the dp2
TRANSCRIPT
The DP
Strange similarities
NP• LEXICAL PROJECTION
• Binding domain• Bounding node• NPs in spec are subject-
like
IP• FUNCTIONAL PROJECTION
• Binding domain• Bounding node• NPs in spec are subjects
Universal categories
• If nouns and verbs are the only truly universal word classes they should behave similarly
• We have proposed IP or a series of functional projections of VP
• We have proposed movement V->I->C • Shouldn’t there be functional projections above
NP, or the possibility of N movement?
The DP hypothesis
• Student work
• Proposed that Determiners were more important than simply specifier elements
• DP is a functional projection above NP
• Follows x bar theory• Gives NP functional
architecture
Tok Pisin Pronouns
• Functional projections above NP and below DP
• Each projection has a morpheme as its head.
• The moving element from NP, the pronoun yu moves up and collects the morphology
• Moves to D because pronouns are definite
Word order variation
• Remember– Marie fume souvent des cigarettes.– Mary often smokes cigarettes.
• French and English word order with respect to V and Adv accounted for by V->I movement in French
• Verb movement provoked by a strong [+V] feature• Different word order in the DP/NP about
movement and a D feature?
English versus French
French N movement English N in situ