the ethics of public relations: black and white or 50 shades of grey? yes, satisfyingly dark – but...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Ethics of Public Relations:
Black and white or 50 shades of grey?
Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?
![Page 2: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Can you have PR without ethics?
• Yes. But:• PR has the power to shape opinion on a large
scale. This brings responsibilities. • People are already dubious about the truth.
Upholding values (honesty, openness, integrity, doing no harm etc) counters that.
• If PR is done without considering what is right, eventually the public, the client or the PR themselves suffer.
![Page 3: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What ethics in PR is NOT
• Getting away with it when you know it is wrong.
• Doing what has always been done because that’s the way things are done.
• Doing whatever the ‘client’ tells you is right (hierarchy or private client).
• Abiding by the letter of the law and nothing else.
![Page 4: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
How do you tell something is ethical?
•Common model: the ‘Five pillars’:
1 Tell the truth.2 Non-malfeasance (do no harm).3 Benificence (do good).4 Confidentiality. Respect privacy. 5 Fairness.
![Page 5: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
In practice
•Conflicts in decisions are inevitable. Question of weighing up values, loyalties, principles.
•How? Common method is the ‘Potter Box’:- Define the situation. Get the facts. - Identify what values apply (honesty, fairness
etc)- Choose which principles are used (the law? Company policy? Code of conduct?)- Choose your loyalties (prioritise
stakeholders). •Make your decision and make it known.
![Page 6: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
A personal example: an ethical place?
•Senior PR at Birmingham Children’s Hospital.
•Daily press contact.•Nearly every decision had an ethical
component.
![Page 7: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Good Stuff
![Page 8: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ethics
• Facts easy to obtain, situation easy to define.
• Values: truth-telling, benificence (‘miracle’ or £), non-malfeasance.
• Principles: Trust policy on consent, the law.• Loyalties are unified: the patient, the Trust,
the media, the public. Everyone wants to see a sick child get better and smiling. But...
![Page 9: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Bad Stuff
![Page 10: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ethics
• Facts easy to obtain, situation easy to define.
• Values: truth-telling, benificence, non-malfeasance.
• Principles: Trust policy on consent, the law.• Loyalties can be divided: the patient, the
Trust, the media. First two outweigh third.
![Page 11: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Really Bad Stuff
![Page 12: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Ethics
• Facts may be hard to obtain in available time, situation may be unknown.
• Values usually apparent: truth-telling, benificence, non-malfeasance. But without the full facts, how do you tell the consequences?
• Principles usually easy: Trust policies, the law.• Loyalties often divided: the Trust, the media. First
usually outweighs the second. But always? Mid Staffs? Barrow? Where managers are failing?
![Page 13: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A Really Bad Example
![Page 14: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What happened?
• Facts were not obtained in available time. Management clammed up.
• Values apparent: truth-telling, benificence, non-malfeasance. But without the facts, impossible to gauge.
• Principles: Trust policies, the law.• Loyalties completely divided: the Trust, the
media. Placed in an impossible position.
![Page 15: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
FAILURE
• Story went ahead without a good counter-argument (facts unknown).
• Loyalties were questioned internally.• Breakdown in client-PR relationship: external
‘experts’ brought in, in-house team marginalised. Trust senior managers shot themselves in the foot by not allowing an ethical decision.
• Change of CEO, hardening of attitudes, worsening of PR for the Trust as a whole.
![Page 16: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Is PR Good for Journalism?
![Page 17: The Ethics of Public Relations: Black and white or 50 shades of grey? Yes, satisfyingly Dark – but is it right?](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051614/551ba07a55034675548b45f8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Yes
• Many shades of grey.• Ethical decision making is important: some
common values with journalism, some important differences but both place value in telling the truth and not doing harm.
• Can be done in a practical, reliable way.• Professionalism and a defined ethical code
are important to support that.• As is a peer network: NUJ