the atlas pixel system architecture

13
The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture ATLAS Pixel Module: 1 Sensor 16 Frontend chips 1 Module Control Chip (MCC) Module Control Room Stave / Disk

Upload: kinsey

Post on 06-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture. ATLAS Pixel Module: 1 Sensor 16 Frontend chips 1 Module Control Chip (MCC). Module. Stave / Disk. Control Room. How does it look like?. Connections between FE-Chips, MCC, passive components and cable through a thin kapton PCB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

• ATLAS Pixel Module:– 1 Sensor

– 16 Frontend chips

– 1 Module Control Chip (MCC)

Module Control RoomStave / Disk

Page 2: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

How does it look like?

• Connections between FE-Chips, MCC, passive components and cable through a thin kapton PCB

• Active area = 16.4 60.8 mm2

• 16 Chips with ~ 50000 pixels of 50 400 m2 total

• Larger pixels between chips

Page 3: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

The ATLAS-Pixelsensors

• n-in-n silicon

• 250 m thick

• Normal pixels:– 50 × 400 m2

• In interchip-regions:– Long pixels (600m)

– “Ganged” pixels

Page 4: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

The ATLAS Pixelchips

• Chip Size: 7.4 mm × 11 mm

• 18 × 160 = 2880 Pixels

• Pixel Size: 50 m × 400 m

• Deep submicron, radiation hard

(tested up to 60 Mrad)

• 40 MHz operating frequency

• Zero suppression in every pixel

• Data is buffered until trigger arrives

• Serial control and readout, LVDS IO

• Analogue part: – ~ 40 W power dissipation / pixel– ~ 200 e noise– Amplitude measured via pulse width

(time over threshold)

Page 5: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

The ATLAS Pixelcell

• One pixel cell: in case of a charge above threshold address and Time over Threshold are read out Zero suppression in pixel

Constant current feedback- Leakage tolerance > 100 nA- Linear decay

Analogue information- Measure hit width

Individual Adjustment of- Threshold- Feedback- Adjust ranges

Page 6: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

ATLAS Pixelchip-history / production

• FE-I1:– Up to now 90 modules produced (90 % good modules)– Problems:

• Problems with threshold dispersion / tuning• Inefficiencies (timewalk) in interchip-regions (longer / ganged pixels)• SEU-hardness not satisfactory (numbers?)

• FE-I2:– Produced, modules built (numbers?), tested, irradiated– Problems of FE-I1 solved– Problems:

• Race condition in digital part (global register) FE-I2.1, FE-I3

• FE-I3:– Production version, production expected to start end of this year

• Module production:– Done by IZM (PbSn) and AMS (In)– ATLAS cut: Less than 150 bad pixels (0.3%) per module, less than 50 per

chip

Page 7: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

The Module Control Chip (MCC)

• Interface between module and readout system – More or less equivalent to the pilot in our system

• Receives commands from the readout system– Slow commands (config etc.)

– Fast commands (during data taking, mainly for synchronisation issues)

– Trigger command

• Distributes commands and triggers to chips – Length of trigger can be configured from 25 – 400 ns

– Minimum distance between two triggers 125 ns

• Combines 16 individual events from the FE-chips

Page 8: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

ATLAS Pixel Module - Block Diagram

1

15

Page 9: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

ATLAS Pixel Module - Connections

• Command/Data Interface: 3/4 LVDS lines– DCI: Data & Command In

– DTO/DTO2: Data Out, Data Out2 optional to increase bandwidth

– CK: 40 MHz clock

• Additional connections:– 1 High voltage

– 2 Low voltages with sense-lines(?)• VDDD 2.0V for chips and MCC (0.8 – 1.5 A)• VDDA 1.7V (1.2 A)

– CK Return for synchronisation

• Backplane: Isolated

Page 10: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

ATLAS Pixel Module - Dimensions

• Thicknesses:

Active area: 16.4 mm

Module width:22.4 mm

Module length length of active area= 60.8 mm

MCC: 180 mSensor: 250 mFE-Chips: 180 m

(+ Kapton + passive components)

Page 11: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

Possible Arrangements

• 1-Plane setup

• Dead areas:– Beam hole 2.2 × 0.6 cm

– 2 bands of > 6 mm

• Power per plane: ~16 W

61.2 mm

• 2-Plane setup

• Dead areas:– 1 band of 12 mm

• Power per plane: ~ 8 W~ 78 mm- overlap

Page 12: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

Design issues

• “Pigtail”– Flex cable connected to the kapton layer– Should (maybe) be designed by us, i.e. module should be delivered without– Form? (2D: routing of the lines, 3D: protection of the wire bonds)– Impedance issues, critical?– Connection: Wire bonds, soldering?

• Ceramic / PCB– One piece or hybrid / ceramic?– Backplanes can / should be isolated

Behind/close to module no circuitry is needed, only heat conductivity

– Lines impedance matched

• Readout lines– Three LVDS lines (2 two module, 1 from module)– Maybe one return clock for synchronisation– Maximum length?

• Power supply– Two power lines (per module ?)– Sense lines? (Note: digital current varies especially when module is noisy)

• Readout– Protocol – difficult to implement in CFD readout-system?

Page 13: The ATLAS Pixel System Architecture

ATLAS - Systemtests

• First tests of mini-systems done:– 3 modules on a stave

– 6 modules on a partial disk

• Barrel setup (pigtail) looks close to something we could use …