the conical flow where the energy of quenched jets go? edward shuryak (with jorge...
TRANSCRIPT
The conical flowThe conical flowWhere the energy of quenched Where the energy of quenched jets go?jets go?
Edward ShuryakEdward Shuryak(with (with Jorge Casalderrey-SolanaJorge Casalderrey-Solana,, Derek Derek Teaney)Teaney)Department of Physics and Astronomy, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University at Stony Brook NY 11794 USAUniversity at Stony Brook NY 11794 USA
Large papers are hep-ph/0602183, 0511263Large papers are hep-ph/0602183, 0511263
outlineoutline
dE/dx, jet energy loss in pQCD dE/dx, jet energy loss in pQCD and AdS/CFTand AdS/CFT
Conical flow :solutionsConical flow :solutions A growing wave as matter gets A growing wave as matter gets
diluted (adiabatic invariants)diluted (adiabatic invariants) Is it observed?Is it observed? conclusionsconclusions
Sonic boom from quenched jets Casalderrey,ES,Teaney, hep-ph/0410067; H.Stocker…
• the energy deposited by jets into strongly coupled QGP goes into conical shock waves
• Outside of a mini-fireball relativistic hydrodynamics gives the flow picture
• (If there are the start and end points, Mach cone => two spheres and a cone tangent to both)
Excitations:
• Radiative: may be large but energy in small-angle comoving gluons which are still moving relativistically => mini-fireball
• Collisional and ionization losses: produce the ``tail” of extra matter (extra entropy…)
• Hydrodynamical shocks: solution far away allows to calculate the hydro drag force F
2 Mach cones in strongly coupled plasmas(thanks to B.Jacak)
dE/dx mechanisms
• Radiative (BDMPS,Zakharov,Gyulassy,Wang…): well developed pQCD theory including LPM effect
• Collisional now included as well
But: charm RAA and v2 shows no expected reduction, why?
=> no pQCD Casimir scaling… strong coupling?
=>Medium seem to be correlated, not a free gas of light quasiparticles
QED reminder(``ionization” of new bound states in QGP?)
Calculation of the ionization rateES+Zahed, hep-ph/0406100
• Smaller than radiative loss if L>.5-1 fm
• Is there mostly near the zero binding lines,
• Thus it is different from both radiative and elastic looses, which are simply proportional to density
• Relates to non-trivial energy dependence of jet quenching (smaller at 62 and near absent at SPS)
dE/dx in GeV/fm vs T/Tc for a gluon 15,10,5 GeV. Red-elastic, black -ionization
Recent AdS/CFT applications
Herzog et al, HKKKY hep-th/0605158
v^2-1v/2^)2/(/ Tdtdp
Casalderrey and Teaney, hep/ph/0605199
TD /2•These results are related via the Einstein relation •=>AdS gravity knows about fluct.-diss. theorems!•Different coordinates:• HKKKY are in a single universe restricted by a horizon•CT bravely connected two Universes (forward and backward ones) through the black hole using the Kruskal metric/Penrose diagram
The result is in a way small but in a way large…
• If Stokes formula for drag is used the size of mini-fireball is very small
• The viscous length is much larger => ``non-hydro” core
• But jets of all energies are quenched at the sane distance
vR6/ dtdp
)2/3(^/TNgR
Ts /1
LT=m/sqrt(lambda)T= m/MeffAs anticipated by Zahed/Sin
One can get a flow picture from a graviton propagator
• Soon to be done
• As a prop. at large times/distances is sound, Mach cone shocks must be there!
flows in heavy ion collisions provide info about EoS and viscosity
• A ``Bang” was observed at RHIC
like other magnificent explosions --Supernova or Big Bang--
• radial and elliptic flows =>• new form of matter formed, a strongly
coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma, a near-perfect liquid in regime with very small dissipative terms /s=.1-.2<<1
• Conical flow has larger gradients and is even more sensitive to viscosity
Local perturbation is large =>non-hydrodynamical core+viscous zone
High excitationThe drag force:A(z)=area
Two hydro modes can be excited:
a a ``diffuson” a ``diffuson” a soundsound
Those two lead to quite different spectra, the right (sound) with a
Mach cone:
Dependence on the viscosityis indeed strong
Shocks in medium with variable sound speed:adiabatic invariants
Casalderrey,ES,hep-ph/0511263
Applicability condition
Sound waves in expanding Universe(or ``tsunami going onshore”)
Effective oscillator => v/T by freezeout grows by about factor 3, it enters the exponent of the Cooper-Fry
The 1st order transition=> c_s=0 frozen => reflected waves
which are not observed => excluded already?
Is such a sonic boom already observed?Mean Cs=.33 time average over 3 stages=>
M.Miller, QM04
flow of matter normal to the Mach cone seems to be observed! See data from STAR,
+/-1.23=1.91,4.37
PHENIX jet pair distribution
Note: it is only projection of a cone on phi
Note 2: more
recent data from
STAR find also a minimum in
<p_t(\phi)> at
180 degr., with
a value
Consistent with background
PHENIX: Reaction Plane Angle Dependence
(from B.Cole)
– Flow systematics change completely vs
trig
Shoulder and dip seen
in all trig bins.
Has the sonic boom been already seen?Mean Cs=.33 time average over 3
stages=> = +/-1.23=1.91
trig
?
From Poster by J. Jia
Away <pT> vs centrality
Away core <pT> drops with centrality faster than corona <pT>.Core hadrons almost identical to medium in central collisions.A punch-thorugh at the highest trigger?
STAR,Preliminary
away <pT> dependence on angle (STAR,preliminary)
Preliminary
<pT> (phi) has a dip structure in central AA.
Mach shock wave?
Conclusions
• sQGP leads to dE/dx in excess of pQCD. AdS/CFT results are still mysterious,
• very robust collective flows =>sQGP seems to be the most ideal fluid known
/s=.1-.2 <<1• All of this hints that quenched energy is not
dissipated but propagates
• Hydro solution with Mach cones is worked out, hydro drag force calculated
• Case with expansion and variable c^2(t)
=> Factor 3 enhancement of v/T
• Peaks at about 60 degrees are predicted and seen by PHENIX and STAR
• shape and position corresponds to expected Mach angle
• No peaks for reflected shocks =>1st order excluded