the effect of state and local buffering mechanisms on household food security in nongloo...
DESCRIPTION
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012 Jul;43(4):1042-52. Household food security and buffering mechanisms in Thai and non-Thai households in Nong Loo Sub-district, Sangkhla Buri, Thailand. Cho MM1, Knowles J, Atwood S.TRANSCRIPT
Dr. May Myat Cho2nd International Conference and Exhibition on
Nutrition Science and Therapy.
What is food security?
• Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to enough safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy lifestyle (World Food Summit, 1996).
2
Factors influencing food security
3
Food Availability
Access to food
Buffering Mechanisms
Psychological feeling for food
-worry about running out of food
-worry about income- Worry that the child wont have
enough food
Food Security
4
What are the buffering mechanisms?
Buffering Mechanisms
Background on Thailand’s agriculture and it’s food security 1• Thailand- an
agricultural country• Effect of rapid
urbanization and industrialization reduced the farming area in Thailand with rapid deforestation
• Changing pattern of farming in Thailand
5
Background on Thailand’s agriculture and it’s food security 2Land degradation and changing pattern of
farming led to decrease crop yield for household food which cause the household food insecure (Viboon, 2009).
reduced in income had a decrease in access to health service and food provision
Household food security in urban poor in Thailand - only 44.2 percent had food security (Piaseu N and Mitchell P, 2004)
6
Study contextNongloo sub-district, Sangkla Buri
390 Km from Bangkokmountainous areaone of the three sub-districts in Sangkla Burithe town location - the main route of illegal
migration to larger cities in Thailand as well as major route for deporting migrants back
7
Study PurposeThe purpose of the study is to demonstrate
the prevalence of food insecurity and the association between food insecurity and buffering mechanisms
8
MethodologyResearch Design
cross-sectional study of household food security and the impact of buffering mechanisms on household food security
Sampling ProcedureVillages were selected by Probability
Proportional to Size methodHouseholds are selected randomly
Site of Studyin Nongloo sub-district, Sangkhla Buri, Thailand
9
Methodology• Instruments
– Main instrument for the research was structured interview (quantitative data collection)• Section I • Raedimer-Cornell food insecurity items• Section II• 2nd section of the interview dealt with awareness of
state and local buffering mechanism
– Qualitative data collection by interviewing with key informants (semi-structured open ended qualitative questionnaire)
10
Methodology• Data Analysis
– Data were coded and entered accurately in the computer and cleaned, verified in the field day by day after collecting data by using SPSS (16.0 version)
– Descriptive statistics using frequencies and percentages
– Analytic statistics using Chi-square and logistic regression for analyzing prevalence and correlations
– Qualitative Data– analysis of qualitative data by coding responses and
using a manual analysis method11
Results Prevalence of food insecurity
the prevalence of household food insecurity in Nongloo sub-district was 75.8 percent (p<0.001)
individual food insecurity was 75.35 percent (p<0.001) and the prevalence of child food insecurity was 75.28 percent (p<0.001)
HH food insecurity -60.8 percent for Thai and 95.6 percent for non-Thai population
12
Knowledge of presence of buffering mechanisms
% of people
who have
knowledge
80
67
32
13
Percent of Thai and non-Thai citizens who have access to the programs
Thai Non-Thai
No access (%) Access (%) No access (%) Access (%)
Access to community kitchen 100 0 100 0
Access to food aid 90 10 87.9 12.1
Access to specific food
subsidies
96.7 3.3 100 0
Access to Loan program 94.2 5.8 94.5 5.5
Access to food stamp/voucher 100 0 100 0
Access to food for work 95.8 4.2 96.7 3.3
Access to saving program 92.5 7.5 94.5 5.5
Access to community shop 95 5 98.9 1.1
Access to 30 Baht health care 45.8 54.2 63.7 36.3
14
Correlates of household food insecurity
OR P value 95%CI
Lack of access to food aid 0.487 0.342 0.111-2.149
Lack of access to specific food subsidies 0.160 0.250 0.007-3.620
Lack of access to Loan program 0.505 0.557 0.052-4.944
Lack of access to food for work 1.433 0.801 0.088-23.380
Lack of access to saving program 2.044 0.461 0.306-13.641
Lack of access to community shop 0 0.999 0.000-.
Lack of access to 30 Baht health care 0.547 0.207 0.214-1.396
Nationality 22.67 0.000 7.010-73.307
Knowledge of food related programs 2.332 0.103 0.842-6.462
Knowledge of health care program 0.922 0.877 0.331-2.568
15
Perception on food security status and food and health care programs by key informants
Food security – an important issue, non-Thai are more vulnerable
Landownership Food programs – Pattanarak, TBBC, ARC,
Food donation Education on agricultural skillsEnhance food production by demonstration
No food and agriculture policy targeted for non-Thai population
16
Perception on food security status and food and health care programs by key informants
Health care programs by different organizations such as ARC, Pattanarak, small NGOs
Access is determined by presence of Thai card
17
Discussion and Conclusion• High prevalence of food insecurity overall and
non-Thai population has a higher prevalence than Thai population
food insecurity in non-Thai (96%) was higher because of lack of access to land, protection of forest area mobility of migrant population (60% of migrants)Agricultural skills (attitude of non-Thai)
No statistical association between household food insecurity and buffering mechanisms could be the following reasons:
18
Discussion and ConclusionFactors influencing Food insecurity
according to the key informants
19
Poor Knowledge on Food/Health
Care Program
Land Ownership
Household Food
Insecurity
Language barrier
between the provider and
the beneficiary
Nationality/
Migrant Status
Shortage of human resource
in informatio
n circulatio
n
NGOs
Thank You