The abnormal variation The abnormal variation of the of the ββ-decay intensity -decay intensity during the Solar eclipse during the Solar eclipse

on the 29on the 29thth of March 2006 of March 2006

Alexandre V. Boukalov Alexandre V. Boukalov

Department of Physics, International Institute of Socionics,Department of Physics, International Institute of Socionics,ISI, Melnikova str., 12, Kiev-050, 04050, UkraineISI, Melnikova str., 12, Kiev-050, 04050, Ukraine

e-mail: boukalov @gmail.come-mail: boukalov @gmail.com

The cosmic bodies action on the in the terrestrial physical processes is insufficiently studied till now. Some authors informed about the mentioned bodies influence on the resistors, situated in the reflection telescope focus and about the solar radiation action on the biological sensor before 8 minutes of the observed sunrise [1-5]. Besides there was the report about bursts of the beta-radiation sources, situated in the reflection telescope focus [6]. But the author did not propose a connection of these bursts with any astrophysical process.

This work is devoted to the investigation of the connection between the beta-decay intensity and the certain astrophysical process in the system Sun-Moon-Earth. For this purpose it was constructed the simple installation, consisted of the standard portable device RKS-20.03 “Pripiat”, designed for the radioactivity level registration, and the low intensity beta-radiation source tritium (3

1H), situated in the focus of the 50-centimeters parabolic TV- antenna, covered by the aluminum foil (fig. 1).

The beta-radiation source was rigidly connected to the radiometer in order to exclude any occasional relative replacements and the measurement distortions. The installation was situated in the house, built with the use of concrete ceilings.

The investigations were carried out in Kiev (Ukraine), on the 958 Green-wich time (1258 Kiev time) and this event did not act on the beta-radiation intensity. The average intensity was I = 210 particles/min·cm2.

Fig. 1. The scheme of the experiment.

1 - Beta-radiation source.2 - Radiometer.3 - Parabolic antenna.4 - Concrete ceilings.

At the 1058 Greenwich time (1358 Kiev time) – t1 - the intensity increased by 10% till 232 particles/min·cm2 during 20 sec and then it relaxed during 12 sec.

At the moment t2 (moment of the eclipse maximum) the burst is only 4% compared with background level. The further observation were carried out till 1800 Greenwich time (2100 Kiev time), but there were no essential changes of the beta-radiation intensity. Despite the intensity variability of the used tritium beta-radiation source the similar intensity increase till 232 particles/min·cm2 was not observed under the further many hours observations and the others experiments.

Fig. 2. The time dependence of the beta-radiation intensity during the partial solar eclipse. t1 is the moment before 8,3 minutes of the eclipse maximum, which occurred at t2 moment. The beta-radiation bursts were observed at these moments.

t1 t2

One should note that between t1 and t2, within the interval 1100-1104 there is a steady minimum of the beta-radiation intensity. The fluctuations above 205 particles/min·cm2 are suppressed directly opposite to the fluctuation picture before t1 and after t2. The abnormal intensity increase has place before 8,3 minutes of the visually observed partial solar eclipse, which was 69% at the Kiev latitude. It is known that 8,3 minutes is the time of the passage of the electromagnetic radiation, including light, from Sun to Earth. At the same time t is the interval between the moments t1 and t2. Thus at the moment t1 the Sun was situated in the astronomical position, related to it visual observation at the moment t2, exactly equal to 1106'54".

The observed experimental observations can be explained taking into account the following notion: the Sun is a source of unknown Y-radiation, generated together with the electromagnetic radiation. It is possible that namely the mentioned radiation stimulates the radioactive decay, which was erroneously treated as spontaneous till now.

One can suppose that the penetrating solar Y-radiation diffracts on the Moon and concentrates in the narrow zone near the Earth surface. The concentrated Y-radiation zone is connected with the observed solar eclipse maximum (fig. 3).

Fig. 3. The scheme of the Y-radiation diffraction by the Moon.

It is probable that the mentioned zone moves on the Earth surface due to the solar eclipse zone and coincides with it totally or partly.

However the Y-radiation has not only the lated component, but also the forestalling one, which moves back in time with the light speed and acts on the radioactive source at the moment t1 according to the Earth observer watch. We note that the theory of radiation with forestalling and lating waves was developed by R. Feynman and J. Wheeler [7, 8]. This theory was used for development of the quantum mechanics transaction interpretation, which explains the probabilistic character of the quantum mechanics measurements [9].

Moon

Earth

Sun

Taking into account that the beta-decay is a quantum phenomena, we are able to make a conclusion that under this experiment we have observed the phenomenon of the action of the forestalling Y-radiation quantum wave on the beta-decay intensity. This action was move intensive compared to the lating wave one. (We note that at the moment t2 the observed solar radiation was emitted namely at the moment t1, when we had observed the beta-decay intensity maximum.)

If we take into account the transaction description of the wave processes [9], the observed interactions can be connected with the 4-dimentsions standing wave, which is the superposition of the forestalling and lating radiations. The observed minimum of the beta-radiation intensity and its fluctuations within 1000-1104 Greenwich time are also connected with the same standing wave.

The possible mechanism of the beta-decay stimulation can be realized by the following way. The beta-decay is caused by the weak interaction. The beta-decay equation for tritium is just the following (fig. 4):

Fig. 4. The scheme of the process, described by equation (1).

It is supposed that the energy of the vacuum dark energy quanta, which give the main contribution into the Universe energy density (0,7Ωс), is very near by its order of magnitude to the difference of the massed of the solar oscillating neutrino: .

(1)

Thus some authors [10, 11] proposed a conclusion that the neutrino masses oscillations and the weak interaction aspects, connected with them, are determined by the vacuum “dark energy” features. If it is so, this “dark energy”, acting on the neutrino processes, has also to act on the beta-decay processes. It this case the interactions (including the gravitational ones) in the system Sun-Moon-Earth cause the 4-dimensions vacuum standing wave of “dark energy”, acting on the beta-decay and caused the observed and described effects.

ConclusionsConclusions 1. It is registrated the action of the unknown solar Y-radiation, or the

interaction in the system Sun-physical vacuum (“dark energy”)-Moon-Earth, on the beta-decay intensity.

2. Y-radiation probably is reflected by the aluminum foil, what provided to increase almost y 600 times the intensity of the action on tritium beta-decay source using the parabolic focusing antenna.

3. Y-radiation is not screened by the concrete ceiling and thus it is not directly connected with photon radiation.

4. Y-radiation has a usual component, spreading with the light speed, and forestalling component, spreading “back in time” according the local Earth observer watch with the light speed and more active acting on the beta-decay intensity. It is possible that these components have different essence.

5. The process, coming “back in time”, or information “signal from future”, as mathematician Norbert Wiener noted [12], will have absolutely accidental feature for the Earth observer. Taking into account that the beta-decay is an accidental process, we can make a conclusion that it is the natural indicator of the radiation forestalling wave.

The obtained results can be explained by the existence of the unknown kind of the solar Y-radiation, which rises under the nuclear processes in Sun and acts on the others nuclear processes in space. Under this action the four-dimensions standing Y-field wave is the superposition of the forestalling and delayed components, analogically the R. Feynman-J. Wheeler electrodynamics and the J. Kramer transacting description of quantum mechanics. The forestalling component detected action for the local observer is equivalent to the “momentary action on distance” and connected with the abnormal increase of the β-decay intensity, occurred on the 8.3 minutes before the appearance of the observed delayed solar radiation.

The detailed investigations of the similar effects are needed with the use of the more perfect apparatuses and the different source of alpha-, beta- and gamma-radiation.

References:

1. Tokata M. The protein sedimentation investigation. — Archiv fur Meteorologie, Geophysics und Bioklimatologie. Serie B. 1951, 2-5.

2. Klochek N. V. The preliminary results of the cosmophysical nonelectromagnetic radiation influence on the physical and biological systems. — Biophysics. 1995, N 4, 889-896 (in Russian).

3. Lavrentiev M. M. On the truth Sun position registration. // Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1990. — N 2. — 368-370 (in Russian).

4. Kozirev N. A. Selected works. Leningrad, 1991, 446p. (in Russian). http://www.timashev.ru/Kozyrev.

5. Adamenko A. A., Gorchev V. F., Levchhok Yu. N. The development of improved structure of fundamental interactions. // Physics of consciousness and life. — 2003. — N 3. — 20-30.

6. Parhomov A. G. Rythms and fluctuations, three types of phenomena. Cosmos-Earth information interactions. // Physics of consciousness and life. — 2005. — N 4. — 20-29 (in Russian).

7. Wheeler J. A., Feynman R. P. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 156 (1945).8. Wheeler J. A., Feynman R. P. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 424 (1949).9. Kramer J., Rev. Mod. Phys., 58, 647–688 (1986).10. Strumia A. and Vissani F. Nucl. Phys. B 426, 294 (2005); hep-ph/0503246.11. Kaplan D. B., Nelson A. E. and Weiner N. hep-ph/040199.12. Wiener N. Cybernetics. – New-York – London, 1961.