Average Expected Grade
3.7
Trimmed Response Count
30 [5% trimmed at ends]
StrongDisagreement
StrongAgreement
Mean S.D. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N/A
1. The instructor was well prepared. 6.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 31.2 59.4 0.0
The instructor was well prepared. [trimmed] 6.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 0.0
2. The instructor communicated well. 6.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 25.0 34.4 37.5 0.0
The instructor communicated well. [trimmed] 6.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 36.7 36.7 0.0
3. The instructor motivated me to learn. 5.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 12.5 9.4 37.5 37.5 0.0
The instructor motivated me to learn. [trimmed]
6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 10.0 40.0 36.7 0.0
4. Overall evaluation of the instructor. 6.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 12.5 40.6 40.6 0.0
Overall evaluation of the instructor. [trimmed]
6.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 13.3 43.3 40.0 0.0
5. This course was intellectually challenging andmade me think.
6.1 1.3 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 15.6 28.1 46.9 3.1
This course was intellectually challenging and
6.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 16.7 30.0 46.7 3.3
made me think. [trimmed]
Scale for Question 6 ONLY Mean S.D. -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
6. This course was appropriately demanding ofmy time.
0.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 56.2 12.5 3.1
This course was appropriately demanding ofmy time. [trimmed]
0.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 0.0
-3 = Not Demanding Enough +3 = Too Demanding
7. The course increased my interest in this subjectarea.
5.3 1.4 3.1 3.1 0.0 15.6 25.0 37.5 15.6 0.0
The course increased my interest in this subjectarea. [trimmed]
5.4 1.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 16.7 26.7 40.0 13.3 0.0
8. Overall evaluation of the course. 5.8 1.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.1 21.9 46.9 25.0 0.0
Overall evaluation of the course. [trimmed] 5.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 23.3 50.0 23.3 0.0
9. To what extent would you recommend thiscourse to a friend?
5.8 1.2 0.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 21.9 34.4 31.2 3.1
To what extent would you recommend thiscourse to a friend? [trimmed]
5.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 3.3 23.3 36.7 30.0 3.3
Copyright © 2008 Leonard N. Stern School of Business
Department of EconomicsSocial Science Bldg. University of Wisconsin-Madison 1180 Observatory Drive Madison, Wisconsin 53706
608/263-2989 Fax: 608/262-2033
Teaching Summary for Sudip Gupta
Semester Course Course TitleIndividualEvaluation
Score
*AverageEvaluation
Score(all TAs)
Spring 2004 Econ 101Head TA
Principles ofMicroeconomics
3.88 3.86
Fall 2003 Econ 101Head TA
Principles ofMicroeconomics
3.93 3.79
Spring 2003 Econ 101 Principles ofMicroeconomics
4.12 3.97
Spring 2002 Econ 710 Econ Stats &Econometrics II
4.23 3.88
Fall 2001 Econ 709 Econ Stats &Econometrics I
4.44 3.74
Spring 2001 Econ 101 Principles ofMicroeconomics
3.91 3.76
Fall 2000 Econ 101 Principles ofMicroeconomics
3.93 3.83
*Evaluation Score is generated from the student response to the following question: Weknow how the professor conducts the course often influences what a TA is able to do in acourse. Given the professor’s role and the structure of this course, how would you evaluateyour TA’s performance. (5=excellent, 4=good, 3=average, 2=fair, and 1= poor).