the diffuse supernova neutrino background louie strigari the ohio state university collaborators:...
TRANSCRIPT
The Diffuse Supernova
Neutrino Background
Louie Strigari The Ohio State
UniversityCollaborators: John Beacom, Manoj Kaplinghat, Gary Steigman, Terry Walker, Pengjie Zhang
The PlanThe Plan
Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Diffuse Supernova Neutrino BackgroundBackground Theoretical PredictionTheoretical Prediction Experimental Limits and Detection Experimental Limits and Detection
ProspectsProspects Sampling Flavors of the DSNBSampling Flavors of the DSNB MeV Neutrino and Gamma-Ray MeV Neutrino and Gamma-Ray
AstronomyAstronomy Return to the Crime Scene: SN 1987AReturn to the Crime Scene: SN 1987A
DSNB: The Big PictureDSNB: The Big Picture
Core Collapse of Massive Star Core Collapse of Massive Star Gives Burst of Gives Burst of
~ 10~ 105858 Neutrinos Neutrinos
Massive Star Formation Since z Massive Star Formation Since z ≤ 6≤ 6
==
++
The Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background (DSNB) – Cosmological background of neutrinos from all supernovae that have occurred
Evolution of Massive Stars Evolution of Massive Stars (> 8 Solar Mass) (> 8 Solar Mass)
Main Sequence Main Sequence Burning: 10-Burning: 10-
100 Myr100 Myr
Core Collapse: Core Collapse: 3 x 10 3 x 105353
ergs released in ergs released in ~10 seconds~10 seconds
Optical Optical SNIISNII
oror
Black Black HoleHole
Main Sequence, Binaryt ~ Gyr
Accreting White Dwarft ~
Gyr
SNIa (+Fe)
Evolution of Intermediate Evolution of Intermediate Mass Stars (3-8 Mass Stars (3-8
Solar Mass)Solar Mass)
Cosmic Star Formation Cosmic Star Formation RateRate
D. Schiminovich et al. (2005)
• UV luminosity density β ~ 2.5
• Galaxy Surveys β ~ 2-4 SDSS, 2df
zp ~ 1
α ~ 0-2
supernova rate = [stellar mass function] x [star formation rate]
DSNB Flux Theoretical DSNB Flux Theoretical PredictionsPredictions
Increase in High Redshift Star Formation
Best Estimate ModelLower bound from Astronomy Data
Supernova Neutrino Spectrum
Impact of Oscillations:Dighe & Smirnov 2003, Minakata et al. 2002
DSNB DetectionDSNB Detection
Event Rate = [ # of targets ] x [ cross section ] x [ flux ]
Largest Yield from Inverse Beta
1.5 x 1033
Visible
Invisible
Super-Kamiokande (22.5 kton)
Backgrounds to Backgrounds to DetectionDetection
Below ~ 50 MeV, Muon is InvisibleBelow ~ 50 MeV, Muon is Invisible
AtmosphereAtmosphere
DSNB Event Rate DSNB Event Rate PredictionsPredictions
• Modern predictions for Super-K: ~ 3 events/yr above 18 MeV ~ 6 events/yr above 10 MeV
Ando, Sato & Totani 2003
Fukugita & Kawasaki 2003
Strigari, Kaplinghat, Steigman & Walker 2004
• Atmospheric Background ReductionBeacom & Vagins 2004
Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, PRL 90, 061101 (2003)
Super-K Upper LimitSuper-K Upper Limit
• 4+ years of data gives flux limit: 1.2 cm-2 s-1
• Detection signature is an excess of events
• Detection timescale with fiducial model is ≈ 9 yearsStrigari, Kaplinghat, Steigman, Walker 2004
Gadolinium Enhanced Gadolinium Enhanced Super-K (GADZOOKS!)Super-K (GADZOOKS!)
• Neutron TaggingNeutron Tagging
• Reduction of Invisible Muon Reduction of Invisible Muon BackgroundBackground
• Lower Energy Threshold for Lower Energy Threshold for DSNB Detection DSNB Detection
Flu
xF
lux
Threshold Threshold EnergyEnergyStrigari, Kaplinghat, Steigman,
Walker 2004
The Idea:Addition of Gadolinium Trichloride
to Water Cerenkov Detectors
The Benefits:
DSNB ScorecardDSNB Scorecard
DetectorDetector ChannChannelel
Energy Energy WindowWindow††
Flux Flux LimitLimit‡‡
Super-KSuper-K 19 - 8319 - 83 1.21.2
KamLANDKamLAND 8 - 14 8 - 14 ~10~1022
Mont Mont BlancBlanc
25 - 50 25 - 50 ~10~1044
SNOSNO## 21 - 3121 - 31 ~10~10† † Neutrino Energies in MeVNeutrino Energies in MeV
‡ ‡ Fluxes in cmFluxes in cm-2-2 s s-1-1
## Beacom & Strigari (in prep.) Beacom & Strigari (in prep.)
## Predicted Liquid Argon flux limit: 1.6 cm Predicted Liquid Argon flux limit: 1.6 cm-2-2 s s-1-1 (Cocco, Ereditato, Fiorillo, (Cocco, Ereditato, Fiorillo, Mangano, Pettorino 2004) Mangano, Pettorino 2004)
DSNB Detection ChannelsDSNB Detection Channels
Super-K (H20)
SNO (D2O)
DSNB Constrains from DSNB Constrains from SNOSNO
Beacom & Strigari (in prep)
• Solar background < 20 MeV
• Invisible Muon Background
• DSNB Electron Neutrino Flux Limit at SNO
MeV Neutrino and MeV Neutrino and Gamma-Ray Astronomy Gamma-Ray Astronomy
• Shaded Region- SDSS, 2dF
• Curves- models based on UV, IR luminsity
• DSNB is the strongest constraint on the massive Star Formation Rate Fukugita & Kawasaki 2003Ando 2004
Concordance Region
Strigari, Beacom, Walker, Zhang, JCAP04(2005)017
Constraining the Cosmic Constraining the Cosmic Star Formation RateStar Formation Rate
• Test supernova progenitor models
• What fraction of core-collapse SNII fail?
• What is the average delay time between the formation of a binary star system and a SNIa event?
Cosmic Supernova RatesCosmic Supernova Rates
Strigari, Beacom, Walker, Zhang, JCAP04(2005)017
• CGB Sources
< 1 MeV: Seyferts
> 10 MeV: Blazars
1-3 MeV: SNIa
• Concordance model constrains SNIa contribution to the CGB
• What are the sources of the 1-3 MeV CGB?
Cosmic Gamma-Ray BackgroundCosmic Gamma-Ray Background(CGB)(CGB)
Strigari, Beacom, Walker, Zhang, JCAP04(2005)017
Additional Physics with the Additional Physics with the DSNBDSNB
Constraints on Neutrino PropertiesConstraints on Neutrino Properties Neutrino Decay Neutrino Decay
Ando 2003 Ando 2003 Fogli, Lisi, Mirizzi, Montanino Fogli, Lisi, Mirizzi, Montanino 20042004
Mini Z Burst Mini Z Burst Goldberg, Perez, Sarcevic 2005Goldberg, Perez, Sarcevic 2005
Supernova Neutrinos from Supernova Neutrinos from Nearby Galaxies? Nearby Galaxies?
Ando, Beacom, and Yuksel 2005
• Detection potential with megaton detectors
• Correlate with optical SNII for the detection of 1 event
• 2 event detection essentially background free
Return to the Crime Scene: Return to the Crime Scene: Supernova 1987ASupernova 1987A
Historical SupernovaeHistorical Supernovae
Supernova Rate in the Milky Way ≈ 1 per centurySupernova Rate in the Milky Way ≈ 1 per century
One identified nearby supernova in telescopic era: One identified nearby supernova in telescopic era: SN 1987ASN 1987A
Stephenson and Green Stephenson and Green (2002)(2002)
“You can observe a lot just by watching’ –Yogi Berra
A Blast from the Past:A Blast from the Past:Supernova 1987ASupernova 1987A
• 19 neutrinos detected by IMB and Kamiokande
• Consistent with core collapse energy budget
• What was the flavor content of the flux?
• Why were a majority of the events forward?
Constraining Flavor Constraining Flavor EmissionEmission
• DSNB flux limit at DSNB flux limit at SNO can constrain SNO can constrain electron neutrino flux electron neutrino flux from SN 1987Afrom SN 1987A
• Was the electron Was the electron neutrino flux larger than neutrino flux larger than expected? expected? e.g. e.g. Costantini, Ianni, Vissani 2004 Costantini, Ianni, Vissani 2004
• SNO limit more sensitive SNO limit more sensitive to higher electron neutrino to higher electron neutrino temperaturestemperatures
Beacom & Strigari (in prep)
ConclusionsConclusions
DSNB: First Detection of Neutrinos Beyond SN1987A?
Current DSNB Limits Constrain the Cosmic Star Formation Rate (CSFR)
Measurements of the CSFR in Agreement with Supernova Rates
DSNB + SN1987A can constrain supernova neutrino emission