team: wolfgang burkert, haimo jöhri, uwe barth

17
Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth Mechanical precision and vibration behavior of mechanical supports Johan Wickström GFA-ATK

Upload: quanda

Post on 21-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mechanical precision and vibration behavior of mechanical supports. Johan Wickström GFA-ATK. Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth. PSI XFEL LAYOUT. BRIDGE. AARE. SETUP of Mechanical structures 250 MeV. COMPONETS. SUPPORTS. GIRDER. JACKS. FLOOR. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

Mechanical precision and vibration behavior of mechanical supports

Johan Wickström GFA-ATK

Page 2: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 2

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

BRIDGE

AARE

PSI XFEL LAYOUT

Page 3: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 3

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

GIRDER

JACKS

FLOOR

SUPPORTS

COMPONETS

SETUP of Mechanical structures 250 MeV

Page 4: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 4

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

GIRDER

JACKS

FLOOR

SUPPORTS

COMPONETS

floor unlevel +-10mm

pre positioning +-1mm

machined precision longitudinal 0.01mm/1mvertical +-0.1mm

precision from alignment driving wedge or distance block 0.01mm

stability of component structure

SETUP of Mechanical structures General

Page 5: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 5

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

4700mm

820mm/ 920mm

1200mm

570mm

820mm

mass 3800kg /4400kg

Girder Dimension 250 MeV

Page 6: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 6

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute SwitzerlandW.Burkert

Page 7: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 7

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Girder Dimension Fabrication

Page 8: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 8

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Spherical contact head•Vertical adjustment•Horizontal adjustment1 turn = 0.3mm

• Standard driving wedge•Compact and massive design•Fixation of movement possible

Girder Jack

J.Haimo

Page 9: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 9

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Reference area

Clamping element

Distance block orDriving wedge

Screw for lifting

J.Haimo

Support for Components

Page 10: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 10

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Height: 20mm +/- 0.5mm

1 turn = 0.1mm adjustment of height

Scale : 0.1mm / mark

Scale : 0.01mm / mark

Footprint : 38 x 65mm

J.Haimo

Driving Wedge

Page 11: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 11

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Lifting Spreader 7.5 tons

Page 12: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 12

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Why mineral Cast ? – high damping properties expected, non homogenous material– relatively high mass vs. load change good for many setups

– cost effective in mass production (no high temperature) about 3 weeks delivery with existing mould

• one wooden mould gives ~10 girders• one steel mould gives +100 girders

– surfaces can be grinded >> precision 0.01mm/1m length– no local stresses introduces by machining

WEAK Points– fragile edges - corners– minimal wall thickens +80mm– mould costs during prototyping– unknown factors?

design Today 250 MeV – PSI XFEL

Page 13: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 13

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

– estimate eigenfrequency and deformations of girder – 3 feet or 4 feet solution considered– several feet locations considered– target eigenfrequency above 40 Hz– sacking deformation of low relevance since machining done on

support points– sacking from 10-20μm

Eigenfrequency analysis of mechanical supports

Page 14: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 14

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

Modus Frequenz [Hz]

1 58

2 102

3 112

4 140

5 171

6 191

• 3 Feet downstream + Load

Eigenfrequency analysis of mechanical supports

Page 15: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 15

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

• 4 Feet downstream + LOAD

Optimal Feet DistributionFirst mode 128 Hz

Modus Frequenz [Hz]

1 102

2 117

3 135

4 155

5 190

6 190

Eigenfrequency analysis of mechanical supports

Page 16: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 16

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

analysis Summary– Deformation not important can be machined out– Clearly 4 feet more stable and symmetric behavior– Component support also need optimizing– Feet location important– Lifting feet dose only bring advantage if beam lower down– Real measurements will prove how the complete setup will

perform

Eigenfrequency analysis of mechanical supports

Page 17: Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth

27.01.09 17

27.01.09

Johan.Wickström GFA-ATK, Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland

• Development of mechanical supports is well underway, during the spring we will have a confirmation of the mineral cast material for the functionality as a girder. As well as the functionality of the jacks, supports and the alignment wedges.

• FEM eigenfrequency calculations should be done for the complete chain of mechanical supports + possible confirmation by measurement - magnets, RF structures, diagnostics, undulators, laser transfer, etc

• For PSI-XFEL – check beam distance to supports, beam height, floor trench for girder, 3 – 4 feet, feet location handling and transport questions - time and tooling, tunnel size

• Further comparison to other potential material like SiC should be carried out, possibly in scaled down size

Thanks to All the great colleges that work together for this interesting and challenging development!

Summary