the atomic construct a discussion

7/30/2019 The atomic construct a discussion

1/16

The Atomic Construct(a discussion)

Excitedly awaiting experimental results from CERN, the LHC (Large Hadron

Collider) programme, one is again returning to question the early models of the

atomic structure !he actual arrangement of electrons, protons, neutrons and other

particulates that are yet to "e disco#ered, ma$ing up an atom, remains open to

speculation Little conclusi#e e#idence exists that will allow a definiti#e atomic

construct to "e put forward "ut the electron relationship to the nuclear aggregate

remains open to speculation Experimental e#idence is awaited that will refute or

consolidate the concepts "eing put forward here for discussion

!he existing #isualisation of the relationship "etween the electron and the nuclear

proton is suggested to need impro#ement in as much, that the current model of or"itsin which electrons are said to circumscri"e the atom needs updating !he %hor model

of atomic structure has ser#ed science well "ut with modern experimental and

analytical methodology, a#aila"le information is suggesting that the atomic construct

needs remodelling &t was always difficult to #isualise the mayhem that must exist in

the standard or"ital theory

'or example &f electrons were "onded to the proton in the nucleus, the "ond "etween

the electron and the proton would need to "rea$ and reform with another proton as the

electron for example, found itself on the other side of the atom or, when the nelectron

from the neutron umps to the near"y proton !he charge of the proton nearest to the

electron would "e stronger and therefore exercise a more powerful effect on theelectrons on that side of the atom !here would "e a great deal of energy expended in

the plasticity of the nucleus as the energy requirements #aried from one side of the

nucleus to the other &n complex large atomic constructs, the frictional factors created

"y the constant reconstruction of "onds "etween the protons and electrons would

require a great deal of rearrangement of su"nuclear entities

* student proect in effect proposed that the electrons do not in practice, circumscri"e

the nucleus "ut are rather fixed in a space #olume a"o#e the proton which is

positioned directly "elow the electron at right angles to the electron position,

occupying the shortest distance "etween the electron and the proton +hat this model

proposed was an arrangement where the "ond "etween the electron and the protonwas fixed at a distance that was optimum for the gi#en energy state in which the atom

finds itself and the potential energy of the electron was fixed within resonance limits

related to the principal quantum num"ers !he electron resonates within a gi#en

#olume directly a"o#e the proton and the potential energy #aries depending on the

energy in the en#ironment *t a"solute temperatures the resonance #olume of the

electron would "e minimal and the #olume occupied "y the electron would "e smaller

than at room temperature

!he electron #olume would "e responsi#e and mo#e a"out space depending on energy

fluctuations in its locality so that the position of the electron relating to the proton

#aries, to "e anywhere in space a"o#e the proton, specified "y the potential energy ofthe %ohr or"ital &n mathematical terms the state is specified "y the chrodinger

Equation, in a wa#e function time dependant quantity that is "est descri"ed "y the

-


2/16


3/16

+hat is "eing considered here is the possi"ility that the nelectron trapped within the

#olume of the neutron, also electrically "alances the positi#e charge of the adacent

proton !he neutron has a positron, a positi#ely (#e) charged electron, whose charge

is "alanced "y an nelectron "ut the nelectron of this neutron, is also thought to

"alance the charge of the positron in the adacent proton !his apparent sharing of n

electrons is well understood in chemistry and is common in chemical "ondingD &t issuggested that that the nelectron of the neutron, resonates "etween the neutrons

positron and the protons positi#e charge &t is suggested that the neutron is constantly

reducing to a proton and then reforming "ac$ to a neutron, "y sharing an nelectron

&t is postulated that the electrical charges are in a state of flux !his highly dynamic

electron exchange which is said to "e going on in the nucleus, is thought to sta"ili;e

the "aryons and perhaps e#en "e the "ases of the strong nuclear force 'or example,

when a neutron is in a free state ie not su"ect to other electrical influences, it is seen

to decay in a"out -- seconds !he neutron when contained in the nucleus, is thought

to "e in a dynamic state of electrical flux, losing and gaining (F#e) charge, to in effect,

exhi"it electrical properties

.o#ing electrons constitute an electric current, which in turn, generates

electromagnetic fields !he nuclei of atoms are therefore sites of electric currents and

electromagnetic fields

!he strong force then "ecomes the interaction "etween the nelectrons and positrons

in the nuclear construct &t is a much stronger force than the wea$ force, which is said

to "e related to the electric and magnetic spin #ectors associated with fermion energy

Helium

*tomic No =

*tomic .ass 6

'ig =

/

/N N

!he structure of the helium atom consists of two protons, two electrons in the n


4/16

the positron charge would "e forced as far away as possi"le from the other positi#ely

charged particle in the nucleus Charged "aryons would occupy the furthest points

away from each other in the nucleus and as they are "onded to an electron or"iting in

space a"o#e the nucleus, he "est geometric arrangement for the positi#ely charged

nuclear particle, would "e at the shortest distance "etween the nucleus and the

electron !he electron:positron "ond would therefore "e arranged along the same coordinates and that would mean that the proton was arranged in the nucleus along

specified fixed coordinates, gi#ing "aryons a fixed position within the nucleus at any

gi#en time

!here is construct in the atomic particulate assem"ly

!he electron and positron would drag each other a"out the atomic #olume their

positions "eing dependent on pre#ailing energy conditions !he "onded proton mo#es

with the electron, maintaining the shortest distance "etween the two charged particles,

and maintaining its relationship to the electron along the same coordinate

&n the more complex atoms in /eriodic !a"le the arrangement is maintained "ecause

of physical conditions $eeping the relationship "etween the positi#ely charged proton

and electron, fixed along the same coordinate !his arrangement pro#ides a structural

"ases for the nuclear arrangement extending to #ery large complex atoms eg =?7G=

Granium

%eryllium is the 6thmem"er of the /eriodic !a"le, occupying a position in the =nd

/eriod in Broup &&* !his position classifies the element, the periodicity relating the

atom to its chemical properties &n a proposed classification see "elow, atoms are

classified according to the energy conditions in which they are compacted when

formed Iut there in the Gni#erse, atoms are aggregated according to pre#ailing

energy conditions !he larger the atomic composition the greater the amount of energy

needed to aggregate the atomic contents and the more energy atomic constructs

contain ee9 Limitless energy from Nucleons,

http9::wwwscri"dcom:doc:=656@?7:!otalNucleonicEnergy/eriodic!a"le

!a$ing a closer loo$ at the nuclear distri"ution of the positi#ely charged protons it

follows that each proton will occupy a position that is the shortest distance from the

negati#ely charged electron !hat specifies the location of the positron in the nucleus,

positioning itself along the same coordinates "onding the electron to the positron !o

expand this concept a drawing is enclosed to demonstrate the position of the positronof the proton, on the same coordinate forming the "ond with the electron9 ee 'ig ?

6
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24594638/Total-Nucleonic-Energy-Periodic-Tablehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/24594638/Total-Nucleonic-Energy-Periodic-Table


5/16

5 neutrons needed

to sta"ali;e nuclear

structure

%erylium

*tomic No 6

*tomic mass

'ig ?

!he position arrangement of "aryons within the nucleus "eing held together "y the

nuclear strong force would seem to "e determined "y the electronic field distri"ution

which is in a state of high dynamic flux, always adusting its position to attain the

optimum energy state 'ig 6 demonstrates an expanded drawing demonstrating the coordinate nature of the positron alignment in the proton

Nucle us/

/

/

/

'ig 6

Nucle us of %eryl ium

6 /rotons

%eryllium has an atomic mass of 4-=-7=amu

!he closer the charged particles the greater the force exerted "y the charges "ut this

charge drops off rapidly as the distance "etween the charged particles increases

%earing in mind that the electric charge exercises its force in a mathematical

relationship that is reflected "y the reciprocal #alue of distance "etween the charged

entities, to the power of 6 !he electric charge extends to infinity and must, li$e

gra#ity, exercise an effect on all other charged particles in the uni#erse !he uni#erse

then, is an electromagneticgra#itational energy construct No dou"t, other energy

terms contri"ute to this formation

!he .illennium /roect simulation, of the mass energy distri"ution in the Gni#erse,

exemplifies how the mass energy aggregates along the strongest fields ince this

5


6/16

arrangement in space has no name and gi#en that my wor$ suggests gra#ity to "e

propagational, in addition to the electromagnetic fields that are generated "y the

mo#ing charged particles, & ha#e for con#enience, called the mass energy distri"ution

in the uni#erse, 1!he ElectroBra#imetric Net3

'ig 5

%a"ics ElectroBra#imetric Net

!he "right areas are galaxies

!he extremely complex and poorly understood arrangement of the nuclear

components must ne#er the less "e reflected in the position of the charged particles

em"odied in the positi#e and negati#e entities, specifying the fundamental

characteristics of the "aryons

None of the currently modelled su"atomic physical constructs has "een pro#en

experimentally so, much of what is currently "eing wor$ed on is speculati#e or a

response to mathematical modelling .athematicians see the su"atomic world in

difficult to grasp models !o gi#e an example9 2uote9 *nd e#ery physical change of a

charged particle constitutes a modulation imposed upon its #irtual photonic acti#ity

creating its electromagnetic field !hese modulations are simply coherently collected

to "reach the threshold of the #irtual (third) orthoframe, passing into the second

orthoframe, then "reaching the threshold of that frame, and passing into the first

orthoframe, which is the frame of the electromagnetic field !he electric field is

coupled "y the dual closure mechanism to the gra#itational field, and also to the mass!he entire mechanism constitutes the coupling of the #irtual state reality to o"ser#a"le

state reality, and the electromagnetic field plays a prominent part in this coupling End

of 2uote

!his phenomenon of electrical charge exchange may explain why electrons resonate

within the potential energy "ands of the principal potential energy le#els and why an

electrons position can ne#er "e precisely pin pointed &f the postulated electric charge

is mo#ing from say neutron to the proton, there must "e a change in "ond formation

"etween the positi#e "aryon and the electron !hat too, will reflect on the electron

position in space Extremely complex, highly dynamic electrical field flux exists

which no currently a#aila"le scientific methodology can accurately pin point

@


7/16

How is it that the charged particles ie the positron and the electron, do not collapse

into each other gi#en that their charges are attracted8 +ell, the pu;;le relates to some

already well esta"lished e#idence for the noncompati"ility of fundamental particles

ie the fundamental entities are proposed to "e irreconcila"le under any condition in

the uni#erse

*n unexpected phenomenon is seen when an electron is fired directly at the proton

!he electron in all cases, #eers away from the positi#ely charged proton as it

approaches the nuclear #olume !his is thought to "e due to the incompati"ility of the

electric and magnetic forces exerted "y fundamental constructs Inly when enough

energy is used to accelerate the electron towards the proton does the electron penetrate

the forces encasing the nucleus, to interact with the proton and change it into a

neutron ee 'ig 5

*ccelerating an electron

towards the positi#ely charged proton

results in the electron "eing deflected

Inly when enough energy is pro#ided

does the negati#ely charged electron

pene tra te the strong nucl ear fiel d

to interact and form a neutron

'ig @

/

!he repulsion seen at the nuclear "oundary is also seen when the matter antimatter

reaction occurs &n this case the electromagnetic forces are stronger than the repulsi#e

forces that seem to exist in all fundamental entities and the matter antimatter particles

are "rought into close enough proximity to allow a reaction which annihilates the

mass of the two entities and transforms the particles into pure energy, in the simplest

terms, two gamma rays

!he resultant o"ser#ation is that the two gamma rays are seen to escape the reacti#e

space in directly the opposite directions !his is ta$en to mean that the gamma rays

are repulsi#e and mo#e in opposite directions to roughly tra#erse space along the-74

degree line

!he new construct of nelectron, positron and the rest of the "aryon composition does

not emit an energy "urst seen in the matter antimatter annihilation !he

electron:positron interaction does not occur and the two entities remain separate in theneutron, presuma"ly, occupying some potential energy le#el within the "aryon,

resonating a"out that potential energy le#el which is contained "y the "aryonic field

>


8/16

.any mathematical treatments of su" atomic structure exist and it is extremely

difficult to ma$e sense of the mathematics in terms of ordinary language "ut here

quoted, is a translation that is for most part graspa"le

Electric 'ields

Quote: *ccording to the present theory of physics, the electric field is due to the

continual emission and rea"sorption of #irtual photons Let us examine that concept

ust a little further, "ecause there are some interesting conclusions we can ma$e if we

are not afraid to ta$e the final conceptual step to the "ottom line implications

'irst, each ordinary (o"ser#a"le) photon in the uni#erse consists of a little piece

(quantum) of nono"ser#a"le action !he units of action are energy times time,

orMVIT (mass x length x length:time) !he quantum of action in the photon is not

separated into a separate piece of time and a separate piece of energy *nd also, the

quantum of action is a fixed, constant si;e or magnitude, gi#en "y /lanc$Js

constant h as h = @ @=@ x -4K oulesecond

*ll this says is that an ordinary photon has a certain si;e that is quite fixed, and it is

made of the su"stance MactionM which is totally non percei#a"le and nono"ser#a"le

Inly changes in action are percei#a"le, o"ser#a"le, or detecta"le, ne#er fundamental

action itself o physics already prescri"es a uni#erse made out of action, and that

uni#erse has no length, no time, no energy, no space, no concrete existence et from

it can "e ta$en "y differentiation (which is simply separation) any length, any time,

any energy

Howe#er, only a single quantum at a time changes or is separated 2uanta do not

superpose * single quantum can "e split or fissioned into, say, a piece of energy and a

piece of time

+e can get as large or as small a piece of energy (ie, change in energy) as we wish

simply "y adusting the piece of time accordingly !he same type of separation is

possi"le for momentum and length !he fragments of the action quantum (say, a piece

of energy and a piece of time) must then "e stuc$ "ac$ together again (ie, fused "ac$

into an action quantum) to get rid of them, and this particular part of the process has

essentially "een ignored "y physicists *nyhow, getting rid of the fragments (which

ga#e us a piece of comparati#e physical change energy #ersus time or

momentum #ersus length) causes the ustcompleted physical change to #anish

o at its most fundamental le#el, the entire uni#erse is continually "eing created and

then destroyed in sequence !he continual creation of a tiny piece of time and then the

destruction of the piece of time ma$es us experience reality or change as if we were a

pointer mo#ing along a time line

+e cannot see time "ecause it is continually "eing destroyed "y the change process,

the #ery process of physical detection or o"ser#ation itself

Now if we in#o$e another $ind of change, a #irtual change, such that its si;e is always

smaller than the actual quantumJs si;e, then this $ind of change cannot "e detected,e#en theoretically !he concept of a #irtual change is one such that the quantity of

action that was changed was deli"erately made smaller than the si;e required to throw

the switch of detecta"le or o"ser#a"le change

7


9/16

o if we ha#e a #irtual photon, it is simply a piece of action whose magnitude is

always less than h. Here again, we can still get any amount of energy change we

desire, merely "y adusting the si;e of the piece of time associated with that energy

!his then means that the #irtual photon is not "ig enough to "reach the threshold of

quantum change, and so cannot "e o"ser#ed or detected

*nd here is the interesting "ottom line ignored "y most physicists and almost all the

pragmatic scientists who run the orthodox esta"lishments !he totally uno"ser#a"le,

undetecta"le #irtual photons "eing emitted and a"sor"ed are concei#ed as creating the

electric field at the same time as o"ser#a"le physical change (ordinary quantum

change) occurs *nd the electric field, of course, can cause or induce change of

sufficient magnitude to "reach the quantum threshold and result in o"ser#a"le change

!he "ottom line is this9 the #irtual state can "e collated and collected to sufficient

magnitude to "reach the quantum threshold and induce ordinary o"ser#a"le physical

change !he electromagnetic field already does precisely thisD

*nd if reality can "eha#e this way, as the physicists show, then let us simply accept

that and apply itD

Note that we ha#e now resol#ed the pro"lem of negati#e time !he fusion process

replaces the little positi#e piece of time that was formed in the fission process *

continual stream of such replacements constitutes a continual stream of su" tractions

of positi#e time Hence this represents a negati#e time operational channel

.any of the equations of physics, eg, .axwellJs equations of the electromagnetic

field, should "e reexamined with a #iew to this negati#e time operation Oirac

calculated such an entity, an electron tra#eling "ac$wards in time, and noted that it

would appear as a positi#ely charged electron tra#eling forward in time He thus

predicted the positron which was later found in la"oratory experiments %ut of e#en

more fundamental importance is that e#ery piece of charged matter in the uni#erse has

such an opposite twin the well $nown antimatter concept o antimatter protons,

neutrons, molecules, and physical structures exist &ndeed, this physical reality that we

normally percei#e has its antimatter twin which we are also unra#eling "ac$wards as

we go

%ut here again the "ottom line is far reaching9 it means that we can coherently collectthe #irtual state to produce matter or its anti matter, which after all are nothing "ut

macroscopic assem"lages of quantum changes, and we can thus get free energy,

materiali;ation and demateriali;ation, teleportation, and antigra#ity "y means of

special modifications and de#elopments of electromagnetic circuits

Each photon carries a small piece of time *nd the entire #irtual state reality is

hanging onto that small piece of time as a modulation !hat is where the pro"a"ilities

are riding, in terms of the ordinary monocular interpretation of quantum mechanics,

all of these pro"a"ilities, and all possi"ilities, are concretely real and occupy

orthogonal uni#erses ince they all share the same single time dimension, there is a

time "ridge or time channel connecting the uni#erses Each mo#e or change in one ofthem crosstal$s a tiny "it into each of the others ince it is the photon which carries

them, then each photon contains all possi"ilities and #irtual states modulated upon

itself


10/16

/hoton interaction thus in#ol#es the communication of these possi"ilities and #irtual

states to the o"ect with which the interaction occurs End of Quote

&t follows therefore that the quanta of energy that is fixed in si;e is non percei#a"le,

non o"ser#a"le "ut is a piece of action in space time &t is not the action "ut thechange of action that is the detecta"le phenomenon !his pertur"ation in space time is

a non superimposi"le phenomenon "ut is a fundamental entity, on which the entire

uni#erse is structured &t is the characteristics of this unit of energy that is the "ases of

all we o"ser#e in the uni#erse and the fields it generates as it mo#es through space

time, are the critical components of aggregated mass !he spins of the photon occurs

in at least four spatial dimensions, generating properties which when aggregated in

su"atomic particles, manifest the characteristics of the su" atomic fields that hold the

energy within the nuclear construct

!he fields holding the su"atomic particles within the nuclear en#elope is the o"ect of

the study in this discussion "ecause it is the nature of this containment and itscharacteristics that needs to "e understood !he disassem"ly of aggregated su"atomic

masses to release energy from nucleons, will depend on science finding a way to

o#ercome or wea$en the fields containing the su"atomic particles in their construct

!he answer may already "e staring us in the face "ecause when matter antimatter

particulates interact it is o"ser#ed that a huge amount of energy is released from such

interaction and the end product is "asically, the release of two gamma rays ee 'ig @

&nterestingly, these released units of energy are o"ser#ed to escape the collision

en#ironment in directly the opposite directions, at extreme #elocity

.atter*ntimatterinteract

to annihilate each other

and release a gamma ray each

Electromagnetic "urst

of energy released

/hoton from antimatter

(mirror image

ofthat from matter)

/hoton from matter

(&rreconcila"le with

antimatterphoton

underany conditions

in the uni#erse)

'ig >

!he explanation for this o"ser#ation may lie in the way these fundamental particulates

are constructed and it may "e the geometry of the electromagnetic #ectors that is the

crucial elementary factor pre#enting the uni#erse from destroying itself

-4


11/16

'ig 7

* graphical representation is put forward for discussion, as an example of how the

electric and magnetic components of the energy time pertur"ations are assem"led to

ma$e then totally irreconcila"le, under any conditions in the uni#erse E#en whenphotons are engulfed in the "lac$ hole en#ironment, it is the structural difference that

pre#ents them from destroying each other ee 'ig 7, a graphical model demonstrating

a mirror image construct which demonstrates an example of irreconcila"le electric and

magnetic #ectors, prefera"ly, when the photon is structured in a closed loop

arrangement

!he closed loop construct of the fundamental energy entity the photon is #ery

attracti#e "ut there is a huge pro"lem with this model "ecause in a closed loop the

pertur"ation should demonstrate a dipole which has to date ne#er "een detected 'or

example the recently scientifically confirmed mirror image nature of matter antimatter

elements pro#ides a clear way forward when discussing how such elementalparticulates are a"le to aggregate mass within their field parameters and how the

positi#e and negati#e charges "eing more powerful than the repulsi#e forces of the

generated fields, interact to release energy during the matter antimatter annihilations

+hat is causing the pro"lem is the forces at play when closed loop arrangements are

considered, namely the electromagnetic fields forced into a closed loop arrangement

+hen the open ended energy wa#es generally used to represent photons are forced

into a closed loop arrangement the fields within the loop are forced into close

proximity to act on each other and therefore the a#aila"le energy constricts the filed

into a small #olume within the loop whereas the energy fields on the outer periphery

expand to occupy a much larger #olume !his lo" sided field configuration means that

there is a strong field and a wea$ field region in the construct of the closed looped

--


12/16

pertur"ation !hat would pro#ides dipole properties None ha#e e#er "een detected

"ut see 'ig 7* and 'ig 7%

!he toroidal configuration ma$es sense "ecause as the energy entity spins the electric

and the magnetic #ectors should induce a toroidal state which should "e independent

of the forces at play as the particle precesses in space Breat expectations at the futurefindings on these fundamental particulates

'ig 7%

/roposed field distortion in the closed loop system

manifesting a strong and wea$ field dipoles

!he mechanism "y which energy is compacted into atoms, out there in the #astness of

the uni#erse, is one of "rute force and trying to ma$e atoms here on earth has "een

achie#ed in fusion experiments !he energy costs of forcing two atoms of hydrogen to

com"ine into one atom of helium is #ery considera"le

=D- ?T- 6He= -n4 17.2.e0

-=


13/16

&n the quest for limitless energy, a #ia"le way of releasing energy trapped in atoms

needs to "e identified and one way of doing this is to wea$en the fields encasing

energy within su" atomic particles

'or a "etter understanding of the fields that encase nuclear contents, it will "e usefulto consider the ma$eup of su"atomic particles and their relationships, as they are

thought at uni#ersity physics classes *s a "asic introduction to the contents of nuclear

"aryons it is useful to understand that not all elements in the su"atomic structure ha#e

as yet "een identified nor are the functions and components of su" atomic particles

clearly understood "ut for example, a proton is made up of ? quar$s, two are said to

"e up and the other one down &n the Neutron, there are also ? quar$s, two of which

are down and the other one is up !he up, down classification, simply refers to energy

le#els which these entities manifest

!o put this graphically9

!he force 1 3 that holds the quar$s within the "aryon #olume is said to "e the

1Bluon3

'ig 'ig -4

!he a"o#e apparently minor difference "etween the proton and the neutron, of ha#ingquar$s in the up or down position, is crucial to the ma$e up of atoms 'or example, no

complex atom can exist without neutrons "ecause these "aryons sta"ilise the

positi#ely charged protons &t is thought that this sta"ilisation mechanism in#ol#es the

nelectron that is contained "y the neutron, tra#ersing across to the proton, to con#ert

it to a neutron

!he original "aryon that has donated the nelectron "ecomes a proton so that there is a

constant exchange of nelectrons that holds the nuclear "aryons within the nucleus

!he position of the nelectron determines the energy le#el of quar$s which adopt an

up or down position within the fermions (mass carrying entities) &n its simplest form,

the mo#ement of the nelectron can "e summarised with equations9

no P p e 0e

-?


14/16

&n electron capture "y the proton9

p e P no 0ep < proton, n < neutron, e electron, 0e < neutrino, 0e < antineutrino

&n the first equation the nelectron mo#es from the neutron to the recei#ing quar$, the

proton, the quar$ capturing the nelectron "ecomes more energetic and flips to the

down position and the "aryon "ecome a neutron !his simple gain of an nelectron,

completely changes the nature and properties of this fermion /resuma"ly the electron

positioned a"o#e the nucleus in the principal quantum energy le#els, which was

attached to that proton, must switch its attachment to the newly formed proton in the

nucleus !he complexity of this switching of "ond formation with electrons in space

a"o#e the nucleus, ma$es it #ery difficult to grasp how the %hor .odel of electron

or"its functions

!he instantaneous nelectron exchange in the nucleus is hard to quantify and not only"ecause the exchange does not equate on energy terms !here is clearly much wor$ to

"e done on the su"nuclear mechanics "ut the shift of the nelectron from one "aryon

to another, pro#ides a means for science to manipulate nuclear contents #ia

electrochemistry !he contents of the nucleus are held together "y well understood

"onding, chemistry specifies

No nucleus can remain sta"le if the neutron num"ers are not "alancing the repelling

characteristics resulting from the protons #e charge Neutrons play a #ital role in

sta"ilising nuclear contents !he possi"ility of remo#ing the nelectron from the

neutron and thus increasing the num"er of protons in relation to the num"er of

neutrons, would cause a field insta"ility, that will result in fission of the nucleus &fthe ration of neutrons to protons is not close to the optimum, the nucleus is seen to

decay in one way or another and energy is released "y restructuring towards the

optimum proton to neutron ratio

Electrochemistry mechanisms would seem to pro#ide a means to release enormous

amounts of energy, from any element in the /eriodic !a"le

!he pro"lem for science is that information that will allow science to pro#ide answers

to the mechanisms "y which the su"nuclear construct is sta"ilised is only ust

"ecoming a#aila"le with date from the LHC No dou"t, as the next generation

machines "ecome functional, the answers will emerge "ut the nature of the su"

nuclear mechanics remains open to discussion 'or example, other models of the su"

nuclear exists and one such, which ma$es sense to me is .!Cashes .odel

!his &ranian nuclear physicist has put forward a new model of a su"atomic composite

that is su"stantially more stri$ing that the current models of nuclear ma$eup !he ups,

downs, pin$s, yellows, greens, fat, thin, pretty, ugly nomenclature used for su"atomic

components taught in the science curricula is confusing and so clumsy, that & ha#e

a#oided e#en trying to understand it

Qashes model is wonderful &nstead of the up quar$s, down quar$s etc he usesmeaningful dynamic energy concept nomenclature that seems o"#ious and a"o#e all,

he incorporates dar$ matter into his su" "aryonic aggregation !he "asic concept

-6


15/16

Qashe has put forward is one where similar magnetic fields are entangled, to form an

1&ntegrated Oynamic Energy ystem3

imilar magnetic fields forming an 1&ntegrated Oynamic Energy ystem3

+e ha#e seen earlier in this discussion that energy is forced into aggregated su"

atomic constructs in high energy en#ironments such as the super no#a, relati#istic ets,

suns etc to "e compressed into a small #olume, and aggregate into the 1&nitial

'undamental /lasma Constructs3 eg a Neutron ee pictures9

1&nitial 'undamental /lasma Constructs

Qashes model is saying that for example the neutron is an aggregated dynamic

energy state that is composed of matter, antimatter and dar$ matter !his fits well with

the idea that dar$ matter is an endothermic "asic energy construct that is used to ma$e

up the energy content of the nuclear mass *nd that fits #ery nicely with the concept

that the uni#erses gar"age disposal facility ie the "lac$ hole, attritions mass into fine

particles and somewhere in that en#ironment pure energy is released and that energyis recom"ined again into the 1&nitial ta"le Entanglement3 that needs further energy

to form quar$s etc !otal recycling of mass energy occurs in the "lac$ hole

en#ironment

-5


16/16

Ince it is learned how to release energy contained in su" "aryonic components, there

will "e a#aila"le to humanity, limitless amounts of energy, so that explorers will "e

a"le to tra#el the uni#erse and use up any "it of roc$ to release "aryonic energy to fuel

space ships & also agree that once the "aryonic construct is "ro$en down to its

elements then there will "e no dangerous radiation, emitted from nuclear reactions*ll released energy will "e usea"le in the energy consumption reactors so that nothing

remains "ut pure depleted energy

High energy content of mass would "e processed in energy reactors to release energy

that is used to power #arious systems and changed into lower energy forms Energy

can neither "e created nor destroyed, "ut is simply modified "y whate#er process it

powers !his 1depleted3 energy is expelled "ac$ into space where it is e#entually

changed "ac$ into the high energy state /erfect form of recycling

Breat days are ahead for humanity as we learn how to manipulate the energy stored in

the su"atomic constructs

-@

the atomic construct a discussion

Documents