temple middle school end of year data review 2012-13
TRANSCRIPT
Temple Middle School
End of Year Data Review
2012-13
Strategic Goal Area I
Student Achievement
CRCT Meets/Exceeds Data6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade All Students
2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Reading 93 89 92 86 93 91 93 89
ELA 85 80 88 88 85 86 86 85
Math 71 56 86 85 70 54 76 65
Science 68 55 82 76 68 71 73 68
Social Studies
69 46 69 68 60 65 66 60
8th Writing NA NA NA NA 7171 75
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
CRCT Exceeds Data6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade All Students
2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Reading 36 28 32 16 35 27 34 24
ELA 31 19 36 32 36 27 34 26
Math 22 9 23 15 14 9 20 11
Science 17 11 39 35 16 11 24 19
Social Studies
36 15 34 35 12 15 27 22
8th Writing NA NA NA NA 1 3
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
Sub-group data%
2013 2013 Target 2012 2011
SWD Reading 64% >/= 55% 43% 43%
SWD Math 34% >/= 35% 21% 5%
SWD ELA 52% >/=50% 43% 34%
Black Math 65% >/= 68% 58% 64%
ED Math 69% >/= 70% 61% 63%
Insert data for the sub-group identified in your evaluation
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
Lexile Scores2013Score 2012 Score Target Score
8th Grade 60 62 65
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
Goal Area I Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues
• 6th Grade Met Exceeds Targets in all areas
• Progress in Math at all grade levels
• Progress in Reading at all grade levels
• Use of Blackboard Collaborate
• Lexile Levels
• White, Black, Hispanic, SWD CRCT scores
• Writing
• Improvement in providing engaging lessons
Strategic Goal Area II
Stakeholder Engagement & Loyalty
Discipline & Safety 2013 2012 2011
Discipline Referrals
448 478 359
Tribunal Referrals
3 3 14
Level III Infractions
8 3 14
Perception of Safety
FY 13 Actual FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual
Staff 97 93 91
Parents 93 80 75
Students 82 75 67
Attendance Attendance > 15 Days
FY 13 Actual
FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual
Students 9.0% 8.9% 8.8%
Attendance % FY 13 Actual
FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual
Students 95.75% 95% 94.84%
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
Stakeholder InvolvementFY 13 Actual FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual
Volunteer Hours
1640 1625 1568
Business Partners
25 13 10
StudentVolunteer Hours
1200 1300 1092
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
Extra-Curricular Sport Record Region
PlaceState
PlayoffsNotes
Softball
Golf 2 overall wins
Football 1-6 Replacing the football coach
Comp. Cheerleading
Basketball Boys 3-9Girls 1-10
Replacing the basketball coach
Wrestling
Baseball 4-6
Track Boys 3rd Girls 2nd
7 placed in state meet
Tennis
Soccer 2-6/1 tie
Fine Arts & LiterarySport Participants LGP Score or
Region placeNotes
Band Grades 7-8(40 students)
Scored II’s at LGP
Chorus Honor Chorus District Chorus
Art NA
Academic Team
Grades 6, 7, & 8
3rd Place
Literary
Communication and or Engagement Improvements
• Facebook Page has been an effective communication and engaging tool for parents and students.
• Brag Boards for student recognition has improved student engagement
• Expanded House Points has improved student engagement.• Use of House Leaders has improved student engagement.
List improvements in the area of communication or engagement for this school year
Perception DataSurvey Question FY 13 FY 12 FY 11Parent Perception of Quality (#32 parent survey) 88 80 77Student Perception of Quality (#32 student survey) 85 63 43Staff Perception of Quality (#32 staff survey) 87 78 52
Staff perception of school climate (#16 staff survey) 68 75
Staff perception of consistency (#9 staff survey) 63 69
Parent perception of consistency (#9 parent survey) 87 60
Staff perception of communication (#13 staff survey) 79 91
Parent perception of communication (#13 parent survey 87 70
Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores
Goal Area II Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues
• Improved Attendance - All students who are absent receive personal phone calls.• Parent, student, and staff perception of school quality has improved.• Parent and student perception has improved in all areas.• House Concept continues with strength.• BLIS Program success
• Continue to implement strategies for increased parent involvement.• Encourage more student involvement in extracurricular activities.• Expand BLIS program
Strategic Goal Area III
Efficient and Effective Operational Processes
Technology Improvement
• Increased student Nooks• Increased laptop mobile units x 2• All teachers have laptops
List technology improvements for this school year
Technology Data# Rooms with
Interactive Boards
# Rooms with Document Cameras
# Student Response Systems
# iPads for student use
# Nooks for student use
Computer Labs
PK
K
1
2
3
Remedial
20
Regular 23 13 25SPED 3 3
Gifted 4 4 4
Total 30 17 32 20 260 5
Facility or Physical Improvements
• Landscaping at gym entrance• Concrete sidewalk from stadium side to gym entrance• Tiger Pride sign in commons area (donated by High School)• Purchase of Boards on each grade level hall and at commons
area for student recognition
List technology improvements for this school year
Energy Management DataPeriod Classroom
InfractionsOffice Infractions Large Area
InfractionsOther Items
September Check 2
Thanksgiving Check 2
Xmas Check 2 1
February Check 1
Spring Break Check 1
End of Year Check 0
Operational Data
Survey Question FY 13 FY 12School account fund equity 68% 30%SNP lunch participation 91% 93%SNP Health Inspection Score 100 100SNP # months operating reserve .81 (12/31/12)
Goal Area III Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues
• Technology in the classrooms
• Use of Blackboard Collaborate for acceleration/tutoring
• Continuation of landscaping/facility improvements
• Teachers are more energy conscious
• Construction has begun.
• Teachers expanding their knowledge of use of the technology in their classrooms.
• Teachers integrating the use of technology in instruction with students using their technology
Strategic Goal Area IV
Continuous System & School Improvement
My Personal Professional Learning
• Harvard University School Turnaround Leaders Institute
• Working on doctoral dissertation
School Professional Learning Initiatives
• Data Wise Observations/Instructional Rounds – Gail Parmer
• CCGPS – Dr. Evans• Special Ed Instructional Strategies – Dr. Wilson• Thinking Maps – Dr. Lambert
Leadership Rubrics
Rubric Status Areas that need addressing
Visual Reporting
Almost Fully Operational
We need to consistently display more examples of student work for discussion.
Leadership Team
Fully Operational
We have begun posting the minutes from the leadership team meetings in the work room, along with the team leaders cascading the information.
School Improvement Plan
Fully Operational
We will provide more detailed field data for each action step
Professional Learning
Operational We need to provide more differentiated PL to reflect career stages and needs.
2013 CCRPI PredictionYear Score Achievement Progres
sAchievement
GapExceeding
the BarPerformance
Points
2012-13 76.0 54.4 9.1 11 .5 1
2011-12 70.6 50.9 8.7 10.5 .5 0
Put in your 2011-12 CCRPI scores and then predict your 2012-13 CCRPI scores that we will recieve in the Fall.
Under-performing personnel
Send me the final timeline for each of your selected under-performing personnel via
shared a shared Google Drive document prior to the meeting.
Goal Area IV Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues
• Leadership Team Monitoring SIP
• Teachers are prepared to be involved in Instructional Rounds/Data Wise Observations
• Teachers gained confidence in CCGPS
• Teachers made significant progress in implementing Thinking Maps
• Improvement with teachers using data to guide and differentiate instruction
• A few remaining under-performing teachers
Quality AuditUsing a 1-10 scale with 10 being the highest score, give examples and score them for
each area of this chart.
Quality examples that are positive:
Quality examples needing Improvement:
Processes
• IB Program (School-wide discipline plan) – 8
•RTI Process – 7: 7th grade implemented with consistency and effectiveness
•Data Wise Observation
•Faculty/Staff utilization of SIP
•Fidelity of IB program implementation with all teachers
•RTI Process – 6th and 8th grade implementation
Performance
•Improved instruction – 7
•Accelerated Math – 9
•Improvement in band program – 8
•Continued improvement of instruction focusing on higher order questioning
•Continuation with focus on band supporting high school band program
Quality examples that are positive:
Quality examples needing Improvement:
Service
•Office staff’s immediate acknowledgement of visitors to building - 9
• Providing clean and beautiful facility/campus – 9
•Providing information (letter/brochure) for potential families – 8•All SPED IEP/Eligibility/Transition meetings were held on time - 8
•Customer service PL for faculty and staff with quarterly evaluations
People
•Increased recognition of students – 7
•Parents of the Month for each grade level – 7
•Positive parent contacts – 7
•Cluster Nights – Math/Science/Writing
•Consistency of parent contacts with all teachers
•Increase in parent engagement (Blackboard Collaborate/House Leader Program)
Quality AuditUsing a 1-10 scale with 10 being the highest score, give examples and score them for
each area of this chart.
Key Areas to Improve for Next Year
• School-wide writing process• Reading comprehension/fluency/developing
close reading skills• Math • School-wide implementation of RTI process
with fidelity