textual analysis evaluation
DESCRIPTION
twy btrh wtrh trh rhTRANSCRIPT
Damiano Shehu
Analysis in relation to other texts
Introduction to all texts
My text
My documentary is about the rise in the tuition fees. I looked into the options that you
could do instead of going to university and got many opinions on my topic. I got interviews
from people of the government and also a senior teacher as they could give me their views
on the rise. I also had young people in my documentary so it could appeal to my audience.
My documentary is mainstream as the topic I chose is current and is an on-going issue.
Below is the link to my documentary: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgKON7Zgzf4
Old text
This old text is a very old promotional video for a university. This video has really good
establishing shots and it has a clear voice over. All of this makes for a good promotional
video which will want to make the person watching it, want to go to this university. It talks
about the history of the university and the person doing the voice over gives good facts
about the university as well. It also tells you how much it cost to build certain buildings of
the university. Below is the link to see the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXYv7OAXUsc
New text
The documentary that I had in mind for this was removed off YouTube so I had to find
another one. I could not find one similar so instead I got this documentary. This
documentary is about statistics. In this documentary, it is very interesting as it uses great
graphics to show different statistics. It also has many interviews with different people and a
little bit of humour. I know that this documentary isn’t similar to mine, but it does have
many aspects that i used in my documentary. To view the documentary, click the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moGvo59ARNI
Content
My text
My documentary is different to the other two texts
that I analysed. This was because I could not find
anything that was similar to my documentary. My
documentary is on the rise in tuition fees and the
negative aspects that came with the £9000 tuition
fee. The content that I included in my documentary
Damiano Shehu
was how it has affected students and what they could do instead. I also got students who
are going or are still in university for their opinions. To make sure that I got the best content
I got interviews with people from the government. This mean that I could get an in depth
idea of what was going on.
Old text
This is a promotional video for a documentary
but it works well with my documentary as it talks
about the university and has many shots that
work really well that show the university and
students working. This is something that I wanted
in my documentary. In this video, the voice over
artist gives many facts about the university such
as the costs of building certain buildings. This
again is another aspect that I wanted to include. I wanted to give good facts to my audience.
New Text
In this documentary, it shows the fun side of
statistics. This documentary is different from my text
and the old text as it is about statistics. This
documentary constantly gives out facts throughout
the documentary and explains them very well. It also
has many good interviews with very smart people.
This documentary tries to show you that statistics
are fun and tries to make them appealing. It also has little bits of laughter to keep the
audience interested.
Mode of address
My text
The mode of address that I aimed to use in my documentary was formal with some informal
bits when talking to the students. When I was interviewing the people of government, I had
to talk to them in formal and reproduce that when editing my documentary. This is because
I wanted to make this bit serious and so the audience knew exactly what I was talking about.
When talking to the students I did try and make it informal so that it would appeal to my
audience.
The locations that I used in my documentary were normal for a documentary. When
interviewing people, I interviewed them in an office which shows the seriousness and
Damiano Shehu
professionalism. On the other hand, when I got my vox pops of the students, they were
normally by a busy street. This also shows the informal aspect.
Old text
The mode of address for the old text is very formal. There is no presenter just a man who
does the voice over. What this means is that you can’t there is no body langue that you can
talk about. Also it only shows the university throughout, so the location is formal as well.
New text
The mode of this documentary is very formal as well. This documentary would be niche as
not all people would want to watch this documentary as some might think that it is boring.
However, this documentary is similar to mine as it is formal but also tries to use some
informal bits to make it appeal to everyone.
The locations that are used in this documentary are very formal. The presenter is a
professor and talks to many people. He is also talking in front of a university or a political
building. This all shows that this documentary is serious and formal.
My vox pops that I done in the
street.
An interview
which I recorded
in an office
I’m dressed in a very
informal way. This would
appeal to my audience.
I had news reports which
made it more serious and
formal.
Damiano Shehu
Also, in this documentary people are dressed in smart clothes such as suites or shits. This
also connotes that this documentary is formal. It does try to make it a bit informal with one
person having their shirt undone and sleeves rolled up.
Conventions
My text
During and throughout my documentary, I think that I used most of the convections. I used
vox pops, graphics, music, interviews, sign in and off, archive footage and showing the
presenter entering the buildings of who I was going to interview. However, I though that I
could have showed the presenter when the interviews were going on.
These are the two locations were you can see
that the documentary is formal.
As you can see, the presenter is wearing a suit which shows that this
documentary is formal. The other person they interview is in a shirt
but in an informal kind of way.
Archive footage of the riots that
occurred when the tuition fees were
raised.
This shows that graphics I used, it
said who I was interviewing.
Damiano Shehu
Old text
This old text doesn’t use a lot of conventions. The only conventions that were similar to
mine were that it had a voice over, music and one graphic. The lack of conventions could be
because of the resources they had in them days.
What this means was that there was no interviews, vox pops, sign in and off and also
cutaways.
I think that if they used more of the conventions then this could have been much better and
looked better as well. As the technology wasn’t invented in those days, they couldn’t make
good footage. I think that they done well with what they had as the shots used were quite
good.
New text
This documentary had all the conventions that I used. I think that all the modern day
documentaries would have this as they have good technology and they know how to make a
good documentary.
This shows that I used cutaways in
my documentary. I used them in all
of my interviews.
This shows that I
used interviews.
Here is an example of vox pops.
Graphic at the start of the footage
This is the type of advanced graphics
they can do in modern day
documentaries.
Damiano Shehu
Similar to mine, it used good interviews and had good archive footage to express what the
interviewee is talking about. They only had a few archive footage as the rest was all their
own. This meant that they could use a variety of different shots which would make the
documentary interesting. I tried to have a variety of shots to make mine interesting, but as
mine was only 5 minutes long and I dint have the equipment that they did.
Also this documentary had good background music were it was needed which worked well.
The type of music used was classical which went well with the documentary as it is formal.
This is similar to my documentary as I had music throughout mine which appealed to my
audience.
Style and Form
My text
The style that I tried to aim for in my documentary was an interesting one with a political
aspect to it. I wanted it to be smoothly edited and flow so that people wouldn’t get bored
and lose focus. This would mean that it would be a serious documentary with interesting
facts. I tried to do with this with my interviews but I think I could have had more facts.
I think that I could have changed the music. Instead of it running throughout my
documentary I think that I could have had different types of music in my documentary to
connote different aspects of my documentary. The music I used was appealing to my
audience but was a bit tedious.
I used good camera shots in my documentary to make it feel like a serious one. I had talking
space for all my interviews and vox pops. One thing that I didn’t have was me asking the
question. I think that if I did have that then my documentary would have looked more
professional and would have worked much better.
An interview which I did in a very
political place
Damiano Shehu
Old text
The old text didn’t have a presenter. As this was a promotional video, it was promoting the
university, so that was the style of this text. The voice over was similar to mine as I used a
voice over to explain the advantages of going to university.
New text
This documentary is very professional as they had a lot of money to make it. This
documentary is very modern and everything is done perfectly. The editing is spot on and has
a very good use of conventions. It is similar to mine as it has interviews and is formal in the
style. Like mine it had talking space and very nice cutaways.
The style was more on the graphics side and it showed that very well. The graphics it used
was very modern and advanced. Another similarity to my documentary was that it used
good introductions to who they were going to interview next.
Talking space
The graphics they used are very well
made and advanced.
Damiano Shehu
Technology
My text
I think that I made a good documentary with the technology that I had to use. I managed to
show what I wanted to and edited it in the way I wanted to as well. Using iMovie was easy
and productive as I could do many things to my documentary, such as add graphics,
transitions and edit well. This showed my creative side as I managed to edit my
documentary well and make it flow.
I also made my graphics on iMovie as I did not have enough time to go over to live type and
create them on there. This meant that my graphics are plain and would have been better if I
went on live type. I did make two graphics on live type and these were the ones that looked
well and make my documentary more appealing.
I think that if I used a HD camera like some of the students in my class, then I think my
documentary would have looked more professional and much clearer.
Old text
You can tell when this was made as only uses two colours. As technology was very bad then
and they didn’t have the technology that we have today, the text is very old and not well
made. The quality is very bad and you can see black bits on the screen.
It may look blurry, but that is a
transition. I used the overlap
transition to make is flow.
Graphic that I made on live type
Damiano Shehu
The camera shots are not still and there is no type of editing. They only use jump shots. This
just shows you what the technology was like in the old days.
New text
This new text is very professional and you can tell how good the technology is. You can also
see a massive difference from my documentary and the old text. They have used HD quality
cameras to make the picture look better. They also have probably used boom microphones
to pick up the sound from the interview. Also the lighting is very well made, so I think they
have also got their own lights to set up the shot.
Also, they must have a professional editing system as they graphics and editing is at the
highest standard.
You can see that it is not clear. You
can also see the wing of a plane that
they were in to record this shot.
These two shots look very
professional and well done.