the endophyte-host interaction: a balanced antagonism?
TRANSCRIPT
1275
BARBARA SCHULZ1, ANNE-KATRIN RO$ MMERT1, ULRIKE DAMMANN1, HANS-JU$ RGEN AUST1
AND DIETER STRACK2
" Institut fuX r Mikrobiologie, Technische UniversitaX t Braunschweig, Spielmannstr. 7, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
# Institut fuX r Pflanzenbiochemie, Weinberg 3, D-06109 Halle (Saale), Germany
Since secondary metabolites are involved in fungal-host interactions, those of endophytes and their hosts were studied to try to
understand why endophytic infections remain symptomless. A screening of fungal isolates for biologically active secondary
metabolites (antibacterial, antifungal, herbicidal) showed that the proportion of endophytic isolates that produced herbicidally active
substances was three times that of the soil isolates and twice that of the phytopathogenic fungi. As markers for the plant defence
reaction, the concentrations of certain phenolic metabolites were chosen. Those that differed in concentration were higher in the
roots of plants infected with an endophyte than in those infected with a pathogen. The results presented here were regarded
together with previous studies on other aspects of the plant defence response using dual cultures of plant host calli and endophytes,
and of cell suspension cultures following endophytic as compared to pathogenic elicitation. The following hypothesis was
developed : both the pathogen-host and the endophyte-host interactions involve constant mutual antagonisms at least in part based
on the secondary metabolites the partners produce. Whereas the pathogen-host interaction is imbalanced and results in disease, that
of the endophyte and its host is a balanced antagonism.
Fungal endophytes infect their hosts without causing visible
disease symptoms and have been isolated from almost every
host thus far studied (Petrini, 1991 ; Schulz et al., 1993 ; Schulz
et al., 1998). In our investigations we have concentrated on the
non-clavicipitaceous endophytes. These endophytes primarily
belong to the Ascomycetes and the related mitosporic fungi
(Bills, 1996). A limited amount of cytological work has been
done showing that the infections of these endophytes in host
plants may be inter- or intracellular and are often localized in
single cells (Stone, 1988 ; Suske & Acker, 1989 ; Cabral, Stone
& Carroll, 1993). Additionally, there have been several reports
that endophytic fungi sporulate after death of the host tissue,
i.e. essentially as saprotrophs (e.g. Stone, 1987), but there is
also some evidence that they may be weak pathogens (Kehr,
1992 ; Kowalski & Kehr, 1992). Carroll (1988) postulated that
certain endophytes enter into mutualistic relationships with
their hosts. Supporting this hypothesis, Wulf (1990) found
that the endophyte Diplodina acerina was apparently involved
in death of the gall wasp in leaves of Acer pseudoplatanus. Thus,
the status ‘ endophyte ’ describes an asymptomatic infection at
one moment without specifying the role of the fungus in the
host, nor its development at a later period (Petrini, 1991 ;
Schulz et al., 1998).
Although it has long been known that fungal secondary
metabolites are crucial to the pathogenicity of many fungi
(Harborne, 1993 ; Agrios, 1997), only little experimental work
has been done to study the role of secondary metabolites in
the endophyte-host interaction. Investigations have primarily
concentrated on isolating secondary metabolites and charac-
terizing their biological activity and the potential significance
of this activity for the host. Whereas, in the interactions of the
clavicipitaceous endophytes with their hosts, the mutualistic
role of alkaloids in conferring resistance to herbivory has been
well studied (Leuchtmann, 1992), there have been no reports
on the role these or other metabolites may play in the fungal-
plant interaction. Not only in the endophyte-host symbioses
of clavicipitaceous fungi, but also in those of the non-
clavicipitaceous endophytes with their hosts, secondary
metabolites may be a contribution of the endophytic partner
to a mutualistic relationship. For example, endophytic fungi
from conifer needles were found to produce metabolites toxic
to the spruce budworm (Calhoun et al., 1992). Endophytic
isolates of Pezicula were shown to produce fungicidally active
metabolites that are toxic to pathogens of their hosts (Schulz
et al., 1995).
Additionally, there have been only few investigations on
the physiological mechanisms of the endophyte-host inter-
action. A knowledge of these mechanisms is, however, a
prerequisite to understanding how the fungal endophyte is
able to grow within the plant host without causing
macroscopically visible disease symptoms. Cabral et al. (1993)
showed that there is indeed a host defence response to
Mycol. Res. 103 (10) : 1275–1283 (1999) Printed in the United Kingdom
The endophyte-host interaction: a balanced antagonism?
Endophyte-host interaction : a balanced antagonism? 1276
endophytic infection. They observed callose formation in
individual cells following infection of Juncus spp. with the
endophytes Stagnospora innumerosa and Drechslera sp. Sieber et
al. (1991) found that endophytic Melanconium spp. synthesize
highly specialized enzymes which may be relevant for the
penetration of the cuticular layers of the host. Several research
groups have investigated the growth responses of host calli
and endophytes in dual culture (Sieber, Sieber-Canavesi &
Dorworth, 1990 ; Hendry, Boddy & Lonsdale, 1993 ; Peters et
al., 1998a). As yet, however, there are only few reports on the
metabolic interactions involved (Peters, Dammeyer & Schulz,
1998b ; Schulz et al., 1998).
Our goal is to understand the nature of the endophyte-host
interactions of the non-clavicipitaceous fungal endophytes as
compared to those of other plant-fungal interactions, e.g.
mutualistic and antagonistic symbioses of mycorrhiza and
pathogens. In this paper we report our initial results on
contributions of fungal endophytes and pathogens and their
plant hosts to these interactions, concentrating on the
secondary metabolites the partners produce. These include : (i)
a screening for biologically active secondary metabolites of
more than 4000 fungal isolates from both soils and plants of
very diverse habitats ; (ii) comparative analyses of the
concentrations of phenolic metabolites of axenically grown
seedlings whose roots were infected with an endophyte with
those produced following infection with a pathogen. The two
plant-fungal systems studied used the larch (Larix decidua
Mill.) which was infected with either the endophyte
Cryptosporiopsis sp. or the pathogen Heterobasidion annosum
(Fr.) Bref. [Syn. Fomes annosus (Fr.) Cooke] and barley (Hordeum
vulgare L.), infected with the endophyte Fusarium sp. or the
pathogen Drechslera sp.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Isolation and screening of fungal isolates. Approximately
1250 endophytic strains were obtained from a wide range of
deciduous and coniferous trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants
(details from authors) growing in Lower Saxony, Germany.
Surface sterilization of leaf, stem and root segments was done
with ethanol and sodium hypochlorite, the concentrations of
the latter and the times of sterilization being varied according
to the consistency of the tissue to be sterilized. The
effectiveness of the surface sterilization was checked by
making an imprint of the sterilized tissue on an antibacterial
malt-peptone-yeast extract agar (MPYA) medium (Schulz et
al., 1993). When the surface sterilization was successful, no
fungal colonies developed on the medium used for the
imprint. The sterilized segments were then cultivated on
antibacterial agar and the mycelia isolated as they emerged
from the sterilized tissue (Schulz et al., 1993). Some isolates of
ubiquitous genera (e.g. Penicillium, Cladosporium, Trichoderma,
Aspergillus) were not maintained in culture.
For a comparison, we also screened approx. 2100 soil
isolates, 150 epiphytes and 500 plant pathogenic strains, 250
of these from macerated tissues. The soils were from temperate
climates and from extreme habitats (Germany, Canada,
Greenland, U.S.A., Turkey, Tenerife, Egypt, Israel, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Mali, Philippines, Borneo, Thailand, China, Japan, and
Antarctica). Soil was suspended in sterile tap water with one
drop of Tween 80, agitated and then plated onto antibiotic
MPYA. Isolates were separately cultivated as they appeared
on MPY agar medium. Again, most isolates of ubiquitous
genera were not maintained in culture. Plant pathogenic
strains were isolated following surface sterilization as above
for the endophytic strains, but from diseased plant tissue of
Brassica napus L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Hordeum vulgare L.,
Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nym., Phaseolus vulgaris L., Solanum
tuberosum L., Triticum aestivum L. and Zea mays L. Epiphytes
were isolated before surface sterilization onto antibacterial
MPYA from some of the same plants from which endophytes
had been obtained.
A screening for fungicidal, antibacterial and herbicidal
metabolites was conducted as described previously (Schulz et
al., 1995) with all of the isolates using four fungal (Eurotium
repens Corda, Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl., Mycotypha micro-
spora Fenner, Ustilago violacea (Pers.) Roussel), two bacterial
(Escherichia coli (Mig.) Castell. & Chambers and Bacillus
megaterium de Bary), one algal (Chlorella fusca Shih Krauss) and
two phanerogam (Lepidium sativum L. and Lemna minor L.) test
organisms. Evaluation had shown that the results from
screening with the alga and phanerogams could be grouped
together as ‘herbicidal ’ activity (Schulz, unpublished).
Fungal isolates of larch and barley. The endophyte of larch
used in these studies (Cryptosporiopsis sp.) was isolated
following surface sterilization from the fine roots of a 27 yr
old tree growing in a mixed forest of predominantly beech,
larch and fir near Evessen, Lower Saxony, Germany in May,
1994. We chose an isolate of this genus because Crypto-
sporiopsis, along with its teleomorph Pezicula sp., are the
most commonly isolated endophytic genera of the European
larch (Kowalski, 1982 ; Kowalski & Kehr, 1992). Heterobasidion
annosum (Deutsche Stammsammlung fu$ r Mikroorganismen,
Braunschweig, 2728) was chosen as the pathogen since it is
the most problematic root parasite of conifers in Germany
(Butin, 1989).
Endophytic fungi were isolated from healthy roots of
barley following surface sterilization. The barley plants (spring
barley, cv. Salome) had been cultivated for 6–8 wk as
described by Maier et al. (1995). The Fusarium sp. and
Drechslera sp. were chosen from these isolates following tests
for pathogenicity (Schulz et al., 1998).
Axenic culture and inoculation of host seedlings. Larch seeds
were pre-soaked (500 seeds in 500 ml sterile tap water,
changed daily) for 4 d on a rotary shaker at 120 rpm and 4 °C.
On the fourth day of pre-soaking the antibiotic ClaforanTM
(Ch.-B. L588, Hoechst, Germany) was added to a final
concentration of 60 mg l−". Following surface sterilization, the
seeds were plated for germination on 5% (w}v) biomalt agar
(Vitaborn, Hameln, Germany) and cultured at 20° with a
photoperiod of 16 h, light (PAR: 200 µE m−# s−", Philips TLD
32W}84HF, Netherlands). After approx. 2 wk, sterile plants
that had developed needles and roots were transplanted into
sterilized plastic growth pots (height 108 mm; PhytaconTM,
Sigma P-4928, Deisenhofen, Germany) containing 100 ml
Seramis (Effem GmbH, Verden, Aller, Germany) as an
Barbara Schulz and others 1277
(a)80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inhi
biti
ng s
trai
ns (
%)
Soil
Plant
All inhibitions Fungicide Herbicide
Soil
Plant
(b)80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inhi
biti
ng s
trai
ns (
%)
Soil Endophytic Pathogenic Epithytic
Isolates with herbicidal activity
Fig. 1. Antifungal, herbidical and antibacterial activities of approx.
1900 fungal plant and 2100 fungal soil isolates, grown on solid media
and sprayed with a test organism (see text). (a) All inhibitions of
bacterial, fungal and plant test organisms ; fungicidal¯ inhibition of
the fungal test organisms ; herbicidal¯ inhibition of the plant test
organisms ; (b) algal}herbicidal activity of soil and plant isolates, the
latter according to source (approx. 1250 endophytic, 500 phyto-
pathogenic and 150 epiphytic fungal isolates).
expanded clay substrate and 40 ml modified Melin-Norkrans
(MMN) medium (Kottke et al., 1987). The seedlings were
then cultivated in a growth chamber (Weiss, Reiskirchen,
Germany) for 3 mo at 20}16° (day}night) with a photoperiod
of 16 h and light intensity of 100 µE m−# s−". At an age of
3 mo the larch roots were inoculated with Cryptosporiopsis sp.
or H. annosum by axenically placing a 4¬4 mm segment of
mycelial culture (30 d, grown on 2% w}v biomalt agar
medium) 1 cm deep into the expanded clay substrate
immediately adjacent to the root. Five pots of four plants were
inoculated for each time of harvest (0, 8, 16 and 32 dpi) and
each fungal isolate. The same number of uninoculated plants
served as controls, resulting in a total of 240 plants.
The barley seeds were surface sterilized (Schulz et al., 1998)
and transplanted into Phytacon growth pots at the age of
5–7 d. Inoculation of the plant roots occurred parallel to
transplantation (Schulz et al., 1998) with the Fusarium sp. or
Drechslera sp. For each of the five times of harvest (0, 7, 14, 21
and 28 dpi), five pots of four plants were inoculated for
pathogen and endophyte, five uninoculated pots of four plants
serving as controls and resulting in a total of 300 plants.
Harvest, extraction of sterile plants and determination of
phenolic components. At 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 days growth and
colouring of the plants were evaluated and at each time of
harvest the success of the infections was ascertained by
reisolation following surface sterilization of a 1 cm segment of
each of the roots included in a sample (four or five plants).
Microscopic examination of the roots served as additional
verification of infection. Longitudinal and cross sections
(20 µm) of the roots were made using a cryo-microtome
(Reichert-Jung, Nußloch, Germany) and stained in trypan
blue-lactoglycerin for 15 h (Brundett, 1984) or for 30 s in
0±1% aniline blue in lactoglycerin (lactate, glycerin, aqua dest.,
v}v}v, 1 :1 :1) and viewed in lactoglycerin (Zeiss Axioscope,
Go$ ttingen, Germany). The remains of the roots were frozen in
liquid nitrogen and temporarily stored at ®20° pending
lyophilization (1–2 h at ®70°, two days in a Christ Alpha
1-4, LDC-1, Osterode, Germany) and then stored at room
temperature in closed vesicles. As controls, mycelial cultures
of the fungi (larch grown on MMN and barley on MS
(Murashige & Skooge, 1962)) were frozen and lyophilized
according to the same procedure to assure that the metabolites
that were to be determined with HPLC were not of fungal
origin. The assays for soluble phenolics, cell wall-bound
products and proanthocyanidins as well as the HPLC analyses
were as previously described (Maier et al., 1995 ; Weiss et al.,
1997).
RESULTS
Fungal secondary metabolites. In our screening for antifungal,
antibacterial and algicidal}herbicidal metabolites, we tested
approx. 4000 isolates from plants and soils. About the same
proportion of soil and plant isolates inhibited at least one of
the test organisms (Fig. 1), 70% and 78%, respectively.
Regarding the herbicidal}algicidal and antifungal activities
separately, we again found that approx. the same proportion
of the plant and soil isolates, nearly 50% of all fungal isolates,
inhibited one of the fungal test organisms (Fig. 1). Only 18%
of the fungal isolates from soils showed herbicidal activity, but
52% of those from plants did.
In order to ascertain whether all plant isolates or only those
with a particular ecological niche produce a high proportion of
herbicidal metabolites, we examined the isolates from plants
according to their sources. The endophytes, with 57% of the
strains inhibiting at least one of the test organisms for
algal}herbicidal activity, were responsible for the high
proportion of activity among the plant isolates. In contrast,
only 27% of the phytopathogens and 25% of the epiphytes
produced herbicidally active secondary metabolites (Fig. 1).
Endophytic and pathogenic infections. Of the inoculated
roots, almost 100% were infected by the endophytes or
pathogens, as shown by incubation following surface
sterilization of the inoculated roots. Noninfected roots were
excluded from further experiments. The endophytic infections
of the roots of larch and barley resulted in neither growth
inhibition nor disease symptoms, whereas infections with the
pathogens led to both disease symptoms and diminished
growth of the seedlings (Figs 2, 3). This discrepancy in
Endophyte-host interaction : a balanced antagonism? 1278
(a)45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Sho
ot le
ngth
(cm
)
(b)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Rel
ativ
e di
seas
e se
veri
ty
Days post inoculation
ControlFusarium sp. (endophyte)Drechslera sp. (pathogen)
5
90
0 7 14 21 28
Fig. 2. Growth and disease symptoms of barley following inoculation
of the roots of axenically grown seedlings (1 wk) with Fusarium or
Drechslera. Evaluation of the relative disease symptoms including
necroses and chloroses in % of total leaf area. n¯ 20.
development of symptoms between endophytic and patho-
genic infections occurred in spite of the fact that both
endophytes and pathogens extensively colonized the roots of
the two hosts, both inter- and intracellularly (Fig. 4).
Plant secondary metabolites. Phenolic metabolites are
considered to be involved in the plant defense reaction. To
investigate whether their concentrations differ as a result of
endophytic and pathogenic infections, we measured the
concentrations of soluble and cell wall bound phenolic
metabolites of the roots following infection.
In the roots of larch the phenolic metabolites (phenyl-
propanoids) that could be identified were catechin, epicatechin,
maltol glucoside, 4-hydroxybenzoate, 4-hydroxybenzoyl-
glucose, vanillin, ferulate, tetrahydroxystilbene and a quercitin
glycoside. None of these metabolites were found in the fungal
controls. Whereas there were no significant differences in the
concentrations of most metabolites in the axenically grown
control plants and in those infected with one of the two fungal
isolates, the concentrations of oligomeric proanthocyanidins
increased 440% in the roots infected with Cryptosporiopsis sp.
in comparison to the controls (Fig. 5). In contrast, in those
infected with H. annosum the concentration decreased to
almost zero 16 d following infection.
The phenylpropanoids detected in roots of barley were
ferulic acid, 4-coumaric acid, N-4-coumaroylputrescine, N-4-
(a)1·5
0·0
Incr
ease
of
shoo
t len
gth
(cm
)
(b)
3
2
1
0
Rel
ativ
e di
seas
e se
veri
ty
Days post inoculation
ControlCryptosporiopsis sp. (endophyte)H. annosum (pathogen)
4
0 2 4 8 16
1·0
0·5
32
Fig. 3. Growth and disease symptoms of larch following inoculation
of the roots of axenically grown seedlings (3 mo) with Crypto-
sporiopsis sp. or Heterobasidion annosum. Relative disease severity,
based on the degree of chlorosis : 0¯ no chlorosis, 4¯ brown
needles. No necrosis developed on needles of the seedlings. n¯ 20.
coumaroylagmatine, N-feruloylputrescine and N-feruloyl-
agmatine. None of these metabolites was found in the fungal
controls. The soluble metabolites N-4-coumaroylputrescine
and N-4-coumaroylagmatine could not be detected in barley
roots at the time of inoculation (Fig. 6). Commencing at the
time of inoculation (0 d), however, during the subsequent
28 d the concentrations of agmatine increased in the roots of
the control plants and in those infected with the endophytic
Fusarium, to approx. 0±7 µmol g−" .. and 0±65 µmol g−"
.., respectively, those of putrescine increasing to 7±7 and
7±0, respectively. In contrast, during the same period these
substances were not detectable in roots of the seedlings
infected with Drechslera sp. It is important to note that
between 0 and 7 d after inoculation, the roots infected with
Drechslera sp. had not yet developed disease symptoms. The
concentrations of the cell wall-bound metabolites 4-coumaric
acid and ferulic acid increased less in barley plants infected
with the Drechslera during the 28 d following infection than in
the controls, or in those roots infected with the endophyte.
Whereas the concentration of 4-coumaric acid increased from
zero to 6±8 µmol g−" .. in roots infected with the endophyte
and in the controls, the concentration of this cell wall-bound
metabolite only increased to 2±1 µmol g−" .. in the plants
infected with the pathogen (Fig. 7). The concentration of
ferulic acid increased from approx. 12 to 21 µmol g−" root
Barbara Schulz and others 1279
Fig. 4. Inter- and intracellular colonization (arrows) of larch with Cryptosporiopsis sp. (a) and H. annosum (b), and of barley with Fusarium
sp. (c) and Drechslera sp. (d ). Scale bars¯ 20 µm.
15
10
5
0
Days post inoculation
ControlCryptosporiopsis sp. (endophyte)H. annosum (pathogen)
0 8 16 32
Sol
uble
pro
anth
ocya
nidi
ns(µ
mol
cya
nidi
n ch
lori
de e
quiv
alen
ts g
–1
..)
Fig. 5. Concentration of soluble proanthocyanidins in the roots of
larch seedlings grown axenically for 3 mo before inoculation with
endophyte or pathogen and cultured in expanded clay in MMN-
medium at 20° with a photoperiod of 16 h (PAR: 100 µE m−# s−").
n¯ 4 samples of two plants each.
.. in the controls and in the plants infected with the
endophyte, the increase occurring more rapidly in roots
infected with Fusarium sp. than in the controls (Fig. 7). In the
roots colonized by the pathogen, the concentration of ferulic
acid only increased from 11±5 to 16 µmol g−" .. during the
28 d following infection.
DISCUSSION
Summarizing our results concerning the metabolic interactions
of endophyte and host, we have found that :
(1) In our screening for biologically active secondary
metabolites, a significantly higher proportion of endophytic
isolates produced metabolites that are herbicidally active than
those isolated from other sources.
2. In the cases in which the concentrations of phenolic
metabolites differed between roots infected with an endophyte
and those infected with a pathogen, the concentrations were
higher in the roots, infected with an endophyte.
Fungal metabolites. Previously, it was thought that fungal
secondary metabolites might only be waste products of
primary metabolism (Za$ hner, 1977). In recent years it has
become more and more obvious that, as is the case for plant
secondary metabolites (Harborne, 1993), these metabolites
may play an ecological role, e.g. the host selective toxins of
phytopathogenic fungi, antifungal metabolites from myco-
parasitic fungi, mycotoxins that protect fungal reproductive
Endophyte-host interaction : a balanced antagonism? 1280
(a)12
6
N-4
-cou
mar
oylp
utre
scin
e (µ
mol
g–1
.
.)
(b)0·8
0·2
Days post inoculation
ControlFusarium sp. (endophyte)Drechslera sp. (pathogen)
4
0 7 14
10
8
2
0
0·6
0·4
0·0
21 28
N-4
-cou
mar
oyla
gmat
ine
(µm
ol g
–1
..)
Fig. 6. Concentration of N-4-coumaroylagmatine and N-4-
coumaroylputrescine in the roots of barley seedlings grown axenically
for 1 wk before inoculation with endophyte or pathogen and
cultured in expanded clay in MS-medium at 20° with a photoperiod
of 16 h (PAR: 100 µE m−# s−"). n¯ 3 samples of five plants each.
structures from herbivory and those involved in competitive
or antagonistic interactions (Gloer, 1997). Nevertheless,
finding that fungal endophytes, in comparison to phyto-
pathogens and isolates from soils, have the highest
proportion of herbicidally active isolates was quite unexpected,
since by definition endophytic fungi cause no visible disease
symptoms in their hosts (Petrini, 1991). It had seemed more
plausible that phytopathogens would produce a high pro-
portion of herbicidally active metabolites.
It is not the case that the herbicidal activity of these strains
is due to one or more substances common to all of these
endophytic fungi. The structures of some of these secondary
metabolites have been determined and belong to very diverse
structural groups including : steroids (Krohn et al., 1992a),
imides (Krohn et al., 1992b), diterpenes (Ko$ nig et al., in press),
depsipeptides (K. Krohn, R. Bahramsari, H.-J. Aust, S. Draeger
& B. Schulz, unpublished), cytochalasines (Ko$ nig et al., in
press), biarylethers (Krohn et al., 1996), epoxydones and
xanthenes (K. Krohn, K. Beckmann, H. J. Aust, S. Draeger &
B. Schulz, unpublished), isocoumarines (Schulz et al., 1995 ;
Krohn et al., 1997b) and furofuranones (Krohn et al., 1994a).
There is also a previously unknown structural group, the
palmarumycins (Krohn et al., 1994b, c, 1997a, c). Not only the
culture extracts but also the pure substances are herbicidally
active : 31 of 33 of these metabolites inhibited at least one of
the test organisms for herbicidal activity (data not shown).
Finding that such a high proportion of the metabolites isolated
(a)
6
4-co
umar
ic a
cid
(µm
ol g
–1
..)
(b)25
10
Days post inoculation
ControlFusarium sp. (endophyte)Drechslera sp. (pathogen)
0 7 14
4
2
0
20
15
021 28
Feru
lic
acid
(µ
mol
g–1
.
.)
Fig. 7. Concentrations of 4-coumaric and ferulic acids in the roots of
barley seedlings grown axenically for 1 wk before inoculation with
endophyte or pathogen in expanded clay in MS-medium at 20° with
a photoperiod of 16 h (PAR: 100 µE m−# s−"). n¯ 3 samples of five
plants each.
from endophytes are herbicidally active not only suggests an
ecological role for these endophytic secondary metabolites,
but also supports Demain’s hypothesis that these substances
have a natural function. The multienzyme reaction sequences
of secondary metabolites would not be retained by fungi
without some beneficial effect for survival. Additionally, it has
been shown that both phytopathogenic and soil inhabiting
fungi produce biologically active secondary metabolites in
nature (Demain, 1980). Thus, it seems plausible that these
substances are synthesized at some stage in the endophytic
life cycle in vivo. Nevertheless, the question remains : why do
endophytic fungi synthesize such diverse metabolites which
are potentially toxic for their hosts ?
In order to understand the role of these metabolites in the
endophyte-host interaction, Peters et al. (1998a) investigated
a simplified system using dual cultures of plant host calli and
endophytes. It was found that not only in monoculture, but
also in dual culture, the endophytes excreted nonspecific
herbicidal metabolites causing necroses, growth inhibition and
death of the host calli. The host calli in turn excreted non-
specific antifungal metabolites. Thus, both the endophytes and
the plant host calli excreted metabolites toxic to their partners,
suggesting a mutual antagonism of host and endophytic
fungus.
Barbara Schulz and others 1281
Plant metabolites and defence reaction. The great extent
to which the endophytes Cryptosporiopsis sp. and Fusarium
sp. colonized the roots of their hosts was unexpected, since
infections of plant hosts by non-clavicipitaceous endophytes
have often been assumed to be localized (e.g. Stone et al.,
1994) and neither disease symptoms nor growth inhibition
had been observed. It should be borne in mind, however, that
only a limited amount of cytological work has been done on
these endophytic infections (Suske & Acker, 1989 ; Cabral et
al., 1993 ; Viret, Scheidegger & Petrini, 1993 ; Stone et al.,
1994), so that extended colonization may not be infrequent.
Additionally, the plants used in these experiments had been
cultured in a growth chamber under conditions which
undoubtedly influenced the predisposition of the plant hosts.
The phenolic metabolites found in the roots of larch had
been previously identified by Weiss et al. (1996) in mycorrhizal
larch roots. Mu$ nzenberger, Kottke & Oberwinkler (1995) had
found catechin, epicatechin, 4-hydroxybenzoyl-glucose, 4-
hydroxybenzoate and additionally picein in mycorrhizal fine
roots of larch. The phenylpropanoids found in the roots of
barley were those that had been determined by Peipp et al.
(1997). In uninoculated barley plants of the same age as those
investigated in these experiments, the authors also found an
increase in the concentrations of the hydroxycinnamic acid
amides N-4-coumaroylputrescine and N-4-coumaroylagmatine
during mycorrhization. At a later stage than measured in these
experiments, the authors found a decrease in the concentration
of these metabolites.
Since phenolic metabolites are generally toxic to micro-
organisms (Schlo$ sser, 1997), they presumably play this role in
the systems we studied. The proanthocyanidins have been
shown to function as preformed defence metabolites in their
hosts (Stafford, 1997 ; Schlo$ sser, 1997). For example, Jersch et
al. (1989) found that as long as proanthocyanidins are present
at a sufficiently high concentration in strawberries, Botrytis
cinerea remains in a quiescent state. When the strawberries
ripen and the concentration of proanthocyanidins decrease, B.
cinerea becomes pathogenic. Weiss et al. (1996), investigating
the interaction of larch with the ectomycorrhizal fungi
Boletinus cavipes and Suillus tridentinus, showed that
mycorrhization of larch roots resulted in elevated levels of
phenylpropanoids, including cell wall-bound ferulate. The
secondary metabolites accumulated in the central part of the
subapical cortex tissue and the endodermis. The authors
suggested that such metabolites may provide a barrier to
growth of the mycorrhizal fungi into the apical meristem and
stele, a situation which may also exist in the roots of the larch
we investigated that were infected with the endophyte
Cryptosporiopsis sp. Since proanthocyanidins are located in the
epidermis of Lotus pedunculatus (Pankhurst, Craig & Jones,
1979), they may also serve as a barrier to fungal penetration
in this host. The hydroxycinnamic acid amides studied in
barley may be precursors of antifungal substances, since the
agmatines are precursors of the hordatines, antifungal
metabolites of barley (Stoessl, 1966a, b).
The concentrations of most of the phenolic metabolites
determined in these studies did not differ between control
plants and those infected with endophyte or pathogen. In
those cases in which the concentrations of these metabolites
differed, however, they were higher in the endophyte infected
roots. The increase in phenolic metabolites found in
comparison to the controls following endophytic infection
(proanthocyanidins in larch, ferulic acid in barley) is at first
glance unexpected since the infections remained symptomless.
The higher concentrations of these phenolic defence meta-
bolites may have been due to continual elicitation by the
presence of the fungal endophytes, which the latter – if they
came into contact with them – apparently could tolerate.
When infected with a pathogen, in contrast to the controls,
the concentrations of these phenylpropanoids in the roots
either increased less (ferulic and coumaric acid in barley),
remained undectable as at the time of inoculation (hydroxy-
cinnamic acid amides in barley) or decreased (proantho-
cyanidins in larch) during the course of the experiment.
This is presumably related to the pathogen’s ability to
overcome the host’s defence reaction and cause disease, e.g.
by suppression of synthesis or degradation of the metabolites
so that the concentrations did not attain those they had in the
controls.
In other experiments conducted under the same conditions
of culture the results also suggest that proanthocyanidins play
a role in the plant defence reaction of the larch. Under
nitrogen stress (two and four times the normal concentration
in the growth medium), the concentration of proantho-
cyanidins decreased concomittant with an increased sus-
ceptibility to fungal infection (Ro$ mmert et al., unpublished).
Although these metabolites are primarily contained in the
vacuoles, they are also found in the apoplast (Stafford, 1997)
and may there contribute to limiting potential pathogenicity
of the endophyte.
Previously, not only the concentrations of the phenyl-
propanoids, but also other parameters of the plant defence
response were found to be stronger towards endophytic than
towards pathogenic infection. The activity of PAL was greater
in the axenically grown host Lamium purpureum grown in dual
culture with the endophyte Coniothyrium palmarum than with a
pathogenic Alternaria sp. Elicitation of cell suspension cultures
of L. purpureum with C. palmarum resulted in greater PAL-
activity, a greater release of H#O
#and a higher concentration
of total phenols than when elicited with the Alternaria (Peters
et al., 1998b). Induction of PAL was also higher following
elicitation of suspension cultures of the larch with an
endophyte than with a pathogen (A. Fengler & B. Schulz,
unpublished).
Hypothesis. How does an endophyte manage to exist and
grow within its host without causing visible disease
symptoms? Fig. 8 illustrates a working hypothesis comparing
the endophyte-plant host interaction with that of pathogen
and plant host. Whereas the pathogen overcomes the defence
reaction to the extent that disease develops, the endophyte
only overcomes defence to the extent that it is able to infect
and colonize the plant host. The endophytic infection may
then remain localized as is the case for Rhabdocline parkeri in
Douglas fir (Stone, 1987) or it may become an extensive intra-
and intercellular colonization as we have observed following
inoculation of barley and larch with the endophytes Fusarium
sp. or Cryptosporiopsis sp. Even though disease symptoms do
Endophyte-host interaction : a balanced antagonism? 1282
Balancedantagonism
Suppression ofplant
defence reaction
Plant
Fungicidally active metabolitesEndophyte PathogenD
efence
Def
ence
Tolerance Disease
Her
bici
dally
act
ive
met
abol
ites
Herbicidally active
metabolites
Fig. 8. Hypothesis : balanced antagonism between fungal endophyte and plant host.
not develop, not only pathogen and host, but also endophyte
and host, seem to be actively antagonistic against each other,
as suggested by :
– the high proportion of herbicidal metabolites synthesized
by endophytic isolates ;
– the production of toxic metabolites to the respective
partners by both endophyte and callus in dual culture ;
– the higher concentrations of some phenolic metabolites
during endophytic as compared to pathogenic infection ;
– the greater plant defence reaction to endophytic in contrast
to pathogenic elicitation of suspension cell cultures.
Additionally, the antifungal secondary metabolites that both
endophyte and pathogen can synthesize may, if produced in
vivo, be directed against each other to decrease competition.
The plant defence reactions are active against both fungal
invaders, and both endophyte and pathogen may produce
metabolites toxic to their hosts, but, the pathogen, and not the
endophyte, suppresses the plant defence reaction. Although
this defence may limit the development of disease, the
endophyte apparently can tolerate the plant defence reaction.
The pathogen-host interaction is imbalanced resulting in
disease (Fig. 8), whereas in the endophyte-host interaction the
partners maintain a balanced antagonism without the
development of disease. Should this balance be disturbed in
favour of the fungus, then the endophyte could become a
pathogen. This tolerated endophytic infection does not
exclude the possibility that the endophyte may play a
mutualistic role within its host, for example by increasing the
concentration of defence metabolites potentially active against
pathogens, by excreting phytohormones and}or by increasing
the general metabolic activity of the plant host.
We would like to thank BASF, the Bundesministerium fu$ rBildung und Forschung, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for financial aid. We
are grateful for the excellent and reliable technical assistance
of Qunxiu Hu and to Dr Siegfried Draeger for help identifying
the fungi. We thank Dr W. Maier for patient assistance with
the HPLC analyses and Dr Christine Boyle for astute criticism
of the manuscript and fruitful discussions of the results that led
to development of the hypothesis.
REFERENCES
Agrios, G. N. (1997). Plant Pathology. Academic Press : San Diego, London,
Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo and Toronto.
Bills, G. (1996). Isolation and analysis of endophytic fungal communities from
woody plants. In Endophytic fungi in grasses and woody plants (ed.
S. C. Redlin & L. M. Carris), pp. 31–65. APS Press : St Paul, Minnesota.
Butin, H. (1989). Krankheiten der Wald- und ParkbaX ume. George Thieme
Verlag : Stuttgart & New York.
Cabral, D., Stone, J. K. & Carroll, G. (1993). The internal mycobiota of Juncus
spp. : microscopic and cultural observations of infection patterns. Mycol-
ogical Research 97, 367–376.
Calhoun, L. A., Findley, J. D., Miller, J. D. & Whitney, N. J. (1992). Metabolites
toxic to spruce bud-worm from balsam fir needle endophytes. Mycological
Research 96, 281–286.
Carroll, G. (1988). Fungal endophytes in stems and leaves : from latent
pathogen to mutualistic symbiont. Ecology 69, 2–9.
Demain, A. L. (1980). Do antibiotics function in nature ? Search 11, 148–151.
Gloer, J. B. (1997). Applications of fungal ecology in the search for new
bioactive natural products. In The Mycota (ed. D. T. Wicklow &
B. So$ derstro$ m), pp. 249–268. Springer Verlag : Berlin, Heidelberg and New
York.
Harborne, J. B. (1993). Introduction to Ecological Biochemistry. Academic Press,
Harcourt & Brace & Co., Publishers : London, San Diego, Sydney, New
York, Boston, Tokyo, Toronto.
Hendry, S. J., Boddy, L. & Lonsdale, D. (1993). Interactions between callus
cultures of European beech, indigenous ascomycetes and derived fungal
extracts. New Phytologist 123, 421–428.
Jersch, S., Scherer, C., Huth, G. & Schlo$ sser, E. (1988). Proanthocyanidins as
a basis for quiescense of Botrytis cinerea in immature strawberry fruits.
Zeitschrift fuX r Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 96, 365–378.
Barbara Schulz and others 1283
Kehr, R. D. (1992). Pezicula canker of Quercus rubra L., caused by Pezicula
cinnamomea (DC.) Sacc. II. Morphology and biology of the causal agent.
European Journal of Forest Pathology 22, 29–40.
Konig, G. M., Wright, A. D., Draeger, S., Aust, H.-J. & Schulz, B. (1999).
Geniculol, a new biologically active diterpene from the endophytic fungus
Geniculosporium sp. Journal of Natural Products 62, (in press).
Kottke, I, Guttenberger, M., Hampp, R. & Oberwinkler, F. (1987). An in vitro
method for establishing mycorrhizae on coniferous tree seedlings. Trees 1,
191–194.
Kowalski, T. (1982). Vorkommen von Pilzen in durch Luftverunreinigung
gescha$ digten Wa$ ldern im Oberschlesischen und Krakauer Industriegebiet.
VIII. Mykoflora von Larix decidua an einem Standort mit mittlerer
Immissionsbelastung. European Journal of Forest Pathology 12, 273–280.
Kowalski, T. & Kehr, R. D. (1992). Endophytic colonization of branch bases
in several forest tree species. Sydowia 44, 137–168.
Krohn, K., Bahramsari, R., Flo$ rke, U., Ludewig, K., Kliche-Spory, C., Michel,
A., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S., Schulz, B. & Antus, S. (1997b). Dihydro-
isocoumarins from fungi : isolation, structure elucidation, circular dichroism
and biological activity. Phytochemistry 45, 313–320.
Krohn, K., Beckmann, K., Aust. H.-J., Draeger, S. Schulz, B., Busemann, S. &
Bringmann, G. (1997 c). Generation of the palmarumycin spiroacetal
framework by oxidative cyclization of an open chain metabolite from
Coniothyrium palmarum. Liebigs Annalen-Recueil 1997, 2531–2534.
Krohn, K., Beckmann, K., Flo$ rke, U., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S., Schulz, B.,
Bringmann, G. & Busemann, S. (1997a). Biologically active metabolites
from fungi, 9. New palmarumycins CP%a
und CP&
from Coniothyrium
palmarum : Structure elucidation, crystal structure analysis and determination
of the absolute configuration by CD-calculations. Tetrahedron 53,
3101–3110.
Krohn, K., Franke, C., Jones, P., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S. & Schulz, B. (1992a).
Isolierung, Synthese und biologische Wirkung von Coniothyriomycin
sowie Synthese und Biotestung analoger offenkettiger Imide. Liebigs
Annalen der Chemie 1992, 789–798.
Krohn, K., Ludewig, K., Jones, P., Du$ ring, D., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S. & Schulz,
B. (1992b). Biologically active metabolites from fungi. 2. An antifungal and
herbicidal lanostane lactone from Sporormiella australis. Natural Product
Letters 1, 29–32.
Krohn, K., Ludewig, K., Draeger, S., Aust, H.-J. & Schulz, B. (1994a). Novel
furafuranones from fungi. Journal of Antibiotics 46, 113–118.
Krohn, K., Michel, A., Flo$ rke, U., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S. & Schulz, B. (1994b).
Palmarumycins CP"–CP
%from Coniothyrium palmarum : Isolation, structure
elucidation and biological activity. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1994,
1093–1097.
Krohn, K., Michel, A., Flo$ rke, U., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S. & Schulz, B. (1994 c).
Palmarumycins C"–C
"'from Coniothyrium sp. : Isolation, structure eluci-
dation and biological activity. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1994, 1099–1108.
Krohn, K., Michel, A., Ro$ mer, E., Flo$ rke, U., Aust, H. J., Draeger, S. & Schulz,
B. (1996). Biologically active secondary metabolites from fungi 6 :
Phomosines A–C. Two new biaryl ethers and one new arylbenzyl ether
from Phomopsis sp. Natural Products Letters 8, 43–48.
Leuchtmann, A. (1992). Systematics, distribution, and host specificity of grass
endophytes. Natural Toxins 1, 150–162.
Maier, W., Hammer, K., Dammann, U., Schulz, B. & Strack, D. (1997).
Accumulation of sesquiterpenoid cyclohexenone derivatives induced by an
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in members of the Poaceae. Planta 202,
36–42.
Maier, W., Peipp, H., Schmidt, J., Wray, V. & Strack, D. (1995). Levels of a
terpenoid glycoside (blumenin) and cell wall-bound phenolics in some
cereal mycorrhizas. Plant Physiology 109, 465–470.
Mu$ nzenberger, B., Kottke, I. & Oberwinkler, F. (1995). Reduction of phenolics
in mycorrhizas of Larix decidua Mill. Tree Physiology 15, 191–196.
Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio
assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473–497.
Pankhurst, C. E., Craig, A. G. & Jones, W. T. (1979). Effectiveness of root
nodules rhizobia. Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 1085–1093.
Peipp, H., Maier, W., Schmidt, J., Wray, V. & Strack, D. (1997). Arbuscular
(Accepted 22 December 1998)
mycorrhizal fungus-induced changes in the accumulation of secondary
compounds in barley roots. Phytochemistry 44, 581–587.
Peters, S., Aust, H.-J., Draeger, S. & Schulz, B. (1998a). Interactions in dual
cultures of endophytic fungi with host and nonhost plant calli. Mycologia
90, 360–367.
Peters, S., Dammeyer, B. & Schulz, B. (1998b). Endophyte-host interactions.
I. Plant defense reactions to endophytic and pathogenic fungi. Symbiosis
25, 193–211.
Petrini, O. (1991). Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In Microbial Ecology of
Leaves (ed. J. Andrews & S. Hirano), pp. 179–197. Springer Verlag : New
York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona,
Budapest.
Ro$ mmert, A.-K., Strack, D., Aust, H.-J., Schulz, B. unpublished.
Schlo$ sser, E. (1997). Preformed structural and chemical barriers. In Resistance
of crop plants against fungi (ed. H. Hartleb, R. Heitefuss & H.-H. Hoppe), pp.
84–99. Gustav Fischer : Jena Stuttgart, Lu$ beck, Ulm.
Schulz, B., Guske, S., Dammann, U. & Boyle, C. (1998). Endophyte-host
interactions. II. Defining symbiosis of the endophyte-host interaction.
Symbiosis 25, 213–227.
Schulz, B., Sucker, J., Aust., H.-J., Krohn, K., Ludewig, K., Jones, P. G. &
Do$ ring, D. (1995). Biologically active secondary metabolites of endophytic
Pezicula species. Mycological Research 99, 1007–1015.
Schulz, B., Wanke, U., Draeger, S. & Aust. H.-J. (1993). Endophytes from
herbaceous plants and shrubs : effectiveness of surface sterilisation methods.
Mycological Research 97, 1447–1450.
Sieber, T. N., Sieber-Canavesi, F. & Dorworth, C. E. (1990). Simultaneous
stimulation of endophytic Cryptodiaporthe hystrix and inhibition of Acer
macrophyllum callus in dual culture. Mycologia 82, 659–675.
Sieber, T. N., Sieber-Canavesi, F., Petrini, O., Ekramoddoullah, A. K. M. &
Dorworth, C. E. (1991). Partial characterization of Canadian and European
Melanconium (Melanconis) from some Alnus, Fagus and Quercus species by
morphological and biochemical studies. Canadian Journal of Botany 69,
2170–2176.
Stafford, H. A. (1997). Roles of flavonoids in symbiotic and defense functions
of legume roots. The Botanical Review 63, 27–39.
Stoessl, A. (1966a). The antifungal factors in barley – the constitutions of
hordatines A and B. Tetrahydron Letters 21, 2287–2292.
Stoessl, A. (1966b). The antifungal factors in barley – isolation and synthesis
of hordatine A. Tetrahydron Letters 25, 2849–2851.
Stone, J. K. (1987). Initiation and development of latent infections by
Rhabdocline parkeri on Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Botany 65,
2614–2621.
Stone, J. K. (1988). Fine structure of latent infections by Rhabdocline parkeri on
Douglas-fir, with observations on uninfected epidermal cells. Canadian
Journal of Botany 66, 45–54.
Stone, J. K., Viret, O., Petrini, O. & Chapela, I. (1994). Histological studies of
host penetration and colonization by endophytic fungi. In Host wall
alterations by parasitic fungi (ed. O. Petrini & G. B. Ouellette), pp. 115–126.
APS Press : St Paul. MN.
Suske, J. & Acker, G. (1989). Identification of endophytic hyphae of
Lophodermium piceae in tissues of green, symptomless Norway spruce
needles by immunoelectron microscopy. Canadian Journal of Botany 67,
1768–1774.
Viret, O., Scheidegger, C. & Petrini, O. (1993). Infection of beech leaves (Fagus
sylvatica) by the endophyte Discula umbrinella (teleomorph : Apiognomonia
errabunda) : low temperature scanning electron microscopy studies. Canadian
Journal of Botany 71, 1520–1527.
Weiss, M., Mikolajewski, S., Peipp, H., Schmitt, U., Schmidt, J., Wray, V. &
Strack, D. (1997). Tissue-specific and development-dependent accumulation
of phenylpropanoids in larch mycorrhizas. Plant Physiology 114, 15–27.
Wulf, A. (1990). U$ ber die Bedeutung von Diplodina acerina (Pass.) und
anderen Blattpilzen als Antagonisten der Fenstergallmu$ cke Dasineura
vitrina Kffr. an Bergahorn (Acer pseudoplatanus L.). Nachrichtenblatt des
Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 42, 97–102.
Za$ hner, H. (1977). Some aspects of antibiotics research. Angewandte Chemie
16, 687–694.