the carbonate radical is a site-selective oxidizing agent of
TRANSCRIPT
The Carbonate Radical Is a Site-Selective Oxidizing Agent of Guanine
in Double-Stranded Oligonucleotides§
Vladimir Shafirovich,* Alexander Dourandin, Weidong Huang, and Nicholas E. Geacintov
From the Chemistry Department and Radiation and Solid State Laboratory,
31 Washington Place, New York University, New York, New York 10003-5180
Running title: Carbonate Radical Is a Site-Selective Oxidizing Agent
Copyright 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
JBC Papers in Press. Published on April 24, 2001 as Manuscript M101131200 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
SUMMARY
The carbonate anion radical (CO3.-) is believed to be an important intermediate oxidant derived
from the oxidation of bicarbonate anions and nitrosoperoxocarboxylate anions (formed in the
reaction of CO2 with ONOO-) in cellular environments. Employing nanosecond laser flash
photolysis methods, we show that CO3.- anion can selectively oxidize guanines in the self-
complementary oligonucleotide duplex d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT) dissolved in air-
equilibrated aqueous buffer solution (pH 7.5). In these time-resolved transient absorbance
experiments, the CO3.- radicals are generated by one-electron oxidation of the bicarbonate
anions (HCO3-) with sulfate radical anions (SO4.-) which, in turn, are derived from the
photodissociation of persulfate anions (S2O82-) initiated by 308 nm XeCl excimer laser pulse
excitation. The kinetics of the CO3.- anion and neutral guanine radicals, G(-H)., arising from
the rapid deprotonation of the guanine radical cation, are monitored via their transient absorption
spectra (characteristic maxima at 600 and 312 nm, respectively) on time scales of microseconds
to seconds. The bimolecular rate constant of oxidation of guanine in this oligonucleotide duplex
by CO3.- is (1.9±0.2)×107 M-1s-1. The decay of the CO3.- anions and the formation of G(-
H). radicals are correlated with one another on the millisecond time scale, while the neutral guanine
radicals decay on time scales of seconds. Alkali-labile guanine lesions are produced, and are
revealed by treatment of the irradiated oligonucleotides in hot piperidine solution. The DNA
fragments thus formed are identified by a standard polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis assay,
2 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
showing that strand cleavage occurs at the guanine sites only. The biological implications of
these oxidative processes are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
There is growing evidence that bicarbonate and carbon dioxide, both present in biological
systems in significant amounts, can alter the mechanisms and reaction pathways of reactive
oxygen (1-4) and nitrogen (5-13) species formed during normal metabolic activity and under
conditions of oxidative stress. It has been proposed that the mechanism of generation of
carbonate radical anions (CO3.-)1 from bicarbonate (HCO3-) or CO2 can involve the one-
electron oxidation of HCO3- at the active site of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (3,4), and
homolysis of the nitrosoperoxycarbonate anion (ONOOCO2-) formed by the reaction of
peroxynitrite with carbon dioxide (14-18).
The carbonate radical anion is a strong one-electron oxidant that oxidizes appropriate
electron donors via electron transfer mechanisms (19). Detailed pulse radiolysis studies have
shown that carbonate radicals can rapidly abstract electrons from aromatic amino acids (tyrosine
and tryptophan). However, reactions of CO3.- with S-containing methionine and cysteine are
less efficient (20-22). Hydrogen atom abstraction by carbonate radicals is generally very slow
(19) and their reactivities with other amino acids are negligible (20-22). It is well established
that carbonate radicals can play an important role in the modification of selective amino acids in
3 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
proteins in cellular environments under conditions of oxidative stress, aging, and inflammatory
processes (1,11,12).
The role of HCO3-/ CO2 in potentiating oxidative DNA damage has received relatively little
attention. It has been shown that the presence of HCO3- / CO2 inhibits direct strand cleavage of
DNA induced by peroxynitrite (ONOO-), but enhances the formation of 8-nitroguanine (8-
nitro-G), alkali- and Fpg-labile DNA lesions (23-25). Peroxynitrite causes direct DNA strand
cleavage by oxidizing deoxyribose. However, in the presence of HCO3-/ CO2 there is a shift in
product distribution from direct strand cleavage, to the formation of oxidative modifications of
guanines (26), suggesting that the carbonate radical anion could play an important role in this
phenomenon (24). While guanine is indeed the most easily oxidized base in DNA, the reactions
of the carbonate radical anions with the different aromatic DNA residues have not yet been
characterized.
In this work, we explore the electron transfer reactions from guanine electron donor residues
embedded in the self-complementary hexadecanucleotide duplex d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT)
to CO3.- electron acceptor. Employing transient absorbance laser flash photolysis techniques,
we monitored simultaneously the kinetics of disappearance of the CO3.- anion radical and the
appearance of guanine radicals by transient absorption spectroscopy techniques. The decay of
the CO3.- radical anion was followed by monitoring its absorbance (λmax ~ 600 nm), while the
concomitant formation of guanine neutral radicals, G(-H)., was identified by their characteristic
4 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
narrow absorption band at 312 nm. These observations constitute the first direct indication that
carbonate radicals are site-selective one-electron oxidants of guanine residues in double-stranded
DNA and do not react significantly with any of the other nucleic acid bases A, C or T. The
oxidation of the different guanines in the self-complementary DNA duplex results in alkali-
labile guanine lesions; these are revealed by the site-selective DNA strand cleavage induced by
a standard hot piperidine treatment and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis assay.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials — 2’-deoxyguanosine 5’-monophospate (dGMP), 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2’-
deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG), and all inorganic salts (>99% purity) were obtained from Sigma-
Aldrich Fine Chemicals, and were used as received. The d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT)
oligonucleotide was synthesized by standard automated phosphoramidite chemistry techniques.
The tritylated oligonucleotide was removed from the solid support and deprotected with
concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The crude oligonuclotide was purified by reversed phase
HPLC, and detritylated in 80% acetic acid according to standard protocols.
The oligonucleotide was dissolved in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM
Na2SO4. Annealing of the two strands was accomplished by heating the samples to 90 oC for 10
min, and then allowing the samples to cool slowly back to room temperature overnight.
Laser flash photolysis — The transient absorption spectra were recorded using a pulsed laser
excitation source and a kinetic spectrometer system (~7 ns response time) described earlier (27-
30). Briefly, this system consists of a pulsed Lambda Physik EMG 160 MSC XeCl excimer laser
5 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
(308 nm, full width at half maximum pulse width ~ 12 ns, energy ~ 70 mJ pulse-1 cm-2, 0.1
Hz), and a 75 W pulsed xenon lamp to probe the transient absorption kinetics. The probe flash
was passed through a McPherson monochromator and was monitored by a Hamamatsu R928
phomultiplier; its output was recorded and digitized using a Tektronix TDS 620 oscilloscope. All
experiments, including data collection and analysis, were controlled by a computer.
The CO3.- radical anions were generated by oxidation of HCO3- with SO4.- radical anions
(31,32). The SO4.- ions were generated by the photodisscociation of persulfate anions (31,33).
While persulfate ions exhibit neglible reactivity with nucleosides and oligonucleotides, the
SO4.- radical anions are known to react with the DNA bases. The triggered dissociation of persulfate
ions into SO4.- radical anions in time-resolved pulse radiolysis or flash photolysis experiments
has been previously employed by Steenken et al.(34-36), O’Neill et al.(37), and Hildebrandt et
al.(38), to study the kinetics of reactions of the SO4.- radical anions with nucleic acids.
Air-equilibrated buffer solutions containing 20 - 100 µM oligonucleotide duplexes, 300 mM
NaHCO3, and 25 mM Na2S2O8, were placed in a 0.5 mL quartz flow cell (~80% transmittance
at 200 nm) from NSG Precision Cells, Inc. The optical pathlength of this cell was 1 cm, and the
cell was aligned parallel to the direction of the xenon lamp probe light beam. After 1 laser shot,
the irradiated solution was replaced by a fresh sample solution employing a computer-controlled
flow system. All laser flash photolysis experiments were performed at 20 oC.
Pseudo-first order rate constants (kn’) of the radical (R.) + substrate (S) reactions, and the
6 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
second order rate constants of the radical recombination were determined by least-squares fits of
the appropriate, indicated kinetic equations to the transient absorption profiles obtained in five
different experiments with five different samples. The second order rate constants of the R. + S
reactions were calculated by a least-square best fit to a linear dependence of the kn’ vs [S] plots.
Steady-state spectroscopy — Routine UV absorption spectra and UV melting profiles were
measured using an HP 84453 diode array spectrophotometer with an HP 89090A Peltier
temperature control unit (Hewlett Packard GMBH, Waldbronn, Germany).
Oxidative DNA strand cleavage assay — The oligonucleotides were labeled at their 5’
termini by using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and [γ-32P]ATP (New
England Nuclear, Boston, MA) as described previously (27). The 10 µL samples containing 32P
5’-end-labeled oligonucleotide strands in 2×2 mm square pyrex capillary tubes (Vitrocom, Inc.)
were irradiated with 308 nm laser light. After the irradiation, the reaction mixture was quenched
by the addition of β-mercaptoethanol and was heated for 30 min at 90 oC in 100 µL of a 1 M
piperidine solution. The samples were vacuum dried and assayed by a denaturing polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (20% acrylamide, 19:1 bis ratio, 7 M urea), as described previously (27). The
relative intensities of cleavage were analyzed using a Bio-Rad 250 imaging system (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA).
RESULTS
Duplex design — The duplex formed by the self-complementary 16-mer
d(AACG1CG2AATTCG3CG4TT) sequence contains the 12-mer d(CG1CG2AATTCG3CG4) core. The latter
7 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
the first oligonucleotide duplex containing at least one turn of helix for which structural
information was obtained by single-crystal x-ray diffraction methods (39,40) and high-
resolution NMR spectroscopy (41,42). We added one AA and one TT doublet to the two ends of
this 12-mer to diminish the known fraying (42) of the G:C base pairs at or near the ends of the
oligonucleotide. The 16-mer duplex exhibits well defined cooperative melting curves. The
average melting temperature, Tm,= 67±1 oC and the hyperchromicity of ~17 % were calculated
from plots of the absorbance (260 nm) versus temperature obtained from heating - cooling
cycles (43).
Generation of CO3.- radicals by the oxidation of HCO3- by SO4.- radicals. The kinetic
parameters associated with the reactions of HCO3- and S2O82- in aqueous solutions induced
by laser pulse excitation, are well documented (19). The excitation of S2O82- in aqueous
solutions with 308 nm XeCl excimer laser pulses generates the SO4.- radical anions (reaction 1,
Table 1) with a quantum yield of 0.55 (33). The SO4.- radicals exhibit transient absorption
bands at 445 nm with an exctinction coefficients of 1600 M-1cm-1 (44). In pure aqueous buffer
solutions, the SO4.- radical anions decay mostly via bimolecular recombination processes
(reaction 2, Table 1). In the presence of HCO3-, the decay of SO4.- monitored at 445 nm
results in the formation of the CO3.- radicals, identified by their characteristic absorption band
with a maximum at 600 nm and molar extinction coefficient of 1970 M-1cm-1 (45). This effect
8 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
is attributed to the reduction of SO4.- by HCO3- with the formation of CO3.- (reaction 3,
Table 1); the HCO3. radical, the primary product of the one-electron oxidation of HCO3-, is a
very strong acid (pKa < 0) and thus deprotonates rapidly in aqueous solutions (46). The
recombination of the CO3.- radicals is a slow process (reaction 4, Table 1) occurring via
transfer of O- anions from one CO3.- radical to another, thus forming carbon dioxide and
peroxymonocarbonate (47). The rate constants of reactions 2- 4 measured during the course of
this work, are also summarized in Table 1; these values differ only slightly from published
values because of differences in ionic strength (45).
Transient absorption studies of the oxidation of guanine by CO3.- radicals in DNA
Duplexes — Typical transient absorption spectra of a solution of d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT)
duplexes (50 µM) containing 25 mM S2O82- and 300 mM HCO3-, recorded at various delay
times (∆t) after 308 nm laser pulse excitation, are shown in Figure 1. The transient absorption
spectrum recorded at ∆t = 60 µs exhibiting a maximum at 600 nm, corresponds to the well-
known spectrum of the CO3.- radical (31,45,46); at this HCO3- concentration (300 mM) the
decay of the SO4.- anion radicals occurs rapidly (within ~ 0.7 µs), and is not shown in Figure
1. The decay of the CO3.- absorption band is accompanied by the rise of another, narrow
transient absorption band centered at 310 nm. This spectrum, recorded at ∆t = 3.9 ms, is
characteristic of both the guanine radical cation, G.+, and the neutral guanine radical, G(-H).
9 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
(34). Thus, the carbonate radical is a site-selective one-electron oxidant of guanine residues in
double-stranded DNA (reaction 5, Table 1). As shown below (DNA strand cleavage assay), the
oxidation of the other three DNA bases by CO3.- anion radicals is significantly less efficient
than that of guanine. This is consistent with the relative rate constants of one-electron oxidation
of 2’-deoxynucleotide monophosphates by CO3.- radicals. In the case of dGMP, the rate
constant is some 20 - 40 times greater than the rate constant determined for dAMP, dCMP, and
dTMP (Table 1, reactions 6 - 9). However, the rate constant of oxidation of 8-oxo-dG is
greater by a factor of ~ 10 (Table 1, reaction 10) than that of dGMP (36).
Deprotonation of guanine radical cations. The pKa of free guanine radical cations, G.+,
generated by the one-electron oxidation of dG or dGMP, is 3.9 (34). Therefore, in neutral
aqueous solutions, deprotonation of G.+ occurs rapidly (rate constant k ~ 2 ×106 s-1). Candeias
and Steenken (34) proposed that in double-stranded DNA, with the G.+ radical hydrogen-
bonded to its partner Watson-Crick cytosine residue (pKa = 4.45), the deprotonation rate
constant of G.+ should be even greater than in the case of free G.+ . The neutral G(-H). radical
has indeed been detected by ESR techniques upon oxidation of double-stranded DNA in
aqueous solutions at room temperature (48,49). Hence, the guanine radicals observed on
millisecond time scales (Figure 1) are neutral radicals, G(-H)., rather than G.+ radical cations.
Kinetics of guanine oxidation by CO3.- radicals in DNA duplexes. In the absence of DNA,
the bimolecular recombination of two CO3.- radicals occurs and the rate constant, k4, of this
10 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
bimolecular reaction has been reported (see, Table 1, reaction 4). Consequently, the decay profile
of CO3.- radical, monitored at 600 nm (Figure 1), can be described by mixed first- and second-
order kinetics:
-d[CO3.-]/dt = k5’ [CO3.-] + 2k4 [CO3.-]2
Equation 1
The pseudo-first order rate constant k5’ = k5 [DNA], where [DNA] is the concentration of
DNA duplexes, and k5 is the rate constant of reaction of the CO3.- anion radicals with the DNA
duplexes. Defining the initial concentration of carbonate radical anions (at t = 0) as[CO3.-]0 ,
the solution of Eq. 1 yields the following expression for the time dependence of the CO3.-
radical concentration:
[CO3.-]t = k5’ [CO3.-]0 /{(k5’ + 2k4 [CO3.-]0) exp (k5’ t) - 2k4 [CO3.-]0}
Equation 2
The value of k5’ was determined by fitting Eq. 2 to the CO3.- decay profiles measured at 600
nm and at different DNA concentrations. The value of k4 was determined in the absence of the
DNA duplex (Table 1). As expected, k5’ increases linearly with the concentration of the DNA
duplex (Figure 2), yielding a value of k5 = 1.9×107 M-1 s-1. The rate of oxidation of dGMP
11 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
by CO3.- radicals was determined by similar experiments (data not shown), and the rate constant
k6 = 6.6×107 M-1 s-1 (Table 1). The rate constant of oxidation of free dGMP (k6) is ~ 3.5
times larger than k5, the value of the rate constant for the oxidation of G within the DNA duplex.
The apparent decrease in the reactivity of guanines in the duplexes is probably associated with a
decreased accessibility of guanines to the CO3.- radicals (see below).
Decay kinetics of G(-H). radicals. The decay of the G(-H). radicals in the double stranded
oligonucleotide is shown on two different time scales in Figure 3. On the < 100 ms time scale
(insert, Figure 3), the change in G(-H). radical concentrations is too small to be measurable, but
a slow decay is evident on a time scale of 0.8 s (Figure 3).
Chemical damage in double-stranded DNA induced by CO3.- radicals. The rate constant of
reaction of SO4.- radicals with DNA is greater than that of CO3.- radicals (reactions 11 and 5,
respectively, Table 1). The value of k11 = 5×109 M-1 s-1 (Table 1) was determined from the
kinetic decay profiles of the SO4.- radical anions monitored at 445 nm (absorption maximum of
SO4.- ) in solution containing a 50 µM concentration of the d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT)
duplex and 25 mM S2O82-. This constant is close to the rate constant of the oxidation of dG by
SO4.- radicals (k = 2.3×109 M-1 s-1) reported by O’Neill and Davies (37). In order to
minimize the generation of G(-H). by SO4.- radicals in the DNA cleavage experiments and to
12 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
focus on the reaction of CO3.- radicals with the DNA duplex, a 300 mM concentration of
HCO3- was selected in these experiments. Under these conditions, the SO4.- radicals decay
predominately via reactions with HCO3- and their lifetimes are less than 0.7 µs (data not
shown). Thus, reactions of CO3.- with the DNA duplex are dominant.
DNA strand cleavage. These experiments were performed with the aim of determining
whether all guanines are uniformly damaged after reaction with CO3.- radical anions. Oxidative
guanine base damage in DNA can be revealed by treatment with hot piperidine solutions which
gives rise to strand cleavage at the damaged sites (50). The cleaved fragments thus formed can be
visualized by high resolution gel electrophoresis. Typical results, obtained after irradiation and
hot alkali treatment of a solution of a 10 µM d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT) duplex, 10 mM
S2O82- and 300 mM HCO3- with 308 nm excimer laser pulses, are depicted in the gel autoraodigraph
in Figure 4 (Panel A). Oligonucleotide strand cleavage is negligible in the unirradiated control
samples with or without hot piperidine treatment (lanes 1 and 2, respectively). However, upon
irradiation, cleavage is observed mostly at the guanine sites and the extent of strand cleavage is
more pronounced after hot piperidine treatment (lanes 4 and 6) than before (lanes 3 and 5). In
lanes 3 and 4 the total energy dosage received by the sample was 0.4 J/cm2 while in lanes 4 and
6 the dosage was ~ ten times higher. The extent of damage increases with the laser energy
dosage. It is evident that the sites of cleavage correlate well with the cleavage pattern obtained by
the Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reaction (lane G), clearly indicating that strand cleavage occurs
13 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
predominantly at the four different guanines in the self-complementary oligonucleotide duplex.
The relative cleavage efficiencies at the different guanines are shown in panel B, Figure 4. The
probability of strand cleavage at these sites differs, being higher at the guanines G1 and G2
closer to the ends of the oligonucleotide than at sites G2 and G3 that are positioned closer to the
center of the duplex. In these experiments the overall percentage of DNA strands cleaved was
less than 5%, indicating that the DNA duplexes suffered, on average, less than one DNA strand
cleavage event per molecule (0.4 mJ/cm2 dosage). A the higher dosage, the fraction of cleaved
DNA strands increased to 40-45%. Nevertheless, strand cleavage at sites other than guanine
remains small (Figure 4, Panel C). These results clearly indicate that the CO3.- radical anion is
a site-selective oxidizing agent of guanines in double-stranded DNA. These hot piperidine-
induced strand cleavage results are in good agreement with the spectroscopic laser photolysis
data. The latter results suggest that carbonate radical anions react by one-electron transfer
mechanisms more readily with guanine than with the other three DNA bases.
DISCUSSION
Selective oxidation of guanines in DNA by CO3.- radicals. . The selective reactivity of the
CO3.- radicals with guanine rather than with any of the other three DNA bases, is a consequence
of the thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics of these electron donor/acceptor reactions. The
redox potential of the CO3.- radicals at pH 7, estimated from the redox potential E0(CO3.-
14 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
/CO32-) = 1.59 V vs NHE (51) and the pKa values of 6.37 (CO2,H2O/HCO3-) and 10.25 (HCO3-
/CO32-) (52), and pKa < 0 (HCO3./CO3.-) (46), is ~ 1.7 V vs NHE. The selective oxidation of
guanines by CO3.- radicals is thus thermodynamically feasible. Since the redox potential of free
dG, E7[dG(-H)./dG] = 1.29 V vs NHE, is smaller than the redox potential of dA, E7[dA(-H).
/dA] = 1.42 V vs NHE, and that of the pyrimidine bases, E7 = 1.7 V (dT) and 1.6 V (dC) vs NHE
(35), it is reasonable that only guanine residues in DNA are oxidized by CO3.- radical anions.
The oxidized guanine derivative 8-oxo-dG, a product of two-electron oxidation of guanine
(50), is further oxidized by CO3.- radicals with a greater rate constant than in the case of
guanine (Table 1). This enhanced reactivity of 8-oxo-dG with CO3.- radicals is correlated with
its lower redox potential, E7 = 0.74 V vs NHE (36), which is smaller than the redox potentials of
the other nucleosides discussed.
Rate constants of interaction of the CO3.- radicals with guanines. It is interesting to note
that the rate constant of oxidation of dGMP by CO3.- radical anions (k6 = 6.6×107 M-1 s-1,
Table 1) is much lower than the rate constants of dGMP oxidation by aromatic radical cations
with similar redox potentials. For instance, radical cations of the pyrene derivative 7,8,9,10-
tetrahydroxytetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (E0 ~ 1.5 V vs NHE, ref. 53), and thioanisole (E0 = 1.45
V vs NHE, ref. 54), oxidize dGMP or dG with rate constants of 1.7×109 M-1s-1 (55), and
15 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
1.4×109 M-1s-1 (35), respectively. These results indicate that the reactivity of CO3.- radicals with
guanines is lower than expected from differences in redox potentials alone. Schindler et al. (56)
have shown that the CO3.-/CO32- system is characterized by a small self-exchange rate
constant (k = 0.4 M-1s-1), and a high internal reorganization energy that results in a low
reactivity of CO3.- in bimolecular outer sphere electron transfer reactions. Furthermore, in
double-stranded DNA the rate constant of oxidation of guanines is even lower than in the case of
free dGMP. This value, k6 = 1.9×107 M-1 s-1 (Table 1), is averaged over the four different
guanine sites G1, G2, G3, and G4. The cleavage efficiencies (Figure 4, Panel B) are lower at the
two central guanines G2 and G3 than at the outer guanines G1 and G4. These variations in
reactivities correlate roughly with the imino proton exchange rates, and thus the base pair
opening rates, in the different G:C base pairs in the 12-mer d(CG1CG2AATTCG3CG4) studied
by Patel and co-workers (42). Thus, the lower reactivities of the CO3.- radical anion with
guanines in double stranded DNA are most likely due to site-dependent base pair opening rates
(42), and probably to steric hindrance factors as well.
The long lifetimes of guanine radicals, G(-H)., in double stranded DNA. It is interesting to
note that the lifetimes of the G(-H). radicals are significantly longer in the double stranded
oligonucleotide (Figure 3), than the lifetimes of either dGMP(-H). or dG(-H). radicals in
solution (27,29,57). Furthermore, the lifetime of the G(-H). radicals in the
16 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT) duplex (Figure 3) is orders of magnitudes longer than in
oligonucleotide duplexes in which these radicals are generated by one-electron transfer reactions
from G to 2-aminopurine (2AP) radicals (28). In the latter case, as well as in the present
experiments, the lifetime measurements were conducted in air- or oxygen-equilibrated
solutions. Thus, differences in the decay rates due to reactions of G(-H). with O2 can be ruled
out. In the case of the 2AP modified duplexes, 2AP radicals were generated by two-photon
photoionization of 2AP residues, thus generating hydrated electrons as well. The hydrated
electrons are efficiently scavenged by molecular oxygen resulting in the formation of O2.-
radicals (58). Hence, a possible reason for the faster decay of the G(-H). radicals in the 2AP
modified duplexes is the fast reaction of G(-H). radicals with O2.- radicals. Recently, Candeias
and Steenken (59) have reported that the reaction of G(-H). with O2.- indeed occurs rapidly
with a rate constant that is nearly diffusion-controlled (~ 3×109 M-1 s-1). In contrast, the
reaction of G(-H). with O2 (60) is very slow (k ≤ 102 M-1 s-1). A lifetime of G(-H). in DNA
as long as ~5 s has been reported (48). The presence or absence of O2.- could thus be one
crucial factor which determines the lifetime of G(-H). radicals in double-stranded DNA.
Multiple pathways of CO3.- generation in biological systems. It is generally accepted that
aging, chronic inflammation, and diverse infectious disorders are associated with an enhanced
production of reactive oxygen species, like superoxide radicals (O2.-), hydrogen peroxide
17 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
(H2O2), and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) (61-63). Hydroxyl radicals produced by the one-electron
reduction of H2O2 in Fenton-type reactions are well-known species that can induce oxidative
modifications and damage to the DNA (50,64). However, .OH radicals are extremely reactive
and thus have a very limited range of diffusion (65). Therefore, .OH radicals induce damage to
biomolecules only within the immediate locale where they are generated. Wolcott et al.(66) have
proposed that .OH radicals can oxidize HCO3- anions and thus generate the CO3.- radicals that
are less reactive than the .OH radicals. Recently, Kalyanaraman and co-workers (3,4) have
shown that the enhancement of peroxidase activity of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1)
in the presence of HCO3- (67) is associated with the generation of CO3.- radicals by one-
electron oxidation of HCO3- occurring at the enzyme active site.
Still another source of carbonate anion radicals might be of importance. Inflammatory and
infectious processes are associated with the generation of not only reactive oxygen species, but
also of nitric oxide (.NO) catalyzed by .NO synthase type 2 (68,69). Beckman and co-workers
(70) have proposed that the stimulated generation of .NO and O2.- radicals in vivo can results
in the formation of the highly reactive and toxic peroxynitrite (ONOO-). The combination of
.NO and O2.- occurs with a diffusion-controlled rate constant, k = (6.7 - 19)×109 M-1 s-1
(71,72). That leads to the formation of ONOO- even at very low concentrations of .NO and O2.-
. Lymar and Hurst (6) have demonstrated that in neutral aqueous solutions, ONOO- rapidly
18 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
reacts with CO2 (k = 3×104 M-1 s-1) to yield a highly unstable nitrosoperoxycarbonate anion
(ONOOCO2-). Homolytic dissociation of ONOOCO2- occurring on submicrosecond time
scales (73) produces CO3.- and .NO2 radicals with a cage escape yield of ~ 0.3 (16,18).
Hence, due to the relatively high concentrations of HCO3- / CO2 in intracellular and
interstitial fluids of up to 30 mM (74), response to aging, chronic inflammation, and diverse
infectious disorders might also include the enhanced generation of CO3.- radicals that can
damage not only proteins (1,12), but also DNA, as shown in this report.
19 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
References
1. Stadtman, E. R., and Berlett, B. S. (1998) Drug Metab Rev 30(2), 225-43
2. Epperlein, M. M., Nourooz-Zadeh, J., Jayasena, S. D., Hothersall, J. S., Noronha-Dutra, A.,
and Neild, G. H. (1998) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9(3), 457-463
3. Goss, S. P., Singh, R. J., and Kalyanaraman, B. (1999) J Biol Chem 274(40), 28233-9
4. Zhang, H., Joseph, J., Felix, C., and Kalyanaraman, B. (2000) J Biol Chem 275(19), 14038-
45
5. Radi, R., Cosgrove, T. P., Beckman, J. S., and Freeman, B. A. (1993) Biochem. J. 290(1),
51-57
6. Lymar, S. V., and Hurst, J. K. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117(34), 8867-8868
7. Lymar, S. V., and Hurst, J. K. (1996) Chem Res Toxicol 9(5), 845-50
8. Gow, A., Duran, D., Thom, S. R., and Ischiropoulos, H. (1996) Arch Biochem Biophys
333(1), 42-8
9. Uppu, R. M., Squadrito, G. L., and Pryor, W. A. (1996) Arch Biochem Biophys 327(2), 335-
343
10. Caulfield, J. L., Singh, S. P., Wishnok, J. S., Deen, W. M., and Tannenbaum, S. R. (1996) J
Biol Chem 271(42), 25859-63
11. Berlett, B. S., Levine, R. L., and Stadtman, E. R. (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(6),
20 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
2784-9
12. Tien, M., Berlett, B. S., Levine, R. L., Chock, P. B., and Stadtman, E. R. (1999) Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 96(14), 7809-14
13. Jourd’heuil, D., Miranda, K. M., Kim, S. M., Espey, M. G., Vodovotz, Y., Laroux, S., Mai,
C. T., Miles, A. M., Grisham, M. B., and Wink, D. A. (1999) Arch Biochem Biophys 365(1),
92-100
14. Lymar, S. V., and Hurst, J. K. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 37(2), 294-301
15. Goldstein, S., and Czapski, G. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120(14), 3458-3463
16. Goldstein, S., and Czapski, G. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121(11), 2444-2447
17. Bonini, M. G., Radi, R., Ferrer-Sueta, G., Ferreira, A. M., and Augusto, O. (1999) J Biol
Chem 274(16), 10802-6
18. Hodges, G. R., and Ingold, K. U. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121(46)
19. Neta, P., Huie, R. E., and Ross, A. B. (1988) J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 17(3), 1027-1284
20. Adams, G. E., Aldrich, J. E., Bisby, R. H., Cundall, R. B., Redpath, J. L., and Willson, R. L.
(1972) Radiat. Res. 49(2), 278-289
21. Chen, S.-N., and Hoffman, M. Z. (1973) Radiat. Res. 56(1), 40-47
22. Baverstock, K. F., Cundall, R. B., Adams, G. E., and Redpath, J. L. (1974) Int. J. Radiat.
Biol. 26(1)
23. Yermilov, V., Yoshie, Y., Rubio, J., and Ohshima, H. (1996) FEBS Lett. 399(1-2), 67-70
24. Tretyakova, N. Y., Burney, S., Pamir, B., Wishnok, J. S., Dedon, P. C., Wogan, G. N., and
Tannenbaum, S. R. (2000) Mutat Res 447(2), 287-303
25. Tretyakova, N. Y., Wishnok, J. S., and Tannenbaum, S. R. (2000) Chem. Res. Toxicol.
21 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
13(7), 658-664
26. Burney, S., Niles, J. C., Dedon, P. C., and Tannenbaum, S. R. (1999) Chem. Res. Toxicol.
12(6), 513-520
27. Shafirovich, V., Dourandin, A., Huang, W., Luneva, N. P., and Geacintov, N. E. (1999) J.
Phys. Chem. B 103(49), 10924-10933
28. Shafirovich, V., Dourandin, A., Huang, W., Luneva, N. P., and Geacintov, N. E. (2000)
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2(19), 4399-4408
29. Shafirovich, V., Cadet, J., Gasparutto, D., Dourandin, A., and Geacintov, N. E. (2001) Chem.
Res. Toxicol. 13, (accepted)
30. Shafirovich, V., Cadet, J., Gasparutto, D., Dourandin, A., Huang, W., and Geacintov, N. E.
(2001) J. Phys. Chem. B 105(2), 586-592
31. Dogliotti, L., and Hayon, E. (1967) J. Phys. Chem. 71(8), 2511-2516
32. Huie, R. E., and Clifton, C. L. (1990) J. Phys. Chem. 94(23), 8561-8567
33. Ivanov, K. L., Glebov, E. M., Plyusnin, V. F., Ivanov, Y. V., Grivin, V. P., and Bazhin, N.
M. (2000) J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 133(1-2), 99-104
34. Candeias, L. P., and Steenken, S. (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111(3), 1094-1099
35. Steenken, S., and Jovanovic, S. V. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119(3), 617-618
36. Steenken, S., Jovanovic, S. V., Bietti, M., and Bernhard, K. (2000) J. Am. Chem. Soc.
122(10), 2373-2374.
37. O’Neill, P., and Davies, S. E. (1987) Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 52(4),
577-87
38. Bachler, V., and Hildenbrand, K. (1992) Radiat. Phys. Chem. 40(1), 59-68
22 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
39. Wing, R., Drew, H., Takano, T., Broka, C., Tanaka, S., Itakura, K., and Dickerson, R. E.
(1980) Nature 287(5784), 755-8
40. Drew, H. R., Wing, R. M., Takano, T., Broka, C., Tanaka, S., Itakura, K., and Dickerson, R.
E. (1981) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78(4), 2179-83
41. Patel, D. J., Kozlowski, S. A., Marky, L. A., Broka, C., Rice, J. A., Itakura, K., and
Breslauer, K. J. (1982) Biochemistry 21(3), 428-36
42. Patel, D. J., Pardi, A., and Itakura, K. (1982) Science 216(4546), 581-90
43. Law, S. W., Eritja, R., Goodman, M. F., and Breslauer, K. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35(38),
12329-12337
44. McElroy, W. J. (1990) J. Phys. Chem. 94(6), 2435-2441
45. Lymar, S. V., Schwarz, H. A., and Czapski, G. (2000) Radiat. Phys. Chem. 59(4), 387-392
46. Czapski, G., Lymar, S. V., and Schwarz, H. A. (1999) J. Phys. Chem. A 103(18), 3447-3450
47. Lilie, J., Hanrahan, R. J., and Henglein, A. (1978) Radiat. Phys. Chem. 11(5), 225-227.
48. Hildenbrand, K., and Schulte-Frohlinde, D. (1990) Free Radic. Res. Commun. 11(4-5),
195-206
49. Schiemann, O., Turro, N. J., and Barton, J. K. (2000) J. Phys. Chem. B 104(30), 7214-7220
50. Burrows, C. J., and Muller, J. G. (1998) Chem. Rev. 98(3), 1109-1151
51. Huie, R. E., Clifton, C. L., and Neta, P. (1991) Radiat. Phys. Chem. 38(5), 477-481
52. (1984) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th Ed. (Weast, R. C., Ed.), CRC Press,
Boka Raton, Florida
53. Shafirovich, V. Y., Courtney, S. H., Ya, N., and Geacintov, N. E. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc.
117(17), 4920-4929
23 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
54. Jonsson, M., Lind, J., Merényi, G., and Eriksen, T. E. (1995) J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2
(1), 67-70
55. Kuzmin, V. A., Dourandin, A., Shafirovich, V., and Geacintov, N. E. (2000) Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2(7), 1531-1535
56. Schindler, S. C., Edward W., Jr.; Creutz, Carol; Sutin, Norman. (1993) Inorg. Chem. 32(20),
4200-4208
57. Shafirovich, V., Dourandin, A., Luneva, N. P., and Geacintov, N. E. (2000) J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 2 (2), 271-275
58. Bielski, B. H. J. (1978) Photochem. Photobiol. 28(4-5), 645-649
59. Candeias, L. P., and Steenken, S. (2000) Chem. Eur. J. 6(3), 475-484
60. Al-Sheikhly, M. (1994) Radiat. Phys. Chem. 44(3), 297-301
61. Weiss, S. J. (1989) N Engl J Med 320(6), 365-76
62. Hurst, J. K., and Barrette, W. C., Jr. (1989) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24(4), 271-328
63. Nathan, C., and Shiloh, M. U. (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(16), 8841-8
64. Cadet, J., Delatour, T., Douki, T., Gasparutto, D., Pouget, J. P., Ravanat, J. L., and Sauvaigo,
S. (1999) Mutat Res 424(1-2), 9-21
65. Lymar, S. V., and Hurst, J. K. (1995) Chem Res Toxicol 8(6), 833-40
66. Wolcott, R. G., Franks, B. S., Hannum, D. M., and Hurst, J. K. (1994) J Biol Chem 269(13),
9721-8
67. Sankarapandi, S., and Zweier, J. L. (1999) J Biol Chem 274(3), 1226-32
68. MacMicking, J., Xie, Q. W., and Nathan, C. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 323-350
69. Galea, E., and Feinstein, D. L. (1999) FASEB J. 13(15), 2125-2137
24 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
70. Beckman, J. S., Beckman, T. W., Chen, J., Marshall, P. A., and Freeman, B. A. (1990) Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 87(4), 1620-4
71. Huie, R. E., and Padmaja, S. (1993) Free Radic Res Commun 18(4), 195-9
72. Kissner, R., Nauser, T., Bugnon, P., Lye, P. G., and Koppenol, W. H. (1997) Chem Res
Toxicol 10(11), 1285-92
73. Merenyi, G., and Lind, J. (1997) Chem Res Toxicol 10(11), 1216-20
74. Altman, P. L., and Dittmer, D. S. (1971) Blood and Other Body Fluids, Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology Press, Bethesda
25 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
Footnotes
§This work has been supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant CHE-9700429
and by a grant from the Kresge Foundation.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Chemistry Department and Radiation and
Solid State Laboratory, 31 Washington Place, New York University, New York, New York
10003-5180. Tel.: (212) 998 8456; Fax: (212) 998 8421; e-mail: [email protected]
1 The abbreviations used are: CO3. ,̄ carbonate radical anion; HCO3-, bicarbonate anion; 8-
oxo-dG, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2’-deoxyguanosine; ONOOCO2-, nitrosoperoxycarbonate anion;
ONOO-, peroxynitrite; SO4.- sulfate radical; S2O82-, persulfate; 8-nitro-G, 8-nitroguanine;
8-nitro-dG, 8-nitro-2’-deoxyguanosine; G, guanine; dG, 2’-deoxyguanosine; dGMP, 2’-
deoxyguanosine 5’-monophospate; Fpg, formamidopyrimidine glycosylase; .NO, nitric oxide.
26 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
Figure Legends
Figure 1. Kinetics of oxidation of guanine in the duplex d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT) (50
µM) by CO3.- radicals in air-equilibrated buffer solution containing 25 mM S2O82- and 300 mM
HCO3- ions (pH 7.5). The CO3.- radicals were indirectly generated (see text) by SO4.-
radicals obtained by the photolysis of S2O82- with 308 nm excimer laser pulses (~70
mJ/pulse/cm2, full width at half maximum = 12 ns). The transient absorption spectra were
recorded at various delay times (∆t) after the excitation. The 600 nm maximum is due to CO3.-
radical anions, and the 315 nm maximum to G(-H). radicals. The lines are shown for
visualization only.
Figure 2. Dependence of the rate constant, k5’, characterizing the decay of CO3.- radical
anions, on the concentration of the self-complementary d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT) duplex in
27 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
air-equilibrated buffer solutions (pH 7.5) containing 25 mM S2O82- and 300 mM HCO3-. The
solid line represents a least-squares, best linear fit to the k5’ data points, each of which
represents an average of 5 individual laser flash photolysis experiments.
Figure 3. Decay kinetics of the 315 nm absorbance of the guanine radicals, G(-H)., in the
self-complementary duplex d(AACGCGAATTCGCGTT) (100 µM) in 25 mM S2O82- and
300 mM HCO3- buffer solution, following excitation with a 308 nm excimer laser pulse (~ 70
mJ/pulse/cm2, fwhm ~ 12 ns).
Figure 4. Gel electrophoresis patterns of irradiated, hot-piperidine oligonucleotide strands.
Autoradiograph of a denaturating gel (7 M urea, 20% polyacrylamide gel) showing the cleavage
patterns induced by 308 nm excimer laser pulse excitation (20 mJ/pulse/cm2, 10 Hz) of the 5’-
32P-end-labeled d(AACG1CG2AATTCG3CG4TT) strands in the duplex form (10 µM) in air-
equilibrated buffer solutions (pH 7.5) containing 10 mM S2O82- and 300 mM HCO3-. After
the irradiation, the oligonucleotide solutions were treated with hot piperidine (1M, 90 oC) for 30
min and loaded onto a polyacrylamide gel. Panel A: Lane G: Maxam-Gilbert G sequencing
reaction. Lane 1: Unirradiated duplex (without piperidine treatment); Lane 2: Unirradiated
duplex (after hot piperidine treatment); Lanes 3 and 5 (integrated dosage received by the sample,
0.5 and 4 J/cm2, respectively): Irradiated duplex (without piperidine treatment); Lanes 4 and 6
28 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
(integrated dosage received by the sample, 0.5 and 4 J/cm2, respectively): Irradiated duplex
(after hot piperidine treatment). Panel B: Histogram obtained by scanning the autoradiogram
(lane 4, 0.5 J/cm2): hot piperidine cleavage patterns at the different guanine sites G1, G2, G3,
and G4 in the irradiated, self-complementary 5’- 32P end-labeled
d(AACG1CG2AATTCG3CG4TT) duplex. Panel C: Total fraction of strands cleaved at the dosage of 4 J/cm2,
fraction of fragments cleaved at all G, C, A, and T sites in the self-complementary duplex (from
lane 6). The error bars show the standard deviations of the cleavage patterns (Panels B and C)
obtained in 3 different photocleavage experiments.
Table. 1. Oxidation of the d(AACG1CG2AATTCG3CG4TT) duplex by CO3.- radicals in
aqueous buffer solutions (pH 7.5). Reaction schemes and rate constants.
No Reaction k (M-1s-1) Ref
1S2O82- + hν → 2 SO4.- λ308 = 0.55 (33)
29 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
2SO4.- + SO4.- → S2O82- k2 = (1.1±0.1)×109
k2 = 1.35×109
this work
(33)
3SO4.- + HCO3- → SO42- + CO3.-
k3 = (4.6±0.5)×106
k3 = 9.1×106
k3 = 2.8×106
this work
(31)
(32)
4CO3.- + CO3.- → CO42- + CO2 k4 = (1.3±0.1)×107
k4 = 2×107
this work
(45)
5a CO3.- + d[G-oligo] → CO32- + d[G(-H).-
oligo]
k5 = (1.9±0.2)×107this work
6a CO3.- + dGMP → CO32- + dGMP(-H). k6 = (6.6±0.7)×107this work
7b CO3.- + dAMP → k7 ≤ 2.8×106this work
8b CO3.- + dCMP → k8 ≤ 1.9×106this work
9a CO3.- + dTMP → k9 ≤ 1.7×106this work
10a CO3.- + 8-oxo-dG → CO32- + 8-oxo-G(-H). k10 = (7.9±0.8)×108this work
30 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
11b SO4.- + d[G-oligo] → SO42- + d[G(-H).-
oligo]
k11 = (9.5±0.9)×109this work
a) The reactions were monitored spectroscopically via the decay of CO3.- (600 nm) and
SO4.- (445 nm) radicals and the concomitant formation of the product radicals, G(-H). (315
nm) and 8-oxo-G(-H). (320 nm). b) The reactions were monitored by the accelerated decay of
CO3.- (600 nm) and SO4.- (445 nm) radicals in the presence of the indicated substrate
molecules.
31 by guest on February 12, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
Vladimir Shafirovich, Alexander Dourandin, Weidong Huang and Nicholas E Geacintovoligonucleotides
The carbonate radical is a site-selective oxidizing agent of guanine in double-stranded
published online April 24, 2001J. Biol. Chem.
10.1074/jbc.M101131200Access the most updated version of this article at doi:
Alerts:
When a correction for this article is posted•
When this article is cited•
to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alertsClick here
by guest on February 12, 2018http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from