the case of flooding … waiting for godot? stuart n. lane institute for hazard and risk research...

16
The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University [email protected] Acknowledgements: Funding: NERC, RELU, Environment Agency Research: Chris Brookes, Nick Odoni

Post on 19-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

The case of flooding … waiting for Godot?

Stuart N. LaneInstitute for Hazard and Risk ResearchDurham University

[email protected]

Acknowledgements: Funding: NERC, RELU, Environment AgencyResearch: Chris Brookes, Nick Odoni

Page 2: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

??

?

?

??

?

?

? ??

?

Page 3: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Some direction

1. The process: attenuation

2. Land management impacts on attenuation

3. Five critical lessons

4. Some implications

Page 4: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Attenuation: a basic but critical process

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Time (minutes) from 00:00 25th June 2007

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Gauged rain rate (mm/15 min)

Radar rain rate (mm/15 min)

Flow (cumecs) at Ings Bridge,Pickering

Page 5: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Attenuation and using the land to reduce flood risk

1. The partitioning of rainfall between rapid routes (commonly overland flow) and slow routes (commonly sub surface flow)

Source: Valerie Martin, Findon, West Sussex

‘Much of the hillside to the north had been ploughed and was not yet planted with crops and the top surface (with no roots to hold it) was swept away in a freak mud slide into the village. I wonder if this muddy mess would have happened if the fields had been able to hold the moisture as in the past when the hillsides were covered with the traditional downland grass.’

Page 6: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Attenuation and using the land to reduce flood risk

• But human activities can reduce rapid runoff generation

1945 to 1965

Page 7: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Attenuation and using the land to reduce flood risk

2. Storage of water in floodplains where flooding is permissible

Beckenham Marshes, River Trent, Acknowl. Joe Morris, Cranfield

Page 8: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Attenuation and using the land to reduce flood risk

• But storage needs careful design

Acknowl.: Joe Morris, Cranfield UniversityAcknowl.: Joe Morris, Cranfield University

Defence top

River bank top

Page 9: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Attenuation and using the land to reduce flood risk

3. The connectivity of water from hillslopes to floodplains

AB

Wat

er le

vel (

m)

Time

Page 10: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

Land Management

Change

Flood magnitude and

frequency

The Flood system

Land Management Activity (e.g.

livestock, arable)

Land Preparation (e.g. under-drainage)

Husbandry and cropping practice (e.g.

timing, intensity, rotation)

Catchment context (e.g. soil and rainfall

characteristics)

Catchment structure (e.g. drainage

density, location)

Rainfall partitioning

effects

Runoff timing effects

Runoff routing effects

Catchment arrangement (in relation to

precipitation gradients, other sub-catchments)

Upstream conveyance

Local conveyance

Rainfall amount, seasonal distribution

and intensity

Weather type and tracking of weather

systems

Three critical lessons

1. The same land management impact can have different effects

2. Impact depends upon location in the catchment

3. Impacts depend upon the spatio-temporal evolution of a rainfall event.

Page 11: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

A broader perspective

1. Science, upscaling and indeterminacy

2. Governance

3. Equivalence

4. Rural landscapes as inhabited landscapes

5. Expertise

Page 12: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

The indeterminacy of hydrological models

1. knowledge of critical boundary conditions.2. the unresolvability of different model configurations often bound up

with severe uncertainty in model predictions. 3. the failure of models to ‘travel’ beyond the specific places or time

periods for which they have been developed and parameterised. 4. the lack of agreement over what constitutes a reasonable set of

model predictions. 5. the inadequacy of the measurements available to resolve different

model formulations.

• Hubris in our understanding of what constitutes a valid model (e.g. Environment Agency, 2007, Delivery of Making Space for Water: HA6 Catchment Scale Land-Use Management; HA7 Land Management Practices – Interim Report)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Apr-75 Oct-80 Mar-86 Sep-91 Mar-97 Sep-02

Date

Per

iod

to n

ext s

amp

le (d

ays) When this stage recorder had its paper changed

has more to do with political and economic processes than it has to do with scientific good practice

Page 13: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

A broader perspective

1. Science, upscaling and indeterminacy

2. Governance

3. Equivalence

4. Rural landscapes as inhabited landscapes

5. Expertise

Increasing scientific certainty. Increasing response reliability

Simplified governance

Diffuse Concentrated

Downstream

Source

Lowland wetland and floodplain

storage

Detention ponds and bunds

Upland wetland and floodplain storage

Changing agricultural practice

Field drainage to increase storage

Afforestation

Buffer strips and buffering zones

Management of hillslope

connectivity

Channel maintenance

Channel realignment

Page 14: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

A broader perspective

1. Science, upscaling and indeterminacy

2. Governance

3. Equivalence

4. Rural landscapes as inhabited landscapes

5. Expertise?

?

?

?

??

??

?

?

Page 15: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

A broader perspective

1. Science, upscaling and indeterminacy

2. Governance

3. Equivalence

4. Rural landscapes as inhabited landscapes

5. Expertise

Page 16: The case of flooding … waiting for Godot? Stuart N. Lane Institute for Hazard and Risk Research Durham University s.n.lane@durham.ac.uk Acknowledgements:

A broader perspective

1. Science, upscaling and indeterminacy

2. Governance

3. Equivalence

4. Rural landscapes as inhabited landscapes

5. Expertise

Non-certified Expert Knowledge (local people) Certified Expert Knowledge (scientist)

CG1: ‘Because of course it depends where you are, because if you are closer to the main channel, you have got something rushing really fast. But the rest of it is spreading out … it doesn’t tend to be moving at great speeds, it is just sort of spreading out.’

The depth dependence of frictional resistance in river floodplain flows, The assumption that is central to the diffusion wave approximation of the 2D shallow water equations

CG2: ‘Logic says that you have got to work out the contours and work out which is the lowest lying land. I suppose there must be some sort of formula to work out exactly the volume of water you are expecting to come down and therefore to what volume it will fill that level.’

Potential energy as a momentum source coupled to the principle of volume conservation for an incompressible fluid

CG2: ‘But Pickering is a slower process I think than Sinnington is. And it is not such a sudden thing. I mean you can see Sinnington rising. I don’t think you can here so much. [because] Pickering Beck goes much further north, and it is gathering more water.’

Hydrograph attenuation

CG2: ‘The other thing that is important is that we have got heavy clay soil. But the soils vary in different parts, whereas of course the clay soil around Great Baugh means that other areas are more sandy perhaps and drain more easily.

Infiltration and runoff generation as controlled by soil type

CG3: ‘So to protect Pickering, the nearer the dams are to Pickering the better?’ [Local member 1] ‘Well yes certainly’ (Local member 2]

Design of flood storage schemes to remove flood wave peaks

1.Ignore it, but be subject to it2.Work with it