the effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...nagaraj, 1988; laughlin & french,...

22
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 157 (1992) 115-136 © 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers BV. All rights reserved 0022-0981/92/$05.00 115 JEMBE 01741 The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and development of early life stage Florida stone crabs Menippe mercenaria (Say) Susan D. Brown:', Theresa M. Bert"', Wendy A. Tweedale a, Joseph J. Torres b and William J. Lindberg c "FlorMa Marine Research Institute. St Petersburg. Florida, USA " hDepartment of Marine Science, University of South Florida. St Petersburg, Florida. USA: ':Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of FlorMa. Gainesville. Florida, USA (Received 5 September 1991" revision received 22 November 1991; accepted 3 December 1991) Abstract: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and growth of early life stage Menippe mercenaria (Say) were tested by rearing larvae and small juveniles (~ l0 mm CW) in factorial tempera- ture-salinity arrays (larvae: 20-35 °C [5 °C increments], 10-40%o [10Yooincrements]; juveniles: 5-35 °C [5 °C increments], 10-40%o [5%0increments]). The highest proportion of larvae survived in water of 30 ° C, 30%0; juvenile survival was 100°~, in water ranging from 15 to 25 °C and from 25 to 40%0. The distribution of this species both latitudinally and seaward may be determined by temperature and salinity tolerance limits of early stages. Both temperature and salinity affected the survival of early zoeal stages (Z 1-3). Salinity effects decreased during late zoeai stages (Z4-Z5) and then increased in the megalopal and juvenile stages. The decrease in the effect of salinity on survival at zoeal stage four suggests that osmoregulatory ability begins at this stage. The occurrence of a supernumerary zoeal stage (Z6)was not influenced by temperature or salinity and did not affect survival. Both larval developmental rates and frequency of molting in juveniles accelerated with increasing temperature but were not influenced by salinity. The observed effects of temperature on molting would promote rapid growth when water temperatures are warm, but would delay this physiologically stressful event when temperatures are cool and marginal for survival. The lower optimal temperature for survival of juveniles is probably an adaptation brought about by timing of the major reproductive season. Key words: Menippe mercenaria; Salinity; Stone crab; Survival; Temperature INTRODUCTION Temperature and salinity are important environmental factors that influence the survival and growth of marine invertebrates (Gunter, 1957; Kinne, 1970, 1971). In many species, the ranges of temperature and salinity over which an organism can survive increase throughout ontogeny to the adult stage but later decrease when the adult becomes senescent (Kinne, 1970, 1971). In addition, temperature and salinity ranges Correspondence address: S.D. Brown, Florida Marine Research Institute, 100 8th Avenue Southeast, St Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 157 (1992) 115-136 © 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers BV. All rights reserved 0022-0981/92/$05.00

115

JEMBE 01741

The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and development of early life stage Florida stone crabs Menippe

mercenaria (Say)

Susan D. Brown:', Theresa M. Bert"', Wendy A. Tweedale a, Joseph J. Torres b and William J. Lindberg c

"FlorMa Marine Research Institute. St Petersburg. Florida, USA " hDepartment of Marine Science, University of South Florida. St Petersburg, Florida. USA: ':Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of

FlorMa. Gainesville. Florida, USA

(Received 5 September 1991" revision received 22 November 1991; accepted 3 December 1991)

Abstract: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and growth of early life stage Menippe mercenaria (Say) were tested by rearing larvae and small juveniles (~ l0 mm CW) in factorial tempera- ture-salinity arrays (larvae: 20-35 °C [5 °C increments], 10-40%o [10Yoo increments]; juveniles: 5-35 °C [5 °C increments], 10-40%o [5%0 increments]). The highest proportion of larvae survived in water of 30 ° C, 30%0; juvenile survival was 100°~, in water ranging from 15 to 25 °C and from 25 to 40%0. The distribution of this species both latitudinally and seaward may be determined by temperature and salinity tolerance limits of early stages. Both temperature and salinity affected the survival of early zoeal stages (Z 1-3). Salinity effects decreased during late zoeai stages (Z4-Z5) and then increased in the megalopal and juvenile stages. The decrease in the effect of salinity on survival at zoeal stage four suggests that osmoregulatory ability begins at this stage. The occurrence of a supernumerary zoeal stage (Z6)was not influenced by temperature or salinity and did not affect survival. Both larval developmental rates and frequency of molting in juveniles accelerated with increasing temperature but were not influenced by salinity. The observed effects of temperature on molting would promote rapid growth when water temperatures are warm, but would delay this physiologically stressful event when temperatures are cool and marginal for survival. The lower optimal temperature for survival of juveniles is probably an adaptation brought about by timing of the major reproductive season.

Key words: Menippe mercenaria; Salinity; Stone crab; Survival; Temperature

INTRODUCTION

Temperature and salinity are important environmental factors that influence the survival and growth of marine invertebrates (Gunter, 1957; Kinne, 1970, 1971). In many species, the ranges of temperature and salinity over which an organism can survive increase throughout ontogeny to the adult stage but later decrease when the adult becomes senescent (Kinne, 1970, 1971). In addition, temperature and salinity ranges

Correspondence address: S.D. Brown, Florida Marine Research Institute, 100 8th Avenue Southeast, St Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.

Page 2: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

116 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

suitable for survival of an organism are usually greater than those compatible with growth (Gunter, 1957; Kinne, 1970, 1971).

In nature, environmental factors such as temperature and salinity frequently interact to affect organisms in ways different from those observed when each factor varies alone. Experiments testing erganismal response to the combined effects of temperature and salinity are important because they more accurately reflect natural conditions than do single-factor experiments. Consequently, factorial stuaie~ examining the influence of temperature and salinity on survival and growth in marine invertebrates are numerous (e.g., Lough & Gonor, 1973; Tettelbach & Rhodes, 1981; Watts etal., 1982). Crustacean larvae are especially well suited to these types of studies because they grow quickly and can be reared in large numbers (see, e.g., Costlow, 1967; Martens, 1985; Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop- ment are influenced primarily by temperature; salinity usually has a significant effect on survival but little or no effect on development.

The ecological and economic importance of the Florida stone crab Menippe mer-

centlria (Say) (Bert et al., 1978; Lindberg & Marshall, 1984) make this crustacean particularly relevant for study. M. mercenaria larvae normally pass through five (occa- sionally six)zoeal stages and one megalopal stage (Porter, 1960). Total developmental time from hatching to metanlorphosis in the laboratory ranges from 21 to 28 days, depending on holding conditions (Mootz & Epifanio, 1974). The mean size (carapace width [CW])of newly nletamorphosed juveniles is 2.2 ram; estimated mean intermolt period lbr postsettlement juveniles (~< 10ram CW) is 36days (SD = 20) (W.A. Tweedale, unpubl, data).

Previous studies do not provide a clear interpretation of temperature-salinity effects on the survival and growth of M. mercemtria throughout early ontogeny. Although other researchers have studied the effects of these factors on survival and development of M. melz'eoaria larvae (Porter, 1960; Ong & Costlow, 1970; Field, 1989), their results were based on data fi'om larvae hatched from only one crab and thus did not consider the potential for intraspecific variation in response to the experimental conditions. In addition, the taxonomic classification of larvae used by Porter (1960) and Ong & Costiow (1970) is confused by the recent division of M. mercenaria into two species (M. mercemtria, restricted, and M. adimt [Williams & Felder, 1986]) and the identifi- cation ofzones of hybridization between these two species (Bert, 1986; Bert & Harrison, 1988). Finally, Porter (1960) did not control temperature closely in his work, and Ong & Costlow (1970) did not present statistical tests for comparison among treatments. Information on the effects of temperature and salinity on postsettlement juvenile M. melz'enaria is even more scarce. Savage & McMahan (1968)recorded growth rates of juvenile M. mercemtria ( 1.4-33.3 mm CW) but did not control either temperature or salinity. Bender (1971) reared juveniles (<30 mm CW) from a hybrid zone in a temperature-salinity array, but his sample sizes were small and results inconclusive.

An understanding of the combined effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and development rate of early life stage M. mercenaria is essential for interpreting the

Page 3: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 117

influence of these environmental factors on the settlement and distribution patterns of this species. We addressed this need by conducting laboratory experiments in which both larval and postsettlement juvenile M. mercenaria were reared in factorial arrays of temperature and salinity. Our results provide important insight into changes in organismal response to these environmental factors throughout early ontogeny and the influence of those changes on various aspects of the biology and population ecology of M. mercenaria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Larvae

12 female M. mercenaria were collected from Tampa Bay, Florida (June-September 1988), and held in laboratory aquaria in artificial seawater (Instant Ocean) maintained at ~ 27 ° C, 30-32°00. Larvae from nine of these females were hatched from eggs that the females had spawned in the field (Group I larvae); larvae from three of the females were hatched from eggs that the females had spawned while in the aquaria (Group II larvae). The larval broods were reared in various factorial arrays of water temperature (5 ° C increments) and salinity ( 10'j'6o increments) as follows: seven broods, 20 to 35 ° C, 10 to 40 °~oo," four broods, 20 to 30 ° C, 10 to 40%o; one brood, 20 to 35 o C, 20 to 40%0. Tenltperature-salinity combinations were selected to encompass the range of conditions larvae would experience in nature.

Within 12 h of hatching, larvae were transferred from the aquarium in which they had hatched to a 1000-ml beaker filled with a 1 : 1 mixture of water from the aquarium and freshly mixed artificial seawater (30°;,o). Artemia sp. nauplii, hatched from de- encapsulated cysts (Sorgeloos et al., 1980), were added as a food source. After approxi- mately one hour, larvae were transferred from the collecting beaker to covered 250-ml culture bowls containing ~ 150 ml of artificial seawater. We evenly divided 45 larvae from each brood (replicate) into three bowls (subsamples) for each temperature-salinity combination (treatment). Bowls were randomly arranged in temperature-controlled water baths lighted by full-spectrum fluorescent aquarium bulbs on a 12:12 light:dark cycle. Larvae were acclimated to experimental salinities by adjusting salinity 5%0 at 2-h intervals. Larvae were added directly to bowls containing water maintained at 20, 25, or 30 °C; larvae to be reared in water of 35 °C were first placed in 30 °C water, acclimated to salinity, then gradually warmed to 35 °C. Acclimation rates for both temperature and salinity are comparable to those of other investigators or are more conservative (see, e.g., Ong & Costlow, 1970; Rabalais & Cameron, 1985; Field, 1989), and are necessarily rapid due to the short duration of the zoeal stages.

Throughout the acclimation and experimental periods, larvae were examined and transferred to clean water of the appropriate temperature and salinity each day, then

Page 4: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

118 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

fed Artemia nauplii (two to four Artemia per mi). Megalopae were placed in individual bowls to prevent cannibalism and were fed both Artemia nauplii and minced conch. The temperature of each water bath, the salinity of the water in each bowl, and the number of living larvae .'it each instar in each bowl were recorded daily. Zoeal stages one through six (Z 1-6) and the megalopal stage were identified using descriptions and drawings by Porter (1960). Unique characteristics identifying each zoeal stage (Brown, 1990) were used to expedite identification, t~aus minimizing handling time.

Juveniles

M. mercemtria juveniles measuring ~< 10 mm CW were collected from the fouling community on commercial stone crab traps in Tampa Bay during October 1989. Juveniles were held in a factorial array consisting of seven temperatures (5-35 °C, 5 °C increments) and seven salinities (10-40'~;,o, 5%0 increments). The number of crabs in each treatment varied from five to eight, and each individual was held separately in a 250-ml beaker containing 100-150 ml of seawater. Beakers were randomly arranged in both temperature-controlled water baths (20-35 °C treatments) and refrigerated incubators (5-15 -'C treatments). Juveniles were held at field temperature and salinity conditions (27 ~ C, 30000) until acclimation to each treatment was initiated. Temperature acclimation proceeded at a rate of 2 ° C per day and was structured so that crabs to be held at the various experimental temperatures arrived at the appropriate level on the same day. Salinity acclimation, conducted at a rate of 2%0 every 2-3 h, began the day after temperature acclimation concluded. Juveniles were held under the experimental conditions for 42 days. During both the acclimation and experimental periods, each juvenile was checked daily and water temperature, molting activity, and mortality were recorded. Every other day, crabs were ted minced conch; on the following day, the water in each beaker was changed and salinity was measured.

STATISTICAl. M ETHOL)S

Survival was analysed as zocal survival, larval survival, and stage-specific survival. For each treatment, zocai survival was calculated as the number of larvae surviving to the megalopai stage divided by the initial number of larvae in that treatment and larval survival was calculated as the number of larvae surviving to the first crab instar divided by the initial number of larvae in that treatment. Stage-specific survival, calculated for each stage in each treatment, was defined as the number of !~:'vae molting to a specific stage, divided into the number of larvae in that treatment molting to the following stage. Total survival of larvae did not differ significantly among subsamples for 99,°, o of the replicate-treatment combinations (n = 172); therefore, subsamples within each treat- ment were combined for all analyses.

Differences in Izlrval survival among all broods, and among broods in Groups I and II separately, were analysed using the R x C G test of independence (two-way G test; Sokal & Rohlf, 1981 ) on the combined data from the treatments common to all broods.

Page 5: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 119

Larval survival differed significantly (P < 0.001) among the 12 broods, with Groups I and II each forming homogeneous sets as determined by the simultaneous test proce- dure of frequencies (STP; Sokal & Rohlf, 1981). Larval survival did not differ among broods within either group and consequently, all analyses of survival data were per- formed separately on larvae pooled for Group I and for Group II.

The effects of temperature (T) and/or salinity (S) on zoeal, larval, and stage-specific survival (P) were analysed among treatments using a nonparametric log-linear model, hereafter referred to as the three-way G test (Sokal & Rohlf, 1981). This test serves the same function as a parametric two-way factorial ANOVA but treats the dependent factor as an independent factor. The three-way G test consists of several steps; the result of each step determines if the test should be continued to the next step. Because the three-way G test is a stepwise procedure, 0.025 was established as the significance level for each step of our analysis to give a final overall significance level of ~ 0.05. Step I tested for a three-factor interaction among T, S, and P. If the G value was significant, the three-way G test was stopped and two-way G tests were performed on the pairs of factors appropriate to our model (T x P, S x P) at each !evel of the third factor. Significance was determined using the sequential Bonfem~ :echnique (Rice, 1989), with 0.05 as the selected significance level. If step I was not significant, the three-way G test continued to step II, which in our model tested for two-factor interactions between T and P and between S and P. At step II, significant G values for both the interaction and the decrease in fit of the model (see Sokal & Rohlf, 1981) indicated that the tested factor (Tor S) affected P independently at all levels of the alternative factor, and the two-wa) G test was performed over pooled levels of the alternative factor (2 = 0.05). If the G value for an interaction differed in significance from the G value for the decrease in fit of the model, Freeman-Tukey deviates were examined. If a pattern in the deviates existed, orthogonal comparisons were made by grouping factor levels. If either, or both, of the two-factor interactions were significant, the three-way G test was stopped; if both two-factor interactions were not significant, the procedure con- tinued to step !11. In our calculations, step lli always produced a nonsignificant result establishing the complete independence of P from S and T, and the procedure eaded. At treatments where larvae survived to the megalopal stage or longer, differences in stage-specific survival among stages were examined using two-way G tests.

All significant two-way G tests were followed by the STP to identify where significant heterogeneity among treatments occurred. When both T and S had a significant effect on P, square-root-transformed survival data were fitted to a response-surface regres- sion. Because the regression is a prediction, isopleths may not reflect actual values; however, optimal values are reliable predictions ofthe T and S with the highest response.

The frequency of occurrence of Z6 was determined by dividing the number of larvae molting to Z6 by the total number of larvae that survived through Z5. Differences in frequency of occurrence of Z6 individuals among treatments as well as differences in stage-specific survival of Z6 larvae to megalopae and of those megalopae to first crab instars were analysed using the three-way G test. Survival to the megalopal stage and

Page 6: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

120 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

to the first crab instar were compared between Z5 larvae passing through Z6 and Z5 larvae not passing through Z6; data were analysed using the two-way G test at each treatment with a sample size >i 3 and over pooled treatments.

Development was analysed in several ways. Mean lengths of time were calculated for development through all zoeal stages (zoeal lifespan) and through all zoeal stages plus the megalopal stage (larval lifespan). The duration of a specific zoeal stage was calcu- lated for each subsample as the difference between the mean day of molting to that stage and the mean day of molting to the following stage. Duration of the megalopal stage was determined for individual megalopae as the number of days between molting to that stage and metamorphosis. Developmental rates did not differ significantly among the 12 broods of larvae for all treatments combined; therefore, data were not divided into Groups I and II for analyses of development. All developmental data were analysed u~ing the Kruskal-Wallis test (Sokal & Rohlf, 1981), followed by Dunn's approximation of Steel's rank sum test (Dunn, 1964) for Tand S separately. Only treatments with n > 3 were used in these analyses.

Juvenile survival (P) was defined as the proportion of crabs remaining alive at the end of the experiment. The effects of T and S on P and on experimental molt frequency (the proportion of juveniles molting during the experiment) were analysed using the same statistical procedures employed for the analyses of larval survival data. The effect of T on acclimation molt frequency (the proportion of juveniles molting during accli- mation) was analysed using the two-way G test followed by the STP. For treatments in which mortality was 100~o, differences in survival intervals (proportion of the experimental time during which each crab remained alive among treatments were determined using the two-way G test and the STP.

All KruskaI-Wailis tests and response-surface regressions were performed using the statistical analysis system (SAS) and PC-SAS software packages (SAS Institute, 1985). Original programs for calculation of G statistics were also created using SAS.

RESULTS

LARVAE

During the larval experiment, actual mean temperature and salinity for each treatment varied ~< 0.1 °C and ~< 0.8°~,o, respectively, from the established experimental values.

Survival

The highest zoeai survival (14.1~g) and the highest larval survival (12.6~o)were observed in Group II in water maintained at 30 °C, 30%0 (Fig. 1). At treatments where some larvae survived to the first crab instar, a significantly higher percentage of Group II larvae survived than did Group I larvae (P < 0.001). Neither temperature nor salinity had any significant effect on larval survival in Group I, probably because survival was very low. Temperature and salinity did significantly affect zoeal survival of both

Page 7: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 121

>

t , .

(Jr)

16

14

12

10

8

Group l

Group ll

20•30 25•20

t):i:iil!

~ ii:::)t 25130 2 5 / 4 0 30 /20 30130

Treatment (*C / %,~)

i~ ~ i

30140 35 /30

16

Group I 14 Group II

12

10

8

6

4

2

o ' 20 /30 25 /20

r ~ - i

: i f ; : 1

25130 25140

o ,

i / m I

3 0 / 2 0 3 0 / 3 0 3 0 / 4 0 35 /30

Treatment (*C/%,)

Fig. !. (A) Percentage of larvae surviving to megalopal stage (zoeal survival) in each temperature-salinity treatment in which total survival was > 0°J~, in at least one brood. (B) Percentage of larvae surviving to first crab instar (larval survival) in each temperature-salinity treatment in which total survival was > 0~o in at least oile brood. (A) Group I larvae, n = 5640. (B) Group II larvae, n = 1920. See text for definitions of

larval groups.

Groups I (temperature: P = 0.008; salinity: P < 0.001)and II (both factors: P < 0.001) and larval survival of Group II (both factors: P < 0.001). The significant effects of temperature reflected the presence of larvae surviving at some temperatures versus the near or complete absence of larvae surviving at the other temperatures. Zoeal and larval survival were highest at the salinity level of 30,~o0. Response-surface regressions for

Page 8: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

122 S.D. BROWN ETAL.

Group I zoeal survival and Group II larval 'mrvival did not fit the data well (Table I); the regression for zoeal survival of Group II predicted optimal levels at 28 ° C and 29%0.

For each larval group, stage-specific survival differed significantly among stages at each treatment tested (Group I: P < 0.005-0.001; Group II: P < 0.01-0.001). Stage- specific survival at the Z 1, Z5, and megalopal stages was generally lower than at other larval stages (Fig. 2). Response-surface regressions predicted optimal stage-specific survival at temperature and salinity values which varied little among larval stages with

o/ means of ~ 28 ° C and 31Joo. Nevertheless, temperature-salinity effects on stage-specific survival varied among stages and, for some stages, between larval groups (Table I).

At Z 1, tests for three-factor interactions among temperature, salinity, and stage- specific survival yielded significant G values for both larval groups (each group: P < 0.001). Temperature and salinity each had a significant effect on survival at every level of the alternative factor except at the 10~oo salinity level in Group I, where all larvae

TABI.I- I

Interactions between temperature (T), salinity (S), and survival (P) during early life stages as determined by G tests, and temperature and salinity conditions for optimal survival predicted by response-surface

regressions, j.2 = regression goodness.of-fit value. See text for definitions of larval groups.

Stage Interaction T( ° C) S(%o) r'-

Larva l group

Z o e a !

Group I T x S x P 28 30 0.85

Group I! T x S x P 27 31 0.91 Z o e a 2

G r o u p ! T x P, S x P 29 30 0.79

Group I! T x S x P ,9,9 30 c~ 92

Z o e a 3

G r o u p ! T x P - - -

G r o u p !! T x P , S x P 31 31 0.91 Z o e a 4

G r o u p ! T x P - - -

G r o u p I! T x P - - -

Z o e a 5

Group ! N o n e - - -

G r o u p I! N o n e - - - M e g a l o p a

Group ! N o n e - - -

G r o u p !! T x S × P 27 33 0.46 Z o e a "

Group I T x P, S x P 28 30 0.45

Group II T x P, S x P 28 29 0.74 Larva I'

Group I N o n e - - _

G r o u p i i T x P, S x P 27 29 0.42

Juveni le ~ T x P, S x P 23 32 0.75

"To ta l survival ofzoeae from hatching to megalopai stage, h Total survival of larvae from hatching through naetamorphosis to first crab instar. ~ M e a n size: 4.5 mm carapace width (SD = 1.6).

Page 9: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 123

100

80

60

40

20

0

G R O U P I G R O U P II

zoea 1

zoea 2

zoea 3

zoea 4

zoea 5

megalopa

i , I m;O i 10 30 40

20oc 100

80

60

40

20

0 m .

2O 30 40

m o

:P b,. :3

or)

r..1

( . I 4) o . U) I 4) 01 0

Or)

100

80

6n

40

20

100

80

6O

40

20

C

2O II

3O 4O

25 °C

30%

100

80

60

40

20

O"

100

40

' ! 2G

20 3G 40 [] I

I0

20 30 40

ii lli ii 20 30 40

100

80

60

40

20

O" 10 210 30

35 °C 100

80

6O

40

2O

2 0 !

4O I0

Solinity I%o)

t i 20 30 4O

Fig. 2. Percentage of larvae in each larval group surviving throu=., each stage (stage-specific survival) for each temperature-salinity treatment in which more than three larvae survived beyond zoeal stage three. See text for definition of larval groups. Ranges of sample sizes were as follows: Group I - Z1,210-405; Z2, 8-125; Z3, 8-109; Z4, 4-80; Z5, 7-66; M, 6-17; Group II - ZI, 75-135; Z2, 12-84; Z3, 9-72; Z4,

5-57: Z5, 7-45; M, 4-24.

died (Table II). At intermediate-to-high salinities (20-40%0), survival in both larval groups was usually significantly lower at more extreme temperatures (20, 35 °C)than at intermediate temperatures (25, 30 ° C). At every temperature level, the proportion of

Page 10: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

124 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

T,xm n~ 11

Homogeneous sets of temperature-salinity treatments for stage-specific survival of zoeal stage one. (A) Temperature groupings at specific salinity levels. (B) Salinity groupings at specific temperature levels. Treatments are ordered, left to right, from lowest to highest percentage of larvae surviving (shown in parentheses). Underlined groups of treatments did not have significantly different proportions of larvae surviving as determined by R x CG test of independence and simultaneous test procedure. See text for

definitions of larval groups.

A: Temperature (°C) groupings

Group I" 10%o 2(] (0) 20°,,0 35 (0) 30%,, 35 L8) 40%0 23) (0)

Group lih IO%o 20 20%0 35 30%° 35 40%° 35

. . . . . . . .

B:

Group 1" 20 :C !0 CO) 25: C IA~ (0) 30 :C 10 (0) 35 :C 10 O3

Group IP' 20: C 25 :C

30: C 35 :C

25 (0) 30 (0) 35 (0) 20 (3) 25 116) 30 (27) 2_0__(_11_2 25 (32) 30 (41) 35 (4) 25 (10) 30 (24)

(0) 25 C0) 35 C0) 30 (4) (6) 20 (9) 25 (51) 30 (50) (18} 30 (56) 20 (57) 25 (62)

_ ( 1 6 ) 20 (18) 30 (43) 25 (44)

Salinity (%0) groupings

40 (0) 20 (3) 30 ( l l ) 40 (10) 20 (16) 30 (32_3 40 (24) 20 (27) 30 (41) 20 (0__} 40 (4) 30 (8)

!0(0) __90 (9) 40 (18) 30 (57) I(_L(~ 40 (44) 20 (51) 30 (62)

l0 4(4) 40 (43) 20 (50) 30 (56) I0 (0) 20(6) 40 (16) 30 (18)

"n ranged 210-405 (?i = 352). ~' n ranged 75-135 (.~" = 12(]).

larvae surviving in both groups was highest in water of 30'!'oo and lowest (usually 0'~o) in water of 10°,,o.

A significant three-factor interaction among temperature, salinity, and Z2 survival existed for Group II larvae only (P = 0.007). In Group I, both temperature and salinity had significant two-factor effects on survival of larvae (each factor: P < 0.001); survival was significantly aigher in water maintained at 30 °C and at 30%o (Table Ill). In Group II, survival was high at these same temperature and salinity levels, but the effect of each factor generally decreased with increasing levels of the alternative factor.

Temperature had a significant independent effect on survival at Z3 in both larval groups (Group I: P - 0.003; Group if: P < 0.001); the proportions of larvae that survived in water of 25 and 30 °C were higher than the proportions of larvae that survived in water of 20 and 35 ~'C (Table IVA). In Group I, the G value for the interaction of salinity and survival was not significant; in Group II, the G value for the salinity × survival interaction was significant, but the G value for the decrease in fit of

Page 11: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 125

T..xlnl~ !I!

Homogeneous sets of temperature-salinity treatments for stage-specific survival at zoeal stage two. (A) Temperature groupings at specific salinity levels. (B) Salinity groupings at specific temperature levels. Treatments are ordered, left to right, from lowest to highest percentage of larvae surviving (shown in parentheses}. Underlined groups of treatments did not have significantly different proportions of larvae surviving as determined by R x CG test of independence and simultaneous test procedure. See text for

definitions of larval groups.

A:

Group i" Pooled 20 (14)

Group !I ~' 20".,o 2_0 t8) 30%° 20 0-6) 40",,o ~0._(0)

B:

Group P Pooled

Group I I a 20:C 25 :C 30: C I0 (0) 35 :C

Temperature (°C) groupings

35 (39) 25 (41) 30 (53)

35 (25) 25 (80) 30 (81) 35 (59) 30 (84) 25 (86) 35 (43) 25 (56) 30 (63)

Salinity (%o) groupings

20 (36) 40, (37) 30 (53)

40 10) 20 (8) 30 (26) 40 (56) 20 (80) 30 (86)

40 (63) 20 (81) 30 (84) 20 (25) 40 (43) 30 (59)

"n ranged 28-360 12 = 167}. h n ranged 8-84 12 = 47). ~ n ranged 144-348 (.~ = 223). d n ranged 4-84 (.~ = 44).

the model was nonsignificant. F reeman-Tukey deviates suggested that survival was

higher than expected in water of 30,',,,, (Table iVB). Orthogonal comparisons revealed

a significant differe, ce (P = 0.014) between survival in 30%0 water and in 20 and 40%0

water combined.

At later zoeal stages (Z4 and Z5), the only effect of temperature or salinity on survival

was a significant interaction between temperature and survival at Z4 (Group I:

P = 0.015; Group II' P = 0.004). At this stage, the percentage of larvae that survived

in water maintained at 30 °C was significantly higher than the percentage of larvae that

survived in water maintained at other temperatures (Table VA). Although the G values

for independent effects of salinity on survival were not significant for either larval group,

the decrease in fit of the model due to dropping the salinity x Z5 survival term was

significant (P = 0.006) for Group I larvae. F reeman-Tukey deviates showed no definite

pattern (Table VB) and the G value for complete independence of salinity and survival

was not significant; therefore, we determined that no interaction existed.

Nineteen percent of Group I larvae (n = 147)and 21 e~, of Group II larvae (n = 171)

that survived to Z5 molted to Z6. In the treatments remaining, neither temperature nor

salinity significantly affected the fi'equency of occurrence of this additional zoeal stage

or the stage-specific survival either of Z6 larvae (Group I" n = 29; Group II: n = 36)

Page 12: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

126 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

T,xBI.i-IV

! teractions of temperature, salinity, and survival at zoeal stage three (Z3). See text for definition of larval groups. (A) Homogeneous sets of temperature treatments over pooled salinities for stage-specific survivai of Z3. Treatments are ordered, left to right, from lowest to highest percentage of larvae surviving (shown in parentheses). Underlined groups of treatments did not have significantly different proportions of larvae surviving, as determined by R x C G test of independence and simultaneous test procedure. (B) Freeman-Tukey deviates for the interaction of salinity and Z3 survival in Group II larvae. S, salinity

(%0), T, temperature (°C). Asterisks indicate a significantly large deviate.

A: Temperature (°C) groupings

Group !" 20 (0) 35 (64) 30 (69) 25 (70) Group II t, 20 (10) 35 (33) 25 (67) 30 (74)

B: S T Mortality Survival

20 20 0.279 0.000 25 0.088 0.021 30 1.494" -0.935 35 0.496 -0.010

30 20 0.034 0.221 25 - 1.853" 1.187" 30 - 1.086 0.660 35 - 0.548 0.506

40 20 2.207* - 1.876" 25 -0.469 0.361 35 0.631 -0.314

"n ranged 8-192 (.~ = 76). ~' n ranged 19,-160 (~ = 88).

to the megalopal stage or of those megalopae (Group I: n = 6; Group II: n = 18)to the

first crab instar. In addition, at in~dividual treatments with adequate sample sizes for

testing, stage-specific survival of k~xvae passing through Z6 to the megalopal stage and

of those megalopae to the first crab instar did not differ significantly from that of larvae

that did not pass through the Z6 stage during their ontogeny.

At the megalopai stage, Group I larvae remained in two treatments (30 °C, 25%o; 3 a ° ~ 30 o C, ,,/oo,. Predictably, no effect of temperature or salinity on survival was observed.

In Group 11, where larvae survived to the megalopal stage in all treatments except those o/ including 10/oo, there was a significant three-factor interaction (P = 0.004). Temperature

had a significant effect on survivall only at the 40%0 level (Table VIA), where a high

proportion of megalopae reared in water maintained at 25 °C survived through that

stage but all megalopac reared in 30 °C water died. Similarly, the significant effect that

salinity has at the 3() -( t empera ture level (Table VIB) reflected the difference in survival

of megalopae in x~ atcr of 30~oo vs. total mortality of megalopae in water of other salinities.

Developmental r,t,,

Teinperaturc, I~ut not salinity, significantly affected both zoeal (P < 0.001) and larval

(P = 0.001) lifc~pans. The lengths of time for larvae to develop to both the megalopal

Page 13: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 127

TABLE V

Interactions of temperature, salinity, and survival in late-stage zoeae (Z4 and ZS). See text for definition of larval groups. CA) Homogeneous sets of temperature treatments over pooled salinities for stage-specific survival of Z4. Treatments are ordered, left to right, from lowest to highest percentage of larvae surviving (shown in parentheses). Underlined groups of treatments did not have significantly different proportions of larvae surviving, as determined by the R x C G test of independence and simultaneous test procedure. (B) Freeman-Tukey deviates for the interaction of salinity and Z5 survival in Group II larvae. $, salinity

(%o), T, temperature (°C). Asterisks indicate a significantly large deviate.

A: Temperature ( o C) groupings

Group I" 35 (43) 25 (55) 30 (82) Group ll" 20 (50) 35 (50) 25 (64) 30 (84)

B: S T Mortality Survival

20 25 1. ! 60* - 1.440" 30 1.497" - 2.306* 35 0.000 0.000

30 25 - 0.954 !.080 30 - 1.278" 1.492" 35 0.047 0.298

40 25 0. ! 71 0.008 30 0.103 0.039 35 0.298 0.000

'° n ranged 7-133 (~ = 68). h n ranged 16-111 (.~ = 78).

TAm.l-: Vl

Homogeneous sets of temperature-salinity treatments for stage-specific survival of Group II megalopae. CA) Temperature groupings at specific salinity levels. (B) Salinity groupings at specific temperature levels. Treatments are ordered, left to right, from lowest to highest percentage of larvae surviving (shown in parentheses). Underlined groups of treatments did not have significantly different proportions of larvae surviving, as determined by R x CG test of independence and simultaneous test procedure. See text for

definitions of larval groups.

A: Temperature (°C) groupings"'

20%0 30 (0) 25 (20) 30%0 25 (30) 30 (71) 40°00 30 (0) 25 (80)

B: Salinity (%0) groupings"'

25 ~C 2_0 (20) 30 (30) 40 (80) 30 :C 20 (0) 40 (0) 30 (71)

"n ranged 4-24 (.~ = I i ).

Page 14: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

128 S. D, BROWN ET AL.

stage :rod to the first crab instar were significantly longer for larvae reared in water maintained at 25 °C than for larvae reared in water maintained at 30 °C (Fig. 3). Although some larvae also survived to the megalopal stage in both 20 and 35 °C water, sample sizes were low (less than four).

At each developmental stage, only temperature had a significant effect on the duration of that specific stage (ZI-4: P < 0.001; Z5: P = 0.033; megalopa: P = 0.002). The mean duration of each larval stage decreased with increasing temperature (Fig. 3); for most stages, mean development time of larvae reared in water of 30 and 35 °C was significantly shorter than that of larvae reared in water of 20 or 25 °C. Within each treatment tested, a significant difference in stage duration existed among stages (P < 0.05-0.001 ). At all temperatures, the durations of the first zoeal and megalopal stages were significantly longer than those of other stages (Fig. 3).

J U V E N I L E S

During the experiment on juveniles, actual mean temperature and salinity for each treatment varied ~<0.4 °C and ~< 1.4',~,;,,, respectively, from established experimental values. Initial mean CW of juveniles did not differ significantly among treatments (Kruskal-Wallis test); thus, size was not considered as a variable in the data analysis. The overall mean size of juveniles was 4.5 mm (SD = 1.6).

45

40

35

o 30

25 E I--- ~ 2O

o 15

~ 10

M J

~ . ~ ~%~

Mega lopa

, I Zoea 5

[ ~ Zoea 4

~i!~:i;! Zoea 3

t.'.'.'."J Zoea 2

Zoea 1

I

iiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

T e m p e r a t u r e PC)

Fig. 3. Mean durat ion (days) of each larval stage at each exper imental t empera ture with a sample size of

three or more. R:mges ~f .,,,: values and of sample sizes for t empera tures shown were as follows: Z i ,

sl~ = (}.1-0.3, n = 29-85; Z2, sl.: = 0.1-0.9, n = 11-66; Z3, st- = 0.2-1.0, n = 12-60; Z4, sE = 0.2-0.4,

n = 7-60; Z5, si.: = 0.4-1.5, n = 3-49; M, sl- = 0.4-1.5, n = 6-11.

20 25 3 0 35

Page 15: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 129

Survival

All juveniles survived throughout the experiment in water maintained at 15 °C, 25-40%0; 20 °C, 30-35%0; and 25 °C, 35~o~. No juveniles survived in any treatment combination that included 5 °C or 10%o or in treatments of 10 °C, !0-20%o. Tempera- ture and salinity each significantly affected survival of juveniles independently (each factor: P < 0.001). Survival was comparatively low in treatments with extreme tempera- tures (5, 35 °C) or low salinities (10, 15%o) (Table VIIA). The highest proportion of juveniles survived in water of 15 ° C, but moderate survival was also recorded over a broad range of temperatures. A response-surface regression predicted optimum survival at 23 °C, 32%0 (Table I).

At treatments with 100°o mortality, temperature and salinity each significantly affected survival interval (each factor: P < 0.001). Mean survival intervals of juveniles held in treatment combinations with both low temperatures (5-10 ° C) and low salinities (10-15,%o) were shorter than those of juveniles held at combinations with either low temperatures or low salinities and intermediate-to-high levels (15-35 ° C, 20-40%0) of the alternative factor (Fig. 4).

Molt .['requeno'

Juveniles < 10 mm CW have a mean estimated intermolt period that is 85% of the length of our experimental period (W. A. Tweedale, unpubl, data). Thus the proportion of juveniles that had molted during acclimation to a particular temperature could have inversely affected the proportion of juveniles that molted during the experiment at that temperature. In our study, the lowest and highest proportions of crabs molted during acclimation at 5 and 25 °C. respectively, and these proportions differed significantly

TAl}l.I- VII

Interactions of temperature and salinity with survival and molt frequency of small juveniles. (A) Homo- geneous sets of temperature treatments over pooled salinities and salinity treatments over pooled tempera- tures for survival. (B) Homogeneous sets of temperature treatments over pooled salinities for molt fie- quency. Treatments are ordered, left to right, from lowest to highest percentage of'juveniles surviving (shown in parentheses). Underlined groups of treatments did riot have significantly different proportions of juveniles

surviving, as determined by R × C G test of independence and simultaneous test procedure.

A: Temperature (°C) groupings"

5 (0) 35 (27) 10 (33) 30 (42) 20 (53) 25 (54) 15 (65)

A" Salinity (%0) groupings h

10 (0) 15 (16) 20 (32) 40 (50) 30 (55) 35 (59) 25 (63)

B: Temperature ( = C) groupings"

5 (0) 10 (0) 15 (9) 20 (23) 35 (30) 25 (32) 30 (44)

"n ranged 42-49 (.~ = 45). b n ranged 39-5 ! (~ = 45).

Page 16: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

60

i

a )

E I-- 60 i 0

,,ira e -

E • r- 40

X w 0 3O

i 0 >

20 , 4 -

i 0

> 10 i i . =2

(/7

0 10

i I

18

130 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

I I I I I I I I

20 25 30 35 40

Sa l in i ty (%o)

Temperature (°C)

I 5 mW! lO

2o

25

ao

I'--1 as

Fig. 4. Juvenile surviv,d interval (percentage of experimental time during which crabs lived) for temperature-salinity treatments in which all juveniles died prior to completion of experiment. Sample size

ranged from five to eight.

from one another (P = 0.037). In contrast to what might be expected, these temperatures also had the respective lowest and highest proportions of crabs that molted during the experiment. Consequently, we reasoned that the differences among treatments in accli- ,nation molt frequency were due to temperature effects on molting during acclimation rather than to variability among thc experimental animals assigned to various treatments - i.e., that experimental effects of temperature on molting began during acclimation.

No juveniles moltcd at any temperature-salinity combination involving 5 or 10 °C, or 10,°~oo, or in temperature-salinity combinations of 15 °C, 15-25%o; 20 °C, 15-20%o; or 20 o C, 35%o. The highest percentage of crabs molting in a treatment (83 ~ ) was at 20 °C, 25.,°oo. The G values calculated in the tests for two-factor interactions were significant only for temperature vs. molting (P < 0.001). No juveniles molted at low water temperatures, whereas some juveniles did molt at moderately high water tempera- tures (25-35 °C) (Table VIIB).

DISCUSSION

LARVAL SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT TIME

In similar studies rearing crab larvae, variability in survival has been reported among larval broods hatched by different females of the same species (Costlow, 1967; Hartnoll

Page 17: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 131

& Mohamadeen, 1987). In our study, we found no significant differences in survival among broods of M. mercenaria larvae within Group I or II. On the other hand, the difference in survival between larvae hatched from field-spawned eggs and larvae hatched from laboratory-spawned eggs indicates that incubation conditions influence survival throughout ontogeny. Some factors that may cause differences in larval survival are: (1)variation in physical parameters during incubation; (2)different temperature- salinity histories of the females (Gomez Diaz, 1987); or (3)different amounts of handling leading to stress of the female, embryo, or larva. To obtain results representa- tive of an overall species response, factorial larval rearing experiments should account for egg incubation conditions as well as intraspecific variability.

Although total larval survival was low, sample sizes were statistically meaningful and allowed us to positively detect significant differences in survival among temperature- salinity combinations. Both factors significantly affected survival through metamorpho- sis, indicating that some conditions are more optimal for overall larval survival than are others. The temperature and salinity treatments with highest survival were similar at all larval stages, and response surface regressions predicted highest survival at ~ 28 ° C, 317oo. In fact, these levels are typical of hydrological conditions found in nearshore marine environments of the species range during the major portion of the reproductive season (e.g., Bert et al., 1986; T.M. Bert, unpubl, data; Caldwell, in press).

The geographic range of a species is determined by many factors, one of which may be tolerance limits of early life stages to environmental conditions. We were not able to define absolute temperature and salinity tolerance limits for survival; however, in the laboratory, temperature and salinity began to inhibit larval survival between 20 and 25 °C and between 10 and 20%0; survival also decreased rapidly between 30 and 35 °C. For this species, the decreased ability of larvae to tolerate low salinities may strongly influence the distribution of the species from nearshore to offshore. Likewise, larval temperature tolerances may be a factor in determining the northern limit of this range. M. mercenaria are found offCape Hatteras, North Carolina (Hay & Shore, 1918), where mean temperatures exceed 20 ° C from June through October, but are not found off Cape Charles, Virginia, where mean temperatures are > 20 °C only from July through Sep- tember and the mean high temperature is ~ 26 °C (National Weather Service, pers. comm.).

The magnitude of the effects of both temperature and salinity on survival diminished throughout zoeal development but increased again in megalopae. The decrease in salinity effects with advancing zoeal stage may be due to development ofosmoregulatory abilities. Adult M. mercenaria are believed to be osmoregulators (Karandeyeva & Silva Lee, 1967). Larvae of another xanthid crab, Rhithropanopeus harrisii, begin to osmo- regulate at the fourth (final) zoeal stage (Kalber & Costlow, 1966). If the onset of osmoregulation occurs at the same point in the development of these two species, salinity w~uld have a reduced influence on survival ofM. mercenaria at zoeal stages four and five. Temperature, on the other hand, directly influences metabolic rates and more strongly affects survival throughout development. The megalopal stage is a transitional

Page 18: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

132 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

stage between the zoeal and adult forms; the stress caused by changes in both phy- siology and morphology at this stage may result in an increased sensitivity of megalopae to environmental conditions.

Although survival was affected by both temperature and salinity, development rates were influenced by telnperature alone. In M. mercenatqa, the rate of development increased with increasing temperature until a plateau was approached at 30-35 °C, suggesting that larvae are developing at about the maximum rate possible and a further increase in temperature would not produce any significant increase in development rate. The presence of temperature effects and the absence of salinity effects on development is common among brachyuran larvae (e.g., Costlow, 1967 [Callineetes sapidus]; Scotto, 1979 [M. m,d(frons]; Laughlin & French, 1989b [Rhithropanopeus harrisii]). Salinity may alter development in some way (e.g., influencing morphogenesis) but it does not alter molting rates. In nature, development rates would be influenced mainly when tempera- tures are changing: spring and fall. In spring, increased development time may be advantageous if later, more sensitive molts (zoea five to megalopa, megalopa to first crab instar) are delayed until conditions are closer to optimum levels. In fall, however, temperatures are decreasing and increased development time would be a disadvantage.

Survival and development rate differed not only among temperatures and salinities but also arnong the various larval stages. The first zoeal and megalopal stages exhibited low stage-specific survival and long development time, and stage-specific survival was also low at zoeai stage five. The high mortality seen at the first zoeal ~tage may be natural mortality due to the death of larvae with low fitness. High mortality at the first zoeal stage has been reported for other species of xanthid crabs (Knudsen, 1960). The fifth zoeal and megalopal stages are critical because each is followed by a metamorphic molt. Other brachyuran crabs, such as Cancer magister (Sulkin & McKeen, 1989) and several Calitbrnia xanthids (Knudsen, 1960), also have low survival rates at transitional stages. The duration of the megalopai stage was exceptionally long at all temperatures and salinities and may have been an artifact of laboratory conditions. Studies have suggested that duration of the megalopal stage depends on detection of favorable settlement conditions, particularly substratum (e.g., Christy, 1989). Likewise, duration of the megalopal stage in our experiment may have been prolonged due to a lack of a suitable settling surface, which, in turn, could have contributed to the comparatively high stage-specific mortality.

,~ 1/5 of all larvae reared through zoeal stage five passed through a sixth zoeal stage. The occurrence of this supernumerary stage did not vary with temperature or salinity in our study or in the studies of other researchers (Porter, 1960; Ong & Costlow, 1970); however, in contrast to these studies, our results and those of Field (1989) showed that larval survival was not affected by the occurrence of a sixth stage. The absence of either a temperature-salinity effect or a decrease in stage-specific survival suggests that the occurrence of this extra stage is not a response to temperature- or salinity-induced stress. The incorporation of this zoeal stage into the ontogeny of M. mercenaria may be an asynchrony of molting and morphogenesis or the product of the evolutionary history of the species.

Page 19: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 133

JUVENILE SURVIVAL AND MOLT FREQUENCY

As was seen in larvae, both temperature and salinity affected survival of postsettle- ment M. mercenaria juveniles. These juveniles can tolerate a wide range of temperatures and salinities that covers virtually all conditions they would experience in their natural environment. This broad tolerance might be expected because juveniles remain < 10 mm carapace width for up to a year (W. A. Tweedale, unpubl, data). In areas where M. mercenaria juveniles have been collected, annual temperatures range from 8 °C (National Weather Service, pers. comm.) to 38 °C (Ginsburg, 1956) and salinities range from 5°oo (Voss et al., 1969) to 40°~o (Bert et al., 1986). Lower-limit thresholds for survival were obvious between 5 and 10 °C, and between 10 and 15%o. Combinations of low temperatures and low salinities had a more immediate negative effect on survival than did combinations of either low temperatures and moderate salinities or moderate temperatures and low salinities. The more rapid lethal effect at low levels of both factors indicates that temperature and salinity act synergistically to affect juvenile survival. Upper-limit thresholds for both factors were beyond the levels tested and also beyond those levels that juvenile stone crabs would normally encounter in nature.

The range of temperature over which juveniles molted was narrower than the range of temperature over which they survived. Cessation of molting at low temperatures may be caused by inhibition of muscular activity. Neuromuscular performance of adult M. mercenaria is inhibited by short-term exposure to low temperature (8 ° C) (Blundon, 1989), and movement of juvenile stone crabs is virtually nonexistent in water tempera- tures of < 15 °C (S. D. Brown, pers. obs.). As with larval development rates, frequency of molting increased with temperature to a maximum value above which no significant increase was evident. Similar to our findings for M. mercenaria, intermolt periods of many other juvenile brachyuran crabs, such as Carcinus maenas (Klein Breteler, 1975) and Callinectes sapidus (Cadman & Weinstein, 1988), are not affected by salinity. The absence of a salinity effect on molting suggests that the influence of salinity on survival is not associated with molting inhibition.

The optimum temperature for survival of juveniles was considerably lower than that for larvae. If the major reproductive season is determined by environmental require- ments for embryonic and larval survival, then juveniles may have adapted to the relatively low temperatures present soon after high numbers of larvae settle. From our data, we can predict that most ovigerous females should spawn and hatch eggs in summer, when larvae would have optimal conditions for survival and development. Based on estimates of development time, high numbers of postsettlement juveniles would initially be found ,~ 6 wk after spawning (2 wk egg incubation [Brown, 1990], 4 wk larval development); thus, peak settlement would occur in late summer to autumn, when temperatures are decreasing but still high enough to permit molting of juveniles. In fact, the highest numbers ofovigerous females have been captured in the field during late summer and the highest relative abundances of small juveniles have been found in fall (Bert et al., 1986). Thus, the comparatively low optimal temperatures for survival

Page 20: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

134 S.D. BROWN ET AL.

of postsettlement M. mercenaria are probably an adaptation brought about by timing of the major reproductive season.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank R. Hochberg and H. Cruz-Lopez for field and laboratory assistance. We also express appreciation to W. Arnold, T. Hopkins, K. McCarthy, T. Perkins, and E. VanVleet for reading various versions of the manuscript. This research constituted the basis for an M.Sc. thesis in the Department of Marine Science at the University of South Florida (S. D. Brown) and was funded by grants from the Department of Commerce, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (P.L. 88- 309 [ Project 2-408-R) and P.L. 99-659 [ Project 2-IJ-2 ]) and from the Florida Sea Grant College Program (Project R/LR-B-24), and by the Florida Department of Natural Resources, Florida Marine Research Institute.

REFERENCES

Bender, E.S., 1971. Studies of the life history ofthe stone crab, Menippe mercenaria (Say), in the Cedar Key area. M.Sc. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 110 pp.

Bert, T.M., 1986. Speciation in western Atlantic stone crabs (genus Menippe): the role of geological processes and climatic events in the formation and distribution of species. Mar. BioL, Vol. 93, pp. 157-170.

Bert, T.M. & R.G. Harrison, 1988. Hybridization in western Atlantic stone crabs (genus Menippe): evolutionary history and ecological context influence species interactions. Evdution, Vol. 42, pp. 528-544.

Bert, T. M., J. Tilmant, J. Dodrili & G.E. Davis, 1986. Aspects of the population dynamics and biology of the stone crab (Menippe mercenaria) in Everglades and Biscayne National Parks as determined by trapping. S. Fla. Res. Cent. Rep., SFRC-86/04, 77 pp.

Bert, T. M.. R. E. Warner & L. D. Kessler, 1978. The biology and Florida fishery of the stone crab, Menippe mercemaria (Say), with emphasis on southwest Florida. Fla. Sea Grant Tech. Pap., No. 9, 82 pp.

Blundon, J.A., 1989. Effects of temperature and thermal history on neuromuscular properties of two crustacean species. J. Comp. Physiol. B, Vol. 158, pp. 689-696.

Brown, S. D., 1990. Temperature and salinity effects on survival and development of early stage stone crabs, Menippe mercenaria (Say, 1818). M.Sc. thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 107 pp.

Cadman, L.R. & M.P. Weinstein, 1988. Effects of temperature and salinity on the growth of laboratory- reared juvenile blue crabs Callinectes sapidus Rathbun. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., Vol. 121, pp. 193-207.

Caldwcll, M.A., in press. Aspects of the biology of the stone crab, Menippe mercenaria (Say) from South Carolina, with comments on the South Carolina stone crab fishery. In, Proceedings ofa Symposhlm on Stone Crab (gem,s Menippe) Biology and Fisheries, edited by T.M. Bert, Fla. Mar. Res. Publ., No. 50.

Christy, J. H., 1989. Rapid development ofmegalopae of the fiddler crab Ucapugilator reared over sediment: implications for models of larval recruitment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., Vol. 57, pp. 259-265.

Costlow, Jr., J. D., 1967. The effect of salinity and temperature on survival and metamorphosis ofmegalops of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Helgoi. Wiss. Meeresunters., Vol. 15, pp. 84-97.

Dunn, O.J., 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, Vol. 6, pp. 241-252. Field, C.J., 1989. Effects of salinity and temperature on survival and development time of the larvae of stone

crabs, klenippe mercenaria (Say, 1818) and Menippe adina Williams and Felder, 1986, (Decapoda : Brachyura : Xanthidae). M.Sc. thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 157 pp.

Ginsburg, R.N., 1956. Environmental relationships of grain size and constituent particles in some south Florida carbonate sediments. Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol., Vol. 40, pp. 2384-2427.

Page 21: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

TEMPERATURE-SALINITY EFFECTS ON EARLY STAGE STONE CRABS 135

Gomez Diaz, G., 1987. Influence of the parental history on the larval development of Macrobra'chium rosenbergii (de Man). lilt. J. Invert. Reprod. Devel., Vol. 12, pp. 45-56.

Gunter, G., 1957. Temperature. Geol. Soc. Am. Mere., Vol. 67, pp. 159-184. Hartnoll, R.G. & H. Mohamedeen, 1987. Laboratory growth ofthe larvae of six British crabs. J. Exp. Mar.

Biol. Ecol., Vol. 107, pp. 155-170. Hay, W. P. & C.A. Shore, 1918. The decapod crustaceans of Beaufort, N.C., and the surrounding region.

Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 35, pp. 369-475. Kalber, F.A. & J. D. Costlow, Jr., 1966. The ontogeny of osmoregulation and its neurosecretory control in

the decapod crustacean, Rhithropanopeus harrisii (Gould). Am. Zool., Vol. 6, pp. 221-229. Karandeyeva, O.G. & A. Silva Lee, 1967. Intensity of respiration and osmoregulation of the commercial

crab Menippe mercenaria (Say) from Cuban coastal waters. Esmdios, Vol. 2, pp. 5-19. Kinne, O., 1970. Temperature. In, Marine ecology. Vol. I, Part I, edited by O. Kinne, Wiley-Interscience, New

York, pp. 321-514. Kinne, O., 1971. Salinity. In, Marine ecology. Vol. I, Part2, edited by O. Kinne, Wiley-lnterscience, New

York, pp. 683-995. Klein Breteler, W.C.M., 1975. Laboratory experiments on the influence of environmental factors on the

frequency ofmoulting and the increase in size at moulting of juvenile shore crabs, Carcinus maenas. Neth. J. Sea Res., Vol. 9, pp. 100-120.

Knudsen, J.W., 1960. Reproduction, life history, and larval ecology of the California Xanthidae, the pebble crabs. Pac. Sci., Vol. 14, pp. 3-17.

Laughlin, R. B. & W. French, 1989a. Differences in responses to factorial combinations of temperature and salinity by zoeae from two geographically isolated populations of the mud crab Rhithropanopeus harri:~ii. Mar. Biol., Vol. 102, pp. 387-395.

Laughlin, R.B. & W. French, 1989b. Interactions between temperature and salinity during brooding on subsequent zoeal development ofthe mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii. Mar. Biol., Vol. 102, pp. 377-386.

Lindberg, W.J. & M.J. Marshall, 1984. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (South Florida), stone crab. FWS/OBS-82/l 1.21, 17 pp.

Lough, R.G. & J.J. Gonor, 1973. A response-surface approach to the combined effects of temperature and salinity on the larval development ofAdula cal(forniensis (Pelecypoda : Mytilidae). I. Survival and growth of three and fifteen-day old larvae. Mar. Biol., Vol. 22, pp. 241-250.

Martens, K., 1985. Effects of temperature and salinity on postembryonic growth in Mytilocypris henricae (Chapman) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). J. Crust. Biol., Vol. 5, pp. 258-272.

Mootz, C.A. & C.E. Epifanio, 1974. An energy budget for Menippe mercenaria larvae fed Artemia naupl~i. Biol. Bull., Vol. 146, pp. 44-55.

Nagaraj, M., 1988. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on the complete development of Eurytemora velox (Crustacea : Calanoidea). Mar. Biol., Vol. 99, pp. 353-358.

Ong, K.S. & J. D. Costlow, Jr., 1970. The effect of salinity and temperature on the larval development of the stone crab, Menippe mercenaria (Say), reared in the laboratory. Chesapeake Sci., Vol. 11, pp. 16-29.

Porter, H.J., 1960. Zoeal stages of the stone crab, Menippe mercenaria Say. Chesapeake Sci., Vol. 1i, pp. 168-177.

Rabalais, N.N. & J.M. Cameron, 1985. Physiological and morphological adaptations of adult Uca sub- cylindrica to semi-arid environments. Biol. Bull., Vol. 168, pp. 135-146.

Rice, W.R., 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, Vol. 43, pp. 223-225. SAS Institute, Inc., 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina,

956 pp. Savage, T. & M.R. McMahan, 1968. Growth of early juvenile stone crabs, Menippe mercenaria {Say, 1819).

Fla. Bd Conserv. Spec. Sci. Rep., No. 21, 17 pp. Scotto, L. E., 1979. Larval development of the Cuban stone crab, Menippe nodifrons (Brachyura, Xanthidae),

under laboratory conditions with notes on the status of the family Menippidae. Fish. Bull. U.S., Vol. 7'7, pp. 359-385.

Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometrv. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California, second edition, 859 pp.

Sorgeloos, P., E. Bossuyt, P. Lavens, P. L6ger, P. Vanhaecke & D. Versichele, 1980. The use of brine shrimp Artemia in crustacean hatcheries and nurseries. Artemia Reference Center, State University of Gent, Belgium, 44 pp.

Sulkin, S.D. & G.L. McKeen, 1989. Laboratory study of survival and duration of individual zoeal stages as a function of temperature in the brachyuran crab Cancer magister. Mar. Biol., Vol. 103, pp. 31-37.

Page 22: The effects of temperature and salinity on survival and ...Nagaraj, 1988; Laughlin & French, 1989a). Results indicate that survival and develop Results indicate that survival and develop-

136 S.D. BROWN ETAL.

Tettlebach, S.T. & E.W. Rhodes, 1981. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on embryos and larvae of the northern bay scallop Argopecten irradians irradians. Mar. Biol., Vol. 63, pp. 249-256.

Voss, G. L., F. M. Bayer, C. R. Robins, M. Gomon & E.T. LaRoe, 1969. The marine ecology of the Biscayne National Monument. A report to the National Park Service, Dept. Inter. by the Univ. Miami, RSMAS, Miami, Florida.

Watts, S.A., R.E. Scheibling, A.G. Marsh & J. B. McClintock, 1982. Effect of temperature and salinity on larval development of sibling species ofEchinaster (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) and their hybrids. Biol. Bull., Vol. 163, pp. 348-354.

Williams, A.B. & D.L. Felder, 1986. Analysis of stone crabs: Menippe mercenario (Say), restricted, and a previously unrecognized species described (Decapoda: Xanthidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., Vol. 99, pp. 517-543.