tech leaders

Upload: cesar-rivero

Post on 03-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Tech Leaders

    1/3

    TechnicalLeaders

    The purpose of this article is to address

    three common myths/misperceptions

    the general public has of the petroleum

    industry. Two oil and gas industry

    technical experts give their views

    regarding these common myths/

    misperceptions and the factors associated

    with them.

    Myth #1: Theres plenty of oil and gas

    available, but the oil and gas industry

    is not making an effort to produce

    enough for world consumption or the

    industry fails to supply enough to

    the market.

    Questions:If oil and gas resources

    are so abundant, why are pr ices so

    high? What is keeping more supply from

    being available?

    AE: Statistics show that our industry

    has produced significant amounts of oil

    since the start of the modern oil industry

    and there are stil l more reserves to

    be produced. On the one hand, our

    industry has been mostly successful in

    replacing produced reserves over the

    last many years. On the other hand, the

    cost of producing those reserves and

    problems associated with delivering

    petroleum products to markets

    are increasing.

    The petroleum industry is

    characterized by two important,

    somewhat unique features: high risk and

    uncertainty, and significant investment.

    Many people argue that the easy oil

    has long gone and we are left with

    more difficult-to-produce oil and gas.

    Through nurturing our people, using

    advanced processes, and expanding

    our technology port folio, we have

    been able to produce commercially

    from the Arctic, shale gas and shale

    oil, deep water and ultradeep water,

    heavy oil and tight oil, and so on. The

    production of the more difficult oil and

    gas requires the use of more expensive

    methods and technologies, yet oil and

    gas production is still cheaper than most

    alternative energies and even probably

    safer and more environmentally friendly

    than some.

    The oil industry is a technologically

    advanced industry that develops and

    employs high technology and borrows

    technologies from other industries as

    well. Although many factors impact

    oil prices and can drive them higher,

    the cost of finding, developing, and

    producing reserves is proportional

    to the complexity of producing those

    reserves. Many of our projects take

    significant time and assets to drive

    oil and gas and their products to our

    markets. Therefore, the combination

    of costs, need for technology, political

    stability in certain areas, and time

    required in developing reserves

    to market affects both the supply of

    petroleum and oil prices.

    GT:The current oil price is a result

    of two main drivers. One is the

    demand for oil as the fuel of choice for

    transportation. While the future may

    bring other modes of transportation

    that do not rely on oil, for now, growth

    of the world economy means increasing

    demand for oil.

    The second driver is the shift in

    who owns the oil. Over the last 30 years

    the majority of the worlds oil reserves

    have moved from corporate to national

    ownership. National oil companies

    (NOCs) now hold more than 75% of

    the worlds reserves. State-owned

    companies have more objectives than

    simply making a profit. They are often

    an agent of government policy and

    make decisions to maintain h igher

    prices by li miting production.

    In fact, over the last 30 years as

    ownership and production have shifted

    from publically owned companies to

    NOCs, the price of oil has risen from

    USD 20/bbl (in 2006 dollars) to as high

    as more than USD 100/bbl. We can

    better see that impact by comparing

    oil prices to natural gas prices. Natural

    Oil and Gas Professionals Perspectives

    on Common Public Perceptions of

    the IndustryAhmed El-Banbi,Cairo University;Geoffrey Thyne,Science Based Solutions

    Ahmed El-Banbiis a professor of petroleum engineering atCairo University. With 21 years diversified international

    experience in reservoir and petroleum engineering, El-

    Banbi spent 12 years with Schlumberger where he held a

    variety of technical and manageria l positions in five

    countries. He has considerable experience in managing

    multidisciplinary teams and performing integrated reservoir

    studies. Previously, he held shorter assignments with a major

    oil company and a consulting company, in addit ion to academic research and

    teaching. El-Banbi has authored or coauthored more than 40 techn ical papers and

    two book chapters. He has served on numerous SPE committees and as a technical

    reviewer for SPE Reservoir Engineering & Evaluationjournal.

  • 8/12/2019 Tech Leaders

    2/3

    2Vol. 9 // No. 2 // 2013

    gas prices are, and continue to be,

    very low because of the large supplies

    and rapidly growing production

    from unconventional resources. Is it

    coincidence that those new reserves

    are not controlled by national

    oil companies?

    We have large supplies of oil and

    gas available, but recovering these

    supplies is dependent on several

    factors. While the price, and thus

    profit, may be attractive to the industry,

    the limitations imposed by NOCs as

    representatives of their governments

    policies ca n be prohibit ive.

    We are also encountering limitations

    imposed by current technology.

    Supplies of easily extracted oil and

    gas are declin ing. We are facing

    ever-growing technical challenges

    to continue production of leaner

    resources. For instance, conventional

    resources are fairly energy-dense.

    We find ourselves having to develop

    less energy-rich resources such as

    shale gas. Unconventional resources

    require technological innovations,

    more intensive drilling densities, and

    additional stimulation techniques such

    as hydraulic fractur ing to produce.

    Myth #2:Oil is very easy to producesince it exists in a pool underground

    and you only have to drill a well

    and the oil will keep gushing out of

    the ground.

    Questions:Why should oil and gas

    companies enjoy subsidies when they are

    so profitable? What factors impact oil and

    gas prices?

    AE: Oil exists in pore spaces and

    usually in deep reservoirs below the

    surface of the Earth. In many cases,

    it requires a significant expense to

    dril l wells and reach the petroleum

    reservoirs. Also, a fter some depletion

    of the reservoir, we usually need to

    install a rtificial-lift equipment ( pumps

    or gas lift) to help lift the oil to the

    surface. We will also need to bui ld

    surface facilities to treat and process

    the oil and then transport it to refineries

    and petrochemical plants for further

    processing into products we use in

    everyday life. Al l of these processes

    require significant knowledge of the

    business and significant investment.

    Some governments encourage oil

    companies to use advanced technology

    and develop more technologies to

    produce higher-cost oil (more difficult

    oil) and therefore grant some subsidies

    for specific projects.

    There are many factors that affect oil

    and gas prices. These include the usual

    supplydemand rules that govern most

    commodities. However, because oil and

    gas are so tied to our lives, and because

    there is always fear of disruption of oil or

    gas (or their products) supply at certain

    times, prices may be af fected by other

    factors. These factors include political

    stability, storage capacity and stock

    amounts, Organization of the Petroleum

    Exporting Countries and high-

    production countries interference in the

    market, accidents, weather conditions,

    and public perception.

    GT:The actual profit margin of oil and

    gas companies is fairly average (4%

    8%) compared to many other industries.

    However, since the energy industry is

    the largest business on the planet, the

    absolute profit value seems huge. That

    said, the energy industry does enjoy

    a number of tax incentives that may or

    may not be necessary. This is a political

    question since there are national

    security issues involved in maintaining

    a secure energy supply.

    First, it is important to recognize

    that the oil and gas market is a world

    market. Few countries are self-sufficient

    when it comes to energy. And second,

    while most of us think of oil and gas as

    commodities, they are much more.

    The reality is petroleum is a critical

    source of energy in the modern world,

    and as such is a tool of international

    power. In the free-market view,

    prices are a function of supply and

    demand; however, that ideal has

    been substantially changed by the

    rise of national oil companies. As

    producers, they have good reason to

    maximize production, which increases

    supplies and lowers prices; however,

    as instruments of their governments

    policies there are other considerations.

    World oil and gas supplies have

    become instruments of policy as much

    as commodities.

    Myth #3:Hydraulic fracturing isharmful to the environment.

    Geoffrey Thyne is a registered professional geologist

    specializing in applications of geochemistry to Earth

    systems, working since 2012 as a private consulta nt for

    Science Based Solutions in Laramie, Wyoming. He has

    served on the Scientific Advisory Board for the US

    Environmental Protection Agencys current hydraulic

    fracturing study. Early on, Thyne worked as a research

    geochemist at the Arco Oil and Gas research facility in

    Plano, Texas, turning to academia in the 1990s as an assistant professor at

    California State UniversityBakersfield in the department of physics and geology.

    He then joined the department of geology and geological engineering at the

    Colorado School of Mines, while also serv ing as project manager for the Colorado

    Energy Research Institute. He joined the Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute at the

    University of Wyoming in 2006 as a senior research scientist. The author or

    coauthor of more than 50 peer-reviewed scientific papers, Thyne was recognized

    by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists with the A.I. Levorsen

    Memorial Award in 2006. He holds a BA in chemistry and zoology from University

    of South Florida, an MS in oceanography from Texas A&M University, and a PhD in

    geology from the University of Wyoming.

  • 8/12/2019 Tech Leaders

    3/3

    TechnicalLeaders

    Questions:What are oil and gas

    companies doing to reduce harmful

    environmental impacts to air, water, land,

    and people? Why arent they doing more

    and faster? Do oil and gas have a role in a

    low-carbon future?

    AE: Hydraulic fracturing is a technology

    that uses hydraulic power to pump

    fluid, chemicals, and proppant (sand

    particles or other material) to fracture

    the rock below the Earths surface

    (reservoir layers) to create conduits of

    high permeability a nd allow more oil

    and gas to flow to the surface. Hydraulic

    fracturing technology is credited

    with adding significant reserves to

    some hydrocarbon reservoirs and

    to changing many nonprofitable

    oil and gas extraction projects to

    profitable ones.

    When eng ineered properly,

    hydraulic fractur ing operations have

    very low impact on the env ironment. In

    most locations, oil companies exercise

    high standards of safety, adhere to

    environmental constraints, and employ

    good industria l practices that reduce

    the impact on the environment to a

    minimal footprint.

    GT:Over the decades of petroleum

    extraction, the industry as a whole

    has done an enormous amount to

    balance the production of resources

    with minimal environmental

    impact. There is, and always will

    be, a dynamic tension between

    corporate profits and public good;

    however, mature corporations have

    implemented policies and practices

    that recognize this balance. This is and

    will remain a constantly moving target.Instilling and maintaining corporate

    philosophies that encourage and reward

    practices that reduce environmenta l

    impact is key.

    However, on the hydraulic

    fracturing issue, oil and gas

    companies have not been proactive

    enough in acknowledging and

    minimizing environmental impact. In

    part this is the outcome of the rapid

    deployment of an evolving technology.

    Another factor is that many

    companies involved in developing

    unconventional resources are

    relatively new to the business. In my

    experience, the larger, well-established

    corporations with long histories in

    conventional oil and gas have over

    the decades developed policies that

    balance business and environmental

    concerns. These companies have

    come to realize that minimizing

    environmental impact is simply good

    business. In contrast, many companies

    involved in developing unconventional

    resources are still climbing the

    learning curve.

    Many companies view the problem

    as political rather than technical. Their

    public relations ef forts are spent on

    propagati ng a story l ine whose premise

    is that development activities, especially

    hydraulic fracturing, are well regulated

    and have never caused environmental

    damage. Many in the industry accept

    these statements without question.

    Since this position contradicts the

    experience of many citizens, it creates

    a credibility issue with the public. The

    industrys response to questions is too

    often further denial, efforts to influence

    policy-makers, and suppression of

    opposing points of view. This has

    created an antagonistic environment

    where sensible solutions and policies

    are ignored in favor of further polarizing

    stand-offs and conflict.

    The fact is most of the problems are

    engineering and technical in nature,

    problems the oi l and gas industry can

    solve. Realistic and practical solutions

    such as green fluids, public access

    to well records and fracturing-fluid

    composition, cooperative engagement

    with the public, and forward-looking

    business practices should be our focus.

    Using oil in tra nsportation more

    efficiently and the growth of natural

    gas in electr icity generation have

    already reduced US carbon emissions

    substantial ly. In fact, the US is well on

    track to reach the Kyoto targets for its

    carbon emissions.

    Injection of CO2for enhanced

    oil recovery is a carbon-neutral

    practice that expands our domestic

    oil reserves while contributing to

    carbon management.

    However, the larger question is:

    What would we substitute for oil and

    gas? Petroleum (oil and gas) supplies

    about 60% of world energy needs.

    Energy is essential to our lifestyle and

    our economies. Growth in population,

    food production, life expectancies, and

    quality of life are all directly tied to

    energy supply. Changing to low-carbon

    energy-generation technologies and

    the accompanying infrastructure is a

    multigenerational endeavor.

    While renewable energ y sources

    will continue to grow, we have to

    confront the fundamental issues of scale

    and reliability. For instance, consider

    energy payback ratios (EPR), or how

    much energy is required to extract

    a resource compared to how much

    energy the resource creates. This

    is a life-cycle analysisthe well-to-

    wheels analysis.

    So how much energy does it take to

    extract a barrel of oil, pound of coal, or

    megawatt of electricity from a windmill?

    The EPR of coal is between 2 and 5,

    nuclear is 14 to 16, solar panels have a

    factor of 3 to 6, windmil ls have a return

    between 18 to 34 times, while the EPR

    for the best Middle Eastern wells is

    100. Coupled with the fact that we

    currently cannot effectively store the

    power generated by wi nd and solar,

    we have no real substitute for oil and

    gas in the near term. Someday there

    will be a game-changing technological

    substitute for petroleum, but until then

    petroleum remains a key player in the

    energy business. TWA

    References

    BP Statistical Review of World Energy

    2012, June 2012 www.bp.com/

    statisticalreview.

    El-Banbi, A hmed H. 2010.

    Technology and Innovation: Do

    We Do Enough in Our I ndustry?

    Paper SPE 128485 presented

    at the North Africa Technical

    Conference and Exhibition,

    Cairo, Egypt, 1417 February.