the crisis of branding and the theory needed to solve it · the crisis of branding and the theory...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2002 IBM Corporation
IBM Global Services
The Crisis of Branding and the Theory Needed to Solve It
Paul K. MagillSeptember 2003
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation2
A key focus for Services Research and Marketing should be evolving management practice for the on demand era
Required Approaches
“Social”Approaches“Social”Approaches
“Engineering”Approaches“Engineering”Approaches
Elements to be managed in on demand enterprise
Brand Capital / market influence
Human Capital / organizational behavior
Working Capital / operating expense
Physical Capital / capital investment
Management Practice Today
Management Practice Today
Opportunity for IBM differentiation by “mainstreaming”emerging management practice
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation3
A Point of View
Management practice today is rooted in an “Engineering” paradigm while the main drivers of profitability increasingly require “Social” approaches
Brand Capital, Intellectual Capital, Human Capital are increasing in importance while the techniques to manage them remain underdeveloped
Managing Brand is a special case of a general need to manage player behavior in ecosystems
Look at Branding practices over time as a guide to the type of theory required for managing player behavior in ecosystems in the future
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation5
1900 – 1920: Era of ClaimsBranding was used to…
Establish names and labels
Provide instruction on product use
Convey the strength, stability & prestige of manufacturer
And…Make outrageous “snake oil” claims
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation6
1920 – 1960: Era of AssociationsBranding exploited emotional and psychological associations
Drive associations of product with high status and the aspirationallifestyleUse behavioral psychology to pull consumers to brandsLeverage rising income, suburbanization and televisionInstruct Americans on how to live, what to value
Branding practices had become public knowledgeJournalists, authors, filmmakers and academics described the manipulative aspects of brandingConsumers started to actively resist cultural engineering by marketers
But by the 1950s and 60s…
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation7
1960 – 1999: Era of AuthenticityMarketers struggle to find a new branding paradigm…
Cultural revolution of the 60s
Marketing – engineered prescriptions become less compelling
Resistance to cultural engineering of marketers becomes the means through which consumers express themselves
Marketers who can engage the new consumer sentiment win big
Brands become cultural resources for consumers to express their own identity
Value of “authenticity” skyrockets
But… the market remains the primary arena for expression
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation8
Branding Practice c.1999
Adopt the opposite of the authoritative voice of the 1920s-60s –poke fun at traditional advertising, use ironic voice, distance brands from overt persuasion
Connect brands to aspirational and authentic communities
Establish real-world authenticity and / or historical authenticity
Create brand allegiance among the influential elite – guerrilla and viral marketing
Cool hunting
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation9
The Developing Branding Crisis:Tensions in the current branding paradigm
Authentic becomes cliche and scarce
Influential elite lose influence as they sell out
Brand puppetmasters revealed
Intermediaries manage clutter but create new cultural authorities
Ad agencies and branding firms cloak the true corporation
Denial that the brand is motivated by a search for profits losescredibility
Conflict emerges between the brand value proposition to the consumer and the corporation’s treatment of non-consumers
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation10
Today: A Crisis of Branding
No Logo
Second Superpower
Most valuable brands are becoming most the hated brands
No actionable theory for addressing the crisis or profiting from its resolution
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation11
Marketing Theory Today
QuantitativeSales-Support Marketing
QuantitativeSales-Support Marketing
“The quant jocks will move from Wall Street to Madison Avenue”
- Hal Varian
“The quant jocks will move from Wall Street to Madison Avenue”
- Hal Varian
Holistic BrandingHolistic Branding
Brand intent, strategy
All customer touchpointscoordinated
External / internal alignment
CEO as brand steward
Semiotics and critical social theory are niches at best
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation12
Marketing / Branding Theory Required
Quantitative sales-support Marketing
Holistic Branding
Detection and diagnosis of emergent consumer cynicism
Projection of potential equilibrium arrangements between branding paradigm and consumer culture
Framework for innovation and creative experimentation
Strategies for intervening in networked markets
What we needWhat we have
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation13
Definition of an Advancement in Branding Practice
An advancement is a transition to a new equilibrium between the branding paradigm and consumer culture. It is fostered by crisis and resolved through innovation. It results in market rejuvenation.
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation14
2000 – 2020: The Era of Subservience?
Corporations will need to cede more of their cultural power to consumers
Consumers will express themselves not only through selective embrace of brands but also through changing the corporations behind the brands
Brands which exhibit corporate responsiveness and flexibility will gain a dynamic resilience
A new equilibrium will emerge in which responsive brands co-exist profitably with citizen-activist consumers – who still buy
Eventually the limits of corporate responsiveness will become clear and a new crisis will develop
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation15
The Social Theory of Branding
Firm behavior in pursuit of profitsFirm behavior in pursuit of profits
Crisis
Mediated through the market
Crisis Crisis
Individual behavior in pursuit of sovereigntyIndividual behavior in pursuit of sovereignty
Crisis of Branding – Paul Magill
© 2003 IBM Corporation16
Implications
We need to recognize that the on demand business not only exhibits increasing automation and information-intensity in its business processes, it also proliferates its relationships and networks
Firms in the on demand era are seeking to engage the beliefs and behaviors of others – consumers, employees, ecosystem participants. Traditional management practice provides very little guidance on how to do this
We need ways to sense emerging crises, project future equilibrium states, innovate and experiment with new influence approaches, and intervene to stabilize or disrupt emerging patterns
We should be drawing from social theory to pursue management tools and techniques for helping firms make informed choices about their behavior in multi-player networks