testing of new bridge rail and transition designs volume ... · this transition was tested to...

56
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE I. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. FHWA-RD-93-069 4. Title and Subtitle TESTING OF NEW BRIDGE RAIL AND TRANSITION DESIGNS Volume XII: Appendix K Oregon Transition 7. Author(s) 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date June 1997 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organization Report No. C. Eugene Buth, T. J. Hirsch, and Wanda L. Menges Research Foundation 7069-Vol. XII 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. NCP No. 3A5C0042 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-86-C-00071 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report Office of Safety & Traffic Operations R&D Federal Highway Administration August 1986 - September 1993 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, Virginia 22101-2296 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with DOT, FHWA Research Study Title: Pooled Funds Bridge Rail Study 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) - Charles F. McDevitt 16. Abstract A transition for the Oregon side-mounted thrie-beam bridge railing was developed and tested to performance level one of the 1989 Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings. Acceptable performance of the transition was demonstrated. Post spacing in the transition area is 3 ft-1 112 in (953 mm). A 12 ft-6 in (3.81 m) length of thrie-beam which curves behind the guardrail post on the approach end is used in the transition. This volume is the twelfth in a series. The other volumes in the series are: Volume I: Technical Report; Volume II: Appendix A, "Oregon Side Mounted Bridge Railing;" Volume III: Appendix B, "BR27D Bridge Railing;" Volume IV: Appendix C, "Illinois 2399-1 Bridge Railing;" Volume V: Appendix D, "32-in (813-mm) Concrete Parapet Bridge Railing;" Volume VI: Appendix E, "32-in (813-mm) New Jersey Safety Shape;" Volume VII: Appendix F, "32-in (813-mm) F-Shape Bridge Railing;" Volume VIII: Appendix G, "BR27C Bridge Railing;" Volume IX: Appendix H, "Illinois Side Mount Bridge Rail;" Volume X: Appendix I, "42-in (l.07-m) Concrete Parapet Bridge Railing;" Volume XI: Appendix J, "42-in (1.07-m) F-Shape Bridge Railing;" Volume XIII: Appendix L, "32-in (813-mm) Thrie-Beam Transition;" and Volume XIV: Appendix M, "Axial Tensile Strength of Thrie and W-Beam Terminal Connectors." 17. Key Words Bridge Rail, Longitudinal Barriers, Barrier Collision Forces, Ultimate Strength, Full-Scale Crash Tests, Highway Safety 18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages Unclassified Unclassified 55 Form DOT F 1700. 7 (8-69) 22. Price

Upload: others

Post on 02-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

I. Report No. 2. Government Accession No.

FHWA-RD-93-069 4. Title and Subtitle

TESTING OF NEW BRIDGE RAIL AND TRANSITION DESIGNS Volume XII: Appendix K Oregon Transition

7. Author(s)

3. Recipient's Catalog No.

5. Report Date

June 1997 6. Performing Organization Code

8. Performing Organization Report No.

C. Eugene Buth, T. J. Hirsch, and Wanda L. Menges Research Foundation 7069-Vol. XII 9. Performing Organization Name and Address

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

10. Work Unit No.

NCP No. 3A5C0042 11. Contract or Grant No.

DTFH61-86-C-00071 13. Type of Report and Period Covered

Final Report Office of Safety & Traffic Operations R&D Federal Highway Administration August 1986 - September 1993 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, Virginia 22101-2296

15. Supplementary Notes

Research performed in cooperation with DOT, FHW A Research Study Title: Pooled Funds Bridge Rail Study

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) - Charles F. McDevitt 16. Abstract

A transition for the Oregon side-mounted thrie-beam bridge railing was developed and tested to performance level one of the 1989 Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings. Acceptable performance of the transition was demonstrated. Post spacing in the transition area is 3 ft-1 112 in (953 mm). A 12 ft-6 in (3.81 m) length of thrie-beam which curves behind the guardrail post on the approach end is used in the transition.

This volume is the twelfth in a series. The other volumes in the series are: Volume I: Technical Report; Volume II: Appendix A, "Oregon Side Mounted Bridge Railing;" Volume III: Appendix B, "BR27D Bridge Railing;" Volume IV: Appendix C, "Illinois 2399-1 Bridge Railing;" Volume V: Appendix D, "32-in (813-mm) Concrete Parapet Bridge Railing;" Volume VI: Appendix E, "32-in (813-mm) New Jersey Safety Shape;" Volume VII: Appendix F, "32-in (813-mm) F-Shape Bridge Railing;" Volume VIII: Appendix G, "BR27C Bridge Railing;" Volume IX: Appendix H, "Illinois Side Mount Bridge Rail;" Volume X: Appendix I, "42-in (l.07-m) Concrete Parapet Bridge Railing;" Volume XI: Appendix J, "42-in (1.07-m) F-Shape Bridge Railing;" Volume XIII: Appendix L, "32-in (813-mm) Thrie-Beam Transition;" and Volume XIV: Appendix M, "Axial Tensile Strength of Thrie and W-Beam Terminal Connectors." 17. Key Words

Bridge Rail, Longitudinal Barriers, Barrier Collision Forces, Ultimate Strength, Full-Scale Crash Tests, Highway Safety

18. Distribution Statement

No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161

19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages

Unclassified Unclassified 55

Form DOT F 1700. 7 (8-69)

22. Price

Page 2: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find .Symbol Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find Symbol

LENGTH LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm mm millimeters 0.039 inches in ft feet 0.305 meters m m meters 3.28 feet ft yd yards 0.914 meters m m meters 1.09 yards yd mi miles 1.61 kilometers km km kilometers 0.621 miles mi

AREA AREA

in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 mm2 square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in2 ft' square feet 0.093 square meters m2 m2 square meters 10.764 square feet ft2 yrP square yards 0.836 square meters m2 m2 square meters 1.195 square yards yrP ac acres 0.405 hectares ha ha hectares 2.47 acres ac mil square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 km2 square kilometers . 0.386 square miles mi2

VOLUME VOLUME

_,, Ill

floz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters ml ml milliliters 0.034 fluid ounces ff oz _,, gal gallons 3.785 liters L L liters 0.264 gallons gal

ft' cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 m3 cubic meters 35.71 cubic feet ft3 ycfl cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 m3 cubic meters 1.307 cubic yards yd3

NOTE: Volumes greater than 1000 I shall be shown in m3.

MASS MASS

oz ounces 28.35 grams g g grams 0.035 ounces oz lb pounds •0.454 kilograms kg kg kilograms 2.202 pounds lb T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 megagrams Mg Mg megagrams 1.103 short tons (2000 lb) T

(or •metric ton•) (or ·r) (or ·r) (or •metric ton•) TEMPERATURE (exact) TEMPERATURE (exact)

OF Fahrenheit 5(F-32)/9 Celcius oc oc Celcius 1.8C +32 Fahrenheit OF temperature . or (F-32)11.8 temperature temperature temperature

ILLUMINATION ILLUMINA ?ION

fc toot-candles 10.76 lux Ix Ix lux 0.0929 foot-candles fc fl foot-lamberts 3.426 candela/m2 cd/m2 cdlm2 candela/m2 0.2919 foot-lambertS ft

FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS

lbf poundforce 4.45 newtons N N newtons 0.225 poundforce lbf lbf/in2 poundforce per 6.89 kilopascals kPa kPa kilo pascals 0.145 poundtorce per lbf/in2

square inch square inch

* SI is the symbol tor the International System of Units. Appropriate (Revised September 1993) rounding should be made to comply with Section 4 of ASTM E380.

Page 3: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter

1. DESIGN OF TRANSITION 1

2. CRASH TEST PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3. FULL-SCALE CRASH TESTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

TEST 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Test Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

TEST 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

Test Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 7 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 49

iii

Page 4: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No.

1. Oregon Transition (elevation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Oregon Transition (cross section) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Vehicle before test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4. Vehicle properties for test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5. Oregon transition before test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Oregon transition before test 7069-27 (rear view) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7. Oregon transition after test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8. Vehicle after test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9. Summary of results for test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

10. Sequential photographs for test 7069-27 (overhead and front views) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

11. Sequential photographs for test 7069-27 (perpendicular and interior view) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

12. Vehicle angular displacements for test 7069-27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 13. Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-27

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 14. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-27

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 15. Vehicle vertical accelerometer trace for test 7069-27

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 16. Vehicle/transition geometrics before test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 17. Vehicle before test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 18. Vehicle properties for test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 19. Oregon transition before test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 20. Oregon transition after test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 21. Vehicle after test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 22. Summary of results for test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 23. Sequential photographs for test 7069-28

(frontal and overhead .views) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 24. Sequential photographs for test 7069-28

(perpendicular and interior views) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 25. Vehicle angular displacements for test 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 26. Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-28

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 27. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-28

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 28. Vehicle vertical accelerometer trace for test 7069-28

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 29. Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-28

(accelerometer located at front of vehicle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 30. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-28

(accelerometer located at front of vehicle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

iv

Page 5: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure No.

31.

32.

LIST OF FIGURE.S (Continued)

Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at rear of vehicle) . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test. 7069-28 (accelerometer located at rear of vehicle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

v

47

48

Page 6: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Table No.

1. 2. 3.

LIST ·oF TABLES

Evaluation of crash'test no. 7069-27 Bridge railing performance levels and crash test criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . Evaluation of crash test no. 7069-28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

vi

16 17 36

Page 7: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

CHAPTER 1. DESIGN OF TRANSITION

An elevation view and cross-sections of the Oregon transition are shown in figures 1 and 2. Total height of the transition is 28 in (710 mm). The bridge rail element is a 10-gauge thrie-beam which terminates at the end of the bridge. A 12-gauge W-beam connects at this point and continues straight through the transition. An additional 10-gauge thrie-beam element is connected behind the W-beam at the end of the bridge and extends straight for 6 ft-3 in (1.9 m), then curves to the field side on an 11 112 ft (3.5 m) radius for a distance of 6 ft-3 in (1.9 m). Timber posts 8 in by 8 in by 6 ft 0 in (203 mm by 203 mm by 1.83 m) timber posts and blockouts spaced at 3 ft-1 112 in (1 m) are used in the transition.

Because transition rails are flexible and most bridge rails are either rigid or semi-rigid, guardrail-to-bridge rail transitions must be designed to prevent impacting vehicles from deflecting the guardrail sufficiently to allow vehicle snagging on the end of the rigid bridge railing. Curving the thrie-beam away from the traffic face creates an area that provides smooth transition from lower stiffness of the W-beam guardrail to higher stiffness of the thrie­beam bridge rail. Consequently, an impacting vehicle is prevented from snagging along the transition and sustaining high levels of damage or injury. In addition, curving the thrie-beam prevents the vehicle from snagging on the end of the thrie-beam itself.

1

Page 8: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

I

N

"

1--------------- GUARD RAIL TRANsmoN 12'-6"

EXISTING STRUCTURE

i-------- 6'-3" lYP. --------! 3/+"

1-10GA. THRIE BEAM

v

W 6x15

v

E-63(406'-3"=25'-0" CLASS A,lYPE 2)-76 ~ 1 - 10 GA. THRIE BEAM

I I

~ ,o t , I I

C> I I I I

I I //

------

SPLICE SPLICE BO

l-r bf ..

,o ' I Cl I Cl'

... 01 ""'

I I

1-10GA. THRIE BEAM (SEE DETAIL C, SHEET 2 Of' 2) AND 1-12GA. W-BEAM (STRAIGHT')

4 SPACES 0 3'-1 1/2"

8"x8"x6'-0" TIMBER POST & BLOCK (lYP .)

PLAN L-s A

L!f /4"]

-- -I I I I

'Q' • C> t

I I I I

a a I I I I

I I \ I I

1-12GA. W-BEAM

-- --="--II I

Q Q

I I

I

W-BEAM ANO THRIE-BEAM SPLICE f G) \ ® ., y 1 - 10 GA. CURVED THRl£-,.8£AM POST NUMBER

~ ELEVATION EXISTING STRUCTURE

.... -----I 1 in = 25 .4 mm I

Figure 1. Oregon Transition (elevation).

,

Page 9: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

BOLT (F-3(18"]-76 WITH WASHER (F-13-73) UNDER NUT.

SECTION A-A

RECTANGULAR WASHER (f-12-73)

1 in= 25.4 mm

8" x8" x 1 • -1 o" BLOCK

f 7 5/8"

l 7. S/Ef'

l

1 3/Ef' J

BOLT (F-.3(14")-76) WITH WASHER (F-13-73) UNDER NUT.

SECTION B-8

1/2"

1·-0·

HOLES IN RAIL ELEMENT SPECIAL 3/4" x 2 1/2" SLOTTED

SECTION C-C

Figure 2. Oregon Transition (cross section).

3

Page 10: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements
Page 11: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

CHAPTER 2. CRASH TEST PROCEDURES

This transition was tested to performance level one requirements.<1) The following nominal test conditions were used:

1,800-lb (817-kg) passenger car I 50 mi/h (80.5 km/h)) I 20 degrees (test 7069-27) 5,400-lb (2 452-kg) pickup I 45 mi/h (72.5 km/h) I 20 degrees (test 7069-28)

The test vehicles were instrumented with three solid-state angular rate transducers to measure yaw, pitch and roll rates; a triaxial accelerometer at the vehicle center-of-gravity to measure longitudinal, lateral, and vertical acceleration levels, and a back-up biaxial accelerometer in the rear of the vehicle to measure longitudinal and lateral acceleration levels. The accelerometers were strain gauge type with a linear millivolt output proportional to acceleration.

The electronic signals from the accelerometers and transducers were transmitted to a base station by means of constant bandwidth FM/FM telemetry link for recording on magnetic tape and for display on a real-time strip chart. Provision was made for the transmission of calibration signals before and after the test, and an accurate time reference signal was simultaneously recorded with the data. Pressure sensitive contact switches on the bumper were actuated just prior to impact by wooden dowels to indicate the elapsed time over a known distance to provide a measurement of impact velocity. The initial contact also produced an "event" mark on the data record to establish the exact instant of contact with the transition.

The multiplex of data channels transmitted on one radio frequency was received at a data acquisition station and demultiplexed into separate tracks of Intermediate Range Instrumentation Group (LR.LG.) tape recorders. After the test, the data were played back from the tape machines, filtered with an SAE 1211 Class 180 filter, and digitized using a microcomputer for analysis and evaluation of impact performance. · The digitized data were then processed using two computer programs: DIGITIZE and PLOTANGLE. Brief descriptions on the functi~ns of these two computer programs are as follows.

The DIGITIZE program uses digitized data from vehicle-mounted linear accelerometers to compute occupant/compartment impact velocities, time of occupant/compartment impact after vehicle impact, and the highest 0.010-s average ridedown acceleration. The DIGITIZE program also calculates a vehicle impact velocity and the change in vehicle velocity at the end of a given impulse period. In addition, maximum average accelerations over 0.050-s intervals in each of the three directions are computed. Acceleration versus time curves for the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions are then plotted from the digitized data of the vehicle-mounted linear accelerometers using a commercially available software package (QUATTRO PRO). For each of these graphs, a 0.050-s average window was calculated at the center of the 0.050-s interval and plotted with the first 0.050-s average plotted at 0. 026 s.

5

Page 12: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

The PLOTANGLE program uses the digitized data from the yaw, pitch, and roll rate charts to compute angular displacement in degrees at 0.00067-s intervals and then instructs a plotter to draw a reproducible plot: yaw, pitch, and roll versus time. It should be noted that these angular displacements are sequence dependent with the sequence being yaw-pitch-roll for the data presented herein. These displacements are in reference to the vehicle-fixed coordinate system with the initial position and orientation of the vehicle-fixed coordinate system being that which existed at initial impact.

An Alderson Research Laboratories Hybrid II, 50th percentile male anthropometric dummy restrained with lap and shoulder belts was placed in the driver position of each vehicle. The dummy was un-instrumented; however, a high-speed onboard camera recorded the motions of the dummy during the test sequence.

Photographic coverage of the tests included four high-speed cameras: one over head with a field of view perpendicular to the ground and directly over the impact point, one placed to have a field of view parallel to and aligned with the transition at the downstream end, and a third placed perpendicular to the front of the transition. A high-speed camera was also placed onboard the vehicles to record the motions of the dummy placed in the driver position during the test sequences. A flash bulb activated by pressure sensitive tape switches was positioned on. the impacting vehicle to indicate the instant of contact with the transition and was visible from each camera. The films from these high-speed cameras were analyzed on a computer-linked motion analyzer to observe phenomena occurring during the collision and to obtain time-event, displacement and angular data. A 16-mm movie cine, a professional video camera, and a 3/4-in (19-mm) videotape recorder along with 35-mm still cameras were used for documentary purposes and to record conditions of the test vehicle and transition before and after the tests.

The test vehicles were towed into the test installation using a steel cable guidance and reverse tow system. A steel cable for guiding each vehicle was stretched along the path, anchored at each end, and threaded through an attachment to the front wheel of the test vehicle. Another steel cable was connected to the test vehicle, passed around a pulley near the impact point, through a pulley on the tow vehicle, and then anchored to the ground such that the tow vehicle mov~d away from the test. site. A 2-to-l speed ratio between the test and tow vehicle existed with this system. Immediately prior to impact with the transition, the test vehicles were released to be free-wheeling and unrestrained. The vehicles remained free­wheeling, i.e., no steering or braking inputs, until they cleared the immediate area of the test site, at which time brakes on them were activated to bring them to safe and controlled stops.

6

Page 13: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

CHAPTER 3. FULL-SCALE CRASH TESTS

TEST 7069-27

Test Description

A 1983 Honda Civic (figure 3) was used for the crash test. Test inertia mass of the vehicle was 1,800 lb (817 kg) and its gross static mass was 1,970 lb (894 kg). The height to the lower edge of the vehicle bumper was 13.0 in (330 mm) and it was 18.75 in (476 mm) to the top of the bumper. Additional dimensions and information on the test vehicle are given in figure 4. The vehicle was directed into the Oregon transition (figures 5 and 6) using the cable reverse tow and guidance system and was released to be free-wheeling and unrestrained just prior to impact. The vehicle impacted the transition 5 ft (1.5 m) from the end of the bridge deck at a speed of 51.6 mi/h (83.0 km/h) and the angle of impact was 19.9 degrees.

At 0.017 s after impact, the bumper of the vehicle began to shift to the right and at 0.029 s the front of the vehicle began to deform to the right. The vehicle began to redirect at 0.050 s after impact and at the same time the vehicle contacted post 1. By 0.133 s the vehicle was traveling parallel to the transition at a speed of 44.9 mi/h (72.2 km/h), and at 0.150 s the rear of the vehicle impacted the transition at the post 2 location. At 0.176 s the shoulder of the dummy shattered the window glass on the driver side. The vehicle lost contact with the transition at 0.245 s traveling at 44.3 mi/h (71.3 km/h) and 9.1 degrees. The brakes were applied at 1.4 s after impact and subsequently came to rest 105 ft (32 m) from the point of impact, resting against another barrier.

As can be seen in figure 7, the transition received minimal damage. Maximum lateral permanent deformation was 0.5 in (13 mm). The vehicle was in contact with the transition for 9.0 ft (2. 7 m).

The vehicle sustained damage to the left side as shown in figure 8. Maximum crush at the left front corner at bumper height was 8.0 in (203 mm) and the driver door was deformed outward approximately 8.0 in (203 mm). The driver side window was broken out and the door was jammed. Also, druµage was done to the front ]?umper, hood, grill, left fron~ quarter panel, left rear quarter panel, and left front tire and rim.

Test Results

Impact speed was 51.6 mi/h (83.0 km/h) and the angle of impact was 19.9 degrees. The speed of the vehicle at time of parallel was 44.9 mi/h (72.2 km/h) and the coefficient of friction was 0.21. The vehicle lost contact with the transition traveling at 44.3 mi/h (71.3 km/h) and the exit angle between the vehicle path and the transition was 9.1 degrees. Data from the accelerometer located at the center-of-gravity were digitized for evaluation and occupant risk factors were computed as follows. In the longitudinal direction, occupant impact velocity was 13.l ft/s (4.0 mis) at 0.221 s, the highest 0.010-s average ridedown acceleration was 1.0 g between 0.224 and 0.234 s, and the maximum 0.050-s average acceleration was -5.3 g between 0.039 and 0.089 s. Lateral occupant impact velocity was

7

Page 14: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

23.7 ft/s (7.2 mis) at 0.103 s, the highest 0.010-s occupant ridedown acceleration was -9.6 g between 0 .161 and 0 .171 s, and the maximum 0. 050-s average acceleration was -10. 9 g between 0.041 and 0.091 s. The change in vehicle velocity at loss of contact was 7.3 mi/h (11.7 km/h) and the change in momentum was 598 lb-s (2,662 N-s). These data and other pertinent information from the test are summarized in figure 9 and tables 1 and 2. Sequential photographs are shown in figures 10 and 11. Vehicular angular displacements are displayed in figure 12. Vehicular accelerations versus time traces filtered at SAE J21 l (Class 180) are presented in figures 13 through 15.

Conclusions

The transition contained the test vehicle with minimal lateral movement of the transition. There was no intrusion of transition components into the occupant compartment. The vehicle remained upright and relatively stable during the collision. The transition redirected the vehicle and the effective coefficient of friction was considered good. Velocity change of the vehicle during the collision was 7.3 mi/h (11.7 km/h).

The 1989 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide Specifications For Bridge Railings sets forth required limits for occupant risk factors for tests with the 1,800-lb vehicle.<1) The AASHTO specifications recommend a limit of 30 ft/s (9.2 mis) for longitudinal occupant impact velocity and 25 ft/s (7.6 mis) for the lateral occupant impact velocity. The occupant impact velocities and the occupant ridedown accelerations were within the limits. The vehicle trajectory at loss of contact indicates minimum intrusion into adjacent traffic lanes. See figure 9 and table 1 for more details.

8

Page 15: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 3. Vehicle before test 7069-27.

9

Page 16: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Date: 6-16-92 Test No. : 7069~27 VIN: JHMSL 4316DSQ11122

Make: Honda Model: Civic 1300 Year: 1983 Odometer:l32048 -----Tire Size: J55RJ2 Ply Rating: ___ _ Bias Ply: Belted: Radial: _x_

1 t a p

L_

Tire dia----t-4-""""""'"'~ Wheel dia-----

j

4-wheel weight for e.g. det. £.f 586

f

rf 554

Accelerometers

92.75 11

_j_ T

Accelerometers

lr 332 rr 328

Tire Condition: good fair _x_

111 1 eft H=29.25 11

badly worn

Vehicle Geometry - inches

a 62.25 11

b 29.50 11

c 88.25 11 d* 52.50:1

e 29.Q0 11 f li.6.a.5.~

g h 32.36 11

j 27.00 11

k 16. 00') l 35.00 11

m 18. 75 11 n 3. 25 11

0 13.00" p 53. 75 11

r 21. 75" s 13.18 11

Engine Type: V-4 Gas Engine CID: 91C1D Transmission Type:

Automatic or Manual FWD or RWD or 4WD

Body Type: 3 door Mass - pounds Curb Test Inertial Gross Static Steering Column Collapse

Mechanism: Ml 1157 1140

Mz 628 . 660

MT 1785 1800

Note any damage to vehicle prior to test:

*d = overall height of vehicle

1 in= 25.4 mm 1 lb = .454 kg

1222

748

1970

Behind wheel units -Convo 1 u ted tu be · -Cylindrical mesh units -Embedded ba l l -NOT collapsible -Other energy absorption -Unknown

Brakes: Front: disc_x_ drum_ Rear: disc drum X

Figure 4. Vehicle properties for test 7069-27.

10

Page 17: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 5. Oregon transition before test 7069-27.

11

Page 18: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 6. Oregon transition before test 7069-27 (rear view).

12

Page 19: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

~>1:r~-·-;: "'~' ~~~;;~t

Figure 7. Oregon transition after test 7069-27.

13

Page 20: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 8. Vehicle after test 7069-27.

14

Page 21: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

....... 01

2 '-7"

~

6 '-6"

(1 in = 25.4 mm)

Test No .... Date . . . . .

. 7069-27

. 06/16/92

Test Installation ... Oregon Thrie-beam Transition

Installation Length •. 85 ft (26 m)

Test Vehicle ...... 1983 Honda Civic Vehicle Weight

Test Inertia ..... 1,800 lb (817 kg) Gross Static ..... 1,970 lb (894 kg)

Vehicle Damage Classification TAD ... ~ . . . . . 11LFQ4 & llLDl CDC ......... 11FLEK2 & 11LDEW3

Maximum Vehicle Crush . 8.0 in (203 mm}

Impact Speed .... 51.6 mi/h (83.o· km/h) Impact Angle .... 19.9 deg Speed at Parallel . 44.9 mi/h (72.2 km/h) Exit Speed .... 44.3 mi/h (71.3 km/h) Exit Trajectory .. 9.1 deg Vehicle Accelerations

(Max. 0.050-sec Avg) at true e.g. Longitudinal ... -5.3 g Lateral ..... -10.9 g

Occupant Impact Velocity at true e.g. Longitudinal ... 13.1 ft/s (4.0 m/s) Later a 1 . . . . . 23 . 7 ft/ s ( 7 . 2 m/ s )

Occupant Ridedown Accelerations Longitudinal . . 1.0 g Lateral ..... -9.6 g

Figure 9. Summary of results for test 7069-27.

Page 22: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

t-1 ~

A.

B.

c.

D.

E.

F.

Table I. Evaluation of crash test no. 7069-27. {Oregon transition [l,800 lb (817 kg) 151.6 mi/h (83.0 km/h) 119.9 degrees]}

CRITERIA

Must cont~in vehicle

Debris shall not penetrate passenger compartment

Passenger compartment must have essentially no deformation

Vehicle must remain upright

Must smoothly redirect the vehicle

Effective coefficient of friction

u 0 - • 25 .26 - .35 > .35

Assessment Good Fair· Marginal

TEST RESULTS -· - -

Vehicle was contained

No debris penetrated passenger compartment

No deformation

Vehicle did remain upright

Vehicle was smoothly redirected

.JL .21

Assessment Good

-

G. Shall be less than

Occupant Impact Velocity - ft/s (m/s) Occupant Impact Velocity - ft/s (m/s) Longitudinal Lateral Longitudinal Lateral

30 (9.2) 25 (7.6) 13.1 (4.0) 23.7 (7.2)

Occupant Ridedown Accelerations - g's Occupant Ridedown Accelerations - g's Longitudinal Lateral Longitudinal Lateral

15 15 1.0 -9.6

H. Exit angle shall be less than 12 Exit angle was 9.1 degrees degrees

*A, B, C, D and G are required. E, F, and H are desired. (See table 2)

PASS/FAIL*

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Page 23: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Table 2. Bridge railing performance levels and crash test criteria. (Excerpt from 1989 AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings)O>

TEST SPEEDS-mph1•2

TEST VEHICLE DESCRIPTIONS AND IMPACT ANGLES

Medium Small Pickup Single-Unit Van-Type

Automobile Truck Truck Tractor-Trailer4

PERFORMANCE LEVELS W = 1.8 Kips W = 5.4 Kips W = 18.0 Kips W = 50.0 Kips A= 5.4' ± 0.1' A= 8.5' ± 0.1' A= 12.8' ± 0.2' A= 12.5' ± 0.5' B=5.5' B=6.5' B=7.5' B = 8.0'

Hcg=20"± 1" Hcg = 27'' ± l" Hcg=49"± 1" Hcg = See Note 4 0 = 20 deg. 0 = 20 deg. 6 = 15 deg. R = 0.61 ± 0.01

e = 15 deg.

PL-1 50 45

PL-2 60 60 50

PL-3 60 60 50

CRASH TEST Required a, b, c, d, g a, b, c, d a, b, c a, b, c

EVALUATION CRITERIA3 Desirable5 e, f, h e, f, g, h d, e, f, h d, e, f, h

Notes: 1. Except as noted, all full-scale tests shall be conducted and reported in accordance with the requirements in

NCHRP Report No. 230. In addition, the maximum loads that can be transmitted from the bridge railing to the bridge deck are to be determined from static force measurements or ultimate strength analysis and reported.

2. Permissible tolerances on the test speeds and angles are as follows:

Speed -1.0 mph + 2.5 mph Angle -1.0 deg. +2.5 deg.

Tests that indicate acceptable railing performance but that exceed the allowable upper tolerances will be accepted.

3. Criteria for evaluating bridge railing crash test results are as follows: a. The test article shall contain the vehicle; neither the vehicle nor its cargo shall penetrate or go over the

installation. Controlled lateral deflection of the test article is acceptable. b. Detached elements~ fragments, or other debris frorri the test article shall not penetrate or show potential

for penetrating the passenger compartment or present undue hazard to other traffic. c. Integrity of the passenger compartment must be maintained with no intrusion and essentially no defor­

mation. d. The vehicle shall remain upright during and after collision. e. The test article shall smoothly redirect the vehicle. A redirection is deemed smooth if the rear of the

vehicle or, in the case of a combination vehicle, the rear of the tractor or trailer does not yaw more than 5 degrees away from the railing from time of impact until the vehicle separates from the railing.

f. The smoothness of the vehicle-railing interaction is further assessed by the effective coefficient of friction, µ.:

µ. Assessment

0-0.25 Good 0.26--0.35 Fair

>0.35 Marginal

where µ = ( cose - VP N)/sin6

17

Page 24: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Table 2. Bridge railing performance levels and crash test criteria. C?xcerpt from 1989 AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge RaUings)(l)

(continued)

g. The impact velocity of a hypothetical front-seat passenger against the vehicle interior, calculated from vehicle accelerations and 2.0-ft. longitudinal and 1.0-ft. lateral diplacements, shall be less than:

Occupant Impact Velocity-fps

Longitudinal

30

Lateral

25

and the vehicle highest 10-ms average accelerations subsequent to the instant of hypothetical passenger impact should be less than:

Occupant Ridedown Acceleration-g's

Longitudinal Lateral

15 15

h. Vehicle exit angle from the barrier shall not be·more than 12 degrees. Within 100 ft. plus the length of the test vehicle from the point of initial impact with the railing, the railing side of the vehicle shall move no more than 20-ft. from the line of the traffic face of the railing. The brakes shall not be applied until the vehicle has traveled at least 100-ft. plus the length of the test vehicle from the point of initial impact.

4. Values A and R are estimated values describing the test vehicle and its loading. Values of A and R are described in the figure below and calculated as follows:

----- 45.0' ---1 Min. Load= 20.5 Kips

L1=30'' ± l"

Li+ i= 169"±4"

4.5' Approx. (Rear most setting.)

~' (Load) = 92" Approx. Reg (Trailer & Load) = 79" ± l"

Hcg (Tractor, Trailer,·~ Load) = 64" ± 2" . .

R= W1+W2+W3 w

W = W1 + W2 + W3 + W4 + Ws =total vehicle weight.

5. Test articles that do not meet the desirable evaluation criteria shall have their performance evaluated by a designated authority that will decide whether the test article is likely to meet its intended use requirements.

1 mi= 1.61 km 1 kip = 4.45 kN 1 in= 25.4 mm

18

Page 25: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0.000 s

0.036 s

0. 071 s

0.107 s

Figure 10. Sequential photographs for test 7069-27 (overhead and front views).

19

Page 26: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0 .143 s

0 .179 s

0.214 s

0.250 s

Figure 10. Sequential photographs for test 7069-27 (overhead and. front views continued).

20

Page 27: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0.000 s

0.036 s

0. 071 s

0 .107 s

Figure 11. Sequential photographs for test 7069-27 (perpendicular and interior view).

21

Page 28: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0~143 s

0.179 s

0.214 s

0.250 s

Figure 116 sequential photographs for test 7069-27 (perpendicular and interior view continued).

22

Page 29: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

8.0

4.0

(/) 0.0 Q.) Q.) (.,

-4.0 Cl Q) 0

N -w -8.0 .µ c Q.) -12 .0 E Q)

u ro -16.0 r-i

0. (/)

·r-t -20.0 0

-24.0

-28.0 0.0

7069-27

I Yaw >< Pitch 0 Rolf

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Ti me (Seconds)

1 · ;'

~•i'llCll ,,..fr..:,'AW ~ Q~ 9· ~~~~:ZJ

PA3.08

~/-' ,,.011

-- I '----"' Axes are vehicle fixed. Sequence for determining orientation is:

1. Yaw 2. Pitch 3. Roll

Figure 12. .Vehicle angular displacements for test 7069-27.

Page 30: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

'Ji' s z 0

~ ~ w u ~ _,

N < ~ z

0 ::> t-(!) z g

CRASH TEST 706·9-27 Accelerometer at center-of-gravity

ao--~--~~-~~~~~~~--.-~~~~~~~~~--:--~~~~~~~~--:~~~~--,

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: 1983 Honda CMc Test Inertia Weight: 1,800 lb Gross Static Weight: 1,970 lb Test Speed: 51.6 mi/h Test Angle: 19.9 degrees

o..+.,; . -- . .;.._ _i '"•~ 4iJ.·'1Ai~~ >~' ' ~ ., , "" 1------------+--------------4--------·----~--------------

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

TIME AFTER. IMPACT (SECONDS)

1-· Class 1 eo Fiiter - so-msec Average j

Figure 13. Vehicle. longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-27 (accelerometer located at center-of-gravity).

Page 31: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

N U'1

CRASH TEST 7069-27 Accelerometer at center-of-gravity

80------------~--------------~~--------....-------~..----~~----,----~--~----------,

70-t·································t·································t·································t·································t································;t········· Test Article: .Oregon Transition

60-4 i I I i l Test Vehicle: 1983 Honda CMc

so ::~:~~::::~~~~~~~~r~~:=~=~~~I~~:~~~~~~:~~::::[::::~~~~::::::~:~I:~:~::~:~:~:~:~:~:I:~: ~s~~w;:lt 1

;~: ~ _ l l ! ! j Test Speed: 51.6 mi/h

i ~ ~~~~~~~~~l~~~~~~l~~~~~f ~~~~~~~~f~~~=~~~~~~=~==~==~ ~ 1 -------=-~-------i--------~---------t~~~~=~~~~=j~~~~ ...J j i j j

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0. 7 0.8

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1- Class 1 ea Filter - so-msec Average I Figure 14. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-27

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity).

Page 32: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

N O'\

CRASH TEST 7069~27 Acceleromete,r at center-of-gravity

80

70

60

50 y;

==~~~:~-~~~:I:~=~~:~:~:~~:~I~:~~~~~::~~:~:~I:~~~=~~~:~:~:~:~I:~:~~~:~:~~:~J:~:::: ~:: ~~:= ~~00~=~~c ....... . l ! ! ! ! Test Inertia Weight: 1,800 lb

................................. 1 ................................. 1 ................................. 1 .................................. t ................................ l........ Gross Static Weight: 1,970 lb l · l l l l Test Speed: 51.6 mi/h

.9 40 z 0 30

~ 20 w _J w 10 (.)

~ 0 _J

~ -10 ----·-·--···--·~~:~::~:.~.~~~-;~~.~~=·-~~~f :~=~~~~~~:~~:1~:~:=~:~~:~~~~r~~~~~~:~~:~~1~:~:~=~:~~:~~~: ~ w >

-20

-30

-40

····················-············+·································•·································•··································•·································¥·································¥·············· .. ··················•··································

________ J ___ ·---···--· __ J _________ _J_·-······--··-···-_J-·--·---··--·-L·-··--·-·-·---.1._. __ . ____ . __ J _________ _ ········--·········-···-···..L.·······-·-····-······-.J··········-··-·-·-·-····J.··--·······-·······-··-····'······-····-··················J.·-·-···········-···-·-J···-·-····-·---········...l.·········"'-··-················ : : : : : : : ................................. l ................................. 1 ................................. 1 .................................. L ................................ l ................................. l .................................. t ................................ . -50

_00

! I ! I I ! I 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0. 7 0.8

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

l--=.-c1ass 1 EIO Fiiter - 5CHnsec Average I Figure 15. Vehicle vertical accelerometer trace for test 7069-27

(accelerometer located at center-of-gravity).

Page 33: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

TEST 7069-28

Test ·Description

A 1985 Chevrolet C-20 pickup (figures 16 and 17) was used for the crash test. Test inertia mass of the vehicle was 5,400 lb (2 452 kg) and its gross static mass was 5,565 lb (2 527 kg). The height to the lower edge of the vehicle bumper was 17.75 in (451 mm) and it was 26.75 in (679 mm) to the top of the bumper. Additional dimensions and information on the test vehicle are given in figure 18. The vehicle was directed into the Oregon transition (figure 19) using the cable reverse tow and guidance system and was released to be free-wheeling and unrestrained just prior to impact. The vehicle impacted the transition 7 ft (2.1 m) from the end of the bridge deck at a speed of 47.7 mi/h (76.7 km/h) and the angle of impact was 19. 0 degrees.

The vehicle began to redirect at 0.062 s after impact, and at 0.129 the right front tire left the roadway. By 0.192 s the vehicle was traveling parallel to the transition at a speed of 45.5 mi/h (73.2 km/h), and at 0.205 s the rear of the vehicle impacted the transition. The transition reached a maximum deflection of 0.9 ft at 0.271 s after impact and the right rear wheel lost contact with the roadway at 0.298 s. The vehicle lost contact with the transition at 0.370 s traveling at 42.8 mi/h (68.9 km/h) and 8.9 degrees. The right side of the vehicle regained contact with the roadway at 0.576 s. The brakes were applied at 1.5 s after impact and subsequently came to rest 285 ft (87 m) down from and 98 ft (30 m) in front of the point of impact.

As can be seen in figure 20, the transition received minimal damage. Maximum lateral permanent deformation was 3.5 in (89 mm). The vehicle was in contact with the transition for 14.0 ft ( 4.3 m).

The vehicle sustained damage to the left side as shown in figure 21. Maximum crush at the left front corner at bumper height was 8.0 in (203 mm) and the driver door was deformed outward approximately 1.0 in (25 mm). The frame was bent and the cab was deformed. The driver side window was broken out and the door was jammed. Also, damage was done to the front bumper, hood, grill, left front quarter panel, left rear quarter panel, rear bumper and left front tire and rim.

Test Results

Impact speed was 47.7 mi/h (76.7 km/h) and the angle of impact was 19.0 degrees. The speed of the vehicle at time of parallel was 45.5 mi/h (73.2 km/h) and the coefficient of friction was 0.02. The vehicle lost contact with the transition traveling at 42.8 mi/h (68.9 km/h), and the exit angle between the vehicle path and the transition was 8.9 degrees. Data . from the accelerometer located at the center-of-gravity were digitized for evaluation and occupant risk factors were computed as follows. In the longitudinal direction, occupant impact velocity was 7.2 ft/s (2.2 mis) at 0.373 s, the highest 0.010-s average ridedown acceleration was 1.1 g between 0.389 and 0.399 s, and the maximum 0.050-s average acceleration was -2.2 g between 0.069 and 0.119 s. Lateral occupant impact velocity was

27

Page 34: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

16.2 ft/s (4.9 mis) at 0.161 s, the highest 0.010-s occupant ridedown acceleration was -9.6 g between 0.257 and 0.267 s, and the maximum 0.050-s average acceleration was -7.3 g between 0.076 and 0.126 s. The change in vehicle velocity at loss of contact was 4.9 mi/h (7.8 km/h), and the change in momentum was 231 lb-s (1,029 N-s). These data and other pertinent information from the test are summarized in figure 22 and table 3. Sequential photographs are shown in figures 23 and 24. Vehicular angular displacements are displayed in figure 25. Vehicular accelerations versus time traces filtered at SAE J211 (Class 180) are presented in figures 26 through 32.

Conclusions

The transition contained the test vehicle with minimal lateral movement of the transition. There was no intrusion of railing components into the occupant compartment. The vehicle remained upright and relatively stable during the collision. The transition redirected the vehicle and the effective coefficient of friction was considered good. Velocity change of the vehicle during the collision was 4.9 mi/h (7.9 km/h).

The 1989 AASHTO guide specifications sets forth desired but not required limits for occupant risk factors for tests with the 5,400-lb (2 452-kg) vehicle.(!) The AASHTO specifications recommend a limit of 30 ft/s (9.2 mis) for longitudinal occupant impact velocity and 25 ft/s (7.6 mis) for the lateral occupant impact velocity. The occupant impact velocities and the occupant ridedown accelerations were within the limits. The vehicle trajectory at loss of contact indicated minimum intrusion into adjacent traffic lanes. See figure 22 and table 3 for more details.

28

Page 35: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 16. Vehicle/transition geometrics before test 7069-28.

29

Page 36: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 17. Vehicle before test 7069-28.

30

Page 37: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Date: 6-18-92 Test No.: 7069-28 VIN: 1GCGC24M2FF406382

Make: Chevy Model: Custom Deluxe 20Year: 1985 ----

Tire Size: l T 2lS/8SR16 Ply Rating: Bias Ply:

Accelerometers

a

I 16711

II(

j

4-wheel weight for e.g. det. lf 1248 rf 1231 .tr 1411 rr 1510

Mass - pounds Curb Test Inertial

Ml 2531 2479

M2 1899 2921

MT 4430 5400

Note any damage to vehicle prior to test:

*A = nvPrall height of vehicle

1 in= 25.4 mm 1 lb = .454 kg

Gross Static

2575

2990

5565

Odometer: 71956 -----

Belted: Radial: x

Tire Condition: good __ fair x

badly worn

Vehicle Geometry - inches

a 70.75 11 b 32"

c 131" 4* Zl. 25"

e 52" f

g h 70.9 11

j 45 Z5"

k 30.75 11 l 72.5 11

m 26.Z5" n 3 511

0 17.75 11 p 66 11

r 30.5 11 s 17.5"

Engine ·rype: 8 Cyl GasolinA. 5. 7 liter Engine CID:

Transmission Type: Automatic or Manual

'A1W< or RWD or JtWll

Body Type: Pic~-up

Steering Column Collapse Mechanism:

.. ,Behind wheel units ~Convoluted tube ~Cylindrical mesh units -Embedded ba 11 -NOT collapsible .~Other energy absorption -Unknown

Brakes: F~ont: disc2_ drum_ Rear: disc_· drum_x_

Figure 18. Vehicle properties for test 7069-28.

31

Page 38: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 19. Oregon transition before test 7069-28.

32

Page 39: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

. ..., .. ·,

Figure 20. Oregon transition after test 7069-28.

33

Page 40: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

Figure 21. Vehicle after test 7069-28.

34

Page 41: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

w U1

2 '-7'~

~~_. ! ! I 6 '-6"

(1 in = 25.4 mm)

Test No ......... 7069-28 Date . . . . . . . . . . 06/18/92

Test Installation ... Oregon Thrie-beam Transition

Installation Length .. 85 ft (26 m)

Test Vehicle· ...... 1985 Chevrolet Vehicle Weight C-20 Pickup

Test Inertia ..... 5,400 lb (2,452 kg) Gross Static ..... 5,565 lb (2,527 kg)

Vehicle Damage Classification TAD . . . . . . . . . 11LFQ2 & 11LD2 CDC ......... 11FLEK2 & 11LDEW3

Maximum Vehicle Crush . 8.0 in (203 mm)

Impact Speed .... 47.7 mi/h (76.7 km/h) Impact Angle .... 19.0 deg Speed at Parallel . 45.5 mi/h (73.2 km/h) Exit Speed .... 42.8 mi/h (68.9 km/h) Exit Trajectory . . 8.9 deg Vehicle Accelerations

(Max. 0.050-sec Avg) at true e.g. Longitudinal ... -2.2 g Lateral ..... -7.3 g

Occupant Impact Velocity at true e.g. Longitudinal ... 7.2 ft/s (2.2 m/s) Lateral ..... 16.2 ft/s (4.9 m/s)

Occupant Ridedown Accelerations Longitudinal . . 1.1 g Lateral ..... -9.6 g

Figure 22. Summary of results for test 7069-28.

Page 42: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

w °'

A.

B.

c.

D.

E.

F.

Table 3. Evaluation of crash test no. 7069-28. {Oregon transition [5,400 lb (2 452 kg)l47.7 mi/h (76.7 km/h)jl9.0 degrees]}

CRITERIA

Must contain vehicle

Debris shall not penetrate passenger compartment

Passenger compartment must have essentially no deformation

Vehicle must remain upright

Must smoothly redirect the vehicle

Effective coefficient of friction

L!. Assessment 0 - .25 Good . 26 - .35 Fair . > .35 Marginal

TEST RESULTS

Vehicle was contained

No debris penetrated passenger compartment

No deformation

Vehicle did remain upright

Vehicle was smoothly redirected

-1L .02

Assessment Good

G. Shall be less than

Occupant Impact Velocity - ft/s {m/s) Occupant Impact Velocity - ft/s (m/s) Longitudinal Lateral Longitudinal Lateral

30 (9.2} 25 (7.6) 7.2 (2.2) 16.2 (4.9)

Occupant R dedown Accelerations - g's Occupant Ridedown Accelerations - q's Longitud nal Lateral Longitudinal Lateral

15 15 1.1 -9.6

H. Exit angle shall be less than 12 Exit angle was 8.9 degrees degrees

* A, B, C, and D are required. E, F, G, and H are desired. (See table 2)

PASS/FAIL*

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Page 43: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0.049 s

0.099 s

0.150 $

Figure 23. Sequential photographs for test 7069-28 (frontal and overhead views).

37

Page 44: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0.200 s

0.249 s

0.325 s

0.402 s

Figure 23. Sequential photographs for test 7069-28 (frontal and overhead views cootinued).

38

Page 45: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

~··-~'"'·1

·~~4 0.000 s

0.049 s

0.099 s

~ .. ~

0 .150 s

Figure 24. Sequential photographs for test 7069-28 (perpendicular and interior views).

39

Page 46: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

0.200 s

0.249 s

0.325 s

OA02 s

Figure 24. Sequential photographs for test 7069-28 (perpendicular and interior views continued).

40

Page 47: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

10.0

5.0

(/) 0.0 (1) (1)

'- -5.0 O> (1)

0 -..i::=. -10.0 ...... ..µ

c (1) -15.0 E (1)

u co -20.0

r-1

Cl. (/) ·r-t -25.0 0

-30.0

-35.0 0.0

7069-28

I Yaw X Pitch 0 Roll

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Time (Seconds)

1 ·l

. ·'\ •Yl\W '"" r.11 I

~~ GD ~.;!-----6»0-----~~ ~J .~ .... , ~;.:S /j) \.\.

~~1<, '""

PA3.08

Axes are vehicle fixed. Sequence for determining orientation is:

1. Yaw 2. Pitch 3. Ro 11

Figure 25. Vehicle angular displacements for test 7069-28.

Page 48: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

80

70

60

'Ji" -2?

50

z 40 0

~ 30 w _J 20 w (.)

~ 10

~

_J 0 N

<( z c -10 :::> t-

-20 ~ z g -30

-40

-50

-60 0

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at center-of-gravity

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: · 1985 Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47.7 mi/h Test Angle: 19.0 degrees

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1-· Class 1 eo filter - 60-msec Average j

Figure 26. Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at center-of-gravity).

0.7

•···

•···

•···

0.8

Page 49: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

..p. w

80

70

60

50 -.. U> 40 C> -z 30 0

~ 20 w _J 10 w u ~ 0 _J

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at center-of-gravity

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: 1985 Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47.7 mi/h Test Angle: 1 9.0 degrees

······-·····-·····-·-·-·······L·········-··-·-··-··--·-·J·····-··-·····-·-··-·-·-··-··...1·-····-··-·-··-·-·-·-····-··..i.····-··-···············-··-···i·-·-·-··-·······-·-·-··-·--~---··-··-·-··-·····-··-·-···-·i---······-··-··-·-··-··-····-·

:~~~:::::~:~:::~~~~~~i~~:~~~~:~:::~::~t::~:~:··::~:::~~~~J~:~:~:~~:::~~:~~~~~i~:~~~:~~~~::~:::=:l~:~~~:=:~~:~~::~j:~~=~~:~~~~::::~~:l:~:::~~::::::::~~=~::· ~ -10 ~~~=:::=::t=:::=~~~~J ___ ::_ -__ _-:=i::=~~=~:~~J~~~~~=~:~~~~t~:=:=:::t::==:=t=:==:::: w

~ -20

-30 -----·--····-·--·--·J ______________ J __________________ J ____________________ J __________________ L ___________ J _____________ l._ ______________ _

-40

-50

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

TIME AFTER IMPACT {SECONDS)

1- Class 1 eo Filter - 50-msec Average J

Figure 27. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at center-of-gravity).

Page 50: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

.i:::a .i:::a

80

70

60

50 -_0

-9 40 z 0 30

~ 20 w ...J

10 w u ~ 0 ...J

(3 -10

b: w >

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60 0

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

;

0.2

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at center-of-gravity

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: 1985 Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47.7 mi/h Test Angle: 19.0 degrees

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1- Class 1 ea Fitter - so-msec Average J

Figure 28. Vehicle vertical .. accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at center-of-gravity).

0.8

Page 51: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

...(:::. (J1

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at front of vehicle

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: 1985 Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47.7 mi/h Test Angle: 19.0 degrees

.....

~-··

~:+··--····-·-······-····t-····················-·····-··t·-··················-······-l·····-·················-·-···1·····-···············-···-··t·········-··-·-·······-··r····-···-················t·-·······-·-··············-

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0. 7 0.8 1 lb = .454 kg 1 TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1 mi= 1.61 km j--· Class 1eo ntter - scHrisec Aver&QeJ

Figure 29. Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at front. of vehicle).

Page 52: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

~ O"I

80

70

60

50 Ji' .9 40 z 0 30

~ 20 w _J

10 w u ~ 0 _J

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at front of vehicle

····················-············<···································~·················· .. ·············i-······ .. ················ .. ······ .. t·· ............ .

~:~:~=~:~:~:~:~::~~~:~=:~~:~:::::~::j:::::::~~~:::::~:::.:~::~1~:~~~:~~:~::~:::~~1:~:~:~::::~ ................................. ~ .................................. + ................................. + .................................. i .............. .

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: 1985 ·Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47.7 mi/h Test Angle: 19.0 degrees

=:===:::::::~t-::::::~:::::::!:::::::::::::::t::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::E:::::::::-:=r~:::::::::::::E::::=::_::~: I l I l I I I

................................ + .. ••••• .. •••·••• ....... .. ................................... -t .. ·································t··································

~ -10 e=wai ' ~ ·-···-······-r····-···-·----·-·r··-·--·----·--·r·-·-·-······-····-·-+······--·-··-··---+-·-·-···-·-----+-·----·-·-·--·· w

~ -20

-30

-40

................................... ~ ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .

--··--··--···--·-J··--··--·-··-···J--·---·---·-·-··-·L-·-·-·--····--·---1-·-······-·····-··-....J--·-·-·-·-·--·-J--·-·--·--·--····-L·-----·-·-·

~~:=:~:~:~~~:~:::~:1~:::::~~~~:~~:~~:~:~L~:~~:~~:~~:~::~l~:~:~~~~~:~~:=:l~:~:~:~~:~:~:~~~::~:1~~~:~~:~:~~~:~:~:1:~~:~~~:~:~~~1:~~~~~::~:~~~ -50 _00

I ! i ! i l i 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0. 7 0.8

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1- c1ass 1 ea niter .;.;;... soins8CAV8r9J

Figure 30. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at front of vehicle).

Page 53: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

.,i:::. .......i

80

70

60

~ 50 .E? z 40 0

~ 30 w _J 20 w (.)

~ 10 _J 0 <( z

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at rear of vehicle

i ~ _ _ :_ ________ :__ I

Test Article: Oregon Transition Test Vehicle: 1985 Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47. 7 mi/h Test Angle: 19.0,degrees

0 -10 ::> I-~ z g

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60 ; ' 0 0.1

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1-- c1ass 1 eo ntter __,. 50insec .Average-I

Figure 31. Vehicle longitudinal accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at rear of vehicle).

0.7 0.8

Page 54: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

+::a 00

CRASH TEST 7069-28 Accelerometer at rear of vehicle

~:l-.... -....... ·-·········--~-....... -..................... .i ................ _ .............. ! ..... -.......................... .1. ....... -..... I Test Article: Oregon Transition

60-t····················-············i ................................. J ................................. J .................................. t .............. . ! i i i

Test Vehicle: 1985 Chevrolet Custom Pickup Test Inertia Weight: 5,400 lb

~ : ~::::~:~:~:~:~~~:~:l~~~~~~:~:::~:::~::::t~:~:~::::~:~~~:~::::l~~~:~::::::~~~::~:~:l~::~::~:: Gross Static Weight: 5,565 lb Test Speed: 47.7 mi/h Test Angle: 19.0 degrees

-30

-40

-50

-60 -0 0.1

1 lb = .454 kg 1 mi= 1.61 km

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 TIME AFTER IMPACT (SECONDS)

1-- Class 111:1 ntter - 50-flisec .Awrage]

Figure 32. Vehicle lateral accelerometer trace for test 7069-28 (accelerometer located at rear of vehicle).

0.7

~···

0.8

Page 55: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements

REFERENCES

1. Guide Specifications For Bridge Railings, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, DC, 1989.

49

Page 56: Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs Volume ... · This transition was tested to performance level one requirements