the comparative analysis of airflow around a rocket

52
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket

Upload: courtney-bryan

Post on 04-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket. Part I: Vehicle. February 1 Begin work on full-scale vehicle and payload. February 15 Full-scale vehicle completed. February 21 First test flight of full-scale vehicle March 21 Second test flight of full-scale vehicle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket

Page 2: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 3: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• February 1 Begin work on full-scale vehicle and payload.

• February 15 Full-scale vehicle completed.• February 21 First test flight of full-scale vehicle

• March 21 Second test flight of full-scale vehicle

• April 12 Rocket ready for launch• April 16 Rocket Fair/Hardware & Safety check• April 19 SLI Launch Day

Page 4: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

1. First stage burn 2. Stage separation.3. Booster coasts to its apogee

and deploys main parachute.4. Booster lands safely5. Second stage motor burn6. Sustainer reaches apogee,

deploys drogue parachute7. Sustainer descends under

drogue parachute to 500ft 8. Main parachute deploys,

slowing rocket to safe landing speed of 15-20 fps.

9. Sustainer lands safely.

Page 5: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Stable launch of the vehicle • Target altitude of one mile reached• Smooth stage separation. • Proper deployment of all parachutes• Safe recovery of the booster and the

sustainer

Page 6: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Length 158”Diameter 6”Liftoff weight 38.0 lb.Motor K1275 Redline (54mm)

CP 117.0” (from nosetip)CG 104.26” (from nosetip)Static Margin 3.15 calibers

Page 7: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Length 94”Diameter 4”Liftoff weight 12.7 lb.Motor J540 Redline (54mm)

CP 79.6” (from nosetip)CG 59.0” (from nosetip)Static Margin 5.15 calibers

Page 8: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Letter Part Letter PartA Nosecone H Payload Bay

B Main Parachute I Payload Electronics

C Sustainer E-Bay J Drogue Parachute

D Fins K Motor Mount

E Transition L Main Parachute

F Booster E-Bay M Payload Electronics

G Fins N Motor Mount

Page 9: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Fins: 1/32” G10 fiberglass + 1/8” balsa sandwich• Body: fiberglass tubing, fiberglass couplers• Bulkheads: 1/2” plywood • Motor Mount: 54mm phenolic tubing, 1/2” plywood

centering rings • Nosecone: commercially made plastic nosecone• Rail Buttons: large size nylon buttons• Motor Retention system: Aeropack screw-on motor retainer• Anchors: 1/4” stainless steel U-Bolts• Epoxy: West System with appropriate fillers

Page 10: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 11: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 12: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 13: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 14: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Booster SustainerFlight Stability Static Margin

3.15 5.15

Thrust to Weight Ratio 6.27 8.88

Velocity at Launch Guide Departure:

54 mph(launch rail length 144”)

Page 15: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Wp - ejection charge weight in pounds. dP - ejection charge pressure, 15psiV - free volume in cubic inches. R - combustion gas constant, 22.16 ft- lbf/lbm R for

FFFF black powder.T - combustion gas temperature, 3307 degrees R

Page 16: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Ejection charges will be verified in static testing when the vehicle is fully constructed.

Section Ejection ChargeBooster 3.0 g (of FFFF black powder)

Sustainer (Drogue) 3.0 g

Sustainer (Main) 2.2 g

Stage Separation Charge 1.0 g

Page 17: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Component Weight Parachute Diameter

Descent Rate

Booster 399 oz 92 in.(main)

17.6fps

Sustainer 211 oz 24 in.(drogue)

49.1 fps

Sustainer 211 oz 60 in.(main)

19.6 fps

Page 18: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Tested Components

• C1: Body (including construction techniques)• C2: Altimeter• C3: Data Acquisition System (custom computer board and sensors)• C4: Parachutes• C5: Fins• C6: Payload• C7: Ejection charges• C8: Launch system• C9: Motor mount• C10: Beacons• C11: Shock cords and anchors• C12: Rocket stability• C13: Second stage separation and ignition electronics/charges

Page 19: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Verification Tests• V1 Integrity Test: applying force to verify durability.• V2 Parachute Drop Test: testing parachute functionality.• V3 Tension Test: applying force to the parachute shock cords to test • durability• V4 Prototype Flight: testing the feasibility of the vehicle with a scale model.• V5 Functionality Test: test of basic functionality of a device on the ground• V6 Altimeter Ground Test: place the altimeter in a closed container and decrease air pressure to

simulate altitude changes. Verify that both the apogee and preset altitude events fire. (Estes igniters or low resistance bulbs can be used for verification).

• V7 Electronic Deployment Test: test to determine if the electronics can ignite the deployment charges.

• V8 Ejection Test: test that the deployment charges have the right amount of force to cause parachute deployment and/or planned component separation.

• V9 Computer Simulation: use RockSim to predict the behavior of the launch vehicle.• V10 Integration Test: ensure that the payload fits smoothly and snuggly into the vehicle, and is

robust enough to withstand flight stresses.

Page 20: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

V 1 V 2 V 3 V 4 V 5 V 6 V 7 V 8 V 9 V 10

C 1 P F P

C 2 F F F

C 3 P P P

C 4 F P

C 5 F P P

C 6 P P P

C 7 F P

C 8 F

C 9 F P

C 10 F

C 11 F F F

C 12 P F F

C 13 F

Page 21: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 22: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Liftoff Weight: 2850 g

• Motor: I357T, G104T

• Length: 79 inches

• Diameter: 2in to 3in

• Stability Margin (both stages): 4.16 calibers

• Stability Margin (sustainer): 6.50 calibers

Page 23: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Test dual deployment avionics

• Test full deployment scheme

• Test ejection charge calculations

• Test separation

• Test validity of simulation results

• Test rocket stability

Page 24: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Apogee: 2944 ft.– RockSim Prediction: 3110 ft.

• Time to apogee: 13 seconds

• Apogee events: drogue

• Sustainer main parachute: Unplanned non-deployment

Page 25: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Apogee: 1163 ft.

• Time to apogee: 8 seconds

• Apogee events: Main deploymentMaterial failure

Page 26: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Apogee events

Booster Main Parachute Deployment

True apogee

Page 27: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Description Initial Pointtime, altitude

End Pointtime, altitude

Descent Rate

Sustainer descent with drogue

14s, 2980ft 75s, 500ft 40.65 fps

Booster velocity at impact (material failure) 11s, 1150 ft 16s, 0ft 275fps

(not intended)

Page 28: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Recorded data

Simulation results

Apogee = 2944ft

Apogee = 3110ft

Page 29: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• The rocket is stable.

• We will be able to reach our target altitude

• Staging works

• Fiberglass is a must for construction

• Static ejection charge testing is necessary

Page 30: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket
Page 31: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The sequence of our payload as it goes from flight to the final report.

Page 32: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The payload will measure the airflow around the rocket using an array of pressure and temperature sensors.

The location of the pressure/temperature sensors are shown in red and obstacles are

shown in blue.

Page 33: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Sampling rate: 100 times per secondSampling locations: 12 on sustainer and

16 on booster

Each sensor package consists of: • one pressure sensor• one temperature sensor• analog/digital converter

Page 34: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The sensor package:

Page 35: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The "Shepherd“ (master) Propeller microcomputer drives the two “Sheep” (slave) Propeller microcomputers which collect data from sensor modules located throughout the rocket. The Shepherd Propeller also collects data from the three accelerometers and a pressure sensor.

Page 36: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

1. Shepherd instruct all Sheep to collect data 2. Each Sheep read all its sensors3. After obtaining the data, each Sheep transmits

collected data to its Shepherd4. Shepherd stores the data and repeats the process

Data Acquisition, Processing and Storage is done by linked Parallax Propeller Chips (part number P8X32A). Each Propeller chip has 8 independent cores, each core running at 80MHz.

Page 37: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The shepherd chip maintains a template in its RAM with the time stamp and a space for the temperature and the pressure data from each sensor.

Page 38: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The shepherd also gathers data from a three-axis accelerometer and a pressure sensor.

These are used to get accurate atmospheric pressure data and velocity data.

Page 39: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

The pressure/temperature sensors (2) are located on either side of the obstacle (1),

one on the fore end and two on the aft end.

2 1

Page 40: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Components

1.Pressure Sensors2.Battery Pack3.Altimeter4.3D Accelerometer5.Obstacles6.Temperature Sensors

Verification Tests

1.Drop Test2.Connection and Basic Functionality Test3.Pressure Sensor Test4.Scale Model Flight5.Temperature Sensor Test6.Durability Test7.Acceleration Test8.Battery Capacity Test

Page 41: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

P=PLANNEDF=FINISHED

T E S T S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

COMPONENTS

1 F P P

2 F P F F

3 F F F F

4 P P P

5 P P

6 F P P

Page 42: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

1. Fin2. Parachute3. Data Processing and Storage4. Motor

Fin Tab

Sensor package

Page 43: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Diagram of the sustainer showing the payload integration.

DPSUnit

TimerAlt

Sensor package

Page 44: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Diagram of the Booster showing the payload integration.

Fin Tab

Fin

Motor

Alt

Alt

Parachute

DPS&S

Page 45: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Commercially available sensors will be used

• Sensors will be calibrated

• Extensive ground testing of all electronics

Page 46: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Determine the effect of obstacles on the surface of rocket on airflow around the rocket

• Determine the accuracy of wind tunnel testing

Page 47: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Obstacles remain attached to the rocket during flight.

• Sensors will successfully collect and store measureable data during flight.

• Data collected is reliable and accurate.

Page 48: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Independent Variables– Type and location of obstacles………….…. L– Air density outside of rocket……..……..…. D– Speed of air flow…………………………………. S– Air pressure………………………………………… P– Air temperature………………………………….. T– Acceleration profile…………………………….. X,Y,Z

• Dependent Variables– Pressure at each sensor………….………….. Yi

– Temperature at each sensor…................ Ti

Page 49: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Identical rocket in wind tunnel and actual flight

• Identical obstacles on rocket in wind tunnel and actual flight

• Similar wind speeds in wind tunnel and actual flight of first stage

• Identical sensors and method of data storage

Page 50: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

• Primary correlations

– Yx = f(L) (local pressure vs. location) – Yx = f(S) (local pressure vs. airspeed) – Data from wind tunnel test and actual flight will be

compared

• Further correlations from actual flight– temperature vs. selected independent variables – pressure vs. selected independent variables

Page 51: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket

Test Measurement

Temperature

Temperature will be collected 20 times per second by the sensor array

Pressure Pressure will be collected at least 100 times per second by the sensor array

Page 52: The Comparative Analysis of  Airflow Around a Rocket