territorial cohesion and national-regional partnership for the programming period 2007-2013
DESCRIPTION
TERRITORIAL COHESION AND NATIONAL-REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP for the programming period 2007-2013. Benchmarking Seminar on The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective, The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), The Regional State Aid Provisions (RSA). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
TERRITORIAL COHESION AND NATIONAL-REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP
for the programming period 2007-2013
Benchmarking Seminar onThe Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective,
The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD),The Regional State Aid Provisions (RSA).
Director Ulf Johansson
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions
2Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
INTRODUCTION
The Swedish setting•350 years of strong, centralised government (the “Unity State”)
•450+ very independent national agencies (so who is really in charge?)
•290 local authorities with a far reaching self government
•A renewed regional level is emerging (15 out of 21 counties have assumed a larger responsibility for regional development)
•The EU is a cooperation between heads of states
Sweden
according
to the map
Sweden
according to the
Government
3Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
INTRODUCTION
The fields of tension Democracy – Efficiency Government – Governance Inward - Transparency Status quo – Change
A new mindset is slowly emerging.
But will it lead to necessary reform?
A new mindset is slowly emerging.
But will it lead to necessary reform?
4Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
General informationNational financial allocation ERDF/ESF1 676 M€
Sweden’s national approach; •Reduce the budget! (Max 1% of GDP)
•“Old Europe” member states can take care of their own regional development funding. (Reveals an aid perspective on EU cohesion)
Regions and local authorities;
•Value added from the EU dimension can’t be denied.•A re-nationalisation of the cohesion policy is totally
unacceptable
5Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
State of play of the NSRF- Delayed 30+ days due to infighting within the Government
where two approaches meet. The regions have been deeply involved in the battle…
- Still not adopted, which will most probably cause implementation problems
- A mixed approach …
The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
General information
Minister for Communications and Regional Policy
- Decentralise!
- Improved dialogue!
- Focus on results!
Ministers for Employment and Finance
- Preserv the centralised system
- Business as usual!
- Focus on control!
6Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
Dialogue- Dialogue between the regions and the national
government when designing regional policy
- A positive break through! A round table – the National Focus Group
- No dialogue in Member State negotiations with the European Commission
The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
National – regional partnership
7Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
Participation of regions in drafting the NSRF• Informal dialogue for about one year.
• No formal partnership
• Meetings between minister responsible for NRFS and groups of regions.
• ERDF/ESF resources seen as separate entities. The regions wanted another, united approach.
• Managing and steering of ERFD and ESF separated. However included in the same NSRF.
• The drafting of the NRFS done entirely by the ministry, no transparency.
The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
National – regional partnership
8Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
National – regional partnership
National Focus Group
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
A step forward!
9Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
The map• NUTS II-level basis for the map – the result will most
probably be eight, not very functional regions
• Compared to the recent period slightly more emphasis on political influence.
• In regions with a political mandate to manage regional development -> programming and project pipeline will be the responsibility of politicians.
The Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
“Territorial cohesion” dimension
A small curiosity for a country claiming to be a democracy:
A majority of the County Administrative Boards (civil servants appointed by the State) have publicly been opposing increased political influence and claimed that they will do a better job.
10Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
The EAFRD
General information
National financial allocation- 780 M€ (national co-financing 732 M€)
Responsible authorities- Ministry of Agriculture
- National agricultural agency
- The county administrative boards (civil servants appointed by the national government)
11Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
State of play of the EARDF- The strong “agri” lobby wants to preserve strong focus on
axis one and two
- The regions wanted increased focus on axis three (Current proposal 10%) and the NSP to be coordinated with NSRF.
- Not yet adopted.
The EAFRD
General information
Minister for Communications and Regional Policy
- Decentralise more
- Coordinate more
- Allocate more resources
to rural development
Minister for Agriculture
- Need for centralised system
- Business as usual!
- Focus on control!
12Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
The EAFRD
The national – regional partnership
• Regions not involved in the negotiations between the European Commission and Sweden when designing the EARDF
• Informal dialogue on demand by the regions. No participation of regions in drafting the NSP and delivering the EARDF
• Contrary to Swedish statements in Brussels, very little (if any) shift towards rural development - Impact of Leader approach still uncertain (included in the 10% of axis three).
13Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
Regional State Aid provisions
General information
State of play State Aid
• No maps ready and most decisions will be taken this autumn.
• Currently 15,9% of the population eligible. The Swedish Government refuses to state whether their ambitions reach further than the EU 15,3% ceiling or not.
14Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
State of play State Aid
•No dialogue or active regional participation in reality, especially not in the negotiations between the EC and Sweden when selecting the zoning procedure
•Questions have been asked to some regions on their view on state aid as such.
•The Swedish Government sees state aid as something that should be abolished and treats it currently as a state secret. Refuses to give information on the subject.
Regional State Aid provisionsGeneral information
15Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
Conclusion
Compared with the previous period …+Increased political influence on regional level
- The strong sector approach preserved
- We are still struggling to increase the element of learning within the system
Lessons to be learnt …- A 350 year old system takes time to change …
- Those advocating status quo have a strong say, those who want a new paradigm need to prove that it will deliver more
16Svenska Kommunförbundet och Landstingsförbundet i samverkan
For additional information
www.skl.se
www.industry.ministry.se
www.agriculture.ministry.se