THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

AGENDA – REGULAR MEETING

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

7:00 PM

Council Chambers City Hall

ITEM SUBJECT MATTER RECOMMENDATION

1 CALL TO ORDER Call to Order Call Meeting to Order

2 PUBLIC INPUT PERIOD

3 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA April 10, 2012 Agenda Adopt Agenda

4 MINUTES

a) March 26, 2012 Regular Meeting Minutes Adopt Minutes

b) March 26, 2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting Minutes

Adopt Minutes and recommendations within.

5 REGISTERED PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS

Nil

6 UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Nil

7 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF FOR DECISION

Nil

8 REQUESTS ARISING FROM CORRESPONDENCE

Nil

9 INFORMATION ITEMS

a) Information Items Summary of informational items 7(a) to 7(k)

Receive the list of information items and approve the recommendations.

10 BYLAWSa) Manager of Finance / Chief Financial Officer - request for decision

Bylaw No. 2527 - City of Rossland Financial Plan 2012-2015 Bylaw

Adoption of Bylaw 2527.

b) Corporate Officer - request for decision

Bylaw No. 2528 - City of Rossland Transportation Plan Bylaw

First three readings of Bylaw 2528.

11 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS

12 RECESS TO IN-CAMERA MEETING

Remainder of the meeting of April 10, 2012 be closed to the public pursuant to section 90(1)(c) and (k)

13 ADJOURNMENT

2 of 87

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2012

PRESENT:

STAFF PRESENT:

CALL TO ORDER:

MAYOR GREG GRANSTROM COUNCilLOR KATHY MOORE COUNC~LORTUMTHATCHER

COUNC~LOR KATHY WALLACE COUNC~LOR JODY BLOMME COUNC~LOR CARY FISHER COUNC~LORJ~LSPEARN

CHIEF ADMINISTRATNE OFFICER CORPORATE OFFICER

GALLERY

,th.

,.tl,, The Mayor called the Meeting to order at 7:02p.m. ,, .. ,'_1. lt

111 II 0 hlr'

·'1 1r . . h. J ' .. ,, '""'tt lj,, ..

PUBLIC INPUT PERIOD: 11 )'"'It•·· ·"" .j , ••

V.Kumar T. Butler

•'"'''I II

hn 1 d d .!l!.!.:.luuull•'' d . Mr. Jo Greene, Ross an Pro Har w~J;e t~~·~:rr, 1ea a statement expressmg concerns of the parallel parking proposed for the Columbia A~P.,ue Reb'ffi.ld project.

lijl -p lilt•''

Ms. Wagner, spoke on behalf of Mrs. Rosanne Chobanuk, owner of the Legacy Gift Room. The concerns expressed included opposition of parallel parking, sidewalk development.

Mr. Bill Micklethwaite, expressed his concerns over the proposed parallel parking and widened sidewalks.

RECESS TO COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING:

MOTION: WALLACE /SPEARN

RESOLVED THAT THIS REGULAR MEETING OF COUNC~ BE RECESSED AT 7:12P.M. TO ALLOW FOR THE COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING, AND THAT THIS REGULAR MEETING OF COUNC~ BE RECONVENED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE COMMITTEE-OF­THE-WHOLE MEETING.

CARRIED. The Meeting was recessed at 7:12p.m. and reconvened at 7:16p.m.

MARCH 26,2012 REGULAR MEETING Page 1

3 of 87

ADOPTION OF AGENDA:

MOTION: MOORE I SPEARN

RESOLVED THAT THE MARCH 26,2012 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW ITEM #13 - RECESS TO IN-CAMERA, AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE REGULAR AGENDA OF MARCH 26, 2012.

CARRIED.

MINUTES:

MOTION: MOORE I FISHER

RESOLVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL, HELD ON MARCH 12, 2012, BE ADOPTED.

CARRIED.

MOTION: FISHER I THATCHER •'"· ,,,1,, •t It

··"··. 'h •. RESOLVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE POOLlC HEARING OF BYLAW No. 2526 HELD

''It( '· ON MARCH 12, 2012, BE ADOPTED. ''·I lt,1 . ,,,,,, ,,. c

\. ,111,,11''. ARRIED. 1,• ,.u,,,, 1\ .•lit I I•'

..... .. lt1u1•uu•rr··· .•tf ''Ill .. ,,,, ..

111. 1; MOTION: FISHER I W ALLACEitt

11 .i'

y·

RESOLVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING HELD MARCH 12, 2012, AND ALL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, BE ADOPTED.

CARRIED.

DELEGATIONS:

Ms. Renee Clark, Rossland Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, made a power point presentation to Council titled "Downtown Merchants Feedback on the Proposed Columbia Avenue Project".

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

Nil

MARCH 26,2012 REGULAR MEETING Page 2

4 of 87

RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF FOR DECISION:

Nil

REQUESTS ARISING FROM CORRESPONDENCE:

a) Recreation Department Request for Decision- request for fee waiver, Miners Hall rental from the Rossland Childcare Society.

MOTION: MOORE I SPEARN

RESOLVED THAT COUNCil- APPROVES A GRANT IN AID TO THE ROSSLAND CHU-DCARE SOCIETY OF $57.50 TO SUPPORT THE MAY 5, 2012 FUND RAISING EVENT.

CARRIED.

,tit.

INFORMATION ITEMS: ,,,1,1 •I It ··"··· ,,,,

INFORMATION ITEMS NUMBERED 6(a) TO 6(1)' '11,11 )•·. !w ,,, .,,,hit, ,,,,,. a) March 8, 2012 letter-from the Rossland 6:):i~ber of Commerce requesting the creation of a

,tlllJ!i t, Communications Committee fo1ii11 tne proposed Columbia Avenue Rebuild Project. Recommendation for Mayor l~lifq~;~"Tilsk Force.

. ··'htt Ill. !I•· b) Neighbourhood of Learning Co~hee Meeting Notes of December 15, 2011, January 16,

2012, February 9, 2012 and March'!, 2012. Recommendation to file.

c) March 1, 2012letter from the Lower Columbia Initiatives Corporation informing Council of their economic development project in co-operation with Selkirk College's Rural Development Institute. Recommendation to f"Ile.

d) March 12, 2012 email and attachment to Council from the Rossland Sustainability Commission recommending bringing forward Economic Development initiatives to the Lower Columbia Initiatives Corporation. Recommendation to forward information to the LCIC for consideration after Council edits.

e) February 28, 2012 UBCM notification of approval of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan Application (CWPP Amendment, 2012). Recommendation to move forward with plan under consultation with Fire Line Consulting.

f) March 2, 2012 UBCM notification of approval of the Operational Fuel Treatment Application (Rossland Operational Treatment, 2012). Recommendation to move forward with plan under consultation with Fire Line Consulting.

g) March 2, 2012 UBCM notification of completion of Fuel Treatment Prescription (Colt 45, Iron Colt & Star Reservoir, 2011). Recommendation to file.

MARCH 26,2012 REGULAR MEETING Page 3

5 of 87

h) March 14,2012 News Release from BC Transit regarding more commuter and evening service for Kootenay Boundary. Recommendation to f"Ile.

i) Copy of March 1, 2012 letter from the Ministry of Justice to the UBCM inviting input into the development for policing in BC in regards to the Premier's Families First Agenda for Change .. Recommendation to f"Ile.

j) March 8, 2012 meeting notes from the Resort Communities Meeting and draft agenda for the 2012 Resort Community collaborative Workshop June 5-7, 2012. Recommendation for CAO and CFO to attend the workshop.

k) March 9, 2012 email from the Ministry of Advanced Education and Labour Market Development, Immigrant Integration Branch regarding the Welcoming Communities Program and the Trail session being held April 11, 2012. Recommendation to f"Ile.

1) Copy of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary preliminary 2012 Budget and Capital Plan. Recommendation to file.

J,H •.

MOTION: MOORE I THATCHER ./11t11 ···'··· ,,,, ·•fi I Ill•'

RESOLVED THAT INFORMATION ITEMS 6(d) ,11jf3E AMENDED BEFORE FORWARDING TO THE LCIC BY EDITING "ROSSLAND EC@N.;p Mte DEVELOPMENT FOCUS #5 - BUILD REGIONAL COOPERATION" BY DELET~G J¥E''FtRST POINT IN THE DOCUMENT.

Al 11 11·· ,,,,,,,llllttlf' 1

•''111111111 Itt CARRIED. AI, Ill .1"'

'"· MOTION: WALLACE I SPEARN

RESOLVED THAT INFORMATION ITEMS 6(a) TO 6(1), BE RECEIVED AND ACTED UPON AS RECOMMENDED EXCEPT FOR ITEM 6(d).

CARRIED.

BYLAWS:

a) Manager of Finance I Chief Financial Officer Request for Decision- First three readings of Bylaw No. 2527- City of Rossland Financial Plan 2012-2015.

MOTION: THATCHER I WALLACE

RESOLVED THAT BYLAW NO. 2527- CITY OF ROSSLAND FINANCIAL PLAN 2012-2016 BYLAW, BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME.

CARRIED.

MARCH 26,2012 REGULAR MEETING Page 4

6 of 87

MEMBERS REPORTS <VERBAL)

Councillor Wallace:

Councillor Wallace reported on the following items: • 2012 is the final year for collecting taxes for the old hospital debt. • Taxation being maintained for the WKBRHA for 2012 but significant capital needs are

forthcoming. • City of Trail requesting second access to the hospital. • Attending Climate Action Workshop.

Councillor Moore:

Councillor Moore reported on the following items: • Bears are awake. • When the Capacity Connection Bylaw will be forthcoming. • Inquired how the parcel tax collected will affect Capacity Connection Bylaw.

Councillor Blomme: ,n.

Councillor Blomme reported on the following items: 1 -(111

1111.1 •''· I • Attendance at Tourism Rossland and Rossland Cli~per o~Commerce board meetings.

lt1 • '1 111 1111

1111'' Mayor Granstrom. \1 ,,,11'''11'. ,·"''' ,, .

·''" ll 1t• Mayor Granstrom reported on the followirig ttems~u· ..

1 tl l tt , , \4~.ll • Will be forming a task force for th~;co11r~ia Avenue rebuild project. • The Canadian Ski Hall of Fame tas~1frrc¢ has been set up and will be meeting shortly. :rh,,• • Upcoming meeting April2, 2012 with :reck to discuss the Rossland Museum. • Tender opening for Columbia Rebuild Project will be extended to April2, 2012.

CLOSED MEETING RESOLUTION:

MOTION: WALLACE I FISHER

RESOLVED THAT THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING OF MARCH 26, 2012 BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC PURSUANT TO SECTON 90(1)(K) OF THE COMMUNITY CHARTER.

CARRIED.

ADJOURNMENT:

MOTION: GRANSTROM

RESOLVED THAT THIS REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL BE ADJOURNED AT 8:47P.M.

MARCH 26, 2012 REGULAR MEETING Page 5

7 of 87

CARRIED.

C E R T IF IE D C 0 R R E C T:

MAYOR GREG E. GRANSTROM

CORPORATE OFFICER- TRACEY BUTLER

MARCH 26,2012 REGULAR MEETING Page 6

8 of 87

I I

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING OF COUNCIL MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2012

PRESENT:

STAFF PRESENT:

CALL TO ORDER:

MAYOR GREG GRANSTROM COUNCILLOR KATHY MOORE COUNCILLOR JODY BLOMME COUNCILLORTIMTHATCHER COUNCILLOR KATHY WALLACE COUNCILLOR CARY FISHER COUNCILLOR JILL SPEARN

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CORPORATE OFFICER

GALLERY

•''"'· , .. ,,,, •I II The Mayor called the Meeting to order at 7:12p.m. ,•''"·' lt11

I' ' ,,, •. ··'lit.}·. .

''II .,,,,,,,, ,,, .. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: it ) 1111'11''.

···"11!1 '• ·'''' .l ,, .. MOTION: THATCHER I SPEARN 111tt'111'11nt"' , ••• •1111111 ,,,, .

V.Kumar T. Butler

. ·•llh ''" )'' RESOLVED THAT THE MARCH 2~~120112 COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING AGENDA BE ADOPTED. ''~It•''

CARRIED.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

a) Discussion on Columbia Avenue Rebuild Project- Resolution from March 5, 2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting.

MOTION: WALLACE/THATCHER

RESOLVED THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL THAT DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE COLUMBIA A VENUE REBUILD PROJECT BE DEFERRED TO A MEETING ONCE FIRM NUMBERS ARE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS.

MARCH 26, 2012 COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING

CARRIED.

Page 1

9 of 87

)

ADJOURNMENT:

MOTION: GRANSTROM

RESOLVED THAT THE MARCH 26, 2012 COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 7:16P.M.

C E R T IF IE D C 0 R R E C T:

MAYOR GREG E. GRANSTROM

CORPORATE OFFICER- TRACEY BUTLER

MARCH 26,2012 COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING

CARRIED.

Page 2

10 of 87

Date:

Agenda:

Proposal:

Proposed by:

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

Council Information Summary

March 30, 2012

April10, 2012

To Receive the Items Summarized for Information

Staff

Staff Recommendation:

1. General recommended motion:

THAT information items numbered ?(a) to 7(k) be received and acted upon as recommended.

2. Alternative motion if an item needs further consideration:

7(a)

7(b)

7(c)

7(d)

7(e)

7(f)

7(g)

THAT information items numbered ?(a) to 7(k), except for items numbered-----be received and acted upon as recommended.

JliM SUiiiJii;~I 1!116III;B BECOI!IJI!IJENP6IION

Golden City Days Request for help from City ~pprove re~uests pending ithe Columbta !Reconstruction Project I

~KBLG and UBCM !Municipal Taxation and Local File ~ovemment Review. Appointment to

xpert Panel

W ex Atamanenko, MP and the ~omprehensive Economic Trade File Village ofNew Denver greement (CETA)- Report by the

,Standing Committee on International jTrade.

Rossland Senior Citizens recap oflast 5 years !File Lodge#45

I IRossland Senior Citizens !Columbia Ave & Washington St iReceive and File

I

I Lodge#45 !Proposed changes

I City ofRossland Sustainability1March 21, 2012 meeting minutes !Receive and File I

Commission I I

I

I I I

jLetter from T. C. Johnston jWater consumption request for waiver !Deny request

r ceived Mar 27/12 Jof$84.80 i I

I I

I I

11 of 87

7(h) City of Rossland Heritage January 16, 2012 Meeting Minutes !Rec~ive and approve Commission motions.

7(i) ~arch 26,2012 Email from fnsuccessful Community Recreation r ile am Edwards, Director, Min. Program Application- Rossland If Community Services Swimming Pool

I I

70) IBCM j"In the House" Publication Mar 29/12 r ile

~ederal Budget Highlights

7(k) !The Association of Kootenay \Minutes of2011 AKBLG AGM jCopies to attendees of the & Boundary Local 2012 AKBLG Resolutions !AKBLG Conference. Governments (AKBLG)

I I

I I

12 of 87

March 22,2012

City of Rossland Mayor Granstrom and City Council Members Rossland, BC VOG 1 YO

Dear Mayor Granstrom and Council Members:

Rossland Golden City Days PO Box 1572 Rossland, BC VOG 1 YO 250-362-9562

We invite the City ofRossland to be involved in the annual, traditional celebration of our history and culture during Golden City Days 2012! We look forward to celebrating our heritage and wonderful community spirit during this beloved family-oriented festival, September 7-9, 2012.

In order to effectively facilitate Golden City Days 2012, we respectfully request help from the City of Rossland with regards to:

a. The closure of Columbia Avenue between St. Paul and Spokane on Saturday, September gtb from 10:30 am to 12:00 pm for the parade.

b. We would like to use the RSS rear parking lot to line up parade entries on Sept. gth. Depending on the number and size of entries, may we use the space in front of RSS, if needed? The route would see the parade leave the rear parking lot at 10:40 am by 4th Ave., turning right onto St Paul, left on Second Ave, right on Monte Christo, past MacLean School and the Courthouse, right onto Columbia Ave. and into town, ending at Pioneer Park. May we have barricades placed at the following intersections at 10:45 am, and picked up as the parade passes each point: 4th & St. Paul; St. Paul & 2nd; 2nd & Monte Christo; Monte Christo & Columbia?

c. The closure of Washington St. from Columbia Ave. to First Ave. from 8 am to 8 pm, Saturday, Sept. 8th, including the placement of barricades, activation and use of all power on Wash. St.

d. Transport the two portable stages from the Emcon lot and deliver to Washington St., by 8 am, Saturday, September 8th. Transport two portable stages from Washington St. to Emcon storage at 7 pm. We can provide help, if needed.

e. Delivery of7long tables and 60 chairs, to Wash. St. from 8 am -7 pm, Sat., Sept. 8th.

f. Pick up 2 portable toilets from Beaver Valley Rentals on Friday, Sept. 7th. Deliver one toilet by 8 am, Sat., Sept. 8th to Washington St., to be placed against back wall ofRossland Hardware. Deliver one toilet to Emcon lot. Move one toilet Sat. evening to Centennial Trail parking lot

13 of 87

2

for use at the Golden City Grind on Sun.~ Sept. 9th. Return portable toilets to Beaver Valley Rentals on Mon., Sept. 1oth.

g. The use of the former Emcon site for athletic events, and possibly the display of heavy equipment. The use of several pieces oflarge City equipment (dump truck, fire truck, loader) for children to look at and/or sit on, with adult supervision. The use of power at the Emcon lot from 10 am -7 pm, on Sat., Sept. 8th.

h. Activation and use of power in Pioneer Park on Saturday, September 8th, from 9 am- 2 pm.

i.

j.

Delivery of 3 tables (picnic tables would be fine), one garbage bin, and 6 chairs to the park.

The contribution of two large (96-pieces each) cakes from Ferraro Foods, for the Pioneer Park post-parade reception. We will place the order and pick up the cakes.

Contribute and deliver one load of sand ~take Your Claim event) to the vacant lot beside Mountain Haus by noon, Friday, Sept. 7t .

k. The closure of Queen St., between Columbia and LeRoi on Sat., Sept. gth, from 8 am- 6 pm. The NDCU is sponsoring the climbing wall and inflatable children's fun park!

1. A letter of endorsement supporting the GCD Committee's efforts and authorization for us to include a copy of said letter when soliciting event sponsors.

m. We are hosting a free children's matinee on Sunday, Sept. 9th, at 3:00pm, in the Miners' Hall. We have booked the hall for that afternoon and early evening. Would Council consider waiving the rental fee for this event?

The GCD 2012 Committee will purchase Special Event liability insurance, covering all events during the weekend. The City ofRossland will be named as additional insureds.

The City has always been instrumental in making this event possible and we look forward to working with City staff. We value the support and encouragement we need from your level of government as we promote this event to our local citizens and community neighbors to come and enjoy. We also appreciate an open, flexible relationship, should some of the above requirements need to be changed as planning progresses.

I appreciate your time and look forward to answering any questions you may have.

Many thanks,

Terry Brinson, Coordinator Rossland Golden City Days 2012 rbrinson@telus.net, 250-362-9562

14 of 87

35

KBLG 790 Shakespeare Street, Trail BC V1R 2B4

Phone 250-368-86so I Cell 250-231-0404 I Email akblg@shaw.ca

March 16,2012

Minister of Finance Honorable Kevin Falcon P 0 Box 9417 Stn Prov Govt BC Legislature Victoria, BC V8W 9Vl

Dear Minister Falcon:

Re: Municjpal Taxation and Local Government Review

We are writing in regards to your appointment of an Expert Panel to provide analysis and recommendations regarding the system ofbusiness taxation in British Columbia. We would like to voice our concern that a panel investigating municipal taxation lacks any representation from local government. A local government perspective would ensure the validity of decisions made to all citizens of British Columbia.

We sincerely hope that you will reconsider your decision not to include local government in a decision making process that affects local government.

Respectfully,

I . -/JAA. : j ~~.~~-v-...J

l wes Grallam; President Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Governments

Cc: AKBLG Membership UBCM Executive

15 of 87

36

MEMBER RELEASE February 10, 2012

TO:

FROM:

Mayor and Counci l; Chair and Board; Senior Staff

Heath Slee, President

RE: Province To Review Municipal Taxation and Local Government Revenue

The Province of British Columbia is undertaking two reviews of direct interest to local government: an Expert Panel Review of Business Taxation and a Local Government Revenue Sources Review. I am writing to provide background on both of these initiatives.

1. Expert Panel Review of Business Taxation

On January 10, Finance Minister Kevin Falcon announced the appointment of an Expert Panel to provide analysis and recommendations regarding the system of business taxation in British Columbia. The panel will also make recommendations for administrative improvements that streamline the Provincial Sales Tax. This initiative is under the "Canada Starts Here: The BC Jobs Plan", and the panel must report by August 31, 2012.

The guidelines for the Expert Panel state that "(t)he review will include an examination of municipal property taxation of business and its impact on business competitiveness and investment. Recommendations must address issues of affordability and sustainability for local governments within the framework of the Community Charter."

Panel members are: • Sarah Morgan-Silvester, Chancellor, University of British Columbia • Lindsay Hall, Chief Financial Officer, Goldcorp • laura Jones, Senior VP, Canadian Federation of Independent Business • Elio Luongo, Canadian Managing Partner, I<PMG • Fiona Macfarlane, Managing Partner, Ernst & Young • Grace Wong, VP Academic, University of British Columbia • Dale Wall, former Deputy Minister, Province of BC (adjunct member)

The full text of the news release and terms of reference for the panel are available here: http://www2.news.w>v .bc.ca/news releases 2009·2013/2012f!N0002-000018.htm .

2. Local Government Revenue Sources Review

The Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development has advised UBCM that, in order to supplement the work of the Expert Panel Review of Business Taxation, and to fully

ubcm.ca

16 of 87

37

meet the Premier's commitment to review the municipal tax formula, the Ministry is embarking on a Local Government Revenue Sources Review.

The terms of reference for that review are not yet complete, but UBCM has been provided with some preliminary briefing material.

At this point, it appears that the review will encompass both municipal and regional district revenues from all sources, including property and other taxes, fees, grants and other transfers. The review is expected to determine trends over time and to consider whether grants are meeting the needs of the provincial government. A literature review and some form of inter~jurisdictional analysis are also expected, as is an analysis of the municipal tax policy objectives set out in municipal financial plans in BC.

The review is expected to be completed by July 31, 2012 and may provide context and background to recommendations of the Expert Panel and/or further policy change.

3. UBCM Encasement

Both reviews were topics of discussion during the meeting of UBCM's Executive of February 3, 2012. During the portion of the meeting where we were joined by Ida Chong, Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development, the Executive noted that local governments would be concerned that a panel investigating municipal taxation lacks local government representation. The Executive also commented that the composition of the Expert Panel might lead to questioning of its recommendations.

In terms of next steps, UBCM will contact the Expert Panel to express interest in providing a presentation. I have also written to Minister Chong to say that UBCM would be pleased to work collaboratively on the Revenue Sources Review. The Executive will also consider options to ensure that the perspective of local government with regard to business taxation and local government revenue is both heard and understood. UBCM will keep watch on both reviews as they get underway, and will provide updates as substantive information becomes available.

ubcm.ca

17 of 87

38

City Hall

From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Dear Colleagues,

alex.atamanenko.a1@parl.gc.ca Friday, March 16, 2012 5:34 PM alex.atamanenko.p9@parl.gc.ca CETA New Denve- Minister Fast-CETA- Feb12.pdf; NDP dissenting Opinion ITC CETA Report-2012.pdf; Terry Boehem- CETA- 15Mar12.pdf; TJN- Opposition sidelined in SCIT report - 14Mar12.docx

Attached please find a letter to the Minister of International Trade from the Village of New Denver regarding local government and the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) under negotiation between Canada and the European Union.

I am also including some information on this agreement which I trust you will find to be of interest.

To view the entire report of a recent study conducted by the Standing Committee on International Trade please visit the link below. I have taken the liberty of attaching the NDP's dissenting opinion and recommendations which were tabled in the House of Commons as part of this report. bttp:Uwww.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Committee/411/CIIT/Reports/RPS431905/CIITrp01/cjjtrp01 -e. pdf

Sincerely,

Alex Atamanenko, MP BC Southern Interior

Legislative Assistant To Alex Atamanenko, MP BC Southern Interior Tel: (250) 365 2792 Toll Free in BC: 1 800 667 2393 Fax: (250) 365 2 793 rA Help save paper do you need to print this email?

Website: http://alexndp.ca/

I always wondered why somebody didn't DO something, then I realized I was somebody .. ..

1

18 of 87

Corporation of the Village of New Denvell" P .0 . Bo~ 40. t-iew Denver. 9C VO lSO (250)358-2316 FAX (2SO) 358-1231

C. Gordon, CMC, Admin tratrJr

February21, 2012

Honourable Edward Fast, Minister of International Trade Office of the Minister of International Trade 125 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1AOG2 .

Dear,Fast

&c: Caqp.da European Union Trade Agreement CCETA> I I

A. Bunka, Mayof

RiC'OOREGU

~l~ 2 3 2012

The Counc. of the Village ofNew Denver received conespOX\dence regarding the above at its February 11, 2012 Regular Meeting. As a newly elected local government body. our Council has grave coru:cp:ns and res~rvations regarding the Canada European Union Trade Agreement and would like fO reiterate and endorse the position of the previous Council in calling for the Provinces f Federal Oovermnent "'to negotiate a clear. pennanent exemption" for local govemmen from the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).

! Council ha; grave concerns that the CETA Agreement will impm its ability to procure goods and servicep locally~ and that it would lose its ability to control its own local government facilities s'*h as water, etc.

I Yours trUly,

~~ Care?l Gordon, CMC Administrator

cc: The Honourable Christy Clark, Premier of British Columbia Union ofBC Municipalities The Federation of Canadian Municipalities Alex Atamanenko, M.P. for BC Southern Interior

ll69EP6£19 gg:zt ztBl/Ll/ZB

19 of 87

40

HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA

NEGOTIATIONS TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC AND TRADE AGREEME~T (CETA)

BETWEEN CANADA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade

Hon. Rob Merrifield, P.C., M.P. Chair

MARCH 2012

41st PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION

20 of 87

41

NDP Dissenting Report for CIIT - CETA Study

The NDP thanks the Committee and witnesses for the time put into this important subject. International trade is crucial to sustaining Canada's economic growth and prosperity, and increasing trade with the European Community is an important goal. While the NDP is supportive of efforts to lift tariffs, and diversify our export markets., boosting Canada's trade performance will require more than just free trade agreements. Our success will require a strategic plan for public investment and support of key value­added industrial sectors to help back Canadian global winners, which we are pleased to see as a recommendation from the committee.

At the same time, it is clear that trade and investment agreements, such as the Canada­EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), are about far more than just international trade. Such treaties affect public regulation of investment, services, intellectual property, public purchasing and other matters only peripherally related to trade. The detail~ and terms of the agreement matter and must be scrutinized to weigh costs and benefits. We do not support concluding the deal as currently framed in the time period recommended by the majority on the Committee.

Transparency is essential. The NDP objects to the lack of transparency in the current negotiation process. Closed-door meetings have created a climate of secrecy in the CETA process. Too little public information exists for Canadians and their elected representatives. at all levels of government, to reach informed conclusions on the merits and risks of CET A It is only through a meaningful consultation process, which engages all stakeholders, that we will craft trade agreements that benefit all Canadians. Even this Parliamentary Committee study did not allow full participation for interested stakeholders, including many submitted by the NDP.

The treatment of public services in free trade agreements is controversial. Too often, treaty protections for sensitive sectors such as health care, education, social services and municipally provided services including water treatment and delivery or public transit leave the door open to trade and investment challenges. Public contracts for these and other services are a principal point of interest for the EU in the CETA negotiations. Canada must seek a clear exclusion for public services broadly understood as well as protection for future policy flexibility at all levels of government.

For health care. there is particular concern from experts and citizens groups that the government is stepping back even from the protections it built into the NAFT A A strong exclusion for healthcare is needed, as well as a commitment to avoid inflating the costs of medicine, whic~ are the fastest-rising component of Canadian health care costs.

CETA would be the first Canadian bilateral FTA since NAFTA to have an intellectual property rights (IPR) chapter, going well beyond Canada's existing obligations. EU demands include adding the extra time it takes for a drug to receive regulatory approval (up to 5 years) to the regular 20-year term of patent protection, longer terms for data

37

21 of 87

42

protection (from 8 to 10 years), and new rights of appeal that could delay the approval of generic drugs. Such changes would reduce the availability of medicines, and drive up drug costs, which could deal a critical blow to the sustainability of our health care system. A recent study estimates these extra costs at $2.8 billion annually.

Since IPR provisions are so rare in Canadian bilateral trade agreements and European negotiators have placed such great weight on these provisions, we should scrutinize the implications carefully. Further study is needed to consider the implications of harmonizing our IPR system with the EU in all relevant sectors and to determine the costs or benefits that will be witnessed by Canadian consumers and producers.

The NDP also has significant concerns about the CETA's impact on government procurement at the sub-federal level. From available information, the proposed rules would prevent governments from considering, in covered sectors, any 'condition' that encourages local development in procurement contracts or bids, even if the process Is non discriminatory to foreign bidders. Restricting government procurement in this way deprives provincial and municipal governments of crucial economic levers, particularly during economic downturns, to use government purchasing to stimulate the economy and encourage local spinoffs.

The NDP supports the need for open and fair government tendering practices, but this does not require sacrificing the ability for governments to use procurement to serve local economic objectives. Municipalities including Toronto, the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (representing 150 municipalities) and over twenty others across the country, have been raising red flags about the back room CETA trade talks. These municipalities have asked their provincial and federal governments to ensure their existing rights are protected under any new trade agreement and that they be excluded from the CETA Their concerns must be heard and addressed.

As noted in the Committee's report, participation of the provinces in the negotiations makes the process more complex. The objective to bind sub federal levels of government in the CET A on a range of issues from procurement to services raises important questions of constitutional authority, particularly in relation to enforcement of the agreement and financial liability. Further study is warranted.

The NDP welcomes any opportunities for real export growth for Canadian agricultural sectors, while noting continued European resistance at various levels. We also remain concerned about continued pressures to open Canada· s supply managed sectors, which must be protected.

The CETA also needs to account for the highly integrated nature of North American production and the NDP appreciates the acknowledgement of this issue in the committee's report. Provisions regarding rules ·of origin must be sufficiently broad to ensure the vast majority of Canadian exports are not subject to tariffs. The automotive industry is of particular concern given the high degree of cross-border production and the potential sensitivity of production decisions to various rules of origin thresholds.

38

22 of 87

43

Finally, the NDP views investor-state provisions as an inequitable element in trade agreements that privilege corporations in a way that conflicts with the public interest. Investor-state arbitration allows foreign investors to bypass domestic court systems. Arbitration tribunals, which lack accountability, can order governments to compensate investors allegedly harmed by public policies or regulations. Both Canada and Europe have highly regarded court systems that protect the rights of all investors regardless-of nationality. The NDP opposes including investor-state arbitration in the CETA and recommends that Canada follow the lead of Australia in rejecting investor-state arbitration in future trade and investment agreements.

In conclusion, the NDP urges a re-think of Canada's approach to expanding trade with Europe, and consideration of means for enhancing mutual economic prosperity in a way that contributes to a greener economy, and bolsters high quality jobs and labour rights, while respecting democratic decision making regarding public services, public regulation, local government procurement and the public interest.

Recommendations

1. The Government should publicly disclose the negotiating text and Canada's offers (federal, provincial, territorial) before the text of the treaty Is finalized.

2. The Government should ensure full consultation with municipal governments in Canada regarding CETA offers and negotiations, and modify its time frame for the negotiations to enable this participation.

3. The Government sh~uld ensure that the final text does not Include Investor­state arbitration provisions.

4. The Government should ensure that the final text does not include any changes to patent protection that would decrease the availability of generic drugs or Increase drug costs.

5. The Government should ensure that the final text exempts provincial, territorial and municipal government procurement.

6. The Government should ensure that municipal drinking water and waste water services are explicitly included in its Annex II reservations.

7. The Government should seek a clear and broad exclusion for public services including protection for future policy flexibility at all levels of government to expand public services or return privatized sectors to the public sector without threat of litigation.

39

23 of 87

44

8. The Government should negotiate a new exemption for health care stipulating that nothing In the CETA shall be construed to apply to measures of a signing party regarding health care or insurance.

9. The Government should ensure a broad cultural exemption in CETA that would exclude books, magazines, newspapers, publishing, broadcasting, film, video, performing arts and other aspects of cultural industries.

10. The Government should exclude over-access tariffs on supply-managed products from tariff reduction, and re affirm that producers and their elected representatives will maintain the unfettered ability to collectively manage domestic supply for egg, poultry, and dairy products.

11. The Government should effectively safeguard the capacity to institute or re­institute a single desk for grain marketing, in any geographic region, should a majority of farmers' elected representatives decide to do so.

12. The Government should develop an industrial strategy for Canada that partners with industry to identify competitive high-productivity sectors that can be developed into high-value export champions, as well as current export sectors In Canada that may need support to remain competitive with the European Union (including forestry, auto, etc.). This could Include leveraging procurement, providing R&D support through direct grants, and improving both physical and knowledge infrastructure.

13. The Government must retain the ability to implement federal flnancoal incentives and ensure community benefits in the development of clean power, including solar, wind, and water. Canada must develop innovative green energy technologies that will help us meet domestic needs and access a growing global market.

14. The Government should commission an independent study of the CETA whose specific terms of reference would be to determine the true cost of harmonizing Canada's intellectual property system with that of the European Union.

15. The Government of Canada should insist that the CETA agreement establish a framework for ensuring market access, and continued production, for Canadian producers of comparable agricultural and food products that use designations protected under the EU's Geographic Indications regime .

40

24 of 87

45

16. That the Government of Canada undertake a study to review where the CET A addresses areas of provincial jurisdiction as it related to the distribution of powers:

- in particular with respect to section 92 of The Constitution Act, 1867; and

- in all areas where there is shared, overlapping, or concurrent jurisdiction, and report on key implementation and enforcement Issues that could arise.

17. That Government should ensure that CETA's provisions related to rules of origin are broad enough to ensure meaningful market access gains for Canadian exports, particularly auto~ fish and agricultural products, recognizing the reality of highly integrated North American supply chains. With Specific reference to the Canadian automotive sector, the CETA must specify low rules of origin thresholds for Canadian manufactured automobiles.

41

25 of 87

46

1'1!1 IJnlon FDrtMr Quort~ri)'/SprlllfllDJl

CETA geHing tougher on Citizens with each SECRET Draft -by Teny Btleltm, NFU President

T he striking thing about reading the various leaked drafts of the Comprehensive

· Economic nnd Trade Agreement (CETA) is that after nine major rounds of negotiations, the agreement is essentinll)• getting worse for Canada and her citizens. This is not to say that it is particular!~· good for the ordinary European citiu:n, but it does gi,·e European corporate interests unprecedented access and ultimately control over the Canadian economy, down to the sub nationalle\•el (pro\'inces, territories, and municipalities).

Now the question is what is a European corporation? The answer is much broader than one would el!pect, C\•en in an era dominated by transnational corporations. The Europeans define as Europc;~n :my corporation with an "effective and continuous link" with the economy of a member state. 1l1is definition essentially defines an)' business. no matter where it is headquartered, as an appropriate beneficiary of what CET.\ brings to large corporations. TI1is means that when towns and villages, cities and provinces. hospitals and schools, universities and crown corporations, post their tenders for goods and services, they may have to accept bids and hire or buy not just from Europe, but from whatever business that has an "effccti\'e and continuous link."

One of the worrisome things that has stood out throughout this process, has been the disallowance of offering any more favourable treatment to a local or national supplier of a good or service, than to a foreign supplier. This quite simply means that one could not implement "buy local" programs, or favour local businesses in an1· tender (subject to certain thresholds: $130,000 fOT goods and services at the federal level,

$35~.000 for provinces and municipalities, and $5,000,000 for construction nt all levels) . Exclusive local food purchasing programs would fall under this prohibition, and they would be subject to standardized certification programs as well. Local businesses and farmers who pay the taxes that make things function locally and nationally, cannot expect to be patronized by their own governments and institutions. Schools, hospitals, villages, universities, and governments would also have to post their tenders, and their int~nded tenders, in an elaborate electronic and paper process that makes them completely available internationally. The process demanded is deacribed in 32 pages of text in the agreement. No small task for the local village council that wants to renovate the local water svstem or town hall! ·

What this agreement has always been about, is limiting the role of citizens and governments to conduct their affairs as they see fit . It is also fundamentally about malting sure that large business interests (finance capital), has both unrestricted access to resources and minimal regulation. An el!ample is in a clause similar to the resource controls in NAFTA. Under CETA (Article 50.1 c) you can only restrict the consumption or extraction of exhaustible natural resources, if you restrict t·ou own population and businesses as well. In another telling section (Article X.3) "Neither Party may impose limitations on: (iv) the participation of foreign capital in terms of maximum percentage limit on foreign share holding or the total \'aluc of individual or aggregate foreign investment." In the past we used to worry about foreign ownership and hmit it, now we endorse it, and with CETA we will actually enforce it.

(contimmlonp11g4 /4 ... )

26 of 87

47

(C£TA uzunr touH on ri#u ru. from page I J)

If one looks a little further at the draft text it goes on to 53)' (Article X.9.3): "Neither Party may condition the receipt of an advantage. ..in connection with an itwestment in its territory .... on compliance with any of the following requirements." Meaning the contract given to an investor cannot stipulate the following conditions:

a) to achieve a given level or percentage of domestic content;

b) to purchase, use or accord a preference to goods produced in its territory, or to purchase goods from producers in its territory;

c) to relate in any way the volume or value of imports to the volume or value of exports or to the amount of foreign exchange inflows associated with such investment; or,

d) to restrict the sales of goods or services in its territory that such investment produces or provides by relating such sales in any \Ya)'

to the volume or value of its exports or foreign exchange earnings.

Essentially we can no longer look at our balance of payments and take measures to alter them, and as such we are losing control of one of the fundamental tools of monetary policy. This is particularly dangerous, as exemplified at this very moment by capital outflows and national debt levels that many European nations are experiencing. Again, with CETA the nation-state is to disappear in the regulation of capital, its movement, and its action. The nation-state should, however, enforce the extraction tools that these economic players want.

One of the more powerful of these tools, are intellectual propert)• rights. These instruments cannot exist without the state legislating and enforcing them. Some examples are copyrights, trademarks, patents, plant variety rights, designs, and geographical indications. In CETA we see a draconian set of enforcement measures to make

Tile Union Farmer Quarterly/SpriiiiJ 1012

people comply with intellectual property rights. Even if infringement is only alleged, assets can be seized. Citizens could now go to prison if they violate some of these instruments. The idea of prison tenns is new, and was not seen in earlier drafts. l11c language in the draft text now suggests that any violation of these intellectual property instruments could have criminal (prison tenns) consequences.

Let us look at the fam1er once again in reference to plant \'Rricty protection and patents. Under CET A, a farmer accused of h:J\·ing a protected plant \'ariet~· or a gene patented variety of seed, could see his/her property seized and his/her bank accounts frozen. If convicted his/her crop or seed and the implements f~r growing and han·esting the crop or cleaning the seed will be destroyed, at his/her expense. In addition, injunctions arc to be issued to prevent an infringement from occurring. This could mean if fanners hired the sen·ices of a seed cleaner or cleaned seed themselves, thf\· could be hit with an injunction and they could~ accused of potentiall~· infringing. At the end of the day, if that happens to a few farmers, fear of legal and even criminal consequences will lead people into a comer where they shut up, and pay up, for the corporate seeds they could just as well and cheaply produce themsel\'es.

Extending the term of patents b}' the length of time a regulator takes to make a decision is still part of the agreement. Data supplied to the regulator is to be confidential and protected. The applicant is not to be responsible for consequences even if the applicant's data was in error. This protection is to appl~· to pham1oceutical and agricultural chemical manufacturers.

There are many more aspects of this agreement one could reference. But, when it is held up to the light of dar, it is nothing more than a corporate bill of rights and a giant bill to be paid by the citizens of Canada and Europe. ...._

27 of 87

48 RECEIV·ED MAR 1 9 2012

Pat Thomson - President Rossland Senior Citizens Lodge #45 Les Anderson- Vice PresiMillV OF ROSSLAND. B!QQ&p ofthe.last 5 years Lil Karenko - Treasurer Audrey Mann - Secretary January 10,2012

Renovations were needed. The City paid about $17,000. for paint and new linoleum. Also removal of rubbish and obsolete heavy tables etc. We needed grant money to continue the renovations. Pat and Les went to Nelson to learn how to apply for grants. They needed a project to involve the Community. Audrey came up with a project "Cooking with Grandma• which fit the bill and New Horizons gave us a cheque for about$ 13,000. The executive then went shopping (Les, Lil, Pat and Audrey). We purchases a new stove and fridge.Soon after we bought a wide screen large television. Mary, our bridge leader needed new bridge tables. She purchased several on sale. We got the children for the classes ages five to twelve. Now we had to earn the grant money. Lil took on the job of buying the groceries for our varied menus, This al! went on for several months New Horizons (the grant people) were putting on a Seminar in Vancouver called "Active seniors•. They asked Pat and Audrey to attend and give a talk about our project.

Our next project "The Back Room• began. Les and Pat approached the Credit Union and they donated $ 2,500. A special account was set up by UI.The quitters also donated the proceeds, about $ 2,300. from the sale of a quilt. This money was used for gutting the back room and laying new plywood. Les went shopping for new wood replica tile which he got on sale. Then VI and Les laid all the tile. That was a big job. Now the back room needed extensive electrical work.. Les applied to Columbia River Basin Trust through the City (as they own our building). They allowed $ 3,200. Costs to be paid up front and to present proper receipts for expenditures. John continued meeting with the City and their Engineer and saw the completion of the electrical work.

We decided a Wll exercise machine would be useful for our members. Audrey attended a meeting by New Horizons and applied for $ 1 ,500. They gave us a cheque. We then purchased the exercise machine and accessories.

Swimming at Trail Aquatic Recreation became very expensive for Rosslanders. We approached the City and they agreed to pay half the cost of swimming for Senior members of our Branch. This is an ongoing event.

Rental of Hall The Art Club· They meet Monday afternoons. They are a small group of Artists. They are a

non proffl organization. They kindly decorate our walls with paintings. Some of their members are members. of our lodge and help when we have events.

The Quilters Club - This is a non profit organization who are now holding meetings at our branch. They have members in our branch.

A. A. Society • They are a non profit organization. They meet weekly

Golden City Fiddlers - They hold meetings about once a month or so. Two of the Fiddlers are members of the Branch

Bridge - They play bridge Friday afternoons. They usually have 3 or 4 tables, They pay $ 2.00 per person some of which Is paid tQ the winner and the rest goes to the Branch.

We have been very fortunate to receive money in grants. We are also fortunate to hav~ many dedi~t~ members. who volunteer their time to make our branch a pleasant place to be. This will continue Into the future.

Audrey Mann, Secretary Branch #45

28 of 87

I I

4'9

. , Rec·etveo Al_ . _ , 1 1 , 1 ; . .11 .L~vcZ,91 ;(/_

_ _ _ t.fAR-1. 9 .. 2012 .. . ' '~Jo. - CITY OF· R. . -· . . 0,8-F" :

.,

! . ':, .... ~ f; ~ ~

~~~~""~= '~ ' I

(..

I -

29 of 87

50

Minutes

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF ROSSLAND SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION Council Chambers

Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:00am .. 10:00am

1. Call to order 2. Recruitment of SC Manager 3. Community check-In on the SSP 4. Review of SC I Council processes 5. Council Updates 6. Task Force updates 7. Earth hour 8. New Business

Meeting called to order at 8:06 am. Attending- Victor, Patricia, Steve, Terry, Sara (by phone)

Item 2- SC manager Discussion about a planned shift in the duties of the manager towards more communication, community engagement. While we still want someone with strong core values around sustainability, an academic background in this specialized field was not a requirement. We may be able to secure someone with the credentials for communication, et al while reducing contract costs. Concerns about budget approval process coming after the hiring process. Therefore, candidates will be advised that this job is pending budget approval. Terry to revise and circulate job description.

MOTION: moved by Patricia that the SC proceed with posting contract bids for SC Manager with the intention of recruiting new manager by April 30th (seconded Sarah) CARRIED.

Item 3: SSP focus areas-General agreement that SC priorities need to be aligned with both council and the community at large. Council will be issuing the city's 3-year Strategic plan. SC members will need to read this as it is released. It was decided that the SC sponsor some form of public event by mid-May wherein we could bring the community up to speed on our efforts (ie energy diet, etc) and then run a process whereby we invite input from the community on what they see as the most pressing or strategic priorities for our community. We would hope that council would take part in this process as well. In the end, we would present the results from this public input session back to council. In this way we will be able to discuss our areas of focus with council's input as well as the public's. This event could be used as a recruitment event as well. Several people have expressed interest in the SC et al. We could invite this people into this process. Action: Kelvin and Terry to draft a process re: the above, targeted for mid-May.

30 of 87

51

Page2

Item 4: review of council processes. This discussion was largely limited to the subject of better linking the SC manager with city staff. Victor stated that any communication or information requests of city staff would have to come through him and that requests for information exchange would need to happen on an as-and-when-required basis due to the current workload of city staff.

Item 5- Nothing reported from council

Item 6- Task Force updates- Energy Task Force is in discussion with Fortis to have a post project evaluation. More information coming soon.

Item 7- Earth Hour: March 31- Request that Kel send email reminder to lea's email list re: Fortis pledge.

Meeting adjourned: 9:20 am

31 of 87

RECEIVED MAR 2 7 2012

CITY OF ROSSLAND, B.C.

To Whom It May Concern:

Mayor in Council City of Rossland

Box 1179 Rossland, B.C.

VOG1YO

I am writing concerning my water consumption from the period 31 January 12 to 16 March 12. During the months of January, February, and unti116 Mar, I was out of town and no one was living in my residence. Due to a incident involving my young grandson, my toilet was left running. My son, who was with my grandson at the time, was not aware of what had happened and thus the water consumption over said period was unduly high. My normal consumption is less than 30 per month.

I brought my concern to the city Manager of Finance and received a rather negative abrupt response. Since I volunteered to install the water meter, I was cooperating with the intent of the City ofRossland. However, had I not installed the water meter, this extra cost would not have occurred. Therefore, I ask that my concern be noted and that the over consumption cost of $84.80 be waived.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Yours truly, ~--

~/ T. C. Johnston

32 of 87

CITY OF ROSS LAND POBOiU79 ROSSLAND BC VOGlYO Phone: (250) 362-7396 Fax: (250} 362-5451

Account #: 100 01900250 000 Service Address: 1220 BLACK BEAR DR

Due Date: 30-Maa·-12

JOHNSTON, JUDITH M AND JOHNSTON, THOMAS C POBOX 1281 ROSSLAND BC VOG lYO

Account#: 100 01900250 000 Service Address: 1220 BLACK BEAR DR

MARCH MONTHLY BILLING

Billing Date: 13-Mar-2012 Bill From: 01-Feb·2012 Batch Number: 2012031301 Bill To: 29-Feb-2012

1111 ~11111m ~1111~ 1~11~~ 11~111~ 1m IIIII ~Ill ~11m IIIII~ II *UB- 1 0001900250000*

Make Cheque Payable to CITY OF ROSS LAND

Enter Amount Enclosed

Ac.count Balance$ 144.58

Amount Due$ 144.58

Billing Date: 13-Mar-2012 Bill From: 01-Feb-2012 Batch Number: 2012031301 Bill To: 29-Feb-2012

Code Description

Account Details From: 13-Mar-2012 From To Units Amount

GMOl MSOI MW01

Monthly Curbside Garbage- Single Unit Single Unit-Sewer Single Unit-Water

Balance Forward As Of: 13-M.ar-2012

31/01112 29/02/12 31/01/12 29/02112 31/01112 29/02112

1.00 1.00 1.00

5.18

7·.02 23.33

109.05 69292711 07/03/12 Current Reading: 523.00 08/02/12 Prev. Reading: 328.00 Consumption: 195.00 CMT

Basic Fee@ 16.75 Consumption'JO.OO@ 0.25000000

71.00@ 0.40000000 94 00 @ 0. 60000000

16.75 7.50

28.40 56.40

109.05

IMPORTANT NOTES

Current Levy

YOU HAVE A NEW ACCOUNT NUMBER. ALL FUTURE PAYMENTS MUST REFLECT THIS CHANGE.

139.40

GARBAGE IS NOW INCLUDED ON YOUR MONTHLY BILL, YOU WILL NO LONGER RECEIVE AN ANNUAL GARBAGE BILL. THE CITY ACCEPTS CASH, CHEQUE, DEBIT CARD, TELEPHONE BANKING, OR ONLINE BANKiNG PAYMENTS. IF YOU SEE A (-)SIGN NEXT TO YOUR TOTAL YOU HAVE A CREDIT BALANCE, PAYMENT IS NOT REQUIRED. IF YOU ARE OVER 65 AND HAVE NOT YET CLAIMED YOUR SENIORS DISCOUNT PLEASE REQUEST IT AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. PLEASE REQUEST YOUR E- BILL BY EMAILING mstevens@rossland.ca. IF THIS IS YOUR FIRST MONTHLY BILLING ON THE NEW WATER METER SYSTEM, YOU WILL HAVE BEEN CHARGED FOR JANUARY AND FEBRUARY.

Account Balance $

Due Date: 30-Mar-12 Amount Due$ Account#: 100 01900250 000

144.58

144.58

CITY OF ROSSLAND POBOX1179

JOHNSTON, JUDITH M AND JOHNSTON, THOMAS C PO BOX 1281

ROSSLAND BC VOGlYO Phone: (250) 362-7396 Fax: (250) J62-5451

ROSSLAND BC VOG I YO

33 of 87

23

Present:

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

J. Drysdale

HERITAGE COMMISSION

M INUTES

Regular Meeting of January 16, 2012 City Hall - Council Chambers

K. Gresley-Jones L. Doell B. Kerby V. Profili

S. lightbourne, Recording Secretary

1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 9:10 am Motion to adopt the agenda. 2. Agenda:

3. Minutes:

Moved by l. Doeii/Seconded by V. Profili

MOTION Moved by V. Profili /Seconded by B. Kirby THAT the minutes for the Heritage Commission meeting held January 16, 2012, be adopted. CARRIED

4. Old Business a) Heritage Week- Press coverage was good but museum visits were limited. b) Budget- Heritage Commission spent $1400 in 2011. c) SOS- Statement of Significance is currently being reviewed by the province. d) RDKB Service Area- J. Drysdale is waiting to hear back from Councilor Wallace regarding the Service area.

5. New Business a) Honarariums- Staff updated Commission on projects involving staff time.

MOTION - Moved by l. Doeii/Seconded by K. Gresley-Jones THAT Dave Nutini receive an honorarium of $100 for additional work on the Columbia Cemetery database. CARRIED

MOTION -Moved by B. Kirby/Seconded by l. Doell THAT Joyce Austin receive an honorarium of $12 per hour-not to exceed $300, for tombstone research for the Columbia Cemetery (from RDKB Cemetery budget) CARRIED

G:WCIIY RUNG SYSTEMW3370.30- Heritage CommissionW2012WMinub!sWMar19_12_Minutesrlnr

34 of 87

24

2

b) Registry Sign age- Completion of Heritage Building sign age. Discussed buildings that should have sign age to apply for 2012 Community Initiatives Grant. Ten buildings were identified.

c) City Website- Has been improved. Staff will continue to update Heritage section of the website.

d) Electronic Registry and Columbia Cemetery GPS work- BC Heritage Branch has a new form for recording Heritage Registry entries due this Spring. GPS work on the Cemetery will continue when database has been updated.

e) Trail Sign age- Waiting for snow to melt.

6. Member Reports/Queries:

- J. Drysdale talked about focusing on Ross Thompson for Golden City Days-2012.

- J. Drysdale would like to identify mining sites surrounding Rossland. s. Ughtbourne to provide a map (3 and 5 mile radius) for Heritage Commission and Dan Werley to identify sites.

8. Next Meeting: April 23, 2012

9. Adjournment: lO:SOam

G:\CITY flUNG SYSTfM\3370.30- Heritage Commlssfon\2012\Minut85\Mar19 _I2_Minutes •.

35 of 87

25

Tracey Butler

From:

Sent:

To:

Victor Kumar

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:07PM

Tracey Butler; Deb Timm

Subject: FW: Unsuccessful Community Recreation Program Application

From: INFRA, CSCD CSCD:EX [mailto:INFRA@gov.bc.ca] Sent: March-26-12 11:52 AM To: Victor Kumar Subject: Unsuccessful Community Recreation Program Application

Victor Kumar Chief Administrative Officer City of Rossland Box 1179 Rossland, BC, VOG lYO

E-Mail: vkumar@rossland.ca

Dear Victor Kumar:

Page 1 ofl

Thank you for your grant application to the Community Recreation Program (Program) with regard to your project Revitalization ofthe Rossland Pool.

I regret to inform you that we were unable to approve funding for your project proposal. As you are likely aware, many of our grant programs are oversubscribed and this Program is no exception. The Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development (Ministry) strives to award limited funds based on the merits of applications received. In addition, the Ministry assesses a project's ability to address the selection criteria of the Program.

I invite you to contact the Ministry's Infrastructure and Finance Branch if this project continues to be a priority for your community. If you wish to discuss in further detail how your application may best meet the objectives for

future programs please contact Ministry staff by phone at: 250-387-4060 or via email at: INFRA@gov.bc.ca.

The Ministry remains steadfast in its commitment to helping communities across the Province of British Columbia

access the resources they need to be economically-resilient and family-friendly.

Thank you for taking the time to apply under the Program.

Sincerely,

Liam Edwards Director

3/28/2012

36 of 87

Federal Budget 2012

Earlier today, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled the 2012 Budget (Economic Action Plan 2012) in the House of Commons. The following excerpts identify measures of interest to BC local governments.

General Government Finances

Reductions in Departmental Spending

• The results of the Government's review of departmental spending amount to roughly $5.2 billion in ongoing savings, representing 6.9 per cent of an aggregate review base of $75.3 billion.

Deficit Reduction Plan • The deficit is projected to fall to $21 .1 billion

for 2012-20113, with a projected surplus by 2015-16.

Community Infrastructure

Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes:

• $150 million over two years for a new Community Infrastructure Improvement Fund to support repairs and improvements to existing community facilities.

• $27.3 million over two years to support the divestiture of regional ports and the continued operation and maintenance of federally owned ports.

• $5.2 billion over the next 11 years on a cash basis to renew the Canadian Coast Guard fleet.

• $101 million over the next five years on a cash basis to restore and modernize the Esquimalt Graving Dock.

• Under the Beyond the Border Action Plan, announced in Fall 2011, the Government will modernize and expand capacity at priority border facilities in Western and Central Canada.

Changes to Regulatory Frameworks New Provisions for Responsible Energy Development • Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $35.7

million over two years to further strengthen Canada's tanker safety regime and support responsible development.

• Measures include: • New regulations which will enhance

the existing tanker inspection regime by strengthening vessel inspection requirement

• Appropriate legislative and regulatory frameworks related to oil spills, and emergency preparedness and response.

• A review of handling processes for oil products by an independent international panel of tanker safety experts.

• Improved navigational products, such as updated charts for shipping routes.

• Research to improve our scientific knowledge and understanding of marine pollution risks, and to manage the impacts on marine resources, habitats and users in the event of a marine pollution incident.

www.ubcm.ca

37 of 87

27

Strengthening Pipeline Safety

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $13.5 million over two years to strengthen pipeline safety~

The Northern Pipeline Agency

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $47 million over two years to the Northern Pipeline Agency, a single window regulatory body to oversee the planning and construction of a major pipeline-the Alaska Pipeline­to transport natural gas from Alaska through Canada to the lower 48 U.S. states.

Amending Mining Regulations

• To address an existing regulatory gap and provide greater certainty for the mining industry in Canada, Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $1 million over two years to Environment Canada to expand Metal Mining Effluent Regulations to non-metal diamond and coal mines.

Review Process for Major Economic Projects

• Economic Action Plah 2012 proposes system­wide legislative improvements to the review process for major economic projects to achieve the goal of ,;one project, one review" in a clearly defined time period for major economic projects.

Major Projects Management Office Initiative

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $54 million over two years to renew the Major Projects Management Office initiative.

Consultation Under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $13.6 million over two years to support consultations with Aboriginal peoples.

Page2

il) THE HOUSE

Removal of Fossil Fuel Subsidies

• To enhance the neutrality of the tax system, tax preferences for resource industries will be phased out.

Economic Development Trade Agreements • The Government is working to conclude

negotiations toward trade agreements with the European Union (EU) and India.

• The Government will continue to engage with China to explore how to best enhance our growing bilateral trade and economic relations.

• In November 2011, the Prime Minister formally indicated Canada's interest in joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations.

• The Government is also expanding relations with the Asia-Pacific region and wants to deepen its commercial presence in Africa.

Support to Fisheries

• $10.5 million in 2012-13 to support key fisheries science activities.

Expanding Tax Support for Clean Energy Generation

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes to expand the eligibility for the accelerated capital cost allowance for clean energy generation equipment to include a broader range of bioenergy equipment.

Connecting Canadians With Available Jobs

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $21 million over two years to connect unemployed Canadians with jobs.

Investing in First Nations Communities

Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes: • Announcing the Government's intent to

explore with interested First Nations the option of moving forward with legislation

www.ubcm.ca

38 of 87

28

that would allow private property ownership within current reserve boundaries.

• Providing $330.8 million over two years to build and renovate on-reserve water infrastructure and support the development of a long-term strategy to improve water quality in First Nations communities.

• Providing $11 .9 million in 2012-13 to support shelter services and violence prevention programming on reserves.

Hiring Credit for Small Business

• Economic Action Plan 2012 proposes $205 million to extend the Hiring Credit for Small Business for one year.

Page3

i 11 THE HOUSE

www.ubcm.ca

39 of 87

29

Tracey Butler

From:

Sent:

Arlene Parkinson [akblg@shaw.ca]

Friday, March 30, 2012 11 :26 AM

Page 1 of1

To: City of Castlegar; 'City of Cranbrook'; City of Fernie; City of Grand Forks; City of Greenwood; City of Kimberley (hharper@city.kimberley.ca); City of Nelson; Tracey Butler; City of Trail; District of Elkford; 'District of lnvermere'; District of Sparwood; Nicole Brown; ROCK; RDEK; RDKB; Town of Creston; Town of Golden; Village of Canal Flats; Village of Fruitvale; Village of Kaslo; Village of Midway; Village of Montrose; 'Village of Nakusp'; Village of New Denver; Village of Radium Hot Springs; Village of Salmo; Village of Silverton; Village of Slocan; Village of Warfield

Cc: Andy Shadrack; Christina Benty (christina.benty@town.golden.bc.ca); cwyers@grandforks.ca; Deb Kozak; Grace McGregor; Rob Gay; taft.gerry@gmail.com; Wesly Graham

Subject: 2012 AKBLG Resolutions for Debate at the 2012 AGM in Trail

Attachments: AGM Minutes Kimberley BC 2011.pdf; UBCM and AKBLG EXEC COMMENTS 2012 AKBLG RESOLUTIONS.pdf

Good afternoon

Please find attached the Minutes of the 2011 AKBLG Annual General Meeting held in Kimberley. Also please find attached the 2012 AKBLG Resolutions submitted for debate at the Annual General Meeting in Trail next month.

The Resolutions will be published in the Annual General Meeting program but will not contain the UBCM Comments. Please add these attachments to your delegate packages for those attending the AGM in Trail.

Thank you for all your help.

Arlene Parkinson Secretary Treasurer Association of Kootenay and Boundary local Governments 250 368-8650 (home office) 250 231-0404 (cell)

3/30/2012

40 of 87

30

MINUTES OF

lfAKBLG

THE ASSOCIATION OF KOOTENAY & BOUNDARY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Annual General Meeting

KIMBERLEY BC APRIL 28, 29 AND 30, 2011

"EMBRACING THE PHOENIX"

41 of 87

31

AKBLGAGM Minutes

EXECUTIVE DELEGATES

DELEGATES

President W esly Graham- Town of Creston, Councillor

April28, 29 30 2011 Page2

Past-President Grace McGregor- Regional District of Kootenay Boundary- Director

Vice-President Andy Shadrack- Regional District of Central Kootenay- Director

Director Christina Benty- Town of Golden- Mayor

Director Kirk Duff- City of Castlegar - Councillor

Director Rob Gay, Regional District of East Kootenay- Director

Director Al Graham, City of Trail- Councillor

Director Deb Kozak, City ofNelson - Councillor

Director Christopher Stevenson- City of Greenwood - Councillor

Parliamentarian Elaine Kumar- RDKB, Director of Corporate Administration

LIFE MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE

2004 Bert Banks 2005 Bill Baird- RDKB 2006 Bev Bellina 2006 Dieter Bogs- City of Trail 2008 Hans Cunningham - RDCK 2005 Gord DeRosa- City of Trail 1996 Jim Ogilvie- City of Kimberley 2009 Heath Slee - RDEK 2010 Joe Snopek

STAFF

Secretary/Treasurer Arlene Parkinson- Village ofWarfield

42 of 87

32

AKBLGAGM Minutes

April28, 29 30 2011 Page3

REGISTERED VOTING DELEGATES

Regional District of Central Kootenay Binks, Lany Cunningham, Hans- Life Member Faust, Ramona Jackman, Garry Kettle, John Mickel, Ron Peterson, Paul Popoff, Walter Shadrack, Andy- AKBLG VP

City of Castlegar Chernoff, Lawrence - Mayor Chernoff, Kevin Duff, Kirk- DIRECTOR AKBLG Hearne, Russ Krueckl, Bernie Mcintosh, Deb Turner, Gord

Town of Creston Folkman, Len Graham, W esly- PRES AKBLG Schmalz, Jerry Wilson, Joanna

Village of Kaslo Lay, Greg, Mayor Cormie, Donna Frary, Tony

Village of Nakusp Hamling, Karen- Mayor Hughes, Joseph

City of Nelson Cherbo, Robin Kozak, Debra- DIRECTOR AKBLG Macdonald, Donna Stacey, Margaret

Village of New Denver Bush, Brent Campbell, Katrine Greensward, Bonnie

Village of Salmo

Village of Silverton Johnson, Ross Main, Leah

Village of Slocan Perriere, Madeleine - Mayor Elliot, Hillary Lunn, Jessica McGreal, Patricia Patterson, Jean

Regional District of East Kootenay Booth, Wendy Gay, Rob- DIRECTOR AKBLG Slee, Heath- Life Member Sosnowski, Mike Wilkie, Gerry

Village of Canal Flats

City of Cranbrook Davis, Angus Pallesen, Denise Schatschneider, Liz Whetham, Bob

District of Elkford McKerracher, Dean- Mayor Conibear, Walter McGregor, Mandy McLean, Shelly Miller, Al Robinson, Craig Wildeman, Ken Zarowney,Joe

City of Fernie Corrigan, Cindy - Mayor

District of Invermere Taft, Gerry- Mayor

43 of 87

33

AKBLGAGM Minutes

Brydon, Ray Campsall, Bob Hawes, Spring

City of Kimberley Ogilvie, Jim- Mayor- Life Member Bunka,Ann Henningson, Mick Hoglund, Albert Weston, Paddy West-Sells, Bob

Village of Radium Hot Springs Conklin, Deirdre- Mayor Reinhardt, Clara

District of Sparwood Banks, Jim Halko, Lois McKie, Margaret

Town of Golden Benty, Christina- Mayor DIR AKBLG Fitzgerald, Jamie Hambruch, Chris Jaswal, Kuljit Moss, Caleb Pecora, Mike

Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Rotvold, Marguerite- Chair Baird, Bill- Life Member McGregor, Grace PAST PRES AKBLG Perepolkin, Irene Worley, Linda

Village of Fruitvale Cecchini, Patricia Gray, Larry Kniss, Bert

City of Grand Forks Taylor, Brian - Mayor Davies, Joy Moslin, Chris Thompson, Christine Wyers, Cher

April 28, 29 30 2011 Page4

City of Greenwood Stevenson, Christopher DIR AKBLG

Village of Midway

Village of Montrose Welsh, Griff- Mayor Danchuk, Joe Duclos, Don

City of Rossland Granstrom, Greg - Mayor Wallace, Kathy

City of Trail Bogs, Dieter - Mayor DeRosa, Gord- Life Member Graham, AI DIR AKBLG

ViUage of Warfield Nelson, Jim - Mayor Baggio, Donna Crockett, Bert Crozier, John Milne, Tom

44 of 87

34

AKBLGAGM Minutes

Columbia Basin Trust Fortis BC BCHydro

SPONSORS

PLATINUM

GOLD

Association for Mineral Exploration British Columbia AMEBC British Columbia Lottery Corporation BCLC College of the Rockies Columbia Power Corporation Mining Association of British Columbia MABC Municipal Finance Authority of BC MFA Municipal Insurance Association of British Columbia MIA Selkirk College

SILVER

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia ICBC Interior Lumber Manufacturers Association ILMA Regional District of East Kootenay RDEK Regional District of Kootenay Boundary RDKB Shaw TECK

BRONZE

Falkins Focus Engineering Murdy & McAllister, Barristers & Solicitors Mysticangel Web Design Paragon Strategic Services Ltd Southern Interior Development Trust Waste Management

April28, 29 30 2011 PageS

45 of 87

35

AKBLGAGM Minutes

April28, 29 30 2011 Page6

ASSOCIATION OF KOOTENAY AND BOUNDARY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MINUTES

PROCEEDINGS OF THURSDAY, APRIT.. 28, 2011

MAYOR OF Mayor Jim Ogilvie welcomed the delegates to the City of Kimberley and KIMBERLEY introduced Council and Staff. MINISTER OF The Honourable Ida Chong welcomed all delegates and presented an COMMUNITY, overview of the Ministry and Provincial Government activities. SPORT AND CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT

PROCEEDINGS OF FRIDAY, APRIL 29, 2011

OPENING Official Community Welcome CEREMONIES First Nations Welcome- Chris Luke

Mayor Jim Ogilvie presented the Official Welcoming Addre~. Hans Cunningham, President of the Federation of Canadian Municipalites presented an FCM update. Barbara Steele, President of the Union ofBC Municipalities presented a UBCM update.

WELCOME President W esly Graham welcomed all to the 781h AKBLG AGM and

introduced the AKBLG Executive and the MIA representative to the membership. President Graham recognized Heath Slee fot the great job he has done in his position at UBCM. President Graham asked all to remember Norman Walter who has passed away. President Graham thanked the Town of Creston for providing meeting space for the AKBLG Executive meetings and Councillor Folkman for continuing to review the AKBLG Financial Statements.

CALL TO ORDER President Wesly Graham, of the Association ofKootenay & Boundary Local Governments called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.

PRESIDENT'S President Wesly Graham presented the President's report REPORT 2011 President's Report:

Welcome to all Delegates attending the 2011 Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Governments Annual General Meeting. This is the 78th AKBLG and it is great that Kimberley has agreed to host us. They have worked hard on this convention and myself along with the rest of the executive say thank-you.

This year has been a busy and challenging year. We have had to deal with a provincial government that hasn't acted on legislation since last spring, and both political parties engaged in a leadership race has basically ground all initiatives to a halt. That affected the way we do business and made it difficult to get the answers and action we needed. As a local government association we have worked hard to get our issues forward and move on the initiatives of the membership.

46 of 87

36

AKBLGAGM Minutes

AGENDA

MINUTES

FINANCIAL REPORT APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS

April28, 29 30 2011 Page?

The AKBLG website is up and with a partnership from RDKB we are getting our executive assistant trained to update the site as needed. We have forged ahead on the CRT committee and will have it formed in the coming weeks.

Your support for me in this roll is greatly appreciated. I have completed my first year as your President and now moving on to my second. I represent you also on the Union of British Columbia Municipalities. This has been an exciting year as I am on the Convention Committee and on the Healthy Communities committee. This keeps me very busy and seems like I travel to Vancouver quite a bit. These are both engaging committees and as mentioned before, the slow doWn at the Provincial Government level has affected our work as well, but we keep our heads down and still work hard for our Delegates so that we don't get over looked.

I recently returned from the AVICC convention. It was a great experience and interesting to watch how the do business. I made note of the resolution sessions and how smooth ours goes now that we have made the changes regarding late resolutions.

I am very grateful for the team of people that form our executive. They are a very dedicated bunch. The input around the table and discussions is very regionally orientated, looking out for all the members that form the AKBLG. I thank all of you very much for your help and devoted service.

Thank you to the members of the AKBLG for trusting me to be your President and it has been an honor to serve you this past year, and look forward to the year ahead. Feel free to contact me any time and raise concerns or just chat. I enjoy listening and figuring out unique solutions to the problems that face us.

Respectfully submitted

Wesly Graham

President

On regular motion, duly moved and seconded the 2011 Annual General Meeting Agenda was adopted as circulated.

On regular motion, duly moved and seconded the 2010 Annual General Meeting Minutes were adopted as circulated. On regular motion, duly moved and seconded the 2010 Financial Report was adopted. On regular motion, duly moved and seconded the following Scrutineers were approved: Corien Speaker, District of Elk[ord and Victor Kumar, City of Ross/and

47 of 87

37

AKBLGAGM Minutes

NOMINATIONS

CALL FOR ELECTION

RESOLUTIONS

RESOLUTION 1

April28, 29 30 2011 PageS

Past President Grace McGregor, Chair of the Nominations Committee presented the Nominations Committee Report. She called for further nominations and there were none at this time.

The Nominations Committee put forward the following names for Director:

Duff, Kirk, City of Castlegar Kozak, Debra- City of Nelson Stevenson, Christopher- City of Greenwood Taft, Gerry- District oflnvermere

The Nominations Chair called for further nominations for Director, and the following were duly nominated and accepted.

Wyers, Cher- City of Grand Forks

Election for the position ofDireetor of AKBLG will be held Saturday, April 30, 2011 between 8:45am and 10:00 am PST

HARMONIZED SALES TAX & PENSION PLANS -VILLAGE OF MONTROSE

WHEREAS the 2010 federal government amendments to the Excise Tax Act has impacted employers such that they will be required to remit Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) on the "deemed supply" (service) they provide to pension plans;

AND WHEREAS the expansion of scope pertaining to how the government views similar services involving municipal staff time in the future is a concern for the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities engage in discussions with the Province of British Columbia to have this service exempted from the Harmonized Sales Tax.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

48 of 87

38

A.KBLGAGM Minutes

RESOLUTION 2

April28, 29 30 2011 Page9

MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OVER WATERWAYS· VILLAGE OF KASLO

WHEREAS the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments feels that municipal control of surface of the water will be effective in addressing issues such as noise and environmental pollution, proximity of boats to shore, types of boats allowed on the water, and boat moorage locations:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments through the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, lobby for more control over provincial and federal waterways adjacent to and within municipalities.

ON MOTION, was REFERRED TO EXECUTIVE

RESOLUTION 3

TRAVEL EXPENSE FOR PARTICIPATING IN UBCM COMMITTEE MEETINGS - DISTRICT OF ELKFORD

WHEREAS the local government officers and employee~ are asked to sit on various committees formed by the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, with the local governments covering all travel expenses to participate in committee meetings;

AND WHEREAS travel expenses for elected officials to participate in the committees are the responsibility of the Union ofBritish Columbia Municipalities:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union ofBritish Columbia Municipalities be requested to provide reimbursement for travel expenses for the local government officers and employees participating in the Union of British Columbia Municipalities committee meetings.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 4

AMENDMENT TO SECTION 167 OF THE COMMUNITY CHARTER­CITY OF CRANBROOK

WHEREAS Section 167 of the Community Charter requires a municipality to prepare annual financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for local government as prescribed by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants;

49 of 87

39

AKBLGAGM Minutes

April28, 29 30 2011 Page 10

AND WHEREAS Section 167 of the Community Charter also states that in addition to the requirements for annual fmancial statements, the Inspector may require municipalities to provide additional financial information:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities request that the Province of British Columbia amend Section 167 of the Community Charter by deleting the requirement to provide an additional fmancial statement requested by the Inspector.

ON MOTION, was NOT ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 5

CARBON NEUTRAL OBLIGATIONS· CITY OF CRANBROOK

WHEREAS municipalities who are signators to the British Columbia Climate Action Charter have made a non binding commitment (Section 9) to "being carbon neutral in respect of their operations by 2012";

AND WHEREAS the only practical means to achieve a carbon neutral status, following all reasonable actions to reduce carbon emissions, is to purchase carbon off-sets:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities provide clear direction on the following:

• The source, form, rationalized cost and understandable description of legitimate "carbon off-sets".

• The allocation and anticipated expenditure of revenues generated by local municipalities purchasing qualified carbon off-sets and paid to an organization sanctioned by the BC government such as the Pacific Carbon Trust (a Crown Corporation).

• The options or opportunities to establish local or regional "trusts" (or other means), administered locally, to hold and then direct carbon off-set revenues to local or regional qualified carbon off-set projects.

• The rationale for NOT crediting local municipalities, who own and/or operate

lands and/or facilities which would otherwise be considered carbon "sinks", with

a reasonable estimation of "carbon" sequestered by the operation and credited

against "carbon" released by municipal operations, therefore reducing the NET carbon emissions.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 6

50 of 87

40

AKBLGAGM Minutes

April28, 29 30 2011 Page I 1

ELIMINATION OF MSP PREMIUMS· CITY OF KIMBERLEY

WHEREAS all seniors living in British Columbia must pay Medical Service Plan (MSP) premiums and with the elimination ofMSP premiums, BC seniors would have more money for healthy living;

AND WHEREAS many retirees of the Municipal Pension Plan are former employees of local and regional governments:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Association ofKootenay and Boundary Local Governments through the Union ofBritish Columbia Municipalities support the retir~s· of the Municipal Pension Plan by agreeing to the elimination ofMSP premiums for all British Columbia Seniors (65 years and older)

ON MOTION, with amendment as recommended, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 7

ASSESSMENT & TAXATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND· CITY OF KIMBERLEY

WHEREAS when determining the actual value of property for taxation, Section 19(3)(h) of the Assessment Act states that the assessor may give consideration to any other circumstances affecting the value of the land and improvements, which includes the physical condition of property and the extent to which it is contaminated;

AND WHEREAS by causing or allowing the contamination of their own property, some industrial taxpayers obtain a substantial reduction in their tax burden while creating inequality among industrial taxpayers and reducing the overall level of taxation available to municipal governments:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments through the Union of British Columbia Municipalities petition the Province of British Columbia to adopt appropriate legislation to require the assessor, when determining the actual value of property for an assessment roll, to disregard evidence of existing contamination caused or contributed to by industrial processes carried out by the owner on the property or on an adjacent or associated industrial property of the owner.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

51 of 87

41

AKBLGAGM Minutes

RESOLUTION 8

April28, 29 30 2011 Page 12

REPEAL SECTIONS 420-427 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT· CITY OF GRAND FORKS

WHEREAS administration of Sections 420 to 427 of the Local Government Act is onerous and costly to local governments;

AND WHEREAS the provisions of the Surveyor of Taxes Forfeiture Cycle are clear, concise and do not provide for the involvement of third parties:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments through the Union of British Columbia Municipalities petition the Province of British Columbia to repeal Sections 420 to 427 of the Local Government Act and replace it with provisions similar to those of the Surveyor of Taxes Forfeiture Cycle, and that those provisions ensure that any unredeemed properties revert to the municipality.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 9

INSUFFICIENT FUNDING OF HEALTH AUTHORITIES· REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL KOOTENAY

WHEREAS the provincial government has now created capital projects priority criteria that grants up to twenty bonus points to regional hospital boards that are prepared to fund up to 90% of capital projects costs;

AND WHEREAS such policies will create a two-tier medical facilities situation in British Columbia between those regional hospital boards that can afford to raise more capital via higher property taxes and those boards that cannot:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments request that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities register a strong protest with the provincial government, especially the Minister of Health, with regard-to ongoing attempts by the provincial government to download its capital funding responsibilities, via insufficient funding of health authorities that burden property taxpayers, when they already pay for this capital funding via income taxes.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED RESOLUTION 10

52 of 87

42

AK.BLGAGM Minutes

April 28, 29 30 2011 Page 13

FIRST LINE FIRE TRUCK REPLACEMENT GUIDELINES · REGIONAL DISTRICT OF EAST KOOTENAY

WHEREAS the Fire Underwriters Survey requires that all first line fire apparatus (fire trucks) for small communities and rural centres be replaced after 20 years in order to retain fire insurance grading recognition for that apparatus;

AND WHEREAS flre apparatus in small communities and rural centres is still in excellent condition after 20 years due to very low hours of operational use; the cost apply for a limited extension past 20 years is not economical; and the cost of replacement of first line fire apparatus every 20 years in onerous on taxpayers:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities lobby for change to the Fire Underwriters Survey requirements for replacement for first line fite apparatus such as fire trucks and other flre fighting vehicles to ease the fmancial burden to taxpayers in small and rural centres.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 11

DESIGN OF GRANT PROGRAMS • REGIONAL DISTRICT OF EAST KOOTENAY

WHEREAS most federal and provincial funding/grant programs are based on an application process that is time consuming and costly and the programs result in competition between and within local governments for a limited amount of funds;

AND WHEREAS local governments have the most knowledge of the needs of their communities, are responsible for setting the priorities for projects deserving of funding within their respective jurisdiction, and have proven, through the Community Works program, that they are capable of adhering to criteria assigned to funding by agreement:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities petition for a change to the criteria for federal and provincial funding/grant programs that would result in available fund being distributed to all local governments, based on a pre­set formula appropriate for the particular funding program.

ON MOTION, was NOT ENDORSED

53 of 87

43

AKBLGAGM Minutes

RESOLUTION 12

April28, 29 30 2011 Page 14

FIRE & POLICE SERVICES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT· CITY OF NELSON

WHEREAS the Fire and Police Services Collective Bargaining Act was enacted over fifteen years ago with the goal of facilitating collective bargaining with fire and police;

AND WHEREAS the results are that the Act has not lead to improved collective bargaining rather it has resulted in the parties invariably ending up at an impasse and the collective agreement being settled through binding arbitration with awards that are not in line with the economic reality of British Columbia communities:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities request that the Minister of'Labour review the impact of the Fire and Police Services Collective Bargaining Act on collective bargaining to determine ifit has met its goals that were established at the time.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 13

REGULATION OF INSTALLATION OF SIGNS, SPEED & PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES· CITY OF ROSSLAND

WHEREAS the Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure has the legislative authority to make and issue regulations under the Transportation Act;

AND WHEREAS the Minister may make regulations respecting the use of provincial public highways by persons or vehicles:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union ofBritish Columbia Municipalities request that a municipal Council may, by a bylaw with the approval of the Minister, be granted the legislative authority to regulate the installation of signs, regulations of speed and pedestrian crossings on arterial highways within the municipal boundaries.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 14

BC HYDRO FAIR COMPENSATION· AKBLG EXECUTIVE

54 of 87

44

AKBLGAGM Minutes

April 28, 29 30 2011 Page 15

WHEREAS Crown Corporations are expected to pay their fair share of property taxes by providing a grant-in-lieu;

AND WHEREAS private utilities pay property taxes to municipalities and regional districts on property including rights-of-way for distribution and transmission lines, and private utilities and BC Hydro provide municipalities a 1% tax on gross sales revenues within their jurisdictions:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the AKBLG and the UBCM lobby the Province of British Columbia to explore the taxation ofBC Hydro and implement a fair and equitable method of compensation to all local governments for the provision oflocal and regional services.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 15

INTEREST RATE ON ARREARS & DELINQUENT TAXES- VILLAGE OF SALMO

WHEREAS the Lieutenant Governor establishes interest rates on taxes in arrears or delinquent by adding three percent to the prime lending rate;

AND WHEREAS local governments may be owed outstanding taxes which cause a hardship to operate within a budget:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities urge the Lieutenant Governor to increase the interest rate on arrears and delinquent taxes to an interest rate comparable to consumer debt.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 16

GRANT PROGRAMS FOR REGIONAL DISTRICTS- REGIONAL DISTRICT OF KOOTENAY BOUNDARY

WHEREAS the Province ofBritish Columbia and the Government of Canada have introduced many grant programs such as Towns for Tomorrow;

AND WHEREAS the most recent version of the Towns for Tomorrow Program limited regional districts to one application only:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities lobby the provincial government to recognize the unique nature of regional districts and

55 of 87

45

AKBLGAGM Minutes

April28, 29 30 2011 Page 16

to allow regional Boards to endorse and submit up to one application per electoral area for Towns for Tomorrow.

ON MOTION, with amendment as recommended was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 17

PROVINCIAL CHILDCARE FUNDING • CITY OF FERNIE

WHEREAS the province of British Columbia has the highest level of child poverty in the country;

AND WHEREAS affordable quality childcare plays a central role in the economic and emotional health of families and children:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government significantly increase funding to childcare as part of a concerted effort to reduce child poverty and strengthen the economy of British Columbia.

ON MOTION, was ENDORSED

RESOLUTION 18

SCRAP METAL LICENSING & REGULATING- CITY OF GREENWOOD

WHEREAS damage and loss resulting from the theft of metals costs British Columbia millions of dollars each year;

AND WHEREAS there are no mechanisms in place to regulate, control, monitor and enforce the market for scrap metal that provides the economic basis for metal theft, vandalism and property crime:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities lobby the provincial government to implement a system to licence & regulate the scrap metal economy in British Columbia and to consider mandating the Produ<;t Stewardship Program with responsibility to implement and monitor these regulations.

ON MOTION, with amendment as recommended, was ENDORSED

56 of 87

46

AKBLGAGM Minutes

RESOLUTION 19

April28, 29 30 2011 Page 17

RECYCLING DEPOSIT & REFUND SYSTEM EXPANSION- CITY OF GREENWOOD

WHEREAS the recycling of tires, batteries and other items benefits the environment, economy and society;

AND WHEREAS the Return-It beverage refund-deposit system achieves the highest return rate for recyclable materials in the Province, by providing a direct incentive to users to recycle items and materials:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities petition the provincial government to mandate the expansion of deposit and refund systems currently used for beverage containers to other recyclables.

ON MOTION, was REFERIU:D TO EXECUTIVE

RESOLUTION 20

REMUNERATION OF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS- CITY OF GREENWOOD

WIIEREAS local elected officials are responsible for adjusting their own pay/remuneration/ compensation;

AND WHEREAS elected officials should not have the power to or responsibility for adjusting their own remuneration:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union ofBritish Columbia Municipalities lobby the provincial government to work with the Union of British Columbia Municipalities to establish an independent, automatic, universal mechanism for adjusting remuneration/compensation for local elected officials.

ON MOTION, was NOT ENDORSED

UBCM NAME CHANGE- AKBLG EXECUTIVE

WHEREAS the Association of Vancouver Island and Coastal Communities, the Lower Mainland Local Government Association, the Southern Interior Local Government Association, the North Central Local Government Association and the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments have all changed their names to reflect local governments working together;

57 of 87

47

AK.BLGAGM Minutes

April 28, 29 30 2011 Page 18

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities change their name to the Union of British Columbia Local Governments.

ON MOTION, was REFERRED TO EXECUTIVE

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF OUR WATER RESOURCES- AKBLG EXECUTIVE

WHEREAS effective regulation and management of our Provfnce's finite water resources is vital to our ecology, environment and economic future; and

WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia no longer has a dedicated appointee whose primary function is to work with the wide variety of stakeholders who have a keen interest in the effective management of our water resources.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Province of British Columbia, and namely the Premier of our Province, appoint a Member of the Legislature with the responsibility of working with stakeholders to effectively, responsibly and efficiently manage our water resources at the Minister of State level or higher.

ON MOTION, WAS REFERRED TO EXECUTIVE

LAST CALL FOR Past President McGregor, Nominations Chair, asked for the third NOMINATIONS and last time for nominations for Director. There were no further

nominations for Director. At this time nominations for Directors were closed.

2012 and 2013 HOST Past President McGregor informed dele~ates that there were several MUNICIPALITIES offers for future Hosts. She called three times for further bids for

hosting the 2012 Convention. 2012 AGM and Convention Host- City of Trail 2013 AGM and Convention Host- Columbia Valley

DIRECTORS The Directors of the A.KBLG for the next 2 year term (20 11-20 13) were elected in order of votes as follows: Debra Kozak, City ofNelson Kirk Ouff, City of Castlegar Taft, Gerry, District of Invermere Stephenson, Christopher, City of Greenwood

CREDENTIALS Attending voting Delegates 105 REPORT Attending Non-voting Delegates 39

Life Members 9 Partners 27 Guests 29

58 of 87

48

AKBLGAGM Minutes

ADJOURNMENT

April28, 29 30 2011 Page 19

The 2011 Annual General Meeting was adjourned at 12:00 p.m. PST

59 of 87

49

RESOW'TION #1

rn8TIUCT Of INVERMBRB

Wl-mRBAe provineiallegislatioft aftd local regieRal disb'iet bylaws do Rot provide adequate protectioo fof conunllftity "Natersfl.eds aftd water st:tpplies:

THEREFORB BE IT RFbOVIID that UBCM request tfte prm•iftcial go7remmeRt to amend a:U. applieable legislatioft in order to iMrease tl:le power of local govei'Hffients and 'llatCf" st:tppliers to manage iHl:d eoAb'ollaHds SUffOUftdi:ag and inflt:lefteiftg eOiflffi\:lnity watCf'Bkeds aftd water supplies.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

Refer back to the District of lnvermere.

This ~615 sw~mit#ed H3 UBC..\4 in 2Q11 616 61 hlle Yeselwtien, hwt did net meet the tYi~ t6 he Rdmitled ffJY t.lebilte 616 Rn ema-~ey 1'e66lwtien. ln kel!fJil'fg ~ith UBCM. peliey1 the 186elwtien has hefM'l 1~rwtilf'ded te the Aretl As56cilditmfo1' e61'1Bitleratien 616 p611't of #he 2Q12 1'~elwtiens

~

UBCM memhel'S have consistently e11doYBe6i resolwtiens YelRted t6 preteetien e-jeemmw11ity wideYshe615, inelwdiHg pesticitle &pf'RYil'fg, leggiNg Rdi'EJities, Rnd Ye6fl:le5#6 feY gttetlteYieeal RWtheYily e'EJer whRt «ti&ities take place within"'. Wfilte1'shed (1988 A26; 1989 AlB; 1990 All; 1996 B13; 1998 B65; 1999 B63; 2QQ4 884; 2QQ4 885; 20Q4 ~; 2005 B27; 2QQ6 8102; 2007 B26; 2Q07 842; 2007 B12lj 2008 B27; 2008 835; 2009 8136).

l11 1'e&peme to Yesehttion 2008 B35, tk8 pYeviNCiRl gsvemmeJ~~t stRted its "eemmitment te mswf'e potable Rndseel:lf'e wRteY Sl:lf119lies,for hoth hwman censwmptien Rnd eeesystem susttlimlhility" Rna Feje1'el'leed #le Action PIRI'l fer bllft DAnki1'1g WRier (2Q02) Rnd Living Y.hler~ttU~rt Pll>ll'l (2Q08), filS well aslegi61Rti&e SWJ9perte pre&ided 9y the DRnlang T,t\hter Preleeti61'l Aet filM the Y.hter Act.

In teR9f:5 efleCRI gBTJeR'fment €61'19-ele&er fileti:eities in WRtefeeheds, the Pre'Elinee swggeeted that wriewe "pYs&ineiRllegielRtien l>lnd p'16gt'Rm5 i1'1clwde 61 nwmher efPf~evisiel'ls thRt eowld eNRhle leCRI ge&ernments te &eFCiee mere cel'ltrel m7er th96e filretfS". The legis1Rti819 6lnd p1egrams inelwt.le the Drif'fkil'lg Waler Pretec#en Act; WRter Aet; Y:Hife1' mRNRgBment plRm; memertmdR ef l:l1'1ReP:5t6l1'1Fili1'fg; 611'161 cemmwnityfereste.

60 of 87

50

RESOLUTION#2

CHANGES TO THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA TO MAKE THE SEXUAL OFFENDER REGISTRY PUBUC

DISTRICT OF SP ARWOOD

WHEREAS Council for the District of Sparwood supports Kootenay-Columbia MP David Wilks' introduction of a petition to the House of Commons in early November that seeks a strengthening of laws to protect children;

AND WHEREAS on November 29, 2011, MP David Wilks moved to give second reading in the House of Commons of his Private Member's Bill, C-299, "An Act to amend the Criminal Code (kidnapping of young person)":

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM appeal to the Government of Canada to make necessary changes to the Criminal Code of Canada to make the National Sex Offender Registry public.

AK8LG EXECUTWE COMMENTS:

The AK.BLG Executive recognizes that there needs to be debate on this resolution because it has never been considered before. The implications to loct:Zl governments as well as to re-habilitated offenders need to be understood.

The AK8LC Executive has no recommendation.

UBCM comments:

The U8CM membership has not previously considered a resolution calling on the federal government to amend the Criminal Code to make the National Sex Offender Registry public.

Members did, however, endorse resolutions 1993-837 and 1992-864, which called for the establishment of the National Sex Offender Registry.

61 of 87

51

RESOLUTION #3 &16

BC CONSERVATION SERVICE CAPACITY VILLAGE OF NEW DENVER

WHEREAS the provincial government is responsible for managing bears through its Conservation Service, and the BC Conservation Service has not been able to adequately address bear-human conflict in municipalities due to lack of capacity;

AND WHEREAS municipalities are unable to appropriately respond to bear-human conflict, as their role is to enact policies that deter wildlife and limit wildlife attractants:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government be requested to provide adequate funding and staffing in order for the BC Conservation Service to be more active and proactive in effectively managing bear-human conflict in communities across BC.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive has requested that th.is resolution be merged with Resolution #16 Grand Forks.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has consistently endorsed resolutions that request the provincial government to increase funding and the numbers of conservation officers for the management of bears and other wildlife (2011-B42; 2010-B25; 2004-B81; 2003-B32; 2002-B53; 1996-B27; 1996-B64; 1992-B35).

In response to resolution 2010-B25, which called on the provincial government to "put more resources into wildlife management areas in which both rural and urban wildlife is a significant problem", the Province highlighted some of the tools it has developed to help communities find effective solutions to urban wildlife conflicts, including the Wildlife Conflict Prevention Strategy, the Bear Smart Communities Program, and the Urban Ungulates Conflict Analysis report.

The provincial government further referenced legislation that is intended to prevent the feeding of species such as bears, as well as enabling legislation to prohibit the feeding of deer in specified areas. weal governments, the Province pointed out, "need to better understand and support and where appropriate help enforce such regulations. Without proper attractant management, no amount of wildlife relocations, euthanization or other management strategies will be effective in reducing urban wildlife conflicts". The Province· indicated willingness to "assist in managing this problem through joining committees, attending municipal meetings, providing expert advice and assisting in the implementation of management strategies to help reduce the scope of this problem".

62 of 87

52

RESOLUTION #4

FIRESMART CANADA/PARTNERS IN PROTECTION VILLAGE OF KASLO

WHEREAS the Village of Kaslo municipal boundaries border on forested crown land with dangerous accumulations of forest fuels posing a significant risk to the community should a wildfire event occur which inundates the Village with ember showers;

AND WHEREAS many similar rural communities and small municipalities lack financial and organizational resources to effectively deliver a FireSm~rt Canada/Partners in Protection program for their communities:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM establish a working relationship with FireSmart Canada/Partners in Protection in order to assist its members with implementing this critical" community fire smart" program.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends the amendment of the addition of "community fire smart" and then endorsement.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has not previously considered a resolution asking UBCM to establish a working relationship with FireSmart Canada/Partners in Protection in order to assist UBCM members to implement that program in their communities.

The membership endorsed a similar resolution, 2010-B59, which requested that the Province "initiate a Fire Smart Canada Community Program similar to the Fire Wise program in the United States and the Partners in Protection Fire Smart Canada proposal".

The provincial government in response to the resolution encouraged communities to adopt Fire Smart activities and actions and participate in the Strategic Wildfire Prevention program in order to mitigate the threat of wildfires. At the time, the Province indicated that it was "exploring the opportunity to recognize communities that are leaders in Fire Smart and community wildfire protection planning".

The federal government responded to the resolution by citing the Canadian Wildland Fire Strategy as a collaborative effort between the federal government, provinces and territories to "address the potential threat wildfires can pose to public safety, property and vital natural resources through a cohesive risk management framework". In addition, the federal government listed investments in wildfire prevention via the First Nations Forestry Program, the Community Adjustment Fund, and the Mountain Pine Beetle Program. Further, the federal government clarified that "all national parks in British Columbia are using or planning to use FireS mart techniques to reduce wildfire risk".

63 of 87

53

RESOLUTION #5 & #6

PROPER "HOT SPOT"SIGNAGE AND SAFE PULL-OUTS FOR CELL PHONE COVERAGE AREAS

CITY OF GREENWOOD

WHEREAS much of today's travelling public is dependent on the technology of cell phone service etc., to not only stay in touch with family members but for added safety features for emergency reasons;

AND WHEREAS many areas within cell phone coverage in rural BC are not identified;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that proper signage and safe pull-outs be installed in areas throughout BC where coverage is available identifying it as a "hotspot" with cell phone connectivity.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends combining Resolution #5 with Resolution #6

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has not previously considered a resolution calling for signage to indicate areas where mobile phone coverage is available.

At present, the travelling public may not know when and where in the province thetj can expect mobile phone connectivity. The sponsor has expressed the hope that such signage would "help people make necessary calls prior to a no connectivity area".

64 of 87

54

RESOLUTION #6 See Resolution #5

SAFE PULLOUTS FOR CELL PHONE USE CITY OF GREENWOOD

WHEREAS communication via internet/ cell phones has become such a huge part of today's world with everyone needing to stay connected;

AND WHEREAS many rural areas in our Province are lacking in service and quite often do not have safe places to pull over and use cell phones:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that all future highway construction irt the Province of British Columbia include safe pullouts so drivers can pull over safely without having to risk the threat of an accident on our highway.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends combining this resolution with Resolution #5

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has not pr(!viously considered a resolution calling on the provincial government to ensure that all future highway construction in the province of British Columbia include pullouts so that drivers can pull over safely to use mobile phones alongside the highway.

65 of 87

55

RESOLUTION #7

ASSESSMENT & TAXATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND CITY OF KIMBERLEY

WHEREAS when determining the actual value of property for taxation, Section 19(3)(h) of the Assessment Act states that the assessor may give consideration to any other circumstances affecting the value of the land and improvements, which includes the physical condition of property and the extent to which it is contaminated;

AND WHEREAS by causing or allowing the contamination of their own property, some industrial taxpayers obtain a substantial reduction in their tax burden while creating inequality among industrial taXpayers and reducing the overall level of taxation available to municipal governments:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM petition the Province of British Columbia to adopt appropriate legislation to require the assessor, when determining the actual value of property for an assessment roll, to disregard evidence of existing contamination caused or contributed to by industrial processes carried out by the owner on the property or on an adjacent or associated industrial property owner.

AK8LG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AK8LG Executive does not recommend endorsement.

U8CM comments:

The U8CM membership has consistently endorsed resolutions requesting that the assessment of a property's value not be reduced by evidence of existing contamination, particularly in cases where the contamination has been caused by or contributed to by the owner of the property (2011-837, 2005-821, 1996-ERS).

In response to resolution 2011-837, the provincial government confirmed that "BC Assessment is required to assess properties at their market value" and explained that the assessment "takes into account the current state of the property as well as the remediation required to achieve the intended use of the site and the time frame for any redevelopment. The assessed value must reflect the likely cost of remediation and the time frame required for that remediation ... ".

66 of 87

56

RESOLUTION #8 & #13

STRATEGIC WILDFIRE PREVENTION INITIATIVE FUNDJNG CITY OF KIMBERLEY

WHEREAS the Provincial Fuel Management Working Group has changed the funding formula for fuel management programs to disallow the leveraging of UBCM Strategic Wildfire Prevention Program Initiative dollars by using accrued grant totals (spent money) from the federal and provincial governments or accrued in-kind contributions from local government;

AND WHEREAS local governments are very hard pressed to find new local tax money to fund their share of operating fuel management projects:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities work to change the funding formula and restore the ability of local governments to use recently expended funds and in-kind contributions to leverage new Strategic Wildfire Prevention Program Initiative dollars.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends cqmbining this resolution with Resolution #13 Regional District of Central Kootenay.

U8CM comments:

U8CM resolution 2011-8139 dealt with the Strategic Wildfire Prevention Program, specifically requesting that the provincial government:

€ restore the contribution of the cost of eligible activities for tire Strategic Wildfire Prevention Program to 100%; and € expand the definition of in-kind costs to include activities undertaken by community groups assisting local governments.

The U8CM membership referred resolution 2011-8139 to the U8CM Executive, and after consideration, the Executive referred the resolution to the Provincial Fuel Management Working Group so that the working group could consider the resolution as part of their ongoing review of the program.

The Provincial Fuel Management Working Group manages the Strategic Wildfire Prevention Initiative, and working group membership includes the Ministry of Forests, Lands & Natural Resource Operations, First Nations Emergency Services Society and Union of8C Municipalities.

Since the close of the original program in December 2010, the working group reviewed the original program with the goal of strengthening program transparency, accountability and efficiency. The revisions that were made to the 2011 program were based on this review and reflected the intent of the working group to create a sustainable fuel management program.

One change implemented in the 2011 program was discontinuation of the CEcredit Stjsteml in order to:

67 of 87

57

€ ensure that community contributions are directly related to wildfire prevmtion projects under the new program; € increase accountability in tlte expenditure of public funds; and € ensure clear and accurate reporting of community contributions.

Under the new program local governments have a wide variety of opportunities to provide in-kind contributions to operational fuel treatment projects, including such things as grants from other sources directly related to the project, staff time to manage contracts, and development of public information materials and signage.

See also resolution #13.

68 of 87

58

RESOLUTION #9

PROVINCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY CITY OF TRAIL

WHEREAS public transportation and commercial passenger vehicles are critical components of a network for the efficient movement of peoplet but that commercial operators of passenger directed vehicles in rural communities face unique challenges in terms of developing and sustaining economically viable operations due to inconsistent ridership demand, which can result in reduced levels of service available to the public;

AND WHEREAS the integration of a service to incorporate passenger directed vehicles with traditional public transportation may create synergies and increase the viability for these operations; improving the access to and availability of passenger directed vehicles in rural communities:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities request that the Province of BC develop a transportation strategy to critically assess and determine solutions towards the sustainability of passenger directed vehicle operations in rural communities.

AKBLG EXECUTWE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends refe"al back to the Citjt of Trail for clarification.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has not previously considered a resolution requesting that the provincial government develop a transportation strategtj to assess and determine solutions towards the sustainability of passenger directed vehicle operations in rural communities.

69 of 87

59

RESOLUTION #10

TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRE REQUIREMENTS VILLAGE OF SILVERTON

WHERAS the BC Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and hmovation requires Tourist Information Centres to be open, full time from the May long weekend through to the September long weekend;

AND WHEREAS small communities often lack the financial resources to fund Tourist Information Centres for this period of time on a full time basis:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government reconsider the requirement that Tbt.I.rist Information Centres in small communities, be open full-time, for this period of time.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends endorsement.

UBCM comments:

While this resolution seeks to change the requirements around when and how long info centres must remain open in order to receive funding, the root of the problem does appear to be a lack of funding overall. In this vein, the sponsor has provided background information that indicates that the Chamber of Commerce in the sponsor's community has incurred deficits to keep the info centre open.

The UBCM membership endorsed resolution A7 in 2005 requesting the provincial government to increase funding for community Visitor Information Centres (VICs) from $1.15 million per year to at least $3 million per year, in accordance with a November 2004 review ofVICs undertaken by the BC Chamber of Commerce.

In response to resolution 2005-Al the provincial government stated that it had initiated improvements to its Visitor lnfoNetwork program, increasing funding from $1.5 million to approxirntltely $3 million.

70 of 87

60

RESOLUTION #11

MOUNTAIN RESORT MUNICIPALITIES DISTRICT OF INVERMERE

WHEREAS the Community Services Statutes Amendment Act, 2007, sections 16 and 17 allow the provincial government to establish an area that is not a mountain resort improvement district and potentially has no residents and no development, as a new Mountain Resort Municipality, and allow the Province to appoint the council and direct the development decisions of that council through letters patent and exemptions from the Communitt; Charter;

AND WHEREAS a Mountain Resort Municipality may never grow to have a large enough pennanent poptilation to have an elected council, and could remain an unelected and provincially an<;l developer controlled "municipality" forever:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities oppose the concept of an undemocratic municipality controlled by the Province and developer, and urge the Province to consult with UBCM on creating reasonable criteria to guide the establishment of new Mountain Resort Municipalities.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends endorsement.

UBCM comments:

In 2007 the UBCM membership endorsed resolution 86_7, which requested that Bill11 (Community Services Statutes Amendment Act, 2007) be amended so that the designation of a resort region and the establishment of a resort municipality would be contingent upon the support of the affected regional district by resolution and the consent of residents and property owners within the regional district by referendum.

In its response to the resolution the Province stated:

"Section 11 (2.1) provides the Minister with the authority to recommend the incorporation of an area as a mountain resort municipality without a vote. This section could be used to incorporate remote, unpopulated areas that have considerable potential for large scale, alpine ski develapment. This option would only be used in rare circumstances where it is in the provincial interest. The section is modelled on existing provisions in the Local Government Act to incorporate resource municipalities such as Tumbler Ridge. These provisions also did not provide for regional district or voter approval.

The intention is that the legislation would be used to enable the incorporation of alpine areas that have the potential to become world class resorts much like was accomplished through the creation of the Resort Municipality of Whistler in 1975 through special legislation.

In addition, as a matter of policy, the site should be remote or not adjacent to an existing municipality, a large size and one where other reasonable governance options are not available.

The lrgislation does not provide the regional district or citizens with a ltgislated role. However, it is the province's policy with developments of this kind that there be extensive engagement with local governments and the public."

71 of 87

61

RESOLUTION #12

RAW LOG EXPORTS TOWN OF CRESTON

WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia has allowed a sharp and sustained rise in the volume. of exported timber, which has distorted the domestic price structure for logs, eliminated British Columbia manufacturing jobs, undermined the structural integrity of the forest industry and severely hampered the creation of jobs and economic opportunities in the province;

AND WHEREAS these policies have had a devastating impact on many local communities across the province that rely on the forest industry:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities forward this resolution to the Province of British Columbia, indicating its objection to any measures that would increase the export of raw logs from British Columbia.

AKBLG EXECUTWE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends endorsement.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has endorsed previous resolutions related to raw log exports.

In 2001, members endorsed resolution B31, requesting the provincial government to ban the export of raw logs from British Columbia. Prior to 2001, UBCM members also endorsed late resolution 1999-LRlO which stated that UBCM does not support the shipping of raw logs outside the province of BC to be manufactured into wood products and requested the Province to take steps to address this issue.

72 of 87

62

RESOLUTION #13 &#8

FULL FUNDING FOR FUEL ABATEMENT REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL KOOTENAY

WHEREAS certain Crown forest lands located in regional district electoral areas and adjacent to mtmicipal boundaries present a significant risk to communities from catastrophic wildfire events which may inundate communities with volatile ember showers;

AND WHEREAS management of these forest lands, including forest fuel loading, is ultimately the responsibility of the Province of British Columbia through the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations and that said Ministry has fully funded fuel abatement measures in the past but no longer does so:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations be called upon to reinstate its former policy of providing full funding for fuel abatement on Crown forest lands located in regional district electoral areas and adjacent to mtmicipal boundaries.

AKBLG EXECUTNE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive recommends combining this resolution with Resolution #8 CihJ of Kimberletj.

UBCM Comments:

The UBCM membership has not previously considered a resolution requesting the province to reinstate its former policy of providing full funding for fuel abatement on Crown forest lands located in regional district electoral areas and adjacent to municipal boundaries.

The Strategic Wildfire Prevention Initiative is managed through the Provincial Fuel Management Working Group- including the Ministry of Forests, Lands & Natural Resource Operations, First Nations Emergency Services Society and Union of BC Municipalities.

The 2003 Filmon Report acknowledged the need for all levels of government and individuals to share the responsibility for fireproofing communities that may be affected by interface fires. Consequently, the Strategic Wildfire Prevention Initiative was established to support local government activities related to reducing wildfire risk to their communities

The original program ran from 2004 to 2010 and provided partial funding only for the costs of fuel abatement activities on forested Crown and local governments lands. Before changes to the program were enacted in 2011, fuel treatments were eligible for grants covering up to 75% of project costs.

The working group reviewed the original program with the goal of strengthening program transparency,

73 of 87

63

accountability and efficiency. The 2011 program revisions were based on this review and reflected the intent of the working group to create a sustainable fuel management program.

The new program increased funding levels to 90% of the cost of eligible activities up to $100,000 per applicant per calendar year, and 75% of costs thereafter. The remainder of project costs is required to be funded through community contributions.

Providing 100% funding for fuel abatement activities only on Crown land may have the unintended consequence of seeing wildfire risk reduction activities concentrated on Crown land, at the expense of those on local government lands.

See also resolution #8.

74 of 87

64

RESOLUTION #14

PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT & SCHOOL DISTRICT VILLAGE OF WARFIELD

WHEREAS schools in rural British Columbia are a vital economic development factor in small town BC and more partnerships should exist between community and education;

AND WHEREAS the local government would be a vital part of the decision in the event of a school closure, and have an opportunity to provide additional funding for the operation of the facility to maintain the facility open in their community, or when this is not practical, the community would be involved in the decision to close the facility and be aware of the ramifications in their community:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that partnerships should be entered into between communities and school districts for the. local government to provide building and grounds maintenance to education facilities within their jurisdiction.

AKBLG EXECUTWE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG E~ecutive does not recommend endorsement. This Resolution would open the door for downloading.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has endorsed previous resolutions that have sought the development of partnerships between local governments and boards of education (school districts). Specifically resolution 836 in 2003 requested that "the Ministry of Education and the BC School Trustees Association encourage school districts to enter into negotiations with the affected local governments to expand the role and use of rural sclwols to their full potential for the benefit of citizens and communities, thereby ensure the long-term viability of these essential assets."

As well members have endorsed other resolutions seeking to expand the role and use of rural scho.ols recognizing that they serve as community assets (1999-896). While these resolutions have focused on rural schools, many local governments across BC have undertaken to develop joint agreements with their boards of education related to maintenance of playing fields and school space as well as ensure these facilities and fields are used beyond the normal school day.

UBCM has a Protocol in place with the BC School Trustees Association (BCST A) that encourages enhanced boards of education/local government relations to provide for greater collaboration. It is up to each council/board to engage with their board of education as to what types of agreements they wish to establish. The Agreement specifically states:

75 of 87

65

RESOLUTION# 15

DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-ENERGY CAFFIENE DRINKS & IMPACT TO CHILDREN

CITY OF GRAND FORKS

WHEREAS today children of any age can purchase high-energy caffeine drinks over the counter at their local grocery or convenient store causing growing concern of the health impacts of these drinks on children;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities request that Health Canada restrict the sale of high caffeine energy drinks to children.

AKBLG EXECUTNE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive does not recommend endorsement.. This resolution does not come under local government jurisdiction.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has not previously considered a resolution requesting that the federal government restrict the sale of high-energy caffeine drinks to children.

76 of 87

66

RESOLUTION# 16 & #3

WILDLIFE CONFLICT CITY OF GRAND FORKS

WHEREAS there is no BC Wildlife Management Plan to deal with increasing wildlife conflict:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities request that the provincial government establish a Provincial Wildlife Management Plan under the Ministry of Environment and address the shortage of Conservation Officers that currently exists.

AKBLG EXECUTIVE COMMENTS:

The AKBLG Executive has requested that this resolution be merged with Resolution #3 Village of New Denver.

UBCM comments:

The UBCM membership has not previously considered a resolution requesting that the provincial government establish a Provincial Wildlife Management Plan. However, the membership has consistently endorsed resolutions that would support an increase in the number of conversation offzcers (2010-B25; 2003-B32; 1996-B27; 1996-B64; 1992-B35).

77 of 87

DATE

TOPIC

PROPOSAL

PROPOSED BY :

THE CITY OF ROSSLAND REQUEST FOR COUNCIL DECISION

April 2, 2012

City of Rossland Financial Plan 2012-2016 Bylaw #2527

Final Adoption of Bylaw #2527

Manager of Finance I Chief Financial Officer

SUMMARY: The Community Charter section 165 requires that a 5 Year Financial Plan be adopted by Council each year. Section 166 requires that Council undertake a public consultation prior to adopting the financial plan. The public process requirement has been met through the public consultation meeting on December 14th, 2011and the Open Committee of the Whole meetings held December 12th & 19th, 2011 and January 3n\ February 20th, February 27th and March 5th, 2012. A fmancial survey was also posted on the City's website and the public was asked to fill out the survey. The survey results were distributed to Council in January 2012. The 5 Year Financial Plan bylaw is now presented for fmal reading and adoption.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council give fmal reading and proceed to adoption of Bylaw 2527.

LEGISLATIVE IMPACTS, PRECEDENTS, POLICIES: The Community Charter sections 165 and 166 require that municipal Council's adopt their 5 Year Financial Plan after a public consultation process each year.

Manager of Finance

78 of 87

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

BYLAW #2527

A BYLAW TO ADOPT A FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 2012 TO 2016

WHEREAS section 165 of the Community Charter, SBC 2003 CHAP. 26 requires that Council adopt a financial plan for a period of five years,

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rossland, in open meeting assembled, hereby ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

SHORT TITLE

1. This Bylaw may be cited, for all purposes, as the "CITY OF ROSSLAND FINANCIAL PLAN 2012 -2016 BYLAW".

2. The planned revenues and expenditures for the years 2012 to 2016 shall be those recorded on Schedule "A" attached to, and forming part of this Bylaw.

3. In accordance with Section 165(3.1) of the Community Charter, Schedules "B", "C" and "D" are attached to, and form a part of this Bylaw to provide the objectives and policies regarding each of the following:

a) the proportion of total revenue that comes from each of the funding sources described in Section 165(7) of the Community Charter,

b) the distribution of property taxes among the property classes, and

c) the use of permissive tax exemptions

ENACTMENT

7. (1) If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Bylaw is for any reason held to be invalid by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalid portion shall be severed and the part that is invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder.

(2) Bylaw #2498 and the amendments thereto are hereby repealed.

(3) This Bylaw shall come into full force and effect on the final adoption thereof.

READ A FIRST TIME READ A SECOND TIME READ A THIRD TIME PUBLIC CONSULTATION HELD ON DECEMBER 14TH RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED

Mayor

this 26th day of March, 2012 this 26th day of March, 2012 this 26th day of March, 2012

this 1oth day of April, 2012

Corporate Officer

79 of 87

Bylaw #2527 Page2

BYLAW #2527

SCHEDULE "A"

City of Ross land 5 Year Financial Plan (Consolidated)

2012-2016

Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Re-.enue Taxation:

Property Value Taxes $ 3,439,700 $ 3,004,000 $ 3,435,800 $ 3,742,300 $ 3,815,500 Taxation for Debt 142,600 685,000 897,500 903,400 958,100 Proposed Taxation Increase - 525,000 187,000 - -Parcel & Local SeNice Area Taxes 554,000 554,000 554,000 554,000 554,000

4,136,300 4,768,000 5,074,300 5,199,700 5,327,600 Funding for Operations:

Utility Taxes & Grants in Lieu 92,300 101,300 101,400 101,500 101,600 Sales of SeNices 340,300 358,500 364,500 371,500 378,700 Licences, Permits, Fees & Other 131,700 133,800 135,900 138,100 140,400

' Utility User Fees 1,232,900 1,353,000 1,379,900 1,407,200 1,435,100 Tax Penalties & Interest 59,500 60,100 61,100 61,900 62,600

1,856,700 2,006,700 2,042,800 2,080,200 2,118,400 Transfer fi'om Own Funds/Reser-.es

. Funding for Operations 135,900 125,800 228,500 127,800 128,800 Grants - Operations 494,100 483,200 473,200 473,200 473,200

630,000 609,000 701,700 601,000 602,000

TOTAL REVENUES 6,623,000 7,383,700 7,818,800 7,880,900 8,048,000

Expenses (including Amortization) Go-.emment SeNices 1,051,900 1,064,900 1,094,200 1,093,700 1,109,700 Protecti-.e SeNices 144,300 147,200 150,200 153,200 156,400 General Operations 1,183,900 1,237,800 1,280,600 1,341,900 1,407,900

1water Operations 536,500 543,300 526,500 540,500 555,900 Sewer Operations 445,800 459,400 473,600 488,500 504,100 Environmental Health SeNices 117,900 134,900 137,100 139,600 142,300 Public Health and Welfare 13,000 5,000 5,100 5,200 5,300 Planning, Community & Environ. Dev. 260,200 223,400 226,700 230,100 233,500 Recreation and Cultural SeNices 174,000 176,800 179,500 182,300 185,100 Facilities and Parks 620,000 631,700 646,400 661,500 677,500 Special Projects 255,100 62,200 64,700 25,000 25,000 Community Support 452,400 268,300 269,600 267,100 266,900 Interest & Bank Charges 8,100 8,100 8,100 8,100 8,100 Interest on Long Term Debt 170,200 170,300 170,300 170,300 170,300 Amortization Expense 1,230,000 1,230,000 1,230,000 1,230,000 1,230,000

TOTAL EXPENSES 6,663,300 6,363,300 6,462,600 6,537,000 6,678,000

OPERATING SURPLUS (DEFICIT) (40,300) 1,020,400 1,356,200 1,343,900 1,370,000

Capital, Debt & Reser-.e Transfers: Funding for Capital Purposes:

Other Non-Operating Re-.enues 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Proposed Borrowing Proceeds 3,768,800 4,176,300 1,615,000 195,000 715,000 De-.elopment Cost Charges 68,900 - - 299,000 -

f Grants -Capital 2,831,800 1,982,400 1,382,400 182,400 312,400 Transfer fi'om Own Funds/Reser-.es

Funding for Capital Expenses 1,185,200 1,149,900 653,800 1,080,200 626,300

Capital Expenditures (8,265,000) (7,942,800) (4,142,800) (1 ,367,800) (1 ,349,900) Debt Principal Payments (238,200) (236,600) (185,200) (164,100) (144,100) Proposed Future Debt Payments - (677,000) (1 ,031 ,600) (1 ,058,600) (1,133,300) Transfers to Reser-.es

For Operating Purposes (58,100) (113,000) (14,500) (11 ,000) (14,500 For Capital Projects (488,100) (594,600) (868,300) (1 '734,000) (1,616,900

Portion of Amortization Expense not ftm 1,230,000 1,230,000 1,230,000 1,230,000 1,230,000

SURPLUS (DEFICIT) - - - - -NOTE: All proposed tax increases, borro!Mng proceeds and future debt payments require further authorization.

80 of 87

Bylaw #2527 Page3

BYLAW #2527

SCHEDULE "B"

Table 1- Proportions of Total Revenue From Funding Sources

%of Total Revenue Source Revenue Property Value Taxes $ 3,582,300 25% Utility Taxes & Grants in Lieu of Taxes 92,300 1% Parcel Taxes 554,000 4% Sales of Service 340,300 2% Utility User Fees 1,232,900 9% Licences, Permits, Fees & Other 196,200 1% De\elopment Cost Charges 68,900 0% Proposed Borrowing (not yet appro\A9d) 3,768,800 26% Grants 3,325,900 23% Transfers from Own Reser\es/Funds 1,321,100 9%

$ 14,482,700 100%

Table 1 shows the proportion of total revenue proposed to be raised from each funding source in 2012. Property Value Taxes form the greatest proportion of the revenue of the municipality and provide a stable, consistent source of revenue for many municipal services that are difficult or undesirable to fund on a user-pay basis. Grants also provide a major source of revenue to the municipality. The City has been fortunate to qualify for many different grant programs. Sales of service, licences and permits provide revenue for the municipality on a user-pay basis.

Policy:

Council is committed to maintaining a consistent property tax base and strives to maximize the user­pay method of providing services wherever feasible. The operations of the water and sewer utilities are self-funded through user fees.

Objectives:

• To maximize a user-pay cost structure wherever possible.

• To maximize the use of grant funding for infrastructure and service upgrades.

81 of 87

Bylaw #2527 Page4

BYLAW #2527

SCHEDULE "C"

Table 2 - Distribution of Property Taxes Among Property Classes

Table 2- Distribution of Property Taxes Among Property Classes

Property Class %of Property

Property Class Variable Value Tax Class 01 - Residential 1.00 $ 3,149,522 87.9% Class 02 - Utilities 5.63 96,421 2.7% Class 06 - Business I Other 1. 71 319,858 8.9% Class 07 - Managed Forest 3.00 1,335 0.0% Class 08 - Recreation I Non-Profit 1.00 15,086 0.4% Class 09 - Farm 1.00 78 0.0%

$ 3,582,300 100.0%

Table 2 shows the distribution of property value taxes among property classes. The City of Rossland's tax base is primarily residential and therefore the majority of the tax burden falls on the residential homeowners. The property class variable is determined as a multiple of the residential class variable.

Policy:

It is the policy of Council to maintain a tax rate ratio between individual property assessment classes at fixed values. The tax rate for all property classes are a multiple of the tax rate for Property Class 01 (Residential). In order to encourage business in Rossland and reduce operating costs for existing businesses, the tax rate multiple for Class 06 was reduced from 2.25 to 1.71 in 2007.

Objective:

To maintain the current tax rate structure and to encourage business in Rossland by providing tax relief in the form of the reduced variable tax rate.

82 of 87

Bylaw #2527

BYLAW #2498

SCHEDULE "D"

r- --------THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

PERMISSIVE TAX EXEMPTIONS

r I

Per Bylaw #2516- 2012 Permissive Tax Exemption Bylaw

Legal Description Roll# Civic Address Organization Roman Catholic Bishop of

Parcel A, Block 27, Plan 616A 767.350 2396 Columbia Avenue Nelson- Sacred Hearth Church Lots 11 - 14, Block 30, Plan Roman Catholic Bishop of 616A 805.100 2393 Columbia Avenue Nelson -Parish Hall

United Church of Canada -St. Lots 1 - 4, Block 20, Plan 616A 676.100 2110 -1st Avenue Andrew's United Church Lot 26, Block 18, Plan 616 & Lot Rossland Congregation of A, Plan 1 0762 673.940 2099 - 3rd Avenue Jehovah's Witnesses Lots 15 - 17, Block 26, Plan 579, Kootenay Land District 212.000 1869 Columbia Avenue Rossland Swimming Pool Society

2055- 2059 Washington Ross land Health Care Auxiliary Lot 15, Block 28, Plan 579 238.000 Street Society

Lot A, Plan 9862 675.000 2112 Second Avenue Golden City Manors Society Lot B, Plan 9766, District Lot 535 & Lot 22, Block 28, Plan 579 District Lot 535 exceppt Parcel A 243.000 2058 Spokane Street Rossland Child Care Society

Lot 20, Block 41, Plan 579 360.000 2054 Washington Street Ross land Light Opera Players Lot 1, Plan NEP73284, District Royal Canadian Legion (Class 8 Lot535 240.000 2081 Washington Street portion only)

Revitalization Tax Exemptions per Bylaw #2517 --------1----1

Lot 1 , Block 41, Plan 579 Quince Tree Enterprises Inc.

PageS

Council provides permissive tax exemption to not-for-profit organizations that form a valuable part of the community. These include religious institutions, recreational facilities, a seniors housing society and a child care society. In 2010, Council adopted a Revitalization Tax Exemption Bylaw to encourage economic activity and growth.

Policy:

Council will continue to support local not-for-profit organizations that provide benefits to the community as a whole and are eligible under the Community Charter through permissive tax exemptions. In order to encourage economic activity and growth, Council will provide revitalization tax exemption to businesses who meet the criteria set out in the Revitalization Tax program.

83 of 87

Bylaw #2527 Page6

Objective:

To provide permissive tax exemption to not-for-profit organizations that benefit the overall well-being of the community.

To encourage economic activity and growth by providing exemption from property value tax increases for a period of five years.

84 of 87

THE CITY OF ROSSLAND REQUEST FOR COUNCIL DECISION

DATE April4,2012

TOPIC City of Rossland Transportation Plan Bylaw

PROPOSAL First three readings of Bylaw No. 2528

PROPOSED BY : Corporate Officer =================================================================================

SUMMARY: Staff is recommending that Council consider adopting a Transportation Bylaw to increase success of grant applications concerning roads, sidewalks and trails within the Municipality. Proposed Bylaw No. 2528 - City ofRossland Transportation Plan Bylaw, defines the Major Transportation Network Plan via a map attached as "Schedule A" of the Bylaw.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Council gives the necessary three readings to Bylaw No. 2528.

OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES: Option 1: Readings of the proposed Transportation Plan Bylaw: This reflects Council's wish to adopt this Bylaw.

Option 2: Council does not give any readings to the proposed Transportation Plan Bylaw: Council has the option not to proceed with a Transportation Plan Bylaw.

Option 3: Council amends the proposed Transportation Plan Bylaw. The process of amendment is undertaken and the bylaw will be brought back to Council at the next regular meeting.

BENEFITS DISADVANTAGES AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Option 1: The key benefit is that the bylaw will be established and can be attached to grant applications concerning roads, sidewalks and trails, hopefully increasing the City's success rate.

Option 2: Council may not wish to move forward with the proposed bylaw. Staff would continue to apply for grants but would not have the added advantage of including a Transportation Plan Bylaw.

Option 3: Council may be in favour of moving the Transportation Plan Bylaw forward but with amendments. This should be done in a timely fashion in order to have the bylaw adopted for the next round of grant applications closing at the end of May 2012.

COSTS AND BUDGET IMPACT · REVENUE GENERATION: There are no costs or budget impact by adopting this Bylaw.

LEGISLATIVE IMPACTS, PRECEDENTS, POLICIES: ~ The Community Charter provides the City the general authority in relation to highways.

Jb .u;ivJ - ,-; ~rtment Head Reviewed by Ci4-M'an~ Corporate Officer or City Manager ---------1r-

~

85 of 87

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND

BYLAW#2528 A BYLAW TO ESTABLISH THE TRANSPORTATION ROUTE'S WITIDN THE BOUNDARIES

OF THE MUNICIPALITY

WHEREAS pursuant to the Community Charter, Council of the City of Rossland, has general authority in relation to highways;

AND WHEREAS the City of Rossland Official Community Plan encourages transportation systems that are more fuel efficient and/or utilize renewable energy sources which have minimal impact on air quality wherever possible;

AND WHEREAS the City of Rossland has adopted the "Active Transportation Plan" providing recommendations for improving conditions for walking, cycling and other active modes of transportation within the City;

AND WHEREAS the City of Rossland wishes to adopt a Major Transportation Network Plan within the City;

NOW THEREFORE the Council of the City of Rossland, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. (1)

2. (1)

3. (1)

SHORT TITLE

This Bylaw may be cited as the "CITY OF ROSSLAND TRANSPORTATION PLAN

BYLAW No. 2528, 2012"

APPLICATION

Schedule "A" Major Transportation Network Plan - attached to and forming part of this Bylaw, defines the Major Transportation Plan for the City of Rossland.

ENACTMENT

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Bylaw is for any reason held to be invalid by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalid portion shall be severed and the part that is invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder.

86 of 87

(2) This Bylaw shall come into full force and effect upon the adoption thereof.

READ A FIRST TIME READ A SECOND TIME READ A THIRD TIME RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED

Mayor

this lOth day of April, 2012 this 101

h day of April, 2012 this lOth day of April, 2012

this day of, 2012

Corporate Officer

87 of 87

£i Schedule A- Major Transportation Network Plan