ED 136 649

TITLE

INSTITUTIONRUB DATENOTEAVAILABLE FROM

DOCUMENT RESUME

HE 008 697

The State Board of Regents 1975-76 Annual Report ofthe State University and Community College System ofTennessee.Tennessee State Board of Regents, Nashville.Sep 7681p.The State University and Community College System ofTennessee, 1161 Murfreesboro Road, Nashville,Tennessee 37217

EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$4.67 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Administrative Policy; Adult Education; Annual

Reports; College Faculty; College Graduates; CollegeLibraries; *Colleges; College Students; *CommunityColleges; Degrees (Titles); Educational Finance;Facilities; Facility Expansion; Financial Policy;*Higher Education; Program Development; *State Boardsof Education; Tables (Data); *Universities

IDENTIFIERS *Tennessee

ABSTRACTThe report covers the period from July 1, 1975 to

June 30, 1976. General information is given on board membership andstaff, member institutions, enrollment, graduates, faculty,libraries, academic program development, public service andcontinuing education, student life, and policies, campus facilitiesdevelopment, and business and finance achievements and policies.Appendices giving more complete data are included.. (MSE)

***********************************************************************Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished

* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort ** to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal ** reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality ** of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available ** via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not* responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions ** supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original.***********************************************************************

1975-76 ANNUAL REPORTcy

The State University and CommunityCollege System of Tennessee

2

THE STATE BOARD OF REGENTS

1975-76 ANNUAL REPORT

of theSTATE UNIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEMOF TENNESSEE

for the period of July 1, 1975 to June 30, 1976

Submitted by Dr. Roy S. Nicks, Chancellor

3

The State Universityand Community College System of Tennessee1161 Murfreesboro Road Nashville, Tennessee 37217 (615) 741-4821

September 1, 1976

The Honorable Ray Blanton, Governor, andMembers of the General Assembly:

Tennessee Code Annotated 49-3242 provides thatthe State Board of Regents shall make and submit anAnnual Report to the Governor and Legislature at the endof each fiscal year. On behalf of the Board of Regents andthe sixteen member institutions of the State University andCommunity College System of Tennessee, I am pleased totransmit herewith our Annual Report for the period ofJuly 1, 1975, to June 30, 1976.

We submit this report for your review and referenceas a chronicle of this System's major accomplishmentsand significant activities during fiscal 1976. Further, wepresent the progress and achievements recorded in thisreport in full recognition and appreciation of the supportreceived from the executive and legislative branches ofState government, and look forward to the continuation ofour mutual efforts in providing quality higher education inTennessee.

RSN:w

Since rely,

y S. Nickshancellor

Austin Peay State University East Tennessee State University Memphis State University Middle Tennessee State University

Tennessee State University Tennessee Technological University

Chattanooga State Technical Community College Cleveland State Community College Columbia State Community College

Dyersburg State Community College Jackson State Community College Motlow State Community College Roane State Community

College Shelby State Community College Volunteer State Community College Walters State Community College

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION 2

REPORT FROM THE CHANCELLOR 7

Instruction 9

Public Service and Continuing Education 14

Student Life 16

Campus Development. 18

Business arid Finance 20

APPENDICES 22

Accreditation 23

Enrollment. 26

Graduates 32

Faculties 36

Libraries 40

Changes in Academic Units. 42

Off-Campus Locations 45

Physical Facilities 47

Finance 51

1

STATE BOARD OF REGENTS

Members(Member, title, address, term)

The Honorable Ray BlantonGovernor, Chairman, Nash-ville, Ex-officioMr. Ben S. KimbroughVice Chairman, Clarksville,July 1, 1972 to June 30, 1976Dr. Sam H. IngramCommissioner of Education,Nashville, Ex-officioMr. Edward S. PorterCommissioner of Agricul-ture, Nashville, Ex-officioDr. G. Wayne BrownExecutive Director of TheTennessee Higher EducationCommission, Nashville, Ex-officioDr. Claude C. BondChattanooga, July 1, 1975 toJune 30, 1984Dr. Kenneth P. EzellMurfreesboro, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1974, July 1, 1974 toJune 30, 1983Mr. Dale F. GloverObion, July 1, 1972 toJune 30,1978Mr. Dwight Henrystudent, Tennessee Techno-logical University, July 1,1975 to June 30, 1976Mr. James H. Jones, Jr.Mt. Pleasant, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1976, July 1, 1976 toJune 30, 1985Mr. George M. Klepper, Jr.Memphis, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1979Mr. Charles J. LinerAthens, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1977

Mrs. Johnella H. MartinNashville, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1973, July 1, 1973 toJune 30, 1982Miss Ella V. RossJohnson City, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1980Mr. J. Frank TaylorHuntingdon, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1978Mr. J. Howard Warfimmediate past Commis-sioner of Education, Hohen-wald, July 1, 1972 to June 30,1975, July 1, 1975 to June 30,1978Mr. David V. WhiteKnoxville, July 1, 1972 toJune 30, 1974, July 1, 1974to June 30, 1983

CommitteesAcademic Policies and Pro-gramsMr. Dale F. GloverChairman

Dr. G. Wayne BrownDr. Kenneth P. EzellMr. Dwight HenryDr. Sam H. IngramMr. Edward S. PorterMr. J. Howard WarfBylawsMr. Dale F. GloverChairman

Mr. James H. Jones, Jr.Mr. Edward S. PorterMiss Ella V. RossMr. J. Frank TaylorFinance and Business Oper-ationsMr. James H. JonesChairman

Mr. Ben S. KimbroughMr. George M. Klepper, Jr.Mr. Charles J. Liner

2

6

Mrs. Johnella H. MartinMr. J. Howard WarfMr. David V. WhitePersonnelMr. J. Frank TaylorChairman

Dr. Claude C. BondDr. G. Wayne BrownDr. Kenneth P. EzellDr. Sam H. IngramMr. Charles J. LinerMrs. Johnella H. MartinStudent LifeMiss Ella V. RossChairman

Dr. Claude C. BondMr. Dwight Henry.Mr. James H. Jones, Jr.Mr. George M. Klepper, Jr.Mr. David V. White

MeetingsAugust 15, 1975Motlow State CommunityCollege

TullahomaOctober 17, 1975Roane State CommunityCollege

Harriman*November 10, 1975SBR Central OfficeNashvilleDecember 12, 1975Middle Tennessee State Uni-versity

MurfreesboroMarch 5,1976Volunteer State CommunityCollege

Gallatin*May 31, 1976SBR Central OfficeNashvilleJune 25, 1976,

Memphis State UniversityMemphis*Called Session

Student, facultyappointmentsto committeesCommittee on Academic Pol-icies and ProgramsMiss Diane Lowe, studentAustin Peay State Univer-sity

Mr. John Smith, student,Chattanooga State TechnicalCommunity College

Dr. William Windham, Pro-fessor of History, MiddleTennessee State University

Dr. William Majors, Profes-sor of History, Mot low StateCommunity College

Committee on Finance andBusiness OperationsMr. John Stevenson, student,Memphis State University

Mr. Wes Martz, student,Cleveland State CommunityCollege

Dr. Phillip Campana, Pro-fessor of Foreign Lan-guages, Tennessee Techno-logical University

Mr. Steve Parsons, Assist-ant Professor of Account-ing, Roane State CommunityCollege

Committee on PersonnelMiss Teena Brown, student,Dyersburg State CommunityCollege

Mr. John Bloodworth, stu-dent, Columbia State Com-munity College

Dr. James Threalkill, As-sociate Professor of Psy-

chology, Tennessee StateUniversity

Mr. Fred B. Morgan, In-structor of Marketing,Shelby State CommunityCollege

Committee on Student LifeMr. Hai Smith, student, EastTennessee State University

Miss Ted Braddy, student,Jackson State CommunityCollege

Dr. Richard Herrmann, As-sociate Professor of His-tory and Philosophy, Vol-unteer State CommunityCollege

Mrs. Roberta Roy, Assist-ant Professor of English,Walters State CommunityCollege

Pursuant to State Board of RegentsPolicy No. 1:010 6:10, "Student andfaculty participation in Board consid-erations," adopted June 20, 1975, eightstudents and eight faculty membersfrom the Syem institutions were des-ignated by Chancellor Nicks to serveas ex-officio, non-voting members onfour of the Board's Standing Com-mittees for the 1975-76 academic year.This means of direct participation ofstudents and faculty in Board conskl-erations enjoyed great success in itsfirst year of implementation. The in-dividuarktudents and faculty addedsignificantly to the deltherations andcommunication of Board concerns.

StaffDr. Roy S. Nicks, ChancellorMr. Richard G. RhodaAssistant to the Chancellor

Mrs. Kathleen G. WestAdministrative Assistant tothe Chancellor

Mr. David C. PorteousGeneral Counsel (Secretary

3

7

of the Board)Mr. William T. HillAssistant-General Counsel

Dr. W. Wray BuchananVice Chancellor for Aca-demic Affairs

Dr. Charles B. FancherAssociate Vice Chancellorfor Academic Affairs

Dr. Lawrence B. FuldauerDirector of Academic andRelated Programs

Dr. Milton W. PhillipsDirector of Continuing Edu-cation

Dr. J. Scott FryDirector of Academic In-formation Services

Mr. James R. VadenVice Chancellor for Busi-ness and Finance (Treas-urer of the Board)

Mr. H. Clay HarkleroadAssistant Vice Chancellorfor Business and Finance

Mr. Arthur E. DruckenmillerAssistant Vice Chancellor-for Information Systems

Miss Elaine J. OfficerResearch Analyst

Mrs. Dianne BrightAccountant

Mr. Donald C. MerrymanDirector of Purchasing

Mr. James B. Washburn, Jr.Budget Officer

Mr. Elijah E. HallDirector of Computer Serv-ices

Dr. Peter J. PereVice Chancellor for CampusPlanning and Facilities De-velopment

Mr. Richard H. ShellhardtDirector of Physical Facil-ities

Member institutions isuCommunity Colleges APSU

.11 UniversitiesDSCC

zi

';:.f °v. s/ \ I 004 77

V S CC

RSCC

VA

O.C.''tc: .4.0' 1400ER C Ott -, ,s 0,, _A Isl.. EN NI SY%

Lov; i? st, iv4" sc's GnEENE";:::j .-4IN 0 Ra/;').' peCH "

MSU (4.,..S;.;;I' if.--..D...4,4100/ id"? 95.7.*/*s soN 1

74)-Stqw.c.orr0 ; \pc la 4 V21 v . 1 %, i.....1" 1 ,.:..,p, \ 1.:..e.

,..i., 70.,04. i I 4.... -i I 1 3 _.....-*.e 1 1 iscO/o.olc°"" 7.- NI.

' 1(1. i s' 1. 1 61 w^" l i I '.0 TN.1 -.' -.-1'),..L...., ..!. GqCS 1 1 g /........ V-

r 444 4,44 M A R I El N r.,:r /______i___,_2.2--.4_7_.i--

msccI

cisccMTSU

I I ;) Tsscci

BCCCoSCC

ALA

Austin Peay State UniversityPresident Robert 0. RiggsClarksvilleEast Tennessee State UniversitYPresident D.P. CulpJohnson CityMemphis State UniversityPresident Billy M. JonesMemphisMiddle Tennessee State UniversitYPresident M.G. ScarlettMurfreesboroTennessee State UniversityPresident Frederick S. HumphriesNashvilleTennessee Technological UniversityPresident Arliss L. RoadenCookevilleChattanooga State Technical CommunityPresident Charles W. BranchChattanoogaCleveland State Community CollegePresident David F. AdkissonCleveland

t.w.COLN

College

4

8

CSTCC

ETSU

Colinnbia State Community CollegePresident Harold S. PryorColumbiaDyersburg State Community CollegePresident Edward B. EllerDYersburgJackson State Conununit/ CollegeInterim President Walter L. NelmsJacksonMotlow State Community CollegePresident Harry D. WagnerTullahomaRoane state Community CollegePresident Cuyler A. DunbarHarrimanShelby state Conununity CollegePresident Jess H. ParrishMemphisVolunteer State Community CollegePresident Hal R. RamerGallatinWalters State Community CollegePresident Jack E. CampbellMorristown

ChangesBoard

Dr. Claude C. Bond wasappointed by Governor Ray Blantonto serve as the representative of theThird Congressional District on theBoard of Regents, upon the June 30,1975, expiration of the term of Dr. C.N. Berry. Dr. Bond s formal intro-duction to the Board took place atthe August 22, 1975, regular session.His term shall extend through June30, 1984,

Dr. Bond is the Assistant Superin-tendent for Pupil Personnel Servicesin the Chattanooga Public Schools.He is a former principal, teacher,and coach on the elementary and se-condary educational levels. A grad-uate of Lane College in Jackson,Tennessee, he holds degrees from(.;

Fisk Uni4ersity and George PeabodyCollege for Teachers.

Dr. Bond is extremely active innumerous facets of educational andcivic service. He is a member of theTennessee Student Assistance Corp-oration. He is a former vice presidentand now serves on the Board of Di-rectors of the Chattanooga Chamberof Commerce. He also holds mem-bership on the Boards of Directorsof Junior Achievement, the UnitedFund, the YMCA, and the CherokeeChapter of Boy Scouts.

Chief administratorsDr. Robert 0. Riggs Was

selected by the Board on November 10,1975, as President of Austin PeayState University. Dr. Riggs assumedthe position in January, 1976,upon the effective retirementdate of Dr. Joe Morgan, Presidentof the University since 1962.

Dr. Riggs, born October 15, 1942,in Portland, Tennessee, attended thepublic schools of Sumner County.He received the B.A. Degree fromVanderbilt University, and both theM.Ed and Ed.D Degrees from Mem-phis State University. Prior to hisappointment at Austin Peay, Dr.Riggs was the Dean of the School ofEducation at Madison College (Vir-ginia). Previous positions held atMadison College were AssociateDean of the School of Education,and Executive Assistant to the Presi-dent and Director of Administrationand Planning. Earlier experience inTennessee higher education includedservice as the Assistant to the Chan-cellor and Director of EducationalDevelopment and Research at theUniversity of Tennessee at Martin,and Director of Budget and Plan-ning at Memphis State University.

Dr. Walter L. Nelms was ap-pointed by the Board of Regents asInterim President of Jackson StateCommunity College on May 31, 1976.The necessity for an Interim Presi-dent was caused by the death of Dr.Francis E. Wright on May 15, 1976.Dr. Wright, 61, had served as Presi-dent of Jackson State since its open-ing in 1967.

Dr. Nelms, 43, the Dean of theCollege, is one of the original staffmembers ofJackson State. Prior ex-perience included serving as an As-sistant Professor and later an Associ-ate Professor of Education at Mem-phis State University. Earlier em-ployment included teaching and ad-ministrative positions on the second-ary education level at institutions inArkansas and West Tennessee. Heearned the B.A. and M.A.T. Degreesfrom Harding Co-ltegelArlarrism),

and the Ed.D. from the University ofMississippi.

Dr. Nelm's term in service as In-terim President of Jackson State wascontingent upon the selection of Ccnew President for the College by theBoard of Regents. The Board, at itsMay 31, 1975, called session, directedChancellor Nicks to take steps towardthe selection, and to be in a positionto submit a recommendation for anew President for their considerationno later than August 1, 1976.

Dr. F. E. WrightThe May 15, 1976, death of Dr. F.

E. Wright ended a distinguished ca-reer of a vital leader in TennesseeHigher Education. Dr. Wright was amuch loved figure in the JacksonCommunity and his passing wasmourned throughout the State. Attheir June 25, 1976, meeting, theBoard of Regents adopted a resolu-tion of commemoration for Dr.Wright which expressed their:respectand gratitude for Dr. Wright and hislasting contributions to higher edu-cation in Tennessee, and their heart-felt condolences to Dr. Wright'sfamily and friends.

Dr. Wright, born April 19, 1915, inDeQueen, Arkansas, was appointedin 1967, as the original President ofJackson State, one of the first com-munity colleges to be established inTennessee. Prior to this appoint-ment, he served Union University inJackson, as President from 1963 to1967, and as Academic Dean from1954 to 1963. While at Jackson State,Dr. Wright led the institution to fullaccreditation and recognition in corn-

--nwrilty-and-regiNiargervice.

REPORT FROM THE CHANCELLOR(The following are excerpts oft/it.?

rej a ce to the address given byC S. Nicks to tehancellor Roy hBoard of Regents at their lastregular session of the 1975-76fiscal .vear)

-I would like to highlight someof the major themes and eyents ofthis 1975-76 fiscal year as Iperceive them. I feel this has beena sign1/4cant year for the SystemIFi terms of the matters that havebeen dealt with and the actionsthat have been taken by theBoard. the Board staff and theinstitutions.

"This fiscal )7ear marks my firstfull year of service with theSystem. And this factor in itselfplaces me in a rather opportunepositiOn to assess the twelve-Mon.th period as a definite tinie-ft-aloe.

..Perhaps the best way to capturethe setting for this year is torestate the basic facts and to Saythat during this period, wea n d to make the Mostttespteefficient and effective uses possibleof all the resources we hadavailable, and that all of our .

resalrc"s financial student, andpersonnel were provided for tothe best of our abilities.

Oar enrollments for fall 1975reach ed new heights. Sixty-fivethousand, nine hundred and foiirFTE students throughout theSystem represented an increase of19.37,, over the enrollments of theprevimts fall. Of this total, au?

students, and the communitycolleges grew by 37.8%. Our totalheadcount enrollment of 84,014students in the fall, earned theSystem the ranking of 9th largestla the nation. This year. wegraduated approximately 12,000students.

"This has been an austere yearwith a great niany demandsplaced upon us. .Simply stated.our state appropriationsincreasedonly 4.0% over the previous.year's, while at the same time ourstudent enrollments increased12.3%. In addition, the factors ofsignificant increases in f- -dgeneral inflation, and lacking.state funding affected all of ourOperations. The impact of thesecircumstances can be epitomizedby the fact that our personnel hadto accept an average salaryincrease of 2.5% for the year. and

'that the threat of enrollmentlimitations loomed over many ofthe institutions and was in factimposed at Shelby State.

"Further, this has been a yearwhen a number of the practices ofOur System and of higher educationin general have been questioned-by students, faculties, the generalpublic, the Legislature, and byourselves.. The questioning hasrangedfri5m the open challengesto .our tenure policy to the moretempered study of our degreerequirements and institutions rolesand scopes. As a result, we havereassessed the basic assumptionsunderlying .many of these pract-

7

1 0

"Th., successfully meeting ourcommitments for the yeas; and incontinuing to fulfill our obligationsto provide quality education and'the expected serviccs, the Systemas a cohesive entity workedeffectively-by snaking hard-decis-ions, planning for stability andchange, and de yeloping stasidardsfor the future. As a result. I feelthat considerable gains have.beenmade and that viable contributionshave been made toward afirni andsolid foundation for our advance-ment in the next and followingyears.

"In the given setting and to theend of progress by building on andenhancing our available means.structure, and resources. theniaior events of this fiscal yearmay be capsulized into fourrelated, yet distinct themes:

1. Our role as a System wasfurther developed and asserted.During the year. the actions andresponsibilities of .our System, asa System, became more .definedand exercised. Internally, adesirable balance of priorities wasassumed in programs and projectfunding. Externally. our goal ofequity-with the other .system inthe sonic areas, and tvithin stategovernment as a whole-was pursuedand neared significantly.

2. Significant gains were madein internal management orientat-ion. The management of availableresources was and is of groatimportance. A number of Systemstudies, formulated to generatemanagement information, havebeen undertaken during theyear.A number ,Board- policies-

adopted thlring this period reflecta keen interest in managenlent onthe appropriate level of responsib-ility. Also: a Management ByObjectives program has beenimplemented on the Board staffand many:- of the institutionaladministrative levels.

3. The Sys tenl's means ofresponsiveness was exercised andexp(lnded. This is apparent in two .

areas: a) the nature of the issuesthat have been addressed by theBoard has reflected many of theconcerns voiced by various Campusand non-campus' groups: and b)the lines of comtnunication withinthe Systenl have been broadenedas has the input to the Board'sconsiderations-by the creation ofsub-councils and placement ofstudents and faculty on the BoardCommittees. We have also seenan increasing in vOlvement :ofcampus groups in System con cernSas well as campus affairs. Taskforces and special committeeshave been formed to addressissues of System inlport.

4. Our working relationships-within the System and with outside'

agencies, bodieS, and the public-:were enhanced. During the year,we have enjoyed effective relation-ships internally as they pertain toshared assulnptions and expectat-ions. Our various roles-the Board's,the Board staffs, and the institut-ions'-in the operation of theSystem have complemented oneanother. Outside of the System,we have pursued and attainedviable relations with the otherstate agencies and the Legislature.

"The actions that this Board,my office, and the institutionshave taken during this yearsupport and reflect these fourthemes. This is evident upon areview of the significant events inthe nlajor areas of our Systenl'soperations. ...In a time .beset byfinancial constraints and reassess-ment of practices and priorities,these were and are vital objectives.

"...As we move forward into anew fiscal year, the accomplish-ments and events of the 1975-76fiscal year have set a firmfoundation for further progressand advancement''

Roy S. NicksJune 25, 1976

...the System institutions con-ferred a record number of 11,883degrees during the 1975-76 fiscalyear.

InstructionEnrollment

Student enrollments within theSystem increased at a near pheno-menal rate in Fall 1975. Institutionsacross the board were met with re-cord numbers of students from allage and socio-economic groups. Inmany cases special arrangements inscheduling and programming wererequired to fully meet the needs anddemands of the 84,014 degree-creditstudents of the state universities andcommunity colleges. This number ofstudents earned recognition for theSystem as the nint! 'argest Systemin the country, acc Jing to an an-nual, national study. A composite ofenrollment statistics are shown inthis report in Tables 2 through 5of the Appendix.

Compared to Fall 1974, degree-credit student headcount enroll-ments increased by 12.9% in the totalSystemfrom 74,441 to 84,014. Theuniversities 59,509 students repre-sented a 6.2% increase over the pre-vious year, the community colleges'24,505 students presented a 33.1%increase over. 1974. As a result ofthese increases, 64.5% of all studentsattending the state-supported insti-tutions of Tennessee were enrolledin the System's member institutions.

By level, students in the Systemwere distributed as follows: 42% werefreshmen, 19% were sophomores,10% were juniors, 11% were seniors,9% were graduate and professionalstudents, and 9% came under thespecial-undergraduate and graduatecategory. It is noteworthy that almostexactly 50% of the total System fresh-man enrollments were at the com-

munity colleges. This is significantof the tremendous growth of thecommunity colleges in just ten yearsof operation in Tennessee.

Further significance is also seenin the total increase of freshmenfrom 1974 to 1975. The 35,361 stu-dents classified as freshmen in Fall1975 mark an increase of 7,788 or28% over the Fall 1974 freshmen.'Such growth at the initial level ofhigher education indicates a sub-stantial increase in interest for col-lege education with major implica-tions for future growth and develop-ment at the institutions.

Enrollment growth was also ex-perienced in Fall 1975, in terms ofFTE (full-time equated) students. Infact, the 12.3% System increase inthis measure of enrollments broughtthe total FTE to an unprecedentedhigh of 65,904. FTE is derived fromthe total number of student credithours generated and divided by whatis considered as a full-time studentwork load, 15 hours for an under-graduate and 12 hours for a graduatestudent. The FTE enrollments at theuniversities as a group increased by5.6% and totaled 49,027, the com-munity colleges increased by 37.8%to a total of 16,877. At two of theuniversities and eight of the commu-nity colleges, the increases in FTEwere greater than those in head-count. This is significant of morestudents taking more full work loadsthan in the past. It is reflective ofthe institutions' efforts in providinggreater access and flexibility incourse programming.

Out-of-state enrollments decreas-ed in the System in 1975-76, both inabsolute and relative numbers. InFall 1975, 6,209 students from otherstates and foreign countries were en-

rolled in the System. These students,representing primarily the neighbor-ing states, composed 7.4% of the totalnumber of students. The out-of-statestudents in Fall 1974 totaled 7,001or 9.4% of the total System head-count enrollment. This decrease of11% in out-of-state students revealsthe System's outstanding growth inFall 1975 to be largely a matter ofTennesseans attending their state-supported colleges and universities.

GraduatesTo a large degree, an institution's

productivity is measured by its num-ber of graduates. In this regard, theSystem institutions conferred a re-cord number of 11,883 degrees dur-ing the 1975-76 fiscal year. This totalrepresents students graduating fromthe entire realm of degree programsoffered within the System which en-compasses the associate, baccalau-reate, graduate, and professionalprograms at the universities, andthe certificate and associate pro-grams at the community colleges.This total marks an increase of 8.7%or 948 degrees over the 10,935 awar-ded during the previous year.

Demonstrated below are the 1974-75/1975-76 comparisons of degreesawarded by level and type of insti-tution.

Of particular significance in thesecomparisons are the substantial in-creases in the associate and graduatedegree program graduates. The evi-denced popularity of associate de-grees with students is due to thedesirability of a two-year programthat affords flexibility in terms ofqualification for many entry-leveljobs for continuation in a four-year degree program. Eighty-four

Many students are extending theirprograms past the traditional four-year period while holding jobs.

percent of the total associate degreeswere awarded by the communitycolleges. The continued trends ofgrowth in community college enroll-ments are in large part reflective ofstudents' and local employers de-mands for the associate level of train-ing and education.

The composite increase in grad-uates from post-baccalaureate pro-grams totaled 23.7% over the pre-vious year. This increase is indicativeof heightLned interest by studentsfor advanced expc.,.se and profes-sional training. Undergirding the in-crease were tightened job marketconditions and elevating requisitequalifications for advanced employ-ment opportunities.

The bachelors degree programsmaintained the largest level of grad-uates. In 1975-76, over five out ofevery ten students emerging from adegree program were working to-ward a bachelors degree. It shouldbe noted that the slight decrease1.8%) in bachelors degree graduates

is representative of the universities'efforts toward mainlining the pro-grams to reduce dual degree attain-

ment. Further, the stabilized levelof graduates can be partially attribut-ed to a growing proportion of part-time students. Thus, many studentsare extending their programs pastthe traditional four-year period whileholding jobs.

The distribution of discipline areasin which degrees were awarded dur-ing 1975-76 remained much the sameas previous years with significantcorrelations to employment oppor-tunities. A great majority of the asso-ciate degrees were earned in thetechnology-related fields, with healthservices and paramedical technologycontinuing as high yielding areas ofinterest. Eighty percent of all bache-lors degrees earned were Bachelorsof Science, with those of appliednaturesuch as business and manage-ment, the physical sciences, and thesocial sciencesgaining in emphasis.A large proportion of the graduatedegrees earned were in education-related fields.

A complete summary of degreesawarded by the institutions in 1975-76 is shown in Table 6 of the Appen-dix of this report.

Degree LevelNumber of Degrees1974-75 1975-76 Increase Increase

Certificate 44. 112 68 154.5

Associate 1,845 2,297 452 74.5

Bachelors 6,713 6,589 1124)

Masters 7,085 2,532 447 21.4Specialist in Education . 48 102 54 112.5

J u ris Doctor. 147 181 34 23.1

Doctorate 53 70 17 32.1

Type of InstitutionUniversity 9,364 9,846 482 5.1

Community College 1,571 2,037 466 29,7

10

13

FacultyA great deal of activity and action

took place during 1975-76 regardingfaculty at the System institutions.Affected by related actions in acade-mic program development and busi-ness and finance areas, faculty andtheir unique concerns were in them-selves the focus of attention in anumber of Board level considera-tions. New policies and major policyrevisions in the areas of tenure andfaculty development and compensa-tion programs marked the progressachieved by the System in facultyaffairs.

It is significant that this period ofvital activity in addressing facultyconcerns was the first year of facultymembership on the Standing Com-mittees of the Board of Regents.Implementing the Board's decisionof the previous year, eight facultymembers from among the institutionswere appointed to serve on the Com-mittees for the 1975-76 academicyear. This means of direct partici-pation by faculty proved to be ex-tremely beneficial in the considera-tion of Board matters.

During 1975-76, the institutionswere staffed by 2,516 full-time teach-ing faculty, 1,984 at the universitiesand 532 at the community colleges.These individuals represent the mosthighly credentialed faculty in theSystem's history: 1,246 or 50% holdearned doctorates, 154 or 6% havemasters degrees plus ninety hoursof course work, 204 or 8% have mas-ters degrees plus forty-five hours ofcourse work, and 912 or 36% holdmasters or other qualifying degrees/certificates. By type of institution,this same breakdown of faculty de-grees shows that: at the universities-

The revised policy recognizes theindividual missions, traditions andneeds of the various institutionsin the System.

59% have doctorates, 6% have mas-ters plus 90, 8% have masters plus45, and 27% have masters and other;and at the community colleges-15%have doctorates, 5% have mastersplus 90, 10% have masters plus 45,and 70% have masters and other.

By rank, the composite Systemfaculty are 19% professors, 25% as-sociate professors, 37% assistantprofessors, and 19% instructors.Within the universities as a group,24% are professors, 29% are assoc-iate professors, 34% are assistantprofessors, and 13% are instructors.At the community colleges, 2% areprofessors, 12% are associate pro-fessors, 45% are assistant profes-sors, and 41% are instructors.

At the June 25,1976, Board meet-ing, 250 faculty promotions withinthe System for 1976-77 were approv-ed. These promotions, 153 for uni-versity faculty and 97 for communitycollege faculty, are not reflected inthe preceding profiles and the sum-maries shown in Table 7 of the Ap-pendix to this report.

Also at the June meeting. theBoard awarded tenure status to 194System faculty members. This repre-sents 139 university and 55 com-mUnity college faculty whose perfor-mances were recognized as outstand-ing and meritorious of tenure statusat their institutions.

Policy on Academic Free-dom, Responsiblity, andTenure

One of the more significant a-chievements of the year by the Sys-tem was the adoption of a compre-hensive Policy on Academic Free-dom, Responsibility, and Tenure.

Adopted by the Board at its Junemeeting, the policy represents theculmination of more than a year ofstudy and deliberation of the imme-diate and long-range needs of theSystem institutions for a revisedBoard policy concerning academictenure. The existing policy had beenfound to be inadequate in the extentand clarity of its provisions. Therevised policy was developedthrough a number of discussiondrafts which were disseminated forcomments by System administratorsand faculty and other interested per-sons and organizations. In addition,the revised policy was influenced byChapter 839 of the Public Acts of1976, the tenure legislation affectingthe State University and CommunityCollege System of Tennessee.

Briefly stated, the revised policyrecognizes the individual missions,traditions and needs of the variousinstitutions in the System, and pro-vides sufficient latitude for imple-mentation of the policy in the man-ner appropriate to each institution.Further, the policy emphasizes theprinciples of academic freedom andresponsibility as the foundations forall institutional policies and proce-dures concerning academic tenure.The actual provisions of the policyencompass: the definition of tenurestatus, minimum tenure eligibilityrequirements, the maximum proba-tionary period of tenure eligibility,general criteria for tenure recom-mendations, and the types of con-duct which may constitute adequatecause for the dismissal of a tenuredfaculty member. Procedural guide-lines for many of the provisions areincorporated in the statement.

The policy affords each institution

11

14

the prerogative and responsibility todevelop its own tenure policy withinthe minimum and maximum para-meters of the Board's standards.

Tenure and Promotion StudyDuring 1975-76, the System con-

ducted a study on faculty promotionand tenure patterns. Related to, yetseparate from the study that led tothe Board's policy on AcademicFreedom, Responsibility, and Ten-ure, this study was initiated byBoard directive in April, 1975. Thepurpose of the study was to discernthe possible effects on the institutionswhich may be realized as a result offaculty promotion and tenure trendsover a period of time. The basis ofthe study consisted of an analysis ofthe staffing plans of all System divi-sion/defertMerit chairpersons whichprojected percentages of faculty hav-ing tenure and achieving each rankto the year 2000.

The completed study, whichproved to be a major undertakinginvolving all key academic personnelin the System, was presented to theBoard at its June 25, 1976 meeting.The principle report finding was thatproper staff planning will hopefullypreclude the possibility of imposingtenure and rank quotas within thederwqments of the System institu-tions. The Board accepted the studyreport and suggested that it be up-dated on a periodic basis.

Grant-In-AidDuring 1975-76, nineteen facul-

ty at eight of the institutions. wereawarded Grant-In-Aid to pursue ad-vanced degrees. The tuition and liv-ing allowances granted to the ten

...The Board supports the positionthat faculty should be involved inpublic service and continuing ed-ucation activities sanctioned bytheir institutions.

During the 1975-76 fiscal year.nearly 200,000 volumes wereadded to the System's libraries.This represents an eigbt percentincrease which brings the totalnumber of volumes to over 2.5million.

university and nine community col-lege facultY totaled 582,289, rangingfrom $570 to 58.500 per individual.These allowances went to defray theexpenses of study periods rangingfrom two to twelve months. Thesuccess of these individuals in furtherdeveloping their credentials and pro-fessional skills strongly supports thegrant-in-aid program as a viablemeans of faculty and institutionaldevelopment.

The Board's policy on Grant-In-Aid was revised at the March 5. 1976,meeting. to further strengthen itsintent and utility. The specific provi-sion which was revised addresses theneed to set priorities for the awardingof grant-in-aid. As revised, the policynow states that the institutions' re-commendations for faculty grant-in-aid must be limited to faculty seekinga terminal degree, and priority consi-deration should be given to requestsfrom minority and female personnel,tenured faculty, and faculty of de-partments in which the institutiondesires further development.

Extra Compensation PolicyAt the March 5. 1976, meeting,

the Board adopted a policy on extracompensation for System facultywhich revised a former statementconcerning this area. In this revisedpolicy. the Board supports the posi-tion that faculty should be involvedin public service and continuing edu-cation activities sanctioned by theirinstitutions, and recognizes that whilemany of these activities may be con-ducted by the faculty as part of theirregular assignments, occasions arisewhere these activities are performedas extra assignments. The policy

addresses the general provisions foradditional compensation due whenthese activities are a matter of extraassignment.

In essence, the general provisionsof the new policy encompass theapplicable activies, personnel eligibi-lity, and maximum limits for extracompensation. The exclusion of sum-mer and intersession activities forconsideration as extra compensationand the maximum extra compensa-tion at twenty percent of the indivi-dual's regular academic year salaryas policy provisions signify theBoard's determined efforts to upgradethe compensation standards for Sys-tem faculty.

In separate action at the samemeeting, the Board also addressedits concern to upgrade the summerand intersession compensation provi-sions for faculty. Noting the pressingfiscal constraints at present, the Boardadopted a resolution authorizing thefuture development of a compensa-tion schedule for these additionalactivities which will be based on apercentage of the faculty member'sacademic year salary.

At the close of 1975-76, pro-gress was made toward fulfilling thecharge of this resolution. Board andcampus staffs had explored variousalternatives for the replacement ofthe current summer and intersessioncompensation schedule in which suchcompensation is determined solelyby rank.

Libraries

The libraries of the System institu-tions continued to grow in size andscope during 1975-76. Emphases weregiven to improving the holdings and

12

15

upgrading the resource services ren-dered. Such activities included therefinement and implementation ofsophisticated cataloging and refe-rence systems and the developmentof systematic control procedures.Further progress was made in theinter-library sharing programs whichafford each campus the benefits ofaccess to unique offerings of sisterinstitutions' libraries.

During the 1975-76 fiscal year,nearly 200,000 volumes were addedto the System libraries. This repre-sents an 8% increase which bringsthe total number of volumes to over2.5 million. The total holdings inmicrotext increased by 180,000 or10% over the year, bringing the totalnumber to over two million. A sum-mary of the holdings of System libra-ries, by institution, is included asTable 8 in the Appendix of this Re-port.

It is significant that relatively great-er growth took place in the commu-nity college libraries during the year.As a group, these libraries increasedsome 11% in volumes and 16% inmicrotext. This growth is in directrelation to the increases in studentenrollments and the continuing devel-opment at tile community colleges.

The libraries of the System assumewell over 700,000 square feet of space.Continued construction of library andlearning resource facilities during1975-76 reflect the ongoing need andconcern for providing students andfaculty with adequate library facilitieson all campuses. Two universitiesand two community colleges hadconstruction projects directly relatedto library facilities in various stagesof progress at the close of the fiscalyear: Memphis State had work com-

The Board of Regents approvedonly thirteen new programs ateight of the institutions.

pleted on its Learning ResourcesCenter and was in the process ofdeveloping plans for library expan-sion; Tennessee State's new librarybuilding and Chattanooga StatesLearning Resources Center were inprocess of construction; and theStudent Services and Learning Re-sources Center at Walters State wasin the planning stage.

Academic ProgramDevelopment

In the areas of System activity thatmay be termed as academic programdevelopment, the prevailing emphas-es of 1975-76 were on reassessment,redesign, and priorities. Energies wereexpended more toward reworkingand revitalizing the existing degreeprograms and academic units to meetidentified needs of campus interests,than toward seeking totally new pro-grams and alternatives. Only wherenew programs were in extreme de-mand did such action take place.The changes in degree designations,program areas, and academic unit.Sthat were made emerged from tho-rough study and consideration of thelong-range, as well as the immediateeffects. Achievements in themselves,the responsive actions of the Systemduring 1975-76, stand as the footingsfor future trends in academic pro-gram development.

New Degrees and Programs

Over the course of the 1975-76year, the Board of Regents approvedonly thirteen new programs at eightof the institutions. Four of the newprograms were at two of the univer-

sities, and nine were at six of thecommunity colleges. Of the new pro-grams, one was on the masters level.one was a bachelors program. sevenwere associate degree programs, andfour of the programs lead to certifi-cates of proficiency. In addition tothese free-standing programs, theBoard authorized five new programoptions at two of the community col-leges.

The new degree programs as out-lined in Table 9 of the Appendix tothis report, include: the MBA atTennessee Technological University;the B.S. in Education, A.S. in Secreta-rial Science, and A.A. in AdvertisingArt at Austin Peay State University:A.S.'s in Engineering and EngineeringTechnology at Mot low State Com-munity College: the A.S. in PoliceScience and Criminology Educationat Roane State Community College;the A.S. in Fire Science Technologyat Walters State Community College;the A.A.S. in Insurance Administra-tion and the Certificate in FamilyServices at Shelby State CommunityCollege; the Certificate in DentalAs.sisting Technology at VolunteerState Community College; and Certi-ficates in Respiratory Therapy Tech-nology and Real Estate at ClevelandState Community College.

All of the new degrees, programs,and program options represent theinstitutions' responses to needs analy-ses for such educational opportunitieswithin their service areas as well astheir abilities to meet such needs withavailable resources. Further, the reali-zation of the new programs involvedthe close working relationships ofcampus faculty and staff, Board staff,and the Tennessee Higher EducationCommission staff in developing andevaluating the program proposals.

13

16

The Board also approved a numberof changes in academic units at theSystem institutions duriug the 1975-76 year, as shown in Table 9 of theAppendix. Such changes entailed theredesignation and consolidation ofdegree programs, renaming of aca-demic departments, and major reor-ganization of the academic affairsstucture at one university. In manyof these instances, the primary rea-sons for change addressed concernsfor internal efficiency, consistencywith overall trends in higher educa-tion, and accrediting agency recom-mendations.

Policy on Degree Require-ments

At its June 25, 197(.. ilt:-Ang, theBoard adopted a polky on DegreeRequirements which sets forth mini-mum hour requirements and distribu-tive requirements for all students inthe System institutions undertakinga baccalaureate degree or associatedegree designed for transfer purposes.The policy statement represented theculmination of a twenty-month study,initiated by Board directive and in-volving Board staff and key academicpersonnel at all of the institutions.As adopted. the policy will becomeeffective for freshmen students enter-ing a System institution in the 1977,fall term.

A significant step in Board action,the policy addresses the institutions'differing philosophies of general edu-cation requirements and recognizesthe variances as reflections of theunique missions, program scopes,student types, and other factors com-posing the institutions' characters.However, to the end of enhancingeffective articulation of students be-tween System institutions while assur-

As of December 1975, fourteenTennessee students had enrolledSoutheastern universities in grad-uate programs not available inTennessee, and forty-seven stu-dents from ten southeast statesentered Tennessee to enroll inprograms of unique nature.

ing that students in the baccalaureateand associ-ate transfer degree pro-grams have been exposed to broadcurricular areas, the Board enacteda policy of minimum requirementswhich are to be incorPorated eitheras part of an institution's generaleducation policy or as part of institu-tional dettree requirements or as acombination of both.

The major thrust of the policy istwo-fold. First, it provides that allbaccalaureate degrees require a mini-mum of 192 quarter hours (128 se-mester credit hours), and all associatedegrees shall require a minimum of96 quarter credit hours. Second, itprovides that each student studyingfor . a baccalaureate degree or anassociate degree designed for transferpurposes shall complete, as part ofthe total level-one credits earned,not less than 45 quarter (32 semester)credit hours of level-one course workcomposed of distributive credit hoursin English Composition, Humanities.American History, Natural/Physical ,SciencesiMathematics. and PhysicalEducation Activities.

.Representative of the collectiveefforts and input by all major aca-demic components of the System,this,.policy supersedes the degreerequirements designed by the State

..Board of Education which had served.as curricular policy for the Systemuntil this time.

Academic Common Market

The Academic Common Marketcontinued to provide Tennessee stu-dents and Tennessee universities withopportunities and shared resourcesduring fiscal 1976. Gaining in recog-

.,..nition, this interstate exchange pro-,. AAgram of graduate students. sponsored

by the Southern Regional EducationBoard, yielded a fecord number ofparticipants in Tennessee. As of De-cember, 1975. fourteen Tennesseestudents had enrolled at Southeasternuniversities in graduate programs notavailable in Tennessee, and forty-seven students from ten southeaststates entered Tennessee to enrollin programs of unique nature. EastTennessee State University's Environ-mental Health Program continuedto attract the largest number of out-of-state graduate students under theauspices of the Academic CommonMarket. Twenty-one such studentsenrolled in this program and enjoyedthe waiver of non-resident tuitionfees, an integral facet of the CommonMarket.

East TennesseeState UniversityCollege of Medicine

The College of Medicine madesubstantial progress during 1975-76,despite some rather formidable handi-caps. The failure of the medicaleducation accrediting associations toissue a "Letter of Reasonable Assur-ance" caused the further impound-ment of allocated federal funds aswell as the impediment of full opera-tion. However, the College, the Uni-versity, and the Board staff workedto overcome these problems and bythe close of the year, all publishedrequirements for the "Letter" weremet and the prospects for its achieve-ment within the next year are en-couraging.

As part of the overall effort tomake the College of Medicine areality, a special consultant to theChancellor for medical affairs was

14

17

appointed early in the fiscal year.Dr. Lamar Soutter, a nationally recog-nized figure in Medical Educationand former Dean of the Boston Uni-versity and University of Massachu-setts Colleges of Medicine, was ap-pointed to serve in this capacity. Dr.Soutter's assistance proved to be ofgreat value in the detailed planning,staffing, and development of theETSU College of Medicine.

The significant activities at theCollege for the year related primarilyto preparation for full operation,expected in Fall 1978. The searchfor a new Dean was launched withmany qualified applicants being consi-dered. The Residency Centers atKingsport and Bribtol have been ac-credited. The Kingsport Center is inoperation. The Bristol Center is being"brought on line"; physical facilitiesare being completed and a basic staffis on assignment. Graduate programsin the life sciences were :eadied forsubmission to the Board for approval.A third residency center has beenproposed and research is underwayusing sophisticated laboratories. Stafflecruitment progressed, with totalassignments of 35 faculty and 13 staffmembers at the close of the year.

Public Serviceand ContinuingEducation

Public Service and Continuing Ed-ucation are integrated parts of iheacademic responsibilities of each ofthe sixteen institutions of the System.Each college and university has aclearly defined administrative unitfor the management and supervisionof public service and continuing edu-cation activities. As a matter of rule

The community colleges increas-ingly extended the classroom toneighboring off-campus locations.At these locations the older, part-time students are allowed the con-venience of attending regularcollege classes at locations onlyminutes from their work or home.

and practice, these services are per-formed by the institutions' regularacademic faculty or by adjunct facul-ty approved by the appropriate aca-demic unit. Public Service and Con-tinuing Education are, therefore,considered as extensions of facultyservices to students, as individualsand groups, at times and places out-side the assumed principal respon-sibility of laboratory and classroomteaching.

During the 1975-76 year, the com-munity colleges increasingly extendedthe classroom to neighboring off-cam-pus locations. At these locations, theolder, part-time, employed studentsare allowed the convenience of at-tending regular college classes atlocations only minutes from theirwork or home. Such classes, requir-ing no special lab equipment andoccassional student visits to thecampus library, are scheduled as apart of the regular insitutional pro-gramming. These classes are mak-ing highereducationmoreaccessibieto a large segment of our population.

Additionally, university off-campuscenters and extended service loca-tions have similarly responded toTennesseans who need and desireuniversity services. An environmentfavorable to learning at the off-cam-pus locations is explained in part bythe absence of extended student tra-vel. Relief from the pressures of ademanding time schedule necessita-ted by travel time to distant universitycampuses contributed significantlyto off-campus popularity in 1975-76.A sample listing of the university andcommunity college off-campus in-struction locations is included asTable 10 in the Appendix of this re-Port.

Credit activities in off-campus loca-tions have become an accepted andexpected part of the institutions'instructional programs and indica-tions are that these expectations willcontinue on an increased basis inthe future. (It is worthy of note thatclose to 8% of degree-credit studentsin the System attended a majority oftheir classes at off-campus locations.This represents over 6,400 students).

Non-credit educational experiencesbecame an increasingly importantpart of public service and continuingeducation in System institutions dur-ing the 1975-76 academic year. Thereis every indication that non-crediteducation will continue in its popu-larity in both the universities andthe community colleges in comingyears. During 1975-76, eleven of theinstitutions had staff identified asresponsible for non-credit education.As more professional organizationsand agencies turn to non-credit andContinuing Education Unit (CEU)activities for professional in-serviceand retraining activities, demands onnon-credit education will increase.The universities and community col-leges are better prepared for thisinevitability through experiencesgained dtiring 1975-76.

The iostitutions followed the re-commendations of regional and na-tional accrediting organizations anddeveloped guidelines for assuringquality in non-credit offerings during1975-76. Institutional guidelines weredeveloped and enacted on eleven ofthe campuses and are in the processof development at the remaining fiveinstitutions. Standard IX of the South-ern Association of Colleges andSchools has been accepted as thecriterion for programming in all the

15

18

community colleges and universitiesand was evident in 1975-76 activities.Future plans will continue to utilizeand incorporate Standard IX guide-lines in program improvement efforts.

One of the phenomenons of non-credit education is the willingnessof individuals and client groups topay participation fees that often ex-ceed by several times those fees paidfor similar credit offerings. Specialclient requested and supported non-credit courses during 1975-76 weredirected toward participants' needsand personal desires. These noncreditactivities were organized and spon-sored by the institutions and sup-ported in their entirety through client-paid fees. Such client-paid activitiesoffered a wealth of community be-nefits and opportune outlets for facul-ty desires for community service.

A summary, of public service andcontinuing education activities takenfrom the 1975-76 institutional annualreports, and from individually pre-pared public service annual reports,reflect the following examples of acti-vities:

Regular campus creditcourses offered at off-campus locatkins.

CEU awarded courses,conferences and institutes,both on-campus and off-campus.

Regular non-credit cour-ses, conferences, institutes,and consultive services of-fered to special client groupssuch as civic, social, businessand professional groups.

Special request non-creditactivities to fulfill other agen-cies' accreditation guidelines,such as programs for clients

Mr. Dwight Henry, a senior atTennessee Technological Un-iversity, was appointed as the firstStudent Regent for fiscal year1975-76.

of American Bar Associa-tion, American Institute ofBanking. Tennessee NursingAssociation, TennesseeAssociation of Realtors,American Dental Associa-tion. and others.

Local government trainingactivities in cooperation withthe Center for GovernmentTraining, University of Ten-nessee, Tennessee Correc-tions Institute. The Munici-pie League and local govern-mental agencies.

Special consultive andtraining services to business,industry, the professions andcivic and-social agencies.

Cooperative educationprograms with business, in-dustry, education and gov-ernment.

Consortiumarrangementsbetween the institutions andother institutions or agenciesin the areas of criminal jus-tice. health education, publicschool education and recrea-tional services.

A catalog of special cour-ses and activities for indivi-duals .and groups of indivi-duals which may be catego-rized as skill building ac-tivities, special needs activi-ties and enrichment activi-ties:

Services to special govern-mental groups. Eramples arethe Development Districts,Veterans Administration,Department of Corrections,Department Of VocationalRehabilitation. Commissionon Aging. Commission. onTourisM, Department of Edu-

cation, Tennessee Valley Au-thority, Alcoholic BeverageCommission, Department ofEmployment Security, De-partment of Mental Health,Department of PublicHealth Department of Safe-ty, Tennessee Higher Educa-tion Commission and others.

Plans for the 1976-77 academicyear are for continued emphases inpublic service to groups and agencies,with sensitivities and response to theneeds and desires of individuals.

Student LifeFiscal 1976 was a period in which

student participation and influencein System-wide actions affecting stu-dent life on the campuses reachednew and significant levels. It was alsoa period of reassessment and respon-sive efforts by the Board in addressingthe concerns of students that fallwithin the purview of Board policy.On the campus level, student person-nel services continued to provideintegral, co-curricular services tofoster the total development of allstudents.

Perhaps the most significant eventof the year with respect to the in-terests of student affairs was theplacement of a student as a memberof the Board of Regents. Mr. DwightHenry, a senior at Tennessee Tech-nological University, was appointedas the first Student Regent for fiscalyear 1975-76. Mr. Henry well fulfilledhis responsibilitieias a voting Boardmember in presenting the views andconcerns of the student in Boardconsiderations. He did much in theway of communicating the actionsof the Board on all of the campusesand to the various student groups.

16

19

His performance has set desirableprecedents for future Student Re-gents.

Fiscal 1976 was also the first yearfor student participation on theBoard's Standing Committees. Eightstudents from among the institutionswere appointed as members in thisvital, decision-making capacity. Theirinput and opinions played a majorrole in the success and effectivenessof the Committee's deliberations.

During .1975-76, students were alsoinvolved in System Task Force assign-ments regarding two prevailing stu-dent life concerns. The task forceapproach was selected to study andrecommend possible changes in theBoard policies on residence hall visita-tion and alcoholic beverages on cam-pus. Both of these issues had attractedconsiderable debate by students onthe campuses over the course of pastyears. It was in response to the ex-pressed desires of the campus com-munities that the current policies inthese areas be reviewed that separatetask forces, composed of Systemstudents, faculty, student personneladministrators, and alumni, werecreated.

The existing Board policy on alco-holic beverages on campus prohibitsthe sale, possession, and use of alco-holic beverages on all institutionalproperties. In studying the primaryand related effects of this policy, theassigned task force solicited inputfrom all segments of the campuscommunities, local and state officials,and the general public. Surveys, peti-tions, and student and public hearingswere used in this effort. By the endof 1975-76, this task force was in theprocess of consolidating responsesand formulating its final report andrecommendation. Their presentation

The policy's broad guidelinesprovide minimum standards to beimplemented to ensure that allstudents' rights to privacy andsecurity are safeguarded.

The institutions shall ensure thatequal opportunity and nondiscrim-ination exist for all students inall programs and activities.

of findings and policy considerationsis expected early the next fiscal year.

The Task Force on Residence HallVisitation used much the same tactin fulfilling their charge to study andrecommend changes in the existingBoard policy which sets forth ratherstrict guidelines for the hosting ofvisitors in the university dormitories.Resulting from the Task Fome's finalreport and recommendations present-ed at the June 25, 1976 meeting ofthe Board, a revised policy statementon Residence Hall Visitation wasconsidered and adopted by theBoard.

Residence Hall VisitationPolicy

This revised policy adopted by theBoard during 1975-76 thrusts theresponsibility for developing equi-table visitation provisions for studentsliving in the university dormitorieson the institutions themselves. Thepolicy's broad guidelines provideminimum standards to be implement-ed to insure that all students' rightsto privacy and security are safe-guarded. Pursuant to the provisionsof the revised policy, one universityhad established a differential housingpolicy by the close of 1975-76. Theother five universities are developingsimilar plans to be implemented inthe next fiscal year.

A second Board policy concerningthe safeguarding of students rightswas adopted during the year. Consis-tant with the System's posture onequal opportunity in all facets ofcampus life, this policy statementaddresses primarily the recently a-dopted federal regulations of "TitleIX."

Policy on Nondiscriminationon the Basis of Sex in Edu-cation' Programs and Activ-iiiir

At its October 17, 1975, meeting,the State Board of Regents adopteda statement of policy and procedureson nondiscrimination in educationprograms and activities on the basisof sex. The purpose of the policy isto assist the institutions of the Systemin complying with Title IX of theEducation Amendments of 1972, per-tinent sections of the Public HealthService Act, and subsequent Regula-tions. As a matter of policy, thestatement provides that the institu-tions shall ensure that equal opportu-nity and nondiscrimination exist forall students in all programs and activi-ties such as recruitment and admis-sion, training, rules on student lifeactivities, housing, facilities, accessto course offerings, counseling, finan-cial assistance, employment assis-tance, health and insurance benefitsand services, rules on marital orparental status, and athletics. Thepolicy further provides correlativerefeVence to the provisions of theBoard's policy on Equal EmploymentOpportunity and Affirmative Action.

The procedural aspects of tnepolicy relate to the institutions' re-sponsibilities concerning the desig-nation of campus coordinators/offi-cers, implementation of grievanceprocedures, statement and dissemina-tion of the institutions' policies, andimplementation of self-evaluations.

Students services at the institutionscontinued to provide for the co-curricular needs and desires of stu-dents. In doing so, the variety ofactivities associated with student lifeexpanded and changed with the chang-

17

20

ing characteristics of the studentclienteles. The colleges and universi-ties emphasized the extension of theirstudent services to the non-tradition,commuter, off-campus students aswell as upgrading the conventional,campus life programs. Counseling,career advisement, Lyceum programs,orientation and informational serviceson campus activities, and intramuralathletics were reported by the institu-tions as major areas of interest, de-velopment, and growth in studentlife functions during the year.

As a system, the institutions' fiscal1976 current fund expenditures forStudent Services totaled over $13million. This total represents supportfor the services such as student acti-vities, cultural events, student news-papers, intramural athletics, studentorganizations, counseling and careerguidance, and student health services.

A considerable portion of the capi-tal projects in progress during fiscal1976 on the System campuses wasdirectly related to providing facilitiesfor student services and activities.Such projects which were completedduring the year were the WinfieldDunn Health and Physical EducationCenter at Austin Peay State Univer-sity and outdoor physical educationfacilities at Walters State CommunityCollege. Student service-orientedbuildings in progress at the clme ofthe year included the Student Centerand the Physical Education Complexat East Tennessee State Universityand the Health and Physical Educa-tion Building at Tennessee Techno-logical University. Projects of similarpurpose in the planning stages byJune 30, 1976, were the Student Cen-ter at Chattanooga State TechnicalCommunity College, completion ofthe Campus Center at Volunteer

Despite the Board of Regents'efforts to maintain student tuitionand fees as low as possible, therising costs of higher educationpresent a considerable expense,if not a burden, to many studentsand their families.

State Community College, and theStudent Services and Learning Re-sources Center at Walters State Com-munity College.

While all of the student affairsoffices perform vital services forstudent welfare and development, theFinancial Aid offices of the Systeminstitutions merit special mention dueto their outstanding.efforts under dif-ficult conditions. Despite the Boardof Regents efforts to maintain stu-dent tuition and fees as low as pos-slible, the rising costs of higher educa-tion present a considerable expense,if not a burden to many studentsand their families. To enable themany students who otherwise mightnot be in a position to seek a collegeeducation, all of the System institu-tions administer financial assistanceprograms under the direction of esta-blished Financial Aid offices. Facedwith limited resources and overwhelm-ing demands for assistance, theseoffices work to provide the greatestamount of aid to the greatest num-ber of eligible studen ts possible whilecounseling and advising the recipientsin budgeting and planning matters.

During 1975-76, financial assistancein amoums exceeding 522 millionwere made available to System stu-dents. An aggregate total number ofover 30,000 awards were made fromfederal, state, institutional, and pri-vate assistance sources. The awardsrepresent forms of scholarships,grants, fellowships, and loans. Of thetotal amount of assistance awardedduring the year, the amount of cur-rent funds expended by the Systemfor Scholarships and Fellowships ex-ceeded 53.6 million.

CampusDevelopment

The creation of a new Board staffarea with responsibilities for CampusPlanning and Facilities Developmentin 1975-76 marked the initiation of aformal System emphasis on compre-hensive planning as it relates to cam-pus building programs and the man-agement of facilities. Major advance-ments were made during the year inthis regard with the implementationof System-wide programs, studies,and analyses. These activities ad-dressed the elements of present andprojected campus needs in consider-ation of current and prospective capi-tal resource avaiiabilities. Immediateresults were realized from many ofthese efforts. A number of the acti-vities will have long-range impacts.The following are examples of theundertakings of the year which ad-dressed the concerns for effectivecampus development.

In the area of facility planning andbudgeting, a five-year capital improve-ment planning process was developedand implemented during 1975-76. Asa planning process, each institutionprojected its capital needs and fund-ing requirements for a five-year per-iod. In essence, the first year of theplan became the budget request forthe institution. The plan and relatedbudget will be reviewed and updatedon an annual basis.

Also during the year, a comprehen-sive analysis of campus space needsthrough the 1980s was conductedand completed. This analysis is repre-sentative of extensive research andstatistical application. By computingthe space requirements of projected

18

enrollments and expected trends indiscipline interests, this informationwas used as a basis for developingcapital improvement budgets andlong-range plans. In comparing exist-ing space by functional use to theprojected space needs, "high need"institutions have been designated. Onthe basis of this analysis, capitalbudget recommendations for newfacilities have been and will continueto be made. Notably, the "high growth"trend in the community colleges pre-sents the primary System target forcapital improvement. Additionally,special purpose facility needs havebeen identified in the universities.

Related to the development of thefive-year capital improvement plan-ning process and the results of thespace needs analysis, efforts werefurther directed during 1975-76 torefine the existing campus masterplans at all of the institutions, withspecial attention being given to thecommunity colleges" designated fornew constniction. Considered essen-tial to efficient and effective program-ming, a comprehensive campus mas-ter plan was completed for Chatta-nooga State Technical CommunityCollege. Efforts were also initiatedto develop similar plans for WaltersState Community College, RoaneState Community College, VolunteerState Community College, and ShelbyCommunity College.

With regard to growing concernsabout the state of existing facilitieson college and university campuses,four separate yet related activitieswere undertaken during the year.First, a comprehensive system 'forconstruction management supervi-sion was installed. Second, a com-prehensive analysis was conducted

palldde pue Paleigam gq SUOIle -iac10 sndcueo josmatuap Sutssedwoo

-U Lp jo spuan )sEd Dip 'Os 21.110p

UI TamnpueliOadns pue .aavuas 3ll -qnd 'goieasai 'uon384s18 joj suonoaf -oid auni-guol &New UI SU09111I1SU!

Dip ls!sse !HA% qopila sulD)sAs uo!) 1U011103EUBUI pue 'spodar

'sainpaooid Stqdoianap jo asodiud mecumn aql Epp% paaleqo rn sleumn

-!Pu! aSatp `D3i0J Ise) sy luatu -cloianap A)1110q pue 'aoueug pug 'ssau!snq Itqsmoid Emp UUUC

'Si !Eng 3!Ulape 3e JO spin! atil asplatha glva jju)s !mow) PuE

pieog" ai oiod lsEj jo siaq -Luau pangodde uaADs Du, pOlED-13

sem aalog Sj 21guueld LuD)sAs E

9L-SL6I gu!-InP sum)! IIIIImumg -aid pun SUIUUEN Oni5uOlpich1103

Jo quaoiSmo Imo) E )1muldolanap sruhuE3 aifith O .10jja DpiM-LuDlsAs

ag) jo uone.nsuowap Jag linJ UI 'DSolioD 4unulcuo3

ams engem 1B iDluaD saamosag 811!

-weal pue sa0IMas juapEls DIP PUB

`aSallop SmununuoD D)Els nwurlIOA pug aSallop Amununuop a)els aueoN

)e aumims noloupai, `02DII0D 4ununuoD le3nnioDj Dms eSoou

-uneto )e Jawap )uaprns alp `AMsIDA

ams aassauuai ally% 38 )1181d

Sump pre &meat' :alam palemm wag peg samnpoe )uatudoianap pug

panRucuoo uaaq peg 28,punj tp!qm .10.1 Sampej Mau ata 02En 51..qu

Amid am Li! aIDM `000'96.93 fftmelo)

s)aSpnq tyva saSailoo A)!IIIIUM103

DALT pue samsiangin gaup J sPaf uaaultp `c:L6I 'pi jo sY

sawn watudo lanecipulutteta sparom

.aSanop A),uncuulop ams Aqpgs 1B II asetidsndweD

uraolpm at!) pue :D2D03 411111U

-U103 le 3Iu113ai MIS P200UMMILD

janlap saoinosaN fftquleal Qtp tA)!S

iA!Ufl Dre)s Dassalluai )8 Anicin pue `21qpung uonE-ns!ligupy ssau

'aollap,sps sylansaid alp ;Am wpm ams ggsSOUUDI )Sea )E )(Did

..woD uope3npg lEo!sAtid DEB pue Ja) -uaD )uapnIs :wan% kloSmE3 s!tp

npurl s&gpunq mat' °ELL -sD!)III0e.1 supspcD 0) SUOMPOE PEE sanmorj

ma)) DAIOAII!

sp2prICI iew) tp!m '50atojd DsDta 1.10POICILUO3 JO SOSEIS SUPCIEA sasnd

.°°°:M`6CS 3°

Aueo DaDII03 1WILUt1103 Omi AmS

- 3afald llaatmoj alaM jam rl un iOj UO

9L61 re3SI1 J° Ds°13 Iy

aassauuai, )e lueld U43 fenuaD DLI) O sluatuaAoldtu! Ienuelsqns Imo

:AmsiaARlf) a)Eis sUFILEDN )8 511,pllng uopuilsmemy ag) Jo U011emmia.1

Dql :1(1!SIOA!Ufl DIMS °°55DUIIDI )seg 1B IPH LPealcmp Jo uopEnoual alp

amis Avad unsny )8 Jai ..u031109e311pg leo!sAIld Pue LoreaH

uunia PPUtivik alp :Dm Dlou imoads clue pa)aldwoo DJQM

s33groid asotu TUOPEA0Uaj iofeW !NIB '091113E.1 gE1)51X0 O SUOISED)XO

'5DMIPEJ MOE JOJ 000'gc9'CIS )ag _pnq anneincurm e )uasaidaa oafald

DsDILL "PD1DIdl.U00 DiDitt Sasnchueo a2D110.° 4uncucuoo DIP Jo inoj puE

Arslannin alp Jo uo siOarojd aanp ..Aluam] Jo [MI '9L-SL6I 2upnia

papIclum3 sOefoid 'quDfoid asaq)

jo ma!nai japg r 5 SuPaolioj .9L-SL6I ffuprip ulDlsXS DIP uniwn

ssajSoid Jo saSe)s snOPEA aqi 11! spDfald lel!deu j0 AIMUDAUI EE MPS

-OA liOdON sm) JO X!PUOddy NI LI!

Z1 DICRI, 'ItzawdopADP Pue ipmoiS .10.1 sPPDE Alp01.1d JO am 1Ewasaid

pie PAISuma DIDM suoprimsu!

few pue segmaei Sunspca al suoistimxa

.sapwael mall JO/ 000"9Ev'e Jo la5Pnq annelnuma e ivasardej

spaprd asew Re,aldiuoa ajam sesndwea afielloa ifi!ununuoa 0q3

jo 001 pue ifjrgreigun ay; Jo a/ty c/0 spelord Gann-Miami 10 lam te

cuDnics Dip JO Sasnduma gm U0 %Ilea 211101!IN 9L-gLea le111°E

'Magi -ojd ametiaMetu .10fetu aznInj amp

iHm 5uOpepUDUILUO3ailUellE5UO3

JO UO!dOp ULp paledppliE Si scua)sics Swung anpalla puEluOlo

'MD 1900 Stqpuacutuooai Jo pua aq) pieraol weld Sumpnq o sisAieue Lppe,

Paieqo DIDM SlUelIns1103 *SIODfald

UopaeASUO3 Mall .10few UO SU insuoo stsAirue )soo pug apAoajll jo

luauaoldcua pagontg uono8 cualsAs

palrgai-aoueuallgetu 1/1.17101 ata .suraIsAs OUUUflW DM1UDADId pue

luatuaSeuecu SUOIMIadO SUIIIMS11!

suopnmstq Sups!sse mou OJE SBE)s 2UMnSUO3 pun pieog -suopeiado

NEN Joj sluacuaqnbaj plug IEl!dE3

pue aupeiado 5Inonpa1 pue Anap -UP IumuaSeuecu 2u!seanu! Jo an!)

-oafqo aqi piemol umjsi(s luatuagE -uecu suopeiado pue nuasAs aMIEUal -U!eui anpuanaid U0 padopnap Diam

sieumas -sasnchum Lj uo stuglaoid watua5eueul suopmado pue aMIEUal

-UW S

ainpuanaid jo &mount"' aq) SEM

9 6 Stqinp uale) Lippe 111D1sAs

pmeiw-auueua)u!euz pi! ip 041 le3su )xau ag) tqq)!At Su!

-punj aApODI pya mafoid Osatp lem padog lj -sasndtueo itpa uo maul

-anoRkui sndcueo pue aoueualu!etu iofew joj padolanap iM suonepuaw

-11.103aiSumunj tuopeuguialap asaql Wag guTurtuals TI3afoid ameumulutu

jorecu pue IMPEAOUDJ jo paau ale suonnwsu! [ppm% paunuaapp SeM

qsAieue qtp jo s!seq ag) up -uo!ssge -cuoD uopeonpa iatiSm aaSSOUlla

Dip pue 'SSUL1j jo Sm.iamun, tp 13D),Epiy awls am 'uonnIpstqe LjO

'pie% plp JO Sant1eluasaidai nen IPPA ua31.103 patumpad sem ADAMS

wss HE -sp!qpinq'sjuoOLTIT!lpsuuL

Lj unuialop

It was ultimately through effectiveplanning and budgeting that 1975-76 was a year. of overall Systemprogress despite the many ob-sticles posed by inflation, in-creases in cgsts, and tepid fund-ing.

to future expectations and objectiVes.The end results of the Planning TaskForce's activities will serve as thebases for all comprehensive planningand plan implementation campus ef-forts.

At the close of the year, the Plan-ning task Force had made significantprogress in discerning the nature ofthe data necessary to meeting theirobjectives. It is expected that theircontinuing work in the next year willgreatly enhance the planning aspectsof campus development within theSystem.

Businessand Finance

During a period of limited resourc-es and expanding demands for ser-vice, it was the efforts related to fiscalmanagement that assumed the great-est responsibilities for providing bal-ance and development within theSystem. It was ultimately througheffective planning and budgeting that1975-76 was a year of overall Systemprogress despite the many obstaclesposed by inflation, increases in costs,and tepid funding. The commitmentsof the Board, the Board staff, andthe institutions were totally account-able for the success of the System inmeeting its obligations while main-taining high levels of quality in alloperations.

Fiscal1976 was a year of austerityfor the System in many regards. Fiveof the sixteen institutions were forcedto draw upon reserves in order tomaintain balanced budgets and toprovide their expected services. Oneinstitution, Shelby State, was forcedto limit enrollments. Roane State andChattanooga State had to postpone

initiating programs due to the short-age of funding. Overall, salary increas-es for System personnel averagedonly 2.5 percent. This was in accord-ance with direct legislative mandateand the guidelines of the Departmentof Finance and Administration. Costsaving efforts, including cutbacks insupplies and equipment purchases,reductions in energy utilization, andoverall tightening of general expendi-tures were implemented.

The financial statements includedas Tables 13, 14, and 15 in the Appen-dix of this report detail the System'smanagement of resources in meetingits responsibilities. Explanatory notesprecede these statements for clarifi-cation. The following are selectedhighlights and uses of the System'sresources.

The total current fund revenue ofthe System increased from$150,067,231 in fiscal 1975 to$160,162,279 in fiscal 1976 or 6.7%.State operating appropriations in-creased from $78,294,818 to$83,548,701. It should be noted thatwhile this represents an increase of6.7%, the impoundment of 5% offiscal 1975 funding causes this com-parison to misrepresentative. Theactual increase in allocated tax dollarsof fiscal 1976 from fiscal 1975 priorto the impoundment is 3.7%. Therelative percentage of this source ofrevenue remained the same fromfiscal 1975 to 1976 at 52.2% of totalrevenues. Revenues from studenttuition and fees increased from527,071,898 to $31,536.566 or 16.5%.Revenue from this source increased.in relative percentage from 18% ofthe total in fiscal 1975 to 19.7% ofthe total in fiscal 1976. This increase,however, was primarily offset by a

20

1.2% relative decrease in federalsupport for appropriations and grantsand contracts.

The total current fund expendi-tures and mandatory transfers of theSystem increased from $148,305,991in fiscal 1975 to $156,710,815 in fiscal1976 or 5.7%. The relative percentageexpended for Instruction increasedfrom 40.7% to 41.1% of the totalexpenditures and transfers. Operationand Maintenance of Plant assumedthe greatest relative increase, from9.5% of the total in fiscal 1975 to10.5% of the total in fiscal 1976. Thisis due to the trend of abnormal infla-tionary increases in the costs of utili-ties and maintenance supplies. Thelargest relative decrease in expen-ditures from fiscal 1975 to 1976 oc-curred in Scholarships and Fellow-ships where there was a decrease of1.2%, from 3.5% to 2.3% of the total.

Particular note is due to the bal-ance of fiscal 1976 revenues andexpenditures in Auxiliary Enterprises.The revenues of $21,407,247 exceed-ed the expenditures of $20,819,594.This is significant of determined ef-forts to make the Auxiliary Enter-prises self-supporting and to renderthese services as totally userspon-sored.

The total Investment in Plant in-creased. from $394,840,672 as of June30, 1975 to $422, 207,057 as of June30, 1976; an increase of $27,376,385or 6.9%. During this same period,indebtedness increased from$77,267,200 to $78,902,919; an in-crease of $1,635,719 or 2.1%. Includedin the indebtedness figure is the newbond issue by the Tennessee StateSchool Bond Authority of$32,149,791.88 for Board of Regentsuniversities which replaced tempo-rary financing.

One of the greatest achievementsduring'1975-76 was the initiationof a System-wide management pro-gram.

With regard to System efforts toimprove the management of busi-ness operations, 1975-76 was a periodof significant action. The adoptionof two Board policies addressing theoperational aspects of purchasing andthe approval of contracts during theyear.underlined the Board's respon-sibility to insure control in areaswhere need occurs, as well as itsprerogative to delegate authority tothe institutions. In both these in-stances, the policy statements setforth minimum standards, providingfor .institutional discretion, within thelinations of State law and regulations.

porchasiw Policies andprocedures

Adopted by the Board at its March5, .1976, meeting, this policy esta-blishes and clarifies the purchasingauthority of the institutions. Thepolicy specifies certain purchasingtrans,ctions which are not within, thedelegation of authority, provides forsafeguards in the areas of emergencypurchases and contracts, requires thedevelopment of institutional purchas-ing manuals, and provides for thecreation of a council of buyers torecommend possible uniform proce-dures, standard specifications, termcontracts and coordination of -pur-

and to develop a code ofchasing,ethics.policy on Approval of Agree-ments

This policy, also adopted at themarch 5, 1976, meeting, providesclarification of the types of agree-ments which are subject to the ap-proval of the Chancellor, and other-wise delegates certain contractingauthority to the presidents. The poli-cy Provides that all agreements con-cerning real estate, data processing

equipment, insurance, employee be-nefits, professional or consultive ser-vices, capital outlay projects, andcooperative or coordinated acadeMicprograms and activities, or academicmatters of System-wide affect, shallbe subject to approval by the Chan-cellor. All other agreements may beapproved by the president of aninstitution, subject to the standardsanci requirements of the policy.

Related to the concerns of soundbusiness management and the dele-gation of administrative responsibili-ties to the most appropriate level,personnel management at the cam-puses was also an area of Systemstudy and Board action during 1975--76. An extensive study was under-taken by Board staff and key institu-tional personnel on alternative proce-dures to improve the effectivenessand efficiency in campus level person-nel matters which currently involvedthe Board and Board staff. Followingthe study, a Board policy statementwas developed and at its June 25,1976, meeting, the Board adopted aGeneral Personnel Policy.

General Personnel Policy

This policy delegates to the presi-dents authority to administer generalpersonnel matters pursuant to theprovided guidelines in the areas of:appointment and employment of per-sonnel; the nature of the appointmentof personnel; compensation of em-ployees; changes of status and termi-nations of employees; non-discrimi-nation requirements; complaints con-cerning employment practices; andrecording and reporting requirements.

21

2 4

One of the primary effects of thepolicy was the elimination of a Systemsalary schedule affecting faculty and,administrative personnel which hadbeen utilized since the System wasin operation.

In the broadest sense of businessand resource management, one ofthe greatest achievements during1975-76 was the initiation of a System-wide management program. Adaptingthe principles of Management ByObjectives (MBO) to the uniquestructure and relationships within theSystem, this recognized approach toplanning and evaluation was imple-mented on the Board staff and presi-dential levels. Many presidents in turninitiated MBO systems on the secondand third levels of campusadministration.

Management By Objectives, asimplemented by the System, providesthe means whereby institutional goalsand objectives are defined, activityplanning is integrated, and prioritiesare established and communicated.The outcomes of this process areimproved planning and decision-making, effective utilization of re-sources, participative management,and the bases for objective evaluationof the results achieved.

The effectiveness and success en-joyed by the System from the use ofthe MBO concepts in the entire realmof administrative functions during thisinitial year of implementation insuresits continuation in the future.

APPENDICESTABLE

ACCREDITATION

ENROLLMENT

A Comparison of Fall 1974 and 1975 Degree-Credit Headcountand Full-Time Equivalent Enrollments

Fall 1975 Degree-Credit Headcount, by LevelFall 1975 Degree-Credit Headcount, by Age ParametersFall 1975 Degree-Credit Headcount, by Residence

GRADUATES

Degrees and Certificates Awarded, 1975-76

FACULTIES

Full-Time Faculty in Instruction, by Rank and Degree, 1975-76

LIBRARIES

Volumes and Microtext, 1975-76

CHANGES IN ACADEMIC UNITS

New Degree Programs, Program Consolidations and Redesignations, andOrganizational Unit Changes, 1975-76

OFF-CAMPUS LOCATIONS

,PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Net Assignable Square Feet of Space, June 30, 1976Construction in Planning/Development Stages, In Progress, and

Completed, June 30, 1976

FINANCE

Balance Sheet, June 30, 1976Statement of Current Funds, Revenue, Expenditures; and Other Changes,Statement of Changes in Fund Balances, 1975-76

1975-76

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

IZ

12

131415

Chart 1: Revenue, 1975-76Chart 2: Expenditures and Mandatory Transfers, 1975-76

22

2 5

Table 1ACCREDITATION

Accreditation is a vital foundation of an institution's educational offerings.Successful accreditation by a recognized association or agency is in itselfan end which reflects accomplishment and accountability. In addition, thevarious phases and procedures of accreditation represent beneficial means forcontinuous institutional and program improvement. The System is committed toregarding the accrediting standards and recommendations as criteria forconsiderations in program review and evaluation. Listed below are nationaland regional associations with which the institutions have earned accreditationstatus as of the close of the 1975-76 fiscal year.

Austin Peay State University

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsNational Association of Schools of MusicNational Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education

East Tennessee State University

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsAmerican Medical AssociationAmerican Speech and Hearing AssociationAmerican Chemical SocietyAmerican Dental AssociationNational Council for Accreditation of Teacher EducationNational League for NursingAssociation for Field Service in Teacher EducationNational Environmental Health AssociationCouncil on Social Work Education

Memphis State University

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsAmerican Psychological AssociationAmerican Speech and Hearing AssociationCouncil on Social Work EducationAmerican Association of Collegiate Schools of BusinessAmerican Chemical SocietyAmerican Bar AssociationAmerican Council of Education for JournalismEngineers' Council for Professional DevelopmentNational Association of Schools of MusicNational Council for Accreditation of Teacher EducationNational League for Nursing

Middle Tennessee State University

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsNational Association of Schools of MusicNational Council for Accreditation of Teacher EducationNhtional League for NursingAmerican Chemical Society

2 623

Tennessee State University

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsCouncil on Social Work EducationAmerican Dental AssociationEngineers' Council for Professional DevelopmentNational Association of Schools of MusicNational Council for Accreditation of Teacher EducationNational League for NursingAmerican Home Economics AssociationNational University Extension Association

Tennessee Technological University

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsAmerican Chemical SocietyEngineers' Council for Professional DevelopmentNhtional fissociation of Schools of MusicNhtional Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education

Chattanooga State Technical Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsEngineers' Council for Professional DevelopmentAmerican Dental Association

Cleveland State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsNational League for NursingAmerican Bar AssociationAmerican Dental Association

Columbia State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsNational League of NursingAmerican Medical AssociationAmerican Veterinary Medical AssociationMedical Laboratory Technology

Dyersburg State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools

Jackson State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsAmerican Medical AssociationNational Accrediting Agency for the Clinical Laboratory Sciences

Mbtlow State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsNational League of Nursing

2 7

Roane State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsAmerican Medical AssociationAmerican Medical Records Association

Shelby State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools

Volunteer State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsAmerican Dental AssociationAmerican Dietetic AssociationAmerican Medical Records AssociationAmerican Physical Therapist Association

Walters State Community College

Southern Association of Colleges and Sdhools

28

Table 2

A ONPARISCN OF FALL 1974 AND 1975

DEGREE-CREDIT STUDENT HEADCOUNT

MD FULL-TINE EQUATED ENROLLMENTS

Fall 1974 Fall 1975 Percent Fall 1974 Fall 1975 Percent

Headcount Headcount Change FTE FTE Clange

Austin Peal State University 3,918 4,160 6.2 3,299 3,461 4.9

East Tennessee State University 9,050 10,288 13 7 7,717 8,690 12.6

Nemphis State University 21,345 22,364 9 5 16,095 16,669 3.6

Niddle Tennessee State University 10,119 10,562 4.4 8,938 9,352 4.6

Tennessee State University 4,709 5,167 9.7 4,347 4,633 6.6

Tennessee Technological University 6,896 6,968 1.0 6,027 6,222 3.2

Sub Total_ 56,037 59,509 6.2 46,423 49,027 5.6

tsc43 Chattanooga State Technical

Comnity College 2,245 3,471 54.6 1,373 2,327 69.5

Cleveland State Community College 2,576 3,169 23.0 1,693 2,059 21.6

Columbia State 0:Immunity Cbllege 1,366 1,797 31.6 970 1,218 25.6

Dyersburg State COmmunity College 1,046 1,106 5.7 645 764 18.4

Jackson State Community College 1,834 2,186 19.2 1,125 1,478 31.4

Nbtlow State Community College 980 1.108 13.1 709 815 15.0

Roane State Comunity College 1,476 2,394 62.2 997 1,527 53.2

Shelby State Conminiity Cbllege 3,287 4,050 23.2 2,300 3,057 32.9

Vblunteer State Cbmnunity College 1,667 2,347 40.8 1,190 1,683 41.4

Walters State Comnunity College 1,927 2,877 49.3 1,249 1,949 56.0

Sub Total 18,404 24,505 33.1 12,251 16,877 37.8

Total 74,441 84,014 12.9 58,674 65,904 12.3

Sources: Fall 1974 Student Laformation System an

29Fall 1975 Student Information System

30 1')

DEGREE CREDIT STUDENT

BEADOET - BY LEVEL

FALL 1975

Freshmen Sophomore Junior

Austin Peay State University 1,445

Fast Tennessee State University 3,397

Memphis State University 4,817

Middle Tennessee State University 3,312

Tennessee State University 2,448

Tennessee Technological University 2,380

Sub Total 17,799

Chattanooga State Technical

Community College 2,923

Cleveland State Community College 1,591

Columbia State Comity College 1,327

Dyersburg State Community College 707

Jackson State Community College 1,704

Nbtlow State Community College 710

Roane State Commumity College 1,758

Shelby State Community College 3,137

Volunteer State Community College 1,840

Walters State Community College 1,865

Sub Total 17,562

Total 35,361

*Includes Graduate and Undergraduate Special

Source: Fall 1975 Student Information System

31

Table 3

Masters & Spec;

Senior in Education Doctoral Professional Special* To111_

975 750 413 492 -0- -0- 85 4,160

1,879 1,667 1 602 818 24 -0- 901 10,288

3,924 3,080 3,866 3,021 384 547 2,725 22,364

1,915 1,698 1,947 1,054 27 -0- 609 10,562

842 511 563 224 -0- -0- 579 5,167

1 352 1,003 1,189 628 10 -0- 406 6,968

10,887 8,709 9,580 6,237 445 547 5,305 59,509

368 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 180 3,471

773 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 805 3,169

466 -0- -0- -0- r0- -0- 4 1,797,

282 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 117 1,106'

482 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 2,186

324 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 74 1,108

542 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 94 2,394

617 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 296 4,050

470 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 37 2,347

536 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 476 2,877

4,860 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 2 083 24,505

15,747 8,709 9,580 6,237 445 547 7,388 84,014

Age Less

Than 24

DEGREE-CREDIT

Percent

of Total

Table 4

STUDER HEADCOUNT

BY AGE PARAMETER

Fa 1975

Age Percent Age Percent Age Percent Average Total

24-30 of,Total Over 30 of Total Not Given of Total Age Headcount

Austin Peay State University 2,742 65.9 822 19.8 596 14.3 24.2 4,160

East Tennessee State University 6,544 63.6 2,258 22,0 1,483 14.4 3 24.1 10,288

Memphis State University 12,412 55.5 6,395 28.6 3,557 15.9 25.0 22,364

Middle Tennessee State University 7,582 11.8 1,885 17.8 1,095 10.4 22.7 10,562

Tennessee State University 3,712 71.8 888 17.2 567 11.0. .

22.6 5,167

Tennessee Technological University 5,279 75.8 1,051 15.1 629 9.0 9 0.1 22.6 6,968

Sub Total 38,271 64.3 13,299 22.4 7,927 13.3 12 23.9 59,509

Chattanooga State Technical 1,717 49.4 960 27.7 794 22.9 25.8 3 471

Community College

Cleveland State Community College 1,547 48.8 731 23.1 891 28.1 27.0 3,169

Columbia State Community College 1,010 56.2 285 15.9 502 27.9.0

29,0 1,797 .

co

Dyersburg State Community College

Jackson State Comrunity College

522

1,107

47.2

50.7

271

523

24.5

23.9

313

556

28.3

25.4

- - NO 27.0

33.5

1,106

2,186

Motlow State Community College 642 58.0 202 18.2 264 23.8 27.3 1,108

Roane State Community College 1,120 46.8 602 25.1 672 28.1 27.5 2,394

Shelby State Comity College 2,042 50.4 1,134 28.0 874 21.6 25.8 4,050

Volunteer State Community College 1,198 51.1 486 20.7 663 28.2 27.6 2,347

Walters State Comunity College 1,254 43.6 717 24.9 906 31.5 29.7 2,877

Sub Total 12,159 49.6 5,911 24.1 6,435 26.3 27.9 24,505

Total 50,43014,5 19,210 22.9 14,362 17.1 12 25.1 84,014

Source: Fall 1975 Student Information System

3334

County

Anderson

Bedfbrd

Benton

Bledsoe

Blount

Bradley

Calopbell

Cannon

Carroll

Carter

Cheatham

Cnester

Claiborne

Clay

Cocke

Coffee

Crockett

Cumberland

Davidson

Decatur

DeKalb

Dickson

Dyer

Fayette

Fentress

Franklin

Gibson

Giles

Grainger

Greene

Grundy

Hamblen

Hamilton

Hancock

Hardeman

Hardin

Hawkins

Haywood

Henderson

Henry

Hickaul

Houston

APSU

8

1

21

18

1

1

10

25

8 3

Ersu msu

11 9

4

8

0

9 7

2 6

.2 0

1

28

84 1

2

26

3 0

1

10 3

14

42

3

4 273

14

0

10

68

76

1

7

113

13

1 0

62 1

1

14 5

10 93

1 3'

SS

60

36 3

68

28

21

4

5

DEGREE-CEDIT STUDENT HEADCOUNT

BY RESIDENCE

FALL 1975

MTSU TSU ITU CSTCC

66 11 188

352 14 23

3 0 2

9 0 92 1

36 5 60

68 2 41 2

9 0 48

129 0 8

CLC

1

1

2

1,40

Ccc DCC

0

16

11 2 1 8

1 1 2

23 3 8

3 4 4 4

2 0 6

22 5 119

0 1 11

497 3 115 54

9 4 0 3 8

24 1 270 3

2,435 2,580 664 4

0 1 5 3

85 0 95

60 17 35

18 8 10 57

7 62 4

11 0 159

223 11 58 25

32 30 12 6 34

153 9 11 6

0 0 7

6 1 26

45 0 24

6 0 29

492 117 175 3,01 56 1

0 0 2

S 36 1 9

16 6 1 3

1 2 22

2 54 6 13

12 5 1 15

1 2 6 1

32 2 19 7

6 0 2

gcc scc54

6

4

VCC IiitC TOTAL

961

507

25

126

10 548 ,

1,572

1 161

143

142

850

126

78

9 150

149

32 449

1,210

175

358

67 6 933

53

184

306

696

204

181

557

605

256

10 124

12 793

105

1,03 1,234

4,589

11133

200

127

0 12 523

0 276

0 204

0 54

0 157

1 99

37

APSU ETSU NSU NTSU TSU TTU CSTCC CLCC CDC EC JCC NCC RCC SC VCC WC TOTAL

iimiphreys 5 1 18 28 1 18 0 0 135

Jackson 0 1 7 126 0 0 136

Jefferson 46 2 1 10 1 28 353

Johnson 86 1 2 1 0 92

Xhox 1 318 47 42 1 200 35 2 27 31 1 291

Lake 0 S 0 1 0 4 56

Lauderdale 2 67 2 3 5 0 26 382

Lawrence 1 23 157 20 1 25 468

Lewis 0 5 48 3 0 6 125

Lincoln 1 0 17 245 1 35 2 9 421

Loudon 33 2 9 52 20 8 208

Minn 42 1 23 75 576 738

Ndairy 2 45 8 2 0 10 164

Nhcon 1 3 25 90 0 5 176

Madison 5 321 63 6 27 1 98 1,488

Nhrion 1 4 4 63 34 4 11 194

Marshall 1 S 9 116 21 0 13 308

Maury 1 2 52 321 3 41 0 84 1,307

Meigs 3 0 2 14 63 1 97

Nbnroe 34 6 12 20 36 1 137

Nbntgomery 1,89 2 19 65 3 19 2 2,049

Nbore 2 0 22 13 0 3 79.

Mbrgan 9 0 2 S7 0 14 215

Obion 0 14 6 8 1 3 1 81

Oyerton 2 1 6 201 6 219

Perry 4 0211 2 0 3 94

Pickett 0 1 1 70 0 74

Polk 11 0 13 9 1 177 221

Putnam 7 6 19 1,218 3 1,260

Rhea 7 2 19 62 2 12 11 242

Roane 49 12 52 143 9 1,00 1,277

Robertson 16 3 3 79 1 25 0 6 358

Rutherford 7 9 2,035 1 19 0 2,097

Scott 4 2 15 78 0 1 121

Sequatchie 0 3 11 32 1 7 71

Sevier 51 1 8 32 5 7 178

Shelby 2 15 8 707 58 30 69 0 1 3,93 23,115

Smith 2 0 44 107 0 3 190

Stewart 11 0 0 .6 0 0 120

Sullivan 2,976 27 34 1 147 1 6 3,272

Sumner 3 5 39 274 4 107 0 1,26 1,768

Tipton 1 156 3 5 1 0 5 282

Trousdale1

0 3 19 6 0 3 72

Unicoi 339 1 0 11 1 352

Union 9 0 0 1 1 1 35

APSU ETSU MSU NEU TSU ITU CSTC CIC COCC DCC JCC MCC RC

VanBuren 0 0 0 1 0 35 0 0 0 1

Warren S 3 6 226 9 208 1 0 0 20

Washington 2 2,344 12 9 6 16 4 0 1 0

Wayne 7 4 6 22 0 4 64 0 0 0

Weakley 2 0 13 3 0 5 1 3 8 0

White 1 2 0 24 3 295 0 0 0 HOWilliamson 4 3 17 262 48 52 65 0 0 1

Wilson 9 0 6 348 26 60 0 0 0' 0

Out-of-State

& Foreign 391 1,249 1 509 725 1,212.. 670 300 55 31. 0 0 18 0

Invalid Address

'and other 618 10 .81 , 54 152 .19 '0 77 4 0 1, 0 .1

.Total 4.160 10,288 22,364 10,562 5,167 .6,968. 3,471 3,169.1 797 1,106 2,186 1 108 2,394

Source: Fall 1975 Student Information System

scc yewoo ToTE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

25

. 25

4,050 2

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

168

16

11

347

1

8

23

2,877

37

479

2,411

107

35

326

453

617

6,209'

1,076

84,014

40

Table 6GRADUATES

DEGREES AND CERTIFICATES AWARDED, 1975-76

AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY

Assrciate of Arts 34Ass ciate of Science 1

BaLlelor of Arts 11Bachelor of Fine Arts 3

Bachelor of Science in Education 68Bachelor of Science 362Nhster of Arts in. Education 114Nhster of Arts 24Mhster of Music Education 3

Nhster of Science 6

Specialist in Education 2

Total 628

EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY

Associate of Science in Dental Hygiene 30Associate of Science in Nursing 58Associate of Science 31Bachelor of Axts 13Bachelor of Fine Axts 15Bachelor of Science in Environmental Health 64Bachelor of Science in Medical Technology 4

Bachelor of Science in Music Education 18Bachelor of Science in Nursing 72Bachelor of Social Welfare 82Bachelor of Science 951Nhster of Arts in Teaching 13Nhster of Arts 202Nhster of Business Administration 18Nhster of City Nhnagement 4Master of Fine Arts 11Nhster of Science in Environmental Health 28Nhster of Science 17Specialist in EducationDoctor of Education 3Total 1639

MEMPHIS STATE UNIVERSITY

Associate of Arts 107Bachelor of Arts 486Bachelor of Business Administration 488Bachelor of Fine Arts 66Bachelor of Nbsic Education 16Bachelor of Nbsic 17Bachelor of Professional Studies 2

41

32

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering 29

Bachelor of Science in Chemistry 3

Bachelor of Science in Education 483Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering 29

Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology 77Bachelor of Science in Geology 12

Bachelor of Science in Home Economics 9

Bachelor of Science in 1Ichanical Engineering 20

Bachelor of Science in Medical Technology 9

Bachelor of Science in Technology 6

Bachelor of Science 191Nbster of Arts in Teaching 17Mhster of Arts 118Mhster of Business Administration 35Mhster of City and Regional Planning 2

Mhster of Education 632Mhster of Fine Arts 3

Mhster of MUsic 12Mhster of Public Administration 17Mhster of Science in Teaching 11Mhster of Science 142Specialist in Education 1

Doctor of Education 28Juris Doctor 181Doctor of Philosophy 14Total 3263

MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY

Associate of Arts 50Bachelor of Arts 38Bachelor of Business Administration 139Bachelor of Fine Arts 10Bachelor of 'tisk 19Bachelor of Science 1228Mhster of Arts in College Teaching 1

Mhster of Arts in Teaching 32Master of Arts 156Mhster of Business Administration 32Mhster of Business Education 3

Masnr of Education 303Master of Public Administration 12Master of Science in Teaching 12Mhster of Science 15Specialist in Education 60Doctor of Arts 21Total 2131

4 2

33

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY

Associate of Arts 42Associate of Science 19Bachelor of Arts 12Bachelor of Science 549Mhster of Arts in Education 134Nhster of Arts 16Nhster of Education 15Mhster of Science 112Specialist in Education 4Total 903

TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

Bachelor of Arts 14Bachelor of Science in Agriculture 38Bachelor of Science in Business Adtinistration 182Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering 54Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering 15Bachelor of Science in Education 271Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering 54

Bachelor of Science in EngineeriRg Science 12

Bachelor of Science in Home Economics 30 .....,

Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering 15Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology 35

Bachelor of Science in 1.1chanical Engineering 37

Bachelor of Science 231Nhster of Arts 203Nhster of Civil Engineering 3

Nhster of Electrical Engineering 1

Nhster of Engineering 4

Nhster of Mechanical Engineering ,A.

Mhster of Science 48

Specialist in Education 30

Doctor of Philosophy 4

Total 1282

CHATIANCOGA STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Certificate _39Associate Degree (General Education) 10

Associate of Science 167Total 216

CLEVELAND STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Certificate 5

Associate of Arts 30

Associate of Science 324Total 359

4 3

34

COLUMBIA STATE CONNUNITY COLLEGE

Certificate 14Associate of Science 221Total 235

DYERSBURG STATE OMUNITY COLLEGE-

Associate of ArtsAssociate of ScienceTotal

JACKSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

1

90

91

Associate of Arts 13Associate of Science 198Total 211

marLow STATE CONNUNITY OOLLEGE

Certificate 5

Associate of Arts 7Associate of Science 160Total 172

ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Associate of Arts 5

Associate of Science 99Total 104

ShELBY STATE COMMUNITY OOLLEGE

Associate of Applied Science 57Associate of Arts 14Associate of Liberal Arts 12Associate of Science 71Total 154

VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY OOLLEGE

Certificate 16Associate of Arts 84Associate of Science 136Total 236

WALTERS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Certificate 33Associate of Science 226Total 259

Source: 1975-76 Academic Inventory

4 435

FULL-TINE FACULTY Pi INSTRUCTION

BY RANK BY DEGREE

1975-76

Nhsters Masters Nhsters

Doctorate .1. 90 Hours 45 Hours and Other Total

Austin Peay State University

Professor 39 0 0 1 40

Associate Professor 35 3 8 8 54

Assistant Professor 11 7: 5 8 31

Instructor 0 1 1 20 22

Total g Tr 1T -37 147

Ihst Tennessee State University

Professor 75 2 3 6 86

Associate Professor 53 15 20 12 100

Assistant Professor 58 18 16 38 130

Instructor 0 0 5 39 44

Total Iff

Memphis State University

Professor 139 1 3 11, 164

Associate Professor 132 2 4 13 151

Assistant Professor 111 9 15 77 212

Instructor 6 4 11 68 89

Total Tg! 7 7 17 §

Middle Tennessee State University

Professor 93 0 3 3 99

Associate Professor 108 9 16 10 143

Assistant Professor 55 18 16 27 116 46Instructor 1 0 . 1 25 27

Total T If

Tennessee State University

Professor 21 2 1 2

Associate Professor 10 4 9 7

Assistant Professor 52 6 5, 31

Instructor 3 1 1' 55

Total E. T3* 7 Ts" To

26

30

94

60

4 7

Masters Masters Masters

Doctorate + 90 Hburs + 45 Hours and Other Total

Tennessee Technological University

Professor 52

Associate Professor 64

Assistant Professor 48

Instructor l'

1 1 3

10 3 11

12 4 38

0 1 17

57

88

102

19

Total T-63 TS T g T6-6

Onattanooga State Technical

Community College

Professor 1 0 0 4 5

Associate Professor 3 0 2 20 25

Assistant Professor 0 0 0 13 13

Instructor 0 0 0 13 13

Total T IT T 7 3-6-

Cleveland State Comity College

Professor 0 0 1 0 0

Associate Professor 2 1 0 2 S

Assistant Professor 3 S 7 23 38

Instructor 0 0 0 18 18

Total 3 W 7 HTS 61.

Columbia State Community College

Professor 1 0 0 0 1

Associate Professor 3 0 0 0 3

Assistant Professor 5 0 6 10 21

Instructor 0 0 0 19 19

Total -9- -6 6. T§. TT

Dyersburg State Community College

Professor 0 0 0 0 0

Associate Professor 2 9 0 0 2

Assistant Professor 3 1 5 11 20

Instructor 0 2 0 6 8

Total 3 3 3 17 7Jackson State Community College

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

Instructor

Total

1 0

3 0

0

0

3 6 1 20 30

0 0 0 22 22

7 .6" tf

0 3

Mhsters MOters

Doctorate + 90 Hours + 40 Hfout

Mbtlow State Community College

Professor 1 0 0

Associate Professor 1 0 2

Assistant Professor 3 0 5

Instructor 0 0 5

Total 5 IT II

Roane State Community College

Professor 0 0 0

Associate Professor 0 0 0

Assistant Professor 10 0 2

Instructor 3 0 2

Total IS. -0- .ii.

Shelby State Community College

Professor 1 0 0

Associate Professor 2 2 1

Assistant Professor 9 4 2

Instructor 0 0 4

Mhsters

and Other Total

0 1

0 3

1 9

18 21

17 11-

0 0

0 0

17 29

21 26

3.

1 2

7 12

15 30

46 50

Total TT 6 f R. R

Volunteer State Community College

Professor 0 0

Associate Professor 4 0

Assistant Professor 7 5

Instructor 0 3

Total IT -8-

Walters State Community College

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

Instructor

Total

0

4

4

0

8

0

0

0

0 0

1 1

2 6

2 20

..f

0 0

0 2

4 19

1 17

'31

0

6

20

25

0

6.

27

18 50Tr

Total Universities

Doctorate

Professor 419

Associate Professor 402

Assistant Professor 335

Instructor 11

Total 1,167

Total Community Colleges

Professor 5

Associate Professor 24

Assistant Professor 47

Instructor 3

Total 7

Total System

Professor 424

Associate Professor 426

Assistant Professor 382

Instructor 14

Total 1,246

Masters Mhsters Masters

+ 90 Hburs + 45 Hours and Other Total

6 11 36 472

43 60 61 566

70 61 219 685

6 20 224 261

75- IT 3T6 1,984

0 0 5 10

3 6 32 65

21 34 135 237

5 12 200 220

g 32- Ti 72"

6 11 41 482

46 66 93 631

91 95 354 922

11 32 424 481

154 T 912 2,516

Source: 1975-76 Institutional Budgets - filled positions in Instruction

Table 8

LIBRARIESVOLUMES

NumberHeld

Niimber

Added Total7-1-75 1975-76 Nimber

Austin Peay State University 168,000 8,097 176,097

East Tennessee State University 456,031 43,500 499,531

14mphis State University 634,811 55,000 689,811

Middle Tennessee State University 313,241 25,000 338,241

Tennessee State University 232,277 11,500 243,777

Tennessee Technological University 251,087 19,835 270,922

Sub Total 2,055,447 162 932 2,218,379

Chattanooga State Technical Community College 18 891 1,200 20021

Cleveland State Community College 39,936 3,800 43,736

Columbia State Community College 38,774 500 39,274

Dyersburg State Community College 20,000 2,000 22,000

Jackson State Community College 38 303 3,600 41,903

Mbtlow State Community College 24,000 1,000 25,000

Roane Siate Community College 13,800 3,500 17,300

Shelby State Community College 27,255 5,545 32,800

Volunteer State Community College 18,251 5,000 23,251

Walters State Community College 33,100 ---3,500 36,600

Sub Total 272,310 29 645 301,955

Total 2,327,757 192,577 2,520,334

Source: Institutional Budgets 1975-76

40

MIGROTM

NuMberHeld7-1-75

NuMberAdded1975-76

TotalNUMber

Austin Peay State University 45,976 5,000 50,976

East Tennessee State Uhiversity 44,661 4,000 48,661

Memphis State University 1,110,951 85,000 1,195,951

Middle Tennessee State University 365,018 40,000 405,018

Tennessee State University 7,533 1,325 8,858

Tennessee Technological University 291,374 45,000 336 374

Sub Total 1,865,513 180,325 2,045,838

Chattanooga State Technical Community College 1,885 15 1,900

Cleveland State Cormulity College 6,119 400 6,519

Columbia State Community College 1,370 8 1,378

Dyersburg State Community College 1,472 250 1,722

Jackson State Community College 1,071 150 1,221

Mbtlow State Community College 1,618 350 1,968

Roane State Community College 1,267 600 1,867

Shelby State Community College 1,129 600 1,729

Vblunteer State Community College 1,752 300 2,052

Walters State Community College 849 250 1,099

Sub Total 18,532 2,923 21,455

Total 1,884,045 183,248 2,067 293

Source: Institutional Budgets 1975-76

Table 9

Changes in Academic UnitsFiscal Year 1975-76

New Degree Programs

Austin Peay State Uhiversity

AS in Secretarial ScienceAA in Advertising ArtBS in Special Education

Tennessee State Uhiversity

Joint BS in Engineering with the University of Tennessee at Nashvillerenewed

Tennessee Technological University

Vocational Agriculture as an area of certificationMasters in BUSiPsss Administration

Chattanooga State Technical Community College

Banking and Finance option to AS in MhnagementForestry, Fisheries and Wildlife Mhnagement option to AS in MhnagementLandscape and TUrf Mhnagement option to AS in Mhnagement

Cleveland State Community College

Certificate in Respiratory Therapy TechnologyCertificate in Real Estate

Mbtlow State Community College

AS in EngineeringAS in Engineering TechnologyBanking and Finance option to AS in Business TechnologyReal Estate option to AS in Business Technology

Roane State Community College

AS in Police Science and Criminology Education

Shelby State Cbmmunity College

Certificate in Family ServicesAAS in Insurance Administration

Volunteer State Community College

Certificate in Dental Assisting Technology

Whlters State Community College

AS in Fire Science Technology 5 542

Program Consolidations and Redesignations

Memphis State University

MST in Mathematics redesignated as MS in Mathematical SciencesBA major in Law Enforcement redesignated as Criminal JusticeMaster of MUsic Education degree redesignated as the Master of Education

degree

Tennessee Technological University

BSAG in Agricultural Economics redesignated as BSAG in AgribusinessEconomics

Cleveland State Community College

AS in Pre-Engineering terminated and consolidated as an option to theAS in Mathematics

AS's in Physical Science, Pre-Dental Hygiene, Pre-Med, Pre-Dentistry,Pre-Physical Therapy, Pre-Pharmacy, and Pre-Medical Technologyterminated and consolidated as options to the AS in Natural Science

Mbtlow State Community College

AA and AS "General" degrees redesignated as "University Parallel"

Organizational Unft Changes

Austin Peay State University

Eliminated the Division of '4)p1ied Arts and Sciences and relocated theaffected departments in the three reffiainEng academic divisions ofthe university

Eliminated the position of Assistant to the Vice President for AcademicAffairs

Eliminated the office of Pvblic ServicesChanged the name of the SchGol of Business and Economics to the College

of Business and ProfessiovAl Programs, and located the Departmentsof Agriculture, Industrial Arts, awd Military Science in the Collegeof Business and Professional Prograns

Changed the name of the College of Education to the College of Educationand Human Services, and located the Department of Nurse Education inthe College of Education and Human Services

Relocated the Department of Music from the College of Education to theCollege of Arts and Sciences

Established an Office of Continuing Education and Community Services undertho auspices of the Vice President of Academic Affairs to encompassexisting programs in public services and continuing studies

Middle Tennessee State University

Department of Nhthematics redesignated as Department of Nhthematics andComputer Scienee

5- 6

43

Tennessee State University

Political Science Department redesignated as Department of Governmentand Public Affairs

Motlow State Community College

Divisions of Humanities, Social Science and Education, and Math andScience consolidated as Division of Liberal Arts

5 7

44

Table 10Off-Campus Locations

In an effort to reach and meet the needs of more students, most of theinstitutions of the State University and Community College System ofTennessee have established programs for offering instruction at locationsaway fram the main campus. The usual arrangements for off-campus in-struction entail the utilization of public facilities at locations withinthe institutions' service area and instructional services provided bycampus faculty. Such off-campus programs serve the students fromneighboring towns and cities whom otherwise might not have access tocollege-level course-work.

The following is a sample listing of locations reported by the institutionswhere credit instruction was offered during the 1975-76 academic year.

Austin Peay State University East Tennessee State University

DoverWaverlyErinSpringfieldDicksonAshland CityHopkinsville, KyLindenEagle UniversityCenterville

Middle Tennessee State University

WinchesterFayettevilleTullahomaNashvilleColumbiaGallatinMcMinnvilleLebanonClarksvilleDicksonEagle University

BristolGreenevilleKingsportPenland, N.C.ElizabethtonTazewellNbuntain City

Tennessee State University

Tennessee Technological

CrossvilleMcMinnvilleBledsoe SequatchieCarthageCelinaHuntsville.JamestownLafayetteLivingston 5 3

45

FranklinMtEwenClarksvilleColumbiaGallatinMeharry Medical

CenterEagle UniversityMetro Nashville *

University

Morgan CountyDekalb CountyGrundy CountyJackson CountyHarrimanGallatinWhite CountyVan Buren County

Columbia State Community College Dyersburg State Community College

Lawrenceburg Fort PillowWaynesboro :CovingtonLewisburg TrentonPulaski RipleyCenterville TiptonvilleFranklin TroyHarden County

Jackson State Community College Mbtlow State Community College

Milan ShelbyvilleBrownsville Tullahoma *Lexington FayettevilleSelmer MhnchesterMiddleton WinchesterBolivar

Roane State Community College Walters State Community College

Harriman * SneedvilleRockwood TazewellAnderson County HarrogateKnox County KnoxvilleLoudon County GreenevilleRhea County SurgoinsvilleMbrgan County MaryvilleCampbell County NewportKingston Sevierville

KingsportJohnson CityRobbinsMt. KarmelBrushy Mbuntain

* Off-campus instruction offered at location (s) within the home cityof the institution.

Source: Fall 1975 and Spring 1976 Student Information System

5 9

46

4

Table 11

PHYSICAL FACILITIES

NET ASSIDIABLE SQUARE FEET OF SPACE BY SELECTED CATEGORY

June 30, 1976

Institution

Class-

rooms

Class

Labs

Individual

Study

Labs

Instr.,

Offices

Admin, Physical Student Physical

OffiCes 4brary Education Seryices PlantL'

Austin Peay State University28,552 90,537 4,706 25,455 19,442 29,935 105,518 67,627 39,003East Tennessee State University

206,997 159,827 9,430 86,997 52,275 98,878 200,562 755,989 34,9051+.bephis State University240,057 303,695 15,272 190,126 105,239 172,445 171,985 204,908 50,014:Middle Tennessee State University119,035 146,648 2,993 82,956 45,375 95,250 167,268 149,192 63,171Tennessee State University69,796 101,655 6,315 66,837 31,600 99,775 149,804 67,687 20,830Tennessee Technological University 158,161 165,615 6,271 116,462 25,751 61,125 47,617 153,944 38,714

Sub Total822,598 967,977 44,987 568,833 279,682 557,408 842,754 899,347 246,637

Chattanooga State Technical Community College 27,766 28,939 6,889 3,425 19,900 19,527 21,200Cleveland State Community College31,784 32,693 1,301 13,219 7,099 15,288 21,142 15,865 8,843Columbia State Community College24,363 28,805 526 9,664 7,374 18,469 18,750 15,170 10,521Dyersburg State Community College12,794 15,433 6,214 7,310 7,437 20,750 8,214 9,053Jackson State Comeunity College20,965 20,066 1,737 8,154 10,797 20,632 15,090 11,920 11,237Motlow'State Commity College 13,386 16,072 1,548 7,186 8,071 16,351 16,280 10,315 4,305Roane State Community College22,119 29,886 2,989 11,627 10,801 7,091 17,121 11,708 4,009Shelby State Community College49,013 40,191 20,978 5,916 16,882 18,680 20,153 11,129Volunteer State Community College 21i886 36,733 1,440 12,441 9,343 12,642 13,823 10,352 11,317Walters State Connunity College20,222 14,031 1,040 14,646 10,404 20,500 20,933 23,272 7,661

Sub Total24,301 262,848 10,581 111,018 80,540 155,192 187,096 148,169 78,075

Total1,066,899 1,230,825 55,568 679,851 360,222 712,600 1,029,M 1,047,516 324,712

Source: Institutional Fiscal 1977 Capital Budget Documents

601

CONSTRUCTION

Planning/Developmental Stages,Tune 30, 1976

Table 12

Budget

East Tennessee State University Project Institution

Chiller Plant Phase II $ 1,000,000Wilson Hall Renovation 1,436,000

$ 2,436,000Memphis State University

Waste Disposal Facilities 75,000Library Expansion Phase I 2,340,000Audiolo7y and Speech Pathology Center Addition 422,000_

$ 2,837,000Middle Tennessee State University

Heating and Chilling Plant $ 1,208,000Faculty Office Annex 1,090,000

$ 2,298,000Chattanooga State Technical Community College

Student Center $ 2,240,000

2,240,000Roane State Community Collee

Technology Building $ 2,445,000

$ 2,445,000Shelby State Communiz_follege

Midtown Campus, Wing "F". $ 2,822,000

$ 2,8224000Volunteer State CommunitK College

C6Mp1etion of Campus Center $ 196,000ETechnOlogy-Building 1,470,000

$ 1,666,000Walters State.Corrity College

Student Services and Learning RescrOrces Center $ 2,218,000

2,218,000

TOTAL

, 6 2

$18,962,000

In Progress,June 30,-1976

East Tennessee State University Pro'ect

Budget

Institution

Student Center $ 7,263,000Physical Education Complex 7,413,000Central Control Nbnitoring System 500,000Heating Plant and Pollution Control 1,002,000

$16,178,000Memphis State University

Addition to Law Building $ 1,520,000

$ 1,520,000Tennessee State University

President's Residence $ 100,000Business Administration Building 1,666,000Library 2,470,000Heating Plant Pollution Control 697,000

$ 4,933 000Tennessee Technological University

Health and Physical Education Building $ 5,400,000

$-5,400 000--Chattanooga-State Technical Community College

Campus Expansion Phase II (Learning ResourcesCenter) $ 1 600,000

$ 1,600,000Shelby State Community College

Midtown Campus -- Phase II $ 6,224,000Parking Facility at Midtown Campus 231,000Midtown Campus Wing "D" 3,076,000

$ 9,531,000

.TOTAL $39162,000

6 3

Completed,June 30, 1976

BudgetAustin Peay State University Project

Winfield Dunn Health and Physical Education Center 5,300,000Renovation of Clement Hall 258,000Underground Electrical System 106,000

Institution

$ 5,664,000East Tennessee State Uhiversity

Renovation of Gilbreath Hall $ 1,170,000Improvement of Campus Utilities 267,000

Memphis State University

Renovation of Administration Building $ 2,413,000Utilities Expansion, Phase III 516,000Learning Resources Center 250,000Mbdification of Johnson Hall 153,000Paving and Landscaping of South Campus 300,000Addition to Chucalissa Museum 183,000Renovation of Chemistry and Life Science Building 460,000

Tennessee State University

Renovation of Underground UtilitiesRenovation of Administration BuildingCentral Chilling PlantRenovation of Stadium

Tennessee Technological University

GreenhouseFarm Buildings

$ 1,437,000

$ 4,275,000

364,000200,000847,000174,000

$ 1,585,000

50,00048,000

Columbia State Community College

Allied Medical Service Laboratory 150,000

Mbtlow State Community College

Air Conditioning for Gymnasium Area $ 40,000

98,000

$ 150,000

Shelby State Community College

Parking Facility at Midtown Campus 231,000

Walters State Community College

Outdoor Physical Education FacilitiesParking and Campus Improvements

6 4

50

$ 40,00.0

$ 231,000

80,00075,000

TOTAL

$ 155,000

$ 13,635.10

FINANCE

Notes to Financial Statements(Tables 13, 14, & 15)

for the Year Ended June 30, 1976

1. These are the consolidated financial statements of the institutionsgoverned by the State Board of Regents and of the staff office of theState Board of Regents.

2. The financial statements are prepared in accordance with FinancialReporting for Tennessee Public Colleges and Universities.

3. Financial reports of the System are audited by the Division of StateAudit, Comptroller of the Treasury, . State of Tennessee. These areunaudited financial statements.

4. The employer portions of retirement and social security contributions forcertain faculty and administrators are paid by direct appropriation tothe State Division of Retirement. In accordance with the FinancialReporting for Tennessee Public Colleges and Uhiversities, this directappropriation is recognized as current restricted revenue and expen-ditures for this fiscal year.

5. Nbney received and disbursed for the federal gwernment Basic EconomicOpportunity Grant has been reclassified from the current restrictedfund to the agency fund to better recognize the function of theinstitution in handling the money.

6. Long-term indebtness includes a new bond issue by the Tennessee StateSchool Bond Authority of $32,149,791.88 for Board of Regents institutionsto replace temporary financing.

7. Auxiliary Enterprises balance sheets accounts were included in theaccounts of the unrestricted current fund on the June 30, 1975 financialstatements.

8. A single operating bank account is maintained for all funds in eachinstitution. The credit balance in unrestricted current fund cash isoff-set in other funds' cash.

6 5

51

STATE UNIVERSITY AND ONAJNITY COLLEGE ona4 OF TIMESSEE

UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET

JUNE 30, 1976

with comparative figures for June 30, 1975

ASES

CURRENT FUNDS

Unrestricted

General:

Cash

Short-term Investments

Accounts Receivable

Inventories

(at lower cost or market FIFO basis)

Due from Other Funds

Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Charges

Other Assets

ul Total Generalh:

Auxiliary Enterprises:

Cash

Investments

Accounts Receivable

Inventories

(at lower cost or market FIFO basis)

Deferred Darges

Total Auxiliary Enterprises

TOTAL METED FUNDS

Restricted

Cash

Short-term Investments

Accounts Receivable

Due frmn Other Funds

TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS

66 TOTAL CUPENT FUNDS

1976 1975 LIABILITIES AND FUN9 BALANCES

$(1,632,900,31)

24,117,410.47

2,693,208.19

873,973.04

2,614,077,23

60,868.79

19,102.92

$ 915,754,66

24,279,329.56

2,533,335.88

3,574,910.06

1,487,650.02

20,267.55

3,061.51

$21,745,70.33 $32,814,309.24

$ 413,577.50

2 311,849.01

151,707.64

3,331,856.18

9,163.57

,218,153,90

963$7.23

$ 638,510.70

136,820,38

6,676,995.95

129,356.03

i 7;381683,06

$42,545,577,29

$ 1,487,661.13

, 35,061.30

4,555,509.08

10,848.47

3 6,089.1179.98

$38,903,389.22

CURRET FUNDS

Unrestricted

'General:

Accounts Payable

Accrued Liabilities

Student Deposits

Due to Other Funds

Deferred Revenue

Other Liabilities

Total General Liabilities

Fund Balance

Non-discretionaryAllocation

AllJcation for Working Capital

Allocation for Encumbrances

Discretionary Allocations

Unallocated

Total Fund Balance

Total General

Auxiliary Enterprises:

Accounts Payable

Accrued Liibilities

Student Deposits

Deferred Credit

Total Auxiliary Liabilities

Fund Balances

Non-discretionary Allocation

Allocation for Working Capital

Allocation for Encuntrances

Discretionary Allocations

Unallocated Fund Balance

Total Fund Balance

Total Auxiliary EnterriA'l

TOTAL UNRESTRICTED FIE

1976

$ 1,918,233.58

6,466,206.98

419,003.67

1,011,982,87

4,160,588.90

.30,358.58

$14,006;374-38

$ 3,586,264.18

3,376,543.82

5,337,572.85

4,438,984.90

$14,739,365.75

$28,745 740.35

$ 86,724.81

21,86335

60,379.00

892,427.00

'S 1 061,394.36

$ 3,550,288.79

57,167,39

1 714,654.15

165 350.79

11 S4)75 .

$ 6,218,155.96

._.1L2.21$3

Restricted

Accounts Payable

Dtio to Other Funds

Fund $alance

ItTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS

TCTAL CURRENT FUNDS

$ 69,346.86

2,538,955.21

4,973,380.99

7,581,683.06

$42,454,577,291====

Table 13

1975

$ 2,081,641.57

6,506,586.07

440,719.92

589,345.84

4,743,653,38

$14-,361.946,78

$ 6,055,337.57

5,705,496.13

2,173,745.34

4,517,783,42

$18,452,362.4.6

$32,814-,309.24

$181422.

$ 8,544.82

1,490,711,02

4,589;824,14

$ 61(_12.229.1

$18-9-03-389E

ASSETS

PLANT FUNDS

UneXpended

Cash

Short-term Investments

AccOunts Receivable

Due from Other Funds

Other Assets

TOTAL Hoe:11ED

RETIREMENT OF INDEBTMESS AND

RENEWAL AND PLACEMENT

Cash

Deposits with Trustees

Short7term Investments

Accounts Receivable

Due from Other Funds

UNAUDITED BALANa SiEBT (CONTI

1976 191 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES

$ 11,496,379.95

7,422,428.00

512,075.47

740,960.91

$ 23,038,272.27

7,428,120.73

1,080,019.74

311,202.58

31L2787 44_-____---

$ 19,771,814.33 $ 31,889 402.76

$ 1,035,984.72

4,382,724.97

5,757,323.94

26,416.76

19,203.82

TOTAL RETIREMENT OP INDEBTEDNESS $ 11,221,654.21

$ 1,963,572.20

2,103,081.60

7,828,609.17

67,080.29

29 448.31

$ 11,991 791.57

1976 1975

PLANT FUNDS

Unexpended

Accounts Payible 8,010.08 $ 50,179.77

Due to Other Funds 13,169.38 7,768.21

Fund Balances 19,750,664.87 31,831,454.78

TOTAL UEMED $ 19,771,844.33 $ 31,889,402.76

RETIREMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND

RENEWAL AND PLACEMENT

Bond 'and Nbtes Payable $ 986.75 $ 392,177.67

Fund Balance 111,220,667.46 11,59C1,613.90

TOTAL RETIREMENT OF

INDEBTEDNESS AND RENEWAL 11,221,654.21 $ 11,991,791.57AND RENEWAL AND ELM'

AIOREPLMENT

INVESTMENT IN pLANT

Land

Other Improvements

Buildings

Equipmelt

Library Books

IJivestock

Projects in Progress

Microfilm

Other

MAL INVESTIENT IN PLANT

TOTAL PIM RINDS

68

ENVESTMENT IN PLANT

$ 19,337,92.66 $ 17,624,588.68 Notes and Bonds Payable

17,151,846.66 14,864,051.23 Net Investment in Plant

284,805,547.08 265,902,991.06

56,221,399.98 54,152,485.66

22,195,238.57 19,741,099.70

143,021.00 160,940.99

22,137,341.56 22 394,514.32

71,769.18

142 969 89

$394,840,671.64 TOTAL INVESIKT IN PLANT

$453,200,555.12 $438,721_,865.97 TCTAL PLANT FUNDS

$ 78,902,918.77 $ 77,267,200.40

343,304,137.81 317,573,471.24: =

$422,207 056.58 $394,840,671.64

$453,200,555.12 $438,721,865.97

UNAUDITED Boa SHEET (CONT'D)

.AstNs

LOAN FUNDS

1976 1975

Cash $ 650,327.84 $ 750,462.97

Short-Term hvesuents 335,012.61 149,850.35

Notes and 'Grants Receivable 13,688,136.10 12,790,379.62

Due from Other Funds 134,416.91 146,859.87

Cther Assets 61 523 OD 98 932 11

TOR. IDAN FUNT $14,09,416.46 $13 936,484.92

ENDohET AND ona 6111S

Cash $ 67,655.28 $ 56,372.90

Short-tem ii nts 242,655.17 214,544.04'

Receivakes 352.13 339.39

TOTAL gOONEN7 AND SIMILAR FUNDS $ 310,662,58 $ 271,256.23

AGENCY FUNDS

Cash

Short-term li...;.:Aneats

Accounts Receivable

Due from Other FundS

1= =========sliz

LIABILITI1S AND FUND BALANCES

LOAN FUNDS

rue to Other Funds

Fund Balance

1CCAL LOAN FUNDS

maw AND SIMILAR FUNDS

Due to Other Funds

Fund Balance

=ITAL ENDOMIT AND SIMILAR

FUNDS

AGENCY FUNDS

$ 933,438.08 $ 273,862.79 Due to Other Funds

32,658.30 8,788,35 Deposits held in custody

944,641.02 617,978.40 for others

450,00 112 664 29

TOTAL AGENCY RMS L1t9ll,187 .4.3 IDTA AGENCY FUNDS

70

1976

$ 22,625.30

1975

14,846,791.16 13,936,484 92

$14.4821.42.46 $13 936 484 92

$ 418.65 $ 192.22

310 243.93 271,064.01

_2,662.58

$ 51,313.49

1059,873.91

LAIL1_8_7L,0

u:12.5ja

$ 10,656.25

1,002,637.58

WIFJ1.81

71

THE STATE UNIVERSITY AR COMITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF TENNESSEE

UNAUDITED STUENT OF CURRENT 1UNDS, REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND OTHER CHANGES

For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 With Comparative Figures for June 30, 1975

Revenues

7El:on and Fees

Federal Appropriations

State Appropriations

Federal Grants and Contracts

State Grants aad Contracts

Local Grants and Contracts

Private Gifts, Grants and Contracts

Endowment Income

Sales and Services of Educational Activities

Sales and Services of Auxiliary Enterprises

Other Sources

Total Revenue

Dpenditures and Mdatory Transfers

Education and eneraf

Instniction

Research

Public Service

kademic Support

Student Services

Institutional Support

Operation and Maintenance of Plant

Scholarships and Fellowships

Total Educational and General Expenditures

Mandatory Transfers for:

Loan Fund Matching Grants

Unexpended Plant Fund

Total Educational and General

Unrestroa-$ 31,536,566.40 $

846,473.34

83 548,700.93

506,789,60

326,276.88

497,723.37

159,574.85

9,357,491.23

12,931,074,42

1,847,124,30

197,377,05

1,296,121.08

2,635,9195

21,340,642,45

2,425,903.79 68,838,30

$143,824,563.56 $25)608,02638

$ 61,508,540.74

678,023.50

1,385,352,52

14,650,307.37

11,954,169,77

12,792,628,73

16,412,063.29

318,113.67

119,89,199.0.

118,704,53

2 064 073.15

,27 17;:";617B6'

$13,248,747.07

2,668,632.83

2,099,453.15

1,433,543.40

1,610,643.21

882,853.86

138,581.38

3,287,945.06

$25,365,399,96

$ 31,836,566.40

846,473.34

92,906,192,16

13,437,864,02

2,173,401.18

695,100.42

1,455,695,93

Table 14

1975

Total

$ 27,071,898 11

1,301,165.34

78,294,517,76

13,761,545,86

1,7'9,211.90

1,751,576.25

s,356.00

2,635,911.95 2,624,028.57

21,340,642,45 20,267,845.52

2,494,742.09 3,208,086.07

1156,067-,231.3t

$ 74,752,287.81

3,346,656.33

3,484,805.67

16,083,850.77

13,564,812.98

13,675,482.59

16,550,644.67

3,606,058.73

RIS754:55:55

$ 60,381,236.38

6,801,193.39

3,676,580.03

15,336,186.26

11,564,884.03

12,318,864.96

14,029,051.08

5/230,746.85

$13,338,74238

118,704,53 137,816.02

2 064 073.15 110,000,00

$13,586,559.01

Auxiliary Enterprises

Expenditures $ 17,542,055.05 $ 332,626.42 $ 17,874,681.47

Mhndatory Transfers for:

Principal and Interest 2,538,131.62 2,5241.62Renewals and Replacements 23,300.00 23,300,00

72

$ 16,707 661 82

1,982,469.84 ?)1r

CD

:9 300,00

Retirement of Indebtedness

Total Auxiliary Enterprises

Total Expenditures and Transfers

Other Transfers and Additions/(Deductions)

Excess of Restricted Receipts Over

Transfers to Revenue

Refund to Grantors

Unrestricted Gifts Allocated to Other Funds

Indirect Cost Recoveries

NonAtarkory Transfers

Princip4 aid Interest

To Unmended Plant

From Agacy

From Endoument

Other

Total Transfers

Net Increase/(Decrease) in Fund Balance

133,322 88 133,322,88

$ 2b,544,562.1 7732767672- T70,8777188.54 'St 18,719,431.66

$142,416,539.39 $25,698,026.38 11'68,124,565,77 $148,305 990,66

$ 1,295,173,78 $ 1,295,173,78 $

(543,351,83) (543,351.83)

(18,880.00) (18,880.00)

(265,152.42) (265,152,42)

(80,000,00) (80,000,00)

402,76 402.76

109,369.46 (103,515.41) 5,854,02

$ 10 489.46T383,583

S- 194 046:31

$ 1,408,513.63 $ 383,556.85 1_117_92211 $

71,346 64

(406,465.35)

(17,000.00)

(223,443.54)

(808,243.14)

(1,343,138.10)

1,635,23

37 958,05

,

...(92,6,101,2)