thaïenne van dijk, deltares
DESCRIPTION
Seabed morphodynamics of the Dutch continental shelf. As a physical geographer she is employed by Deltares in Utrecht and has led extensive studies in this field, in co-operation with the Dutch Hydrographic Office and Rijkswaterstaat. Based on the variability of bedforms, the survey programmes of both organisations are being optimized.TRANSCRIPT
Thaiënne A.G.P. van Dijk (Deltares & University Twente) Kees van der Tak, Erwin van Iperen (MARIN) 15 February 2012
Morphodynamics of the North Sea bed using echo-sounding time series
- Applied to validating a re-survey policy involving shipping grounding dangers based on AIS data
2
Presentation
• Introduction • Sea bed morphology (marine bedforms) • Echo sounding data
• Methods and Results: quantification sea bed dynamics • Vertical dynamics NCS • Morphodynamics of individual marine bedforms
• Methods and results: modelling grounding dangers from AIS data (MARIN) • Regular grounding danger • Object grounding danger
• Validation and optimisation of a re-survey policy
• Conclusions
Introduction
Part 2 Application
Part 1 Morphodyn
3
Rationale
• Dynamic bedforms • Local studies of seabed dynamics in
the North Sea (e.g. offshore wind farm sites)
• Quantification of vertical dynamics NCS wide and detailed analyses of bedforms provide knowledge on the spatial variation of sea bed dynamics
Bathymetry [m -GLLWS]
+ 2.72 m
- 71.07 m
Introduction
Bathymetry NCS (TNO, 2004)
4
Marine bedforms
sand banks
sand waves
Introduction
5
Marine bedforms
(e.g. Ashley, 1990; Knaapen et al., 2001)
Bedform Wavelength
(m) Height (m)
Orientation (degrees to tidal current)
Morphodynamic time scale (order of years)
Offshore sand banks (tidal ridges)
1 000 – 10 000 5 - 50 0 - 30 centuries
Long bed waves 1 000 – 2 000 1 - 10 60 centuries Sand waves 100 – 1 000 1 – 10 90 years-decades megaripples 7 – 40 < 1 90 hours
Introduction
6
Echo sounding data
• All bathymetric data in NLHO’s Bathymetric Archive System (BAS) • NLHO & RWS • SBES & MBES • Late 1980s – June 2010
• Non-digital data NLHO (fair sheets)
NLHO BAS
7
Quantification dynamics NCS: methods Part 1:
Morphodyn
• Echo sounding dataset: Digital Elevation Model (DEM) • Time series of DEMs: Vertical dynamics NCS
dz/dt (vertical dynamic trend) label (e.g. n, stdv)
• Vertical dynamics [m/year] based on the analysis of observations of NCS
• 25 x 25 m cells
x
z
y
NLHO survey overview 2002
8
Vertical dynamics NCS Part 1:
Morphodyn
• First version: survey areas dominant
9
Correction vertical trend
• removal of differences between surveys
Part 1: Morphodyn
10
Vertical dynamics NCS
Coast is dynamic: • tidal inlets and
tidal channels • Estuaries NCS less dynamic
Relatively dynamic on NCS: • north of Texel • west of Texel • southern part with bedforms • anthropogenic
Part 1: Morphodyn
11
Vertical dynamics NCS (simplified)
Non-dynamic areas NCS: • > 30 m deep • north of Wadden islands • zone offshore North-Holland • locally offshore South-Holland
and Zealand
Dynamic areas NCS: • Long bed wave field (n. Texel) • Sand wave field (w. Texel) • Southern NCS with bedforms
Part 1: Morphodyn
Vertical dynamics of German Bight
• Bed elevation range (m)
• data 1982 - 2004
(Winter, 2011)
Part 1: Morphodyn
13
Morphodynamics individual bedforms Part 1:
Morphodyn
2
1. Sand waves west of Texel
& ‘TWIN’ area 2. Long bed waves north of
Texel 3. Shoreface-connected ridges
north of Ameland
3
1
1
14
Morphodynamics individual bedforms: method
• Semi-automated method for the analysis of the morphology and morphodynamics of rhythmic bedforms (Van Dijk et al., 2008)
Morphodynamics individual bedforms
1. Sand waves west of Texel
Part 1: Morphodyn
Sand wave migration rate: • west of Texel: 19 m/yr • NCS: 0 – 5 m/yr
L [m] H [m] min av max min av max 100 345 800 0.3 1.4 3.2
1. Sand waves west of Texel
16
TWIN profile 1 (southwest to northeast)
-36
-34
-32
-30
2500 2700 2900 3100 3300 3500
distance along profile [m]
bed
elev
atio
n [m
-LA
T]
Jan-91Jun-92Apr-94May-95Mar-99Feb-01May-01Mar-03Apr-04Apr-05Oct-06
SW NE
Morphodynamics individual bedforms Part 1:
Morphodyn
1. Sand waves south-west on the NCS (‘TWIN’ area) • time series of 11
datasets
Sand wave migration rate: • ranges between -4.5 and
+0.064 m/yr • Average 1.5 m/yr to SW Sand wave growth: • <0.2 m/yr
L [m] H [m] min av max min av max 140 270 380 2.5 4.8 7.3
Morphodynamics individual bedforms
2. Long bed waves north of Texel & Vlieland: • migration 12.4 m/yr to NE (ranges from 10.5 to 18.4 m/yr)
-30
-28
-26
-24
0 3000 6000 9000 12000
distance along profile (m)
bed
elev
atio
n (m
-LAT
)199020032009
SW NE
12
34 5
Part 1: Morphodyn
L [m] H [m]
min av max min av max 744 1125 1409 2.7 3.4 4.3
Morphodynamics individual bedforms
3. Shoreface-connected ridges north of Ameland and Schier: • migration ~0 m/yr • growth ~ 0 m/yr
-5
0
5
0 5 10 15 20 distance along profile (km)
seab
ed e
leva
tion
arou
nd z
ero
(m)
1997,1998 2006
SSW NNE
Part 1: Morphodyn
L [m] H [m]
min av max min av max 4084 4614 5154 2.9 4.3 5.5
19
Application to validating survey policies
NLHO’s re-survey policy for the NCS, 2007
Rationale:
• NLHO: hydrographic measurements for reliable nautical mapping
• Accuracy requirements defined by the International Hydrographic Organisation (IHO)
• No guidelines for the monitoring frequency (re-surveying policy)
• Increasing efficiency without diminishing safety
Part 2: Application
gcap
tain
.com
20
Modelling grounding dangers from AIS data
• (predicted) water depth
• estimate the probability of unknown objects at the seabed
• Distribution unknown objects at the sea bed
0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
0 5 10 15 20
prob
ababilit
y
height of obstruction
all
0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
0 5 10 15 20
prob
abability
height of obstruction
all
new
• Known objects at the sea bed
↓
• Known new objects at the sea bed
Two types of danger of running aground: • limited water depth (regular grounding) • unknown objects at the seabed (object grounding)
Modelling grounding dangers from AIS data
• If the actual margin > desired margin → no grounding danger (= 0) • If the actual margin < 0 → ship certainly grounds • If the actual margin < desired margin and > 0 → probability of grounding
Critical situation Non-critical situation
• Calculate the danger of running aground using safety margins
AIS-database
• Automatic Identification System • observation every two minutes
• Traffic is allocated to cells
(1 x 1 km) • Per cel: number of ships with
draught in classes of 1 m • Danger when depth is smaller
than the critical depth
AIS-data of 1 week in July 2009
Part 2: Application
23
Regular grounding danger
Fig 8-1 MARIN-rapport 23407.620/4r
MARIN’s regular grounding danger on NCS for all ships per km2 per year
• approach channels to harbours • shallow shipping lane • small areas
• 4 spots DWRE • north of Terschelling
Part 2: Application
• all ships year-1 km-2 with respect to average water depth (actual margin ma < 0)
• ma = WD(t) – draught • Critical water depth =
draught + UKC + 2 [m]
§ 262,800 obs/year § 10000, i.e. 1 in 26.28 observations is a ship with a
negative margin § 1 obs ~ 1 ship
Simplifications: • Tides were neglected • Waterdepth in 1 x 1 km
cells (min-mean-max)
24
Object grounding danger
Fig 8-6 MARIN-rapport 23407.620/4r
MARIN’s object grounding danger on NCS for all ships per km2 per year
• traffic lanes • anchorage areas
Part 2: Application
Assumption: • Known objects are not a danger,
since these are marked.
Simplifications: • speed = 14 knots (deep ships) thus
overestimation in anchorage areas, but here also higher probability for objects
• for mean water depth • Number of ships year-1 km-2
for which margin is exceeded based on probability unknown objects
25
Validation of a re-survey policy
GIS-overlay method: • re-survey policy • combined grounding dangers for
ships for water depth and unknown objects
• morphodynamics (dz/dt) as predicted water depths 2011, 2015, 2020
Part 2: Application
26
Combined grounding dangers
very low
medium
0
high
low
CAT 1 – at least every 2 years
CAT 2 – 4 years CAT 3 – 6 years CAT 4 – 10 years CAT 5 – 15 years
Part 2: Application
27
Validation of categories Category 1
0102030405060
0 1 10 11 20 21 22 23 30 31 32 33
combined grounding danger
occu
rren
ce o
f tot
al
(%)
• A different distribution
of classes will lead to different occurrences of dangers
CAT 1 – at least every 2 years
CAT 2 – 4 years CAT 3 – 6 years CAT 4 – 10 years CAT 5 – 15 years
very low
medium
0
high
low
Part 2: Application
Category 5
0204060
80100
0 1 10 11 20 21 22 23 30 31 32 33
combined grounding danger
occu
rrenc
e of
tota
l (%
)
28
Refinement of a re-survey policy Part 2:
Application
Steps towards a new plan 1. Category division based on danger maps 2. Assignment of re-survey frequencies to
categories based on predictions
Step 2 --> predictions
• New plan alike existing policy in both division and distribution of categories
• Some sites show higher dangers (DWRE)
• Also areas where the re-survey frequency may be lowered
Step 1
29
Predicted water depths
• Difference maps
• Linear extrapolation dynamic trend
Part 2: Application
30
Predicted grounding dangers
• Object grounding 2011 • Regular grounding 2011
• 2015 • 2020
Part 2: Application
31
Development of grounding danger
• Differences in combined dangers in the future, based on predicted water depths
2010 to 2015 2010 to 2020 2010 to 2011
Part 2: Application
32
Conclusions
• Quantified vertical dynamics of the NCS is the first overview study of the NCS • highly dynamic coastal zone (> 0.3 m/yr) and less dynamic offshore • dynamic offshore: marine bedforms (0 to 0.3 m/yr) • non-dynamic: > 30 m water depth, north of Wadden islands, small areas (< 0.02 m/yr)
• Migration rates of individual marine bedforms: • sand waves 0 – 5 m/yr NCS; 19 m/yr west of Texel • long bed waves (1 location) 12.4 m/yr • shoreface-connected ridges north of Wadden islands are nearly stable
• Morphodynamics can be used in the application of validating and optimising re-survey policies,
• variation of the occurrences of high and low dangers within one category pleads for rearrangement of the categories and re-survey frequencies
• assign re-survey frequencies by predicting the development of dangers in the future.
• Regular grounding danger largest in approach channels and some local areas (e.g. Deep Water Route East due to sand banks)
• Object grounding danger largest in traffic lanes and in anchorage areas
33
Acknowledgements
Netherlands Hydrographic Office, Royal Netherlands Navy • Provided all echo sounding data • Financed the project
Maritime Simulation Centre Netherlands, Maritime Research Institute Netherlands • modelled grounding dangers
Rijkswaterstaat • Provided echo sounding data
• Provided AIS data to MARIN Netherlands Coastguard
RWS-project 2011
Research project on the sea bed dynamics: • Quantitative morphodynamics of approach channels and
the river Waal • Factors controlling the spatial and temporal morphodynamic
variation • Advice on re-survey plan
--- Thank you for your attention ----
Morphodynamic trend
• Elevation rate of 1 m/yr • Goodness of fit = 1
(a) node (25,0)
y = xR2 = 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 2 4 6 8 10
time (years)
z (m
)
(b) node (0,0)
y = 0.9214x - 0.6571R2 = 0.8021
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 2 4 6 8 10
(c) node (0,0) for different dt
y = 0.2724x + 0.5286R2 = 0.4908
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 2 4 6 8 10
36
Typen data
MBES
530100 530150 5302005743000
5743050
5743100
595250 595255 5952605805890
5805895
5805900
100 x 100 m 10 x 10 m
SBES
3 redenen van onzekerheid bij vergelijk: • Breedte SBES straal: eerste reflectie (ondiepste punt binnen
straal) • Getijdereductie • Ondiepste punt geselecteerd op minuurtbladen
• Digitale data uit BAS: reductie tot 1 observatie per 3 x 5 m
• Gedigitaliseerde minuutbladen lagere resolutie
In addition
Vertical dynamics NCS
1. Tidal inlet between Vlieland and Terschelling
Part 1: Morphodyn
39
Objective 1: tijdseries
• Stijgende trend in verticale dynamiek
• Periode van opneming geen groot effect op nauwkeurigheid
• Meeste tijdseries korter:
In addition
40
Overzichten bij analyses morfodynamiek (Obj.3)
• Goodness of fit, R2 • Aantal surveys in tijdserie
In addition