the asq global state of quality 2 researchww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2016/07/14/13554813/4.12.16 gsoq...

2
The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Research Figure 1. Percentage of respondents by region. The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Research builds on the Global State of Quality iniaves of 2013, again providing a comprehensive, global, and quantave view of the state of quality and connuous improvement worldwide. The results and analysis provides organizaons the bench- mark data needed to further develop connuous improve- ment pracces and enhance quality programs. New to the 2016 research is the development of a World- Class profile that organizaons can benchmark against to im- prove their connuous improvement acvies. ASQ and its research partner, APQC, analyzed responses from nearly 1,700 companies worldwide (Fig. 1), idenfying world-class organizaons based on common and strong end-to-end quali- ty pracces. The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Research: Discoveries 2016 and three Spotlight Reports can be accessed for down- load at globalstateofquality.org. Using Quality as a Compeve Differenator and Strategic Asset According to the research, and compared to the 2013 data, fewer organizaons in 2016 view quality as simply a compliance acv- ity or a check-the-box opportunity. Only 14 per- cent of respondents in 2016 say their companies view quality mainly as a compliance acvity, down from 22 percent in 2013. More organizaons now see quality as an oppor- tunity to gain a compe- ve edge, and as a strategic asset. In fact, the research shows 36 percent of all respondents say their company views quality as such, up from 22 percent from 2013 (Fig. 2). But given that organizaons view quality as a strategic asset and compeve differenator, it may come as no surprise that quality departments are now more visible within organi- zaons, which in turn has resulted in increased measures and reporng. For example, according to the research, senior leaders and department leaders are receiving reports more frequently than in 2013. Accelerang Qustomer® Coined by ASQ in 2013, the Qustomer® is derived from the close alignment in some organizaons between the customer and quality. According to the 2016 research, customers and quality remain closely aligned, with 86 percent saying “customers are the key driver of our quality programs,” and 77 percent saying “customer needs dictate our quality objec- ves” (Fig. 3). But, the concept that the customer is the only one who can define quality is shiſting. In 2013, 56 percent replied that “the belief is that the customer is the only person qualified to de- fine what quality means.” In 2016, the percentage fell to 46 percent. Figure 2. Quality is ….

Upload: others

Post on 21-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Researchww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2016/07/14/13554813/4.12.16 GSoQ 2...2016/07/14  · ment practices and enhance quality programs. New to the 2016 research

The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Research

Figure 1. Percentage of respondents by region.

The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Research builds on the Global State of Quality initiatives of 2013, again providing a comprehensive, global, and quantitative view of the state of quality and continuous improvement worldwide.

The results and analysis provides organizations the bench-mark data needed to further develop continuous improve-ment practices and enhance quality programs.

New to the 2016 research is the development of a World-Class profile that organizations can benchmark against to im-prove their continuous improvement activities. ASQ and its research partner, APQC, analyzed responses from nearly 1,700 companies worldwide (Fig. 1), identifying world-class organizations based on common and strong end-to-end quali-ty practices.

The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Research: Discoveries

2016 and three Spotlight Reports can be accessed for down-

load at globalstateofquality.org.

Using Quality as a

Competitive

Differentiator and

Strategic Asset

According to the research,

and compared to the 2013

data, fewer organizations

in 2016 view quality as

simply a compliance activ-

ity or a check-the-box

opportunity. Only 14 per-

cent of respondents in

2016 say their companies

view quality mainly as a

compliance activity, down

from 22 percent in 2013.

More organizations now

see quality as an oppor-

tunity to gain a competi-

tive edge, and as a strategic asset. In fact, the research shows

36 percent of all respondents say their company views quality

as such, up from 22 percent from 2013 (Fig. 2).

But given that organizations view quality as a strategic asset

and competitive differentiator, it may come as no surprise

that quality departments are now more visible within organi-

zations, which in turn has resulted in increased measures and

reporting. For example, according to the research, senior

leaders and department leaders are receiving reports more

frequently than in 2013.

Accelerating Qustomer®

Coined by ASQ in 2013, the Qustomer® is derived from the

close alignment in some organizations between the customer

and quality. According to the 2016 research, customers and

quality remain closely aligned, with 86 percent saying

“customers are the key driver of our quality programs,” and

77 percent saying “customer needs dictate our quality objec-

tives” (Fig. 3).

But, the concept that the customer is the only one who can

define quality is shifting. In 2013, 56 percent replied that “the

belief is that the customer is the only person qualified to de-

fine what quality means.” In 2016, the percentage fell to 46

percent.

Figure 2. Quality is ….

Page 2: The ASQ Global State of Quality 2 Researchww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2016/07/14/13554813/4.12.16 GSoQ 2...2016/07/14  · ment practices and enhance quality programs. New to the 2016 research

This may be driven by the realization that quality of back-

office activities — which may not be directly visible to cus-

tomers — can significantly impact business performance and

compliance. Regardless, a balance between customer and

quality needs to be reached.

Business Performance Impact

Along with an increased visibility comes increased resources

to ensure quality throughout an organization. Among non-

world-class respondents, 54 percent said their organization’s

investment in quality has increased in the past three years.

Only 10 percent said their investment decreased (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Investment in quality over last three years.

All world-class organizations increased their investment in

quality, according to the research.

While investment in quality for most organizations increased

in the past three years, only 39 percent of respondents said

they measure the financial impact of quality; 60 percent of

organizations don’t know or don’t measure the financial im-

pact of quality. This may be attributed to lacking a method for

capturing quality’s financial impact. Of those organizations

that do measure financial impact, 13 percent said quality has

resulted in an increase of more than $1 million USD annually.

Figure 3. The role of the Qustomer®.

Download the Global State of Quality 2 Research Reports Today at

globalstateofquality.org