teqnote - chain grade numbers
DESCRIPTION
Understanding Chain Grade Markings and how they apply to Lifting & Rigging.TRANSCRIPT
TeqNote Teqniqal Systems
THE MEANING OF WELDED LINK CHAIN GRADE NUMBERS
www.teqniqal.com www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com 817.249.4024
Consul tants Special izing in Performing Arts Technology and Safety
The chain grade numbers which manufacturers commonly use are actually one tenth of the actual grade
classes. Therefore, our grade 80 is 800, grade 70 is 700, and so on. The markings applied to the chain
product are sometimes abbreviated (8 or 80 for 800, etc.).
Grade 30 (300) (Proof Coil). A general purpose chain of standard commercial quality. Made from low
carbon steel, this chain is frequently used for fabricating tow chains, logging chains and, when
appropriate, tie down or binding chains. Hallmarked every foot or so with manufacturer's symbol and
grade marking: 3, 30, or 300 (or DIN ‘L’). NOT rated for overhead lifting. Until recently, was
commonly used in many stage rigging systems for Trim Chains on Battens.
BBB Anchor Chain. A compact (short) link chain of standard commercial quality, this is essentially a
sub-class of Grade 30. Made from low carbon steel, this chain is used primarily for boat windlasses
when hot galvanized. Hallmarked every foot or so with grade marking: 3B (or DIN ‘L’). NOT rated for
overhead lifting.
Grade 40 (400) (High Test). Strength levels are the same as Grade 43 but the dimensions of the chain
links are smaller using ISO standards. Primarily used for boat windlasses, this grade has become a
standard for that industry. The Grade 40 designation was exclusively used by ACCO Chain until 2005
to designate their High Test grade chain. They now use "43" in keeping with the rest of the industry.
The chain is hallmarked "G4". NOT rated for overhead lifting.
Grade 43 (430) (High Test). This is a higher strength chain used for years in the trucking industry for
tie downs that meet DOT specifications. Made from a high-carbon steel, its strength surpasses proof
coil working load limits, size for size, by a factor of 2 to 1. Hallmarked every foot or so with
manufacturer's symbol and grade marking: 4, 40, 43, or 430 (or DIN ‘M’). NOT rated for overhead
lifting.
Grade 70 (700) (Transport). As its name implies, Transport Chain is used primarily to tie down loads
on over-the-road equipment. The yellow chromate (gold) plating makes it easily recognizable even
from a distance. Made from heat-treated carbon-steel it has about 25% more strength than high test
chains. Hallmarked every foot or so with manufacturer's symbol and grade marking: 7, 70, or 700 (or
DIN ‘T’). NOT rated for overhead lifting.
Side Note:
High Tensile chain is anything much above 500 MPa Ultimate Breaking Strength. This is true HT
and is not the same as ‘high test’. The galvanized versions from the principle manufacturers are G7 or
G70, which has an approximately a tensile strength of 700 MPa, although the galvanizing process can
reduce the strength slightly (the manufacturer should adjust the CAP accordingly, e.g. down by 10%).
Commonly labeled as 'transport' chain in the US.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Teqniqal Systems Teq Notes: Chain Grades
www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com Page 2 of 7
More on 'high test' and ‘high tensile’
As above, high test does not mean the same thing as high tensile. The similarity in the abbreviations for
the two terms creates much confusion, particularly in the United States where manufacturers and
resellers exacerbate matters. American outlets referring to 'HT' chain are typically misusing the
engineering abbreviation for High Tensile, and this is incorrect. Moreover, because the chain is 'high
tested', it is sold with a Rated Lifting Capacity (CAP / WLL / SWL) which is calculated from a lower
ratio to the Ultimate Breaking Strength (instead of the international standard of 4:1).
This is misleading yet it does not change the ultimate strength of the steel! A particular size of
American ‘high test’ chain may look to be stronger than the same sized non-American G40 because the
CAP is calculated differently, but in-fact, they are next to identical. The proof certificate using a
different system of numbers does not change the physical properties of the steel.
Just to confuse matters further, G40 / G43 / ‘high test’ is now also being explicitly described by some
American sources as ‘high tensile’. Whether a 400-430 MPa grade steel can be properly categorized as
HT is a matter for engineers and academics to debate. Regardless, it is the numbers which matter – just
try not to get misled!
Grade 80 (800) (Alloy). The first chain specifically designed for safety and approved by OSHA and
other agencies for overhead lifting. Its alloy, heat-treated steel makes it ideal for making lifting slings
and heavy duty tow chains. Hallmarked every foot or so with manufacturer's symbol and grade
marking: 8, 80, or 800. Suitable for overhead lifting.
Grade 10 (100) (Alloy). This new innovation in alloy chain metallurgy provides about 25% higher
working load limits over Grade 80 chain with some limitations reported in lower ambient temperatures.
Hallmarked every foot or so with manufacturer's symbol and grade marking: 10 or 100. Listed as
suitable for overhead lifting.
Capacity Limit Chart
Chain strength is identified by
CAP (Rated Lifting Capacity) in pounds - the higher the CAP, the stronger the chain.
Nominal Chain Size
Grade 30 Proof Coil
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
Grade 43 High Test
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 3:1 DF)
Grade 70
Transport (CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
Grade 80
Alloy
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
Grade 100
Alloy
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
3/16” 800 - - - -
7/32” - - - 2,100 2,700
1/4” 1,300 2,600 3,150 *3,250 -
9/32” N/A N/A N/A 3,500 4,300
5/16” 1,900 3,900 4,700 4,500 -
3/8” 2,650 5,400 6,600 7,100 8,800
7/16” 3,700 7,200 8,750 - -
1/2” 4,500 9,200 11,300 12,000 15,000
5/8” 6,900 13,000 15,800 18,100 22,600
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Teqniqal Systems Teq Notes: Chain Grades
www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com Page 3 of 7
Nominal Chain Size
Grade 30 Proof Coil
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
Grade 43 High Test
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 3:1 DF)
Grade 70
Transport (CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
Grade 80
Alloy
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
Grade 100
Alloy
(CAP in Lbs) (@ 4:1 DF)
3/4” 10,600 20,200 24,700 28,300 35,300
7/8” - 24,500 - 34,200 -
1" 17,900 34,100 - 47,700 -
1¼” - - - 72,300 -
* Grade 63 chain is specifically engineered to replace Grade 30 chain used for stage rigging:
SECOA STC –or– JR Clancy AlphaChain
TERMINOLOGY
Chain Grade
The grade of a chain refers to the tensile strength class of the chain, but it is NOT necessarily the
tensile strength. Tensile strength (Ultimate Tensile Strength / UTS) is measure of force per unit area
required to deform the material beyond its useful limits (i.e. break it or fracture it). If the tensile
strength is listed in MegaPascals (MPa), then the grade of a chain is approximately equal to the tensile
strength. A Grade 800 chain means that the tensile strength of the material (usually a steel alloy) is at
least 800 MPa (MegaPascals). Force per unit area can take many forms, so the tensile strength might
be expressed in MegaPascals (MPa), Newtons per square millimeter (N/mm2), Pounds force per square
inch (PSI or Lbs/in2). The tensile strength is calculated by multiplying the material grade (use the
three digit representation, i.e. Grade 800, not Grade 80 or Grade 8) times the metric area of the two
cross-sections of a link (see below).
Example:
Area (mm2)
˟ Grade (Newtons/ mm2) = Newtons (metric Ultimate Breaking Strength)
157.08 mm2
˟ 800 (Newtons/ mm2) = 125,664 Newtons
125,664 Newtons ÷ 1000 = 125.66 kN (kiloNewtons) (metric Ultimate Breaking Strength)
or converting to imperial units:
125,664 Newtons ˟ 0.224805 (Lbs / Newton) = 28,250 Lbs (imperial Ultimate Breaking Strength)
Capacity / Working Load Limit / Safe Working Load
Working Load Limit (WLL) is sometimes called Safe Working Load (SWL). Both of these terms are
considered to be obsolete and the correct modern terminology, per ASME B30 Standard, is CAP, which
is sort for ‘Capacity’ or 'Rated Load Capacity'. Lawyers in most countries all have strongly advised
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Teqniqal Systems Teq Notes: Chain Grades
www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com Page 4 of 7
against the use of the term SAFE in 'SWL'. . The terms ‘SWL’ and ‘Safe Working Load’ are
(should be) no longer used as the word 'safe' implies that a rigging part is 'safe' even when used
within the 'SWL'. This, as we all know, is NOT the case. A piece of rigging equipment can indeed fail
even BELOW its SAFE Working Load if not properly used or if it is damaged.
Common Exceptions (documents that have not been updated to reflect this terminology):
The UK legislation which is The Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations
(LOLER '98) under Regulation 7 calls for all lifting equipment to be marked with its Safe
Working Load (SWL) and this should be permanent and legible.
Legacy Markings. You can still find ‘SWL’ on many older types of equipment. Many of the
items that are labeled this way are very heavy duty, so they will remain in-use for a long time.
In Europe CE Standards use the term 'WLL' and Working Load Limit.
OSHA regulations for slings for general industry 1910.184 and 1926.251 (effective July 8th,
2011), is littered throughout with the term ‘Safe Working Load.’
The Crosby Group (by virtue, a world standard) exclusively uses the term WLL (but some
training mentions that SWL, ‘Working Load Limit’ / WLL, and 'Rated Lifting Capacity’/ CAP
all mean the same thing).
The National Association of Chain Manufacturers (NACM) Welded Steel Chain Specifications
manual (April 11, 2010) still uses the term ‘Working Load Limit’ / WLL.
ESTA/ANSI E1.4 – Entertainment Technology – Manual Counterweight Rigging Systems; and
ESTA/ANSI E1.6 – Entertainment Technology – Powered Hoist Systems. use the term
‘Working Load Limit’ / WLL
CAP (Capacity, Working Load Limit / WLL, Safe Working Load / SWL) is NOT the same as Proof
Load nor Ultimate Breaking Strength (Ultimate Tensile Strength / UTS).
The CAP (Capacity, Working Load Limit / WLL, Safe Working Load / SWL) is the maximum load
which should ever be applied to a chain, even when the product is new and when the load is uniformly
applied in a straight line pull only. Side loading (i.e. bending a link over a sharp edge) of chain links
should be avoided.
The CAP (Capacity, Working Load Limit / WLL, Safe Working Load / SWL) is typically a predefined
ratio of the tested Ultimate Breaking Strength of the chain, so providing a safe margin of error. This
ratio is commonly around 4:1 (Ultimate Break Strength to Capacity, or UBS : CAP), except in North
America. In North America the ratio can vary by manufacturer and a lower ratio can be used to make a
chain look better than it really is. Check the ratio of the CAP against the listed Ultimate Breaking
Strength if you are unsure. Ultimate Breaking Strength, when published, is obtained under controlled
laboratory conditions. Listing of the Ultimate Breaking Strength does not mean the CAP should ever
be exceeded.
CAP is the Ultimate Breaking Strength (UBS) divided by the Design Factor (Safety Factor)
CAP = UBS ÷ DF
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Teqniqal Systems Teq Notes: Chain Grades
www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com Page 5 of 7
Proof Tested (not ‘Proof Coil’)
All quality chain is proof tested; this is where a load is applied to the newly produced chain as a quality
control measure. It is NOT a measure of performance, it is only intended to draw the manufacturer's
attention to any flaws in the chain. The common load applied during Proof Testing is done at twice the
CAP, or half the expected Ultimate Breaking Strength. Information on this proof testing should be
freely available from the manufacturer; if it is not, questions should be raised.
Proof Test Load = 2 ˟ CAP = UBS ÷ 2 (assuming that the UBS : CAP ratio is 4:1)
Design Factor (Safety Factor):
An industry term usually computed by dividing the Ultimate Breaking Strength by the CAP and
generally expressed as a ratio. For example: 3:1 (where the breaking strength is 3 times the CAP), or
4:1 (where the breaking strength is 4 times the CAP).
Commonly published Design Factors for chain are:
4:1 G30, G70, G80, G100
3:1 G40/43
Commonly published Design Factors for wire rope are:
Construction Industry 5:1
Characteristic (live) loads in stage rigging (per PLASA / ESTA / ANSI E1.4 – 2009 Manual
Counterweight Rigging Systems) 8:1
The greater of 5:1 for characteristic (live) loads and 8:1 for static loads (per PLASA / ESTA /
ANSI E1.6-1– 2011r2 Draft – Entertainment Technology - Powered Hoist Systems)
Aircraft Engineers sometimes use Design Factors as low as 2:1.
Structural Engineers sometimes use Design Factors of 3:1 or 5:1. This is very important when
looking at data sheets for any type of fastener, structural members, rods, wire rope, or other
connecting parts. Don’t assume what Design Factor was used to determine the CAP.
Shock Load:
A load resulting from rapid change of movement, such as impacting, jerking or swinging of a static load
is referred to as shock load. Sudden release of tension is another form of shock loading. Shock loads
are generally significantly greater than static loads. Any shock loading must be considered when
selecting the item for use in a system.
The term ‘Payload’:
The word 'payload' is used by many who want to describe the weight of a LOAD in layman’s terms.
This word 'payload' is not used in any standard or technical. In short, it should NOT be used as it will
lead to confusion out in the rigging field.
Payload is the term used to state load capacity for transportation, particularly for container shipments.
It is the term used to describe the net load capacity of a container and is the most common word written
on the door of shipping containers to describe this. Payload can be defined as the Maximum Gross
Weight (MGW) of a container less the Tare, or ‘self weight’, of the container box when it is empty. All
three terms (Payload, MGW, and Tare) are used to state the relevant data on a container door or body.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Teqniqal Systems Teq Notes: Chain Grades
www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com Page 6 of 7
Other Info:
The CAP (Rated Lifting Capacity) is what a piece of equipment has been designed to lift in a predefined
mode or configuration. What a piece of equipment will lift in particular service conditions and can vary
through configuration such as with mode factors for webbing slings, for example:
1te (1,000kg) webbing sling when used in straight mode can lift 1te (1000kg) but when used in
choked mode is only suitable for 800kg (reduction of 20% in the UK) but when doubled in a
parallel basket is suitable for 2te (2000kg) and when doubled but with an angle of 90 degrees, as
would be with a sling in basket mode around a box, would be 1.4te (1,400kg)
The CAP of a wire rope sling when used in a basket hitch is only valid when the bend ratio (D/d)
is not worse than 20 or 25:1. If you bend it more tightly you have to assess a reduced (de-rated)
capacity.
To convert the CAP (Rated Lifting Capacity) of various pieces of equipment to a useful number that
applies to your lifting situation, you must determine the appropriate Design Factor for the project AND
determine the Design Factor for the product.
Example:
Checking the product table for ¼” G80 chain shows a CAP of 3,250 pounds with a 4:1 Design
Factor.
It is to be used for a Characteristic (Live) Load in a Motorized Stage Rigging System,
so a Design Factor of 8:1 is required.
The Math:
Find the UBS of the chain: 3,250 ˟ 4 = 13,000 Pounds UBS
Apply the new Design Factor: 13,000 ÷ 8 = 1,625 Pounds working CAP
Physical Link Dimensions
Essential Dimensions of Chain Links
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Teqniqal Systems Teq Notes: Chain Grades
www.TheatreSafetyBlog.blogspot.com Page 7 of 7
Listed chain sizes always refer to the link diameter, i.e. the diameter of the rod of steel which forms the
chain link. The Grade of the Chain is always a raised enumeration, not a stamped recess. This keeps it
from filling with debris.
Metric EN and DIN
EN and DIN chain present the same size measurement for the diameter of the link, but vary slightly in
pitch and width. It is important to investigate all dimensions to ensure suitability or compatibility.
EN standards are specified by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and reflect a
continental metric specification. The alternative DIN standards originate from the Deutsches Institut
für Normung (German Institute for Standardization) but are found worldwide.
American Sizing
American chain sizing can quickly become confusing, with even the higher profile brands generally
failing to reference standards. Peerless (ACCO) offers a number of chains of the same nominal imperial
size in two standards, one according to their own specifications and the other adhering to an ISO
standard. The ISO versions are shorter (lesser pitch) and tend to be wider. Pay particular attention to
exact dimensions if you are trying to match-up with some other parts or existing equipment.
More information:
“Welded steel Chain Specifications”
From The National Association of Chain Manufacturers (NACM)
http://www.nacm.info/Downloads/NACM_Welded.pdf