the disciplinary roots of conflict intervention how should theory shape our practice?
DESCRIPTION
Principle #1 Effects Decreases the likelihood faulty, harmful, or misleading intervention practice. Supports the development of systematic and replicable intervention practice.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention
How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?
![Page 2: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Principle # 1
Conflict intervention can and should be rooted in existing theory and research.
![Page 3: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Principle #1 Effects
Decreases the likelihood faulty, harmful, or misleading intervention practice.
Supports the development of systematic and replicable intervention practice.
![Page 4: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Principle #2
Conflict theory and research is inherently inter-disciplinary.
![Page 5: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Principle #2 Effects
Discourages a myopic view of conflict theory and research that restricts practitioners’ intervention options
![Page 6: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Theoretical PerspectivesThe Biological
Perspective
The Psychodynamic Perspective
The Social Psychological Perspective
The Interpretive Perspective
The Interactional Perspective
The Structural Perspective
The Critical Perspective
![Page 7: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Principle #3 Specific insights from theory and research offer options for intervention but do not dictate practitioner choices.
![Page 8: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Principle # 3: Effects Deters practitioners from mistaking a
theoretical understanding for a directive about what must be done in intervention practice.
Encourages scholars to acknowledge the values they enact when they move from a research insight to a recommendation for intervention practice.
![Page 9: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Principle #4
Ideological commitments shape practitioners’ decisions about how theory/research is used in conflict intervention.
![Page 10: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Principle#4: EffectsDiscourages Ideological Promiscuity
Espouse party-driven (bottom-up) commitments but enact intervener-driven (top-down) intervention practices
Fail to acknowledge that all intervention skills are
linked to ideological purpose
Abandon the valued uniqueness of intervention practices
![Page 11: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ideological Beliefs and Conflict Intervention Practice
Assumptions about Human Nature
Assumptions about the Nature of Conflict
Assumptions about What Productive Conflict Is
Assumptions about the Role of Social Institutions in Conflict Intervention
![Page 12: The Disciplinary Roots of Conflict Intervention How Should Theory Shape Our Practice?](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083120/5a4d1b477f8b9ab0599a3cff/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Holding the Conflict Field Accountable
√ Linking Theory to Practice
√ Understanding the inter-disciplinary nature of the field
√ Clarifying ideological commitments that shape the way theory and research are invoked in practice
√ Avoiding ideological promiscuity