the common challenges of common practices: tips for effectively moving to a shared services center
DESCRIPTION
Moving to a shared services model reduces costs and optimizes performance, but taking the right steps is necessary for a successful outcome. Explore the initiatives and challenges of a common chart of accounts and calendar for companies moving toward enterprise-wide shared service center operations. We will focus on how standardizing the data streamlines business processes, eliminates silos and facilitates the new functionality of Release 12. Case studies that discuss best practices and impact will be shared. Website: www.eprentise.com Twitter: @eprentise Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+Eprentise/posts Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/eprentiseTRANSCRIPT
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
The Common Challenges of Common Practices: Tips for Effectively Moving to a Shared Services Center Helene Abrams
CEO eprentise
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives After completion of this program you will be able to:
Objective 1: Learn the mechanics of running a single global instance in a shared services center operation.
Objective 2: Understand common business processes and how they are implemented.
Objective 3: Explore real-world examples of and lessons learned from shared service center operations.
| 2
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Agenda Introduction
What is a Shared Services Center?
How Shared Services Centers Operate
Common Challenges
Critical Success Factors for Gaining Efficiencies and Streamlining Operations
Roadmap for Implementation
Case Studies
Conclusion
| 3
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
eprentise Can… …So Our Customers Can: Consolidate Multiple EBS Instances Change Underlying Structures and
Configurations Chart of Accounts, Other Flexfields Inventory Organizations Operating Groups, Legal Entities,
Ledgers Calendars Costing Methods
Resolve Duplicates, Change Sequences, IDs
Separate Data
: Transformation Software for E-Business Suite
Reduce Operating Costs and Increase Efficiencies Shared Services Data Centers
Adapt to Change Align with New Business Initiatives Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures Pattern-Based Strategies
Make ERP an Adaptive Technology
Avoid a Reimplementation Reduce Complexity and Control Risk Improve Business Continuity, Service
Quality and Compliance Establish Data Quality Standards and a
Single Source of Truth
Company Overview: Incorporated 2007 Helene Abrams, CEO
| 4
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
What is a Shared Services Center?
An operational entity which performs all of the non-core business processes for all of the divisions within an enterprise so that companies can:
• Focus on core business competencies
• Reduce costs and gain economies of scale
• Standardize business processes
• Implement better controls
Provisioning of services by one part of the organization and its shared use by the rest, who fund this service.
| 5
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Incentives & Drivers of Global Operations Consolidate repetitive data-centric processes to support migration to a shared services center or a centralized data center
Generate financial reports directly from the system of record
Reduce operating and maintenance costs to improve the bottom line
Create a single source of truth to improve business processes and business intelligence
Enable revenue optimization whenever and wherever possible to improve the top line
Capitalize on enterprise-wide synergies to leverage purchasing and to better understand customers
Obtain access to new markets and the opportunity to scale the business
| 6
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
How Shared Services Centers Operate Select locations with lower labor costs, different time zones
Operates as a separate profit center Transaction processing is the main revenue generator, not a support
function.
Recognizes economies of scale High volume of transactions
Ability to transact across businesses
Accommodates local and statutory requirements
Centralizes expertise in various areas
| 7
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Example Shared Services Center Functions
| 8
AP Invoicing Purchasing Credit Card Reconciliation Warranty Tracking
Procurement
General Accounting Billing Credit and Collections Taxes Statutory Reporting Travel & Expenses
Finance
Payroll Processing Benefit Management Time and Labor Reporting
HR and Payroll
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
R12 Was Designed for Shared Service Center Operations
Operating Units (OUs)
Responsibilities
Multiple Organizations Access Control
Subledger Accounting
Subledger Users are assigned responsibilities
Ledger Sets
Legal Entities
Customer and supplier bank accounts
| 9
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Common Challenges for Shared Service Center Operations Global Standardization Data
Common Definitions Redundancy
Business Processes
Localizations Alignment of business initiatives Governance, Controls Increasing Costs Global Support Downtime
| 10
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Global Standardization
Business and implementation differences exist among different installations and need to be maintained
Different calendars, currencies, and charts of accounts are difficult to reconcile
One-to one relationship between each set of subledgers (purchasing, payables) in Oracle Applications
No cross-instance functionality
MOAC functionality doesn’t enforce standards
Oracle Applications consolidate only at General Ledger Level
| 11
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Business Process Standardization Key components to successfully managing change on a global scale
| 12
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Critical Success Factors for Gaining Efficiencies and Streamlining Operations
Single Global Instance
Common Global Chart of Accounts
Standard Calendar
Shared Master Data
Common Configurations
Elimination of Silos Ledgers, Legal Entities, Operating Units, Inventory Orgs
| 13
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Things to Think About When Establishing a Vision for Shared Services
What is the governance model?
What type of functions, processes and services?
How many processes ?
What is our approach?
What are the economics?
How long will it take?
What type of culture and organization do we want?
How will it impact the rest of the organization?
How will it meet stakeholder’s requirements and be measured?
| 14
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Three Traditional Shared Services Organization Models
Corporate Service Center
B.U. B.U. B.U.
Regional Service Center
B.U. B.U.
Regional Service Center
B.U. B.U.
Company
A/P “Center of Excellence”
B.U.
Corporate Accounting
“Center of Excellence”
Company
B.U.
Corporate
| 15
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Roadmap for Implementation
Step 1: Determine what processes the SSC will cover Identify processes and data that can be shared across
the enterprise Standardize common business processes, workflows
Identify common data
| 16
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Roadmap for Implementation
Step 2: Measure Current Operating Costs Benchmark existing processes
Identify metrics for best practices
Compare existing to best practices
Determine opportunities for saving
| 17
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Determine Current Practices and Costs
| 18
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Measure Against Best Industry Practices
Benchmark High Benchmark Median CCI w/o TGIF & CHG $1.81 Benchmark Low Best Practice
CHG $4.40 TGIF $4.12 CCI $2.39 CTG $1.74# CMG $1.69#
Accounts Payable Cost per Invoice Processed
$16.63
$3.93
$1.35
$0.80
Benchmark Low Benchmark Median CCI w/o TGIF & CHG 30,575 Benchmark High
CHG 11,303 TGIF 14,562 CCI 23,765 CMG 36,181**# CTG 53,148**#
Invoices Processed per Accounts Payable FTE
5,333
17,793
41,388
* Per 1991 Shared Service Study ** Invoices are processed by CCI FTEs which are not reflected in CTG and CMG headcounts # Business units receive a bill from CCI A/P in addition to performing some of their own A/P
Unit Cost and Productivity Comparison Accounts Payable
| 19
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Resource Distribution
Other (13%)
Personnel (64%)
Systems (23%)
Benchmark Low
Company ABC
Other (24%)
Personnel (64%)
Systems (19%)
Personnel
Systems
Other
TGIF
61%
22%
17%
CMG
61%
21%
18%
CHG
63%
1%
36%
CTG
48%
14%
38%
Headcount Distribution
Exempt (20%)
Non-Exempt (80%)
Benchmark Low
Company ABC
Exempt (29%)
Non-Exempt (66%)
Contract (5%)
Exempt
Non-Exempt
Contract
TGIF
10%
84%
6%
CMG
37%
54%
9%
CHG
41%
59%
0%
CTG
51%
49%
0%
| 20
Measure Against Best Industry Practices Accounts Payable Supplemental Analysis Accounts Payable
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Roadmap for Implementation Step 3: Set up a Service Level Agreement Identify resources
People Infrastructure
Determine operating costs What volume can you handle? Are there special requirements? Determine unit prices
Determine service levels and fees Timing (close cycle) Volume
Develop change management, issue resolution, and escalation processes
| 21
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Roadmap for Implementation
Step 4: Initiate Preparation Project Set up infrastructure
Consolidate instances
Implement common chart of accounts
Implement common calendar
Merge ledgers, operating units, inventory orgs
Set up secondary ledgers and ledger sets
Regulatory and Statutory Reporting
Adjusting Ledgers
Set up MOAC
| 22
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Infrastructure Four main technology issues surrounding globalization:
Availability
Access/Security
Performance
Functionality
E-Business Suite Release 12 is designed to support a global enterprise within a single instance, and it has several features that enable sharing of data and facilitate the globalization effort.
| 23
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Technology - Availability Prearranged level of operational performance during a period of time Service level agreement or “three nines”/”five nines” To a user, it means the ability of the user community to access
the system Scheduled vs. Unscheduled downtime Maintenance Patches, configuration changes, etc. (reboot required) Hardware/software failure Environment anomaly
| 24
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Example of Silos Instance A B C D Distinct
Release 11.5.10.2 11.5.10 11.5.10.2 11.5.9 -
Size (GB) 1,425 548 61 96 -
Languages 4 2 1 1 4
Sets of Books 104 48 1 30 183
Calendars 10 7 1 1 19
Charts of Accounts 40 43 1 18 102
Legal Entities 120 48 0 47 215
Operating Units 121 49 0 47 217
Inv Orgs 137 50 1 48 236
Modules Installed 9 17 4 5 21
Security Rules on Value Set 13,012 300 15 153 13,480
Security Rules X Responsibilities 17,350 445 6 75 17,876
Cross Validation Rules 86,845 39,925 25 165 126,960
Currencies 56 28 1 28 64
EBS Users 43,986 30,494 247 3,023 N/A
Sets of Books, Legal Entities, OUs, and Inventory Orgs
Redundant and configured differently Charts of Accounts and Calendars
Disparate and misaligned
Sets of Books – Difficult to comply with local and statutory regulatory requirements
Legal Entities – Easy to over- or under-pay taxes and misstate financial information
Operating Units – Difficult to leverage supplier relationships (terms, discounts, etc.)
Inventory Orgs – Impossible to know if a product is actually in stock (or where it is on the shelf)
Charts of Accounts – Reports and data extracts must be done 40 times
Calendars – With 10 calendars, the company is depreciating assets in 10 different ways and closing periods at different times Redundant Objects
Redundant Objects
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Why Consolidate Instances? Reduction in infrastructure costs (hardware, maintenance, licenses)
Reduction in personnel to support multiple systems
Provision of better customer service and the ability to operate globally
Agility to grow and to embrace new initiatives
Global Reporting/ Analytics
Facilitate efficient and effective decision making with timely and reliable fact based information
Access real-time information at consolidated level
Create Centralized Shared Services (maintenance, setup, centralized processing)
Eliminate duplicate integrations and interfaces
Lower license and support fees
Operation of a single business with consistent data, streamlined processing and the ability to leverage markets, suppliers of other parts of the business
Consistent Business Processes
| 26
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
eprentise Consolidation Software
| 27
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Changes Made Automatically During Consolidation
Three Types of Changes:
Name Changes
ID Changes
Synchronization
| 28
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
A Global Chart of Accounts Primary ledger is single source of truth
for all accounting, reconciliation, and analytical reporting
Consistency but flexibility to accommodate different requirements
External reporting without relying on a separate financial consolidation system
Drill down to individual transactions in the subledgers without translation
Transparency (3 - 5 years) to meet IFRS standards and international auditing requirements
Common metrics and reporting structures with common interpretation
Enterprise Visibility with Subledger Accounting and Secondary Ledgers
| 29
Accounting policies are standardized across the entire enterprise Data remains consistent and
has full drill-down and roll-up capability, auditability, and visibility into all of the activity for the entire ledger set Conversions not required
for data warehouse queries Facilitates the movement to
a shared service center Increases the level of
enterprise governance and control of new code combinations
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
FlexField Software to Change your EBS Chart of Accounts
Map Segments and Values or Code Combinations
Segment Mapping Changes CCID everywhere
All setups All subledgers All history Looks as though the new chart of accounts was part of the original implementation Full audit trail, drill down, roll up Built in exception reporting
1 1 Mapping
M 1 Mapping
1 M Mapping
| 30
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Calendar Change
| 31
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Period Date Change - Impact on Journals
| 32
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Insert New Dates
| 33
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Merge Operating Units
| 34
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Move Legal Entities to New Set of Books
| 35
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Roadmap for Implementation
Step 5: Roll out SSC Operations Establish standard business processes
Set up governance and compliance controls
Hire resources
Develop training program
| 36
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Process Standardization The backbone of a globalization effort is the understanding that business processes are intrinsically linked and not confined to departmental, geographic, or organizational boundaries.
Shared services center as a way to standardize on common “global” processes such as: Corporate treasury Invoice processing Receivables processing Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Account maintenance Corporate reporting Expense processing HR maintenance
Costa Mesa Kolkata
Nottingham
São Paulo
| 37
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Governance Effective management of shared enterprise assets is necessary for an effective global strategy Collaboration
Implementation of effective controls
Idea of the “benevolent dictatorship” 1. There can be no wavering about where the finish line is placed
(a single global instance)
2. Anything less than success or short of completion is not acceptable (no special exceptions)
3. Obstructionism is not tolerated
| 38
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Training and Communication
Effective globalization training has to take a more personalized approach that seeks buy-in along with providing information New skills
New processes
New functionality
New regulations
A training manual alone is not enough to be effective
| 39
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Roadmap for Implementation
Step 6: Measure Results Are you achieving the returns on investment?
How close are you to best practices?
What do you need to do to further reduce costs?
| 40
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Where Do You Fit?
Headcount and Costs
Headcount per $ Billion Sales
6.2-CTG 8.4
17.1
19.9
29.6
46.3
Cost as a Percent of Sales
Personnel .027 - CTG
.030%
0.61%
.073%
.118%
.219%
Systems
.026%
.038%
.046%
.062%
.011%
Other
.013%
.028%
.035%
.089%
.006%
.126%
.153%
.209%
.355%
First Quartile
Second Quartile
Third Quartile
Fourth Quartile
First Quartile
Second Quartile
Third Quartile
Fourth Quartile
56.5 – CMG 67.9 – TGIF 77.8 – CHG
.244% – CMG
.249% – TGIF .073% – CMG .090% – TGIF
.141% – CHG .387% – CHG .407% – TGIF
.002% - CHG
.008% - CTG
27.2 – CCI
.089% - CCI
.210% - CMG
.030% - CCI
.022% - CTG
.047%
.155% - CCI
.345% - CMG
.036% – CCI
.068% – TGIF
.062% – CHG
Accounts Payable Benchmark Results Accounts Payable
Total
.057% - CTG
| 41
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Determine Opportunities for Cost Reduction
| 42
Company ABC Company ABC
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
A Case Study on Global Finance Transformation and Operations at Experian
Globalization Best-of-breed
| 43
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Experian – Global Finance Transformation
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
US
UK France Ireland
Oracle R12
Spain Hong Kong
Ireland Australia
N.Zealand* Italy
Denmark Norway
Sweden* Finland* Estonia*
India
France Japan China Korea
Malaysia Singapore
US UK
S.Africa Russia*
Morocco*
Netherlands Germany Austria
N.Zealand** Sweden** Estonia** Bulgaria Greece Monaco Belgium
Brazil Mexico
Argentina Turkey
UK Instance - Oracle 11i
US Instance - Oracle 11i
Oracle 11i "UNIFY" Instance Single Global Instance
Oracle R12.0.6
US & UK migrated to
"UNIFY" instance
* GL Module Only ** Additional modules
Canada Chile
Costa Rica
Gemstone
Start
Gemstone
Go-live
3 EBS instances converged into a Single Global Instance
Global COA / Processes
Regional Shared Service Centers processing
Ongoing global roll out
Single Global Instance of Oracle EBS R12
Global Chart of Accounts
Standard Finance Processes
Global Finance Shared Services Organisation
Three regional Finance Shared Service Centres
Global Hyperion EPM & OBIEE fully integrated with EBS
Global Finance Center of Excellence (COE)
| 44
Project Gemstone Goals
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Experian – Global Finance Transformation
Core Financials Other HR & Payroll Purchasing Order Management HRMS
I-Procurement Advanced Pricing Self Service HR Payables Service Contracts Passive Payroll
Receivables Project Billing Payroll Advanced Collections Time & Labour Advanced Benefits
General Ledger AME Absence Management Fixed Assets BRM Billing * I-Recruitment
Cash Management Oracle GRC AGIS
I-Expenses
Note: Not all modules used by all countries
Oracle EBS – Modules implemented and planned *
| 45
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
GCS Support – Then and Now 3 Regional EBS instances. Two located in UK, one located in USA. 2 Regional support areas Functional / Development
teams in each location Break fix team in each
location Different support models in
place Knowledge base
decentralized 3 different EBS infrastructure footprints Duplicated DBA teams Strategy and Support leadership silo’d and duplicated
Consolidation project to move from 3 EBS to single global instance, infrastructure located in UK Outsourced Break/Fix support to support partner (TCS) Experian Development FTE’s
reduced Support presence included 3rd
shore (offshore center in Kolkata, India).of support to a 24x7 model Support management centralized,
global incident system implemented
Built out EBS Regression Test Bed platform Began formal Release Mgmt process to include instance and DBA resource utilization management
Outsourced Support Model transitions to Service Level Agreement (SLA) basis Formal Change Process put into effect – simple change < 10 days, Planned change > 10 days Release Management process furthered Instance refresh policy
established Configuration Mgmt
process furthered, began use of automation tool (i-setup)
EBS Support (Prior to Gemstone)
EBS Support (Gemstone Go Live)
EBS Support / Strategy (Gemstone 2yrs old)
(an Iterative Process)
| 46
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Process Collaboration – How Do We Work Together? Process Collaboration Matrix
Business Partners Global Corporate Systems Business Process Process Owner Process Sponsor GCS Process Partner /
SME GCS Technology
Partner
Business Intelligence:
Data Integration / Master Data M
anagement
/ Middlew
are:
Data Warehouse / Data Design Authority:
Order to Invoice NA: TBD NA: TBD GCS SME LATAM: TBD LATAM: TBD GCS SME UK&I / EMEA: TBD UK&I / EMEA: TBD GCS SME APAC: TBD APAC: TBD GCS SME
Invoice to Cash TBD TBD GCS SME
Recruit to Retire NA: TBD TBD GCS SME LATAM: TBD TBD GCS SME UK&I / EMEA: TBD TBD GCS SME APAC: TBD TBD GCS SME
Purchase to Pay TBD TBD GCS SME
Record to Report TBD TBD GCS SME
GRC TBD TBD GCS SME
Enterprise Performance Management TBD TBD TBD
| 47
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Customer-focused organization Establishes global processes and accessibility to data Hastens incorporation of new business units Improved access to consistent information Enhanced ability to refocus business units from transactional processing to analytical analysis Focuses on core competencies Eliminates silos, and assures that management everywhere is reading from the same page Number of control points in a process and the number of variations of a process are greatly reduced, mitigating the risk of process error. Drastic quality improvements Leverage technology Fewer customer contact points
Soft Benefits of Implementing Shared Service Centers
| 48
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved.
Questions?
| 49
© 2014 eprentise. All rights reserved. © 2013 eprentise. All rights reserved. | 50
Thank You!
- One World, One System, A Single Source of Truth -
Helene Abrams, CEO www.eprentise.com
[email protected] Visit eprentise at booth 1033!