teaching methods related to student progress in lower-level stem courses steve benton, ph.d. senior...
TRANSCRIPT
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses
Steve Benton, Ph.D.Senior Research OfficerIDEAEmeritus Professor, Kansas State [email protected]
Role of student ratings IDEA systemDescription of sampleLearning outcomes in STEM classesTeaching styles/methods in STEM classes
Student motivation in STEM classes
Session Overview
Measuring Teaching Eff ectiveness: Include Multiple forms of Assessment
Instructional Delivery
Instructional
Assessment
Course Manageme
nt
Content Expertise
Instructional Design
Learning Outcomes
BalancedPlan for SummativeEvaluation
Measuring Teaching Eff ectiveness: Include Multiple Feedback Sources
Instructional Delivery
(Students)
Instructional Assessment
(Peers)
Course Management(Administrato
r)Content
Expertise(Peers)
Instructional Design(Peers)
Learning Outcomes (Students,
Peers)
BalancedPlan for SummativeEvaluation
Purpose of IDEA
IndividualDevelopmentEducationalAssessment
Teaching ImprovementFaculty Evaluation
Curriculum ReviewProgram AssessmentAccreditation
Underlying Philosophy of IDEA
Teaching effectiveness is determined primarily by students’ progress on the types of learning the instructor targets.
Learning Objective Category
Item Number
Basic Cognitive Background
1, 2
Applications of Learning 3, 4
Expressiveness 6, 8
Intellectual Development 7, 10, 11
Lifelong Learning 9, 12
Team Skills 5
Teaching Style Category Item Number
Stimulating Student Interest
4, 8, 13, 15
Fostering Student Collaboration
5, 16, 18
Establishing Rapport 1, 2, 7, 20
Encouraging Student Involvement
9, 11, 14,19
Structuring Classroom Experiences
3, 6, 10, 12, 17
Classes using IDEA in academic years 2009-2013
STEM Classes - 171,306 Science – 82,200 Computer science – 21,188 Engineering – 12,444 Math – 55,474
Non-STEM Classes – 810,277
Description of Sample
Which learning objectives do faculty select in lower-level (first-year/sophomore) STEM courses?
THINK-PAIR-SHARE
On which learning objectives do students in lower-level STEM courses report the most progress?
THINK-PAIR-SHARE
Which teaching styles do students observe most frequently in lower-level STEM courses?
THINK-PAIR-SHARE
Which individual teaching methods are most important in lower-level STEM courses?
Teaching Methods Associated with Student Progress on Relevant
Objectives
Used BMA to test multiple modelsOnly included classes where instructor rated objective as relevant
Compared models in first-year/sophomore STEM versus all other classes
Compared models between first-year/sophomore STEM general education classes versus majors
Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA)
Explained Material Clearly/Concisely
Especially important for:• Gaining factual
knowledge• Learning fundamental
principles• Developing skills (gen.
ed.)• Problem solving• Finding/using resources
(gen. ed.)• Critical thinking
Required Original/Creative Thinking
Especially important for:• Problem solving• Finding and using
resources
“Explained course material clearly and concisely” Objectives 1, 2, 3, 11 (knowledge, problem solving,
critical thinking)“Found ways to help students answer their own
questions” Objective 4 (professional skills/competencies)
“Inspired students to set and achieve challenging goals” Objective 11 (critical thinking)
“Asked students to share ideas and experiences” Objective 9 (information literacy)
“Gave projects, tests, or assignments that required original or creative thinking” Objectives 3, 9 (problem solving, information literacy)
Key Teaching Methods in Lower-Level STEM Courses
Especially important for gen. ed. students in:
Acquiring an interest in learning more
Stimulated Students to Intellectual Effort
What percent of lower-level students express a strong desire to take their current STEM course?
Students’ Desire to Take the Course
STEM instructors emphasize basic cognitive information and applications of knowledge
Least emphasis on team skills, expressiveness, intellectual development
Summary: Learning Outcomes Emphasized in Lower-level STEM
Courses
Student progress highest in basic cognitive information/applications
Student progress lowest in expressiveness and intellectual development
Summary: Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses
Frequent STEM teaching styles: stimulating interest, establishing rapport, and establishing course structure
Least frequent STEM teaching style: fostering collaboration
Key teaching method: Clarity and conciseness
Summary: Teaching Methods in Lower-level STEM Courses
STEM students’ desire to take course comparable to non-STEM
Students’ desire to take course lowest in math
Summary: Student Motivation in Lower-level STEM Courses
• Which results confi rmed what you might think • about STEM courses?• Which results were surprising?• What additional insights or questions • do you have?
Discussion