the campus of the future and today’s decisions (bk city) › ... · 03-04-2011 ·...

more information: http://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl 1

bezoek&Vrije&Universiteit&Brussel&Del4,&April&11,&2013&

The campus of the future and today’s decisions (BK city)

Dr. ir. Alexandra den Heijer

associate professor Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Netherlands

Managing the university campus Managing the European campus

•  book in 2011, since then: exploring the “European campus”

•  putting campus management on the strategic agenda

•  gathering data in European network

supporting campus decisions of EU member states

PHYSICAL definition of “campus”

city city

campus

campus

city buildings

buildings

buildings

buildings

the “campus” is defined as the (collection of) buildings and land, used for university or university-related

functions

FUNCTIONAL definition of “campus”

ACADEMIC: EDUCATION &

RESEARCH

RETAIL & LEISURE

RELATED BUSINESS

RESIDENTIAL

INFRASTRUCTURE

•  ACADEMIC classrooms, library, offices, laboratories, lecture halls, ...

•  RESIDENTIAL student housing, hotels, ...

•  RELATED BUSINESS incubators, industry, ...

•  RETAIL & LEISURE sports, restaurants, cafes, ...

•  INFRASTRUCTURE


RESEARCH

RETAIL & LEISURE

RELATED BUSINESS

RESIDENTIAL

INFRASTRUCTURE


The European campus is a key asset in “the (global) Battle for Brains”

good$facili*es$can$a.ract$talent$

bad$facili*es$can$chase$them$away…$$

proposition (PhD defence)

Each university goal can be frustrated by the physical campus

Cada&meta&universitaria&puede&verse&frustrada&por&el&campus&Bsico.&&Chaque&objecFf&universitaire&peut&être&contrecarré&par&la&réalité&physique&du&campus.&&Jedes&Hochschulziel&kann&durch&die&baulichen&Gegebenheiten&des&Campus&konterkariert&werden.&&Každý&cíl&vysoké&školy&může&být&zmařen&kampusem&/&infrastrukturou.&&&Universitetets&campusområde&kan&utgöra&eY&hinder&för&lärosätet&aY&uppnå&sina&mål.&&Elke&universiteitsdoelstelling&kan&door&de&fysieke&campus&worden&gefrustreerd.&&&

competitive advantage

productivity

profitability

sustainable development

performance criteria university

Each university goal can be frustrated by the physical campus

competitive advantage

productivity

profitability

sustainable development

performance&criteria&university&

each campus decision can positively or negatively affects these 4 performance criteria.

goal of “managing the university campus”: find campus strategy that optimally contributes to all performance criteria

strategic

policy makers

functional

users

controllers

financial

technical managers

physical

focus on university focus on real estate

stra

tegi

c op

erat

iona

l

campus decision

Managing the university campus

Every&project&or&campus&can&be&assessed&from&4&perspecFves&

Strategic

Policy makers

Functional

Users

Controllers

Financial

Technical managers

Physical m2


UU-4 RU-1 RUG-3 TUD-3 RUG-2 UU-5 RUG-5 EUR-2

Utrecht / UU Nijmegen / RU Groningen / RUG Delft / TUD Groningen / RUG Utrecht / UU Groningen / RUG Rotterdam / EUR

WU-2 TUE-4 UT-1 UT-3 WU-1 EUR-1 TUD-1 TUE-2

Wageningen / WU Eindhoven / TUE Enschede / UT Enschede / UT Wageningen / WU Rotterdam / EUR Delft / TUD Eindhoven / TUE

RUG-4 LEI-1 UvA-1 TUD-2 UT-2 VU-2 RUG-6 LEI-2

Groningen / RUG Leiden / LEI Amsterdam / UvA Delft / TUD Enschede / UT Amsterdam / VU Groningen / RUG Leiden / LEI

UU-3 VU-1 UvT-1 UM-2 WU-3 EUR-3 RUG-1 UM-3

Utrecht / UU Amsterdam / VU Tilburg / UvT Maastricht / UM Wageningen / WU Rotterdam / EUR Groningen / RUG Maastricht / UM

RU-2 UvA-2 UU-1 TUE-1 UU-2 UM-1 TUE-3 TUD-4

Nijmegen / RU Amsterdam / UvA Utrecht / UU Eindhoven / TUE Utrecht / UU Maastricht / UM Eindhoven / TUE Delft/TUD

trends “on campus”


RESEARCH

RETAIL & LEISURE

RELATED BUSINESS

RESIDENTIAL

INFRASTRUCTURE

•  ACADEMIC classrooms, library, offices, laboratories, lecture halls, ...

•  RESIDENTIAL student housing, hotels, ...

•  RELATED BUSINESS incubators, industry, ...

•  RETAIL & LEISURE sports, restaurants, cafes, ...

•  INFRASTRUCTURE

campus strategy “to share or not to be…”

ORGANISATIONAL LEVELS / potential partners for shared use, management and/or ownership global continental national regional local university faculty department section individual

world Europe Netherlands region city campus building zone subzone place PHYSICAL SCALES / resources to accommodate the required campus functions

ACADEMIC FUNCTIONS • EDUCATION & RESEARCH

RESIDENTIAL FUNCTIONS

RETAIL & LEISURE FUNCTIONS

RELATED BUSINESS FUNCTIONS

INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONS

mod

els

for s

hare

d us

e/m

anag

emen

t/ow

ners

hip

w

ith in

tern

al p

artn

ers

on c

ampu

s

mod

els

for s

hare

d us

e/m

anag

emen

t/ow

ners

hip

with

ext

erna

l par

tner

s on

cam

pus

Campus of the future: - lecture halls – only to share (photo: VU Amsterdam)

Campus of the future: - transparency, shared facilities (photo: VU Amsterdam) Office&environment&to&share&


Campus of the future: - creating the place to meet (photo: Library TU Delft)

Campus of the future: - sustainable solutions -  CO2 neutral campus -  less m2, more quality (photo: Wageningen)

Campus of the future: - more quality, less quantity -  new life for old buildings -  increase benefits / m2 to cover high maintenance cost / m2 - users accept more defects of meaningful, historic buildings

photo Maastricht University Reducing m2, but improving… Quality of place (interior design)

La Chaise&Screen,Charles&Ray Eames, 1948

Armchair, Ib Kofod-Lar-sen, ± 1950

LCM, Charles&Ray Eames, 1945 LCW, Charles&Ray Eames, 1945 Stool 60, Alvar Aalto,1933

Low Table Set, Frank Gehry,1972

LTR Table, Charles&RayEames, 1950

Revolt chair, Friso Kramer,1953

MedaMorph, Alberto Meda,2006

MedaPro+, Alberto Meda,1998

Chair, W.H. Gispen, 1929-1930

Metal Side Table,Ronan&Erwan Bouroullec,

Daybed, George Nelson, 1948 Nelson Tables, GeorgeNelson, 1960

Chair, unknown,1900-1910

EA108, Charles&Ray Eames,1958

Folding chair Dafne, RinaldiGastone, 1980

EA124, Charles&Ray Eames,1958

Elephant Stool, Sori Yanagi,1954

Armchair, G. Th Rietveld,1927

Elliptical Table ETR, Charles&Ray Eames, 1951 Gueridon, Jean Prouvé, 1949 Fauteuil, N.K. Roerichl,1904

EM Table, Jean Prouvé, 1950

Freeform Sofa, Isamu Noguchi, 1946 Armchair, Han Pieck, 1946-1948 Joyn, Ronan&Erwan Bouroullec, 200244 45

source: BK city guide – see http://www.bk.tudelft.nl/bkcity - photos & furniture by VITRA - http://www.vitra.com

Reducing m2, but improving… Quality of place (cultural heritage)

Reducing m2, but improving… Quality of life (campus & city)


luchtfoto campus

10-04-13

Challenge the future Delft University of Technology

BK6050 - Vastgoedmanagement

[titel eigen college] [Alexandra den Heijer]

FIRE – foto�s

Fire destroyed Architecture building May 13, 2008

Teletekst&–&bezoek&minister&

Emergency))management))<)3)days))a0er)the)fire)


Found a ‘new’ building within 10 days

sustainable = re-use

ASSIGNMENT: relocate 3300 students and > 800 employees DEADLINE: renovate 32.000 m2< 6 months + new construction 4.000 m2 < next 6 months

Foto’s bezoek Julianalaan

luchaoto&gebouw&

Phase)1)5)EAST:)&16.000&m2&gfa&in&use&September&2008&

Phase)2)5)WEST:)&16.000&m2&gfa&in&use&November&2008&

Phase)3)–)GLASS)HOUSES:)&4.000&m2&gfa&new&in&use&May&2009&

Undergraduates < 4 months after fire Project ready < 1 year



42.000 m2 32.000 m2

Design the building as a city

footprint old ! new

Berlageweg 42.000 m2 bvo Julianalaan 32.000 m2 bvo

+ new glasshouses 4.000 m2 bvo = 36.000 m2

source: projectgroep BK city, programmateam

bvo = bruto vloeroppervlak =gross floor area (gfa) no = nuttig oppervlak = usable floor area (ufa)

GOALS ORGANISATION 1.  Community building 2.  More effective support of

education, research & management

3.  Creating the place to meet 4.  Stimulate social interaction

& intellectual interaction 5.  Flexible use of facilities 6.  Sustainable

Private ! Public space Contextual Concept: Connectivity and variety

luchtfoto gebouw



Transition from old to new less BVO (gfa), more NO (ufa)

functions Berlageweg Julianalaan

1. studio space 5,680 7,840 + 38% student back at the faculty

2. office space 6,300 6,340 + 1% but other concept

3. lecture halls 1,090 1,110 + 2% and same capacity

4. library 650 870 + 34% with more places to study

5. educ. facilities 3,580 3,250 - 9% more sharing, better use

6. laboratories 860 660 - 23% more sharing at TU level

7. conference 1,100 770 - 30% more sharing at TU level

8. restaurants 380 690 + 82% multi-functional use

9. public functions 1,220 2,050 + 68% more places to meet

10. storage 3,300 1,240 - 62% (start with) less after fire

total (usable) 24,160 24,820 + 3% more usable space

Julianalaan / Berlageweg

TransiFon&from&old&to&new&>&50%&is&studio&or&office&space&














1.&Studio&space& 1.&Studio&space&

k &student&back&at&the&faculty&k &6&m2&usable&per&workplace&&k !&became&less&a4er&decision&process&&k &tables&are&assigned&to&groups&of&students&&per&semester&(no&permanent&territory)&k &smart&use&of&space&(by&smart&scheduling)&

STUDIO space Sept 1, 2008 Sept 4, 2008

Sept 18, 2008 Sept 18, 2008


2.&Office&space& 2.&Office&space&

k &no&individual&territory&k &12&m2&usable&per&4e&&!&became&more&a4er&design&process&k &acFvity&related&concept&

More&facility&sharing&














3.&Lecture&halls&k &more&shared&use&of&large&halls&k &more&small&spaces&locally&&

k &flexible&floor&plan&k &differenFaFon&of&quality:&&&&also&used&for&&&&seminars&/&conferences&

7.&Conference&rooms&


4.&Library& 5.&EducaFonal&faciliFes&

6.&Laboratories& CreaFng&the&place&to&meet&














8.&Restaurants&&&bars& 8.&Restaurants&&&bars&


9.&Public&funcFons& Public space, like in a city

9.&Public&space&

•  usable&space&in&corridors&for&informal&meeFngs&and&work&

10.&Storage&!&including&digital&storage&

Questions / tour of BK City

Follow me on Twitter: @alexandra_dh

More about case BK city & book

“Managing the university campus”: http://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl

the campus of the future and today’s decisions (bk city) › ... · 03-04-2011 ·...

Documents