teaching from the emerging now

26
TEACHING FROM THE EMERGING NOW

Upload: others

Post on 25-Mar-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

TEACHING FROM THE EMERGING NOW

This page intentionally left blank

TEACHING FROM THE EMERGING NOW

BY

LINNETTE R. L. WERNER

Hamline University, USA

AND

DAVID HELLSTROM

University of Minnesota, USA

United Kingdom – North America – Japan – India Malaysia – China

Emerald Publishing LimitedHoward House, Wagon Lane, Bingley BD16 1WA, UK

First edition 2021

Copyright © 2021 Linnette Werner, David Hellstrom. Published under exclusive license by Emerald Publishing Limited.

Reprints and permissions serviceContact: [email protected]

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying issued in the UK by The Copyright Licensing Agency and in the USA by The Copyright Clearance Center. Any opinions expressed in the chapters are those of the authors. Whilst Emerald makes every effort to ensure the quality and accuracy of its content, Emerald makes no representation implied or otherwise, as to the chapters’ suitability and application and disclaims any warranties, express or implied, to their use.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN: 978-1-80043-725-8 (Print)ISBN: 978-1-80043-724-1 (Online)ISBN: 978-1-80043-726-5 (Epub)

To my mom and dad who always believed in my ability to write, teach,and lead. Thank you for your undying love and support.

To Dr Sharon Daloz Parks – for your mentorship, guidance, and leadership.

There are no words to express my gratitude for you and your life’s work.– Linnette R. L. Werner

To every student that allowed me to walk with them for a short time on their journey. Thank you for your work, your challenge, your trust and your

connection. Thank you for your grace in allowing me to grow as fast as I could, even if it wasn’t as fast as you wanted me to.

To my partner Susan and my children Gracey, Hank and Sam. You will always be my first circle. Almost all of the big lessons I learned from you.

– David Hellstrom

This page intentionally left blank

vii

CONTENTS

List of Tables and Figures xi

List of Abbreviations xiii

About the Authors xv

Acknowledgments xvii

Introduction 1

1. Intentional Emergence as a Way of Teaching 3Intentional & Emergent Teaching 4Why Intentional Emergence? 5The First Part of the Model: Intentional 6

Becoming Conscious of the Invisible Fields that Shape Behavior 6How Intention Shows Up in the Classroom 8Unlearning: Protecting Competencies 9

The Second Part of the Model: Emergence 11Using Lived Moments, in the Moment 11How “Emergence” Shows Up in the Classroom 12

The IE Teaching and Learning Model 13Adding Identity as a Core Factor to the Learning 15

Students Bring Identity with Them into the Space 17Instructors Bring Identity into the Space as Well 18

Transforming the Classroom into a Community 19So Let’s Begin... 20

2. Understand Your Intentions, Identities, and Triggers 21Setting Intentions 21Plan Like Hell...Then Let It Go 22Unexplored Intentions Allow Defaults to Enter 25Identities Matter 26

Our Intentions and Identities Are Linked 26Getting Help with Your Defaults 27

vii i Contents

Know Your Triggers 28Make Intentional Choices 28

3. Build a Container 31What Is a Container? 35Practices for Building the Container 35Know Your Students’ Names Before They Arrive 35

Begin On-time and with Intention 36Prepare the Whiteboard as a Welcoming Tool 37How You Create the Container Will Carry Through 39

4. Use TASCs 41Purpose of TASCs 41Types of TASCs 44

Real Work TASCs 45Adapted TASCs 45

Framing a TASC for Optimum Emerging Moments 45Get the Instructions Right 46Don’t Prevaricate 46Think About Obstacles for the Leader to Navigate 47The Time Limit Matters 47Allow for “Timeouts” to Think Strategically and Access Resources 48Remember It Is a Group TASC Ultimately 48

Facilitating a TASC 49The Dangers and Opportunities of Using TASCs 50

5. Give the Work Back 53Find the Natural Places to Give the Work Back 55Putting Themselves into Groups 56

Facilitating Reading Discussions or Other Activities 56Processes Related to Community Building 58Just Be Quiet: Don’t Answer All the Questions That Are Asked 58Decide if the Questions Are Individual or Community Worthy 60

Cautions to Notice 60

6. See the Moments 65We Don’t Normally See Emergent Moments – Until We Do 65Types of Emergent Moments to Start Seeing 66

Notice When You Experience High Levels of Tension or Emotion 66Learn to Hear Big Assumptions and Sweeping Statements 67Notice the Energy in the Room 67Notice the Things You Talk About After Class 67

ixContents

Practice Seeing Moments and Getting More Data in the Room 68Replay the Class in Your Head 68Record Your Class 69Ask Others to Observe Your Class 69Observe Others 70

7. Notice Compassionately 73The Difference Between Noticing and Compassionate Noticing 73Practices for Noticing Compassionately 76

Don’t Go for Perfection, Allow Re-dos 76When Starting Out, Err on the Side of Compassion 77After the First Thought, Do a Compassion Check 77Soften the Noticing with a Preamble 78Notice When Students Take on New or Challenging Things 79Work Hard to Keep Your Curiosity 79

Begin to Teach the Class to Start Noticing as Well 80Use Language Authentic to You 80Ask Yourself, “To What End?” 81

8. Regulate the Heat 83Things to Remember When Turning Up the Heat 85

Stay Calm and See the Larger System 85Remember Your Role and Also Be a Human Being 86Know Where Your Class Is 87Make the Tension Productive 88

Ways to Turn Up the Heat 89Use Natural Class Occurrences 89Give the Work Back to the Class 90Facilitate Discussions Differently 90

Allowing and Managing Conflict to Orchestrate the Heat 93Ways to Turn Down the Heat Without Losing It 94Take a Short Pause 94Make the Situation into a Case Study 95

Move It to the System Level 95Offer a Hypothetical “What if I did this?” Scenario 96

9. Offer Challenge with Support 99Practices for Offering Challenge with Support 101

Which One Are You? (You Might Be Wrong) 101Hopes Versus Expectations 102

x Contents

You Will Need to Decide How You Feel About Fairness Versus Equity 103It Is Important to Challenge and Support Factions 105

Challenge and Support Outside the Classroom 106Maximizing Time – Another Form of Challenge 108

10. See the Limitations & Dangers 111Where do I Begin? 111Where do I Begin? 112Where do I Begin? 113Where do I Begin? 113Dangers That Should Stop You 114Cautions and Words-to-the-Wise 114

You Cannot Control What Happens 114You Ask for Their Honesty ... and Sometimes You Get It 115You Will Disappoint People and Make Public Mistakes – A Lot of Them 115You Must Bring Your Own Vulnerability, But Not Be a Hot Mess 116You Will Need a Community to Support and Teach You 118This Will Take More Time Per Week Than You Knew You Had 118You Must Work, Work, Work, Work, Work on Your Ego 119

11. Take the Next Steps 121Find Your People 122Plan Like Hell and Let It Go, but Don’t Skip the “Plan Like Hell Part” 123Start, Then Start Again 123

References 125

Index 127

xi

L IST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

TABLES

Table 1. T-test Results for IE Student Versus Non-IE Student Outcomes. 16Table 2. Dangers and Opportunities of Using TASCs. 50

FIGURES

Fig. 1. The Intersection of Intention and Emergence. 5Fig. 2. Examples of Planning Sources Which Create the Intentional

Foundation. 10Fig. 3. Examples of Sources for Emergent Moments. 14Fig. 4. Not All Optimal or Teachable Moments Can or Should be

Engaged. 15Fig. 5. How Instructor/Student Identity Connects to Intention and

Emergence. 17Fig. 6. The IE Teaching and Learning Model. 19Fig. 7. Whiteboard Content on the First Day. 32Fig. 8. White Board Content Third Week of Class. 38Fig. 9. Hope Versus Expectations. 102Photo 1. Challenge and Support. 109

This page intentionally left blank

xii i

L IST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CIP Case-in-pointCRLL Culturally Relevant Leadership LearningIE Intentional EmergenceILA International Leadership AssociationTASC Temporary Authority Skills Challenge

This page intentionally left blank

xv

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Linnette R. L. Werner, PhD, spent many years as the Director of the Under-graduate Leadership Minor at the University of Minnesota. She started work-ing with the Leadership Minor in 2001, when she was asked to join the teaching faculty of the newly created program. With a background in educa-tional policy and administration, teaching, the arts, and leadership, Linnette worked with the minor to align its curriculum to the civic engagement mission of the University of Minnesota, increase its capacity, provide instructor men-toring, and begin research initiatives.

Starting with a total of 251 students per year in two sections of the intro-ductory course and one section of each of the upper core courses, Linnette increased its capacity to serve over 1,800 undergraduates per year, making it the largest program of its kind in the world. In 2019, she left the University of Minnesota to serve as the Associate Dean at Hamline University and to create new academic leadership programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels.

David Hellstrom, MA, is a well-loved national leadership trainer and speaker, having been the keynote speaker at more than 350 colleges and universities in the last two decades on leadership and self-development. David’s efforts have brought him an Omni Education Award, an appearance on the TODAY™ Show with Katie Couric, and many accolades. Both as a speaker and as a teacher of leadership, David’s audiences and classes describe him as funny, curious, engaging, and truly passionate about what leadership means and how it can be taught.

David began teaching in the Leadership Minor at the University of Min-nesota in 2002. In 2007, Linnette and David, under the care and mentorship of Dr Sharon Daloz Parks, began to adapt the work of Heifetz and his col-leagues at Harvard to be equally effective with undergraduates and emerging-adults. Based on programmatic research and evaluation, the adaptation has been extremely successful.

This page intentionally left blank

xvii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the many talented and compassionate teachers and leaders who helped to make this work a tangible product. First and foremost, we are indebted to Sharon Daloz Parks who not only helped us to adapt case-in-point to our context, but who also told us it was time to write and mentored us in the process. We are also grateful to Ron Heifetz not only for his encouragement and feedback along the way, but also for his pioneering work in Adaptive Leadership and case-in-point teaching. In addition, Alex Fink, a talented teacher, leader, and scholar, spent many hours with us imaging the structure of the book, its tone, and the out-line. Although Alex’s words do not appear in the text, his vision and heart guided us.

We’d like to thank Emerald Publishing and our amazing editor, Kim Chad-wick – thank you for your belief in us and your feedback. We would also like to acknowledge those who graciously reviewed, again and again, work that needed to be codified, but which will always be in progress: Ethan Brownell, Gracey Hellstrom, Anna Capeder, Zachary Carter, Jessica Chung, Kate Kes-senich, Christine VeLure Roholt, Betsy Priem, Marcus Carrigan, Nick Mabee, Parker Mullins, Laura Shelley, June Nobbe, Brian Fredrickson, Jason Jackson, Leonard Taylor, and Evonne Billotta-Burke.

A huge thank you also goes out to Annika Brelsford who created the visu-als in the book. Thank you for taking our ideas and working to bring them from messy ideas in our heads to clear pictures for others.

We would also like to express our deepest gratitude to all of our Lead-ership Minor instructors and colleagues (both at the University of Minne-sota and Hamline University). Without this talented, courageous, authentic group of leader-teachers, we wouldn’t have had the audacity to say, “this stuff works.” The number of hours of collective creativity, adaptation and failed experiments (that eventually led to a proven, solid foundation) that went into this model were only possible because of these courageous people. It’s truly miraculous that we get to work with them every day.

xvii i Acknowledgments

Finally, none of this would be possible without our students. We hope the importance of that statement connects with those who read this book. We are the teachers we are because our students are the students they are. Ubuntu: I am because we are. Thank you for being. Thank you for showing up and giv-ing us your trust and allowing us to practice our craft. Thank you for making us better people and leaders in the process.

1

INTRODUCTION

Micro-aggressions, complex identities, polarized belief systems, pandemic interruptions – these are just a few of the things teachers and faculty are deal-ing with. The days of the sage on the stage or the stand and deliver model are over (even when we might temporarily need to record a few lectures while we implement socially-distanced teaching). And yet, how are teachers, facilitators and professors supposed to adapt to such a quickly evolving “classroom” and provide transformative content?

What if we could work with what emerges in the moment instead of seeing it as unplanned experiences and disruptions? It could significantly address the “theory to practice bridge” many leadership students face when they leave our classrooms/trainings/experiences. No matter how captivating a professor, facilitator, or teacher is, when people face stressful challenges in new contexts beyond the classroom, leadership theory is often forgotten. In fact, leadership teachers and facilitators struggle to model the integration of theory and prac-tice even in their own leadership classrooms – being caught off guard when something happens that wasn’t on the lesson plan for the day.

This book is about teaching in a brand-new way. Teaching from the emerg-ing now, or Intentional Emergence, turns the space into a living leadership laboratory that helps students practice and refines their skills while support-ing instructors in modeling effective leadership practices. In the way that sci-entists have laboratories, lawyers have mock trials, and teachers have student teaching, this model gives emerging leaders a way to hone their skills through purposeful and productively stressful situations.

Teaching from the emerging now explores how we combine structure with freedom, planning with letting go, and intention with emergence to create inclusive, dynamic classrooms – whether we are teaching Leadership, Social Justice, or other applied subjects. The Intentional Emergence approach to teaching and learning takes the fear out of being surprised, provides concrete ways to both support and challenge students, and reimagines the classroom as a living leadership laboratory. Beyond bridging theory to practice, by rethink-ing the classroom from a place to impart knowledge to a shared space of

2 Teaching from the Emerging Now

co-creation, faculty, teachers, and trainers are better able to meet the increas-ingly diverse needs of learners for differentiation, connection, and Inclusion.

Intentional Emergence comes from a decade of research that started with asking the question, How can we better prepare students for real world lead-ership challenges while at the same time build inclusive classrooms that are able to respond to today’s complex learner needs? What we found is students want teachers and facilitators who can both plan and let go of the plan, chal-lenge and support at the same time, and identify emergent curriculum that matches the world they see outside the classroom. Intentional Emergence has been proven to help students feel more engaged with the learning community and ultimately more prepared to face future leadership challenges. It is our belief, and one we share with you, that this type of engagement not only helps our students become better learners and leaders, but ultimately helps the world that they will all too soon be shaping in new, critical and exciting ways.

The last thing we want to offer to you as an introduction to this book is that Intentional Emergence was started by teachers like you – teachers who were looking for a different way of doing things; teachers who felt the hun-ger in their students who wanted education to be more connected to their own identities and lived experiences; teachers who themselves wanted their teaching to be more: more authentic, more passionate, more communal, more relevant to the world we are living in and as importantly, the world we are trying to create.

Perhaps you are also a teacher (or someone who cares about one) who is looking for something a little more as well. We hope this book is a good place to start.

3

1

INTENTIONAL EMERGENCE AS A WAY OF TEACHING

It’s the third week of class and the students have been getting to know each other. By now, the instructor expects the students to know and use each oth-er’s names. But today, the instructor calls on someone and uses the wrong name. A different student corrects the instructor. This is further complicated because the instructor is white, but has called on a student of color by the name of another student of color in the class. The instructor freezes, their mind racing, “What do I do now?”

In a different room on campus and about halfway through the year and the instructor has been thinking about how well this semester has been going and how engaged the current class is. The instructor has been talking about strength theory and has reminded the class that each person is unique and brings their own strengths and styles into the space; knowing those things about each other will help in their group projects and other collaboration work. One student remarks “It isn’t just our strengths and skills that define us, but our stories as well.” This comment gets some energy in the class and soon people are talking about how their own experiences, their own identi-ties, perhaps even their own traumas are as much part of what they bring to the world as their achievements. The instructor agrees. Another student responds “Maybe every class one or two students could just talk for a minute or so about the things in their life that they believe most define them.” That is followed up by someone who comments,

I don’t think I could really tell you much about myself in a minute. Some of you know that I am an assault survivor and to know me is to know that story. Maybe we could all take the time to really authentically tell our own stories to each other.

4 Teaching from the Emerging Now

The instructor sees many nods and hears murmurs of support, but also sees one student who has the look of sheer terror on their face. Someone asks the instructor “Can we do that?” The instructor can only think “What do I do now?”

In a digital space on campus later that year, an instructor who teaches a once-a-week summer class is watching the class chat blow up over the murder of another unarmed person of color by a police officer. Several students have been voicing strong opinions about what they are seeing. Some students are texting the class about participating in the protests and inviting classmates to join. One student remarks about how they have so many thoughts and feelings regarding what is occurring and they can’t wait to come to class later in the week to talk about it as a group. That message is followed by another student who types “I don’t think our academic class is the best place for per-sonal agendas.” The response to that is “this is why another unarmed person of color is dead.” Soon after another student sends the message that “everyone should calm down and wait for the instructor to respond.” The instructor reads that message and thinks to themself “what do I do now?”

It isn’t surprising that each of these stories ends with the question “what do I do now?” Teachers know that every year, every term, every class brings its own set of complicated, challenging and potentially transformational moments and questions. On top of that, old ways of being in a classroom together are changing at a rate that many people find disorienting. But what if you could teach in a way that welcomed the unknown, that thrived when differences were front and center? What if the classroom (whether a physical space or a virtual one) could be a living laboratory for the concepts of lead-ership itself? What if you could learn to work with whatever emerged in the moment to connect it to the deeper purpose of the lesson and the class?

It’s not only possible, it might be one of the best things we can do for edu-cation and for our students right now.

INTENTIONAL & EMERGENT TEACHING

There are different kinds of things that emerge – some we can predict might happen because we have faced them in the past and others that are surprises such as the examples given above. Either way, what we know for sure is that (a) there are things we want students to walk away with and (b) there will be things that seem to get in the way of achieving these outcomes. Until now, many of us have looked at these things as diametrically opposed. But what if we could see them in a different light – more like a Venn diagram and less

5Intentional Emergence as a Way of Teaching

like a spectrum, where our intention for the class has some overlap with what emerges spontaneously? (Fig. 1)

WHY INTENTIONAL EMERGENCE?

The context of the classroom is already emergent, meaning it is dynamic and continuously unfolding as the class progresses. As students and instructors ask questions, process concepts, and practice leadership, the environment of the classroom is constantly changing. This is not unlike other contexts outside of the classroom. In any given organization, personal actions (e.g., words used in a meeting, a new person being hired, or a new policy) can dramatically alter the environment and culture of the organization. The challenge is to recognize these changes as they occur and to respond in an intentional and effective manner.

Let’s revisit the first example, an instructor calling a student by the wrong name. The instructor has the opportunity, with their intentions for the day in mind, to respond to the emergent context of the classroom rather than to continue with the plan they had to begin with. The emergent context has provided a more authentic lived-experience for the class to use as a bridge for theory to practice than the instructor most likely developed on their own. The instructor may ask

What is the phenomenon at play here? Why do our brains not see differences at this point in the semester? Do all of us not see the difference? Just some of us? Why is this important to what we are learning?

Fig. 1. The Intersection of Intention and Emergence.

6 Teaching from the Emerging Now

What would occur if nothing happens in regards to this example – if the “wrong name” moment was just allowed to pass and class went on? There could be loss, a missed opportunity to teach, a lack of surfacing a potentially deeper marginalization. What often happens is that the instructor gets paralyzed by the emerging moment – especially if it is controversial. Then the moment passes because we choose to look away from what is happening right in front of us.

As a reader, you might be asking why a teacher would risk making students feel awkward, defensive, or invite (rather than resolve) any sort of conflict. Because the dynamics of marginalization and oppression, the operations of conflict and power, the intersections of individual and community visions are happening all the time in our workplaces, organizations, governments, and communities, whether we call them out or not. Working with them is leader-ship. Working with emergent events within the classroom prepares us for the world we will ask our students to soon lead.

At its core, this approach to teaching relies on balancing the needs of clear-ly identified intentions and working with what emerges to best teach to the outcomes of the course.

THE FIRST PART OF THE MODEL: INTENTIONAL

Becoming Conscious of the Invisible Fields that Shape Behavior

Intention is becoming an increasingly important conversation across tradition-al sciences as well as in leadership education. In quantum physics, intention is akin to the observer-effect and is the interaction between the researcher’s will and the particle’s behavior as can be seen in the famous “Double Slit” experiments (Buks, Schuster, Heiblum, Mahalu, & Umansky, 1998). In biol-ogy, intention (as we are using it) is similar to “field theory,” the theory that unseen influences, or fields, affect behavior. We relate to the idea of intention the way that Margaret Wheatley (2006) approaches the idea of invisible fields that shape behavior. In her book, Leadership and the New Science: Discover-ing Order in a Chaotic World, Wheatley states that invisible influences such as having a clearly defined vision for an organization changes the direction of the organization. She goes on to caution,

We have believed that the clearer the image of the destination, the more force the future would exert on the present, pulling us to that desired state. It’s a very strong Newtonian image, much like the old view of gravity. But what if we changed the science and looked at vision as a field? (p. 55)

7Intentional Emergence as a Way of Teaching

Wheatley offers some powerful ideas about how we teach. First, it’s time to move from a “my will over yours” method of teaching into a collaborative method where the instructor sets a course, but isn’t the destination in itself. Intention helps us to let go of thinking of the final destination so that we are able to nurture and support moments of transformation not only at the individual level, but at the system level as well. In other words, our intention affects what emerges, and what emerges allows us to bridge the gap between what is and what could be.

Wheatly also surfaces the need for authenticity when trying to work with invisible influences. She says,

This field metaphor would help us understand that we need congruency in the air, visionary messages matched by visionary behaviors. [...]We would become an organization of integrity, where our words would be seen and not just heard. (p. 56)

We use the word authenticity within our programs to get to the deeper idea that we are here to be models of effective leadership, to be authentically our-selves (our best selves) in the face of ambiguity. Some case-in-point (CIP) approaches disagree with this idea – that there is a separation between self and role that condones inauthentic behavior, if that inauthentic behavior is what is called for. For example, we have seen a CIP instructor enter a room of strangers who thought they were attending a lecture, turn away from the audience, face the wall and refuse to speak. When people became uncom-fortable and conflict arose around what was happening, the CIP instructor asked high-heat questions (such as “why do you feel a need for me to run this class?”) until the CIP session was over and the debrief took place. Even after the debrief, many people left the room confused about the inauthentic behavior and even more confused about how CIP could be used effectively in their own contexts.

We have too many examples in our world where this interpretation of separation of role and self has led to inhumane action and too few where it has led to transformational growth to support its use within our own program. We believe that when Ron Heifetz (the originator of CIP) speaks of separation between role and self, he is not condoning detachment, but instead asking us to consider that when people attack us, they often don’t know us, only our roles, and are therefore attacking our roles, not us as people. An intentional and emergent approach to teaching doesn’t condone inauthentic behavior – it asks us to be more authentic, more in touch with our humanity as we see the innocence in others who are suffering and lash-ing out.

8 Teaching from the Emerging Now

How Intention Shows Up in the Classroom

If we accept the premise that invisible forces affect behavior, then how can we use this understanding to teach more effectively? This question led us to a collision of both the simplest and most profound thoughts about teaching. If we were going to look at how intention shows up in the classroom, we first needed to spend some time re-imagining what the classroom is intended to be and stop relying on unconscious systems that started the current classroom model in the first place.

This was our simple thought: What does the classroom represent? Heifetz likens the classroom itself to a “container1” which was a helpful first place to begin (Heifetz, 1998; Heifetz & Linsky 2002, Parks, 2005). But what is inside that container? The obvious answer is students. But the less obvious answer is whatever truly is in that classroom:

• the norms for how education is supposed to work;

• the expectations of what knowledge is (or achievement, or for that matter, leadership);

• the unconscious archetypes and roles of teacher and student (or authority and power);

• student and teacher identities with their accompanying power imbalances; and

• the hunger that signing up for a course on leadership in the first place represents, etc.

And, when we looked even more deeply, to our utter sadness, we found something else inside the classroom. We found unexamined resignation, that students had already given up on the possibility that what would take place here would be meaningful and relevant to their lives, let alone transforma-tional to who they were as human spirits.

David has often made the comment that education is the only billion- dollar industry in the world where the customer has to adapt and conform to the company providing the service. Why do students talk about that “one teacher” they had in grade school or that “one class they took in high school” with such fondness? Not just because they were wonderful experiences, but also because they were the rare experiences. The reason these “one class expe-riences” stand out is because many of the other ones do not – the others were, for the most part, transactional experiences involving the (temporary) transfer of information. What if students want meaningful, vibrant, transformational learning and are willing to engage in that learning even if it is different and