the civil rights movement. background history plessy v. ferguson (1896) declared “separate but...

Download The Civil Rights Movement. Background History Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) declared “separate but equal” does not violate 14 th Amendment - Jim Crow Laws

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: jewel-jacobs

Post on 30-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Report

Download

Embed Size (px):

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896

Housing and School Segregation. Desegregation: Some History Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): segregated schools were equal Brown v. the Board of Education (1954):

Ch. 16.The Civil Rights Movement (1954-1968). In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled segregation was constitutional in Plessy vs. Ferguson, establishing the

Desegregation ► Brown vs. Board of Ed (1954) ► Bottom Line Overturned Plessy vs Ferguson (1896) that said separate but equal. Said segregation was unconstitutional

Megan Tessier Chelsea Finch Laura Gillie. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

mrdemarcoshistory.weebly.commrdemarcoshistory.weebly.com/.../plessy_v_ferguson__worksheet_.pdf · Legality of Segregation by Race Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896 Of Case ... Explain how

Civil Rights Era Chapter 21. Segregation Plessy v. Ferguson –“separate but equal” law did not violate the 14 th Amendment Jim Crow laws –Aimed at separating

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) The object of the [14 th ] amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two

Plessy v. Dred Ferguson (1896) - Mr. Tomecko - Homemrtomecko.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/2/9/13292665/plessy_dbq.pdf · Dred Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) TEACHING TIPS Document Based Question

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) - DRMA Social Studiesdrmasocialstudies.weebly.com/uploads/4/8/9/3/48932813/... · 2018. 11. 5. · Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Name: Reading Breaking the Rules

Civil Rights. Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 Supreme Court ruled “separate but equal” facilities did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Set precedent for

WAS THE LARGEST ECONOMICALLYsouthernstudies.olemiss.edu/projects/farish-street... · Blues scholar Scott Barretta writes that “much of ... after Reconstruction, the 1896 Plessy

Chapter 21 Civil Rights. Section One: Taking on Segregation The SET-UP 1896: Plessy vs. Ferguson- “separate but equal” does not violate the 14 th Amendment

Racial segregation in United States was due to Plessy vs. Ferguson Plessy vs. Ferguson stated that the doctrine, separate but equal, did not violate

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896. Explain how the Supreme Court justified the practice of segregating railroad passengers in Louisiana by race. The majority opinion

PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) EQUAL PROTECTION AND AFFIRMATIVE ... · FERGUSON (1896) EQUAL PROTECTION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Case Background ... termed Jim Crow laws. These policies

Plessy v. Dred Ferguson (1896) - Perry Local Schoolsperrylocal.org/nettleton/files/2014/08/PlessyPDF.pdf · Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, 1787 The Constitution

U.S. HISTORY MRS. TOTH. * 1896 PLESSY V. FERGUSON- * SEPARATE BUT EQUAL * DID NOT VIOLATE 14 TH AMENDMENT * JIM CROW LAWS- * FORBADE MARRIAGE BLACK/WHITE

The Civil Rights Era CHA3U. Brown v. Board of Education Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) est. legality of “separate but equal schools” NAACP lawyer Thurgood

Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896

1896: Plessy v Ferguson In 1892 Homer Plessy, who was classified as an African American, was arrested, out on trial and found guilty of violating state

Test Review What 1896 Supreme Court decision made segregation legal and established the principle of “separate but equal?” Plessy v. Ferguson

Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896 “ Separate But Equal ” Power point created by Robert L. Martinez Primary Content: The Americans

starter activity In 1896 the court case ‘Plessy v Ferguson’ upheld segregation if it was ‘separate but equal’ Compare these segregated schools in the

Chapter 29: Civil Rights. The Segregation System 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson ruling: “separate but equal” 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson ruling: “separate but equal”

DE-SEGREGATION Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 Separate but equal Developing Civil Rights Movement WWII Armed Forces NAACP Thurgood Marshall Brown v

The Struggle for Civil Rights. Plessy v. Ferguson- 1896 “Separate But Equal Doctrine”“Separate But Equal Doctrine” Made African-Americans 2 nd class citizensMade

Civil Rights Mrs. Saunders. Civil Rights Plessy v. Ferguson - the Supreme Court ruled in 1896 that “separate but equal” facilities did not violate the

Chapter 29 Civil Rights. I.Taking on Segregation A. Civil Rights Act of 1875 declared unconstitutional in 1883 B. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) makes segregation

Chapter 21 Section 1-2 CIVIL RIGHTS 1950’S-60’S. Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 Separate but equal did not violate 14 th amendment Jim Crow Laws = Separating

CELEBRATION OF LEARNINGportfolioofmrjones.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/8/8/19884163… · Web viewThe Plessy v. Ferguson ruling of 1896 established that laws segregating African Americans

PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) - Online Campusonlinecampus.fcps.edu/media2/Social_Studies/USVA_2010/Topic16/...PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) ORIGINS OF THE CASE In 1892, Homer Plessy took a

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) - Mr. Buck Civics Blog · 2018. 11. 5. · Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Name: Reading Breaking the Rules You may have heard the saying, “Some rules are meant

Civil rights Movementharrellshistory.us › USHistory › 29.pdfCivil rights Movement American Visions Chapter 29 1954-1968 The Beginnings •Plessy case 1896 •Legal segregation