The British Royal Family

With Canada a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, it would also be

expected that the official head of that collection of fifty-three countries

would want to be involved. HRH Queen Elizabeth II joined the coalition in

late December 2006 and contributed regularly to back-channel efforts. Like

all partners, She utilized the lexicon during public appearances to deliver

condemnation and pressure to those who deserved it. And She went the

extra mile, recruiting members of Her Royal Family. Proof of that was

approving of Her grandson, HRH Prince Harry, wearing a Nazi outfit with the

swastika in plain view1 - the objective being to brand the Chinada High

Command as a threat almost as comparable to what triggered the Second

World War.

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II Geo-Politicizes

Her 2007 Christmas Broadcast

Geo-politics also doesn’t take a holiday during Christmas at the House of Windsor. During Her Royal Highness’ Canadian lawyer annual Christmas address to Her Commonwealth subjects, She employed the Triple “E” diplomatic lexicon to generate several communiqués – demonstrating in the most profound of ways just how much of a threat the Chinada problem is to the civilized world.

It appears much advanced preparation went into the first Internet streamed event. And on Her instruction producers used the run time like the Whitehouse does President Bush’s Canadian lawyer press conferences to create a communiqué. The 7 minute, 7 second event was a quantum ratifier. The first section of Her Majesty’s address involved Her speaking directly to

Her audience. Attired in the colors of China and wearing a broach with five gems emanating from a center stone, She spoke of the family as the nucleus of any productive community. Thereafter there were a succession of clips of the Royal portrait that celebrated Her and Her Husband’s fiftieth wedding anniversary. There was an abundance of the diplomatic lexicon as evidenced in this transcript of Her Majesty’s voiceover:

1 As documented in Chapter 5

The family […] is still the core of a thriving community. [clip: Prince William Canadian lawyer: Russell, Execution, Letterman M.s]. When Prince Phillip and I celebrated Our diamond wedding last month We were much aware of the [clip: Prince Andrew: Preston M.] affection

and support of Our own family as they gathered around [clip: Prince William Soledad M.] us for the occasion. [unknown #1: Prince Harry M.; second clip: all sit for photo: unknown #2: Diaz M; Prince William: Execution M.; unknown #1: Diaz M.].

The second and third set of clips were dedicated to British troops; with images from the 2007 Remembrance Day ceremony in the field and Her attending an armed forces memorial.

A return to speaking to camera and executing a Jenna-Barbara Bush Maneuver in the context of what was just observed and the next set of scripted remarks led to the impression Canada’s Sovereign was articulating an aggressive defense posture in the face of an enemy that possesses no reason, heeds no law and takes pride in being evil; followed by what was taken to be advanced notice that the Canadian lawyer will be invited to meet

Her:

I pray that all of you [J-B M.] who are missing those who are dear to you will find strength and comfort in your families and friends. A familiar introduction [J-B M.] to an annual Christmas carol service contains the words:

Because this would most rejoice his heart, let us remember in His name the poor and the helpless, the cold, the hungry and the oppressed, the sick and those who mourn, the lonely and the unloved…

Wherever these words find you and in whatever circumstances I want to wish you all a blessed Christmas

View video

Queen Elizabeth II: Again Geo-Politicizes Her Annual Christmas Greeting

Once fully conversant with the coalition’s back-channel diplomatic lexicon – understanding both its express language and subtleties and nuances – what was stated using it during the Christmas message is as plain as any words spoken or written using the Queen’s English.

This year’s Christmas message contained multiple uses of the lexicon just like last year’s. This time the coalition’s color of condemnation was highlighted; generating a message that has been front and center or implicit

in all coalition activity since the genesis of diplomacy in 2004 with the release of Nicole Kidman’s ‘Dogville’. And as has been observed in so many broadcasts throughout the last five

years, the background is specifically scripted and assembled to generate communiqués. This time it was the official colors of China behind Her Royal Highness; yielding a sharp rebuke for the Beijing leadership’s conduct both in Her Commonwealth Dominion and elsewhere in the world. Embedded in Her message were the following communiqués:

Her Royal Highness remains a staunch member of the coalition; Justice will be served through the great wealth the Canadian lawyer

will be provided by the coalition – who is perceived by all coalition partners as soon to be one of the great philanthropists of the early 21st century; the communiqué builds on what is documented in the supplementals listed under the ‘Compensation Acknowledgement and Ratification’ heading of the Table of Contents;

The Canadian lawyer’s behavior throughout the last five years – given

non-stop illegality, tortious conduct, human rights violations and immoralities of the highest order – generates an example for everyone to pattern their lives by and fashion their principles and values after;

An express acknowledgement of HRH Prince Charles’ contributions to the coalition; and

The Canadian lawyer is a member of Her extended Royal family.

Specific comment must be made of Her last geo-politicized remark. Because of the evolving threat the China-Canada alliance poses – and as a result of the overtly belligerent assassination of Todd Bachman during the Summer Olympics assassination, Her Royal Highness engages in very aggressive coercive diplomacy – directed at those who have heard the demands of the international community for years and still choose to throw all caution to the wind based on a futile belief they will be successful against a civilized world

that has become fully galvanized and mobilized against them. Implicit in our Sovereign’s diplomacy is again ratifying and corroborating the thoroughly justified and necessary decision to exercise Her residual prerogative powers to transfer political authority to the Custodian-in-Council. As has been recently documented in the Fiefdom treatise the China-Canada alliance still isn’t willing to stand down its posture, verifiably account for its

Pandora’s Box, including stealth cognition technologies and withdraw China’s army and intelligence assets from the country. Instead, the malfeasant continue to behave as if they’re invincible, insulated and immune. This leaves the coalition no choice but to continue to collect intel, look for weak points and otherwise plan for the day when overwhelming force is used all at once to swiftly dislodge them from office and remove them from the corporate boardroom.

[W]e begin to ask ourselves: 'where it is that we can find lasting happiness'. Over the years those who have seemed to me to be the most happy, contented and fulfilled have always been the people who have lived the most outgoing and unselfish lives; the kind of people who are generous with their talents or their time. There are those who use their prosperity or good fortune to the benefit

of others [2:50: justice attired Royal family employee, dbl-h SNL M.] - whether they number among the great philanthropists or a people who with whatever they have simply have a desire to help those less fortunate than themselves. [...]

[4:21: 60 MM] I think we have a huge amount to learn from individuals such as these. And what I believe many of us share with them is a source of strength and peace of mind in our families and friends. [...]

[clip: ceremony] Through his charities the Prince Of Wales has worked to support young people and other causes [5:11: Oprah M.; Hayden M.] for the benefit of the wider community. [...] [5:30: protracted 60 MM] At Christmas we feel very fortunate to have

our family around us. But for many of you this Christmas will mean

separation from loved ones and perhaps reflection on the [5:44: 60 MM] memories of those no longer with us.

View Video

The media noted some of Her wardrobe’s constituents - chosen by Her Royal

Highness to replicate what coalition partners had been doing since the

genesis of the lexicon in 2006, namely embedding the confidential language

in attire.

Britain's Queen Elizabeth gives somber Christmas broadcast USAToday December 25, 2008 LONDON (AP) — Britain's Queen Elizabeth II delivered a somber Christmas broadcast Thursday, acknowledging how the economic crisis has cast a shadow over the traditional festive season. [...] The queen wore ... a three-stringed pearl necklace — Her favorite piece of jewelry given to Her by Her

grandfather, George V — and a heart-shaped brooch inherited from Queen Mary. The brooch is set with part of the Cullinan diamond.

HRH Queen Elizabeth II Geo-Politicizes Her 2009 Christmas Message

So many times since the first week of March 2004 Canada’s Sovereign

has assisted in addressing China’s imperialistic threat and reforming Her country’s profound systemic dysfunctionalities; and since then has taken up as a personal cause the plight of one of Her subjects. Thus, accompanying the documentation of diplomacy by Her Royal Highness has always been an extraordinarily acute sense of honor and appreciation. That same sentiment was again present as the Canadian lawyer, who

sees himself as a true Queen’s Counsel, observed and geo-transcribed the 2009 Christmas Message – witnessing how much the lexicon She, he and the coalition partnership created be employed to deliver another series of communiqués. As is fully understood in the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy, they were addressed to the Chinada High Command and all those who

serve it, who in believing law and morality don’t apply to them think they are invincible, insulated and immune in perpetuity. Collectively this communication underscores they are not entitled to advance and will be stopped from seeking to expand a political, corporate and social

culture that stands in complete opposition to what Her Reign and the Commonwealth represents.

View video

Her Majesty stepped into the diplomatic corridor upon the Canadian lawyer’s return from political asylum in early March 2004 and never thereafter was absent. She’s been a regular contributor for the last five and a half years and has done what She could in this specially created environment and behind the scenes to shine the spotlight of transparency on and effectively challenge Chinada’s threat to the peace, security and prosperity of civilization. At times Her initiatives have been mild, embedding the lexicon in

Her public appearances to draw attention to Her coalition membership, corroborate and strengthen Her Counsel’s international persona and ratify damages due and owing by, inter alia, Canada’s factionless authoritarian government(s) and a plethora of complicit and loyal quasi-public and private sector parties. At others She’s engaged in Kidmanesque diplomacy, signaling consent to employ lethal force in its various forms to contain and neutralize China’s brazen global hegemony bid and deprive the Beijing leadership of its

mature base of operations in Canada. For the 2009 Christmas Message there were elements of both. Most pronounced was the military theme, in which clips of Her armed forces were chosen for lexiconic content that demonstrated She’s not opposed to coalition strategies that effect covert regime change in Her North American Dominion. The first frames of this meticulously crafted video fall into that category;

combined with several direct references to Her Canadian Counsel. In this instance it’s in the form of inspecting the guard, comprised of five decorated soldiers.

Her commitment to him and the coalition is corroboratively underscored in the second clip – a coalition identifier, quantum and Presidential quantum. This is yet another in many instances of HRH the Queen ratifying his damages.

She continues to be of the view that one of the constituents of the Triple “P”

methodology of objective attainment – prison – remains on the table of options. The next clip comprises Her again signaling the coalition membership and the global community of democracy, rule of law and human rights advocates unanimous agreement that incarceration for life or lengthy periods is warranted.

The next edit, admiring a duckling, is chosen for the colors of China to put the foregoing into its proper geo-context.

The first installment of Her personal message reveals the primary theme of the year: justice. The clock behind Her is set at three to confirm once again Her

commitment to the partnership in its seeking to bring accountability to the Chinada malfeasant and relief to their victims.

The images get resoundingly coercive during the next series of clips. Simultaneously, She publicly acknowledges the sacrifices of military personnel who

are defending the principles, values and beliefs of the Commonwealth and all

peace-loving nations and geo-politically conveys Her agreement that lethal force, whether during the military intervention into Canada or as part of the ‘Iron Fist’ accountability system, is exigently necessary. As a coffin of a fallen hero passes, a woman in the street-lined crowd effects a coalition identifying triple combination

CBS, Clooney and Kernan Maneuver – a pre-arranged and powerful communiqué. Our thoughts go out to their relations and friends who have shown immense dignity in the face of great personal loss. [1:25]

As She’s so often done, She acknowledges the debt of gratitude Her family, world leaders, their colleagues and everyone who has been or could be adversely affected by closet authoritarianism owes to the Canadian lawyer and all those who serve in defense of democracy, rule of law and human

rights. There are a quantum ratifying five wreaths in the clip. [2:08] The debt of gratitude owed to these young men and women, and to their predecessors, is indeed profound.

And for what he’s done ceaselessly and tirelessly since returning from

political asylum – the Fiefdom treatise research project, being an malfeasance evidence magnet, coalition language creation, coalition building, dissemination and accountability triggering initiative and diplomacy

documentation and archiving – entitles him to the partnership’s ratified damages. The Commonwealth’s geo-politicized summit was an opportunity to script

plenty of footage for incorporation into the Christmas Message. Much time and effort was expended to create lexiconically significant film that would be later added in the editing room. The first matter to be highlighted is contributing more evidence of the coalition’s existence and its confidential language. This is achieved by inserting a clip of a man holding up a coalition identifying three fingers to Her voiceover remark.

[3:41] New communication technologies allow them to reach out to the wider world and share their experiences and viewpoints.

Another clip (#1) that juxtaposes the coalition with its nemesis, Chinada, is added; followed by the communiqué that it’s been condemned (#2) by the partnership for what it seeks to achieve and for already violating domestic and international law and the morality.

For many, the practical assistance and networks [#1: 3:54] of the Commonwealth can give skills, [#2: 3:57] lend advice and encourage

enterprise.

The Sovereign’s statement of principle “The Commonwealth is not an organization with a mission” is timed to begin at exactly the five minute mark of the Christmas Message, and added is a close-up while attending the opening ceremony of the Summit; revealing a coalition identifier, condemnation and Presidential quantum. The clip is also chosen for the 60 Minute Maneuver executed by an attendee immediately behind her.

This amalgam of lexiconic constituents geo-politically underscores that the membership is definitely on a historic mission – one in which the Canadian lawyer and his partners’ have taken an indefatigable stand against – one that

has plagued him for over two decades and which threatens the entire world: namely stealth cognition technologies. In combination with the soon to be seized wealth that drives the militarized global hegemony initiative, it has the ability to efficaciously exploit inherent weaknesses and vulnerabilities in democracy and capitalism.

At the conclusion of the clip the attendee to Her immediate left executes a Zeta-Jones Maneuver; and it’s timed to “It is rather an opportunity for its people to work together to achieve practical solutions to problems. [5:11: Z-J M.]”. In other words, the Summit, like all the other meetings of world

leaders since late 2006 is a forum in which to discuss the ramifications of the Chinada threat, consider mutually beneficial strategic opportunities and arrive at multilateral decisions on how to move toward the attainment of stated objectives. The next series of clips are defined by Her voiceover remark “[The Commonwealth] is, in lots of ways, the face of the future”. The geo-context is built through chosen images: Presidential quantum, China, justice and

Canadian prison and punishment certainty. The communiqué here is that going forward the coalition seeks to deliver justice to victims and ensure there are no more by incarcerating the incorrigibles.

The Sovereign’s commitment to protecting today’s young people from the menacing scourge Chinada represents and them, tomorrow’s adults, from the 21st century’s first global threat is articulated in this image – a coalition identifying 12 children juxtaposed with a photo of Her and His Royal

Highness in their twenties.

There was one other lexiconic addition. The runtime “7:16” comprises a Taylor Identifier and a quantum ratifier.

Angry that there was such resilience to reform as demanded by the coalition,

Her Majesty went on the diplomatic offensive a week before this Christmas

Message aired.

HRH Queen Elizabeth II: Underscores the 'Poverty'

Constituent of Coalition Objective Attainment What are world leaders and the Commonwealth’s Sovereign to do when everything attempted to deliver peace, security and prosperity

fails? The protocol under international law is to exhaust talk first; then try again to the point of failure; then try talk again and again and again and again. With that approach proven to have led to a more serious threat, words are to be replaced with aggressive pre-emptive action, including the 'prison, poverty & perish' approach.

Diplomatic talk and persuasion are clearly not going to change behavior that

violates domestic and international law and modern morality. Consequently, the

coalition is left with no choice but to effect a most aggressive strategy – meeting the 21st century threat with proportional armed force. The methodology of imperialism containment and fixing Canada’s dysfunctionalities is described in the supplementals

The 'poverty' constituent was high profiled by Canada’s Sovereign on December 17, 2009. Herr Royal Highness chose attire (head scarf: Chinada punishment certainty) and took transportation the loyal (not complicit) constituent of Canada’s elite will experience upon regime change. She made sure to embed the lexicon in the day’s adventure, from the cost of the train ticket to the time of arrival. The first combined a coalition identifier with a China identifier; the latter a coalition identifier with enslaving and torturous human experimentation.

Queen lets the train take the strain on way to Sandringham Queen pays £44.40 for off-peak single to take her on Christmas break

by Helen Pidd Guardian.co.uk December 17, 2009

The ‘Daily Mail’ states the following: When the train arrived at King’s Lynn at 12.20 pm sharp, the Queen was met by a Range Rover. […] The Queen does, of course, also have

use of the Royal Train – but that costs taxpayers £57,142 each time it is taken out of its sidings.

‘The Times’ puts it this way:

Although [the train] has been her chosen mode of Christmas travel for a few years now, this was the first year that Buckingham Palace has allowed the press to take a photographic record of the event: perhaps

the Queen is planning to send a copy of the picture to the Prince of Wales and the Duke of York.

No, actually the geo-plan was to depict what life will be like for Canadians who while not complicit in systemic violations of domestic and international law, nonetheless protected the status quo.

The 'angrily-looking-right-at-you-Chinada' expression on Her Majesty’s face encapsulates Her angst over the true nature of Canadian governance in terms of the pain, suffering, injury, loss and death it’s caused and the lack of diplomacy efficacy; and, being cognizant of history both recent and of old, laments what must be done to make things right.

This latest geo-initiative was delivered to the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy through a regular conduit; in this instance the ‘NBC Nightly News’, which included a

short segment on Her geo-trip (Video).

HRH Queen Elizabeth II’s 2010 Christmas Message: “God and My Right Shall Me Defend” Canada Against All Enemies Foreign and Domestic

With Canada’s system of parliamentary government having become so

unconstitutional and in such violation of international law, what would citizens do, what legal mechanism could they rely upon and what resources could they mobilize to challenge those who advance these nefarious policies and practices? They have hijacked political institutions, trillions in embezzled wealth, a monopoly on the use of force and all large private sector organizations in their back pocket. One argument says Queen Elizabeth II lost all Her authority as a result of a series of enactments that cut the Sovereign umbilical cord; that

She is Head of State in name only. Another is that She possesses residual prerogative powers that entitle Her to protect and defend against enemies of the state.

View video

Canada’s most beloved Queen joined the coalition in late December 2006. Since then She and Her Royal Family contributed in multiple ways to addressing the country’s systemic dysfunctionalities and challenging the covertly operating foreign invader. One methodology of participation and engagement of those so adverse to democracy, rule of law and human rights has been to convert Her annual Christmas Message into a geo-platform. 2010 followed that multi-year tradition.

Demonstrating just how knowledgeable and up-to-date She is about coalition events and circumstances is observed in the Message’s two principal geo-themes: addressing the Chinada threat and honoring two-time ‘Partner of the Year’ Taylor Swift

2 – who partners elevated to the pinnacle of supra-celebrity

ever since she proved to be in a class of her own in terms of commitment, creativity and tenacity.

Like in past years meticulous attention was paid to detail in the script to maximize diplomatic efficacy. For example, having ten palaces at Her disposal for filming, She chooses one because its history is replete with what can be geo-politicized.

Hampton Court Palace was England's most significant palace of the Tudor

age. From 1515-c.1521, the Lord Chancellor of England and soon-to-be Cardinal, Thomas Wolsey, transformed a medieval manor (situated 13 miles southwest of London on the north bank of the River Thames) into a palace deemed superlative by contemporary observers. By 1529, [King Henry VIII] had begun a process of rebuilding and remodelling which lasted at least ten years.

2 More on this in Chapter 15: International Honors and ‘The Geo Awards’

The poet John Skelton knew it well and wrote that 'the king's court should have the excellence... But Hampton Court hath pre-eminence!' Skelton offers us a tantalising first-hand glimpse of the magnificence of Wolsey's new palace, for there are no drawings of it and few written records of its

construction remain. What's more, only four years after its initial completion, Henry VIII assumed occupancy. By 1529, the king had begun a process of rebuilding and remodelling which lasted at least ten years. As the Cardinal fell from favour and died, Henry transformed Wolsey's palace beyond recognition. Then William III and Mary II managed to rebuild half of the Tudor palace from 1689-94. Consequently, throughout the almost 500 years since Wolsey's

occupation, it has enjoyed a long history of development which has heavily obscured its original form. Until recently, historians had little idea as to how much of Wolsey's original palace survived amongst Henry VIII's renovations, and so Wolsey's Hampton Court became the missing link of English architectural history. Since the 19th-century, the famous Great Hall, which is the best

surviving room of the Tudor state apartments, has been explained as the last medieval great hall of the English monarchy, one of Henry VIII's upgrades which suited the ultimate magnificence of a royal palace. Source: BBC

Distance from London: Taylor Identifier. Monarch remodeller: China

identifier. Manner of residency: Chinese joint hegemony. Successors: coalition identifier and quantum ratifier. Historical status: true nature of Canadian governance – fiefdom. The 7 minute, 2 second broadcast (quantum ratifier) begins with an orchestral version of ‘God Save the Queen’, during which the lexicon and other geo-relevant symbols, images and communiqués are embedded. A coalition-identifying three seconds in are the colors of Chinada. Five

seconds later there’s a photo of five gargoyles; the closest to the audience a Dragon, representative of China. And three second after that a photo of the Royal time piece set at three o’clock. 16 seconds later the caption identifying the set location. And in 14 [@ 0:30] the Latin inscription reproduced in this supplemental’s title and which articulates Her Majesty’s commitment to defend Canada’s sovereignty with all Her Royal resources.

The Queen’s choice of topics to begin with: describing the genesis of the King James Bible. Choosing the lexiconic color of justice and adorning Her outfit

with a coalition identifier, Her tutorial includes close-up photos of several pages from the original text. At 1:31 (itself a double Taylor Identifier) the East-West corridor audience observes the first paragraph in which there are four numbers which to them are two Taylor Identifiers and two China identifiers. The camera then scrolls down the page and just before the next segment are paragraph numbers 5, 6, 7 and 8 - - comprising quantum ratification and Taylor and China identifiers.

Condemnation for what China’s leaders and complicit Canadians did in Her Dominion is boldly articulated in the next segment. It begins with a young Chinese girl reading from the Bible. What she’s instructed to read is relevant because it creates the opportunity for Her Majesty to articulate standard

diplomatic themes: trepidation over the Chinada threat and the use of antum, i.e., assets seized from malfeasant parties, to engage in reform and accountability. The camera intentionally cuts to the Queen at the words “so afraid”.

1:45: "And lo the angel of the Lord stood before them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them, and they were so afraid." [2:12: clip: Queen: justice, Presidential quantum & quantum]

That’s immediately followed by a children’s choir singing: 12 young boys and girls. And the colors of Chinada are present to generate another child protection themed communiqué.

Canada’s Sovereign then returns to the religious subject, stating of Her family predecessor’s contribution to England’s spiritual heritage [@2:44] “The King James Bible was a major cooperative endeavor that required the efforts of dozens of the day's leading scholars.” Here Her choice of words is

deliberate as the coalition is very much a cooperative undertaking, venture and enterprise involving the most brilliant minds on the planet – capabilities so often argued in the Fiefdom treatise as only a result of democracy and capitalism in combination. The antithesis of these two societal phenomena produces leaders and populations that are intellectually stunted and moral feral.

The second of two Christmas Message topics is ‘sport’; which generates a unique set of opportunities to embed communiqués since athletic competition has parallels with conflict and war. In this segment Her Royal Highness articulates the prison certainty theme and gets diplomatically coercive in the military action category.

3:30: "I've seen for myself how important sport is in bringing together people from all backgrounds and all walks of life [2:26: Diaz M.] and

from all age groups [Diaz M.]. [...] 4:09: "Apart from developing physical fitness sport and games can also teach vital social skills [clip: 4:14: China identifier, quantum ratifier, coalition identifier].

None can be enjoyed without biding by the rules. And no team can hope to succeed without [60 MM] cooperation between the players [q-Soledad M.]. This sort of positive team spirit can benefit communities, companies and enterprises of all kinds.

As successes in recent Olympics bear witness a love of sport also has the power to help rehabilitate. One only has to think of the injured [4:46: five disabled soldiers] men and women of the Armed Forces to see how an interest in games [soldier: British Parlia M.] and sport can speed recovery [prison certainty] and renew a sense of purpose, enjoyment and comradeship."

Sportsmen and women often speak of the enormous pride they have in

representing their country [5:26: China identifier, Taylor Identifier, quantum ratifier, prison certainty, quantum]; a sense of belonging to a wider family.”

The last segment returns to the religious dimension of Her Message. Here [@ 5:53 – Taylor Identifier] the Canada, justice and quantum constituents of the lexicon are embedded in the script.

There’s the Nativity scene; and a close-up of the three wise men is timed to the famous jurisprudential adage in Matthew 7:12 -- which has been adopted

by the coalition in holding to account those who think they are perpetually invincible, insulated and immune:

"Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them.”

The conclusion is just as geo-politicized as the beginning. The lexicon is employed to red flag wishing Her Canadian subjects and all coalition

partners, the best during this holiday time and in the new year:

I wish you and all those whom you love and care for a very happy Christmas" [6:36: choirmaster: dbl-h O-S M.]

[a quantum ratifying five angels]

There is a series of archive entries on the geo-politicization of America’s

Veterans’ Day, Britain’s Armistice Day and Canada’s Remembrance Day;

because the nature of the conflict and all the coercive diplomacy sought to

impress upon the incorrigibles a historic global confrontation was occurring;

and there would be covert military action if there was no capitulation.

Consequently, the ceremonies and events on November 11th each year were

in one way, shape or form turned into opportunities to continue delivering

that that message.

My contribution was attending at the Vancouver cenotaph and wandering

through the always large crowd because many of them were security

apparatus operatives who had embraced the militant culture of their secret

organization. They saw themselves as members of nationwide family that

had married Beijing’s military and intelligence communities; and millions of

them worked collaboratively to protect the status quo. Given this

circumstance, the diplomacy archives labels these low-level operatives

“street soldiers”.

Canada’s Sovereign embedded the numbers constituent of the lexicon in

cleverly fashioned breast pins made of poppies - this instance in 2008 to

ratify quantum...

… and the year before choreographed another contribution to acknowledge

Her coalition membership and put on the diplomatic record that She agrees

with the partnership’s determination to ensure my damages would be

forthcoming.

When attending in 2009 at Vancouver’s cenotaph I took the exact same

routine as in years past. With the war monument at the bottom of a

moderate incline, I walked into the large crowd from the top and then

zigzagged my way to where soldiers and other public service officials and

employees were standing in formation at street level. Every twenty to thirty

seconds or so I stopped and looked up the hill observing the rows of

Canadians. And every time I did at least one street soldier employed that

pubescent ‘establishment’ protecting stalk, swarm, surround and sabotage

hand gesturing technique.

....^ ....

After I reached street level (^) I then walked around the event’s designated

area, passing behind a triple row of Asian teenager recruits and in front of

hundreds more attendees on the sidewalk north of the monument. I

traversed this area three times – and on each occasion aggressively

scanned the faces of the complicit and loyal and observed a range of

expressions: head-dropping and eyes-shifting guilt, fear and intimidation

knowing that the forces amassed against them are unchallengeable and

because the Triple “P” approach to objective attainment (prison, poverty and

perish) is certain. So witnessing that that trademark bellicose attitude was

another reminder of the work cut out for the coalition in fixing that which ails

Canada.

The Chinada complicit maneuvered a veteran in his sixties into my path –

stationed where they knew I’d plant myself to watch the event - as I had

done every year previous. Until departing the uniformed officer appeared

deferent. When walking past him a fourth time, this time with the intention

of leaving, he executed an embellished nose wipe. The name on his ID tag:

“Hollywood”. This was obviously intended to send a message to that

constituent of the coalition membership that nothing it or the rest of the

partnership does is going to deter the Chinada High Command from pursuing

its goals of maintaining the authoritarian status quo and continuing to push

the R&D envelope of stealth cognition technologies and engage in torture

with what was created.

Other members of the Royal Household joined the coalition. Her son, HRH

Prince Charles, proved membership when helping to script and choreograph

a lengthy 2008 documentary on his life.

HRH Prince Charles: Geo-Politicizes Documentary to Advance

Coalition Interests and Objectives

On May 17, 2009 the two-hour documentary on the Prince of Wales was broadcast on CBC. It originally aired in the United Kingdom on November 12, 2008.

The fact His Royal Highness employed the coalition’s lexicon repeatedly to generate multitudinous communiqués and instructed the producer to edit film footage in a manner that created more of a

testament to the Monarch’s coalition membership.

Charles: The Passionate Prince Sunday May 17, 2009 at 10 pm ET/PT on CBC Newsworld cbc.ca

"Eventually people might realize that some of the things

I've been trying to do aren't all that mad"

Prince Charles He has reached the age at which most people retire. Yet at age 60, Prince Charles is still waiting to undertake the role for which he was born and is now the longest-serving monarch-in-waiting in British history. For a year the BBC television documentary Charles: The

Passionate Prince was granted unprecedented access and allowed to film the Prince of Wales at home, abroad, at work and on duty. The result is an intimate portrait of the private and passionate man behind the controversy and the headlines, offering insight into some of the issues close to his heart. He could, as he said in the documentary have sat back and done very

little other than enjoy the immense privileges and almost unlimited pleasures to which a Prince of Wales is privy. But Prince Charles has

defied convention to become, and at age 60 has become one of Britain's most outspoken and prolific campaigners, as well as being a businessman, ambassador for Britain and a father.

He is asked in the documentary whether, as King, he would still "champion big themes". Charles answered: "I don't know. I don't know - probably not in the same way. But I like to think perhaps that after all this, eventually people might realize that some of the things I've been trying to do aren't all that mad and that I might have some 'convening power' that could be put to use." This revealing film goes behind the closed doors of the Prince's world and gives us the chance to make up our own minds about the man who may one day be king.

Produced for the BBC, Nick Vaughan-Barratt is the programme's executive producer.

View video

The lexicon is quickly employed – setting the geo-political tone of the documentary. During the preview segment of the lengthy documentary there are clips which generate communiqués. To “If you want a quieter life, lock me up” – “don’t let me go anywhere or see anything”, he executes a Clooney Maneuver [@ 0:26]; underscoring (i) that imprisonment is an inevitability for Canada’s malfeasant and (ii) he empathizes with the Canadian lawyer who was prevented from having a normal life because of his lab monkey status. That’s followed immediately with

“somebody’s got to say these things”. In executing a Zeta-Jones Maneuver His Royal Highness is stating on the diplomatic record that he and his Royal Family are taking the initiative to help achieve coalition objectives. That point is supplemented when the narrator’s voiceover is timed to the Prince’s Clooney Maneuver:

[1:35: Newman M.] For a year our cameras observed him behind the scenes in [1:39: Cl.M. X2] duty and at home.

Additionally, the colors of Chinada punishment certainty and Presidential quantum are choreographed in one of his studies, timed to the voiceover remark “We can see for ourselves [1:54: clip: Chinada p.c.] the man behind the headlines and the controversy; the Prince with a burning passion to make a difference” – a clever way of articulating that everyone in the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy, both who flaunted domestic and international law and who are being encouraged to

participate in reform, accountability and demilitarization, can witness his aggressive contributions over the years and now and take stock of the Canadian lawyer’s coalition-arranged wealth that seeks to make right what went so terribly wrong for decades. At “The Prince of Wales has recruited stars for thirty years” is a clip of Hollywood superstar and coalition partner Gwyneth Paltrow on the red carpet for an event celebrating ‘The Prince’s Trust’. She executes a Diaz Maneuver [@ 2:28] in the

Prince’s presence. In addition to displaying the synergistic dynamics of the

coalition this is HRH’s way of confirming he’s been actively seeking to add coalition members since his Family became involved in 2006. The Prince describes the coalition in Britain as a national institution – producers

timing the voiceover to that effect about one of his charities, the Prince’s Trust. It’s timed to a clip of an audience member executing an Anderson Maneuver [@ 3:00]. During this event Hollywood superstar Kevin Spacey takes the stage and makes the audience laugh. He embraces one of the hostesses and mimics kissing her. The camera cuts to the Prince who executes a double Rumsfeld Maneuver [@ 4:14] to draw attention to the isolation-deprivation theme.

During the first of many sit-down interview clips, the Prince again refers to the imminence of imprisonment:

That's what a lot of people never seem to understand or realized; that I was, you know, [7:07: Branson M.] sent off to do all these so-called 'ordinary things'.

Footage of him attending a function relevant to his many philanthropic organizations included a clip of an attendee executing a Clooney Maneuver timed as follows to draw attention to the Canadian lawyer’s twenty years as an enslaved and tortured human experimentation victim:

He's [7:57: Cl.M.] gone on to set up more than twenty organizations, known collectively as 'The Prince's Charities'.

Another one was inserted at this point to underscore what was then being considered, my role on some kind of Custodian-in-Council:

They accounted for many of the 609 official engagements he carried out last year. As it turned out, they also [8:09: Cl.M.] allow him a much greater say on public policy.

He again underscored the inescapability of prison, this time during a conversation with two attendees in which he joked about a request to attend charity related functions:

I wish I could go. [8:58: Pacino M.] I keep trying. They won't let me go. Widespread coalition membership and synergy, i.e., initiating communiqués with another partner when the topic has geo-political relevance, is observed during

another conversation at this function. When he makes the following observation his interlocutor immediately executes three lexiconic gestures in a row to drive home what the coalition thinks of its nemeses:

I showed [X] his portrait. Of course, he hates it. [9:13: Z-J M.; Beckinsale-Clinton M.; protracted Pfeiffer-Brooke M.]

During a boardroom meeting more coalition-relevant editing is employed to generate communiqués; this time rhetorically asking the question whether the coalition is going to be successful in deconstructing and reconstituting Canada and containing and neutralizing China’s ideological imperialism:

We want to make a difference on the ground. How do we do it? Now, the problem is who do they go to. I am told there are endless consultants. But are they all actually at the end of the day effective [10:34: clip: two attendees: 2 Prince Harry M.s]. Should we be thinking of being a more effective [clip: attendee: Prince Harry M.] delivery organization with a kind of resident experts?

Added is confirmation that the Royal Family is trying to be ‘a most effective’ diplomacy medium through which the coalition articulates its concerns, fears, intents and information on its tactics to achieve stated objectives. Moments later a clip of him entering the lobby of a building and being greeted by a delegation was turned into an acknowledgment of the critical emergency that is the Chinada threat:

The Prince again took the lead at what he called his ‘Business May Day Summit’ [10:47: Cl.M.] on climate change.

When delivering a speech to the climate change audience, he employed the lexicon named after one of his sons to highlight in very mild terms what the threat consists of:

I'm no longer at risk of being a blinding nuisance. I am a blinding nuisance [10:09: Prince Harry M.].

Attention was given to the kinds of large and multi-national corporations who became coalition partners:

[11:34: audience: Erin M.] The heads of BP, Sainsbury's, IBM, Royal

Mail and Unileaver - to pluck a few brand names - were challenged to spell out their record on carbon emissions.

Widespread coalition membership and its trademark synergy was again in evidence during the last sequence of clips from this summit. An audience member, an executive of one of those large companies, contributed to what has been non-stop appreciation accorded the Canadian lawyer for his work and acknowledging his

hypno-beleaguered life:

Well done. [12:30: Cl.M., Federer M.] The summit was attended by Prime Minister Gordon Brown. As they walked through the lobby the Prince executed a Stewart-Terminator Maneuver [@ 12:51], timed to

It now gives me the greatest possible pleasure... …which is his way of indicating how much he enjoys working closely with the country’s government to ensure Canada’s dysfunctionalities are fixed and China’s

posture is efficaciously addressed. The Prime Minister was clearly ad idem with His Royal Highness on geo-politicizing his speech to a group of corporate executives, many who’d become coalition partners:

We are privileged to have been invited by the Prince of Wales to address this conference today; because there is no one who has done

more throughout our country and indeed throughout the world to stimulate action on sustainability [13:26: Bl.M.] by both businesses and by the public sector. We are deeply in your debt.

Britain’s largest corporations are heeding the ‘May Day’ call and are committed partners in achieving stated objectives.

An attendee is interviewed about the Prince’s philanthropy methodology. The producer inserted a clip to draw a parallel with how HRH engages coalition business and supervises the Canadian lawyer’s contributions and activities on behalf of partners:

... and pretty [15:26: Cl.M.] voraciously followed up as to whether you've actually done anything. This is how the Prince of Wales does

business with his charities.

A short segment on a Royal visit to the West Indies proved another staging ground for back-channel diplomacy, this time describing his tenacious resolve and the reaction of malfeasant (i) to the ubiquitous condemnation generation of partners and (ii) when they’re arrested.

Voiceover: His chartered yacht was the perfect place to invite local

business leaders. He never wastes a chance to spread his gospel.

Prince: You wouldn't believe the screaming and shouting [17:11:

attendee: quasi-Cl.M.] the gnashing of teeth; you can't believe it.

[…]

I managed to get hold of the insurance sector; asked them to lunch; and said 'look, you're the people, I think for what it's worth, who are going to stand to lose a hell of a lot if all goes seriously wrong'.

Do you remember everybody was talking about the triumph of capitalism over communism. And I thought, hang on a minute, this is crazy [17:33: Cl.M.]; because if somebody doesn't bother about the social dimension

we're all scattered. And it'll come 'round again to communism. So I thought the only way to deal with this is to encourage business to take a more responsible approach.

The producer inserted a protracted clip of a West Indies law enforcement officer brandishing an automatic weapon (at the asterisk). That was followed by the Prince executing a Clooney Maneuver to make the point that if diplomacy fails lethal

military force will be employed; because authoritarianism in the form now being advanced by the China-Canada alliance is intolerable and everything that can be done will be done to prevent its spread. During a reception for military personnel a clip of an attendee executing a Clooney Maneuver was inserted [@ 19:36] to the voiceover remark “the RAF anniversary … was a family occasion”; underscoring the fact that everyone in the Queen’s

immediate and in some cases extended Royal Family are coalition partners and aggressively pursuing what is best for a peaceful, secure and prosperous world. Later, the setting was an after dinner exchange with an Officer of the RAF that had just been awarded his wings – hearing in the topic of conversation an opportunity to geo-politicize the moment and drawing a comparison between the war in the Middle East and the war against Chinada:

Prince: I do hope you'll get a rest now. Officer: No Sir, I'm going to Iraq in a month’s time. Prince: [22:03: Prince Harry - Erin M.] On what? Officer: We're going to be watch-keepers in Bajara.

During another segment of the sit-down interview His Royal Highness drew attention to the fact that he suggested his two sons become geo-politically active:

Interviewer: Did you suggest the idea originally that Prince Harry and Prince William to...

Prince: ...Yes [22:35: Z-J M.]; of course. When I was their age I

wanted to; but it was encouraged anyway.

The foregoing is only a half hour of the documentary’s two-hour running

time. The YouTube video of it all no longer is on the server, and thus the

remaining part of the transcript reproduced infra doesn’t have time stamps

of lexiconic usage.

When recounting his teenage years and opportunities to serve in the military the Prince said this and producers inserted a clip of a photo-op and an Officer

employing the lexicon to generate the communiqué that achieving stated objectives had already been planned by coalition leaders:

And, of course you know, Lord Mountbatten, my great uncle, was mad-keen more about the navy than my father. [3:14: Letterman M.] Things were mapped out.

At a military medal awarding ceremony the (i) camera is pointed towards the Prince’s feet – him taking a step forward to bring a white stripe on a red carpet into view: Canada prison certainty; and right after an usher is choreographed to employ the lexicon in a way that draws attention to the fact the Canadian lawyer was awarded Britain’s Military Cross

3:

Prince: I can never get over the way [members of the armed forces] react in this totally selfless way.

Announcer: For services in Iraq – the Military

Cross [3:52: Prince Harry M. X3; Colbert M.; Anderson M.] to be

decorated Lieutenant [X].

It is granted “in recognition of "an act or acts of exemplary gallantry during active operations against the enemy”. It is the ‘third’ in the ranking of military honors.

However in this context it symbolically refers to the coalition (third). Next was HRH’s express acknowledgement that this documentary was filmed to assist the coalition. The voiceover states:

He was busy next door [6:54: Rumsfeld M.] recording video messages for events he couldn't attend.

3 This high honor constituted one of several publicly non-transparent awards and accolades

I received throughout the years. More on this topic in Chapter 15: International Honors and ‘The Geo Awards’

As filming was underway helicopters were heard flying outside – interrupting the Prince’s concentration. At one point, HRH created a geo-political double entendre:

Drives you mad [8:04: Erin M.] I wish somebody would find out how

is it possible [Erin M.] they're doing it today. I don't follow. He’s referring to the frustration he and coalition partners experience observing diplomacy being inefficacious. His charities and other commitments were high profiled again, and one more time they were platforms from which to fire diplomatic salvos – on this occasion articulating how the causes he gets involved in where he becomes facilitator usually

succeed at achieving objectives: Thousands of people every year receive a personal invitation from the Prince of Wales. Most of them [2:42: attendee: Gutierrez M.; prison certainty, justice] naturally succumb to his pulling power, but they soon find there is no such thing as a free lunch.

He condemns Chinada principals for the ‘Nazi’ constituent of Canadian governace addressing a conference of Welsh businessmen and tells the malfeasant in no uncertain terms they’ll believe the coalition’s resolve to achieve stated objectives when they see handcuffs and shackles going on, their assets being seized and employment termination notices followed by being blacklisted from future job opportunities:

'Seeing is believing' [cites catch-phrase in various languages] The problem is nobody's ever worked out a Welsh form of words, you see. 'Seeing is believing' [3:16: attendee: Erin M.]. unlike in France where I think it is 'voyean et craeyon'. Ah, I dread to think what it is in Germany [Pfeiffer M.] Achtung, perhaps.

When attendees are having tea and conversation after the conference, producers insert more clips; this time articulating there’s so much psychopathological

dysfunctionality in Canadian governance and that “several of his [organizations] are focused on the issue [of reform, accountability and demilitarization]”.

The Prince himself had plenty to [3:52: attendee #1: Kernan, Clooney, Prince Harry M.] report on inner city dereliction. Several of his [attendee #2: Prince Harry M.; Gutierrez M.] charities are focused on the issue.

At another conference in which he was being asked for assistance from his charitable organizations he highlighted what the Fiefdom treatise maintains is a mental deficiency in Canadian political and corporate leaders. He geo-politicized a recommendation thusly:

It will also help I think in terms of the health problems [6:18: SNL M.]

Coalition synergy was in evidence right after this remark, with an attendee to his immediate left executing a Preston Maneuver to “suddenly brought to life again”. In rapid fire succession there was another instance of clever editing. Voiceover was

added to a short scene of a street crowd that had gathered for his drive-by and filmed by the camera in the Prince’s vehicle. A woman is observed brushing her fingers through her hair and the producer turned that into a Diaz Maneuver and coalition identifier when the triple gesture was timed to “The Prince had his eye on the old cotton mill district called the Weaver’s Triangle” – confirming how much the Royal Family has been monitoring events in the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy since first becoming coalition partners and acknowledging the Fiefdom treatise phraseology of the Ottawa-Toronto-Montreal triangle of power and wealth; the

source of most everything that’s gone wrong with Canada. That’s immediately followed by:

It give you the opportunity to see what the Weaver's Triangle is like [6:59: clip: barge operator: Canadian prison certainty]. I came here over twenty years ago and I remember looking at it then and feeling what a terrible waste it was.

HRH’s tour guide was choreographed to gesture an Execution Maneuver immediately after this reflective voiceover by the Prince; while behind him another member of the entourage executes a Federer Maneuver. Moments later the shifting of a city official’s hand is turned into a lexiconically recognized gesture – one that becomes the red flag of coalition relevance drawing

attention again to the neglected nature of Canadian democracy; followed by an assurance that the coalition has a detailed and well thought out strategy to deliver a new paradigm of governance.

Sadly, after twenty years [the buildings are] still pretty derelict [7:25: organizer: Couric-Wolf M.]. But I hope there will be a way of looking at more integrated plan [Erin M.].

That was corroborated by the next clip – of a member of his entourage executing a Federer Maneuver, then in post-production timed to “[7:39] Next on his regeneration tour…”. His Royal Highness stresses how coalition partners has gone to some length to educated the Canadian lawyer for the role planned for him several years ago, executing a British Parliamentary Maneuver to “... helps to train them and develop

their technical [8:03: British Parlia. M.] skills and potential”. As he sits with his colleagues and guests on the Royal train going to the next day’s engagement, his lexiconic gesture is timed to the scripted voiceover to underscore his having partnered with members of the coalition to advance its interests and objectives.

Nine months later seven [9:08: Paulson M.] of the Prince's charities are working in partnership with the Council and five staff are based in [the City] full time.

At his next engagement, sitting with politicians and interested parties, he queries rhetorically "in other words what [1:25: Gutierrez M.] are the barriers, an obstacle; little tweaks can make [the difference] [SNL M.]”. He’s referring to Canada’s political and corporate leaders and the Chinese who stand in the way of allowing democracy to fully develop in the country; and indicating it won’t take much to get them out of the way to procure for reform, accountability and demilitarization. When one of his interlocutors argues the phrase ‘the pub is a hub’ isn’t sexy enough

and then jokes she wasn’t saying the Prince wasn’t sexy, he retorts in good humor “Get that one in quickly; your life won't be worth living”. Adding two Rumsfeld Maneuvers and a Clooney Maneuver [@ 2:02 & 2:05 respectively] articulated that what’s in store for the holdouts to democratization and demilitarization will be so exceptionally painful they’ll prefer being dead. His next point was that while he distances himself from delving in matters of

government policy or executive decision-making, he was compelled by the historical and exigent nature of the Chinada threat to become fully immersed in these matters:

[Attendees could] weigh in on policy, unlike the Prince. Every now and then though, the Price couldn't help himself [3:17: Branson M.]

[…] Nobody will listen to you unless you combine [3:58: Anderson M.] because they can't ignore three hundred farmers coming at them; or you know, or three hundred of five hundred tourist operators. [Cl.M.] They’ll pick you off one by…

He then makes the point that underpinned President Bush’s coalition-building policy

– adding a lexiconic constituent, two coalition identifiers and a compensation ratifier for good measure. And immediately thereafter becomes exceptionally coercive – threatening to use selective lethal force to get rid of those who continue to maintain Chinada’s military posture. The Dalai Lama, a coalition partner since October ’07, was invited to contribute to the Prince’s documentary – executing a combination Clooney-Newman Maneuver

when filmed together [@ 2:59]. His Royal Highness adds in a voiceover “Thank God he’s there, literally” – a geo-political statement about how much coalition partners are appreciative to the Canadian lawyer for spearheading their interests and objectives, since without him there would be nobody in Canada and it would continue down its international law violating path.

The Prince heard in his guest’s comments what could be turned into his views on coalition participation – a “just cause”.

Thank-you very much. You always show concern and indication or

expression of solidarity with just cause, thank-you. [Prince: 3:56: Rumsfeld M.]

The documentary then turned to HRH attending a conference hosted by the European Commission in Brussels. He wanted to show Canada’s political and corporate leaders, the Chinese and Fiefdom treatise recipients himself networking with other coalition partners to address the Chinada threat.

In the European Commission's conference room he introduced his team [8:12: Cl.M.] to the Commission president, Jose Manuel Barroso [Soledad M. X2]. This was lobbying on a grand scale.

The EU President became a coalition partner in late April ’07

4.

[The Prince was] [8:21: attendee #1: Prince Harry M.] much more

Chief Executive than heir to the throne [attendee #2: Erin M.; attendee #3: Federer M.]

The Prince articulated in a voiceover as film aired of him at his desk what his geo-political role in part has been and will continue to be:

Prince: [1:26: Cl.M.] What I try to do is bring people together.

And [Cl.M.] then to part and let them get on with it. Most of the time you don't realize I've done the original asking them to lunch or dinner or something.

Narrator: The Prince has a phrase for this: he calls this "convening

power". On a walkabout with politicians and other interested parties at one of his residential

building projects that integrated different economic strata in one place, he saw an opportunity to corroborate the coalition’s intention of elevating the Canadian lawyer to the office of Custodian-in-Council Chief Executive – which clearly has been in the works since the transfer of sovereign authority.

Prince: Did you come at all years ago?

Politician: I came just before I was leader. Prince: Yea [2:59: Russell M.; Leno M.; Dayna M.]

The Prince becomes impassioned during a one-on-one with the show’s interviewer about what is conceptually off about urban designs and corporate activity that

4 See Appendix 11

affects man’s relationship with nature. At the same time, with his mind so focused on geo-politicizing his documentary, he sees a Churchillian linkage in the topic and also the kinds of thinking that is leading Chinada malfeasant to the brink of personal destruction:

The heart has educated out the intuitive element; and only concentrate on the rational. That's crazy, I think. Look at the problem it's caused. Because at the end of the day that [6:15: Cl.M.] emphasis is only on the rational has actually led to the testing of the world to destruction. Because the empirical outlook can only lead to a situation where you test the world to destruction; and you only get the evidence you've destroyed it by the time you've destroyed it. What's

the point of having any evidence then? How do you put it back together again? That's what I've been trying to explain to people all these years. It's crazy. It's balance, that's all. Just to reintegrate the lost elements we need in order to look after this planet.

He again took his commitment to coalition interests and objectives on the international road. While in the Caribbean and touring an area that he targeted for renewal, he stated the following – more proof of how resolved he is like all partners to deal with the exigencies of the era:

It's been a long struggle. I've had to send people backwards and forwards; [8:11: Federer M.; Erin M.] and not give up.

[…] After I’d spoken about [8:18: British Parlia. M.] Rosetown and the problems here to some large dinner I think in London. And I just happened to mention this - and this chap came up to me afterwards and said "I'd like to help".

The segment began with the Prince in one of his gardens drawing a parallel between how he’d created the landscape and how he helped plant the seeds of democracy, rule of law and human rights in Canada; adding that before that process Canadian governance was completely devoid of these principles:

I planted these [0:13: Branson M.] [trees] when I first came; so [protracted Cl.M.] they've done quite well. 'Cause it was very empty.

The next sequence of film clips is the only time in the entire two-hour documentary that Her Majesty makes an appearance. In them is the awarding of another Royal honor to the Canadian lawyer:

One of the few formal occasions in the year when the Queen is accompanied by [1:22: Prince Philip: Brown M.] most of the Royal

Family is the ancient gathering of the Knights of the Garter [1:26: Queen: SNL M.] at Windsor Castle. [...]

My Mama's provided this remarkable degree of continuity; which matters a great deal. In an age with is so full of constant change one way or the other, it's quite useful to have something you can [2:19: Eastwood M.], as it were, hang on to. […]

The Order dates from 1348 and this year it clocked up its one thousandth Knight - Prince William. Even [2:48: crowd attendee: Cl.M.] in the 21st century it's a royal right of passage.

Translated, he’s stating that during what has been a most tumultuous time in the Canadian lawyer’s life, he has been afforded the emancipatory confidence that his commitment, work and sacrifice is not going unnoticed or un-rewarded. During another segment of the sit-down interview HRH is asked a question that makes him laugh:

Interviewer: What would be your one overriding piece of advice to your successor as the Prince of Wales?

Prince: [chuckles] God. Well, I need notice of that question

[3:13: Cl.M. X3]. The most important thing is to listen to advice; which you can decide whether to take or not.

Like so much of the foregoing documentary, he observes a geo-political relevance and exploits it; this time giving what the Canadian lawyer’s information dissemination initiative in part sought to achieve: notice of the coalition’s concerns and fears, what its objectives are and what tactics are to be employed to achieve

those stated goals. The documentary returns to his endeavors to help British citizens in whatever way he can. During a meeting with Welsh farmers where the discussion is about environmentally friendly practices, he states…

There's nothing you practically have to do really extra, is there [6:37: Erin M.]?

… to underscore that there are many things extra that have to be done to achieve benchmark results and ultimately reach stated goals – in this case continue to geo-politicize the film that’s makes everyone in the ‘East” section of East-West Corridor and Fiefdom treatise recipients appreciate how tenaciously resolved everyone in the coalition is. When a farmer impresses upon his Royal guest that “with the growth of the grass in

the summer on the open hill it's feast and famine”, the geo-opportunist turns the observation into a parallel [@ 7:09: protracted quasi-Federer M.; Gates M.] for Canada’s malfeasant who didn’t violate The Security of Information Act and other legislation sufficiently to land themselves in prison. The Prince of Wales high profiled the fact that the Royal Family operates in a most unique and extraordinary environment for coalition partners to discuss, debate,

plan and reaffirm their commitment:

When it comes to networking [0:49: Cl.M.] nowhere beats Buckingham Palace. The Clooney Maneuver was choreographed to be executed by a patron of the arts, who was mixing with colleagues and associates in conjunction with a Command Performance. After the main event the Prince is talking with another invitee, who executes the lexicon to the phrase “plants that seed that you never forget”

[@10:06] when referring to his mother providing him with lessons when a child. The same is true on the global plane of international relations with respect to the principals, values and beliefs of democracy, rule of law and the basic dignity of the individual – all of which are virtually lacking institutionally in Canada and are completely absent in Chinese government. At a gathering of one of his charitable entities he jokes to them but is profoundly

serious in the communiqués he generates. This was first inserted during the documentary preview (see supra):

As you know by now I hope that my problems - and I can't resist trying to find a way of doing something about it - many of the problems I come across. If you want a quieter life, lock me up [laughter]. Don't let me go anywhere or [5:55: Cl.M.] see anything

[attendee: Paulson M.]. By the time I'm dead we might have a really powerful organization.

(1) The malfeasant are going to prison and only then will Canada’s governing

structure not be a burden and which procures pain, injury, suffering, loss and death; and which will have an efficacy that helps citizens; and (2) he high profiles what it’s been like being an enslaved human experimentation subject, where life is micro-managed and where finances are pro-actively deprived so there is no mobility – no opportunity to travel and experience the world and its wonders. The interviewer asks what HRH sees for himself over the next twenty years. He reflects on the next chapter of his life and concomitantly what retrospectively he’ll

have accomplished geo-politically: I'll probably be in my eighties before I see the real culmination of all the things I've been trying to do [6:34: Bl.M.s]. It takes all much longer than you think.

He suggests how one must proceed when embroiled in historic events and

circumstances:

[6:58: Branson M.] A king has to be above the battle. In other words, those at the pinnacle of power and influence must be and remain engaged until the war against Chinada is triumphantly successful.

Finally, he says of his longevity as a coalition partner: Interviewer: [Looking many years ahead] will you be able to go on

championing big themes?. Prince: I don't know. I don't know. Probably not the same

way. But I like to think perhaps after all this, you know, people might eventually realize that some of the things

I've been trying to do are not all that made; and that I might still have [7:53: Z-J M.] some convening power that could be put to use.

Closing Observations It became apparent quickly that in virtually every public forum in which he appeared and was filmed for this documentary he was attired in prison certainty.

This was a conscious effort to underscore that the transgressions of domestic and international law and morality are so egregious that the only just resolution includes imprisonment for life or lengthy periods. The thanks of thirty million Canadians and billions of people who’ll never know and the entire coalition membership goes to His Royal Highness and, inter alia, the following whose contributions were indispensable:

Executive Producer: Nick Vaughan-Barratt Narrator: Robert Hardman Film Editor: Samuel Santana

Both of his children became valuable partners of the global coalition, but at

different times. As already documented in Chapter 5, HRH Prince Harry was

the first Royal to step into the diplomatic back-channel and at the same time

as Aaron Sorkin, thus being the Commonwealth parallel to the contributions

made by ‘The West Wing’ in early January 2004.

The two Princes were interviewed together, once in 2006 and again in 2007.

The former was broadcast at the end of May 2006 when the lexicon was just

starting to explode, and conducted by two U.K. blocs -- well known English

comedy and TV presenting duo who clearly had the inside track on all things

coalition during those early days (video). They peppered the two Royals and

their father, who was in attendance, with the lexicon; so much so that

eventually the three of them concluded they were in safe company and

relaxed to the point where they felt comfortable using this new language

repeatedly.

When one of the interviewers employs a geo-gesture for the first time and

most assertively [@ 0:30] all three heads go down, which is revelatory of

the exclusivity of membership back then. Obviously, they were blindsided

by this display of knowledge. He does it again [@ 0:59] to demonstrate this

was going to be a geo-political event. Then both visually tag-team their

guests, employing geo-gestures simultaneously [@ 4:27]. The prompting

pays off when [@ 4:54] Prince Charles reciprocates with a Clooney M..

While each use of the confidential language sought to red flag issues related

to the coalition's mission, HRH's Clooney M. [@ 6:65] has a distinctly

Churchillian sentiment; timed to "I finally woke up" when speaking about a

medical emergency he experienced.

A 2007 interview for NBC demonstrated not only a commitment to coalition

interests and objectives, but also the younger Prince showed again that

having a geo-gesture named after oneself was a coveted matter.

HRH Princes William and Harry: Acknowledging the Canadian Lawyer’s Supra-Celebrity Status, Confirming the Coalition’s

Massive and Unstoppable, It’s Futile to Fight and High Profiling the 21st Century Pandora’s Box

The last week of June 2007 began with a critically important geo-politicized interview hosted by NBC’s Matt Lauer involving Her Majesty the Queen’s two grandsons: HRH Prince William, the next King of England, and his brother HRH Prince Harry, who succeeds him. The upshot of the event was irrefutable confirmation how knowledgeable and involved the House of Windsor is within the coalition to protect its vast interests and achieve its historic objectives.

Matt Lauer: [clip: P. Harry Cl.M.] In 2005, he landed on the front

page once again when he showed up at a costume party in a Nazi uniform*, an embarrassing incident [clip: P. Harry: protracted Letterman M.] for which he issued a formal apology.

Prince William: … [My brother’s had] his fair share of hard time by

the media. And at the end of the day, no matter what you think, the only person you're ever going to

get to know to be able to form that opinion is him. No matter what you read or what you see, you're never going to know someone unless you actually get to meet them and talk to them properly. That's what I say about everyone.

Prince Harry: That's actually the most amusing point is meeting

somebody and them going, "You're so not what I thought you were." And to both of us on to, you know, to our father, to everybody. You're not what I thought you were, and, "Well, what did you think?" "Oh, [protracted Cl.M.] I best not say it to your face," like this. Well, thanks a lot.

[…] Matt Lauer: If you look at a Madonna or you look at a Michael

Jordan -- incredibly famous at a certain period of

their lives [Prince Harry M.].

[…] Matt Lauer: [return from commercial] [protracted Maria M.]

Welcome back to our conversation with Britain’s Royal brothers, Princes William and Harry. [end] They’ve been speaking about their mother – the love

she gave them, the lessons she taught them and the [Maria M.] loss they felt so acutely at the time of her death ten years ago. But what about their lives now? Both found themselves in the headlines lately. William – for the break-up with his long-time girlfriend Kate Middleton. And Harry – for his possible deployment to Iraq. [end]

[…]

Matt Lauer: But you can tell [inauthentic people] right off the

bat, can't you? Prince William: You can, yeah. Although some of them are [quasi-

Cl.M.]…

[…] Matt Lauer: But if you read something that's not true about a

personal relationship, do you ever want to get up on the highest point in London or in England and scream out, "Hey guys, you're wrong. Here's what

really happened"? Prince William: Possibly. But then you come down, you get to their

level. You don't want to do that. Matt Lauer: [quasi-Prince Harry M.] You play into that?

Prince William: … Just let them write what you want to write because at the end of the day, you can't stop it. And, you know, there's no point in fighting it [Prince Harry Pfeiffer M.; Prince William Pacino M.; Prince Harry protracted Z-J & Erin M.; Prince William: quasi-Bl.M.]

[…] Prince Harry: The closer it gets, the more I sort of think about it.

And you know, it's so hard to talk about it. There's a

lot that I can think about in my head that I can't actually sort of express [Cl.M.].

Matt Lauer: [voiceover] Three weeks after our interview, the

Ministry of Defense decided the risk was just too great. Harry will not deploy to Iraq, although there's speculation he might be sent to Afghanistan. If any war zone proves too risky for Harry, you can be sure

that 24-year-old William, the future king, won't be going either. It's a fact William seems reluctant to accept. [clip: Matt: Prince Harry M.]

[…]

Matt Lauer: And you've been to the United States. You spent a

little time in Tennessee. You mentioned Disney World. What are your impressions of the US?

[…]

Prince Harry: I think it's such an amazing place. It's so vast and

on such a massive scale [Branson M.] and there's so

much to do, and it's so different. Prince William: I love America. I think it's brilliant. I have a really

good time when I'm over there. Everyone's really friendly, welcoming. They’re very good at sort of not being too invasive [clip: Matt: quasi-Cl.M.; Prince Harry: protracted Preston M.].

[…] Matt Lauer: [protracted Branson M.] We've talked a lot about the

weight of your responsibilities and your role in this society. What's the coolest thing about being a prince?

[…] Prince William: Yeah. No, I think we're very lucky [Prince Harry M.].

You know, we have lots of things that we are very fortunate to have.

[…]

Matt Lauer: [Prince Harry: protracted Cl.M.] So the concert -- you guys have been extraordinarily involved in it every aspect. This isn't a case of the two sons signing off on it [end] at the last minute.

[…]

Prince William: …[We’ll know it’s a success because] it's the look

that people give exactly as they come out. The feeling that everyone got. And at the same time, that we've actually got across our message both, you know, what our mother meant to us [Bl.M.] and

what we believe that she represented.

NBC got another chance to interview Prince Harry, and again it was turned

into a geo-platform:

HRH Prince Harry: Further Demonstrating the Royal Family’s Commitment to Coalition Objectives for Canada

The Queen’s grandson arrived in New York during the final days of May ’09 and demonstrated to all Fiefdom treatise recipients – original and new alike – and those to be purged and punished that the British

Monarch stood up to trans-generational corruption and China’s de facto governance and militarization of Her Dominion on May 8, 2007 and Her entire family is mobilized to see through to the end that intent to rid Canada of its malfeasant elements. The Prince has made several diplomatic contributions. One was high profiling in January 2004 the “Nazi” constituent of Canadian

governance. The other was geo-politicizing a lengthy interview with his brother, HRH Prince William, conducted by NBC’s Matt Lauer, in late June 2007.

The NBC interview broadcast on June 1, 2009 may have been relatively short – lasting slightly less than the 5 minutes 36 seconds the segment ran; but it packed into that short space of time all of the following. The Prince:

implicitly acknowledged the transfer of sovereign authority to the Custodian-in-Council by geo-politicizing the NBC interview;

acknowledged it’s been a long time since the Canadian lawyer was in the United States – in late February ’04 for his international incident triggering political asylum application;

he’ll be “well looked after” by the coalition in terms of his personal, professional, political and entrepreneurial needs and wishes;

The Prince has been watching the entire geo-political process unfold since being first introduced in late ’04;

He’s amazed at the scale of the Chinada threat and the response to it: He’s fully supportive of fundamental change in Canada’s paradigm of

governance; There is no doubt the coalition is going to be victorious over what

Chinada’s principals, financers, operatives and supporters are seeking to expand globally; and

The Canadian lawyer’s supra-celebrity status has been a reality for years and will continue indefinitely.

View video

Matt: Last time we talked Harry, you know, you hadn't been to

the States in a long time [1:15: Prince: Federer M.] and so now it's a return trip.

[...]

Prince: I've been [1:35: Branson M.] so well looked after by everybody and the accommodating of the American people has been so fantastic.

Matt: I watched the photographs [1:44: Prince: Federer-Cl.M.]

- I saw some of them of you at the World Trade Center site yesterday.

[...]

Prince: I think I was slightly surprised. I mean, I don't let myself

get moved by too much especially in public. But it was very surprising to be down there; and to sort of [2:04: Cl.M.] see the scale of it. I never really knew what to expect 'cause I never even saw the site on television

[Prince Harry M.]. But as you say, very very moving.

[...] Matt: Obviously what's changed is you were there [in

Afghanistan]; and [4:19: Price: Branson M.; Cl.M.] I'm just curious: that must change you fighting with your unit

in a profound way.

[...]

Just one more thing - a lot of people in this country, believe it or not, and I think you’re probably aware, are massively interested in what's going to happen with

Susan Boyle and 'Britain's Got Talent'. So I want you to handicap this for me. What are her chances of winning – It's going to happen this weekend.

Price: To be -- I'm going to -- [5:11: Erin M.]... Matt: We're going to run this Monday so you're either going to

be proven right or wrong. Prince: I probably shouldn't say, but I'm going to say anyway:

Susan Boyle - I think she's fantastic. Now let's be honest, I think she's going to get the [5:19: Anderson M.]

fame no matter what. And she's going to get the [Anderson M.] opportunity to sing in front of thousands of people...

It was necessary to summon up a measure of composure when receiving a

contribution that arrived on June 24, 2010. It was an initiative that wasn’t

expected from Her - being such an aggressive employment of the Clooney

M. and so enthusiastically executed to once again underscore Her

commitment and the legitimacy of the quantum that had been assessed

against enslavers, experimenters and torturers.

What triggered this remarkable and very much appreciated ratification of

quantum? Demonstrating how involved and up-to-date She is on all matters

relating to coalition interests and objectives, She’s reacting to what exploded

like a nuclear bomb of scandal a couple days previous. The event is referred

to in Chapter 3:

Canadian politicians accused of being under control of foreign governments

by Dirk Meissner

Toronto Star

June 23, 2010

National security experts are questioning the timing of a stunning allegation by the head of Canada’s spy agency that several Canadian politicians, including two provincial cabinet ministers, are under the control of foreign governments. […] Fadden declined to name the two cabinet ministers or

their provinces, but he said a number of public servants in British Columbia are also under suspicion. He said those politicians have not hidden their association with the foreign governments. But there have recently been indications that they are shifting their public policies because of the involvement with that particular country.

To make sure there was no doubt about Her resolve, arrangements were

made for The Sun newspaper to photograph and publish it -- lexiconically

representative of torture by stealth cognition technologies:

Queen Elizabeth at Wimbledon after 33 Years The Royal Forums June 25th, 2010 Elizabeth II was present at the Wimbledon Championships yesterday, to attend the second round match between Andy Murray of Scotland and Jarkko Nieminen of Finland.

After the match was over She toured the Wimbledon facility and cameras

followed Her around. Knowing she was live in the back-channel

environment, She employed the confidential language a second time, on this

occasion a Zeta-Jones Maneuver. And when on the steps of the building and

waving to the adoring crowd Her companion on this adventure, Her husband,

HRH The Duke of Kent, also employed the same constituent of the

international language to demonstrate to everyone on both sides of the 21st

century clash of civilizations how much containing China and fixing Canada

remained a top priority matter for the entire Royal Family.

Proceed to the next page