the developing person
DESCRIPTION
The Developing Person. … he allowed himself to be swayed by his conviction that human beings are not born once and for all on the day their mothers give birth to them, but that life obliges them over and over again to give birth to themselves. Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Developmental Psychology. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Developing Person
… he allowed himself to be swayed by his conviction that human beings are not born once and for all on the day their mothers give birth to them, but that life obliges them over and over again to give birth to themselves.
Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Developmental Psychology
Studies physical, cognitive & psychosocial changes across the life span
Two methods of conducting research– Longitudinal research
Study the same participants over a long
period of timeProblems: expensive and possible drop-outs
– Cross-sectional researchGroups of Ps, of different ages, studied at same timeProblem: cohort peculiarities
Physical Development - Prenatal
Zygote stage: conception to week 2– Moves to embryonic stage when multicell ball attaches
to uterine wall Embryonic stage: end of wk 2 to wk 8
– Genes are in the background directing progress– Boys become boys when testosterone is secreted,
producing male sex organs Fetal stage: end of wk 8 to birth
– Movement felt by mom by 4th month– By 7th most everything is developed
Focus is on growth!
Physical Development
Premature birth– Smaller in weight, though not always in length– Less physically & cognitively developed, hearing
problems common– Usually up to 2 months early still has a fighting chance
Teratogens– Noxious substance or factors that can disrupt prenatal
development– X-rays: disrupt development of brain cells– Drugs: abnormal physical & psychological
development– Alcohol: FAS; mental retardation, facial disfigurement
Physical Development
Infancy: birth to 2 yrs– Babies are born to survive
Rooting reflex Cry when hungry, smile to reinforce closeness of caregiver Quickly learn to recognize mother’s smell, voice, and face
– Perception Newborns can’t focus on distant objects Visual cliff (see page 167 in book)
– Depth perception develops between 4th & 6th month
– Motor development Cephalocaudal trend (head to foot growth and motor control) Proximodistal trend (center out growth and motor control)
History of Developmental Ψ
Medieval Times (500 – 1500 AD)– Preformationism: Children were viewed as miniature adults
Reformation (1500’s)– Puritanism: Children are born evil and stubborn
Enlightenment (1600’s and 1700’s)– John Locke – tabula rasa– Rousseau – children are noble savages
Darwin (1800’s)– Ontogeny & Phylogeny, and Baby Biographies
Logs of infant development Focus on maturation & development
History of Developmental Ψ
1890s– G. Stanley Hall
Founder of child psychology Focus on heredity
1920s– Remember behaviorism?
1950s– First look at other ages in the lifespan (Erikson & Piaget)
1960s– Behavioral genetics
How heredity & life experience interact in affecting development Ex: divorce, empathy, attachment styles
Piaget
A proponent of the belief that intelligence develops qualitatively with age, as well as quantitatively
Genetic Epistemology– Intellect develops in gradual
stages, much as the body does Hence the term ‘genetic’ does not
refer to our genes’ influence on our intelligence but rather as a reference to development
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Dev.
Themes of cognitive development– Schemas– Assimilation– Accommodation
Sensorimotor – Birth to 2 years– Learn to coordinate sensory experience & motor
behavior– Object constancy (a.k.a. object permanence)
Object Permanence
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Dev.
Preoperational– Age: 2 to 7 years– Language more sophisticated but still have trouble
with mental manipulation of information– Can’t engage in certain mental operations
Conservation Reversible mental representations
– Egocentrism
Conservation
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Dev.
Concrete Operational – Age: 7 to 11 years– Child learns to logically reason about objects– Understands
Conservation (can make transitive inferences)
Formal Operational – Adolescent reasons in more abstract,
idealistic and logical ways
Water task
A B
Figure A shows a bottle with some water in it.
In B, the bottle has been tilted.
Draw a line to show how the water line would look.
Moral Development - Piaget
Focused on moral understanding, rather than moral behavior
Three stages of moral development– Moral Realism (0 to 7 yrs)– Morality of Cooperation (7 to 11 yrs)– Moral Relativism (12 yrs & up)
Moral Development - Kohlberg
Preconventional– Punishment and obedience orientation– Individualism and purpose
Conventional– Good boy - Nice girl orientation– Society - maintaining orientation
Post-conventional– Community rights vs. personal rights– Universal ethical principle orientation
A. I find it relatively easy to get close to others and am comfortable depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t often worry about being abandoned or about someone getting too close to me.
B. I am somewhat uncomfortable being close to others. I find it difficult to trust them completely, difficult to allow myself to depend on them. I am nervous when anyone gets too close, and often, love partners want me to be more intimate than I feel comfortable being.
C. I find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I often worry that my partner doesn’t really love me or want to stay with me. I want to merge completely with another person, and this desire sometimes scares people away.
Attachment Theory
Harlow’s monkeys– Wire mesh vs. cloth mothers
Bowlby– Orphans in London– Attachment
An emotional bond to one’s caregiver as an infant
Three components of attachment– Proximity maintenance– Safe haven– Secure base
Attachment Theory Research
Ainsworth– Strange Situation– Examines reaction of child to three situations
Exploration Mom leaves Mom returns
Attachment styles– Based on history with caregiver, we develop a
tendency to relate to others in a certain manner– Can I count on my attachment figure to be available
and responsive when I need them?
Three Primary Attachment ‘Styles’
Secure– Yes: Infants feel comfortable to explore, trust a responsive
mother– Adults find it easy to trust, want love, don’t fear rejection, see
themselves as worthy of affection Avoidant
– No: Infants appear detached from unresponsive or rejecting mother
– Adults are aloof, emotionally distant, skeptical of others’ love, fear rejection but still want closeness
Anxious-ambivalent– Maybe: Infants cling to inconsistent caregiver and protest
extremely when needs aren’t met– Adults see themselves as misunderstood, lacking in confidence,
can be clingy or needy in a relationship
A. I find it relatively easy to get close to others and am comfortable depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t often worry about being abandoned or about someone getting too close to me.
B. I am somewhat uncomfortable being close to others. I find it difficult to trust them completely, difficult to allow myself to depend on them. I am nervous when anyone gets too close, and often, love partners want me to be more intimate than I feel comfortable being.
C. I find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I often worry that my partner doesn’t really love me or want to stay with me. I want to merge completely with another person, and this desire sometimes scares people away.
Attachment Styles
Attachment styles can change over time– Either through self-motivated growth/deterioration or
because of secure/insecure relationship partners Pairing up
– Most secures bond with other secures– Most avoidants bond with secures (a few with anxious-
ambivalent, rarely with other avoidants)– Most anxious-ambivalents bond with secures, a few
with avoidants (rarely with other anxious-ambivalents)
Erikson’s Stages of Development
Trust vs. mistrust– Birth to 1 year– Treatment by caregivers creates trust in a good world
Autonomy vs. shame and doubt– 1 to 2 years– Child is allowed to make independent decisions or is
made to feel ashamed/full of doubt about own decisions
Initiative vs. guilt– 3 to 6 years– Child either develops own purpose/direction or is
made to feel guilty by overly controlling caregivers
Erikson’s Stages of Development
Industry vs. inferiority– 6 to 11 years– Child either feels competent working with others or
inferior Identity vs. role confusion
– Adolescence– Adolescent either grasps sense of identity or becomes
confused about possible future roles as adult Intimacy vs. isolation
– Young adulthood (ages 20 to 40)– Forming deep/intimate relationships with others or
becoming socially isolated
Erikson’s Stages of Development
Generativity vs. self-absorption/stagnation– Middle adulthood (ages 40 to 65)– Determining what to leave behind for future
generations or failing to grasp a sense of
meaning in life Integrity vs. despair
– Late adulthood (ages 65 and up)– Feeling that life was worthwhile or feeling despair
about one’s life and fearing death