technology design team meeting notes friday june 13

9
Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Upload: moses-gibbs

Post on 19-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Technology Design Teammeeting notesFriday June 13

Page 2: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13
Page 3: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Elementary Device Selection• Rubric for individual rating• Individual scores were added – see

Rubric to the right• Small group share• Group discussion• Recommendation - iPads with

Chromebook carts

Overview of device selection process:• We are putting together a

recommendation of what we are giving kids in a digital learning era. There is no wrong decision for this – the wrong decision would be to not have a model.

• Looking at dynamic model – lease instead of purchase.

Page 4: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Secondary Device Selection• Rubric for individual rating• Individual scores were added – see

Rubric to the right• Small group share• Group discussion

Page 5: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Secondary discussion notes

Page 6: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Secondary discussion notes continued

Page 7: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Secondary discussion notes continued

Page 8: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13
Page 9: Technology Design Team meeting notes Friday June 13

Key Messages

• There is no perfect device. • We are providing essential digital access to kids and it is on its way.• Goal is to be 1:1 at grades 6 thru 12 by the fall of 2015• We eliminated the tools that were less ideal for schools and focused on the ones that best support the work of

the Academic Design Team• We are creating flexibility through a lease to own model• There will be ongoing assessment of what is the best tool for students to use• There wasn’t a predetermined decision. The group developed the recommendation themselves through

thorough discussion and their voices were heard