the effect of imperfections cylindrical shells thesis … · buckling of thin walled cylindrical...
TRANSCRIPT
THE EFFECT OF IMPERFECTIONS
ON THE
BUCKLING OF THIN WALLED
CYLINDRICAL SHELLS
Thesis by
Robert L. Ditchey
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of
Aeronautical Engineer
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California
1973
(Submitted May 25, 1973)
-ii-
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author feels very sincerely that this work is but an
incremental step in comparison to the accomplishments of many
engin~ers and theoreticians who have studied this topic. The
intellect and the dedication of so many inspires both awe and
humility.
The author is deeply indebted to Dr. C. D. Babcock, Jr. for
his guidance, patience, and encouragement during the course of
this work, and to Dr. J. Arbocz for his generous assistance and
understanding. In particular, a great debt is owed to Dr. E. E.
Sechler, without whose assistance none of this would have been
possible.
Gratitude is due to Elizabeth Fox for her great skill and
the patience shown in typing this thesis, and to Betty Wood for
preparing the figures.
Finally, a very special word of gratitude is expressed
to the author's wife and children for their encouragement, patience,
and the many sunny weekends spent at horne.
-iii-
ABSTRACT
A theoretical study of the effect of imperfections on the buck
ling load of a circular cylindrical shell under axial compression was
carried out.
The nonlinear shell equations of Donnell are solved in an
approximate manner using the Potential Energy Theorem. The
method of derivation and the resulting algebraic equations are com
pared to previous derivations which use a different method of solu
tion. It was found that the resulting equations are identical to the
ones derived by Galerkin's procedure, lending credence to that method.
A parametric study of an imperfection model was carried
out numerically. The imperfection model is similar to that origi
nally used by Donnell, having amplitude decay with increasing wave
number. The results show the effect of various rates of decay of
amplitude with wave number, as well as the effect of various
assumed amplitudes. Using these parameters, it is shown when
shell buckling is dominated by long wave imperfections as opposed
to classical short wc:.ve imperfections.
It was found that if the decay of asymmetric imperfections
with axial wave number is sufficiently high, that long wave imper
fections can dominate. In the range of values chosen for these
parameters, changes in the axisymmetric imperfection model had
little effect on buckling behavior as compared to the changes in
sensitivity to long waves which occur as the asymmetric model
is varied.
A}, A 2 , A 3 , etc.
B}, B 2 , B 3 , etc.
a}, a 2 , a 3 , etc.
bI
, b2
, b3
, etc.
c
E
G}, G2
i, k
I.
L
Ml
, M 2 , M3
,
M 6, M9
, M9
N l ,NS,N 6,NS'
N9
Nx ' Ny' Nxy
p}' P 3' P 4
q
r
R
s
t
u
U 1,U2,U3
-iv-
LIST OF SYMBOLS
coefficients given on page 29
coefficients given on page 29
coefficients given on page 30
coefficients given on page 30
= -V3(1-V2
)
Young's modulus
operators defined on pages Sand 6
axial half wave numbers
circumferential wave numbers
length of shell
coefficients of N y
coefficients of N x
Stress Resultants, defined on page S
coefficients of N xy
decay constant operating on i
decay constant operating on k
shell radius
decay constant operating on I.
shell thickness
Potential Energy
integrals representing contributions to the total
potential energy
u,v
w
w
x,y
XA,X
o.i , o.k , o.i+k' o.i _k ,
{3, 'Yk , Yk , 'Yi+k'
'Yi_k
€x' €y' 'Y xy
v
A
a
s· 1
~. 1
-v-
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Cont'd)
displacements
radial displacement, po sitive outward
radial imperfection (displacement) from perfect
circular cylinder
axial and circumferential coordinates on the
middle surface of the shell, respectively
axisymmetric and asytnmetric imperfection
amplitude used in the imperfection models,
respectively
mode shape parameters defined on page 34
strain, defined on page 8
Poisson's Ratio
nondimensional loading parameter
axial stress
Rca =-:Et
nondimensional radial displacement amplitude
nondimensional initial imperfection amplitude
-viii-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part Page
I GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1
II THEORETICAL FORMULATION 4
l. Donnell Shell Equations 4
2. Mode Selection 5
3. Boundary Conditions 7
4. Stress Resultants 8
5. Potential Energy 11
III NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 15
1. Imperfection Model 15
2. Shell Geometry and Material Properties 16
3. Wave Numbers and Mode Shape Parameters 16
4. Numerical Procedure 17
IV DISCUSSION OF NUMERICAL RESULTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS 20
1. The Effect of Varying the Axisymmetric
Model Parameters (X A and q) 20
2. The Asymmetric Model - The Effect of
Varying X 22
3. The Asymmetric Model - The Effect of
Varying s 22
4. The Asymmetric Model - The Effect of
Varying r 24
5. Items Which Induce Short Wave Imperfection
Sensitivity 24
-I-
I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION
The buckling load of isotropic thin-walled cylindrical shells
under axial compression cannot be accurately predicted by linearized
small deflection theory. Clas sical theory of this general category
predicts a collapse load which is never reached in experiznental work.
Moreover, the results of numerous experiments indicate that a very
complex phenomenon must be involved.
The general problem of cylinders in axial compression has
been investigated and discussed by a very great number of authors.
The reader is referred to Fung and Sechler (Ref. 1) for a detailed
discussion and a listing of some of the many writings on this topic.
For a discussion of the role of imperfections in shell buckling, the
reader is referred to Arbocz and Babcock (Ref. 2).
The work presented herein represents an amplification of
the theory presented by Arbocz and Babcock. In that paper the im
perfect shell equations are solved in an approximate manner using
a two mode deflection assumption and a Galerkin approach. The
resulting algebraic equations are simplified by neglecting cubic
term.s in com.parison to the quadratic terms (Ref. 3). The circum
ferential periodicity condition (Ref. 4) is not considered in the
fo rmulation.
A study of the influence of these assumptions on the result
ing algebraic equations is one objective of this work. Figure 1 is
a graphical display of the rationale involved.
Starting with the as sumptions made in the derivation of the
nonlinear shell equations of Donnell (Ref. 5) one may choose to use
-2-
a Galerkin type of approxim.ation procedure, or to follow a potential
energy m.ethod of form.ulation. Having chosen either of these paths,
two branches then exist for each - whether to seek a particular solu
tion to the com.patibility equation (a stress function form.ulation) or to
seek a particular solution to the inplane equilibriUITI. equations (a dis
placem.ent form.ulation). Variations in m.ethod then follow depending
upon the specific way by which periodicity of the circum.ferential
displacem.ent is satisfied. Considering just the Galerkin procedure,
different m.ethods can be obtained depending upon variations in the
weight~g function. Considering the m.ethod of solving the inplane
equilibrium. equations, different m.ethods m.ay be obtained depending
upon whether or not one allows for a constant term. in the radial
displacem.ent. This term. would perm.it a uniform. expansion.
The Galerkin procedure used by Arbocz and Babcock (and
others) left open the m.athem.atical validity of the specific weighting
function to be used - an essential and all-im.portant factor in the
analysis. Since it was recognized that the Galerkin procedure was
approxim.ate, it was desirable to derive a solution to the Donnell
equations using a potential energy m.ethod and com.pare the results.
It should also be understood that an essential factor which
will introduce variations in all m.ethods is the m.athem.atic m.odel for
radial displacem.ent and the im.perfections (m.odal decom.position).
For exam.ple, the m.ethod followed herein is a two m.ode representa
tion using cosine axial representation for a general axisyrnm.etric
term. and sine axial representation for a general asym.m.etric term..
One could, of course, introduce com.plexity by using m.ore than two
-3-
modes .and one could use a different trigonometric representation.
It is clear from earlier work that a two mode solution does lead to
numerical inaccuracy, as compared to using more than two modes,
and that experimental measurements show significant prebuckling
growth of more than two model components (Ref. 2). On the other
hand, since it was an objective of this work to compare the end
result of the Galerkin method used by Arbocz and Babcock with a
potential energy derived solution, it was considered appropriate to
use the simplest model for radial displacement which captures the
essential nature of the physics, i. e., the two mode case. As will
be described subsequently, the parametric study of sensitivity to
imperfections also dictated simplicity from a computational time
standpoint.
A second objective of this work was to carry out a numeri
cal study of imperfection sensitivity using as a basis the data from
a recent investigation conducted by Arbocz and Babcock (Ref. 6).
This work, which uses an imperfection model introduced by Irnbert
(Ref. 7), clearly showed that proper modal decomposition of imper
fections should include asymmetric components, and should include
a decay of imperfection amplitudes with increasing wave numbers.
The numerical work presented in this paper is an expansion
on this topic. Presented herein is a parametric study which shows
the effect that various decay rates have on the buckling load, when
buckling can be dominated by lower order modes, and how the
various parameters of the imperfection models proposed in refer
ence 6 are interrelated.
-4-
II. THEORETICAL FORMULATION
This section is devoted to the derivation of the appropriate
algebraic equations which represent an approximate solution to the
nonlinear Donnell equations. The approach taken is to solve the
inplane equilibrium for the displacements u and v after an assumption
is made on the radial displacement wand the initial imperfection Vi.
The third equilibrium equation is satisfied in an approximate manner
using the Potential Energy Theorem.
1. Donnell Shell Equations
Using the nonlinear Donnell equations, the two inplane equi-
librium equations for an isotropic cylindrical shell may be written
(in terms of displacement) as:
2 2 2 a u+(l-v) au +(l+V ) a v - G -~ 2 ~ 2 axay - - l(w,w) ax ay 222 a v + (1 - v) a v + ( 1 +v ) a u -
-2 -2- -Z -2- axa = -G2(w,w) ay ax y
where the operators G1
(w, Vi) and G2
(w, w) are given by:
and
G (w, Vi) = a2w. a(w+Vi) + (1 +v ) Ow. a
2 (w+w)
1 ax2 ax 2 ay axay
2 + (l-v) aw 2 ay2
a(w+w) + ~ Ow + ax R ax
2 - 2 + a w. Ow + (1 +v) Ow. ~ ax2 ax 2 ay axay
2-+(l-v)aw. Ow 2 ay2 ax
(1 )
(2)
(3)
-5-
2 - 2 -- 0 w o(w+w) + (I+v) Ow 0 (w+w) + G2 (w, w) = -2 • oy -Z ax· axoy oy
2 - 2-+ (I-v) 0 w • o(w+w) + .!.. Ow + 0 w. Ow +
2 ax2 oy R oy oy2 oy
+ (1 +v) Ow • 2 2-
o w + (I-v) 0 w Ow ( 4) 2 ax oxoy -2- ax2· oy
2. Mode Selection
Assuming the following representation for the displacement w
and the imperfections w:
w = £1 t cos i7r ~ + £2t sin k7r l cos.£ f + £3t (5)
w = ~1 t cos i7r ~ + ~2t sin k7r I. cosl f ( 6)
and performing the operations given by G I and G2 , the right hand
side of equations (1) and (2) are given by: .
G I (w, w) = Al sin 2i7r ~ + A2 sin i7r l +
+ A3 sin 2k1T I. + A4 cos k7r l cos.£ f +
+ A5 sin 2k7r l cos 2.£ f +
+ A6 cos(itk)7r l cosl f +
+ A7 cos(i .. k)7r l cosl f (7)
-6-
G 2 (w, Vi) = BI sin21 i + B2 cos2k7T ~ sin21 ~ +
+ B3 sin(i+k)7T L sinl f +
+ B 4 sin(i-k)7T ~ sinl f +
+B . k x . Y S sm 7T L sml R
where the coefficients A. and B. are given in Appendix I. 1 1
(8)
A particu-
lar solution to the two inplane equilibrium equations is then obtained.
It is assumed that the form of the displacements u and v are given by:
and
up = a l sin 2i7T ~ + a 2 sini7T ~ +
+ a 3 sin 2k7T I. + a 4 COSk7T ~ cosl ~ +
+ as sin 2k7T ~ cos 21 ~ +
+ a 6 cos(i+k)7T ~ cosl i +
+ a 7 cos(i-k)7T L cosl ~
vp = b l sin21 i + b 2 cos2k7T ~ sin21 i
+ b 3 sin(i+k)7T ~ sinl ~ +
+ b 4 sin(i-k)7T L sinl f +
b 'kx 'nY + S sm 7T L smA: R
(9 )
(I 0)
-7-
Note that periodicity of the circumferential displacement is satisfied
without the need of introducing a homogeneous solution as is necessary
in a stress function approach (Ref. 4).
Differentiating u and v as given by the left hand side of p p
equations (1) and (2), and equating coefficients of like trigonometric
terms, algebraic equations which determine the coefficients of u p
and v are obtained, i. e., the coefficients a. and b. are determined p 1 1
in terms of the coefficients A. and B.. These coefficients are given 1 1
in Appendix II.
3. Boundary Conditions
In order to satisfy the boundary conditions on the displace-
ment u, one must find an appropriate homogeneous solution
u(x, y) = u (x, y) + u + ulx P 0 (11 )
The boundary condition at x = 0 is
u(O, y) = 0 (12)
or
u = -u (0, y) o p
now
up(O, y) = a 4 cosl i + a 6 cosl i + a 7 cosl i
The satisfaction of this boundary condition with the simplified homo-
geneous solution is not possible. However, an "average" type
boundary condition, i. e.
27TR f [up(O,y) + U o ] dy = 0 o
can be satisfied and gives
u = 0 o
-8-
The stress resultant Nx
at x = L will be used to determine u 1 0
4. Stress Resultants
Using the constitutive relations
N x _ Et ( - ~ € +v€ )
I-v x Y
Et N =--2(€ +v€)
y I-v y x
N = xy Et
y 2(1+v) xy
and the strain-displacement relations
8u 1 Ow Ow Ow € =-+-(-+2-)-
x Ox 20x 0x0x
8v w 1 Ow Ow Ow € =-+-+-(-+2-)-
Y 8y R 2 8y 8y 8y
8u 8v Ow Ow Ow Ow Ow Ow Y =_+_+_0_+_0_+-0-xy 8y Ox Ox 8y 8y Ox Ox 8y
the stres s resultants are given in terms of displacement as:
(13 )
( 14)
-9-
N -2 x [au 1 Ow Ow Ow] ( 1- v ) - = - + - (- + 2 -) - +
Et Ox 2 Ox ax Ox
+ v [OV + w + ..!. ( oW + 2 ow) Ow] oy R 2 oy oy oy
N -( 1 - v 2) Ef = v [~ + ~ ( : + 2 ~;) :] +
+ [OV + w + 1.. (Ow + 2 Ow) Ow] oy R 2 oy oy oy
N a a - -2(1+v) 2Y = ~ + 2 + [Ow. o(w+w)] + Ow. Ow (15)
Et oy Ox Ox oy oy ox
Since the displacements are now fully determined, one has that:
_ Et { Y... x Y.. Nx - --2 Nl + NS cos2l R + N6 smk7T L cosl R I-v
+NS sin(i+k)7T i cosl f +
+N9 sin(i-k)w ~ cosl i} (16)
Et { . x x N = --2 M1 + M2 COSl7T L + M3 cos 2k7T L y I-v
+M6 sin k7T l cosl f +
+MS sin(i+k)7T l·COSl i +
+M9 sin(i-k)w ~ cosl i} (17 )
-IO-
N = Et {p cosk17' x sin£ y + xy 2(I+v) 1 L R
+P 3 cos(i+k)17' r. sin£ f +
+p 4cos(;-k)" L smi it}
The coefficients N., M., and P. are given in Appendix III. 1 1 1
In order to determine u1
, one must enforce that
217'R J [Nx(L, y) - at] dy = 0 o
Et Et v Nx(L, y) = -.:-2 Nl + --2 N5 cos 2£ R
I-v I-v
therefore
2 a N = (I-v) E 1
(18 )
(19 )
(20)
Since the coefficient Nl in equation (16) contains the as yet undeter
mined coefficient u1
, one has that:
vt t 2 i17' 2 1 2 u 1 = - It ~3 - 2 (1:) (2 £1 + ~1 ~1)
t 2 k17' 2 £ 2 1 2 - 4" [(r) + v (R)] ('2 £2 + ~2~2)
2 a + (I-v) E
Note that this means that N is given by x
(21)
-11-
Nx = at + { Et 2 N 5 cos 21 f + I-v
Et N . k x Y --2 6 sIn 1T L cosl R + I-v
+ Et2 NS Sin,(itk)1T l cosl i + I-v
+ ~ N9 sin (i-k)1T x cosl Y..} I-v L R
(22)
5. Potential Energy
It can be shown that the total potential energy can be written as
(Ref. 4):
U=U l +U2 +U3 (23)
where:
Ul
= strain energy due to the bending moments (M , M , M ) x y xy
U 2 = strain energy due to the straining of the middle surface
by the membrane forces (N , N , N ) x y xy
U 3 = wo rk done by the load.
These terms are given by the integrals:
Et 3 21T R L {2 2 } U I = 2 J J (K +K ) -2(l-v)(K K -K ) dxdy
24(l-v ) 0 0 xx yy xx yy xy
1 21fR L{ 2 2 } U 2 = 2Et J J (Nx +Ny ) -2(l+v)(Nx N y -Nxy ) dxdy
o 0
21TR
U 3 = - J o
L a Nx(L, y) J ~ dx dy
o (24)
-12-
But it is also true that
K = w, xx xx
K = w . yy , yy C=~3(1_v2)
K =w xy 'xy
thus the integral U I is given by
U I
3 217R L { 2 = Et 2 f f (w, xx + w, yy)
Bc 0 0
-2(I-v)(w, • w, -w~ >}dXdy (25) xx yy xy
also
211'R{ } U 3 = ta f u(L, y)-u(O, y) dy o
yielding:
U 3 = 211' R ta u I L (2 6)
The integrals UI
and U2
are readily integrable. It should
be noted that many of the trigonometric forms which result from
the various products have no contribution to the total potential
energy. The result is as follows:
-13-
The total potential energy is given by
5 . 4 2 22} U - Et 11'RL {(~) t: 2 + 1 [(k11') + (1)] s2
- 2 L '='1 "2" L R 2 8c
{ 2 a vt t
2 i 11' 2 1 t: 2 t: "E )
+ 211'RLta (I-v )E -1f£3 - Z("L) (2'='1+'='1 5 1
t 2 k11' 2 1. 2 1 2 } - "'4 [( T) + v (R) ] (2' s 2 + S 2 ~ 2 )
+ 11'RLEt {N2 + 1.. N 2 + 1.. N 2 + 1.. N 2 + 1.. N 2 (I_v2)2 1 2 5 4 6 4 8 4 9
+ M2 + .!. M2 + 1.. M2 + 1.. M2 + 1.. M2 + .!. M2 } 1 222 3 4 648 4 9
+ 11'RLEt 8(l+v) {
2 2 2} PI + P 3 + P 4
-2v11'RLEt { 1 II} ---;:;:2-:2~ Nl Ml +"4 N 6M 6 + 4 N8M 8 + 4 N9M 9
(I-v )
k11' 2 1. 22 11'RLEt 11'RLEt [(T) +(R) ]
+ M M + (l_v2 )2 2 3 (1_v2 )2 2(1)4
R N6N 9 (27)
As an expression of minimization of total potential energy. it
is enforced that:
aU _ aU _ aU - 0 ~-arz-~-
(28 )
Taking these partial derivatives and performing algebraic \
simplification yields the following three equations:
-14-
VA c 2 1 Z ""E £3 =7 -z i3 (z£z + £Z s 2) (29 )
(A c. - A) £ 1 + C 8 [ £ 1 ( £ Z + ~ 2) + ~ 1 £ Z] (£ Z + ~ Z) + 1
1 Z -C1 (Z£2+£2~Z) - C ZO £Z(£Z+~2) = AS1
(30)
1 Z c (ACk-A)£Z + (C 9+C10 )(Z £2+£2S 2)(£2+ S Z) +
+Cll [£1(£2+;2) + II £2] (£l+I l) +
-C4 £1 (£2+~Z) - C 3 [2£Z(£1 +%1) + £1£2] = AIz (31)
The coefficients in these equations are given in Appendix IV. Cozn-
parison of these equations to those of Arbocz and Babcock (Ref. 2)
will reveal that they are identical if one reverses the sense of the
radial displaceznent. (Ref. 2 uses positive inward vice outward. )
-15-
Ill. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
1. Imperfection Model
As given in equation 6, the shell im.perfections were asswned
to be fully des cribed by two modal components, one generalized axi-
symmetric mode and one asymmetric mode, i. e. ,
Vi = sIt co s i7r ~ + I2 t sin k'1l' ~ co s £ i
Following the method of modeling given in reference 7, the ampli-
tudes II and ~2 are considered to have wave number dependence.
Decay constants are introduced which decrease the amplitude with
increasing wave nwnber:
I = 1
I2 =
XA .q 1
X
kr £8
(32)
(33)
Nwnerical values for the five parameters (XA
, X, q, r, s)
were obtained experimentally by Arbocz and Babcock (Ref. 6) by
fitting data for 31 different shells. In order to conduct a parametric
study which would include values representative of that experimental
work and be reasonably conservative of computational time, the
following numerical values were used in the computations:
XA
= O. OS, O. 10, 0.20
X = -0.50, -1. 00, -2. 00
q = 1. 0, 2. 0, 3. 0
r = O. 5, 1. 0, 1. 5
s = O. 5, 1. 0, 1. 5
-16-
Hence, 243 different imperfection amplitude models were used in
computation. Eight different wave number combinations were used.
As will be described subsequently, wave numbers were chosen such
that quadratic terms (as well as cubic) were included in the analysis,
and all asymmetric modes fell along the Koiter circle.
2. Shell Geometry and Material Properties
Throughout the numerical analysis, the geometry and mater
ial properties of the shell were held constant. The following numer
ical values were used:
R = 4.00
L = 7.00
-3 t = 4. 64 x 10
v = O. 30
3. Wave Numbers and Mode Shape Parameters
The quadratic terms in the buckling equations will vanish
identically unless the restriction i = 2k is enforced. Without the
quadratic terms, these equations describe a structure insensitive
to imperfections. Accordingly, the relationship i = 2k was main
tained in all calculations.
The wave numbers of the asyrn.rn.etric mode term were
chosen so that this mode corresponded to one of the so-called classi
cal modes of the Koiter circle. This insures minimization of the
asyrrunetric buckling load. For a discussion of this topic, the
reader is referred to Irnbert (Ref. 7). The Koiter circle is de-
fined by the relationship
-17-
2 2 a k - a k + 13 = 0
or 132
= ak(l-ak ) (34)
with the restriction that for positive, nonzero i.
ak < 1
In practice, the computational scheme was coded to perform
the following operations:
(I) The wave number k was entered (a whole number)
along with shell geometry and properties.
(2) The mode shape parameter ak
was computed.
(3) 13 was computed based upon this computed value
of ak
using equation 34.
(4) The wave number i. was computed from the value
of 13, then rounded to the nearest integer value.
( 5) 13 was then recomputed based upon the rounded
value of i.. This value was then used to compute
all coefficients of the buckling equations.
Accordingly, the values of a k and 13 were such that they were
very close to but not exactly on the Koiter circle.
4. Numerical Procedure
Equation 30 can be solved for £1 as follows:
£1 = (1);3+XI);4)
(ljJ6-X ) ( 35)
-lB-
The expressions for the terms lfJ· are given below. Using this 1
expression for the displacement amplitude Sl' the second buckling
equation may be written as a cubic polynomial in A:
3 2 A + El A + E2 A + E3 = 0
The coefficients E. are given by: 1
El = (l(J1-2l(J6) + l(J4( lfJ 2l(J4-lfJ S)
E2 = lfJ6(l(J6 - 2lfJ l +l(J4l(JS)+lfJ3(2lfJ2l(J4-l(JS)
2 E3 = lfJ6(lfJllfJ6+lfJ3lfJS)+lfJ2lfJ3
The expres sions for l(J. are as follows: 1
_ AckS2 l(JI- - - (C +C )(1 c
2 c (S +I ) 9 10 Z':>2+ S2 S 2)
2 2
2 Cll II s2
(s2+I 2)
4J2 = -Cll
2C3~1 s2 + ----
(s2+~2)
1 2 4J3 = C l (Z S2+ S2I 2) + C 20S2 (S2+I 2)
-CBSI S2(S2+S 2)
lfJ4 = II
( 36)
ljJs C ll SI (2£2+S2)
(£2+S2)
ljJ6 = Xc. + C 8(£2+S2)2 1
+
-19-
C 3(2£2+S2)
(£2+S2) + C 4
Since the im.perfection am.plitudes were given by equations 32
and 33, and the m.ode shape param.eters determ.ined as in paragraph
3 above, one then has a polynom.ial of the form.:
3 2 X + EI (£2)X + E 2(£2)X + E 3(£2) = 0
The com.putational schem.e was coded to solve for the buckling load
as follows:
( 1) The displacem.ent am.plitude £2 was increm.ented
from. the origin, using very sm.all steps.
(2) The polynom.ial was solved to obtain the lowest
real root.
( 3) The slope of the X vs £2 trace was then com.puted.
(4) The value of X at which one first attains a zero
slope was specified as the buckling load.
-20-
IV. DISCUSSION OF NUMERICAL RESULTS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Effect of Varying the Axisym.m.etric Model Pararn.eters
(XA
and q)
As shown by figures 3 through 8, the traces of buckling load
versus wave nurn.ber for rn.odels which have q = 2. 0 and 3. 0 coalesce,
regardless of the value of XA
• The reader is referred to Table III
for a corn.parison of the nurn.erical values listed for rn.odels 49, 76,
130, 157, 211, and 238 - all of which have identical asyrn.rn.etric
rn.odel pararn.eters. Loads for these rn.odels are plotted on figure
5. For these six rn.odels, the spread between the highest and
lowest calculated buckling load is O. 01300 for k = 1. 0, decreasing
by a factor of roughly one half as wave nurn.ber increases by two,
to a spread of O. 00194 at k = 14. O. This behavior is repeated for
other cases (a total of 27 plots were possible of the type
shown in figures 3 through 8). In rn.ore understandable terrn.s, it
is recalled that the decay constant q operates on the wave nurn.ber i,
and that i = 2k. It is also true that the axisyrn.rn.etric arn.plitudes
are assurn.ed to be srn.aller nurn.erically than the asym.m.etric arn.pli
tudes, and that the decay rate q is higher (2.0 and 3.0) than assurn.ed
values for rand s (1. 5 is the highest). For the cases where q is
2. 0 or 3. 0 therefore, the axisyrn.rn.etric irn.perfections are not only
srn.all in corn.parison to the as yrn.rn.etric rn.odels, but the corn.puted
loads show that changes in the pararn.eters X A and q produce only
very srn.all changes in the algebraic equations, i. e., in this case
the coupling is weak.
-21-
Using numerical values fo r comparison, in figure 5, models
76 and 211 are plotted. Imperfection amplitudes for these cases are:
for k = 1. a
model 76 model 211
r = O. as = o. 00 625 1 ( 2)3
c: 0.20 s 1 = --2 = O. 05
( 2)
I = -2.00 = -0. 63246 2 (l 0)0.5 I2 = - O. 63246
A = 0.74368 A = O. 73068
for k = 14.0
model 76 model 211
I = O. 05 = O. 00000 1 ( 28)3
I = O. 20 = O. 00026 1 ( 28)2
g2 = -2.00 ( 14)1. O( 27) 0.5 = -0.02749 £2 = -0. 02749
A = 0.80224 A = O. 80030
Of the six models shown on figure 5 with q = 2.0 and 3.0, model 76
has the smallest II and model 211 the largest.
For a given asym.m.etric model, changes in the axis ym.m.etric
model do not change the sensitivity of the shell to long versus short
wave imperfections. It is seen on these plots that as the axisym.m.et-
ric imperfection amplitudes increase, the traces shift downward,
but do not appreciably change in curvature.
-22-
Because of the observed behavior of the data for q = 2. 0 and
3. 0, it was po s sible to neglect the data for 135 of the 243 models as
being repetitive. Hence it is possible to show all significant data on
twelve figures, each having nine common traces.
2. The Asymmetric Model - the Effect of Varying X
As can be seen in figures 9 through 20, as X increases, a
translation downward of the buckling load trace occurs, without
appreciably altering the curvature of the trace. The behavior is
very similar to the case for varying X A' although somewhat more
pronounced.
In the range of values chosen for X, changes in this parameter
do reduce the buckling load, but do not influence the sensitivity of
the shell to long versus short wave imperfections. It was also
noticeable that as X becomes large, there is some tendency for
short wave sensitive structures to shift the wave number for mini
mum buckling load from k = 14 (or greater) to k = 11. This can also
be seen in Table III where underlined loads are in the column for
k = 12. One should realize, of course, that while the lowest buck
ling loads listed in Table III or shown on the figures are at k = 14,
it is certainly true that in some cases buckling may be dominated by a
higher wave number. However, no data are presented for these
cases.
3. The Asymmetric Model - the Effect of Varying s
As can be seen by comparing figures 21 through 32, as s is
increased, all other parameters held constant, the traces tend to
collapse and shift upward, with curvature changes occurring which
-23-
shift the m.inim.um. buckling load to short wave sensitivity. Only in
the cases where the axis yrn.m.etric im.perfections are sm.all and decay
rapidly (XA
= 0. OS; q = 2.0,3.0) is low wave num.ber (long wave)
buckling observed when s gets large (1. 5). In other cases, since s
is the decay rate operating on the circurn.ferential wave number i.,
and since 1 varies from. 1 ° to 27, a high value of s tends to m.ake
the asyrn.m.etric im.perfection am.plitude nearly equal to the axisyrn.-
m.etric im.perfection am.plitude. In that case, buckling is dom.inated
by classical short wave im.perfections.
It would perhaps be clearer to review the m.eaning of the
various decay rates and the numerical range of wave numbers on
which these decay rates operate. For the asym.m.etric m.ode1, the
decay rate r operates on the axial wave nurn.ber, k, which ranges
from. 1. ° to 14. 0. The decay rate s operates on the circumferential
wave nurn.ber, 1, which in this case varies from. 10. ° to 27.0. Both
rand s were varied from. 0.5 to 1.5. If both decay rates have the
value 0. 5, then at k = I, the asyrn.m.etric im.perfection am.plitude
is given by:
r2 = X ° 5 -(1) • (10)°·5
At k = 14, the sam.e term. is given by:
X ~ = --2 (14)0.5 (27)0.5
That is, the axial decay rate r decreases the am.plitude by a factor
of approxim.ate1y 4, while the circurn.ferential decay rate s does the
sam.e by a factor of less than 2 in going from. low wave numbers to
-24-
high wave numbers.
For rand s equal to 1. 0, the asymmetric imperfection ampli
tude is decreased by a factor of 14 for r, while for s this factor is
less than 3. At rand s equal to 1. 5, the effect is even greater, as
the decay with circumferential wave number is much greater than
that for axial wave number.
4. The Asymmetric Model - the Effect of Varying r
Of all the parameters in the imperfection models, the parame
ter r was found to have the greatest influence in shifting the sensitivity
of the shell from classical short wave imperfections to long wave
imperfections. As can be seen in figures 9 through 20, if the decay
of asymmetric imperfections with axial wave number is relatively
low (r = 0.5), then buckling is always dominated by short wave im
perfections, regardless of variations of the other four parameters.
As r is increased to 1. 5, many models show a shift to long wave
sensitivity, the greatest sensitivity occurring when X and rare
both large (2. 0 and 1. 5 respectively).
5. Items Which Induce Short Wave I:mperfection Sensitivity
a. If the decay of asymmetric imperfections with increasing
axial wave number is relatively slow (r = 0.5), then
buckling is dominated by short wave imperfections,
regardless of other factors.
b. If the axisymmetric imperfections are large and decay
slowly in comparison to the asymmetric imperfections,
then short wave imperfections dominate (compare fig
ures 19 and 20 to figures 13 and 14).
-25-
c. If the asymmetric imperfections are nearly equal in
magnitude to the axisym.m.etric imperfections, then
buckling is dominated by short wave imperfec
tions. The important parameter in causing the
axisym.m.etric imperfection to have a significant
value is the decay rate q.
6. Items Which Induce Long Wave Imperfection Sensitivity
a. If the decay of axisymmetric imperfections with increas
ing axial wave number of this mode is relatively high
(q = 2.0,3.0) and the decay of the asym.m.etric imper
fections is high ( r = 1. 0, 1. 5), then buckling is
dominated by long wave imperfections. If
however, the decay of asym.m.etric imperfections with
increasing circumferential wave number gets suffi
ciently large (s = 1. 5, X = 0.5) then this effect is lost.
This is, however, not an interesting case, for in
realistic terms, this means that the imperfections
are virtually non-existent - the decay rates are simply
too high.
b. With large axisymmetric imperfections decaying
slowly with wave number, it is necessary to have
large asym.m.etric imperfections decaying rapidly
with axial wave number and slowly with circumfer
ential wave number to have long wave dominance.
The most striking case of long wave dominance
occurred when X and r were both large.
-26-
7. Sununa ry
Experimental evidence shows that imperfection amplitudes
tend to decrease with wave number. The rate of decrease varies
from shell to shell and covers a fairly wide range. If the decay
constant of the axisyrnrnetric imperfection is greater than one, then
the buckling load becomes insensitive to variations of the decay
constant in this imperfection.
The decay of the asymmetric imperfection amplitude with
wave number is governed by two parameters. The axial wave
parameter appears to be the more important parameter in govern
ing the critical buckling modes. If this parameter is between zero
and somewhat greater than one half, the shell behavior is dominated
by short waves. This results since the size of the imperfection
going from k = 1. 0 to k = 14.0 is decreased by only a factor of ap
proximately 4. Due to the greater imperfection sensitivity of
modes with a k and j3 close to O. 5, this behavior is to be expected.
On the other end of the scale, if r is one to one and one half, the
longer wave imperfections tend to be more important. This is not
true if the decay with circumferential wave number gets sufficiently
large. The behavior between these two extremes is less one sided,
being sensitive to the influence of the decay of the imperfection
with circumferential wave number, the size of the axisymmetric
imperfection, and the axisymmetric imperfection decay rate. The
lack of a clear cut dominance of short or long wave imperfections
in this range of r is unfortunate since much of the available experi
mental data fall in this range. From an experimental point of view. the
-27-
range of r is not too great. However, in this range of r the behavior
is sensitive to all of the other parameters in the model and the effects
must be sorted out with care.
8. Recommendations
The numerical data generated for this study indicates that
further investigation of the decay rate parameters would be enlight
ening. It is clear that one could interpolate between the curves
obtained to gain information regarding behavior of shells with
different values of the parameters X A and X within the range of
values used herein, and that the parameter q is relatively uninter
esting (if greater than one). However, more attention could be
devoted to the decay rates rand s, particularly in view of the fact
that experimentally derived values for these parameters are scat
tered widely between the values 1. 0 and 1. 5. It is apparent that
the nature of shell sensitivity to imperfections changes fairly
rapidly within this range of those parameters.
-28-
REFERENCES
1. Fung, Y. C. and Sechler, E. E.: Instability of Thin Elastic
Shells, Structural Mechanics, Pergalllon Press, 1960.
2. Arbocz, J. and Babcock, C. D.: The Effect of General
Imperfections on the Buckling of Cylindrical Shells, J. of
Appl. Mech., March 1969.
3. Hutchinson, T.: Axial Buckling of Pressurized b:nperfect
Cylindrical Shells, AIAA J., Vol. 3, Aug. 1965.
4. K~rlll~n, T. von and T sien, H. S.: The Buckling of Thin
Cylindrical Shells under Axial COlllpression, J. Aeronautical
Sci., Vol. 8, No.8, p. 302, 1941.
5. Donnell, L. H.: A New Theory for the Buckling of Thin
Cylinders under Axial COlllpression and Bending. Trans.
of A. S. M. E., Vol. 56, p. 795, Nov. 1934.
6. Arbocz, J. and Babcock, C. D.: On the Role of Irnperfec
tions in Shell Buckling, Paper presented at the XIII IUT AM
Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Moscow,
Aug. 1972.
7. Illlbert, J.: The Effect of Imperfections on the Buckling of
Cylindrical Shells. Aeronautical Engineer Thesis, Cali
fornia Institute of Technology, June 1971.
-29-
APPENDIX I
Operator Coefficients
2 i1l' 3 1 2 A 1 =t(r) (2£1+£1;1)
v t i1l' ~ A2 = - R (r) ';,1
t 2 k1l' k1l' 2 J. 2 1 2 A3 = - 2" (T) [(T) - v (R) ] (2' ~2+~2~2)
A - ~ (k1l') £ 4-R L 2
t 2 k1l' k1l' 2 J. 2 1 2 A5 = - 2" (T) [(17) + (R)] (2;2 + ~2;2)
_ t2
i1l' [k1l'. 11' (I-v) J. 2] [ c c ] A6 - - 2" (r) (T) (l+k) L + 2 (R) • ~1 (;2+52)+51 ~2
t2
i1l' [k1l'. 11' (I-v) J. 2 [ c c ] A7 = - 2" (1:) (T)(l-k>i - -2- (R)]· ~1(£2+';,2)+sl£2
t 2 £. k1l' 2 J. 2 1 2 Bl = - 2" (R) [v(T) - (R)] (2;2 + ~2;2)
t 2 I. k1l' 2 £. 2 1 2 B2 = - 2" (It) [(T) + (R) ] (2 £2 + £2;2)
t 2 . B3 = 4"" (l{) (~) [(i+k) ~ - v (i -k) D . [;1 (~2+!2)+!1 ~2]
t 2 . B4 = 4"" (l{)( ~) [v (i+k) ~ - (i-k)y) • [~1 (~2+;2)+;1 ~2]
t £. B5 = -R (R)~2
-30-
APPENDIX II
Disp1acem.ent Coefficients
t 2 hI' 1 2
a l =""4 (L)(2 £1 + £1;1)
vt a = - . £
2 R(l7T) 1 L
[ k7T 2 1. l 2 (-) -v (-) t L R
a = -- 1 2 ~ (2 £2 + £2 5 2) 3 8 (k7T)
L
[ k7T 2 1. 2.. t k7T v (17) -(R) J
a = - (-) £ 4 R L [(k7T)2+(!)2]2 2
L R
t2
k7T I 2 ~ as = - 8 (L) ('2£2 + £2 5 2)
2 . ~(~) 2 L
a 6 = {[(i+k)y)2+ (~)2 (li V)}
~ 7T 2 1. 2J L[ (i+k) y) -v (W • [[(i+k)~]2+(ft>2J2
• {(i7T)(!) [(i+k).!(!) (l+v )] L R L R 2
- [(Hk);) + (Ii v) (:/l}. [t1 (tZ+;Z)+;1 tzl
21 (i7T)(k7T) (i7T)2(!)2 a =_~ L L + L R
7 2 [( i-k).!] [( i-k).!] L L
IV[(i-k)L]2_(!)2] I [(i_k)~]2+(!)212 •
• [£1 (£2+;2) + ~1 £2]
-31-
Z [v (~)Z -(~1 (!. gZ + sz";Z) t 2 2 b = - 8 (!)
1 R
[ £. 2 k11' 2 t £. (R) +(T) (v +2)]
b = - - (-) £ 5 R R [ ( k7r ) 2 + (!) 2,2 2
L R
t 2 £. 1 2
b 2 = - 8" (R) (Z g2 + g2~2)
2 (i11')2(!)r[(i+k)~]2 -v (i)2] b _~ L R~ L R
3 - 2 [[ (i+k) ~]2 + (~)2J2 • [gl(g2+;2)+~lg2]
~[' 11'] 2 £. 2] t 2 i11' 2 £. ~ (l-k) L -v ('R) b = - (-) (-)
4 2 L R r[ (i-k) 11'] 2 + (!)212 ~ L R
• [gl (g2+~2)+rl g2]
-32-
APPENDIX III
Stres s Resultant Coefficients
v t t 2 i1T 2 1 2 N 1 = u l + It" £3 +"2 (1:") (2 £1 + £1 II)
t 2 k1T 2 1. 2 1 2 + "4 [(L"") +v (~ ] (2 £2 + £2I 2)
2 a N -(l-v )E 1 - (when u i is sUbstituted)
t 2 2 k1T 2 1 2 NS ="4 (I-v ) (L"") (2£2 + £2£2)
t N6=R
2 2 (I_v 2 )(k1T) (!)
L R [(~)2~ (~)2]2 - £2
i1T2 1. 4 2 (1:) (:R) (I-v ) t 2
NS =2 [[ (i+k)-t] 2 + (~)2J~
t2
N =-2 9
i1T 2 £. 4 2 (1:) (R) (I-v)
~(i-k>i] 2+(~)2J2
[ £ 1 ( £ 2 + I 2) + II £ 2]
[~1 (£2+;2) + ;1 £2]
2 t 2 a t 2 1 2 2 1 2 c
Ml = (l-v )R £3 +v(I-v ) E +"'4 (~ (I-v )(2 £2+£2 5 2)
2 t t. M2 = (1- v ) R ':> 1
2 t2
1. 2 1 2 'F M3 = -(I-v)"4 (R) (2"£2 + £2 5 2)
-33-
(1_v2)!.. (k7T)4 M = R L ~
6 [t7T)2t(i)2)2 2 L R
t2
MS = 2 (l_V2 )(i7T)2[(Hk) E]2(i)2
L L R
[[ (Hk)i) 2 + (fv2J2
(1 2 i7T 2 2
[51 (52t~2)t~1 52]
t 2 M =-2 9
-v )(L) [(i-k)i) (~2 [[(i-k)DZ + (~)zy [~l(~Z+SZ) + sl~Zl
t P = - R 1
k7T 3 £ (L) (RJ 2(1 + v)
[ (k7T)2 £ 2, 2 ~2 L + (RJ J
2 i7T 2 P _ t (L) (Hk) E (i)3
3 - -(ltv) L R [[(i+k) D Z +(~)J Z [~l (gz +SZ) + Sj gzl
p - t 2 4 -
(ltv)(-\:)2(f>3[(i-k) i) [W-k) D Z +(iJjZ [ g 1 (gz +gz )+g 1 ~Zl
-34-
APPENDIX IV
Mode Shape Param.eter Coefficients
121 A = -2 (Cl!. + -.", ) c. 1 C.
1 Cl!. 1
1 rCl!; + (32
)2 AC = '2 2
k Cl!k
a~ 1 + --2 ~-2 (Cl!k +(3 )
C = 1
2 ~ for i = 2k
2 ' (if i =I' 2k, C1
= 0) 4Cl!.
1
2 2 CCl!.(3
1
C 3 = 2[ Yk
] , for i = 2k (if i=l' 2k, C
3 = 0)
2 C 4 = ~, for i = 2k (if i"* 2k, C
4 = 0)
2Cl!k
c2
2 4 { 1 1} C = - Cl!. (.). -- + --8 4 11-" - -
Yi+k Yi - k
C - c2
(3z4 9 -
4 Cl!k
2 C - c 2 10 --Cl! 4 k
2 c
Cll = T
c C20 = 4
Cl!~(34 1
--z Cl!k
2(.).2 Cl!kl-"
Yk
2 .2 Rt (17')2 Cl!i = 1 2c I.
2 _ k2 Rt (17')2 Cl!k - 2c L
{_1 + _1 }
Yi +k Y i-k
, for i = 2k (if i =I' 2k, C 20 = 0)
-37-
TABLE II
Irn.perfection Model Surn.rn.ary
Model XA
X Nwnber q r s
1 0.05 1.0 O. 5 0.5 0.5
2 0.05 1.0 0.5 O. r. 1.0
3 0.05 1.0 0.5 O. 5 1.5
4 0.05 1.0 0.5 1.0 O. 5
5 O. Ot) 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.0
6 O. 05 1.0 O. 5 1.0 1.5
7 0.05 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.5
8 0.05 1.0 0.5 1.5 1.0
9 0.05 1.0 O. 5 1.5 1.5
10 0.05 1.0 1.0 O. 5 0.5
11 0.05 1. 0 1.0 0.5 1.0
12 0.05 1.0 1.0 O. 5 1.5
13 0.05 1.0 1..0 1.0 0.5
14 0.05 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
15 0.05 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5
16 O. 05 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.5
17 0.05 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0
18 0.05 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5
19 0.05 1.0 2.0 O. 5 O. 5
20 0.05 1.0 2. 0 O. 5 1. 0
21 0.05 1.0 2.0 O. 5 1.5
22 0.05 1.0 2. 0 1.0 O. 5
-38-
TABLE II (Cont'd)
Im.perfection Model Sum.m.ary
Model XA q X r 8 Num.ber
23 0.05 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
24 0.05 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.5
25 0.05 1.0 2.0 1.5 0.5
26 0.05 1.0 2. 0 1.5 1.0
27 0.05 1.0 2. 0 1.5 1.5
28 0.05 2. 0 O. 5 O. 5 0.5
29 O. 05 2.0 0.5 0.5 1.0
30 0.05 2.0 0.5 O. 5 1.5
31 0.05 2. 0 0.5 1.0 O. 5
32 0.05 2. 0 O. 5 1.0 1.0
33 0.05 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
34 0.05 2. 0 0.5 1. 5 O. 5
35 0.05 2.0 0.5 1.5 1.0
36 0.05 2. 0 0.5 1.5 1.5
37 0.05 2.0 1.0 O. 5 O. 5
38 0.05 2.0 1.0 0.5 1.0
39 0.05 2.0 1.0 0.5 1.5
40 0.05 2. 0 1.0 1. 0 0.5
41 0.05 2.0 1.0 1.0 -1. 0
42 0.05 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.5
43 0.05 2. 0 1.0 1.5 O. 5
44 0.05 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.0
-39-
T ABLE II (Cont'd)
Imperfection Model Summary
Model Number X
A q X r s
45 0.05 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.5
46 0.05 2.0 2.0 O. 5 O. 5
47 0.05 2. 0 2. 0 0.5 1.0
48 0.05 2.0 2. 0 0.5 1.5
49 0.05 2.0 2.0 1.0 O. 5
50 0.05 2.0 2. 0 1.0 1.0
51 0.05 2. 0 2. 0 1.0 1.5
52 0.05 2. 0 2. 0 1.5 0.5
53 0.05 2.0 2. 0 1.5 1.0
54 0.05 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5
55 0.05 3. 0 O. 5 O. 5 0.5
56 0.05 3.0 O. 5 0.5 1.0
57 0.05 3. 0 O. 5 0.5 1.5
58 0.05 3.0 O. 5 1.0 0.5
59 0.05 3. 0 0.5 1.0 1.0
60 0.05 3. 0 O. 5 1.0 1.5
61 0.05 3.0 O. 5 1.5 O. 5
62 0.05 3.0 0.5 1.5 1.0
63 0.05 3. 0 0.5 1.5 1.5
64 0.05 3.0 1.0 0.5 0.5
65 0.05 3.0 1.0 0.5 1.0
66 0.05 3.0 1.0 0.5 1.5
67 0.05 3.0 1. 0 1.0 O. 5
-40-
T ABLE II (Cont'd)
Im.perfection Model Summary
Model XA q X r s Number
68 0.05 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
69 0.05 3. 0 1.0 1.0 1.5
70 O. 05 3. 0 1.0 1.5 O. 5
71 0.05 3. 0 1.0 1.5 1.0
72 0.05 3.0 1.0 1.5 1.5
73 0.05 3. 0 2.0 O. 5 0.5
74 0.05 3. 0 2. 0 O. 5 1.0
75 0.05 3. 0 2. 0 0.5 1.5
76 0.05 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.5
77 0.05 3.0 2. 0 1.0 1.0
78 0.05 3.0 2. 0 1.0 1.5
79 0.05 3. 0 2.0 1.5 0.5
80 0.05 3. 0 2. 0 1.5 1.0
81 0.05 3.0 2.0 1.5 1.5
Notes:
1. For models 82 through 162 inclusive, XA
becomes 0.10, all other parameters sequence as in models 1 through 81.
2. For models 163 through 243 inclusive, X A becomes 0.20, all other parameters sequence as in models 1 through 81.
3. In all cases, the sign of the axisymmetric imperfection is positive (outward) while the asymmetric imperfection is always negative (inward).
TA
BL
E I
II
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s, ~
"t
crl
Wav
e N
mn
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
M
od
el
Nw
nb
er
1 0
.88
98
2
0.8
74
12
0
.85
52
1
0.8
43
01
0
.82
59
6
0.8
08
84
o.
795
23
O. 7
9485
2 0
.94
79
4
0.9
42
32
0
.93
68
1
0.9
33
95
0
.92
55
7
0.9
12
24
O
. 89
521
0.8
85
88
3 0
.97
56
7
0.9
72
24
0
.96
93
1
0.9
68
99
0
.96
34
7
0.9
52
94
0
.93
48
1
0.9
19
84
4 0
.88
98
2
0.8
98
24
0
.90
34
0
0.9
06
30
0
.90
09
5
0.8
91
47
O.
878
73
0.8
73
77
5 0
.94
79
4
0.9
52
99
0
.95
61
7
0.9
58
55
0
.95
44
0
0.9
45
13
O.
928
66
0.9
15
62
6 0
.97
56
7
O.
9768
6 0
.97
68
4
0.9
78
12
0
.97
38
6
0.9
64
89
O.
946
85
0.9
29
79
7 0
.88
98
2
0.9
17
67
0
.93
47
3
0.9
42
88
O.
941
51
0.9
34
73
O
. 92
081
0.9
10
44
I ~
.....
8 0
.94
79
4
0.9
61
52
0
.96
85
0
0.9
72
32
0
.96
92
6
0.9
61
16
O.
944
08
0.9
28
04
I
9 0
.97
56
7
O. 9
8052
0
.98
16
0
0.9
83
18
0
.97
91
2
0.9
70
55
O.
952
20
0.9
33
86
10
0.8
28
83
O
. 80
768
0.7
82
56
0
.76
62
5
O. 7
4692
O.
730
71
O. 7
2187
O.
727
96
11
0.9
18
09
0
.91
22
9
0.9
06
64
0
.90
26
7
O. 8
9305
0
.87
85
0
O.
8628
7 0
.85
72
6
12
0.9
61
49
0
.95
91
7
0.9
57
45
0
.95
71
6
0.9
51
45
0
.94
01
6
O. 9
2256
0
.90
97
9
13
0.8
28
83
0
.84
43
0
0.8
55
21
0.8
60
39
0
.85
59
7
0.8
47
84
O.
838
74
0.8
39
20
14
0
.91
80
9
0.9
28
96
0
.93
68
1
0.9
40
81
0
.93
73
3
0.9
28
13
0
.91
31
0
O. 9
0315
15
0.9
61
49
0
.96
64
4
0.9
69
31
0
.97
15
5
0.9
67
75
0
.95
87
7
O. 9
4133
0
.92
56
6
16
0.8
28
83
0
.87
41
2
0.9
03
40
0
.91
64
6
0.9
17
42
0
.91
22
4
O. 9
0114
0
.89
49
4
17
0.9
18
09
0
.94
23
2
0.9
56
17
0
.96
24
0
0.9
60
50
0
.95
29
4
O.
9369
8 0
.92
29
2
18
0.9
61
49
0
.97
22
4
0.9
76
84
0
.97
95
5
0.9
76
03
0
.96
76
6
O. 9
4976
0
.93
21
7
TA
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
BU
ckli
ng
Lo
ad
s,
X
. crl
t
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
IIll
p e
rfe c
tio
n
1 2
4 6
8 10
12
14
M
od
el
NU
Illb
er
19
O. 7
38
04
O.
70
93
4
0.6
76
9()
0
.65
72
3
0.6
38
24
0
.62
63
5
0.6
25
45
0
.64
05
2
20
0.8
71
92
0
.86
58
3
0.8
60
11
0
.85
48
9
0.8
44
21
0
.82
89
7
0.8
15
91
0
.81
50
8
21
0.9
39
25
0
.93
86
3
0.9
38
81
0
.93
86
5
0.9
32
75
0
.92
05
2
0.9
03
84
0
.89
39
4
22
O.
73
80
4
O. 7
63
07
0
.78
25
()
0.7
91
74
O.
78
98
7
0.7
85
11
o.
7817
9 O.
789
27
23
0.8
71
92
0
.89
15
4
0.9
06
()1
0
.91
32
5
0.9
11
00
O.
90
22
8
O.
8895
0 0
.88
36
2
24
0
.93
92
5
0.9
50
03
0
.95
74
5
0.9
61
18
0
.95
81
3
0.9
49
19
O
. 93
270
0.9
19
03
25
0
.73
80
4
0.8
07
68
O
. 85
521
0.8
75
84
0
.88
07
1
0.8
78
50
0
.87
16
2
0.8
71
01
I ~
26
0.8
71
92
0
.91
22
9
0.9
36
81
0
.94
68
3
0.9
46
80
0
.94
01
6
0.9
25
94
0
.91
46
8
N
I
27
0.9
39
25
0
.95
91
7
0.9
69
31
0
.97
37
9
O.
9711
5 0
.96
31
2
0.9
45
89
0
.92
94
8
28
0.8
94
54
0
.88
10
1
0.8
63
21
0
.85
19
3
0.8
36
26
0
.82
06
7
O.
8082
5 0
.80
77
9
29
0.9
53
02
0
.94
98
2
O.
94
58
'; 0
.94
44
4
0.9
38
78
0
.92
98
7
0.9
18
73
0
.91
21
7
-,--
30
0.9
80
93
0
.98
00
3
0.9
78
71
0
.98
01
2
0.9
78
04
0
.97
39
8
0.9
67
42
0
.95
97
7
31
0,8
94
54
0
.90
53
5
0.9
12
0)
0.9
16
29
0
.91
33
7
0.9
07
63
0
.89
97
2
O. 8
9712
32
0
.95
30
2
0.9
60
61
0,
9654'~
0.9
69
48
0
.96
86
3
0.9
65
44
O
. 95
945
0.9
53
16
33
0
.98
09
3
0.9
84
69
0
.98
63
()
0.9
89
43
0
.98
88
2
0.9
87
14
O.
983
64
0.9
76
92
3
4
0.8
94
54
O.
92
49
7
O.
943
7'~
0.9
53
53
0
.95
52
8
0.9
54
11
O
. 94
955
0.9
45
37
35
0
.95
30
2
0.9
69
21
0
.97
79
? 0
.98
35
1
0.9
84
03
0
.98
30
2
0.9
79
80
0
.97
37
5
36
0.9
80
93
0
.98
83
9
0.9
91
1H
0
.99
45
9
0.9
94
28
0
.99
34
0
0.9
91
28
0
.98
47
5
TA
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s, X
"t
crl
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nu
mb
er
37
O.
83
31
3
0.8
13
97
O.
789
72
O.
7739
7 O
. 7
55
34
O.
739
72
0.7
31
10
O
. 73
679
38
0.9
22
98
0
.91
95
2
0.9
15
28
0
.91
26
0
0.9
05
22
0
.89
38
6
O.
8818
3 O.
877
46
39
0.9
66
66
0
.96
68
4
0.9
66
72
0
.96
80
7
0.9
65
57
0
.96
00
2
0.9
51
73
0
.94
44
1
40
O.
83
31
3
0.8
50
92
0
.86
32
4
O.
8696
0 0
.86
70
7
0.8
61
50
O.
855
17
0.8
56
72
41
0.9
22
98
0
.93
63
5
0.9
45
83
0
.95
14
2
0.9
50
95
0
.94
69
8
0.9
40
07
0
.93
50
1
42
0.9
66
66
0
.97
41
8
0.9
78
74
0
.98
27
3
0.9
82
47
0
.98
03
8
0.9
76
10
0
.96
94
3
43
0.8
33
13
O
. 88
101
n.9
12
01
0
.92
66
3
0.9
30
38
0
.92
98
7
0.9
25
71
0
.92
39
1
44
O
. 9
22
98
0
.94
98
2
0.9
65
43
0
.97
34
1
0.9
74
95
O.
973
98
0.9
70
27
0
.96
47
1
45
0.9
66
66
0
.98
00
3
0.9
86
36
0
.99
08
8
0.9
91
07
0
.99
01
9
0.9
87
78
0
.98
14
4
I *'" 46
0
.74
17
9
O.
7147
5 0
.68
29
5
0.6
63
39
0
.64
45
4
0.6
32
65
0
.63
15
5
0.6
46
19
w
I
47
0.8
76
53
0
.87
26
3
0.8
68
21
O.
864
01
0.8
54
98
0
.84
17
0
O. 8
3040
O.
829
83
48
O. 9
44
28
0
.94
60
9
0.9
47
86
0
.94
92
2
0.9
46
22
0
.93
87
7
0.9
28
92
0
.92
25
6
49
0.7
41
79
O.
768
96
O.
7897
2 O.
799
85
O.
7992
6 O
. 79
598
O.
7939
8 0
.80
17
7
50
0.8
76
53
0
.89
85
9
0.9
15
28
0
.92
33
7
0.9
23
75
0
.91
91
8
O. 9
1209
0
.90
92
7
51
0.9
44
28
0
.95
76
2
0.9
66
72
0
.97
21
7
0.9
72
50
0
.96
99
0
0.9
64
66
0
.95
84
9
52
0.7
41
79
0
.81
39
7
0.8
63
24
O
. 88
531
0.8
92
51
0
.89
38
6
0.8
91
65
O.
893
77
53
0.8
76
53
0
.91
95
2
0.9
45
83
0
.95
75
6
0.9
60
75
0
.96
00
2
0.9
55
99
O.
951
71
54
0
.94
42
8
0.9
66
84
O.
()7
874
O. 9
8501
0
.98
60
1
0.9
85
18
0
.98
23
6
0.9
76
30
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
X
0t
crl
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nu
mb
er
55
0.8
96
91
O.
882
73
0.8
64
25
0
.85
26
8
0.8
36
91
0
.82
12
8
0.8
08
82
0
.80
82
8
56
0.9
55
58
0
.95
17
1
0.9
46
97
0
.94
53
2
0.9
39
63
0
.93
08
0
0.9
19
85
O.
913
35
57
0.9
83
58
0
.98
19
9
0.9
79
93
0
.98
10
6
0.9
78
98
O
. 97
511
0.9
69
16
0
.96
23
2
58
0.8
96
91
0
.90
71
4
0.9
13
10
0
.91
71
3
0.9
14
16
0
.90
84
8
9.9
00
70
0
.89
81
2
59
0.9
55
58
0
.96
25
2
0.9
66
60
0
.97
04
1
0.9
69
54
0
.96
65
2
O. 9
6105
O.
955
33
60
0.9
83
58
0
.98
66
7
0.9
87
56
0
.99
03
9
0.9
89
79
0
.98
83
5
0.9
85
74
0
.98
11
5
61
O.
8969
1 0
.92
68
0
0.9
44
86
0
.95
44
3
0.9
56
17
0
.95
51
5
0.9
51
01
0
.94
72
9
I ~
62
0.9
55
58
0
.97
11
5
0.9
79
11
0
.98
44
6
0.9
84
98
0
.98
42
0
0.9
81
80
0
.97
74
4
~
I
63
0
.98
35
8
0.9
90
37
0
.99
23
9
0.9
95
55
0
.99
52
5
0.9
94
65
0
.99
36
3
0.9
90
79
64
O
. 83
531
0.8
15
56
O.
790
63
O.
7746
2 O.
755
87
0.7
40
18
O
. 73
150
O.
7371
2
65
0.9
25
45
0
.92
13
4
0.9
16
37
0
.91
34
3
0.9
06
00
0
.89
46
6
0.8
82
69
0
.87
82
8
66
O.
96
92
6
0.9
68
77
0
.96
78
9
o. 96
899
0.9
66
48
0
.96
10
8
0.9
53
21
0
.94
63
0
67
0
.83
53
1
o. 85
259
0.8
64
25
O
. 87
038
0.8
67
78
O.
862
21
o. 85
590
0.8
57
42
68
0
.92
54
5
0.9
38
22
O.
94
69
7
0.9
52
32
O.
95
18
3
0.9
47
98
0
.94
14
0
0.93
661
69
0.9
62
96
0
.97
61
3
0.9
79
93
0
.98
36
7
0.9
83
42
0
.98
15
5
0.9
78
02
0
.97
28
0
70
0.8
35
31
0
.88
27
3
0.9
13
10
0
.92
74
9
0.9
31
20
0
.93
08
0
0.9
26
89
0
.92
52
8
----
71
0.9
25
45
O.
951
71
0.9
66
60
0
.97
43
4
0.9
75
88
0
.97
51
1
0.9
72
07
0
.96
77
1
72
0.9
69
26
0
.98
19
9
0.9
87
56
0
.99
18
4
0.9
92
03
0
.99
14
1
0.9
90
01
O.
986
55
TA
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
A
0t
crl
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
Il1
.1.p
erfe
ctio
n
1 2
4 6
8 10
12
14
M
od
el
Nu
mb
er
73
O. 7
43
68
0
.71
61
1
0.6
83
70
0
.66
39
0
0.6
44
94
0
.63
29
7
O. 6
3181
0
.64
64
0
74
0
.87
88
2
0.8
74
35
O
. 8
69
23
0
.86
47
8
0.8
55
66
O
. 84
236
0.8
31
04
0
.83
04
0
75
0.9
46
81
0
.94
79
7
0.9
49
00
O
. 95
011
0.9
47
08
0
.93
97
4
0.9
30
14
0
.92
39
1
76
O. 7
43
68
O
. 77
045
0.7
90
63
0
.80
05
3
0.7
99
86
O.
79
65
4
O.
7945
1 0
.80
22
4
77
0.8
78
82
0
.90
03
7
0.9
16
37
0
.92
42
2
0.9
24
56
0
.92
00
7
0.9
13
16
0
.91
04
0
78
0.9
46
81
0
.95
95
3
0.9
67
89
0
.97
31
0
0.9
73
42
0
.97
10
1
0.9
66
35
0
.96
09
3
79
0.7
43
68
O
. 81
556
0.8
64
25
0
.88
61
1
0.8
93
26
0
.89
46
6
0.8
92
58
0
.89
47
4
I ~
80
0.8
78
82
0
.92
13
4
O. 9
46
97
0
.95
84
6
0.9
61
65
0
.96
10
8
0.9
57
54
0
.95
38
5
U'I I
81
0.9
46
81
0
.96
87
7
0.9
79
93
0
.98
59
6
0.9
86
96
0
.98
63
7
O. 9
8443
0
.98
04
7
82
0.8
80
53
0
.86
50
4
0.8
46
19
0
.83
34
8
0.8
15
37
O.
797
09
O.
7828
2 O.
782
85
83
0.9
37
89
O.
93
24
3
0.9
26
67
O
. 92
279
0.9
12
09
0
.89
54
6
O. 8
7525
0
.86
58
2
84
0
.96
52
8
0.9
61
98
0
.95
87
2
0.9
57
14
0
.94
87
1
0.9
33
37
0
.91
02
0
0.8
95
28
85
0.8
80
53
0
.88
88
7
0.8
93
73
0
.89
56
5
0.8
88
25
0
.87
58
7
0.8
60
38
O.
855
11
86
0.9
37
89
0
.94
29
7
0.9
45
76
O
. 94
691
0.9
39
96
0
.92
61
5
O. 9
0484
0
.89
16
6
87
0.9
65
28
0
.96
65
5
0.9
66
14
0
.96
61
0
0.9
58
72
0
.94
44
1
O.
9205
5 0
.90
38
4
88
0.8
80
53
0
.90
80
8
O.
92
46
2
O.
93
15
4
0.9
27
51
0
.91
64
7
O. 8
9798
0
.88
71
9
89
0.9
37
89
0
.95
14
0
0.9
57
91
0
.96
04
1
0.9
54
28
0
.94
09
8
0.9
18
18
0
.90
23
6
90
0.9
65
28
0
.97
01
7
0.9
70
83
0
.97
10
6
0.9
63
78
0
.94
96
2
0.9
25
11
0
.90
73
6
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s, ~
't
crl
Wav
e N
Ull
lber
, k
In~perfection
1 2
4 6
8 10
12
14
M
od
el
NU
lllb
er
91
0.8
20
30
O.
799
42
O. 7
7450
O.
758
00
O. 7
3820
O
. 72
1 t.
0.7
f27
8
0.7
19
38
92
0.9
08
41
0
.90
27
6
0.8
96
91
0
.89
20
8
0.8
80
59
0
.86
36
0
0.8
45
91
O.
840
32
93
0.9
51
29
0
.94
90
7
0.9
47
02
0
.94
55
5
0.9
37
11
0
.92
15
3
O. 8
9955
0
.88
66
3
94
0
.82
03
0
0.8
35
57
0
.84
61
9
0.8
50
57
0
.84
45
8
0.8
34
44
0
.82
36
4
0.8
23
93
95
0
.90
84
1
0.9
19
23
0
.92
66
7
0.9
29
51
0
.92
34
7
0.9
10
32
O.
891
19
0.8
80
89
96
0
.95
12
9
0.9
56
26
0
.95
87
2
0.9
59
65
0
.95
28
3
0.9
38
78
0
.91
58
2
0.9
00
29
97
0
.82
03
0
0.8
65
04
0
.89
37
3
0.9
05
62
0
.90
42
0
O.
8954
6 0
.88
05
6
0.8
73
76
I *'"
98
0.9
08
41
0
.93
24
3
0.9
45
76
0
.95
06
9
0.9
45
84
0
.93
33
7
0.9
12
08
O.
897
93
0- I
99
0.9
51
29
0
.96
19
8
0.9
66
14
0
.96
74
9
0.9
60
81
O.
c4
69
7
0.9
23
00
0
.90
59
0
10
0
O. 7
3068
O.
702
25
0.6
70
28
0
.65
06
4
0.6
31
69
c .
. 9
90
0
.61
93
0
0.6
34
85
10
1 O.
862
85
O.
8568
6 0
.85
10
5
0.8
45
16
0
.83
31
3
O.
b164
0 O.
802
31
0.8
01
72
10
2 0
.92
93
4
0.9
28
78
0
.92
86
4
0.9
27
39
0
.91
90
4
0.9
03
22
0
.88
29
8
0.8
72
87
1
03
O.
730
68
O.
75
53
4
O. 7
7450
O.
783
08
0.7
80
17
O
. 77
425
0.7
70
10
O.
777
62
10
4
O.
8628
5 0
.88
22
5
O. 8
9691
0
.90
24
7
0.8
97
99
O.
88
60
7
0.8
70
12
0
.86
38
2
105
0.9
29
34
0
.94
00
7
0.9
47
02
O
. 94
949
0.9
43
56
0
.92
99
4
0.9
08
35
0
.89
45
8
----
106
O.
7306
8 O
. 79
942
0.8
46
19
0
.86
57
4
0.8
68
61
0
.86
36
0
O. 8
5391
0
.85
26
4
10
7
0.8
62
85
0
.90
27
6
0.9
26
67
0
.93
54
2
0.9
32
62
0
.92
15
3
0.9
02
50
0
.89
08
5
10
8
0.9
29
34
0
.94
90
7
0.9
58
72
0
.96
18
5
0.9
56
11
0
.94
27
9
0.9
19
74
0
.90
35
5
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
ntI
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
A
.t
crl
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nu
mb
er
109
0.8
89
82
O
. 87
871
O.
8620
8 0
.85
11
1
0.8
35
56
0
.82
00
3
0.8
07
66
O.
807
28
110
0.9
47
94
0
.94
73
0
0.9
44
53
0
.94
34
7
0.9
37
88
0
.92
89
0
0.9
17
58
0
.91
09
6
111
0.9
75
67
0
.97
74
2
0.9
77
38
0
.97
91
0
0.9
77
05
0
.97
28
0
0.9
65
65
0
.95
72
9
112
0.8
89
82
0
.90
29
7
0.9
10
78
0
.91
53
7
0.9
12
53
O.
90
67
5
0.89
871
0.8
96
10
113
0.9
47
94
0
.95
80
6
0.9
64
10
0
.96
84
8
O.
9676
5 0
.96
43
0
O. 9
5781
O.
951
04
11
4
0.9
75
67
0
.98
20
7
0.9
84
99
0
.98
83
9
0.9
87
80
0
.98
58
9
0.9
81
53
0
.97
33
4
I
115
O.
8898
2 0
.92
25
3
0.9
42
44
0
.95
25
5
0.9
54
35
0
.95
30
3
0.9
48
06
0
.94
35
0
..r:.
-J
116
0.9
47
94
0
.96
66
4
0.9
76
56
0
.98
24
8
0.9
83
02
0
.98
17
8
0.9
77
78
0
.97
04
8
I
11
7
0.9
75
67
0
.98
57
6
0.9
89
80
0
.99
35
4
0.9
93
24
O.
992
11
0.9
88
96
0
.98
02
4
118
0.8
28
83
0
.81
18
7
O.
7886
9 O
. 77
326
O.
7547
7 O
. 73
923
O. 7
3069
O.
736
45
119
0.9
18
09
0
.91
71
1
0.9
14
04
0
.91
16
8
0.9
04
39
0
.89
30
2
0.8
80
93
O.
876
61
12
0
0.9
61
49
0
.96
42
7
0.9
65
39
0
.96
70
7
0.9
64
61
0
.95
89
1
0.9
50
22
0
.94
25
7
121
0.8
28
83
O
. 84
870
0.8
62
08
0
.86
87
6
0.8
66
32
0
.86
07
5
O. 8
5441
0
.85
60
0
122
0.9
18
09
0
.93
38
8
0.9
44
53
0
.95
04
5
0.9
50
03
0
.94
59
3
0.9
38
70
0
.93
34
0
12
3
0.9
61
49
0
.97
15
9
O.
9773
8 0
.98
17
0
O. 9
8146
0
.97
91
7
0.9
74
10
0
.96
65
0
12
4
0.8
28
83
O
. 87
871
0.9
10
78
0
.92
56
9
0.9
29
49
0
.92
89
0
0.9
24
49
0
.92
25
2
125
0.9
18
09
O
. 9
47
30
0
.96
41
0
0.9
72
40
0
.97
39
6
0.9
72
80
0
.96
84
6
0.9
62
08
126
0.9
61
49
0
.97
74
2
0.9
84
99
0
.98
98
4
0.9
90
04
0
.98
89
2
0.9
85
56
0
.97
74
1
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s. ~
"t
crl
Wav
e N
um
.ber.
k
Im.p
erf
ecti
on
1
Mo
del
Nu
m.b
er
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
127
O.
73
80
4
0.7
12
94
0
.68
20
9
0.6
62
82
0
.64
41
1
0.6
32
32
0
.63
12
8
0.6
45
98
128
0.8
71
92
0
.87
03
5
0.8
67
06
O.
863
17
0.8
54
25
0
.84
10
1
0.8
29
74
0
.82
92
5
129
0.9
39
25
0
.94
35
9
0.9
46
56
0
.94
82
5
0.9
45
30
0
.93
77
6
0.9
27
67
0
.92
12
0
130
O. 7
38
04
O.
766
99
O.
7886
9 0
.79
91
0
O.
79
86
3
O.
7953
9 O
. 79
343
0.8
01
28
131
0.8
71
92
0
.89
62
3
0.9
14
04
0
.92
24
4
0.9
22
88
0
.91
82
5
0.9
10
99
0
.90
81
1
13
2
0.9
39
25
0
.95
50
8
0.9
65
39
0
.97
11
6
0.9
71
52
0
.96
87
4
0.9
62
94
0
.95
61
5
133
0.7
38
04
0
.81
18
7
0.8
62
08
0
.88
44
4
0.8
91
71
0
.89
30
2
0.8
90
70
0
.89
27
8
I >f:>. co
13
4
0.8
71
92
0
.91
71
1
0.9
44
53
0
.95
65
7
0.9
59
80
0
.95
89
1
0.9
54
42
0
.94
96
2
I
135
0.9
39
25
0
.96
42
7
0.9
77
38
0
.98
39
8
0.9
84
99
0
.98
39
3
0.9
80
27
O.
972
81
136
0.8
94
54
0
.88
21
5
O.
86
41
0
0.8
52
61
0
.83
68
7
0.8
21
25
O
. 80
880
0.8
08
26
13
7
0.9
53
02
0
.95
10
8
0.9
46
80
0
.94
52
4
0.9
39
57
0
.93
07
5
0.9
19
80
0
.91
33
1
13
8
0.9
80
93
0
.98
13
3
0.9
79
76
0
.98
09
7
0.9
78
91
0
.97
50
5
0.9
69
08
0
.96
22
2
139
0.8
94
54
0
.90
65
5
0.9
12
95
0
.91
70
6
0.9
14
11
0
.90
84
4
0.9
00
65
0
.89
80
8
14
0
0.9
53
02
0
.96
18
8
0.9
66
43
0
.97
03
2
0.9
69
48
0
.96
64
7
0.9
60
98
0
.95
52
5
141
0.9
80
93
O.
986
01
0.9
87
39
0
.99
03
0
0.9
89
72
0
.98
82
8-
0.9
85
64
0
.98
09
7
142
0.8
94
54
0
.92
61
9
0.9
44
70
0
.95
43
5
0.9
56
11
0
.95
50
9
0.9
50
94
0
.94
72
1
14
3
0.9
53
02
0
.97
05
0
0.9
78
94
0
.98
43
7
0.9
84
92
0
.98
41
3
0.9
81
71
0
.97
72
9
14
4
0.9
80
93
0
.98
97
1
0.9
92
22
0
.99
54
6
0.9
95
19
0
.99
45
8
0.9
93
53
0
.99
05
0
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
A
0t
crl
Wav
e N
mn
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nm
nb
er
14
5
0.8
33
13
0
.81
50
3
O. 7
9050
O
. 77
456
O.
75
58
4
O.
7401
5 O
. 73
148
O. 7
3711
146
0.9
22
98
0
.92
07
3
0.9
16
22
0
.91
33
6
0.9
05
95
0
.89
46
2
O.
8826
5 O.
878
25
14
7
0.9
66
66
O
. 96
812
0.9
67
73
0
.96
89
1
0.9
66
42
0
.96
10
3
0.9
53
15
0
.94
62
3
14
8
0.8
33
13
O
. 85
203
O. 8
64
10
O
. 87
031
0.8
67
73
0
.86
21
7
0.8
55
87
0
.85
73
9
149
0.9
22
98
0
.93
75
9
0.9
46
80
0
.95
22
4
0.9
51
77
O
. 94
792
0.9
41
34
0
.93
65
5
15
0
0.9
66
66
0
.97
54
8
0.9
79
76
0
.98
35
9
0.9
83
35
O.
981
49
0.9
77
93
0
.97
26
7
151
0.8
33
13
0
.88
21
5
0.9
12
95
0
.92
74
1
0.9
31
15
0
.93
07
5
0.9
26
84
0
.92
52
3
I ,f>.
15
2
0.9
22
98
0
.95
10
8
0.9
66
43
0
.97
42
5
0.9
75
81
0
.97
50
5
0.9
71
99
0
.96
76
0
-0
I
15
3
0.9
66
66
O
. 98
133
0.9
87
39
0
.99
17
5
0.9
91
97
0
.99
13
5
O.
9899
1 0
.98
63
2
15
4
0.7
41
79
0
.71
56
6
0.6
83
59
0
.66
38
6
0.6
44
91
0
.63
29
6
0.6
31
80
0
.64
63
9
15
5
O. 8
76
53
O
. 87
378
0.8
69
09
0
.86
47
1
0.8
55
62
0
.84
23
2
0.8
31
01
0
.83
03
8
156
0.9
44
28
0
.94
73
4
0.9
48
84
0
.95
00
3
0.9
47
02
0
.93
96
9
0.9
30
08
0
.92
38
6
15
7
O.
7417
9 O.
769
95
O.
79
05
0
0.8
00
47
O
. 79
982
O. 7
9651
o.
794
49
0.8
02
22
15
8
0.8
76
53
O
. 89
978
0.9
16
22
0
.92
41
4
0.9
24
51
0
.92
00
2
0.9
13
11
0
.91
03
6
15
9
0.9
44
28
0
.95
88
9
0.9
67
73
0
.97
30
2
0.9
73
36
0
.97
09
5
0.9
66
28
0
.96
08
3
16
0
O. 7
4179
0
.81
50
3
O. 8
64
10
0
.88
60
3
0.8
93
21
0
.89
46
2
0,8
92
54
0
.89
47
0
161
0.8
76
53
0
.92
07
3
0.9
46
80
0
.95
83
8
0.9
61
59
0
.96
10
3
0.9
57
47
0
.95
37
7
16
2
0.9
44
28
0
.96
81
2
0.9
79
76
0
.98
58
8
0.9
86
90
O.
986
31
0.9
84
34
0
.98
02
9
TA
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s, ~
"t
crl
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nu
mb
er
163
0.8
62
37
0
.84
72
8
0.8
28
58
0
.81
50
6
O. 7
9525
O.
775
42
O.
7607
0 0
.76
18
8
16
4
0.9
18
30
0
.91
30
7
0.9
06
91
0
.90
12
6
0.8
86
84
0
.86
57
6
O.
8430
1 0
.83
49
7
165
0.9
44
99
0
.94
19
2
0.9
38
08
0
.93
43
4
0.9
21
23
0
.89
97
2
O.
87
28
4
0.8
60
13
166
0.8
62
37
0
.87
05
4
0.8
74
86
0
.87
50
9
0.8
64
36
0
.84
80
1
0.8
30
06
0
.82
57
5
16
7
0.9
18
30
O.
923
36
0.9
25
48
0
.92
44
8
0.9
13
03
0
.89
32
9
O. 8
6832
O.
857
06
168
0.9
44
99
0
.94
63
8
0.9
45
29
0
.94
29
6
0.9
30
60
0
.90
94
9
O. 8
8154
0
.86
74
3
169
0.8
62
37
0
.88
92
9
0.9
04
91
0
.90
97
0
0.9
01
35
0
.88
46
6
O. 8
6250
0
.85
32
4
I \J1
17
0
0.9
18
30
0
.93
15
9
0.9
37
30
0
.93
74
8
0.9
26
44
0
.90
64
5
O.
87
95
4
0.8
66
17
0 I
171
0.9
44
99
0
.94
99
1
0.9
49
85
0
.94
77
3
0.9
35
32
0
.91
40
7
0.8
85
34
0
.87
04
4
172
0.8
03
63
O.
78
32
0
O. 7
5876
0
.74
19
9
O. 7
2152
O
. 70
452
0.6
95
97
O.
703
67
17
3
0.8
89
56
0
.88
41
0
0.8
77
95
0
.87
16
5
0.8
57
12
0
.83
68
2
O.
8173
5 O.
812
91
17
4
0.9
31
35
0
.92
93
1
0.9
26
70
0
.92
31
8
0.9
10
35
0
.88
91
8
0.8
63
83
0
.85
27
4
175
0.8
03
63
0
.81
85
3
0.8
28
58
0
.83
15
7
0.8
23
01
0
.81
00
5
O.
7975
7 O
. 79
856
176
0.8
89
56
0
.90
01
8
0.9
06
91
0
.90
77
4
0.8
97
55
0
.87
91
4
O. 8
5671
O.
847
87
17
7
0.9
31
35
0
.93
63
3
0.9
38
08
0
.93
67
5
0.9
25
08
0
.90
45
0
O. 8
7756
0
.86
44
0
178
0.8
03
63
0
.84
72
8
0.8
74
86
0
.88
47
0
0.8
79
42
0
.86
57
6
0.8
47
56
0
.84
17
8
179
0.8
89
56
0
.91
30
7
0.9
25
48
0
.92
81
3
0.9
18
53
O.
89
97
2
O. 8
7442
0
.86
23
8
18
0
0.9
31
35
0
.94
19
2
0.9
45
29
0
.94
43
0
O.
93
25
5
0.9
11
73
O.
883
61
0.8
69
19
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
A
't
crl
Wav
e N
um
ber,
k
Imp
erf
ecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nw
nb
er
181
O.
7162
8 0
.68
83
3
0.6
57
18
0
.60
50
0
0.6
19
04
0
.60
75
6
0.6
07
62
0
.62
41
2
18
2
0.8
45
13
O
. 83
929
O. 8
3331
0
.82
63
4
0.8
12
14
O.
79
33
7
0.7
78
40
O.
778
84
18
3
O.
90
99
4
0.9
09
50
O.
908
82
0.9
05
69
0
.89
33
9
0.8
72
76
0
.84
96
6
O. 8
4101
18
4
O.
7162
8 0
.74
01
8
O.
7587
6 O
. 7
66
29
0
.76
16
8
O.
75
40
7
O.
7490
7 O
. 75
715
18
5
0.8
45
13
0
.86
41
0
0.8
77
95
0
.88
16
7
O. 8
7356
0
.85
72
8
0.8
38
55
O.
833
26
186
0.9
09
94
0
.92
05
2
0.9
26
70
0
.92
69
8
0.9
16
40
0
.89
66
6
0.8
71
28
0.
850.
55
----
18
7
O. 7
1628
O
. 78
320
0.8
28
58
0
.84
62
2
0.8
45
80
0
.83
68
2
O. 8
2438
0
.82
36
2
I \J1
18
8
0.8
45
13
0
.88
41
0
0.9
06
91
0
.91
34
3
0.9
06
14
0
.88
91
8
O.
8663
0 0
.85
63
5
......
I
189
0.9
09
94
0
.92
93
1
0.9
38
08
0
.93
88
7
0.9
28
15
0
.90
80
4
0.8
80
86
0
.86
72
0
19
0
0.8
80
53
0
.87
41
2
O. 8
5978
0
.84
94
8
0.8
34
17
0
.81
87
5
O.
8064
6 0
.80
62
7
191
0.9
37
89
0
.94
23
2
0.9
41
95
0
.94
15
5
0.9
36
09
0
.92
69
7
0.9
15
32
0
.90
86
3
192
0.9
65
28
0
.97
22
4
0.9
74
68
0
.97
70
6
0.9
75
07
0
.97
04
6
0.9
62
21
0
.95
29
9
19
3
0.8
80
53
0
.89
82
4
0.9
08
31
0
.91
35
4
0.9
10
84
0
.90
49
8
O.
8967
2 0
.89
41
0
19
4
0.9
37
89
0
.95
29
9
0.9
61
44
0
.96
64
7
0.9
65
72
0
.96
20
5
O.
9546
6 0
.94
71
2
195
0.9
65
28
0
.97
68
6
0.9
82
26
O
. 9
86
32
0
.98
57
7
0.9
83
40
0
.97
75
3
.0.9
67
44
196
0.8
80
53
0
.91
76
7
0.9
39
86
0
.95
06
0
0.9
52
48
0
.95
08
9
0.9
45
17
0
.94
00
0
---
19
7
0.9
37
89
0
.96
15
2
0.9
73
86
0
.98
04
3
0.9
81
02
0
.97
93
5
0.9
73
95
0
.96
49
6
19
8
0.9
65
28
0
.98
05
2
0.9
87
06
0
.99
14
5
0.9
91
18
0
.98
95
5
O. 9
8460
0
.97
36
3
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s.:>
t "t
crl
Wav
e N
UIT
lber
. k
IIT
lper
fect
ion
1
2 4
Mo
del
Nu
m.b
er
6 8
10
12
14
199
0.8
20
30
0
.80
76
8
O. 7
86
64
0
.77
18
4
0.7
53
63
O.
73
82
7
O. 7
2987
O.
735
78
200
0.9
08
41
0
.91
22
9
0.9
11
56
0
.90
98
7
0.9
02
75
0
.89
13
5
0.8
79
16
0
.87
49
4
201
0.9
51
29
0
.95
91
7
0.9
62
73
0
.96
50
7
0.9
62
69
0
.95
67
2
0.9
47
29
0
.93
90
8
202
0.8
20
30
0
.84
43
0
0.8
59
78
O.
86
70
7
O. 8
64
82
0
.85
92
7
o. 85
290
0.8
54
59
203
0.9
08
41
0
.92
89
6
0.9
41
95
0
.91
85
0
0.9
48
18
0
.94
38
5
0.9
36
03
0
.93
03
5
20
4
0.9
51
29
0
.96
64
4
0.9
74
68
0
.97
96
5
O.
9794
6 0
.97
67
6
O. 9
7041
0
.96
14
0
205
0.8
20
30
0
.87
41
2
0.9
08
31
0
.92
38
3
0.9
27
74
0
.92
69
7
0.9
22
07
0
.91
98
6
I U1
N
206
0.9
08
41
0
.94
23
2
0.9
61
44
0
.97
03
8
0.9
72
00
0
.97
04
6
O.
9649
6 0
.95
74
0
I
207
0.9
51
29
0
.97
22
4
0.9
82
26
0
.98
77
6
0.9
88
00
O.
98
64
0
O.
9813
1 0
.97
10
2
---
208
O.
73
06
8
O. 7
09
34
0
.68
03
8
0.6
61
70
0
.64
32
7
0.6
31
65
0
.63
07
4
0.6
45
55
209
0.8
62
85
0
.86
58
3
0.8
64
74
0
.86
15
0
0.8
52
79
0
.83
96
3
O.
8284
2 0
.82
80
8
210
0.9
29
34
0
.93
86
3
0.9
43
97
O.
946
31
0.9
43
48
0
.93
57
6
0.9
25
23
0
.91
85
3
211
O.
73
06
8
O. 7
63
07
0
.78
66
4
O.
7976
2 O.
797
36
O.
79
42
3
O.
7923
3 0
.80
03
0
212
0.8
62
85
0
.89
15
4
0.9
11
56
0
.92
05
8
0.9
21
15
0
.91
64
0
O. 9
0883
0
.90
58
7
213
0.9
29
34
0
.95
00
3
0.9
62
73
0
.96
91
5
0.9
69
57
0
.96
64
5
O. 9
5962
0
.95
18
9
21
4
O.
73
06
8
0.8
07
68
0
.85
97
8
0.8
82
71
0
.89
01
1
0.8
91
35
0
.88
87
8
O. 8
9082
215
0.8
62
85
0
.91
22
9
0.9
41
95
0
.95
46
0
0.9
57
91
0
.95
67
2
0.9
51
37
0
.94
57
7
216
0.9
29
34
0
.95
91
7
0.9
74
68
0
.98
19
3
0.9
82
97
0
.98
14
8
0.9
76
32
0
.96
70
0
TA
BL
E I
II (
Co
nt'
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
A
0t
crl
Wav
e N
UIT
lber
, k
lIT
lpe
rfecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Mo
del
Nu
mb
er
21
7
0.8
89
82
O.
881
01
0.8
63
81
0
.85
24
8
O. 8
36
78
O.
821
19
O. 8
0875
0
.80
82
2
21
8
0.9
47
94
0
.94
98
2
0.9
46
48
0
.94
50
8
0.9
39
46
0
.93
06
6
0.9
19
70
0
.91
32
2
219
0.9
75
67
0
.98
00
3
0.9
79
42
0
.98
08
0
0.9
78
79
0
.97
49
3
O.
9689
3 0
.96
20
2
22
0
0.8
89
82
0
.90
53
5
0.9
12
63
0
.91
69
0
0.9
14
00
0
.90
83
5
0.9
00
57
0
.89
80
0
221
0.9
47
94
0
.96
06
1
0.9
66
10
0
.97
01
6
0.9
69
36
0
.96
63
5
0.9
60
84
0
.95
50
8
222
0.9
75
67
0
.98
46
9
0.9
87
05
0
.99
01
3
o. 9
89
59
0
.98
81
6
0.9
85
46
0
.98
06
2
223
0.8
89
82
0
.92
49
7
0.9
44
38
0
.95
41
8
0.9
55
99
0
.95
49
8
0.9
50
82
0
.94
70
7
I U1
22
4
0.9
47
94
0
.96
92
1
0.9
78
60
0
.98
42
0
0.9
84
79
0
.98
40
1
0.9
81
53
0
.97
70
0
VJ I
225
0.9
75
67
0
.98
83
9
0.9
91
87
0
.99
52
9
0.9
95
06
0
.99
44
5
O.
9933
2 0
.98
99
4
226
0.8
28
83
0
.81
39
7
O. 7
90
24
O.
77
44
4
O.
7557
6 0
.74
01
1
0.7
31
45
O.
737
08
22
7
0.9
18
09
0
.91
95
2
0.9
15
91
0
.91
32
0
0.9
05
84
0
.89
45
4
O.
8825
8 0
.87
81
9
22
8
0.9
61
49
0
.96
68
4
0.9
67
39
0
.96
87
4
0.9
66
30
0
.96
09
2
0.9
53
02
0
.94
60
9
229
0.8
28
83
0
.85
09
2
0.8
63
81
0
.87
01
7
O.
86
76
4
0.8
62
10
0
.85
58
0
0.8
57
34
23
0
0.9
18
09
0
.93
63
5
0.9
46
48
0
.95
20
7
0.9
51
65
0
.94
78
2
0.9
41
23
0
.93
64
3
----
231
0.9
61
49
0
.97
41
8
O. 9
79
42
0
.98
34
2
0.9
83
23
0
.98
13
6
0.9
77
77
0
.97
22
5
232
0.8
28
83
0
.88
10
1
0.9
12
63
0
.92
72
5
0.9
31
04
0
.93
06
6
0.9
26
74
0
.92
51
2
23
3
0.9
18
09
0
.94
98
2
0.9
66
10
0
.97
40
8
0.9
75
69
0
.97
49
3
0.9
71
83
0
.96
73
7
23
4
0.9
61
49
0
.98
00
3
0.9
87
05
0
.99
15
8
0.9
91
84
0
.99
12
2
0.9
89
71
0
.98
58
8
T A
BL
E I
II (
Co
ntr
d)
Bu
ck
lin
g L
oad
s,
A
"t
crl
Wav
e N
um
.ber,
k
Inl.
pe
rfecti
on
1
2 4
6 8
Mo
del
Nu
m.b
er
23
5
O.
73
80
4
O.
7147
5 0
.68
33
7
0.6
63
76
0
.64
48
6
236
0.8
71
92
0
.87
26
3
0.8
68
80
0
.86
45
7
0.8
55
53
23
7
0.9
39
25
0
.94
60
9
0.9
48
51
0
.94
98
7
0.9
46
91
238
O. 7
38
04
O.
768
96
O.
79
02
4
0.8
00
34
O.
79
97
4
239
0.8
71
92
0
.89
85
9
0.9
15
91
0
.92
39
9
0.9
24
40
24
0
0.9
39
25
0
.95
76
2
0.9
67
39
O.
972
85
0.9
73
24
241
O. 7
380·
1 O
. 8
13
97
0
.86
38
1
0.8
85
89
0
.89
31
1
242
0.8
71
92
0
.91
95
2
0.9
46
48
O.
958
22
0.9
61
46
---
24
3
0.9
39
25
0
.96
68
4
0.9
79
42
0
.98
57
0
0.9
86
77
No
tes:
1.
Un
derl
ined
nu
m.b
ers
in
dic
ate
th
e l
ow
est
calc
ula
ted
bu
ck
lin
g
load
fo
r th
at
part
icu
lar
imp
erf
ecti
on
m.o
del
.
2.
Refe
r to
Tab
le I
fo
r w
av
e n
um
.bers
i a
nd
I
co
rresp
on
din
g
to t
he l
iste
d k
.
3.
Refe
r to
Tab
le I
I fo
r d
esc
rip
tio
n o
f th
e i
m.p
erf
ecti
on
ln
od
el
co
rresp
on
din
g t
o t
he l
iste
d m
.od
el n
um
.ber.
10
12
14
0.6
32
92
0
.63
17
8
0.6
46
38
O. 8
4225
0
.83
09
6
0.8
30
34
-.
O.
9395
9 0
.92
99
8
O. 9
2376
O. 7
9645
O.
794
44
0.8
02
19
0.9
19
93
0
.91
30
2
0.9
10
27
0.9
70
84
0
.96
61
3
0.9
60
65
0.8
94
54
O
. 89
245
0.8
94
63
I \}l
0.9
60
92
0
.95
73
3
0.9
53
61
*" I
0.9
86
18
O
. 98
416
o. 9
7995
So
lve
Co
mp
ati
bil
ity
E
qu
ati
on
s (S
tress
Fu
ncti
on
Sati
sfy
P
eri
od
icit
y
of
v U
sin
g
the S
tress
F
un
cti
on
So
lve I
n-P
lan
e
Eq
uil
ibri
um
E
qu
ati
on
s (D
isp
lace
men
t F
orm
ula
tio
n)
No
te (
1)
.---
Inclu
de a
C
on
stan
t T
erm
in
th
e D
is
pla
cem
en
t w
No
tes;
(1)
(Z)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Peri
od
icit
y o
f v
au
tom
ati
call
y s
ati
sfie
d,
I Z
1
Z
F =
Z A
x
-Z
aty
+
fp
va
R
w =
~ +
(A
ssu
med
Mo
des)
+ B
w =
(A
ssu
med
Mo
des
) +
Wv
II e(
x, y).
(A
ssu
med
Mo
de)
dx
dy
= 0
If e
(x,
y) •
aw
(a
r) d
xd
y
1
i. e
..
Z ... R
0
...
0 I
!!:!..
dy
=
By
o
Fig
ure
I.
So
lve
Co
mp
ati
bil
ity
E
qu
ati
on
s (S
tress
Fu
ncti
on
)
Sati
sfy
P
eri
od
icit
y
of
v U
sin
g t
he
Str
es
s F
un
cti
on
Meth
od
s o
f S
olu
tio
n
Sati
sfy
P
eri
od
icit
y
of
v U
sin
g t
he
Dis
pla
cem
en
t w
I
No
te
(1)
So
lve In~Plane
Eq
uil
ibri
um
Eq
uat
ion
s (D
isp
lacem
en
t F
orm
ula
tio
n)
01
01
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
~ 0
.85
~
o o -I 01
0.8
0
c .¥
U ~
CD
0.75
0.7
0
0.65
XA =
0.0
5,0
.10
,0.2
0
q =
2.0
,3.0
........
........
......
"" ""
'---
----
---
----
----
,,""
'---
----
----
----
----
"---
---1
----
----
----
----
---
"'--
,--
----
--1-
----
---_
--
----
----
----
----
Co
mm
on
Po
ra m
e te
rs
X =
0.5
, s=
0.5
r
= 0
.5
----
---- 0.0
5
0.1
0
0.2
0
~ _
_ ~--L. _
__
__
_ ___'~ _
__
__
__
J
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Axia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
de
, k
FI
G.
3 C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G L
OA
D
(J1
-.J
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
-< ~ 0.
85
~
o o -oJ ~ 0
.80
oX
U
~
m 0
.75
0.7
0
0.6
5
" ,~
,,~
" "' ....
.. , "
..........
..........
. ,'"':..
.-.....
.. --....
.....
-.
-
r XA
=0
.05
,O.I
O,O
.20
q
= 2
.0, 3
.0
........
--.
....
........
........
........
........
.. ~ .....
........ -
........
.. ""'"
'-..
---.:
::---
.,.
Com
mon
Pa
ram
ete
rs
---_
------:.
.--_
--
...
-...
--X
= 2.0
, s =
0.5
--
--
---
----
-
q= J
.Oi
XA
= 0
.05
0
.10
0
.20
r =
0.5
--------
------------
---7
--
----
----
,--
--
2 4
6 8
10
12
Axia
l H
alf
Wov
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k
FIG
.4
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
--- --.~ -
_ ---
-1
14
(}1
CD
-<
~
o
1.00
0.9
5
0.9
0
0.85
.3 0
.80
o c:
~
0.75
::
I a:
I
0.70
0.6
5
",.
. ....
-----
,,/'-
' --
----
" ,,/
---,./
,"""""
//
"
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
X =
2.0
, S
= 0
.5
r =
1.0
2
XA
= 0
.05
,0.1
0,0
.20
q
=2
.0,3
.0
---------------
---------
---
-------
---
4
--------------------
q=
I.O
j X
A =
0.0
5
0.1
0
0.2
0
---
_ _
_ ~ _
__
__
.1._
_ _
__
_ _'
6 8
10
12
14
Axia
l H
alf
Wa
ve N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
de
, k
FIG
.5
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
01
<D
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
0.85
...(
~ ~ 0
.80
-I
C
I c::
~ 0.
75
::I
III
0.7
0
0.6
5
-,/;'.",,----
,.. -
,.."
..
-;'./
-.
;',/
,..-,/./
./
"/,
"..
"/"
./
'/
/ ./
'1//./
'11
/
f/
i/
/ / Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
><
=2
.0,5
=0
.5
r =
I. 5
-------
XA
= 0
.05
,0.1
0,0
.20
q=
2.0
,3.0
-----------------
----
----
----
--
q =
1.0
; X A
=
---
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Axia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
de
, k
FIG
.6
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KLI
NG
LO
AD
en
o
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
-<
0.85
~
0 0 ...J
0.8
0
0>
c ~
U
:J
0.7
5
CD
0.70
0.65
XA
= 0
.05
,0.1
0,0
.20
q
=2
.0,3
.0
,,---
----
--
"" .-
'-""
,,-
--------
------
-...
----
-..~
--
----
----
---
---
"/
;"
,,""
.-
/ "",-
'" ""
" /
/ /
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
te r
s
X =
2.0
, s=
1.0
r
= I.
5
2
---
--...---
-----
q =
1.0
; X A
= 0
.05
:J \----
0.10
0
.20
--
~---~--
-~
4 6
8 10
12
14
A
xia
l H
alf
Wov
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,k
FIG
.7
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
(j)
1.0
0
0.9
5
0.9
0
-< ~
~
0.8
5
o -'
co
c = 0.
80
~
CJ
::J
CD
0.7
5
0.7
0
O
__
__
__
__
__
_
__
0
10
0.2
_
__
__
_
~ _
__
__
__
_
X. ~O.
05. .
• _
---
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
\q ~ 2.0
~ -=-.
..:--=-
-=-__
____
_
_ _ .. _
____
____
_
--------------
II --
----
--
-.....
-
.....
.....
.. ...-
.....
-'"
-....
".,
.;
'
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
X=
2.0
,s=
1.5
q =
1.0;
XA
= 0
.05
0
.10
0
.20
----
0.6
5 t-
r =
I. 5
2 _1
4
6 8
10
Axia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,k
FIG
.8
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
~
12
14
en
I\)
1.00
0.9
5
0.9
0
0.8
5
-<
~
0.8
0
0 -.J 01
C
~
0.7
5
u ::I
CD
0.7
0
0.6
5
---
--------
s =
1.5.
X =
0.5
-1
.0
2.0
----
------
-----------
~
----
----
----
--------
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
------:...""---=~--------------
T--
.'to
, X
'0.5
:'J r-
-~:':"
~=-~ -
----
-----
-----
1.0
--' I
----
"','"
--------
--------
------
1----
-2.0~
----
----
-
------
------
-----=
---if
-0
5
X =0.
5~
s -
.•
1.0
"-.,
2 0L
'-.
...,'-
. .
--',
---~
--------
-----
--------
----
---
----
----
----
-C
om
mo
n
Pa
ram
ete
rs
X A=
0.0
5
r =
0.5
q
= 1.
0
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Axia
l H
alf
W
ave
N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,k
F J G
. 9
CO
M P
UT
ED
B
U C
K L
I N
G
LO
A D
m
~
-< ~
o o
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
-l
0.8
0
at c: ~ g
0.75
II
I
0.7
0
0.6
5
.... -
"' .....
2.0
------~------------
__
-------
I __ --
------
------------------]1---~---
/'~'
.
I ./
P
O.5
,X.O
.5) I
1.0
j 2
.0
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
XA
=0
.05
r=
I.O
q =
1.0
2 I
I I
I
4 6
8 10
12
14
A
xia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k
FIG
.IO
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G
LO
AD
en
~
-<
'tJ 0 0 -I
00
c:
~
U
:::J
m
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
0.8
0
0.75
0.7
0
/'
/ /
/ . / /
.-
/"
---' ~~-----
• .--'
s= 1
.0,X
= 0
.5 ~\
./"'
I. 0
-.-J
. ...
-'./
" 2
.0
./
Co
mm
on
Pa
ram
ete
rs
XA
= 0
.05
r
= 1
.5
--... _
---
-------------------
s =
0.5
, X
= 0
.5.J
\ 1.
0 ~
2.0
0.65
r q
= 1.
0
2 4
6 8
Axia
l H
alf
W
ave
Of
Asym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k
FIG
. II
CO
M P
UT
ED
S
UC
KL
IN G
LO
A 0
10
12
14
m
01
1.00
095r
-----
_
0.90
.-<
0.85
-,:)
o o -I
08
0
co
c ~ g
0.7
5
m 0.
70
06
5
----
----
------
----
---.
----
----
------
-=--
~.--
----
----
---
----
----
----
----
----
-
----
----
----
----
--------
--------
,----
-Jj
. -I
OX
=0
.5
s-.,
1
.0
-2
.0
---..
. -----.
. --
------
------
------
---~--
]: ------
O 5
X
= 0.
5
s= .,
1.0
.......... ,
2.J
..........
_----
----
----
-..-
----
--~
---
------
------
-----
----
----
---
Co
mm
on
Pa
ram
ete
rs
XA
=
0.0
5,
r =
0.5
q =
2.0
,3.0
2 4
68
Ie
12
14
A
xia
l H
alf
W
ove
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
M
od
e,k
FIG
.12
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KLI
NG
L
OA
D
en
en
1.0.0.
0.95
0.90
.
;(
~
0.85
c o ..J co
c
o..S
O
~
<.J
:::J m
0..7
5
0..7
0.
-------------
/ .-- #-
;:..
-:;:
:-~
s~ 1.5
~ X =-?.
g~
__
-......
........
2.
0. _
__
------
/ #
-
/ --
------
---~--
------
-~\~--
------
-~ - -
/ ~-
-s
= 1
.0.,
X =
0..5
1.
0.
2.0
.
-----
----
----
--l\
~ \---~--
--\
~.....
..-~--
-S
= 0
._5,
X = 0
..5 j
,/
I. 0
. ~
2.0
.
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
X A =
0..0
.5,
r =
1.0.
o..6
5~
q =
2.0.
I I
I I
I I
I
2 4
6 8
10.
12
14
Axia
l H
olf
W
ave
~u m
be
r o.
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k
FIG
. 13
C
o.M
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LI
NG
Lo
.AD
en ~
1.00
0.95
0.90
.-< -0
.85
~ o o .J go 0.
80
~
U
::J
CD
0.75
0.7
0
~
\ ....-
.. ~_-
-_--=------u--n~r-nu--u-.----
_u __
____ -~
...--. .
,," _
_ _
_ _
.... .:;:::..
::. :::.=
-=: :;::
.:::::::: ~ _-::
...:::::..
.= -: -
-1~\ -r
=--=--= =
-=--= -
=-= ::--
=-:--=
:_ -=-
=--: _
____
~ __ -
=-=-=-
=: "
_ r
---
/ __
--=
::--
_----
f /.~.,__
_--
----
----------------r-.-
-----
/~//
--' --
.ll //
//;:.
:~X=0.
5-'~ _
__ --
----
-;~-
,X=~
.5 ---------~--
Jf--
----
/ 1.
0 -
1.0
S=
0.5
,X=
0.5
j I
./-
2.0
1.
0 ./
2.0
2
.0
.I /
/ /'
I
Co
mm
on
Pa
ram
ete
rs
0.65
1-X A
;: 0
.05
, r
=1.5
q;:
2.0
2 4
6 8
10
Axia
l H
alf
W
all;
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
M
od
e,k
FIG
.14
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
Ci<
LIN
G
LO
AD
t _
__
~
12
14
m
0)
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
~0.85
'1:1 o o -'
00
.80
c ~
u :;)
Q)
0.7
5
0.7
0
0.6
5
s= 1
.5,
X =
0'5
-!~
/.0
J
2.0'/1 I
----
---r--
-----
-----_
__ _
--
----
·h--
--_
__
__
__
__
_
----
----
----
-~:;:O
.X-;-f
b
______
______
______
_ _
~,--
~~:j--
------
------
--'---,
--
----
---
----
----
----
--------------~---~--------
------
-5
-)------_
__
__
__
_ s
=0
.5, X
= ?.-O
t ---
....
2.0
'---.... ---
------
--~---
----__
7
~ ---
jJ __
____
____
_
""--~
--------
--C
omm
on
Pa
ram
ote
rs
XA
=0
.10
, r
=0
.5
Q=
1.0
2
--------
------ --
----
-. --
-~----------
__ 1
I
I
4 6
8 A
xia
l H
alf
W
ove
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
Mo
de
, k
FIG
. 15
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G
LO
AD
10
__
__
L 12
----
-14
(j) w
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
~ -~
~ 0
80
-I 01
C
~ 0.
75
;:)
OJ
0.70
0.6.
5
----=-=-=~=-=-=-=::-:.;;;;:-:--.-----==---=========
_ ---=
-----=
T
_
__
__
__
.,..r-
__
---
-_
__
_
s=
1.5
,X=
0.5
1
.0-
2.0
----
----
----
----
----
----
...--
-------
~
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
-----~:
--=---
------
---~--
------
------
---
~--I
-O X
:0.5
----
:;-:
::-
s =
.,
1.0
__
__
_ _
-
-2
0
__
__
__
_ _
__
__
__
__
_
---
----
--
. --.-
--
-~
-~ ,-'
'05
X =O.~
-,-
s-.•
1.
0
,-'
2.07
_-
-,-
-,--
~ --------------
------
-- --
----/-
/'
Com
mon
Pa
ram
ete
rs
x A=
0.1
0, r
= I.
0
q=
I.O
~-----------~. ----------~----------
_1
6
__
__
__
1 I
I J
2 4
8 10
12
14
A
xia
l H
alf
W
ove
Nu
mb
or
Of
Asym
me
tric
M
od
o,k
FIG
.16
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
--.J o
1.00
0.9
5
0.9
0
...(
~0.85
o o -1
0>
.~
0.
80
~
(.)
:J
m 0.
75
0.70
--------
----=
___
.. I. 5
X-
~
__
-_
_ -
-:_
_
_
' -0
.:1
~_ _
----------.::----
.. ._
1.0-~
-/_
_~
.~~.
-.=
2.0
-' _~~
--"'=-
==-==-
=----
----:.~.r-
··:< 7
L
/_--
---
___
-.::.-
--rr
----
-.
/-/
--~=m'
-----
~ /
---
----/
_--
----
----
----
-l--
-=-=-=
------
-~·
/ ...---
--;!..
-----
-:.-.-
:~--:.
~~~
----
---r:
~----:
:-~:-~
-::--
----
-=-:
-:.-
--~ -
/'
/"
/' ,/
/ / i
------
------
-0----
------
~-
---
--,,.
...-'
s =
I. 0
, x
= 0
.5
/_
/
1.0
s=
0.5
,X=
0.5
2
.0
1.0
2
_0
Co
mm
on
P
ara
mo
ters
---------
06
5 r-
XA
= 0
-1
0,
r =
I. 5
q=
1.0
2 L
__
..
I ._
1. _
__
_
4 6
8 10
12
A
xia
l H
alf
Wov
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k
FIG
.17
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G
LO
AD
. .J
14
.....,
1.00
0.95
0.90
,.(
0.S
5
"0
o o -lO
.SO
0
>
C
.:.!
~ 0
.75
CD
0.7
0
06
5
s ~ 1
5, X
~ Hi
//1
---
----
----
---
-----
-.1 1----
--------
--------
----
----
I ___
______
_ _
---~f-
------
---
---
~~::::-::: -=-
--'=
':::'-
: -=--=:-~-
-----~
----
---
-----
---
----
---
-----;
05
_
__
__
__
_
O ;
.-5
= I.
,
,-1.
'0
2.0
..........
. -..........
.
----
----
-----. --
- ------
------
-------
--------
------
---~-
"-..
--------
..........
..
------
----
----
----
----
---
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
XA =
0.2
0,
r =
0.5
q
= 1
.0
2
-0
5 X
= 0:;
oj
\ 5
-.
, ~
1.0
2°-L
------
-~-~---
~---
....J
~-----
---
--,
14
------
----=
:r--
-12 4
6 S
Axia
l H
alf
W
av ~
N
um
be
r O
i A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k
FIG
.IS
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G
LO
AD
10
~
N
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
-<
..;
0.85
o o -'
C1>
c 0
.80
.:;
,: u :J
Q)
0.7
5
0.70
5 =
I. 5
, X
= 0
.5 -
1.0
2.0
-
--~-
-==-=~
~
----
-------
--------
--------
--------
------
---
---
--:::.
.-...:
-:::~.
...
'~I
----
__
-=:.::~:_-
--_~
~~_=
_-__ -
=-~_=__~
-=-=
/
----
,--.
--------
; . ---
-----
------._
.. _--
---------
----
-----
-------
----
~ --
--.,
---
S=1.
0,X=
0.O~
-1
1-----. _
_
1.0
2
.0
--------------
--
j-\
---
----
----
-~~
~ X
= 0~5 ~ -
.'---
---
.~
1.0
J
/'
2_
0--
Co
mm
on
Pa
ram
eto
rs
0.6
5r
XA
= 0
.20
, r
= 1.
0
q =
I. 0
I 2 L
__ 4
I I
8 10
_
__
__
_ .L
__
_
6 A
xia
l H
alf
W
ave
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
M
od
e,k
FIG
.19
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G
LO
AD
12
J 14
--J
()J
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
.< 0
.85
-'0
o o -.J 0>
0.8
0 c:
.JIC
o ::J
m
0.7
5
0.7
0
s= 1
.5, X
= 0.5
-1.
0 2
.0
-- ~-----~
-----
,. ---
------
----
---.
----
----
----
----
----
~~--
~~~~
_-
::.:c~
/ _--
~oc---
=O"=--
.=----
---.
:--~
----
--......
.. ---
----
.---
---=
.--
---
':::-:::-~
--.;:
/_
/--
c------,,-~
. -
--
--
/ ./
--
----
----
---:
:::-
---:::
:-..
/ ~-~
---
----
/ -.
..----
~-------~=
--
-~-
--' .
..---
----"'
~~
---
--..-
---
-~
1/'
,---
--------
-.--~.
------
----
--~ --";
;;;;::':
:~~~~c.:
-, ~
s=
1.0
X
=O
' ---
~.
--=o~'
:::--~
,.._
•
.0
--
-~-
/_
1
.0
:--
------
=
/
' 2
.0-
s=
0.5
,X=
0.5
r-
----
--/
~g~
----
-
j'
.
Com
mon
P
ara
me
ters
XA
= 0
.20
t r
= I.
5
0.65
r-q
= 1
.0
L I
_ L
_ --.L
__
__
_
1._
__
_
I
2 4
6 6
10
Axia
l H
alf
Wav
o N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
mo
tric
Mo
do
, k
FIG
.20
C
OM
PU
TE
D B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
I _
__
__
1 12
14
~
1.0
0
0.9
5
0.9
0
;( 0
.85
-0
c 0 -.J 01
0
.80
c x u ~
0.7
5
0.7
0 >
~.
0.6
5
x =
0.5
, r =
0.5
1.0
/.5
--------
. ----
---
----
----
----
--=
--
.......
----
---
----
']-=---
=----
------
---\
-----
----
---
-
----:-.
:]_1-'
---
--- --
.,,'"
-
",'"
X=
1.0
,r=
0.5
-1.
0
-----
--------
--------
-------
------------
-------
-~--
"'"
1.
5 --
----
----
----
'~
----_
_
1.0·
~o
~mon P
o r_
a m~
f()r
s ---
_ _
__
__
1.
5-
____
X
:2.C
I,r=
0.5
1 X
A-0
.05
,s-1
.0
--
-----
q =
1.0
-----
-----'"
----------
2 _
L-_
__
__
__
__
__
_ .~I _
__
_ _
_
__
__
L-
4 6
8 10
A
xia
l H
alf
Wov
e N
um
bo
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e.
k F
IG.2
1
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KLI
NG
LO
AD
12
14
....,
01
1.00
O.~;
::;
..
0.9
0
0.85
-<
-"0
o ~0.80
0>
c:
~ 0
.75
~-:>
m
0.7
0
0.6
5 >
-
x =
0.5
, r
= 0
.5 -
1.0
1.5
-----~
--_. =
~=-=--
-----=
-=-=-=
=-=---
----
---
----
----
----
----
----
---.-
-=c:
=. -
-:: ::
.= -
---=
-:_~ : :
:-=-.-:
_ -:-::-.
: =:::
-:, c =
= ~~
~ __ _
----
~-----
-------
-----
X=
I.O
,r=
0.5
1.
0 1.
5
----
----
1
X-2
.0,r
::0
.5 J
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
X A =
0.0
5 ,
s::
1.0
q::
1.0
1.0
-1
.5
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
'--_
__
__
--
-.1 _
_ _
__
_ 1 _
_
__
_ I
1 I
1 I
6 8
10
12
14
2 4 A
xia
l H
ulf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
dc,
k F
IG. 2
2
CO
M P
UT
ED
B
UC
KLI
NG
LO
AD
-..J 0)
A:
'1:J o
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
0.8
5
.3 0
.80
Ot
c: ~ 0
.75
;:
, m 0.
70
·0.6
5
Xa
O.5
,r=
0.5
1.
0 1.
5 ---
-----
-----
.=~-
-;f=
-=-~
-=--
---=
--=-
..::
:----
---__
_
~
-===-,
_._---
---_._.--
:--.--
-.
--=
=-
-.-.----
-.-..l
...._
--__
_ _
=--
---------
-------
-----
----
----
---------
----
----'
----
----
-X
= 1
.0,r
=0
.5
__
__
_ _
x
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
XA
= O
. 05
, s
= 1
.5
q =
1.0
2 4
6 8
10
Axi
al
Ha
lf W
ave
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
M
od
e,
k F
IG.2
3
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
12
14
"" ""
1.00
0.9
5
0.9
0
0.85
.-<
--,
:, c .3 0.
80
01
C
~ g
0.75
m
0.7
0
0.6
5
x = O.
5,
r =
O. 5
--
1.0
1.
5
----
----
----
----
----
----
-----
-----------------
-:U
----
---.
---
-X=
IO r
=0
.5
t ._.
____
__
. ,
----
---
-1
.0·
__
_ -------
1.5-
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
-----
--~ --
----
---
---.
::::
.-. ---
-... --
.------
----
-----
----------~--------
--------
----.
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
----.--
------
------
-----
XA
= 0.
05
(0.1
0,0
.20
),
s =
0.5
q
= 2
.0
2 4
6 8
10
Axia
l H
olf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
M
od
e, k
F
IG.2
4
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
12
14
......
Q)
-< ..
1.0
0r
i=0
.5,r
= 0
.5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
::Q
/ --
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-0
.95
0.9
0
0.8
5
--...:s
a zd
'C'?
--:
-=-=--
---_
_ _
-----.------
x = 1
.0, r
= 0
.5
1.0
1.
5
----
----
----
----
---
------------------------
---
------
= -=-=--
= =-=-
.:.-:.-:
::..-:=
:: :..--=
-:::-=--=
=.::.. -=
-..:. ::=
----
----
----
----
----
---
------
------
----
"1:J a o ..J
0.8
0
X=
2.0
,r=
0.5
1.
0 1.
5
o c:
.JIll
u 0
.75
::
)
CD
0.7
0
Com
mon
Pa
ram
ete
rs
X A=
0.0
5(0
.10
,0.2
0),
5=
1.0
0
.65
r
q =
2.0
(3.0
) 2 4
6 8
10
Axi
al
Ha
lf W
ave
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asy
mm
etr
ic M
od
e. k
F
IG.2
5
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
12
14
..., U)
..< " o
1.00
0.9
5
0.9
0
0.8
5
o ..J
0.8
0
at c oW g
0.7
5
en 0
.70
0.6
5
~: =~ -
=
= -
=-=-=.
=
=-=
-=-~=:--=-~=
----
----
-----
--~
----
----
----
---
-------
-------
-------
-------
----
----
X=
0.5
,r=
0.5
-
-------
--
1.0
X=
I.O
,r=
0.5
X
=2
.0,r
=0
.5r
----
----
1.5
Co
mm
on
Pa
ram
ete
rs
XA =
0.0
5 (
0.1
0,0
.20
),5
= 1.
5
q =
2.0
(3.0
) 2 4
6 8
10
Axia
l H
alf
Wo
ve
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
Mo
de
,k
FIG
. 2
6
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
12
14
Q) o
.-( " o
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
OB5
.3 0.
80
01
C
~ 0
.75
~
II)
0.7
0
0.65
"
----
X =
1.0
,r=
0.5
1.
0 1.
5
----
----
----
----
--------
-------
-----
---
-..:-=
=-=::
..::::..
---
-- -
---
--------------------
-------
----
----
x =
2.0
,r::
0.5
'"
1.0
',--
1.5
----
---
---
-------
] ~ommon P
ara
me
ters
-_
__
__
__
_
_
XA=
0.I
O,s
=0
.5
------
---
I 0
__
__
_--
q::
. --------
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Axia
l H
alf
W
ave
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asym
me
tric
Mo
de
.k
FIG
.27
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
CD
...c: -~
o o
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
...J
0.80
o c ~
~ 0
.75
III
0.70
x = 0
.5,
r =
0.5
1.
0 1.
5
-----------
-=-=
:--=
-=.::
::: =-
=-= : =
-:.: :: .
.:.:
-<H
::::
r .... -.-~==-=-=----
----
-
X =I
.O,r
=0
.5
1.0
1
.5
Com
mon
Pa
ram
ete
rs
XA =
0.1
0,
s =
1.0
----
----
----
----
x-2
.0,r
=0
.5
1.0
1.5
0.65~
q =
1.0
2 4
6 8
10
Axi
al
Ha
lf W
ave
Nu
mb
er
Of
Asy
mm
etr
ic M
od
e, k
F
IG.
28
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
----
----
-=--:::
:-.:.. -
::::-::
=--:::
-:::--=-
-=-=
---.
----
---
---------
12
14
Q)
N
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
0.8
5
~ .
"1:J o o ..J
0.80
co
c ~ g
0.75
m
0.70
------
----
---
--------
x =
0.5
, r=
0.5
1
.0
1.5
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
0.6
5 r
X A =
0.1
0,
s =
I. 5
q ..
1.0
----
----
---
----
=----
----
---
----
----
-----
----
----
--~
----
----
--:--~
------
-----f
----~-
----
-----_
--~
--~---
----
------
----
-----
-----
-----
----
1--_
_ _
---
J
-lO
r =
0.5
0
5
X'
-,
X' 2
.0",
.
~ _
__
__
__
__
_ L-_
__
__
__
__
_ ~I--------
I I
I I
I 4
6 8
10
12
14
2 A
xia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mod
e, k
F
IG.2
9
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
L
OA
D
CD
(J.I
.-<
A
'1:1 o
1.00
0.9
5
0.9
0
0.85
.3 0
.80
C
II c ~ 0
.75
~
m 0
.70
0.6
5
X=
0.5
,r=
0.5
1.
0 1.
5
----
--
-----
----
----
---
----
----
----
----
---
---
----
----
----
---
------
---- ----
--- -------
------------
------
----
----
----
----
-----
~~.---
----
----
----
.---
----
-----~:~r
j --
-----
------
~~---
X-I
.O,,
-O.5
-_
__
_ _
' 1
.0
• 1
.5
'---.
........
...... - -
--
----
1.5 1
C
omm
on P
o ro
me
te rs
• _
__
_ _
__
_
......
.--
-x =
0 2
0
s =
0.5
_
__
__
__
__
__
_
__
_
A
. ,
_ _
_ .::
...-==
:J;..-
-----~
q
= 1.
0 1
_ ~
2 4
6 8
10
12
14
Axia
l H
alf
Wov
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
de
. k
FIG
. 3
0
CO
MP
UT
ED
B
UC
KL
ING
LO
AD
Q)
~
.-<
't:J o
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
0.85
.3 0.
80
D
C
.Jttt.
~
0.75
CD
0.7
0
0.65
X=
0.5
,r=
0.5
/.
0
1.5
x = I.
0,
r =
0.5
1.
0 /.
5
Com
mon
P
ara
me
ters
X
A =
0.2
0,
s =
I. 0
q=1.
0
2
-------
-------
----
---
---.::::
....:::.
----
----
:.-:
::-----
------
----
----
----
----
----
----
------
--------
--
------
--
4 6
8 10
12
14
A
xia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
de
, k
FIG
.31
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G L
OA
D
Q)
Ut
1.00
0.95
0.9
0
0.85
A
: -~
o o ..J
0.8
0
o c oX
g 0
.75
m
0.7
0
0.6
5
X=
0.5
,r=
0.5
1.
0 1.
5
----
----
----
---
---"
?--=
-=--
----
----
----
----
-~-
-----
----
~------
----
----
----
----
-----
-----
-----
---.
---
----
-~
----
----.
... --
----
----
--
--:y-
-------
-------
-----
-----
---
----
----
-----
--0
5
__
__
X-2
.0,r
-.
__
__
__
__
_ X
= 1
.0,r
= 0.
5
Co
mm
on
P
ara
me
ters
XA
= 0
.20
, s
= 1
.5
q= 1
.0
2 4
6 8
10
Axia
l H
alf
Wav
e N
um
be
r O
f A
sym
me
tric
Mo
de
,k
FIG
.32
C
OM
PU
TE
D
BU
CK
LIN
G
LO
AD
12
14
CD
0')