the blue donkey
TRANSCRIPT
The Blue Donkey
by Suniti Namjoshi
Suniti Namjoshi Born in Mumbai, India in 1941
A poet and fabulist, her best know work is,
perhaps, Tales of the Blue Donkey (1986).
An important writer in contemporary Indian
literature in English. She has several books of
verse and fable to her credit.
Now lives in the UK where she works as a
full-time writer. Her poetry, fables, articles and
reviews have been featured in various
anthologies and journals in India, Canada, the
US, Australia and Britain. A deep engagement
with issues of gender, sexual orientation,
cultural identity and human rights infuses her
work.
Inspired by Marc Chagall
Marc Chagall’s Paintings in an art book
Once Upon a time a blue donkey
lived by a red bridge.
The councilors of the town was not satisfied by the blueness of the donkey. They wanted the donkey to become the purest and silkiest white. The matter soon turned into a political issue. One party said that the donkey do not and will never change color. Another said that the donkey is required to be a nondescript grey.
OR
‘Just because donkeys have never been known to be white, it does not follow that a donkey is incapable of achieving whiteness. Your argument imposes arbitrary limitation on the creature’s potential.’
‘Good heavens! Are you suggesting that the donkey’s blueness may be a matter of culpable willfulness rather than a mere genetic mischance?’
So they all approached the donkey, who happened to be munching a bright pink carrot.
O Donkey we’d like you to turn inoffensive grey
or else move onCan’t and won’t
I ‘m a perfectly good donkey. What
exactly is the matter with you?
Look again
Your blueness troubles us. It clashes with our bridge,
as does the pinkness of your carrots. Oh what shall
we do? We cannot agree among ourselves.
1
2
3
4
They looked and argued and after a while most of
them got used to the blueness of the donkey and
didn’t notice it anymore. But a few remained
strongly that blueness was inherent, and a few
protested that it was essentially intentional. The
last occasionally brought her a bunch of blue
flowers which she put in a vase.
APOTHEOSIS
In the middle of her years the Blue Donkey acquires a certain fame. The townsfolk grew quite proud of her. She attracted tourist. Blue Donkey bars and bistro sprouted, and there was a brisk trade in T-shirts and Blue Donkey Toys. She herself was installed in a stable and in order to see her it became necessary to by tickets.
At first the Blue Donkey enjoyed the attention, then she grew bored, and then she took to questioning the tourists. But the tourist would just say that they admire her so much and his fame reached all over the world. And she felt pleased.
Soon she began to look scruffy. They shut down the stable
and begged her to grow her fur quickly. Then they
discovered that her fur turned into a beautiful grey. They
were horrified.
But what about us?
What can we possibly tell the tourists?
I am retiring
Tell them the truth. Tell them
that I have become a legend. But will it
work?
Of course, Truth is dazzling.
1
2
3
4
5
THE END
LITERARY ANALYSIS
Blue Donkey Fables The character, The Blue Donkey, is already a feminist sense as it was depicted
as a female by “She”.
The Blue Donkey can be considered as a variation on the trickster figure but
Blue Donkey does not play tricks on people, rather she maneuvers them into a
logical feedback loop.
The first example of this, in the first of the Blue Donkey Stories, is rather crude.
A blue donkey lives by a red bridge. The local councilors decide this is inartistic
and demand the donkey change color, although there is a division between
those who want to demand the donkey change to the purest white, and those
who demand reasonableness, and that the donkey become grey. Buried here is
a sly dig that if one compromises, one can lose sight of the unreasonableness of
the original demand. But the donkey refuses anyway.
Blue Donkey Fables Her refusal to engage in the debate leads them to argue around her,
which is what they were doing anyway. The blue donkey’s resistance
is philosophical judo, forcing the prejudiced to argue with themselves.
Then as the Blue Donkey tales expand, the donkey becomes The
Blue Donkey. She becomes such a crowd pleaser that in order to get
some peace she retires, only to find there are rumors she has died.
Relevance Of ColorsWhite & Grey
Considered to be the color of PERFECTION
Masculinity
Blue
• It
symbolizes
trust, loyalty,
wisdom,
confidence,
intelligence,
faith, truth,
and heaven.
Red
•Red is the
color of fire and
blood, so it is
associated with
energy, war,
danger,
strength, power,
determination
as well as
passion, desire,
and love.
Pink
•Femininity, grace
and gentility
Namjoshi’s Pattern in The Blue Donkey
Pattern A : challenging hegemony
the Donkey is confronted by a challenge to her identity,
the Donkey argues or does not
Pattern B: The narratology of prejudice and Pattern C: the trickster
• the Donkey is confronted by unexpected support
• the Donkey discovers this support to be based on “orientalism”
• the Donkey finds a solution which forces the supporter and ourselves to consider the nature of the support we offer.
Pattern D:
• Blue Donkey is patronized by the hegemony.
• Blue Donkey tricks the hegemony into agreeing with her in order to gain the “sexiness” that association with the outsider can gift.
• Blue Donkey shows us how to make the hegemony look ridiculous when it substitutes cultural appropriation for genuine respect.
Pañcatantra
Namjoshi builds her feminist and resistance strategies within the narrative patterns of traditional Indian/Hindu story telling.
The Hindu tradition has a number of allegorical sequences, the most widely known of which is the Pañcatantra.
This is a collection of stories arranged in five groups, each one of which is intended to illustrate the application of one major rule of wisdom.
In these parables animals and birds act as cartoon figures which highlight the outstanding characteristics to be examined.
All of the Pañcatantra parables are set within a frame narrative of stories devised for the teaching of a king’s children by the scholar Visnu Sarma. Sarma classified his lessons under five headings; Mitrabheda (Estrangement of Friends), Mitrasamprapti (Winning of Friends), Kakolukiyam (Of Crows and Owls), Labdhapranasa(Loss of Gains) and Apariksitakaraka (Rash Deeds).
Pañcatantra
There is rarely an external narrator, except that all
these stories figure as “stories the Blue Donkey told”
and we already know that she has decided to
become legend. Like the stories told in the
Pancatranta there is the sense that they might well
be “true” within the borders of the tale.
As the tales develop, the Blue Donkey is herself
increasingly figured as sage, and many of the
stories become dialogue between her and
audience.
Blue Donkey Fables Pranik, a literary critique argues that “The plasticity of the legend or myth which makes
for the lovely interplay of the imagination has encouraged the dominance of fantasy in
the Indian narrative mould…The author fantasizes, so does the reader, so that fantasy
becomes an interface that the reader’s imagination shares with the author. The reader
is allowed to be as creative as the author… “
Fantasization is thus a privileged enterprise in the Indian narrative.
Namjoshi’s work construct new feminist and resistance narratologies, but these are
clearly sited within the Indian traditions of fantasation .
Namjoshi’s tales construct is of recognition of wrongness, recognition of self and
resistance
References
Suniti Namjoshi, Tales of the Blue Donkey (London:
Women’s Press, 1986)
Dwivedi, N. A., Studies in Contemporary Verse: A
Collection of Critical Essays on Female Poets,
Allahabad:
Prakash Book Depot, 1984. Paniker, K. Ayyappa,
Indian Narratology, Indira Ghandi National Centre
for the Arts (no date provided).
Namjoshi_Mendlesohn.pdf