temporary diversion sizing when working in waterways...streams and often for construction of dams...

28 September 2013www.stormh2o.com

Temporary Diversion Sizing When Working in Waterways

BY SHANNON TILLACK, ANDREW EARLES, KEN MACKENZIE, AND DAVID BENNETTS

Design considerations, installation, maintenance, and removal

Temporary diversion meth-ods are commonly used to reroute water from a stream or direct flows to a designated portion

of the stream channel to allow for construction activities to take place in the stream, along the banks, or beneath the active channel. Tem-porary diversion methods are often required during the construction of detention ponds, dams, instream grade control structures, bank protection, utility installation, and other activities, including maintenance, that require working in waterways. Temporary diversion methods include temporary diversion channels, pump diver-sions (water is collected and pumped around the construction activities), piped diversions that operate via grav-ity, coffer dams, and other similar

practices. The primary purpose of all temporary diversion methods is to allow for construction to occur in “dry” or dewatered conditions, provid-ing conveyance of stream discharges and protecting water qual-ity by passing upstream flows, up to a specified design event or threshold, around the active construc-tion zone.

The challenge of sizing temporary diversion meth-ods when working in water-ways is encountered across the nation. Little published guidance is available to

determine the appropriate sizing methodology; typically it is considered a means and method choice of the contractor. However, limited guidance has been published indicating that

Coffer dam, installed to allow for grading and streambank stabiliza-tion, consists of concrete blocks covered by an impermeable liner anchored by sand bags.

City

and

Co

unty

of

Den

ver

UD

FC

D

29September 2013 www.stormh2o.com

temporary diversions should be sized to convey the two-year storm event. In the case of the Denver, CO, area, municipalities adopted this two-year temporary diversion method sizing criteria, which oftentimes, for smaller, short-duration maintenance projects, caused the temporary diversions to be oversized and cost more than all the other project costs combined. There-fore, the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD), which was established by the Colorado legislature in 1969 for the purpose of assisting local governments in the Denver met-ropolitan area with multi-jurisdictional drainage and fl ood control problems, published a revised Temporary Diver-sion Methods Fact Sheet as part of its Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM), Volume 3, Con-struction Best Management Practices (BMPs) update. This USDCM is used by more than 30 local jurisdictions within the Denver area and has been used, with appropriate adaptations, as a source of drainage principles, policies, and criteria in municipalities elsewhere in the US and abroad. This article summarizes the temporary diversion method appropriate uses, design considerations, sizing methodol-ogy, and maintenance and removal guidance applicable to Denver and presented in the UDFCD Fact Sheet ( http://udfcd.org/downloads/down_crit-manual_volIII.htm ).

Appropriate UsesTemporary diversion methods are appropriate in situations when it is necessary to divert the fl ow around the area where work is being con-ducted. Temporary diversion methods vary with the size of the waterway that is being diverted.

For large streams, a temporary diversion may consist of berms or coffer dams constructed within the stream to confi ne fl ow to one side of the stream while work progresses on the “dry” side of the berm. For smaller streams and often for construction of dams and detention basins, a tempo-rary diversion method may divert the entire waterway. For short-duration projects (typically less than a month of active construction) with low base-

fl ows, a pump and/or bypass pipe may serve as a temporary diversion. Whenever a temporary diversion is used, construction should be sched-uled during drier times of the year (November through March, in Denver) to the extent feasible, and construction in the waterway should progress as quickly as practical to reduce the risk of exceeding the temporary diver-sion capacity. Timing and duration of construction are primary consider-ations for determining the design fl ow most appropriate for a diversion. A sizing method that does not consider these variables is overly simplistic and can result in infl ated project costs and signifi cant land disturbances in or adjacent to a stream that provide little or no water-quality benefi t. Addition-ally, disturbing more area than neces-sary can result in increased erosion in proximity to the stream.

Temporary diversion method selec-tion and approach should occur on a project- and site-specifi c basis. For short-duration projects (typically associ-

ated with maintenance of utilities and stream crossings and minor repairs to outfalls and eroded banks) constructed during dry times of the year, diversion construction can create greater distur-bance and mobilization of sediment than all of the other earth disturbing activities of the project combined, and the cost of the diversion could be a sig-nifi cant percentage of the overall proj-ect cost. If it can be reasonably deter-mined, based on area and duration of disturbance, that channel work will result in less disturbance and move-ment of sediment than would occur through installation of a temporary diversion, it is reasonable to exempt these activities from the requirement to construct a temporary diversion.

On the other end of the spectrum, a basis of design for a temporary diversion in excess of the methodology presented in the UDFCD Fact Sheet may be appropriate for longer-dura-tion projects and/or projects where the consequences of exceeding diver-sion capacity are signifi cant in terms

Solinst Canada Ltd., 35 Todd Road, Georgetown, ON L7G 4R8 Fax: +1 (905) 873-1992; (800) 516-9081 Tel: +1 (905) 873-2255; (800) [email protected]

www.solinst.com

High Quality Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Instrumentation

Levelogger Edge

Absolute PrecisionWe are proud to introduce the all new Levelogger Edge.

The Levelogger Edge is a self contained water level datalogger, using infra-red data transfer powered by a 10 year lithium battery, offering the flexibility of installing by use of a Direct Read Cable, wireline or Kevlar cord. The Levelogger Edge has a memory capacity of 40,000 temperature and water level data points, or up to 120,000 using the new compression algorithm in linear sampling mode.

New Levelogger Software Version 4.0, written to support the new Levelogger Edge, Levelogger Junior, LTC Levelogger Junior, Rainlogger, Leveloader and is backwards compatible to support the Levelogger Gold series. Version 4.0 offers many new features, including the ability to barometrically compensate multiple Levelogger data files simultaneously.

Titanium based PVD CoatingNow stores up to 120,000 data pointsNew Hastelloy pressure sensorImproved temperature compensation and response time

Enhanced Features


of public safety, damage to infrastructure and property, environmental impacts, damage or delay to the project, and other factors. In short, engineers should recognize that temporary diversions must be thoughtfully analyzed on a case-by-case basis, considering site-specifi c circumstances.

Design ConsiderationsSelection and design of temporary diversion methods should consider many factors, including the following. • Will construction of a temporary diversion cause greater

environmental impacts than if the project is constructed without a temporary diversion? This frequently applies to short-duration, small-scale projects associated with maintenance activities such as bank erosion repair, drop structure and pond maintenance, outfall improvements/repair, and other limited construction activities.

• Size of stream, tributary watershed area, and anticipated fl ow rates during construction. Special consideration should be given to large streams with large tributary areas with higher fl ow rates, because the sizing method-ology presented in the Fact Sheet is based on data from watersheds less than 20 square miles.

• Any special water-quality or aquatic life conditions of the waterway

• Nature of surrounding land use, property ownership, and easements in the project area are important consid-erations in determining feasibility and methods for tem-porary diversions. For example, in a highly urbanized setting or an area with limited right of way, there may not be adequate space to construct a diversion channel.

• Seasonal variations in stream hydrology (basefl ow versus peak fl ow). If an irrigation ditch enters the stream, it is recommended that the ditch company be contacted to confi rm when fl ows from the ditch may be expected. If diversions are constructed during times of the year when thunderstorms and fl ash fl ooding can occur, con-tractors will need to track weather forecasts closely and provide additional protection when higher fl ows from runoff are anticipated.

• Probability of fl ood fl ows exceeding diversion capacity and/or diversion failure. Consider the consequences of exceedance or failure such as public safety, envi-ronmental, legal, regulatory, economic, and project disruption/delay.

• Realistic estimation of project duration and time of year during which construction will occur

• Comparison of the overall project costs to the temporary diversion costs (design and construction) and the costs and benefi ts of different diversion strategies relative to the protection they provide

• Permitting requirements for overall project and for diversion methods (US Army Corps of Engineers, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Emergency Man-agement Agency, Division of Water Resources, local governments, and others). Permit requirements and existing vegetative cover may limit the allowable area disturbance.

• Public safety aspects. For example, if a pipeline or

Be Mobile | Be Smart | Be In-Situ

Innovations inWater Monitoring

Your Smartphone Just Got SmarterYour job takes you everywhere. Colleagues want information instantly.

The new SMARTROLL™ Multiparameter Handheld with the revolutionary iSitu™ App will transform the way you monitor water quality.

Simultaneously measure 14 parameters. Instantly email a data log.

Tag sites with GPS coordinates and photo. Use EPA-approved, optical RDO® Sensor.

Call or visit us at1.800.446.7488

www.in-situ.com

Online contact form: tinyurl.com/c8bb6vx

16TH ANNUAL LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY Water Quality Management

& Planning ConferencePearl South Padre Resort Hotel

310 Padre Blvd.South Padre Island, Texas

April 9 – 11, 2014

COMING SOON Call for Abstracts & Posters

January 31, 2014CFM Class and Exam

April 8, 20142nd Annual LRGV Stormwater Taskforce

Fishing Tournament April 12, 2014

FOR MORE INFORMATION VISITwww.stormwater.tamuk.edu

or e-mail Monica Hernandez at [email protected]

See us at StormCon Booth 719

SAVE THE DATE


channel is being used, consideration should be given to public access and potential hydraulic hazards.

• Legal considerations, which are a function of many differ-ent factors such as property ownership, history of local-ized fl ooding, or parties that will have interest in project

Design and InstallationThe following describes the steps necessary for the design and installation of temporary diversion methods, developed for the metropolitan Denver area.1. Determine if a diversion is appropriate based on appro-

priate uses and design considerations stated earlier. As noted, in some cases, constructing a project under wet conditions is preferable to constructing a temporary diversion to create dry conditions, especially if construc-tion of the temporary diversion will require a signifi cant amount of disturbance relative to the overall project.

2. Determine project duration.• “Long-duration” projects are projects that last longer

than three months, and in many cases are large con-struction projects or traditional land development projects.

• “Short-duration” projects are projects that are com-pleted within one month or less and generally are associated with maintenance and repair activities.

• “Interim-duration” projects are projects that will last longer than one month but up to three months.

3. Determine the time of year in which construction will occur to determine if the project will be constructed dur-ing the dry or wet season.

4. Gather necessary temporary diversion sizing parameters that may include tributary area, imperviousness, project duration safety factor, and seasonal sizing coeffi cient defi ned below.

5. Apply applicable sizing methodology and perform neces-sary calculations as discussed below. Use engineering judgment to determine if the temporary diversion design fl ow is adequate for the specifi c project.

6. Determine appropriate method of diversion. Follow the design steps for the selected method discussed below.• Channel Diversion–For smaller streams, construction

of dams and detention basins—or, as the site allows, a channel diversion—may divert the entire waterway.

• Berm or Coffer Dam–A berm or coffer dam is appro-priate for streams of all sizes to confi ne fl ow to one side of the stream.

• Piped Diversion–A bypass pipe is generally appro-priate for short-duration projects with low basefl ows.

• Pumped Diversion–A pumped diversion may be ap-propriate for short-duration projects with low base-fl ows. It may also be the only option where space for the diversion is limited.

7. Consider developing an emergency action plan, as a precaution, for rapidly removing equipment and materi-als with potential to contribute pollutants to runoff from the waterway in advance of imminent runoff with the potential to exceed diversion capacity. The emergency action plan should designate an individual who will


be on the site throughout most of the construction project with the authority to order that work be halted and equipment and materi-als with potential to contribute to stormwater pollution be moved to high ground outside the active channel. The emergency action plan should identify where equip-ment and materials removed from the channel will be stored tempo-rarily during a runoff event that is expected to exceed temporary diversion capacity.

Sizing MethodologyThe methodology for sizing of tempo-rary diversion methods was developed using basefl ow observations and Crest Stage Indicator (CSI) peak fl ow data collected from 21 watersheds within the UDFCD boundary. These data were collected over extended periods of time (up to 31 years) and, as a result, provide a sound statistical basis for the sizing methodology.

The sizing procedure is determined

based on the project duration.• Long-duration projects last longer

than three months and in many cases are large construction projects or traditional land development projects.

• Short-duration projects are com-pleted within one month or less and generally are associated with main-tenance and repair activities. For these projects, it is recommended that the temporary diversion be sized based on the statistics identi-fi ed for basefl ows (i.e., as opposed to peak fl ows) and be of suffi cient size to convey a fl ow that has a less than 50% chance of being exceeded between November and March, including a project duration safety factor.

• Interim-duration projects last longer than one month but up to three months. In these projects, engineer-ing judgment must be applied, drawing on sizing methods for short-duration and long-duration project criteria and the time of year of con-

struction to develop a basis of design for the temporary diversion method that is appropriate for the project.In the metropolitan Denver area, it is highly recommended that projects

Diversion constructed of sheet piling to allow for a small bank stabilization project

Visit Usat

StormCon2013

Booth 204


involving temporary diversions be constructed between November and March. If a short-duration project requiring a temporary diversion must be conducted between April and October, the extended weather forecast should be evaluated to avoid periods of anticipated pre-cipitation, and a conservative safety factor should be applied. Additional protection may need to be provided for the site if higher fl ows from runoff are anticipated.

Sizing Procedure for Long-Duration Projects The sizing procedure for long-duration projects is based on the estimated

two-year peak fl ow rates based on watershed imperviousness for small waterways (25 square miles or less). A temporary diversion facility sizing nomograph for long-duration proj-ects based on two-year peak fl ows is presented in the UDFCD Fact Sheet. There are a multitude of factors affecting rainfall-runoff response of a watershed in addition to impervious area. Other factors include soil types, total area, fraction of connected/dis-connected impervious area, watershed shape, and topography. The nomo-graph provides a simplifi ed design tool based on watershed imperviousness but should not be blindly relied upon without due consideration of other fac-tors including those listed above and others. This nomograph is applicable for the Denver metropolitan and adja-cent areas. Because this nomograph

was developed using data from small watersheds, it is not appropriate to extrapolate from this fi gure for larger, more complex watersheds or for other regions. For larger waterways, includ-ing ones controlled by fl ood control reservoirs, site-specifi c hydrologic analysis and risk assessment will be necessary to evaluate the appropri-ate level of protection to be provided by the temporary diversion. For any size watershed, it is important that the designer understand watershed char-acteristics to determine applicability of the simplifi ed method and how these characteristics infl uence the choice of diversion method. It is also important to recognize that larger fl oods can and do occur. It is the responsibility of the designer and the contractor to assess their risk of having the tempo-rary diversion being exceeded and to evaluate the damages such an event may cause to the project, adjacent properties, and others.

Sizing Procedure for Short-Duration Projects The sizing procedure for short-duration projects is based on an empirical equation used to calculate the recom-mended temporary diversion design fl ow rate. The temporary diversion design fl ow rate in cubic feet per sec-ond is calculated by taking the product of the tributary area in square miles, diversion sizing coeffi cient based on the seasonality of the project, and a safety factor coeffi cient based on duration.

The sizing coeffi cient, K, is based on the seasonality of the project. For short-duration projects that will occur during the traditionally dry period of the year (November through March), a K value of 0.2 is recommended. For short-dura-tion projects that will occur in April through October, and if wet weather is not predicted, a K value of 0.5 is recommended. For projects that span two months with different K values, use the greater of the two K values.

The safety factor, S, is based on proj-ect duration. Short-duration projects have been broken down further into projects less than two weeks and proj-ects from two weeks up to one month. For example, for a project duration of less than two weeks, a safety factor

Lined temporary diversion channel

Call

for

a Fr

ee E

stim

ate

800.

662.

6465

ww

w.c

entr

ipip

e.co

m

RST

RUCT

URAL

CON

CRET

E LI

NING

• 36

” an

d la

rger

• ro

und,

arc

hed

or e

llipt

ical

• no

dig

- n

o di

srup

tion

• ce

ntrif

ugal

ly c

ompa

cted

• pr

ecis

e th

ickn

ess

• en

viro

nmen

tally

saf

e•

fully

stru

ctur

al

An

oth

er tr

ench

less

so

luti

on

by

AP/M

PER

MAF

ORM

Visit

Us

at St

orm

Con

2013

Boot

h 60

6


of 1.0 is recommended. For a project duration of two weeks to one month, the safety factor of 1.5 should be used.

Of course, if the observed condi-tion at the construction site suggests a higher fl ow, this should be estimated and used instead.

Sizing Procedure for Interim-Duration Projects When projects last longer than one month but up to three months, a com-bination of sizing methods should be applied. The recommended temporary diversion fl ow rate should be evalu-ated using both the sizing procedure for short-duration projects as well as the sizing procedure for long-duration projects. These calculated fl ow rates should be weighed in combination with site-specifi c factors to determine an appropriate design fl ow rate. Each site should be evaluated individually to determine factors that may affect the design fl ow choice. For example, the designer may select to use the more conservative design fl ow for an interim-duration project occurring in July and August when a chance for wet weather is forecast and fl ooding or damage to the area surrounding the project is unacceptable.

Maintenance and RemovalBecause temporary diversions are one of the most critical best management practices for work in waterways, they must be inspected and maintained frequently to remain in effective operat-ing condition. Flow barriers should be inspected at the start and end of each workday and at any time excess water is noted in dry work areas. For diversion channels, the diversion channel itself should be inspected for signs of ero-sion, and the lining should be repaired or replaced if there are signs of failure. Check armoring at the diversion return point to the waterway, and add addi-tional armoring if erosion is noted.

For related articles: www.stormh2o.com/BMP-new-construction

FFaircloth Skimmer® Surface Drains for Sediment Basins

PVC skimmer floats on the surface, releasing the cleanest water Drains from the basin’s SURFACE instead

of the bottom Improves basin performance Simple, automatic, gravity operation Works in basins with risers or

sediment traps with spillway

Patent #5,820,751

Replaces perforated risers and stone outlets as the basin’s drain Convenient for using a detention basin as a temporary sediment

basin during construction 8 sizes available Inlet orifice easily adjusted for drawdown requirements

Sizes, flow rates, prices, illustrations, instructions and SIZING CALCULATOR online at www.FairclothSkimmer.com

J W Faircloth & Son Inc. Hillsborough, NC 27278(919) 732-1244 (919) 732-1266 Fax


Water should not be allowed to fl ow back through the natural stream until all construction is completed. After redirecting the fl ow through the natural channel, temporary diversion measures should be removed. For temporary diversion channels, lining materials should be removed, and the diversion channel should then be backfi lled and stabilized.

ConclusionAlthough the temporary diversion sizing methodology presented in this article was developed for the metro-politan Denver area and is based on local stream fl ow data, the procedure identifi es and describes many universal factors that must be considered in the design of temporary diversions, regard-less of the geographic location. The methodology outlined in this article can be applied to develop similar sizing crite-ria in other locations around the country where suitable basefl ow and low-fl ow stream data are available. For larger and longer-duration projects, the two-year

standard (or even a larger design event, depending on project-specifi c character-istics) would still be applicable; however, for smaller, short-duration projects, the methodology described can result in reduced land disturbance and environ-mental damage associated with tempo-rary diversions, while providing effective

water management appropriate to the construction activity.

Shannon Tillack, P.E., and Andrew Earles, Ph.D., P.E., are with Wright Water Engineers Inc. in Denver, CO. Ken MacKenzie, P.E., and David Bennetts, P.E., are with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District in Denver.

Lined temporary diversion channel

Presto Geosystems® or www.prestogeo.com

GEOBLOCK®— Over 30 years of reliable turf protection.

AP-6847 R1

PRESTO

GEOBLOCK®

T U R F P R O T E C T I O N S Y S T E M

The green solution for managing stormwater runoff.

DRIVE-ON GRASS PAVEMENTS.H20 Loading, H20 Friendly

temporary diversion sizing when working in waterways...streams and often for construction of dams...

Documents